Trump Campaign Releases List: “50 Times Democrats Lied About Biden’s Cognitive Decline” …Now They Should Post a List for the Media!

Trump Campaign Releases List: “50 Times Democrats Lied About Biden’s Cognitive Decline” …Now They Should Post a List for the Media!

by | Jul 6, 2024 | Aggregate

Trump Campaign Releases List: “50 Times Democrats Lied About Biden’s Cognitive Decline” …Now They Should Post a List for the Media!
July 6, 2024

Joe Biden broke the internet when he stumbled through the presidential debate against President Donald Trump.

The Donald J. Trump Campaign released a list on Friday of “50 Times Democrats Lied About Biden’s Cognitive Decline.”

They all lied to the American public.  They knew they were lying.

And they put this country in danger in their quest for power.

For 3½ years, Democrats have lied to the American people about Crooked Joe Biden’s obvious cognitive decline. Now, in a desperate and futile attempt to protect themselves from the wrath of voters this November, they are changing tune and coming to grips with reality. It’s too little, too late.

The destruction and chaos created by the Biden administration isn’t just on Crooked Joe — it’s on the entire Democrat Party.

In 126 days, the American people will remember these lies from Democrats that have enabled historic inflation, allowed the invasion of our country by millions of unvetted illegals, resulted in skyrocketing crime, and compromised America’s national security.

 

 

  • REP. DEBBIE DINGELL: Biden is “energizing”… “and there’s nobody better than Joe Biden.”

 

  • REP. ILHAN OMAR: It’s “very clear” he has “the energy and the ability.”

 

  • REP. JIM CLYBURN: “No one is better equipped” than Joe Biden. “He has the experience. He has the wisdom. He has the demeanor.”

 

  • REP. MARY PELTOLA: “Biden’s mental acuity is very, very on. He’s one of the smartest, sharpest people I’ve met in D.C.”

 

 

  • REP. SUSAN WILD: “He’s very sharp, no memory issues, and his only stumbling is when he trips over words.”

 

  • REP. ANNIE KUSTER: “It’s like, ‘No, he’s fine.’ Most people don’t get an hour with him. He’s sharp. He’s doing fine.”

 

 

 

  • REP. PAT RYAN: The Hur Report is “total bullshit. A political hack job.”

 

 

 

 

 

  • REP. SUSAN WILD: “I am hoping to see President Biden look strong and competent, which I believe he is.”

 

 

 

  • REP. JAMIE RASKIN: Joe Biden was “completely lucid and recalling stories from many years ago.”

 

 

  • REP. DONALD NORCROSS: “Can you ask for any more experience? I think he’s the right guy at the right time.”

 

 

  • SEN. CHRIS MURPHY: “There are literally thousands of people alive in this nation today because Joe Biden is incredibly competent, and he’s incredibly effective.”

 

 

 

  • SEN. BOB CASEY: There is “no question” Biden is prepared to do the job “today” and “would be if reelected.”

 

 

  • SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR: “I was with the president for over an hour … he was focused, his recall was good!”

 

 

  • SEN. ALEX PADILLA: “Not only is he fit to do the job, he’s done a hell of a damn job.”

 

 

 

  • GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM: “I’ve seen him up close, I’ve seen him from afar, but here’s my point: It’s because of his age that he’s been so successful.”

 

  • GOV. TIM WALZ: It’s “ageism” for Americans to be concerned about Biden’s age and stamina.

 

 

 

  • DR. JILL: “Joe is 81, that’s true, but he’s 81 doing more in an hour than most people do in a day.”

 

  • VP KAMALA: I’m not lying. I’m telling you a fact. Of course, I would tell the American public if there was a problem.

 

  • VP KAMALA: “I spend a lot of time with Joe Biden … This is someone who is tireless in terms of working…”

 

  • VP KAMALA: “The way that the president’s demeanor in that report was characterized could not be more wrong on the facts.”

 

  • RON KLAIN: ‘I think his fitness, his vigor, is beyond question.’

 

  • DR. FAUCI: He asks probing questions. He’s right on point on things.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • UNNAMED BIDEN ADVISOR: Biden “works out several days a week” and “he’s in better physical shape than he was 15, 20 years ago.”

 

Dylan Johnson

Deputy Director of Communications

Donald J. Trump for President 2024, Inc.

