In a bombshell revelation during an appearance on Sara Gonzales Unfiltered, investigative journalist Steve Baker has accused General Mark Milley, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, of authorizing the use of heat and sound-directed energy weapons against protesters during the violent riots that rocked Washington, D.C., in the summer of 2020.

Baker claims to have photographic evidence to substantiate these allegations, with a full exposé promised in the coming days.

It can be recalled that during the summer of 2020, a series of protests and riots erupted across the United States following the death of George Floyd.

These events, often referred to as the “Summer of Love,” resulted in significant loss of life and property damage.

By early June 2020, at least 19 deaths were reported in connection with the protests nationwide.

114 police officers were assaulted at the Capitol Hill protests. 180 police officers were assaulted and injured during the BLM riots in Washington, DC in the summer of 2020.

Over 700 police officers were injured in the BLM riots nationally — and that was just the first half of 2020!

Between May 26 and June 8, 2020, the riots caused an estimated $1–2 billion in insured property damage across 140 U.S. cities in 20 states, making it the costliest civil unrest in U.S. history.

Speaking to host Sara Gonzales, Baker detailed the alleged deployment of heat and sound-directed energy weapons during the Summer of Love.

According to Baker, these weapons—capable of emitting both super audible and subaudible frequencies—can be used for crowd control or, more ominously, as tools to incite agitation and violence.

Sara Gonzales:
You keep coming up with these scoops regarding January 6. Do you have anything else that’s coming up?

Steve Baker:
Yeah, pay very close attention to probably… I thought it was going to be out today, but we got a couple of little things we got to clean up on a new article. We know for a fact now that General Mark Milley, who is the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, back under the previous Trump administration, we know that in June of 2020, during the riot in the Summer of Love here in DC, he actually directed, ordered, and authorized the use of both heat and sound-directed energy weapons to be used against the protesters in that event. We have the photography now to prove it, to back it up. We’re going to be coming out with that story tomorrow. Then we’ll be launching a series off of that first article that will lead us to January 6 as well.

Sara Gonzales:
Which just heat and sound, which would do what?

Steve Baker:
Well, it depends upon which switch is used. It depends. If they are using sound energy weapons, they can be super audible or they can be subaudible. If they’re set to super audible, that’s supposed to scare people away from a riot. If they’re set to subaudible, it can make people go crazy in their head and force them into violence. They call those agitation weapons.

Sara Gonzales:
I’m going to go back and rewind about 10 minutes ago when I said that I believe January 6 was total entrapment by the United States government in order to weaponize their own agencies against their people. I’m just going to go ahead and rewind, and I’m going to say that again, and I’m going to go ahead and double down on that at this point, Steve.

Steve Baker:
You probably have valid reasons to feel the way you feel.

WATCH:

BOMBSHELL @TPC4USA says he has evidence that General Mark Milley authorized the use of heat and sound directed energy weapons during the 2020 riots.

These can be used to agitate people & turn them violent.

If they were used in the summer of love, were they used on J6?? pic.twitter.com/3TuIKY15vT

— Sara Gonzales (@SaraGonzalesTX) January 7, 2025

The post Explosive Claim: Journalist Steve Baker Alleges Gen. Mark Milley Approved Heat and Sound Directed Energy Weapons During 2020 Riots — Claims He Has Evidence to Prove It appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

As reported last Friday, Americans are in a hopeful mood. A majority of Americans are optimistic about President Trump’s agenda for America.

President Trump won a historic landslide election in November, sweeping all of the battleground states, winning back the US Senate, keeping the US House in Republican hands, and winning more legitimate votes than any candidate in US history.

With his popularity, it is safe to say President Trump could have the largest audience ever to see him speak on Inauguration Day.

After surviving TWO assassination attempts, 90 bogus felony charges, numerous lawfare suits, and more, Donald Trump will go down in the history books as one of the greatest leaders in world history.

So it was surprising to The Gateway Pundit to find out that millions of middle-class and working-class Americans, the backbone of Trump’s base, were finding it nearly impossible to obtain tickets for his historic second Inauguration.

• So, where did all the inaugural tickets go?
• Was it still possible to attend the inauguration?
• Were there other options available without a ticket?
• Who is holding this information and why are they keeping it to themselves?
• Why is this information not being shared with Trump supporters?
• Who made the decision to exclude Trump’s loyal base?
• And, is the President aware of this growing controversy?

On Friday, I released a compelling video addressing these concerns after The Gateway Pundit encountered the same roadblocks. Despite reaching out to over 20 officials and insiders, it has become evident how challenging it is to secure one of these coveted “golden tickets” to Trump’s inauguration.

