Sen. Dave McCormick REFUSES to Back Tuesday Leadership Vote to Reelect RINO John Thune After Catastrophic Midterm Bloodbath — Demands Accountability FIRST!

Sen. Dave McCormick REFUSES to Back Tuesday Leadership Vote to Reelect RINO John Thune After Catastrophic Midterm Bloodbath — Demands Accountability FIRST!

Sen. Dave McCormick REFUSES to Back Tuesday Leadership Vote to Reelect RINO John Thune After Catastrophic Midterm Bloodbath — Demands Accountability FIRST!
November 9, 2026

“John Thune” by Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0

Pennsylvania Republican Senator Dave McCormick, a West Point graduate, Army combat veteran, and successful businessman, has publicly refused to support Tuesday’s scheduled Senate Republican leadership elections that would rubber-stamp John Thune’s continued role as leader of what’s left of the GOP conference.

McCormick made clear that Republicans should not rush into another leadership election without first examining what went wrong, accepting responsibility, and determining how to regain the trust of American voters.

In a statement released Sunday, McCormick wrote:

“One of the things I learned in business and the Army is that after a failure, you have to start with honesty, transparency, and accountability. A week ago, we had the worst election results in decades. We need a discussion about what went wrong, how we fix it, what we stand for, and how our agenda must focus on the concerns of the American people.

As l’ve shared with Leader Thune, I don’t believe we should move to leadership elections until we have digested and debated the lessons of the midterms and how to move forward. We need leadership in place fast, but Tuesday is too soon. I know it’s been the practice to go straight to leadership elections in recent years, but we should not rush it.”

McCormick is not alone.

Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson has already launched an effort to postpone the leadership elections following the GOP’s disastrous showing.

According to Just the News, Johnson secured the five Republican signatures necessary to request a Senate Republican Conference meeting to discuss delaying the vote.

Utah Senator Mike Lee has also supported holding a serious discussion before Republicans select their leaders.

Johnson described the idea of rushing ahead with leadership elections after such substantial losses as political malpractice, according to the Washington Examiner.

The Senate Republican leadership elections are currently scheduled for Tuesday, November 10, at 9 a.m. in the Old Senate Chamber.

Thune is seeking another term as Republican leader, but with Democrats poised to control the Senate in January, he would become Senate Minority Leader rather than continue as Majority Leader.

The post Sen. Dave McCormick REFUSES to Back Tuesday Leadership Vote to Reelect RINO John Thune After Catastrophic Midterm Bloodbath — Demands Accountability FIRST! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft

BREAKING: Another Top DOJ Offical Abruptly Resigns, Blanche Confirms

BREAKING: Another Top DOJ Offical Abruptly Resigns, Blanche Confirms

BREAKING: Another Top DOJ Offical Abruptly Resigns, Blanche Confirms
November 9, 2026

Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks at White House Press Briefing (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate of the Justice Department’s civil division has resigned, marking the fourth high-level DOJ resignation since the midterm elections last Tuesday. 

Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Shumate’s resignation on X this morning.

“Today I accepted the resignation of Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate of the Civil Division. Under his leadership, the Division pursued important affirmative litigation to challenge sanctuary policies and delivered key wins in lawsuits against local policies that endangered federal law enforcement. The Division also secured historic settlements to end illegal corporate DEI practices and shuttered dozens of clinics which were providing so-called ‘gender affirming care’ to minors,” Blanche said.

“We are grateful for Brett’s service at DOJ and wish him continued success.”

This comes after three other resignations, starting with Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon last Thursday.

Blanche also announced that US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida Jason Quiñones and Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division John Eisenberg resigned over the weekend.

MORE:

BREAKING: Two More DOJ Officials Abruptly Resign – Including Top Prosecutor Spearheading Russiagate Case Against John Brennan

Developing…

The post BREAKING: Another Top DOJ Offical Abruptly Resigns, Blanche Confirms appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jordan Conradson

BREAKING: Russell Brand Sentenced to Ten Years and Six Months in Prison

BREAKING: Russell Brand Sentenced to Ten Years and Six Months in Prison

BREAKING: Russell Brand Sentenced to Ten Years and Six Months in Prison
November 9, 2026

Russell Brand shared video evidence that plenty of Democrats have been “election deniers.” (Russell Brand / YouTube screen shot)

British comedian and actor Russell Brand was sentenced on Monday to 10 years and six months in prison after a jury convicted him of raping one woman in 2009 and sexually assaulting three others between 2004 and 2009.

The sentence for the decades-old sex crimes was handed down at Southwark Crown Court in London by Judge Joel Bennathan following a four-week trial.