Follow @TrumpWarRoom | @RealDylanMO

The post Trump Campaign Releases List: “50 Times Democrats Lied About Biden’s Cognitive Decline” …Now They Should Post a List for the Media! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hoft

Orbán and Putin Seek “Quickest Path to Peace” – Orbán in Newsweek: “The Point of NATO Is Peace, Not Endless War”

Orbán and Putin Seek “Quickest Path to Peace” – Orbán in Newsweek: “The Point of NATO Is Peace, Not Endless War”

by | Jul 6, 2024 | Aggregate

Orbán and Putin Seek “Quickest Path to Peace” – Orbán in Newsweek: “The Point of NATO Is Peace, Not Endless War”
July 6, 2024

 

Viktor Obán and Vladimir Putin hold a press conference in Moscow, July 5, 2024

 

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has wrapped up his “peace mission” in Moscow with a press conference with Russian President Vladmir Putin, who called the overture  “an attempt to restore dialogue.” Writing in Newsweek, Orbán said that “The Point of NATO Is Peace, Not Endless War”.

“I have concluded my talks in Moscow with President Putin”, Orbán wrote on X. “My goal was to open the channels of direct communication and start a dialogue on the shortest road to peace. Mission accomplished! To be continued on Monday…”

During the joint press conference, Orbán “pointed out that past European progress was built on peace, and the current war has severely affected the continent’s sense of security and economic stability”, spokesman Zoltan Kovacs said. “Orbán also discussed several key issues with President Putin, including the evaluation of existing peace plans, the possibility of a ceasefire and subsequent peace talks, and the future European security structure post-war. He highlighted the necessity of dialogue and diplomatic channels, underscoring Hungary’s rare position of being able to communicate with both warring parties.”

Vladimir Putin called his talks with Orbán a “substantive, direct and honest discussion”, noting “It is important that we maintain a dialogue even in the current difficult geopolitical situation.”

Orbán had told him about his recent meetings in Kiev, Putin said, where he advanced a ceasefire proposal “to create conditions for peace negotiations with Moscow.”

Putin said Russia “remains open for a discussion on a political and diplomatic settlement. However, the opposite side only makes clear its reluctance to resolve this issue in this manner. Ukraine’s sponsors continue using this country and its people as a ram, making it a victim in the confrontation with Russia.”

“Kiev is still not ready to abandon the idea of waging ‘war until final victory’,” Putin said, criticizing that “the Kiev regime does not allow the very idea of cessation of hostilities because in this case the pretext for extending martial law disappears. And if the martial law has to be cancelled, it means that the elections, which were not held on time, will have to be held. But the chances of winning them are close to zero for the Ukrainian rulers who have lost their ranking and legitimacy.”

Putin noted Russia had advanced a “concrete and genuine peace proposal” June 14, which lays out conditions for “full and final end to the conflict.” The Russian proposal was ignored by the West, and Russia was not invited to the June 15-16 “Summit on Peace in Ukraine” in Lucerne, Switzerland, rendering it completely useless.

Given that Hungary currently holds the Presidency of the Council of the European Union, Putin said he and Orbán “exchanged views on the state of affairs in relations between Russia and the European Union, which are currently at their lowest point. We also talked about the tentative principles of a future security architecture in Europe, also tentative.”

Putin praised Orbán’s peace efforts as “an attempt to restore dialogue.”

The trip to Moscow drew strong rebukes from EU leaders and officials, despite Orbán insisting he was not representing the union. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen accused Hungary’s prime minister of “appeasement” with regards to Putin. “Only unity and determination will pave the path to a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace in Ukraine,” she claimed.

Over the last week, Ukrainian armed forces lost up to 13,525 soldiers in battle, the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) claimed on Friday.

 

Writing in Newsweek, Orbán said that “The Point of NATO Is Peace, Not Endless War”

“It is worth remembering that the most successful military alliance in world history started as a peace project, and its future success depends on its ability to maintain peace,” Orbán wrote. “But today, instead of peace, the agenda is the pursuit of war; instead of defense it is offense. All this runs counter to NATO’s founding values. Hungary’s historical experience is that such transformations never lead in a good direction. The task today should be to preserve the alliance as a peace project.”

“Today ever more voices within NATO are making the case for the necessity—or even inevitability—of military confrontation with the world’s other geopolitical power centers,” Orbán wrote. “This perception of inevitable confrontation functions like a self-fulfilling prophecy. The more that NATO’s leaders believe conflict to be inevitable, the greater will be their role in precipitating it.”

