John Mills: A Way Forward on Taiwan?

John Mills: A Way Forward on Taiwan?

John Mills: A Way Forward on Taiwan?
September 29, 2024

Commentary

Recent discussions between journalists and Taiwanese authorities helped generate some interesting conversations and potential new pathways for positively changing the dynamics of cross-strait tensions.

There has been a pathway of greater frankness toward China, which started after the July NATO summit communique holding the Chinese regime to account for its role as the key enabler of Russian aggression in Ukraine. China took great umbrage to being called out.

During the week of Sept. 9, the Taiwanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs hosted 11 international journalists for a week-long gathering to receive briefings from different Taiwanese government ministries and think tanks.

This was a unique opportunity for journalists to engage deeply and broadly with Taiwanese centers of governance and influence that are not regularly accessible to non-Taiwanese journalists. It was also an opportunity for journalists to provide observations and feedback to the Taiwanese government and the think tanks that are influential in developing Taiwanese policy.

During the week of dialogue with journalists, several real-world events occurred that reinforced the gravity and urgency of the situation in Taiwan. These included the rare sailing of German warships through the Taiwan Strait to signify the shared resolve of the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
In addition, the United States and the EU put out a joint statement on Taiwan that omitted the “one China” policy statement. Not including this statement is a very significant break and departure from years of routine inclusion. It was likely intended as a message that the placation of China is coming to an end.
Respectfully Transforming Taiwan’s Identity
One interesting discussion was about theoretical views on how Taiwan should be titled on the world stage. The tensions of the Taiwan Strait draw from years of perception and assertion of agendas viewed through titles and symbols from times past that cloud open dialogue in the present.
One point of discussion was perhaps a name change for the country of Taiwan. Its official name, the Republic of China (ROC), causes confusion in many venues. Most recently, the magnificent youth baseball team of Taiwan played in the Little League World Series in the United States, and the American announcers caused a bit of a kerfuffle by referring to them as “Taiwan” instead of the contortion of “Chinese Taipei” created by international lawyers to mollify the Chinese regime. Declaring the new country the “Republic of Taiwan” could show a distinction without implying an immediate departure.

A similar matter could be a new flag. Symbols matter, and the historic ROC flag can ignite images of past conflict. Honorably and respectfully retiring the old colors and transitioning to a new flag could help mend longstanding grudges and animosity with a clear delineation between the past and the present and future. Some older generations may still have emotional attachments, but handling name and flag changes in a dignified manner can help contribute to more constructive dialogue. This also defuses the debate over the meaning of “one China,” which serendipitously was dropped in the aforementioned U.S.–EU communique, a very significant diplomatic step.

Now, with clarity, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) can live uncontested as “one China,” while a new country with 24 million citizens can be allowed. This can also remedy the weaponization and intentional misrepresentation of U.N. Resolution 2758, issued in 1971, which the PRC has used to punish Taiwan. Some of those who actually studied U.N. Resolution 2758 know the action in the resolution removed the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek but did not forbid nor even reference the country of Taiwan.

Setting Aside Past Territorial Claims 

To help assure the PRC of its “one China,” the “Republic of Taiwan” could formally renounce all claims to the mainland. This statement could be an important statement of peaceful coexistence.

One historical event worth mentioning is Edgar Snow’s 1936 interview with Mao Zedong. During this interview, Mao was asked about the status of geographic territories such as Korea after the defeat and withdrawal of Imperial Japan.

The response was fascinating. Mao said about Korea and Taiwan: “We will extend them our enthusiastic help in their struggle for independence. The same things applies [sic] to Formosa.”