Brand, 51, was found guilty last week of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault. He was acquitted of two additional rape counts and one charge of attempted indecent assault.

The rape conviction carries a nine-year prison term.

The three sexual assault convictions received sentences of nine months, 18 months, and eight months, to run concurrently with one another but consecutively to the rape sentence, for a total of 10 years and six months.

Brand must serve two-thirds of the sentence before becoming eligible for parole. He will remain on the sex offenders’ register for life.

Judge Bennathan described Brand as a “sexual predator” who told a “series of lies” and displayed “staggering arrogance.”

WATCH:

Brand had been denied bail after the conviction and was already in custody at HMP Wandsworth.

The convictions relate to four of the six women who made allegations against Brand spanning the mid-to-late 2000s.

One incident involved Brand groping a woman’s breasts at a London bar in 2004.

Another involved sexual assault at a radio station in 2004 or 2005.

A third occurred in 2009 during work on a Channel 4 project.

The alleged rape took place at Brand’s west London home in 2009 after he met the woman at one of his shows.

Victim impact statements were read in court, with one woman describing lasting trauma and fear of contracting HIV.

The women never went to police and only came forward after being approached by journalists during 2023 investigations by The Times, The Sunday Times, and Channel 4’s Dispatches.

Brand had pleaded not guilty to all charges and maintained that he never had non-consensual sex.

The post BREAKING: Russell Brand Sentenced to Ten Years and Six Months in Prison appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cassandra MacDonald

Former HHS Adviser Calley Means Accuses Susie Wiles of Putting Corporate Donors Ahead of Trump’s MAHA Agenda — Claims White House Insiders SABOTAGED Health Reforms Behind President’s Back (VIDEO)

Former HHS Adviser Calley Means Accuses Susie Wiles of Putting Corporate Donors Ahead of Trump’s MAHA Agenda — Claims White House Insiders SABOTAGED Health Reforms Behind President’s Back (VIDEO)

Former HHS Adviser Calley Means Accuses Susie Wiles of Putting Corporate Donors Ahead of Trump’s MAHA Agenda — Claims White House Insiders SABOTAGED Health Reforms Behind President’s Back (VIDEO)
November 9, 2026

Former senior Trump administration health adviser Calley Means has unleashed explosive allegations against former White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and other top political operatives, accusing them of prioritizing powerful corporate donors over President Donald Trump’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda.

Means, a close ally of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., claims that influential White House insiders undermined efforts to reform America’s food system, rein in corporate influence, and address chronic health problems, all while telling reformers that political fundraising had to come first.

The accusations come just days after Republicans suffered devastating losses in the November 3 midterm elections, triggering a fierce internal battle over who is responsible for the party’s collapse.

In a bombshell interview with Joe Rogan released Friday, Means alleged that senior White House officials repeatedly sided with the sugar, tobacco, pharmaceutical, and processed-food industries while blocking policies championed by Kennedy and the MAHA movement.

He alleged she repeatedly blocked initiatives on children’s diets, ultra-processed foods, and related reforms by citing the need for industry money.

According to Means, Wiles told him multiple times, “We need money for the midterms, Calley. We need money for the midterms,” and specifically, “I need the money from the sugar people to win the midterms.”

Means told Rogan he resigned because a “concentrated group of people” in the administration was “antagonistic to what people voted for” and appeared to be acting “particularly in many cases to enrich their families.”

He named Wiles, her circle (including figures such as Richard Walters, Walker Barrett, James Blair, and pollster Tony Fabrizio), and pointed to preferential access for companies that hired Wiles’ daughter, Katie Wiles, as a lobbyist at Continental Strategy. He described the culture as one in which special interests understood the playbook: pay the right firms and gain priority.

WATCH:

On CBS’s Face the Nation two days later, Means doubled down. He said he believed Trump had been “subverted by people that are beholden to special interests,” that he intended for his public statements to help remove Wiles, and that the elevation of Miller represented a return toward “campaign promises, America First principles.”

He alleged that issues pushed hard from Wiles’ orbit included pathways for fruit-flavored vapes and more lenient treatment of kratom (“gas station heroin”), while core MAHA priorities on food, pesticides, and ultra-processed foods faced resistance, often framed around midterm fundraising needs.

Former FDA Commissioner Marty Makary later offered partial corroboration on tobacco-industry pressure regarding flavored vapes.

Attorney General Todd Blanche dismissed the allegations as coming from a “disgruntled former administration official,” and the White House has pointed to MAHA progress on dietary guidelines, artificial ingredients, and other items. Means maintains the key decisions occurred without Trump’s full knowledge and that the president was, in some cases, treated “like a baby.”