From the video, I describe how The Gateway Pundit has reached out to at least 20 different channels to request tickets to the inauguration and still had no answers!

I also describe the hundreds of thousands of Trump supporters who are asking the same question: How do I get a ticket to the Trump Inauguration?

TODAY WE HAVE ANSWERS!

Our Friday report made some waves with the Trump Inauguration Team.

They were not happy that The Gateway Pundit was reporting on this issue despite the fact that it concerned tens of thousands of concerned Trump supporters.

On Saturday, we heard back regarding our viral post on Friday.

We were told this:

• You CAN get tickets from the t47inaugural.com website.
• Over 60,000 tickets have already been requested on the website.
• The inauguration is open to the public, and enthusiasm is high.
• There are two staffers reaching out to volunteer groups.

As we reported, tens of thousands of Trump supporters are completely confused about how to get tickets to the Trump Inauguration.

We then heard that high-up officials (we do not have names) on the inaugural team wanted to know our questions.

So we responded with our questions:

• Simple Question: How do we get tickets to the inauguration?
• How do we communicate this to our 2 million daily readers who are also struggling to get tickets.
• Are they purposely trying to limit participation at the Inauguration this year?

And this is what we heard back—and this could be helpful for The Gateway Pundit readers:

• Those who sought tickets from the website and may have signed up weeks ago will receive information this week. They assured us that this is the traditional timeframe—to wait several weeks to notify supporters that they have a ticket to the Inauguration.
• They then informed The Gateway Pundit that “only a small part of the inaugural ceremony is ticketed – the rest is open and you do not need tickets.” Of course, this is something that has NOT been communicated well with the Trump base for several weeks now!
• They added that we can tell our readers that President-elect Trump and Vice President-elect would welcome them to be there at the swearing-in and along the parade route if they want to. They will not need a ticket for this!

Anyway…

HERE IS HOW YOU CAN ATTEND THE HISTORIC SECOND INAUGURATION OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

Since we posted our video last Friday, we have received numerous pieces of information on how Trump supporters can attend his Second Inaugural on January 20, 2025.

Many of our readers and friends told us that they were not able to get a ticket to the inauguration from their congressman or congresswoman. They assumed, like we did, that this meant they could not attend the inauguration.

That is not correct. You can attend. You can attend the inauguration and stand in the mall behind the ticketed attendees.

Here is a map of the 2025 Inaugural.

The special guests will sit up in sections 1 through 16.

Behind the special guests, there is a standing room for more special guests.

Then behind the reflecting pool is the section for over 60,000 ticketed attendees.

If you did not obtain a ticket—like many of us, so far—you can stand in the mall in the sections behind the ticketed attendees.

There is another website, the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies (JCCIC) website.

The inaugural.senate.gov does answer a few questions they leave you with more questions.

Here are the Frequently Asked Questions:

How can I get tickets to attend the Inaugural Swearing-In Ceremonies of the President-elect and Vice President-elect?
Ticket allocation and distribution is coordinated through U.S. Congressional Member offices. Please check with the Senator or Representative of your home state for tickets. You can find your Congressional Members here.

Non-ticketed viewing areas on the National Mall west of 4th Street NW will also be open to the public.

How can I get tickets to attend the Inaugural Balls?
The official Inaugural Balls are organized by the Presidential Inaugural Committee (PIC). The PIC will release information about the Inaugural Balls on its website here.

Most Trump supporters had heard that you needed a ticket to attend the inauguration. That is what we heard.

This senate.gov site confirms you do not need a ticket to attend.

This website also has information for media outlets looking for access to cover the event.

There is also a website called Inaugural Tickets. This outlet charges Trump supporters for access to the Inaugural events. It is NOT the official website.

So you can still make plans to attend the historic Trump Inauguration. It’s not too late!

Thanks to our readers and our amazing contact, who generously spent his time helping us get more answers from the Trump Inaugural team.

We hope to see you there on January 20th to witness history!

The post IT’S NOT TOO LATE! Here’s How You Can Attend Inauguration and Make History with Largest Crowd Ever for President Trump appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Researchers from the University of Toronto have documented a rare instance of gigantomastia—abnormal and excessive breast growth—following the administration of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

A 19-year-old woman, previously healthy with no notable medical history, experienced rapid breast enlargement just one week after receiving her first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in September 2022.

Her condition worsened following the second dose, with her breast size increasing dramatically from a B cup to a triple G over six months.