The “self-fulfilling nature of this confrontation prophecy” is illustrated by the news that “preparations have begun for a possible NATO operation in Ukraine—and even high-level reports that troops from NATO member countries are already near the Ukrainian front”, Orbán wrote. Hungary would not participate in such efforts, he said, and has reached an agreement with NATO exempting it from its direct support efforts in Ukraine, whether military or financial.

“As a peace-loving nation, we understand NATO as a defensive alliance—which this agreement helps to ensure. Those who argue in favor of confrontation typically base their arguments on the military superiority of NATO and the Western world,” Orbán criticized.

“The great historian Arnold Toynbee argued that “Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.” As the strongest military alliance the world has ever known, it is not defeat at the hands of any external enemy that we should fear. An external enemy, if it has any sense, will not dare to launch an attack on any NATO member country. But we should very much fear our own rejection of the values that gave birth to our alliance. The purpose for which NATO was created was to secure peace in the interest of stable economic, political, and cultural development. NATO fulfills its purpose when it wins peace, not war. If it chooses conflict instead of cooperation, and war instead of peace, it will be committing suicide,” he stated.

In his first public appearance since a May 30 assassination attempt, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico commended Orbán’s attempts at mediation, Hungarian spokesman Zoltan Kovcas wrote. “Mr Fico expressed admiration for PM Orbán’s trips to Kyiv and Moscow to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin, respectively. He emphasized that there cannot be enough peace initiatives to prevent the Ukraine war from escalating into a broader military conflict.”

Fico has charged Soros-funded media and NGOs for inspiring the assassination attempt on his life  May 30 by a radical left-wing activist.

Geert Wilders’ Dutch Freedom Party and Santiago Abascal’s Spanish Vox Party will be joining Orbán’s “Patriots for Europe” party along with the Austrian Freedom Party and the Czech Action of Dissatisfied Citizens (ANO), Hungarian spokesman Zoltan Kovacs wrote.

Marine LePen’s Nationaly Rally is expected to join after French elections Sunday.

The post Orbán and Putin Seek “Quickest Path to Peace” – Orbán in Newsweek: “The Point of NATO Is Peace, Not Endless War” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Richard Abelson

Internet Goes Wild: Biden’s Speech in Wisconsin Sparks Meme Frenzy — ‘I’m Gonna COME in the Overflow Room’

Internet Goes Wild: Biden’s Speech in Wisconsin Sparks Meme Frenzy — ‘I’m Gonna COME in the Overflow Room’

by | Jul 6, 2024 | Aggregate

Internet Goes Wild: Biden’s Speech in Wisconsin Sparks Meme Frenzy — ‘I’m Gonna COME in the Overflow Room’
July 6, 2024

Joe Biden is excited to share some news with the Wisconsin crowd at the middle school gym.

Joe Biden spoke to a small crowd in Wisconsin at a middle school gymnasium on Friday.

After his campaign speech ended, Joe Biden shook hands with several audience members. Notice how they always look so shocked when they meet Old Joe!

Then Joe went back to the microphone and gleefully told the small audience, “I’m gonna come in the overflow room.”

Social media platforms were soon flooded with memes.

Via Drew Hernandez.

The post Internet Goes Wild: Biden’s Speech in Wisconsin Sparks Meme Frenzy — ‘I’m Gonna COME in the Overflow Room’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hoft

INGRASSIA: Will Ol’ Joe Go Gently Into That Good Night?

INGRASSIA: Will Ol’ Joe Go Gently Into That Good Night?

by | Jul 6, 2024 | Aggregate

INGRASSIA: Will Ol’ Joe Go Gently Into That Good Night?
July 6, 2024

Joe Biden loses his train of thought when questioned why he did so bad in the presidential debate.

Whether Joe Biden will drop out of the presidential race has quickly become the most important question of this year’s race, ever since his disastrous performance at last week’s presidential debate finally put both his party and the world on notice about the sheer magnitude of his decline.  Although most Republicans have been aware of Joe’s condition for a while now – really, ever since he decided to run for president from his Delaware basement four years ago, the Democrats – as well as their apparatchiks in the mainstream media, like CNN and The New York Times – have finally shone the spotlight on this escalating dilemma.  And it’s not like they have much choice: Biden’s cognitive impairment is undeniable, there’s no two ways about it.  Like many other eighty-year-olds, he is an octogenarian with dementia. But unlike those others who suffer in the relative peace and solitude of close family and friends, a president with dementia becomes a walking national security and constitutional liability.