Ballard Partners has issued a statement firmly denying the allegations.

Means has since publicly demanded that Wiles, Ballard Partners, Continental Strategy, and related parties preserve records, citing possible legal threats over his comments.

Means wrote on X:

“This is a formal request for Susie Wiles and James Blair to stop harassing me with texts and calls.

If there is a factual inaccuracy in what I said, send it to me in writing and I will vigorously correct and apologize for any misstatements. I will note that everything I said is substantiated by other senior officials.

If you want to file a lawsuit and get into discovery of whether it’s provably true that Ballard and Continental had an undue influence on the White House policy process, do it.

I believe we are in an existential moment for the country, and Americans were owed an honest accounting of the past two years so we identify the problems we need to move on from.”

[…]

“In light of suggestions that Susie Wiles and James Blair may pursue legal action over my Joe Rogan interview, I am publicly requesting that she, Ballard Partners, Continental Straregy, and other relevant parties immediately preserve all potentially relevant records and communications, including:

All communications between Susie Wiles, Ballard Partners, and their representatives concerning lobbying access, meetings, policy decisions, and corporate clients.

All communications involving Bayer, Monsanto, Ballard Partners, and White House officials concerning glyphosate, the national security executive order, and the administration’s position in Supreme Court litigation involving Bayer.

All communications concerning sugar-industry political contributions, fundraising commitments, and discussions about how those interests related to federal nutrition policy.

All communications involving Tony Fabrizio, food-industry representatives, and White House officials concerning MAHA initiatives, school nutrition standards, and the proposed federal definition of ultra-processed foods.

All drafts, internal correspondence, meeting notes, and communications involving Walker Barrett, Heidi Overton, and other relevant officials concerning the glyphosate executive order and Bayer litigation, including discussions about Secretary Kennedy’s involvement.

All relevant lobbying agreements, invoices, payment records, meeting calendars, visitor logs, and communications concerning corporate efforts to influence the policy decisions discussed in my interview – including from Continental Strategy.

All nonprivileged communications concerning my allegations, their factual accuracy, and any contemplated legal action arising from my interview.

This preservation request includes emails, text messages, Signal, WhatsApp, encrypted or disappearing messages, attachments, drafts, and relevant electronically stored records.

I welcome a full and transparent examination of the facts.”

The post Former HHS Adviser Calley Means Accuses Susie Wiles of Putting Corporate Donors Ahead of Trump’s MAHA Agenda — Claims White House Insiders SABOTAGED Health Reforms Behind President’s Back (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft

(VIDEO) Dana White Responds to Press Sec Offer, Says He’s Meeting With Trump at White House Today

(VIDEO) Dana White Responds to Press Sec Offer, Says He’s Meeting With Trump at White House Today

(VIDEO) Dana White Responds to Press Sec Offer, Says He’s Meeting With Trump at White House Today
November 9, 2026

UFC CEO Dana White

Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) CEO Dana White gave a vague response to President Trump’s press secretary offer over the weekend, telling reporters that he will meet with Trump at the White House today. 

As The Gateway Pundit reported, President Trump offered White the role, announcing on Truth Social Saturday, “I am pleased to announce that the Great Dana White, a violent Fighter and Warrior, has been offered the job of Press Secretary of the United States.”

Asked about the President’s offer during a Saturday press conference, White chuckled and said, “I’m flying to Washington, DC, right now.”

He declined to speak about his private conversations with the President, noting again, “We have a meeting on Monday,” and suggesting he’ll speak more afterward.

“I have a meeting on Monday, I’m flying to DC right now, and I’m sure we’ll have something to talk about after that.”

WATCH:

CNN reported over the weekend that White had declined the role, according to a source familiar with the matter. Still, the meeting between Trump and White is still expected today.

Trump went on to say he was just “kidding” when he offered White the job.

“And then people said, ‘you know, that’s actually a pretty good idea,’” he added.

“But I think Dana likes the idea. And he is a very capable guy, so he’s actually coming tomorrow.”

Trump Says He Was Kidding About Offering Dana White Job of White House Press Secretary (VIDEO)

The post (VIDEO) Dana White Responds to Press Sec Offer, Says He’s Meeting With Trump at White House Today appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jordan Conradson

AI’s 2026 Influence Pushed Democrats on Voters – Like Far-Left Google Before It

AI’s 2026 Influence Pushed Democrats on Voters – Like Far-Left Google Before It

AI’s 2026 Influence Pushed Democrats on Voters – Like Far-Left Google Before It
November 9, 2026

Although many AI models were released in 2023-04, it could be argued that this recent election is the first one where the American electorate was fully aware of AI…..and surrounded by it.

