We didn’t expect this on our 2024 bingo card!

The Old Gray Lady turned on Kama-Kama-Kama Kama-chamelion.

Has The New York Times turned on Kamala, the nation’s most unpopular vice president?

It’s hard to imagine.  The Times on Friday posted a hit on Kamala Harris titled, “Joy is Not a Strategy.”

Then, on Monday, The NY Times published an op-ed titled, “Trump Can win on character,” something that must have made the leftist elites vomit in their mouths.

It didn’t take long for the happy boost from the fantasy convention to flatline.  On Monday night, former Biden spox Jen Psaki faced a harsh reality when Don Lemon told her that “no one” knows who Kamala Harris is in the swing states he visited last week.

Maybe that’s good news, though? The more people learn about Kamala, the less they like her.

The Daily Mail reported:

Ever since President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 election race last month, their print presses and TV networks have put in a hard shift trying to paper over Harris’s past record as the most unpopular Vice President in American history.

To read and listen to their florid praise is to believe that Harris is already a shoo-in for president – and not an 11th hour replacement as Democratic nominee…

…The reliably liberal New York Times was among the first to suddenly change tack on Friday, taking aim at what many perceive to be Harris’s fatal lack of clear policy with a brutal headline that read: ‘Joy Is Not a Strategy’.

In a sour commentary, NYT Deputy Opinion Editor Patrick Healy said he’d ‘cringed’ when former president Bill Clinton took the convention stage on Tuesday to claim that Harris would be ‘the president of joy’.

How’s that going to help the millions of Americans whose livelihoods are now at stake, Healey asked? And why has Harris failed to conduct a single interview or serious press conference since Biden stepped aside last month?

‘Ultimately, she needs more voters in the swing states to trust her to handle the economy better than her opponent… Harris can’t coast on “joy”,’ he concluded witheringly.

But worse was to come from the Times.

On Monday, the newspaper published a guest essay titled ‘Trump can win on character’, by conservative commentator Rich Lowry.

Pulling no punches, Lowry wrote that Harris is ‘weak and a phony and doesn’t truly care about the country or the middle class.’

But don’t get your hopes up. It’s not like they found Jesus all of the sudden. Far from it.

The post BREAKING: NY Times Turns On Kamala! Publishes NUMEROUS OpEds on ‘Weak,’ ‘Phony’ and ‘Ignorant’ Democrat Nominee appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Yesterday, billionaire Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, who is CEO of the company renamed as Meta, admitted in a letter to Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan that the social media giant was subject to government censorship around stories related to COVID and the 2020 election and that he would, in the future, fight such efforts harder than he did previously.

Zuckerberg also said he would not make another “Zuckerbucks” $419 million donation to amplify voting in key left-leaning districts around the nation, a scheme that helped Democrat districts turnout voters and heavily compensate election workers in what said described as bribing election officials and workers.

This Biden-Harris Censorship Industrial Complex changed policies against the political right at Amazon, YouTube, Google, Facebook, among others. The Republican-led House has been holding hearings all summer documenting the nation’s largest and most extensive violation of the First Amendment in history.

Facebook alone, in less than a year, took down over 20 million pieces of content.

Zuckerberg’s letter made these five key admissions:

1. The Biden-Harris Admin “pressured” Facebook to censor Americans, in what other court filings refer to as coercive demands.
2. Facebook subsequently censored Americans.
3. Facebook censored Americans and suppressed information related to COVID-19.
4. Facebook suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story, because it was told by the intelligence community that it was “Russian disinformation” which is now known to be a complete lie and fabrication.
5. Zuckerberg and the company regrets censoring Americans on behalf of demands by the federal government and would resist it more strongly in the future.
6. Zuckerberg would not be making another major donation to far-left election officials to subsidize their election efforts in this election cycle.

These admissions are also important because the federal courts are still hearing the case in Missouri v. Biden where the states of Louisiana and Missouri are challenging the Biden-Harris’ violations of the first amendment, and on behalf of their affected citizens.

READ THE ZUCKERBERG LETTER:

Loading…

The letter is in response to an ongoing investigation by the House Judiciary Committee into the ongoing, systemic, violation of the First Amendment.

On June 26th, the Supreme Court in a horrible opinion connected to the Missouri v. Biden litigation, written by Justice Amy Coney-Barrett, said that the government could continue suppressing free speech around elections and political topics while the case was working its way through the lower courts. The 6-3 decision, joined by Justice Kavanaugh, was a major free speech setback dealt by federal courts that don’t hesitate to protect pornography and flag burning, but hesitate, vacillate, and refuse to protect Americans who simply want to opine to their friends on social media about vaccine mandates.

It later emerged that one of Justice Coney-Barrett’s clerks working on the case has close personal connections to major hubs of the censorship complex at Yale.

Gateway Pundit Founder and Publisher Jim Hoft is the lead Plaintiff in the Missouri v. Biden case. The case is described by free speech champions as the most important first amendment case in a generation.

The Missouri v. Biden case is so Orwellian that it emerged during discovery that the government considers the thoughts of its citizens as ‘critical infrastructure’ so that the government can then justify doing almost anything to combat ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation.’

These Zuckerberg admissions come as a result of conservatives claiming that this was happening for years, including in 2018 when James O’Keefe and Project Veritas first revealed the way social media companies were ‘shadow banning’ and otherwise ‘throttling’ content. When billionaire Elon Musk purchased Twitter, he also released internal documents to selected journalists called “The Twitter Files” which similarly showed a pattern of ongoing speech suppression and relationships between the U.S. intelligence community and social media companies where key staff positions were being filled by deep state operatives. The 19-part series of releases so far was truncated when Musk last December, whose businesses are all reliant on heavy state spending and subsidies, revoked or restricted access to the designated journalists and considered the matter closed.

The recent arrest of Pavel Durov in France, the founder of the Telegram messaging app, also signals that the deep state, possibly at the instigation of NATO-countries, are shutting down free speech globally and that Biden’s efforts at censoring Americans is part of a larger effort to silence dissent globally.

The mainstream media, the original disinformation superspreader, in typical fashion, gets the story completely wrong and purposefully deceives their readers about the Zuckerberg letter:

PBS lies and says that this Biden Censorship Complex only operated during the pandemic. They purposefully confuse their readers that this censorship regime ever stopped, and also that it was just about COVID. Hunter Biden’s laptop had nothing to do with COVID. Suppressing evidence of voter fraud had nothing to do with COVID.

Reuters tries to minimize the coercive actions of the Biden Administration to suppress and censor news, journalism, and speech by saying in their headline that it was just about “pressure.” It wasn’t just pressure, it was also that the government, through the FBI and various other departments, including the White House, were demanding that these social media posts and content be suppressed. This wasn’t just pressure, it was both the massive system at work that enacted the will of the White House and left-wing billionaires to silence Americans’ speech, but also the power of the state put behind these requests.

Politico makes this censorship complex, and Zuckerberg’s statements, seem like whining when they refer to it as “pressure” and that Zuckerberg “regrets” not being more “outspoken” and that these all amount to “grievances.” Yet what was happening was the systemic suppression of the First Amendment, by the federal government against individual citizens, where the White House and FBI were demanding private companies delete comments, threads, entire accounts, on behalf of the political priorities of left-wing officials.

The post Zuckerberg Admits to Massive Biden-Harris Govt Censorship Regime: Zuck: “We promise to fight it next time” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.