He audibly struggles to string together a few basic words to make a coherent sentence.  He visibly tires after speaking for more than five minutes at a time.  His hands shake and his voice quakes.  He can barely walk in a straight line without wobbling – or being supported by his wife who pretends to be a doctor.  But, alas, Our First Lady, the Good Doctor, has not the remedy for this patient.  Joe Biden has a debilitating condition; in more normal times, he would not be permitted to carry out the solemn duties of his office.  No man with such declining mental faculties should ever have possession of the nuclear codes.  But these are not normal times – we are living through a polarized political environment featuring a forgetful president and his power-hungry wife.  Any movie with that plotline would end in disaster. Ours quickly is spiraling towards a similar outcome — but the tragedy is it’s happening in real time.

There are good reasons to think Biden might step down.  For one, this is the first time in living memory where he cannot count on the media to cover up his countless problems.  The post-debate analysis by CNN called the debate a debacle for Biden – the first bit of accurate reporting from that network in years.   Van Jones, a former Obama aide, called on Biden to reexamine his place in the race at this late stage.  The New York Times, a few days later, went one step further and called on Biden to drop out altogether.

In the intervening days, Biden has attempted to reassure party leaders, donors, and media allies that he can perform his duties.  But his vain attempts at cleanup have left much to be desired.  His speeches are rambling, if not downright coherent.  He always looks confused and lost, even when aided by “Dr. Jill” on stage.  The media and his own wife treat him like a young child; but that may be unfair to the child, who in all likelihood has greater control over his bowels than Ol’ Joe.  The gaffes are nonstop.  Just this week, Biden declared how proud he was for being the “first black woman to serve with a black president.”  Clearly, he meant that he was the first person to select an (allegedly) black woman in Kamala Harris as Vice President but confused that with having served alongside the first black President in Barack Obama.  Equally clear is that Biden would be hard pressed to explain what he meant by that statement – indeed, it is even doubtful at this point that he remembers having at all served as Vice President with Obama.

On the subject of Kamala Harris, as the Vice President, obviously by the 25th Amendment she would be next in line in presidential succession. However, it is doubtful that party leaders would be willing to grant her that office.  Indeed, it is because Kamala generally polls even less favorably than Biden, who already registers as the least popular president – at this stage of his administration – since polling began, that Biden has stood firmly in his post (at least for now).  With Biden’s current approvals, which are in the low-30s and declining, President Trump’s pathway to victory looks to be smooth sailing.  Virtually every single reputable pollster has the 45th President walloping Biden, and by significant margins, in the November election.

This says at least two things: one, it speaks to how lousy a candidate Biden is; and two, it speaks to how much lousier a candidate Harris, or any other candidate Democratic Party leaders nominate, would be in a head-to-head matchup against President Trump.  Not an ideal situation no matter how you spin it.

In addition to the bad polling, there are personal and political reasons why Biden would not just willingly surrender the reins of power.  One, as an 81-year-old politician who has served in various elected offices in Washington for over 50 years, he feels — selfishly — entitled to this office.  He ran for the presidency twice before he stole it in 2020 – in 2008 and 1988.  Few, if anyone, else in the Swamp can match Joe’s track record – all his rivals (Feinstein?) are dead already or have one foot (Pelosi?) in the grave.  Other than Hillary Clinton, who is only a few years younger than Joe, all those would-be contenders to succeed him for the presidency – Kamala Harris, Michelle Obama, Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer – were schoolchildren (if not in diapers) when Biden was first elected to the Senate in 1973. That ego ride is enough reason to want to stay in there.

There are more sinister reasons for holding on as well.  It’s not like Joe has much left in the tank – between the options of the White House and the nursing home, even for a dementia ridden president, the former must be much more delectable, however conceited and short-sighted (if not outright catastrophic) it is for the rest of the country.

More diabolically, being president allows him to retain some semblance of control over the Executive Branch and administrative state – which includes control over the Justice Department.  With Hunter’s looming sentencing for unlawful possession of a firearm just around the corner, and the high probability that Republicans on Capitol Hill will probably not give up investigating and prosecuting Biden for mishandling confidential documents (in addition to a slew of other corruption charges arising from his using the vice presidency to enrich family members including Hunter), the incentives to stay in the office, however incapacitated he might be, appear to far outweigh those in favor of stepping down.  Do Joe, Jill, and the rest of the Biden Crime Family want to relinquish power and risk facing endless prosecution for the rest of their days on earth?  That does not appear like a good option.  Thus, between the Scylla of staying in and the Charybdis of leaving, they may try to hold onto the presidency, for dear life, even as many of their staffers will likely question their long-term career prospects and the brighter of them, seeing the writing on the wall, will jump ship: before it’s too late.