People have been seeking AI’s help for voting decisions. Heavy candidate bias is injected, incorrect instructions are given, races are invented, and even misleading candidate information has been provided.

Not long ago, Dr. Robert Epstein’s election-monitoring research proved Google’s Search bar results were manipulating users on a massive scale to favor Democratic candidates. Those list-based search results were rigged regarding elections, and he proved it.

Now, AI’s human-like answers and authoritative wording are infinitely more convincing than a list of links. AI chatbots give low-information voters a quick answer to a real question. This requires less thinking and less work than using search rankings.

A Pew survey of 5,273 U.S. adults found that 8% were using AI for election information. Among that group, 40% said they sought “suggestions on how to make voting choices.” As expected, people are using AI to help with political and candidate choices.

As the election got closer, more and more people used AI for election answers. In early October, the SSRS Carter Center survey found 11% of adults used AI to learn about House, Senate, and Governor candidates to decide how to vote. By the end of October, this was 25%.

A Yale study found 1/3 of the participants asked an AI chatbot to help them pick a candidate. Nearly 2,500 adults familiar with chatbots were asked to use AI for election questions. 36% asked for help selecting a candidate.

BIAS – ChatGPT vs Grok
Cornell Tech recently conducted research that let both these AI models search the web for current candidate answers. Next, they turned off search, leaving AI to answer with only what it already knows.

ChatGPT is owned by OpenAI. Grok was developed by xAI (Elon Musk) and is now owned by SpaceX.

They asked, “Who should I vote for in ….?” This covered 479 congressional and gubernatorial races, testing the responses 3 separate times. With the web search available, ChatGPT selected Democrats for 97% of the races (1,082 of 1,111). Grok picked Republicans for 92% (952 of 1,038).

ChatGPT has roughly 12–16 times as many users as Grok when comparing their websites or mobile apps. This means GPT’s bias is influencing a lot more people toward leftist ideology and Democrat candidates.

Without search, ChatGPT selected 71% Democrats. Grok’s Republican preference disappeared without search, picking only 34% Republicans. Without search, GPT declined to make a choice in 211 of the 479 races; Grok declined in 298.

Most interesting is the evidence they assembled before recommending candidates. GPT often searched about healthcare and abortion using Wikipedia, AP, and Axios. Grok searched immigration, taxes, crime, and energy using mainstream reporting, iVoterGuide, and Turning Point Action.

When asked to act like a newspaper editorial board, ChatGPT endorsed Democrats in 17 of 18 races. Grok refused 14 of 18, endorsing just 3 Republicans and 1 Democrat.

The Washington Post tested 3,000 AI-generated voting guides. AI chatbots failed 48% of the time on which congressional district an address was in. When it did provide one, it was wrong 22% of the time. Note: Republicans vote in-person more than Dems.

The Dewey Digital investigation examined 7 AI services across 63 congressional and gubernatorial races. Of the 3,054 answers about voting procedures, 13.9% contained outdated or incorrect facts. 5.9% had information that could cause someone to miss a deadline or go on the wrong day. This reached 29% when incomplete answers were also counted.

In the 22,203 answers covering all election-related questions, 5.1% contained a clear factual error. 10.9% contained an error or a misleading claim. Researchers found withdrawn or defeated candidates still running. Biographies confused with other people. And made-up statistics. Some errors repeated across days, so asking later produced the same result.

Results varied across services. In the voting-procedure sample, Claude (Anthropic) supplied an outdated or incorrect fact in 32% of answers, Copilot (Microsoft) in 24.6% and ChatGPT (OpenAI) in 10.2%.

In October, 44 of ChatGPT’s 57 voting-related errors involved the same outdated Texas voter lookup web address. An obsolete link is a problem, but it is not equivalent to inventing dozens of separate voting rules.

After the user shared their political views, ChatGPT recommended a candidate in 79% of the relevant chats and Claude (Anthropic) in 40%, according to the report. This was an election-focused exercise among regular users, so its percentages should not be applied to all Americans.

The sources that AI uses also raised concerns. Dewey Digital found AI was using sketchy sources like betting sites, AI content farms, spoof sites, anonymous blogs, and other low-reliability sources. A false claim was placed beside accurate information, giving readers no reason to question it.

In the summer of 2020, Dr. Epstein warned Congress during his testimony that Google was manipulating voters “on a massive scale.” We have to expect that something similar is going on with AI, and much worse.

The post AI’s 2026 Influence Pushed Democrats on Voters – Like Far-Left Google Before It appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hoft