Chancellor Olaf Scholz has managed to become the most unpopular German leader in many decades, and it’s not by coincidence – he works hard at serving the Globalist overlords, and ignoring the basic needs of his population.

Now, in the aftermath of yet another migrant-related serial stabbing killings, Scholz has once again vowed to ‘step up deportations’ – we have seen this movie.

During a visit to Solingen, where the attack linked to Islamic State took place, emboldening the rightwing opposition rhetoric, the Chancellor ‘talked the talk’ – but by now we all know he won’t ‘walk the walk’.

Reuters reported:

“‘We will have to do everything we can to ensure that those who cannot and are not allowed to stay in Germany are repatriated and deported’, Scholz told reporters in the western city, where he laid a flower at the scene of the crime. ‘This was terrorism, terrorism against us all’, he added.

The attack, in which a 26-year-old suspected Islamic State member from Syria is accused of killing three people, has fuelled political tensions over asylum and deportation rules ahead of three state elections next month.”

ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack during the festival that left three killed and eight injured – some seriously.

“The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which campaigns for a crackdown on migration, is leading in the polls in Saxony and Thuringia, where state elections are set for Sunday, and in Brandenburg, which has its election on Sept. 22.”

Oppositionists from AfD seized on the attack in its election campaign – pitching to voters the choice of ‘AfD or Solingen’.

The attack puts pressure on Scholz as his ‘traffic light coalition’ is trailing in the polls.

“In a sign of tougher rhetoric, Scholz promised in October 2023 to ramp up deportations ‘big style’ – a promise he repeated after his visit to the Solingen attack scene.”

Scholz had already promised a tougher stance on deportation after an Afghan man stabbed and killed a police officer.

“Scholz said on Monday deportations had increased by some two-thirds compared to 2021 levels. ‘But that is no reason for us to sit back and relax’, he added, saying the government was looking at legal and practical ways to boost the numbers.”

His Interior Minister, Nancy Faeser, called for changing the law so that only blades of 6 centimeters (2.36 inches) would be allowed to be carried in public.

Deutsche Welle reported:

“‘Knives are used to commit brutal acts of violence that can cause serious injury or death’, Faeser told the ARD public broadcaster in early August. ‘We need tougher weapons laws and stricter controls’.”

Police statistics recorded a 9.7% rise in knife attacks, with as much as 8,951 incidents in 2023.

“‘We have exploding foreign crime, youth crime, migrant violence, because we have open borders’, AfD co-leader Alice Weidel told public broadcaster ZDF in July.”

Left-wing criminologists try to convince German society that there is no link between violent crime and mass migration.

“That speaks to the more immediate problem of how to police possible attacks in the first place. Lars Wendland, chairperson of the German police union GdP, welcomed Faeser’s proposal in principle, but argued that police needed more than just a legal change to work effectively. ‘What use is a tightening of the law if we can’t enforce it?’ he told DW. ‘We also have to look at whether we have the personnel and material to implement it’.”

Read more:

UPDATE: German Officials STORM MIGRANT SHELTER in Connection to ISIS Stabbing Attack in Solingen – Killer from Syria Turns Himself In!

The post Failed German Chancellor Talks Tough AGAIN, Promises Deportations after Migrant’s Stabbing Spree Rattles German Society appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Guest Post by Miriam Judith.

In a troubling case, a former Arizona teacher, Robyn Rogers, 44, is set to not face jail time after pleading guilty to charges involving the sexual abuse of a 17-year-old minor, who Rogers was hiding in her house after he ran away from home back in February.

Rogers was arrested in July after it was discovered that the former educator was hiding the runaway teen in her home, while also engaging in sexual relations with him.

It took several tips to the police from concerned citizens before authorities were able to locate the boy, who had been missing for months, and take him into custody, according to AZ Family.

Prosecutors claimed that Rogers specifically groomed this boy, who she had known since his freshman year in high school, to engage in sexual activities with her, showcasing a deliberate abuse of her position as an educator.

Despite facing three counts of sexual conduct with a minor, in addition to charges related to drug paraphernalia, hindering prosecution, possession of narcotics, and false reporting to law enforcement, Rogers may escape jail time entirely, according to Havasu News, due to a plea deal that would only put her on supervised probation—a mere slap on the wrist for such egregious offenses.

As the judge prepares to review the plea agreement in September, many community members and advocates are rightfully outraged.

There is a growing call to action for the judiciary to take a hard stance against such lenient treatment of offenders like Rogers.

This case is more than just an isolated incident; it reveals a broader issue within our judicial system that often favors leniency over accountability.

While the legal system pretends to protect our children, cases like this highlight a troubling trend where sexual predators are often let off lightly, undermining public trust.

