Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Just Became Crypto Fraudster Sam Bankman Fried’s Prison Bunkmate
September 25, 2024
The crypto fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried has a new roommate.
Following his arrest last week on sex trafficking charges, Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs was reportedly placed in the same housing unit as Bankman-Fried at a federal detention center in Brooklyn.
Combs and SBF, as Fried is commonly known, are both being held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
The sources describe the unit as a barrack-style area currently housing about 18-20 inmates. These inmates range from high profile defendants, like Combs, to cooperators — inmates who may require special protection.
The area is separate from the overall general population unit, but is common/shared living space, sources tell NBC New York.
Combs was denied bail last week as he awaits trial on the federal charges. The music mogul has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty at his arraignment. He has remained in custody in New York City since his arrest Sept. 16 at his Manhattan hotel by federal agents.
Prison authorities have refused to confirm the reports, citing security reasons.
“For privacy, safety, and security reasons the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP) does not provide information about conditions of confinement, including housing assignments or internal security practices for any particular incarcerated individual,” the FBOP said in a statement.
Unfortunately for Bankman-Fried, Diddy is unlikely in the mood to be making new friends. According to People magazine, he has recently been placed on suicide watch amid concerns about his mental condition.
Appearing in court last week, the 54-year-old music mogul plead not guilty to a litany of serious crimes including sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation to engage in prostitution.
THE DIRTY LIES OF 60 MINUTES: Far Left News Mag Claims Rosanne Boyland Died from Drug Overdose on January 6 – Refuses to Show Video of Police Pummeling Rosanne’s Body as She Laid on the Cement Dying
September 25, 2024
On September 16, 2024, the vile far-left hacks on 60 Minutes ran a political ad for the Kamala Harris’s campaign on the January 6 protests. The segment was the disgusting hit piece on President Trump just weeks before the 2024 election.
There was no opportunity for the Trump Team to respond to the myriad of lies and mistruths presented in the segment.
The news magazine continued to spew their tired lies about what actually took place that day at the US Capitol.
For one, 60 Minutes will never admit in 1,000 years that General Mark Milley ignored his superior, President Trump’s request for the National Guard to be deployed to the US Capitol days before the rallies and protests.
60 Minutes will never report the truth that Nancy Pelosi refused President Trump’s request to deploy the National Guard to the US Capitol days before the rallies and protests.
60 Minutes will NEVER REPORT that if the National Guard was deployed to the US Capitol that day there never would have been a riot.
The insurrection was of Pelosi’s making. 60 Minutes will never report the truth.
60 Minutes then repeated the disgusting lies about the four Trump supporters who were killed that day after police started firing on the crowd and beating protesters.
"One of his supporters was killed by an officer defending the House chamber. Three other Trump supporters died that day—one drug overdose—two from cardiovascular disease. And a police officer died of a stroke the next day. In the debate, Mr. Trump acknowledged one death, but he said this in August."
Here's the screengrab.
Four Americans died that day and 60 Minutes glossed it over like your average Sunday walk in the park.
In reality, two men, Kevin Greeson and Benjamin Phillips died in the crowd around the time Capitol Police started firing exploding sound grenades without warning.
The third protester killed that day—Ashli Babbitt—was famously shot dead by Lt. Mike Byrd in cold blood inside the US Capitol.
And protester Rosanne Boyland was killed by police.
Rosanne was pushed down, trampled, smothered, and then beaten by a Capitol Police officer with a stick as she died.
Michael Cohen Says Trump Winning Would Force Him to Leave The Country and Create a Fake Identity (VIDEO)
September 25, 2024
Donald Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen has said he will leave the country and change his identity if the former president wins in November.
During an interview on MSNBC’s Deadline with Nicolle Wallace, Cohen said he had “no choice” but to prepare for the worst.
Here is a transcript of the exchange:
WALLACE: “What do you think happens to you if he wins?” asked Wallace.
COHEN: I’m out of here. I’m already working on a foreign passport with a completely different name. I don’t know how it is going to work as far as dealing with my wife and my children. I certainly don’t want them moving to where I’m looking to go.
I don’t think you or the president of the MSNBC, General Milley, Liz Cheney are safe. How many people has he turned around and said that these are people that I intend to go after if I have the ability to?
And the worst is the Supreme Court’s recent decision that gave him immunity, presidential immunity. Now he thinks it is not only can I do whatever I want, but I can’t even be prosecuted to get out of jail free card.
WALLACE: So you’re out of here? Would you leave the country?
COHEN: I have no choice.
Watch the clip below:
Cohen, who is a convicted perjurer and self-admitted thief, claimed that Trump was planning to assassinate his political enemies if he returns to the White House next year.
“So they think that they are going to hitch themselves to his wagon in hopes that they are going to elevate themselves whether it is in power, through money, through connections and so forth, it does not work that way,” Cohen said Trump’s most prominent supporters.