This was pointed out by noted China expert Isabel Hilton, who was part of the international journalists’ delegation to Taiwan. The Snow interview is an overlooked part of history. A two-way agreement to cease claims over each other’s territories can help lay the pathway for peaceful coexistence.
PRC Resolves Unpaid Sovereign Debt
Another little-known but large issue is the unpaid sovereign debt of China and its successor, the PRC. Successors are normally responsible for a nation’s unpaid debt. Bonds to China were issued and defaulted upon in 1938 and have never been fully paid off. As part of the UK’s negotiations with the PRC in the 1980s for the transition of Hong Kong, a settlement was made on the UK portion of the debt.
The current value of this unpaid Chinese sovereign debt to the United States is close to $1 trillion. This is sovereign debt, and the U.S. Treasury is still servicing interest payments. Beijing stepping up and taking ownership of this debt will codify the PRC as the leader of the “one China” it seeks, while the other elements, such as new country names, flags, and cessation of claims on each other’s territories, will allow the peaceful existence of Taiwan.

Of course, these issues are difficult, and some people are still passionate about these symbols. However, nothing will change until something changes, and engaging in dialogue on these matters is better than unrestricted if covert warfare, which can lead to open warfare, which no one wants.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

All viewpoints are personal and do not reflect the viewpoints of any organization.

This article first appeared in Epoch Times and was reprinted with permission.

The post John Mills: A Way Forward on Taiwan? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: John Mills

Sheriff Gives Kamala Harris a Rough Welcome as She Arrives in Embattled Border State Arizona

Sheriff Gives Kamala Harris a Rough Welcome as She Arrives in Embattled Border State Arizona

Sheriff Gives Kamala Harris a Rough Welcome as She Arrives in Embattled Border State Arizona
September 29, 2024

The sheriff of the Arizona border county Vice President Kamala Harris visited on Friday had a good reason for talking up a message of conciliation before Harris arrived.

After all, Cochise County Sheriff Mark Dannels knows Harris could well be the next president of the United States.

But for the Harris presidential campaign, and any American who follows the news, the “welcome” Dannels extended had to come across as pretty rough — because nothing really hurts like the truth.

Dannels told the U.K.’s Daily Mail that he was glad to see Harris visiting as at least a step in the right direction.

“If we’re not engaging, we’re not talking, we can’t solve it,” Dannels said, according to the Daily Mail. “So that’s why it’s good that she’s coming, it truly is.”

But he also planned to give her a letter detailing the tragedies the open-border policies Harris has inflicted on the country as part of President Joe Biden’s administration.

“Number one, she is still our sitting vice president,” Dannels told the Daily Mail. “Number two, if she is elected as president, hopefully this will be a foundation that she’ll remember, because I want to share our tragedies, I want to share our reality to her,’ he said.

“I have a letter I’m going to give her when I meet her off she comes off the plane today.

“But the reality is setting all that aside to meet with her. [If] she gets elected, and then she does nothing to fix it. She can’t say she didn’t know about it.”

That’s putting it gently, of course. If Harris doesn’t know about the problems illegal immigration is causing, it’s because she doesn’t want to know about them.

And judging by news coverage of her trip, she didn’t learn much.

According to The Associated Press, Harris visited with local officials — including Dannels — then made a speech that sounded like it could have been given by Barack Obama back in 2012 — a decade before the onslaught of the Biden-Harris immigration invasion.

“I reject the false choice that suggests we must choose either between securing our border and creating a system that is orderly, safe and humane,” Harris said, according to the AP. “We can and we must do both.”

That’s the kind of pablum only the most committed progressives can swallow.

Prior to Joe Biden’s inauguration as president, his predecessor, Donald Trump, was well on the way to securing the border and had obtained the cooperation of the government in Mexico for a system that was “orderly, safe and humane.”

That was the system the Biden-Harris administration blew up. And Dannels can’t help but remind Harris of that.

Now, when it comes to welcoming gifts, a letter — a written record of the faults of the Biden-Harris administration in one hard-hit area of the country — is not exactly a bottle of wine and a dozen roses.

And there’s no doubt the Harris advance team and her political advisers saw Dannels’ statements as nothing but public sniping by a Republican who has previously been publicly scathing about Biden-Harris policies.