Unfortunately, this trend has led to a major spike in these types of sex crimes between teachers and their child victims in the US.

In 2023 alone, there were over 350 different teachers who were charged, according to Fox News – And once the numbers are clocked at the end of this year, it will be even worse.

Law and Crime reported on Rogers in July.

The post Arizona Teacher Who Hid Runaway Teen For Months In Her Home Pleads Guilty to Sexual Conduct With Minor – OUTRAGEOUS Plea Deal Includes NO JAIL Time appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby held a phone gaggle with reporters on Monday where he spoke about the third anniversary of the deadly Abbey Gate terror bombing at the Kabul airport during Biden’s retreat from Afghanistan that killed 13 servicemembers and over 150 Afghans and wounding dozens more.

One reporter asked Kirby why neither Biden, on vacation in Delaware, nor Kamala Harris, hiding out from reporters in Washington, held any public observance of the anniversary of the attack like Trump did at Arlington Cemetery Monday morning with several Gold Star families and Abbey Gate survivors. Kirby said that Trump was personally invited by the families of the fallen, implying Biden and Harris were not invited.

Biden and Harris issued separate statements Monday on the attack anniversary. Biden’s statement at this link. Harris’ statement at this link.

Unbelievable.

Trump is at Arlington Cemetery honoring the 13 American heroes killed at Abbey Gate during the Afghanistan withdrawal.

Meanwhile, the leaders who conducted it — President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris — are nowhere to be found. pic.twitter.com/9ygdgmNR0i

— Kristina Wong (@kristina_wong) August 26, 2024

Excerpt from the White House transcript of Kirby’s off-camera phone gaggle:

MODERATOR: Next up we’ll go to Francesca Chambers.

Q Thanks, Kirby. Appreciate it. Two questions. First one on what’s going on with Hezbollah in the Middle East. The President sent the Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman there over the weekend on a surprise visit. What does he hope to accomplish with that visit? What does he hope to learn?

And then, secondarily, going back to your opening remarks on Afghanistan, why did the President and Vice President release separate statements today? And why did the White House feel that they did not need to host or attend public events in the way that former President Donald Trump did today? Thank you.

MR. KIRBY: Well, a couple of things here.

I mean, first, on the Chairman’s trip, it’s always useful when the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs has an opportunity to visit with and meet with and learn from his counterparts overseas. And obviously, with everything going on in the Middle East and the added force posture that we have contributed to the region, it makes a lot of sense at this particular time for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs to go over there and have those conversations.

And I’m sure that — I won’t speak for Chairman Brown, of course, but I’m sure he’s learning a lot, and he’s getting an opportunity to see firsthand what our military readiness looks like and getting a chance to thank the men and women that are deployed over there or serving over there. So, lots of good reasons at this particular time for the most senior military officer to go for a visit.

And then, on your second question, I would say there are many ways that we as a nation and our leaders can observe the third anniversary of Abbey Gate. And Mr. Trump was invited by at least one, I think maybe several, of the families to lay a wreath at Arlington, and that is certainly a way to recognize the sacrifice and the loss. But it was a personal invitation by families, and certainly I’ll let him speak to that and his willingness to do it. But that was a way.

Another way is to continue to work, maybe not with a lot of fanfare, maybe not with a lot of public attention, maybe not with TV cameras, but to work with might and main every single day to make sure that the families of those — of the fallen and of those who were injured and wounded, not just at Abbey Gate but over the course of the 20-some-odd years that we were in Afghanistan, have the support that they need.

And you don’t have to look very far at the President and the First Lady’s track record and the Vice President’s track record over the last three and a half years to see how deeply devoted they are to the men and women of our military and to our veterans and to their families, everything from Joining Forces to the PACT Act and any number of other steps that this administration has taken to make sure that we are meeting, as the President describes, our one true, sacred obligation as a country. There’s an awful lot that goes into that.

And the President, the Vice President, the First Lady, Second Gentleman, they take those responsibilities seriously. You may not see them every day. You may not get a headline on it every day. There may not be a press release. But it doesn’t mean that that work isn’t ongoing, and that the respect and the admiration that they have for everyone who is now or ever has served a uniform remains a paramount priority for them.

The observance at Arlington National Cemetery Monday morning was a stirring tribute by President Trump.

Trump participated in three wreath laying ceremonies at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier for three of the fallen with their family members and wounded Abbey Gate survivors.

Video of the ceremony below. Toward the end of the wreath laying ceremonies, Iraq war veteran former Congressman and current Army Reserve Lt. Col. Tulsi Gabbard can be seen with a group of veterans looking quite moved:

Gabbard, still looking quite touched, spoke about her experience at Arlington in a Fox News interview about her endorsement later that day of President Trump. Gabbard said Trump met for hours with the families at Arlington.