Social media users have dubbed this unusual case the “Pfizer Boob Job.”

Despite undergoing extensive medical evaluations, no hormonal abnormalities or other causes were identified.

Doctors determined that the woman’s symptoms aligned with pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH), a rare condition involving idiopathic fibrous mammary tissue growth.

The association between PASH and vaccine administration has not been previously established, making this case particularly noteworthy.

According to the medical journal:

This case presents a healthy young woman with rapid bilateral breast enlargement 1 week following Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine administration. After ruling out other potential causes, she underwent bilateral reduction mammoplasty, with histology revealing dense terminal duct lobular units interspersed with PASH.

The patient believed that the vaccine caused her breast growth; however, her concerns were not adequately addressed by her primary care physicians, leading to mistrust in the healthcare system.

After multiple specialist consultations and unsuccessful medication trials, she underwent definitive surgical treatment. Although a temporal relationship does not establish causality, dismissing patient concerns can erode trust. Physicians should consider and value patient concerns when developing therapeutic relationships.

PASH-associated gigantomastia is rare, with fewer than 20 documented cases. Current gigantomastia classification systems do not account for PASH as an etiological factor and lack detail on the timeline of breast growth or the type of tissue involved. Including these elements could improve clinical decision-making and streamline management.

Further research is needed to develop a comprehensive classification system for gigantomastia that assists in treatment planning and a deepens understanding of PASH.

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of gigantomastia remains unclear. Here, we present the case of a healthy female patient who experienced rapid breast enlargement, progressing from a B cup to a triple G cup over 6 months, beginning 1 week following Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination.

She underwent bilateral reduction mammoplasty, complicated by intraoperative bleeding, necessitating postoperative transfusions. Surgical specimens confirmed PASH. Further research is needed to understand PASH etiology, refine gigantomastia classification, and explore the potential link between the Pfizer vaccine, gigantomastia, and PASH.

The post 19-Year-Old’s Breasts Balloon from B Cup to Triple G After Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine — Researchers Call It First-of-its-Kind Case appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Biden administration not only used the Justice Department to target President Trump and other prominent Republicans or outspoken conservatives but also went after the attorneys who represented them.

“If we don’t put an end to this pernicious lawfare, we will destroy the rule of law and the adversarial system of justice—and that, of course, is their intent,” said John Eastman, an attorney and academic who serves as a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute, a conservative think tank.

Eastman’s career was derailed, and his life turned upside down, as a result of his efforts to persuade Mike Pence to refuse to certify the 2020 election results in January 2021.

The United States Democracy Center reported that John Eastman was disbarred following a bipartisan bar complaint signed by 25 prominent figures, including former federal and California state supreme court judges, Republican officials, leading law professors, and ethics advisors from the George W. Bush and Obama administrations.

The complaint accused Eastman of violating his professional responsibilities as an attorney by filing baseless claims, making false statements, and engaging in deceptive practices in his efforts to keep Donald Trump in power after the 2020 election.

This included his involvement in the Texas v. Pennsylvania lawsuit, his role in inciting the crowd at Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally, and his legally unfounded plan to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject valid electoral votes, effectively disenfranchising millions of voters.

It seems unusual for an attorney to be vilified simply for participating in a lawsuit. Eastman believes the Justice Department’s harsh stance toward conservatives and their attorneys is a deliberate attempt to deter future legal challenges.

“They’ve explicitly said they want to make these lawyers so toxic that no one will take on these kinds of cases again,” Eastman remarked.

“You cannot have an adversarial system of justice when one side can’t find lawyers to represent them.”

Attorney Robert Previto, who has been practicing law in New York for nearly 30 years, echoed concerns about the politicization of government agencies and the courts under the Biden administration.

“Eastman and Giuliani are both correct in many of their observations about the weaponization of government agencies and the courts,” he stated.

Previto warned of the grave consequences of such actions, emphasizing, “We cannot survive as a republic, individual liberty cannot survive, if our courts and our government abandon their historical neutrality toward those not in power and instead set their dangerous sights on prosecuting political opponents.”

Mr. Eastman criticized what he described as a striking example of projection in politics, claiming that Democrats in 2024 accused Donald Trump of planning to weaponize the Department of Justice if re-elected, while they had done so themselves during the past four years.

“One of the greatest examples of what psychologists call projection,” he argued, “is the Democrats accusing Trump of wanting to weaponize the Department of Justice. And I’m sorry, that’s what’s been going on the last four years.”

He added that he had been “one of the prime victims of it, second only to President Trump.”