“He will not allow that and just like Putin, once you start to get too big for your own britches, people will start flying out of windows, they will end up in gulags,” he continued. “As Donald says all the time, send them to Gitmo, send them to Guantanamo Bay.”
Exposing the Hypocrisy: How January 6th Defendants Face Weaponized Legal System While the Powerful Hide Behind Immunity
September 25, 2024
The legal system in Washington, D.C., has been weaponized against January 6th defendants like AJ Fischer, while the powerful figures responsible for the security failures on that day are hiding behind legal immunity.
Fischer, who is suing Mayor Muriel Bowser, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and others for their failures in securing the Capitol, faces a legal wall built on repeated invocations of immunity.
These same officials, who claim “no one is above the law,” have used legal immunity to dodge any responsibility for their own actions—a move that reeks of hypocrisy.
The government attorneys representing District officials, including Bowser and the Metropolitan Police Department, invoked immunity 16 times in their motion to dismiss Fischer’s case.
Likewise, the attorneys representing the U.S. government defendants, including Nancy Pelosi, used immunity 14 times in their reply brief (AJ Immunity DC OPPOSITION). While these officials point the finger at Donald Trump and his allies, they demand protection from the same justice they claim to serve.
The Department of Justice (DOJ), under Merrick Garland, has made a mockery of impartial justice.
Instead of holding accountable those who had the power to prevent the chaos, the DOJ has gone after Trump allies like Steve Bannon, who was thrown in jail for contempt of Congress over a politically charged investigation.
Meanwhile, Pelosi, Bowser, and their colleagues, who turned down President Trump’s offer of National Guard troops before January 6th, face no consequences thanks to their strategic use of immunity.
Garland’s DOJ has not prosecuted a single person who has committed blatant perjury in the so-called Select Committee testimony or in the United States Federal Courthouse while testifying against January 6th defendants.
The same DOJ that aggressively pursues Trump’s allies has allowed these individuals to perjure themselves with impunity, all in the name of political expediency.
This selective prosecution is not justice—it’s lawfare, pure and simple.
But this isn’t just about Bannon. The DOJ has been pursuing Peter Navarro and other Trump supporters with zeal, while the real failures that led to the events of January 6th are shielded.
The courts in D.C. have joined in this selective justice, handing out harsh sentences to non-violent protesters while violent criminals in other cities are given leniency.
Immunity for the Elite, Lawfare for the People
AJ Fischer’s lawsuit highlights the gross double standards that define today’s legal landscape.
Fischer alleges that Pelosi and Bowser, with the authority to accept National Guard assistance, made the calculated decision to refuse it, leaving the Capitol exposed.
They are the ones responsible for the chaos that unfolded, but instead of being held accountable, they’ve been able to hide behind the legal shields of immunity.
At the same time, non-violent January 6th defendants are being dragged through politically charged prosecutions and handed outrageous prison sentences for simply being present at the Capitol.
The courts have become complicit, protecting the elites while persecuting average Americans.
Condemned USA: The Fight for Justice
Thankfully, organizations like Condemned USA are stepping in where the justice system has failed.
Founded by Treniss Evans, Condemned USA is fighting tirelessly to expose the legal double standards that have been applied to January 6th defendants.
Through advocacy, legal support, and relentless efforts to shed light on the truth, Condemned USA is holding the powerful accountable and ensuring that the voices of those who have been unjustly prosecuted are heard.
In Evans’s own words:
"The justice system we once believed in has become a tattered remnant, much like the starry-eyed vision of America that now only remains in our memories. It was these ideals that made our nation great, a heartbeat that echoed through our country. Even through our mistakes and shortcomings, we held tight to those beliefs. And while they may have seemed to fade over time, the silver lining is that those patriotic ideals, once smoldering, are now being reignited into a blaze—emboldened by the great leaders of our time."
Through Condemned USA’s efforts, the light of justice is being reignited, and the fight for accountability continues.
Fischer’s case represents just one part of a much larger battle to restore fairness and integrity to our legal system.
A Call to Action: Support AJ Fischer’s Civil Complaint and the Proud Boys’ Last Stand
The time to act is now. AJ Fischer’s lawsuit is more than just a fight for justice—it’s a critical stand against the lies and manipulation that have defined the narrative around January 6th.
Fischer is not just standing up for himself; he is standing up for all Americans who believe in truth, accountability, and the values that once made this country great.
His civil complaint represents a powerful challenge to the deceit and double standards perpetuated by those in power.
Supporting Fischer’s civil complaint to take down these lies and expose the false narrative will empower him as part of the Proud Boys' last stand against the political weaponization of the justice system. But he cannot do it alone.
By contributing to Fischer’s fundraising campaign, you will help secure the legal support he needs to continue this vital battle.
This isn’t just a legal fight—it’s a fight for the soul of our justice system and the future of free speech and fair representation.
Join the movement. Stand with AJ Fischer and the Proud Boys in their courageous effort to take on the powerful forces that have weaponized the law for their own gain.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.