Trump also visited the graves of the fallen.

⁦@realDonaldTrump⁩ speaks via phone to the family of SSG Ryan Knauss who couldn’t make it today, as he lays flowers at their boys grave … pic.twitter.com/QNUELSPJKA

— Chris LaCivita (@LaCivitaC) August 26, 2024

pic.twitter.com/sc9rGv7sYh

— Dan Scavino Jr. (@DanScavino) August 26, 2024

President @realDonaldTrump visiting @ArlingtonNatl Cemetery this morning to lay wreaths with Gold Star families at the graves of our brave men & women who lost their lives 3 years ago today during the disastrous Afghanistan withdraw in 2021.

Pictured with the family of Sgt.… pic.twitter.com/VKsbShGWWC

— Corey R. Lewandowski (@CLewandowski_) August 26, 2024

We honor the 13 KIA from Abbey Gate but also the wounded pic.twitter.com/a4rddgx8ie

— Rep. Mike Waltz (@michaelgwaltz) August 26, 2024

Sgt. Nicole L. Gee
Cpl. Daegan Page
LCpl. David Espinoza
LCpl. Dylan Merola
Cpl. Humberto Sanchez
Cpl. Hunter Lopez
Sgt. Johanny Rosario Pichardo
SSG. Ryan Knauss
LCpl. Kareem Nikoui
Seaman Maxton Soviak
SSgt. Darin Hoover
LCpl. Jared Schmitz
LCpl. Rylee McCollum

— Rep. Mike Waltz (@michaelgwaltz) August 26, 2024

Last photo by New York Times photographer Doug Mills:

During a ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery, @realDonaldTrump lays a wreath in honor of those who were killed during the Abbey Gate bombing. With Trump is Marine Cpl. Kelsee Lainhart, was paralyzed during the bombing and 13 U.S. service members died. pic.twitter.com/fthyK7cOFe

— Doug Mills (@dougmillsnyt) August 26, 2024

The post Ouch: Asked Why Biden Wasn’t at Arlington Cemetery Like Trump to Mark the Kabul Airport Bombing, John Kirby Said Trump Was Personally Invited by the Families of the Fallen appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In a recent explosive interview with Tucker Carlson, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dropped a bombshell about his willingness to take on a role that would shake Washington to its core: CIA Director. But the revelations didn’t stop there.

When asked by Carlson whether he would accept the role of CIA Director if offered, RFK Jr. didn’t hesitate but acknowledged the political hurdles he would face in securing Senate confirmation.

He explained that the intelligence agencies are fiercely protected by powerful committees in both the Senate and the House, committees that have long been “safeguarding” the interests of the intelligence community.

Kennedy acknowledged that his appointment would be a direct threat to the entrenched powers within these committees, making his confirmation an unlikely prospect.

Tucker Carlson: The CIA, I mean, a lot of roads lead back, unfortunately, to our most powerful intelligence agency. If you were asked, would you run it? Would you become CIA director if you were asked?

RFK Jr.: Yes, I would, but I would never get Senate confirmation. As you know, the intelligence agencies are protected by very, very powerful committees in the Senate and in the House that are already into the project. The people who serve on those committees are safeguarding that directorship, and I would be very dangerous for those committees.

Tucker Carlson: Yet in your joint appearance on Friday, President Trump introduced you by saying that he plans to, if elected, establish a commission to declassify the remaining documents regarding your uncle’s murder in 1963.

RFK Jr.: Yeah.

Tucker Carlson: I think everyone at this point knows the truth, which is the CIA is implicated in that. Those documents protect the CIA, maybe, among others.

RFK Jr.: Well, whether they do or not, it’s odd that they’ve not allowed them to be released.

Tucker Carlson: What could possibly be the reason?

RFK Jr.: More than 60 years after my uncle’s death, almost 65 years. None of the people who were implicated in that crime are alive now. The last ones have died off in the last year or two. It clearly is to protect the institution. That’s wrong. It’s just wrong. It’s wrong for a Democrat, and it’s wrong for a Republican.

But the most shocking revelation came when RFK Jr. discussed President Trump’s 2020 campaign promise to declassify the remaining documents related to his uncle, President John F. Kennedy’s, assassination.

During the interview, Kennedy revealed that Trump was prepared to follow through on his promise but was talked out of it by none other than former CIA Director Mike Pompeo. According to RFK Jr., Pompeo “begged” Trump not to release the files, warning that it would be a “catastrophe.”

Carlson didn’t mince words, calling Pompeo a “criminal” and challenging the former CIA Director’s motives.

Tucker Carlson: It’s just interesting, though, that a bipartisan list of presidents, over these six decades, have kept those files classified.