Eastman accused prosecutors of creatively misusing criminal statutes to target conduct that traditionally falls outside their scope.

He pointed to the Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. United States, which ruled that prosecutors had overreached in applying an obstruction statute—originally designed for addressing document tampering—to individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riots.

In that case, the Court determined the law’s intended application was too narrow to encompass the broad use it had been given.

Eastman also criticized state-level prosecutors like Fani Willis in Georgia and Attorney General Kris Mayes in Arizona for allegedly stretching the boundaries of conspiracy and forgery statutes to criminalize conduct he believes does not warrant such charges.

“They’re creatively using criminal statutes to cover conduct that’s never been treated as covered by those statutes,” he contended, drawing parallels to the overreach struck down in the Fischer case.

The Fischer case serves as a key example in John Eastman’s argument about prosecutorial overreach in lawfare.

The Supreme Court ruled that obstruction statutes, initially intended for document tampering, could not be broadly applied to January 6 rioters without clear evidence of their actions affecting official records or proceedings.

Eastman points to this decision to illustrate his claim that prosecutors are stretching the boundaries of criminal laws to target conduct that does not traditionally fall under these statutes.

Attorney Robert Previto highlighted the dangers of what he described as “lawfare” by a sitting administration, warning of its potential to erode democratic principles.

He explained that totalitarianism, which he defined as “one-party rule or simply repression,” often begins by manipulating the scope of criminal statutes to target political opponents.

“This is done to stop them from speaking and acting—actions they are wholly entitled to—and to simultaneously chill the speech and actions of others who oppose the policies or even the party in power,” Previto said.

He cited the cases of Eastman, Giuliani, and Trump as examples of this tactic, stating that it starts “under the color of existing law” but ultimately stretches the application of criminal statutes to a breaking point.

“When this happens,” Previto warned, “the law loses its meaning—and its purpose—and becomes nothing less than a fulcrum for those in power to disempower the people.”

The post Biden Regime’s Lawfare: An Interview with John Eastman appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

French President Emmanuel Macron has never seen worse days in his political life.

He leads a train-wreck minority government, has had 4 different Prime Ministers in a year, economy sucks, violence spiking, immigration of course out of control, farmers in constant state of revolt against suicidal ‘green’ policies…

61% of French in last poll want him to resign.

The French post-colonial world is also crumbling, and their troops have been expelled from the African countries of Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, Chad, Senegal, and Ivory Coast.

But hey, the former Rothschild banker thinks he has the cachet to go around lecturing the world. Time and time again.

So now, Macron came out guns blazing on a number of issues that all had in common one feature: they are not his business.

Let’s begin with his new U-turn on Ukraine.

Politico reported:

“French President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday that Ukraine needs to adopt a ‘realistic’ stance on territorial issues as political momentum appears to gather in favor of opening peace talks with Russia.

This is the first time Macron has hinted that Kyiv should consider territorial concessions, having in the past repeatedly called for Ukraine’s territorial integrity to be preserved in any negotiations to end the war.”

“’The Ukrainians need to have realistic discussions on territorial issues, which they alone can do’, he said during a speech to French ambassadors gathered in Paris.”

Besides Crime that they conquered in 2014, Russians now control about 20% of former Ukrainian territories, and more: they held referendums and enshrined the regions in their Constitution as new regions. There’s no going back.

Macron must be pissed that he trained and armed, spent a billion Euros from tax-payers on a brand-new brigade – only for 1700 soldiers to go AWOL before firing a single shot.

For Macron, the US should ‘bring Russia to the negotiation table’, but Europeans will provide Ukraine with ‘security guarantees’ as their responsibility.

But Macron still had more opinions to share: this time, he was to repeat the tired old adage about how dangerous it is when conservatives support each other international allies. His attack on Elon Musk is as pitiful as one would expect.

“Who would have thought, if we had been told that the owner of one of the largest social networks in the world would support the new international reactionary movement and intervene directly in elections.”

BREAKING: Macron accuses Elon Musk of election interference.

“Who would have thought, if we had been told that the owner of one of the largest social networks in the world would support the new international reactionary movement and intervene directly in elections.” pic.twitter.com/OcFLQ9du08

— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) January 6, 2025

Read more:

HOW LOW CAN MACRON GO? New Opinion Poll Reveals the Most Dismal Numbers for Failing French President – 71% Worried by Him, 61% Support His Immediate Ousting

The post Embattled Macron Deflects From France’s Manifold Crises by Lecturing Other Countries — Says Ukraine Must Be ‘Realistic’ and Cede Territory, Complains of Musk ‘Interference’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.