But if the atmosphere was poisoned by Dannels’ comments, Harris has only herself and her administration to blame.

The illegal immigration crisis foisted on the country has been a disaster since the beginning of the Biden administration — and it’s one that Harris’ Democratic Party embraces, even as it devastates Democratic-run cities like New York, Chicago, and Boston.

But its first and worst impacts were in the border counties — where lawmen like Dannels and other local officials have been forced to deal with it ever since.

Reminding Harris of that might make for a rough welcome, no matter how gently it’s put in public.

Because when it comes to the modern version of the Democratic Party, the truth tends to hurt — badly.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Sheriff Gives Kamala Harris a Rough Welcome as She Arrives in Embattled Border State Arizona appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Joe Saunders, The Western Journal

Tampon Tim Wears His Stolen Valor Cap at Michigan Game – Grabs His Sack for the Cameras

Tampon Tim Wears His Stolen Valor Cap at Michigan Game – Grabs His Sack for the Cameras

Tampon Tim Wears His Stolen Valor Cap at Michigan Game – Grabs His Sack for the Cameras
September 29, 2024

Tampon Tim attended the Michigan-Minnesota game on Saturday in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Football fans waited out in the rain to boo Tampon Tim at the game.

Michigan Fans Wait in the Rain to Boo Tampon Tim at Big House on Saturday

Tim Walz wore his Army Special Forces hat at the Big Ten football game today.

Here is the Army Special Forces emblem.

And here is Tim Walz in his Army Special Forces hat.

Tim Walz poses with campaign workers at the Michigan game in Ann Arbor on Saturday. Walz is wearing an Army Special Forces hat tonight - a position he never held.

Via Amuse: Walz has never been in the unit and he's been asked repeatedly to quit wearing the hat and pretending like he was Army Special Forces.

This guy is too much.

Tampon Tim was also caught grabbing his sack on camera.

At least it makes him smile.

Tim Walz grabs his sack at the Michigan game.

Video via Johnny MAGA.

The post Tampon Tim Wears His Stolen Valor Cap at Michigan Game – Grabs His Sack for the Cameras appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hoft

Sheriffs in Arizona Counties Refuse to Enforce State Law Making it a Crime for Migrants to Illegally Cross into the U.S. if Passed

Sheriffs in Arizona Counties Refuse to Enforce State Law Making it a Crime for Migrants to Illegally Cross into the U.S. if Passed

Sheriffs in Arizona Counties Refuse to Enforce State Law Making it a Crime for Migrants to Illegally Cross into the U.S. if Passed
September 29, 2024

A U.S. Border Patrol agent uses personal protective equipment as he prepares to take a photo of an individual encountered near Sasabe, Ariz. on March 22, 2020. CBP Photo by Jerry Glaser

Arizona sheriffs are causing a political firestorm by refusing to enforce a proposed state law that would criminalize illegal crossings at the Arizona-Mexico border.

Proposition 314, set to appear on November’s ballot, seeks to empower local authorities to arrest and prosecute migrants who enter the U.S. illegally.

According to the Arizona legislature’s website:

Proposition 314 would establish criminal penalties against a person who is not lawfully present in the United States and who submits false documentation when both applying for public benefits and during the employment eligibility verification process. An entity that accepts public benefits applications would have to verify the person’s identity by using a federal verification database.

Proposition 314 would make it a class 2 felony for a person to knowingly sell fentanyl if the person knows that the drug being sold contains fentanyl, that the fentanyl was not lawfully manufactured or imported into the United States and that the drug caused the death of another person.

Proposition 314 would establish state crimes related to entering this state from a location that is not a lawful port of entry or not complying with an order to leave this state.

These sheriffs, who oversee counties along Arizona’s southern border, are citing everything from “budgetary concerns” to accusations of “racism” as reasons for not enforcing the new law.

David Hathaway, sheriff of Santa Cruz County, a border region home to one of the largest ports of entry, made the audacious claim that enforcing the law would be “racist,” according to The Guardian.