The dimwitted will stay in office and continue to lie and cover up for Biden.  But even the most duplicitous individual in the White House must know, deep down, that they are on a precariously short leash.  As we speak, several Democratic Senators, including Mark Warner, are actively conspiring behind the scenes to oust Joe Biden.  Surely, Kamala Harris is plotting how, if Biden should step down, she will make her move for the presidency.  And of course, there are others – including both Hillary Clinton and the Obama family – who might see the presidency as rightfully theirs, creating a possibility of more infighting and a Palace Revolution of sorts that could plunge the Democratic Party into total disarray at a level not seen since 1968.

There are certainly analogues between this ongoing crisis within the Democratic Party owing to Joe Biden’s age and condition, and the problems that ultimately caused LBJ to not opt for reelection in 1968.  But the situation with Biden is arguably worse.  LBJ announced to the world he would not opt for reelection in March of that year; we are presently in July, a mere four months away from the November election.  The DNC is next month.  To step down now, after the primary has already ended, would send the Democrats into a mad scramble.

They are probably too incompetent, at this stage with all their DEI managers and strategists, to put together an action plan to fill the vacancy and mitigate the competitive free-for-all and inevitable bruised egos that come with it.  If they were to choose Michelle Obama as their party nominee, do people really believe Kamala Harris and her people will just willingly serve another four years for the good of the team, and let the former first lady (man?) serve as first black (fe?)-male president over her?  Is Kamala really the type of person that strikes you as being that selfless? That altruistic? A “for the greater good of the country” kind of girl?

Also, it’s not like Biden is running as an outsider, trying to get into the White House.  He is technically “the president” – that means he’s the incumbent, with all the strictures of a constitutional process (however much they would prefer to ignore or disregard it) to follow.  If Biden gets the boot, Kamala (not “Big Mike” or Hillary or Newsom) is the next man (woman?) up.  There is a 25th Amendment, which theoretically allows Harris to remove Biden on her own terms, with the support of a majority of Cabinet Secretaries, and with some help from Congress.  If Harris were a genius politician, she might be able to invoke the Amendment and seize power that way.

But Harris, as the personification of DEI made flesh (in contrast with Biden, the personification of the geriatric Washington Swamp), she in the greatest likelihood lacks the strategic abilities to pull off such a feat.  One, she’s stupid.  And two, she probably simply doesn’t have what it takes – courage-wise, organizational skills, etc. – to trigger that constitutional article.  To the extent she is even aware such an Amendment exists, she probably lacks the aptitude (despite, of course, being a first-rate legal mind) to divine its legal complexities and meaning.  She is no political genius, or a strategic genius of any sort.  So, it is unlikely that possibility, despite being more feasible than at any time since the 25th Amendment’s ratification, will come to fruition.

All of which is to say, Joe Biden will likely be the Democratic nominee.  Short of him dropping dead, he will go toe-to-toe with Donald Trump in November’s race, a reenactment of 2020.  However, this time, their cover has been blown – if they attempt to steal the race, as they no doubt will, nobody will buy it.  Courts will be far more receptive to evidence of fraud.  But it is unlikely it will even get that far this time around. In 2024, the Democrats have lost nearly all the luster they once had even four short years ago.  They look as worn out as the man at the head of their ticket; karma has a way of catching up to those who have so long enveloped themselves in a mountain of lies.

The jury is out: Donald Trump’s return to the White House in January of 2025 is a forgone conclusion (again, short of a massive cheat).  The Democrats have now become their own worst enemy – to their collective detriment, and to the rest of the world’s great enjoyment.

The post INGRASSIA: Will Ol’ Joe Go Gently Into That Good Night? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Paul Ingrassia

Who is the Judge Protecting? Covenant School Shooter’s Writings Won’t See the Light of Day

Who is the Judge Protecting? Covenant School Shooter’s Writings Won’t See the Light of Day

by | Jul 6, 2024 | Aggregate

Who is the Judge Protecting? Covenant School Shooter’s Writings Won’t See the Light of Day
July 6, 2024

Guest post by Joe Hoft at JoeHoft.com – republished with permission

Chancellor Judge I’Ashea L. Myles Photo Credit Instagram

Who is the Judge Protecting? Covenant School Shooter’s Writings Won’t See the Light of Day.