RFK Jr.: Well, you and I both know. I was astonished that Trump didn’t declassify them because he promised to during the campaign.

Tucker Carlson: That was Mike Pompeo who did that.

RFK Jr.: Yeah, and I talked to President Trump for the first time about that this week. He said that Mike Pompeo begged him to not declassify the files. I don’t think I’m telling tales out of school here. But he said Mike Pompeo called him and said, ‘It would be a catastrophe to release this. You need to not do it.’

Tucker Carlson: I want to say again, I think Mike Pompeo was a criminal. That’s my view. He threatened to sue me for saying that, but I hope he will because it’s true. But that tells the whole story right there, right? Why would the CIA be trying to keep these files classified if they had nothing to do with the murder? I don’t really get that.

WATCH:

Whoa…

RFK Jr Says Yes, He’d be the CIA Director if Asked, and Talked to Trump for the First Time why he Didn’t declassify all of JFK Assassination Files
— “I would be very very Dangerous to them…”
— “None of the People implicated are Alive Now.”

• Would RFK take the… pic.twitter.com/nioAPcpUve

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) August 27, 2024

The post RFK Jr. Open to CIA Director Role — Reveals Who ‘Begged’ Trump Against Declassifying JFK Assassination Files appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In a country where common sense should reign supreme, one would expect a unified front in favor of protecting the sanctity of our elections. Yet, the Democrats continue to stand against measures designed to ensure that our electoral process is both fair and secure.

The latest instance of this troubling trend comes from Georgia, where the state’s Election Board has taken a bold step toward safeguarding election integrity—only to be met with fierce opposition from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Democratic Party of Georgia.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that the Georgia Election Board voted 3-2 in favor of a new rule that mandates election workers to compare the total number of ballots cast with the total number of unique voter ID numbers in the system.

This crucial regulation aims to ensure that every vote cast is legitimate, allowing for thorough investigations into any discrepancies before election results can be certified.

Under this new rule, if any precinct shows that the number of ballots exceeds the number of unique voter IDs, counties must withhold certification of those election results until a complete investigation into potential fraud is conducted.

The specifics of the newly approved regulation are clear:

• Tabulating Results: By 3 PM on the Friday following an election, the Election Board must review precinct returns, including absentee ballots and provisional ballots. The total number of unique voter IDs will be compared against total ballots cast.

• Investigating Discrepancies: If discrepancies arise—where ballots exceed unique voter IDs—the Board is mandated to investigate thoroughly before any votes from that precinct are counted.

• Certification of Results: Only after all discrepancies have been resolved can results be certified. This ensures that every vote reflects the true will of the people.

Moreover, Board members are empowered to scrutinize all election-related documentation prior to certifying results, ensuring potential fraud is detected and addressed before they become official. If fraud is uncovered, appropriate actions will be taken, including reporting findings to district attorneys.

However, instead of supporting these measures aimed at protecting electoral integrity, the DNC and its affiliates have chosen to sue the State Election Board over these rules.

If the election is truly safe and secure, there’s no reason to worry—unless they’re planning to cheat.

According to the far-left Democracy Docket:

The “reasonable inquiry rule” states that a county board can only certify an election “after reasonable inquiry that the tabulation and canvassing of the election are complete and accurate and that the results are a true and accurate accounting of all votes cast in that election.”

The “examination rule” allows individual county election board members to “examine all election related documentation created during the conduct of elections prior to certification of results.”

The DNC and the other plaintiffs asked the state court to declare that under Georgia law, the certification of election results is a mandatory duty and election superintendents don’t have discretion to delay certification or not to certify at all. Also, the Democrats urged the court to mandate that Nov. 5 election results must be certified by 5 p.m. on Nov. 12.

If the two rules mentioned in the lawsuit are not interpreted within the context of state law that makes certification mandatory, then the court should block the implementation of the rules and rule that they are “an invalid and unlawful exercise of [the board’s] authority,” the plaintiffs argued in the lawsuit.

The three Republican board members—Janice Johnston, Rick Jeffares, and Janelle King—who championed these rules have been lauded by former President Donald Trump as “pit bulls fighting for honesty, transparency, and victory.”

They recognize that election certification should not merely be a rubber-stamping exercise but rather a critical duty requiring thorough investigation to ensure accuracy.

However, Governor Kemp is now working with the Democrats, asking the Georgia Attorney General whether he has the authority to remove the three Georgia State Election Board members who are implementing election integrity reforms.

Read more:

Dirty Brian Kemp Asks Georgia AG If He Has the Authority to Remove Courageous GA State Election Board Members Who Are Implementing Election Integrity Reforms

Read the lawsuit here.

The post You Can’t Make This Up: DNC Sues Georgia Election Board for Ensuring Every Vote Reflects the True Will of the People appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.