“It would be ridiculous for me to go up to practically every single person in my county and say, ‘Let me see your papers, I need to check your immigration status’,” said Hathaway.

It’s not just Democrats like Hathaway shirking their duties. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos, also a Democrat, declared he would refuse to enforce the law if passed.

Chris Nanos echoed Hathaway’s sentiments, warning that enforcing the new law would lead to “racial profiling.”

The real question is: since when did enforcing the law become optional?

Nanos argues that it would be too expensive for his department to arrest and detain illegal migrants.

“If I book a migrant in my county jail, I’m paying for those costs without any funding from the state,” said Nanos.

“Who wants to do this silly law with no funding from the federal government? But here’s another caveat that I’ve seen for a couple of decades: the federal government on the border doesn’t have enough courts, therefore they don’t have enough judges, they don’t have enough attorneys.”

“I’m not going to allow my deputies to be on that border, to arrest people, to book them in our jail when we have a federal government that has that responsibility. They should have solved it years ago. And now they have an opportunity to do real legislation in Washington, DC that says, ‘hey, we need to redo our immigration policies’ … the problem today is that Washington will never resolve it.”

The Guardian reported:

The Biden administration in June issued a new directive to curb high levels of migration into the US, which led to a dramatic decrease in unofficial border crossings in the following months.

The Cochise county sheriff, Mark Dannels, said: “I understand the spirit and the intent behind Proposition 314. And I think it will pass because the majority of the citizens in this state want a change.”

However, Dannels, a Republican, added: “Will I enforce the law? That’s like saying I’m not going to enforce DUI [driving under the influence] laws because I just don’t believe in that. No, you have to enforce the will of the people. I and other sheriffs are just trying to prepare ourselves before it passes because we don’t have infrastructure. We don’t have the funding, we don’t have the personnel.”

Meanwhile, in Yuma county, on the western end of the Arizona-Mexico border, the sheriff, Leon Wilmot, declined to speak with the Guardian. But at an earlier stage of the law’s passage through the legislature, Wilmot, a Republican, told a local ABC News affiliate that: “It will break the budget. And our county doesn’t have the revenue to be able to handle that.”

The post Sheriffs in Arizona Counties Refuse to Enforce State Law Making it a Crime for Migrants to Illegally Cross into the U.S. if Passed appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft

Thousands Of Iraqis Attempt to Storm US Embassy in Baghdad Following Hezbollah Leader’s Targeting Killing

Thousands Of Iraqis Attempt to Storm US Embassy in Baghdad Following Hezbollah Leader’s Targeting Killing

Thousands Of Iraqis Attempt to Storm US Embassy in Baghdad Following Hezbollah Leader’s Targeting Killing
September 29, 2024

Iraqi Shiites protest in Baghdad against the US following the targeted assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. Twitter screengrab

As reported at The Gateway Pundit, Hezbollah terrorist group leader Hassan Nasrallah is now dead. Apparently, this didn’t go over so well among Shiite Muslims in Baghdad. According to Geller Report, thousands of Iraqis attempted to storm the US embassy in Baghdad.

On her blog Pamela Geller says, “Videos show protesters clashing with security forces in riot gear can be seen among the large crowd, along with flags of Iran-backed militias in Iraq known as the Popular Mobilization Force.”

One Twitter account described these rioters as Hezbollah-affiliated.

Another pointed out, “Harris may have a Benghazi-like disaster on her hands unless something is done quickly. Pray for our embassy staff, their families, and those tasked with protecting them.”

While our embassy seems to be safe as of now this highlight yet again how the Iraq war was a disaster creating civil unrest in Iraq and allowing the Mullahs in Iran to add it to their Islamist sphere of influence.

More from Baghdad.

A Shiite leader threatened to burn down the US Embassy.

The post Thousands Of Iraqis Attempt to Storm US Embassy in Baghdad Following Hezbollah Leader’s Targeting Killing appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Seth Segal