Tennessee Judge I’Ashea L. Myles has ruled that not one page of the writings by the Covenant school shooter, Audrey Hale, will be released for public review. Why? Sounds like a cover-up. Who is being protected?

The ruling is an insult that helps no one. The cat is already out of the bag. Audrey Hale was a mental patient from the age of six when, in 2001, Hale’s parents turned her over to the mental health “experts” at Vanderbilt University Hospital. And had it not been for the leaked information from a law enforcement source to the Tennessee Star reporters, we’d have no idea the amount of psychiatric drugging that was being conducted on Hale.

But first, we must take a step back and wonder why Hale’s parents found it helpful or necessary to turn over their daughter’s writings to the Covenant School and the parents of the victims. Why? Mom and Dad Hale knew their daughter was a mental health mess for many years. Mom and Dad Hale knew about the psychiatric drug experimenting that was done on their daughter. In fact, Norma Hale is reported to have told investigators that Audrey had to “go through a series of medications to find one that was appropriate for her.” Really?

How many mind-altering drugs was Audrey subjected to before the mental health experts found the one that was “appropriate for her.” Just when was that eureka moment? Given that four mind-altering drugs were found in Hale’s bedroom by investigators, it appears that the eureka moment never happened. The question is how many times was Hale prescribed psychiatric mind-altering drugs, when did the drugging first begin, and how often were Hale’s prescriptions tweaked over two decades to try and “find one that was appropriate for her?”

What Hale wrote in her diary must be a humdinger, or why else would it be so protected? It’s already been leaked that Hale wanted to kill her father. Is there more detailed information about that incident that the parents want withheld? Or did Hale write about her psychiatrists and her frustrations with the number of drugs she was being fed? Because of this judge’s decision, nobody knows and, perhaps, never will.

But this is an interesting case not just because of the withholding of important information about the shooter but also from the standpoint of who should be held responsible for Hale’s murderous behavior. Recall that in February of this year, Jennifer and James Crumbley, the parents of Michigan’s Oxford High School shooter, Ethan, were found guilty of four counts of involuntary manslaughter. It was a first-of-its-kind trial where the parents of the shooter were found criminally responsible for their son’s mass murder and sentenced to prison. Why? In this case, the Crumbleys failed to secure a gun and ammunition at home and failed to get help to support Ethan’s mental health. Not enough mental health?

What happens when there is too much mental health intervention? Did Hale’s parents fail to understand the serious and deadly side effects associated with the psychiatric drug cocktails their daughter was being prescribed? There is little doubt, given the information that has since been leaked about Hale’s mental illnesses, that the parents were fully aware of their daughter’s volatile behavior. Further, because Hale was living with her parents, did the parents have a duty to ensure that their daughter’s guns and ammunition were secure? Did Hale’s parents deliberately give their daughter’s writings to others to hide information that might prove embarrassing to them or others? Who?

Maybe Audrey’s diary provides details about her “treatment” at the hands of the professionals at Vanderbilt. Maybe in Hale’s lucid moments, she was less than thrilled with the “treatment” she was being subjected to at Vanderbilt, and she wrote about it.

Maybe the smartest guys in the room over at Vanderbilt Hospital didn’t pay attention to the possible serious adverse events associated with their chemical concoctions being mixed for Audrey. Maybe the best and brightest “treating” Audrey had a duty to inform law enforcement about her homicidal ideation that she spoke of often during “treatment” sessions? How would those actions, or Vanderbilt’s lack of action, be any different than what was expected of the Crumbleys?

Seems like an awful lot of people knew of Hale’s serious/murderous behavioral distress and did nothing to protect her or the public. Somebody’s got to be responsible. And one must wonder if Audrey’s writings are the key to finding out how best to correct this grievous wrong. It could be argued that by virtue of the fact that Hale took the time to write about what was happening in her life she meant for us to see it. It could be argued that Hale meant for us to understand her drug-induced insanity. But thanks to Judge Myles, the public is dealt another final assault. Who is the Judge protecting?

Be the Voice for the Voiceless

Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded.Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive. As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives.

The post Who is the Judge Protecting? Covenant School Shooter’s Writings Won’t See the Light of Day appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Guest Contributor