BREAKING: President Trump Weighs In on Mike Rogers Leading the FBI Following Grassroots Uproar
November 22, 2024
Michigan Republican U.S. Senate nominee Mike Rogers speaks at a rally by President Trump in Warren, Michigan, November 1, 2024, photo by Kristinn Taylor.
The internet exploded this week with rumors that former GOP Rep. Mike Rogers was being considered as FBI Chief by President-elect Donald Trump in his second term.
Mike Rogers recently lost his senate race in Michigan following a late night ballot dump that gave the race to unpopular Democrat Elissa Slotkin in Michigan. Rogers did not question the results and congratulated Slotkin in her win in a state that went for President Trump by nearly 80,000 votes.
Maybe Rogers did not complain about his loss since he was very vocal trashing President Trump in 2020 for contesting the highly controversial and improbable results of the 2020 election.
Recently, shocking comments by Rogers have resurfaced exposing his allegiance to the security state.
Here is Mike Rogers joking about have Eric Snowden assassinated for exposing deep state operations.
There’s literally no worse appointment possible than choosing Mike Rogers for FBI Director, or for any government position.
He’s the single most devoted loyalist to the US Security State and all of its multi-faceted abuses. It doesn’t get worse than Mike Rogers. https://t.co/HNU6GZx8p2
Rogers also went on NPR to argue that the “Nunes Memo” that revealed illegal FBI spying on the Trump campaign and his family members, should be suppressed.
There’s literally no worse appointment possible than choosing Mike Rogers for FBI Director, or for any government position.
He’s the single most devoted loyalist to the US Security State and all of its multi-faceted abuses. It doesn’t get worse than Mike Rogers. https://t.co/HNU6GZx8p2
Deep State hack and Trump-hater Andrew McCabe endorsed Mike Rogers Thursday night on CNN.
McCabe told Kaitlan Collins,
Andrew McCabe: “Kaitlin, I think Mike Rogers is a totally reasonable, logical selection for FBI director. In fact, that’s the decision President-elect Trump makes. I had many interactions with then-representative Rogers during his time as Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
He’s, as you mentioned, someone with history with the FBI. He understands the organization. He served as an FBI agent for several years before he went off on his political career. In his capacity in the House, I think that the strongest qualification, in my own opinion, about Mr. Rogers is the respect and awareness and knowledge that he has for the intelligence community, for the work they do, for the seriousness of that work, for how those secrets and that sensitive information needs to be protected. In all those counts, I think Mike Rogers fills the bill pretty well.
That should end the discussion about Mike Rogers taking over the FBI right there.
Talk about a red flag warning?
Mike Rogers would be a horrible pick for FBI Chief. Who in Trump’s orbit is pushing this guy?
On Friday morning Dan Scavino put an end to all of the speculation about Mike Rogers as FBI Chief.
Dan Scavino is a longtime Trump adviser adviser who served in the Trump administration as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications from 2020 to 2021, and Director of Social Media from 2017 to 2021.
This morning Dan posted this to squelch the frenzy over Mike Rogers.
Dan Scavino: Just spoke to President Trump regarding Mike Rogers going to the FBI. It’s not happening — In his own words, “I have never even given it a thought.” Not happening.
Just spoke to President Trump regarding Mike Rogers going to the FBI. It’s not happening — In his own words, “I have never even given it a thought.” Not happening.
Angela Merkel Admits Trump’s Victory ‘Filled Her With Sadness,’ Says Elon Musk’s Influence a ‘Huge Concern’
November 22, 2024
Former German chancellor Angela Merkel has admitted that Trump’s spectacular election victory had “filled her with sadness” about the state of global politics.
Merkel, who served as channcelor of Germany for 16 year and remains the living embodiment of globalist ideology, made the remarks in an interview with the left-wing German newspaper Der Spiegel published on Friday ahead of her upcoming memoir’s release.
According to Reuters, Merkel admitted that Trump’s win had “filled her with sadness” and made the globalist worldview harder to implement.
If someone in politics does not allow for win-win situations but only ever recognizes winners and losers, then that is a very difficult task for multilateralism,” she said.
Merkel, who stepped down in 2021 having flooded her once thriving country with illegal immigrants, also expressed concern about Elon Musk and his influence on the forthcoming administration.
If this ultimate recourse is influenced too strongly by companies, whether through capital power or technological capabilities, then that is an unprecedented challenge for all of us,” Merkel explained.
“If a person like him [Musk] owns 60% of all satellites orbiting in space, then that has to be a huge concern for us in addition to the political issues,” she continued.
In her memoir, Merkel also reflected on the moment where Donald Trump appeared to decline shaking her hand, which was widely described as a deliberate snub rather than an honest misunderstanding.
“Instead of stoically bearing it, I whispered to him that we should shake hands again,” she wrote. “As soon as the words left my mouth, I shook my head at myself.”
“How could I forget that Trump knew precisely what he was doing … He wanted to give people something to talk about with his behavior, while I had acted as though I were having a conversation with someone completely normal.”
Merkel’s decision to give her interview to Der Spiegel is itself revealing. Last month, the newspaper described Elon Musk as “enemy number two,” rhetoric that has since forced him to upgrade his personal security.
Merkel’s memoir, entitled Freedom: Memories 1954-2021, will be released for publication next week. In December, she will promote the book at an event with Barack Obama.
Bombshell Report: Oversight Subcommittee Finds Pentagon Deliberately Delayed National Guard Deployment on January 6 — Cover-Up by DoD Inspector General Exposed
November 22, 2024
Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
In a fiery letter to the Department of Defense Inspector General, Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), Chairman of the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, exposed the “systemic failure” within the Pentagon on January 6, 2021.
Loudermilk accused the DoD of intentionally delaying the deployment of the D.C. National Guard (DCNG) and of publishing an Inspector General report that “whitewashes” the events to protect top Pentagon officials.
The letter, addressed to Defense Department Inspector General Robert P. Storch, challenges the findings of Report No. 2022-039, which the DoD Inspector General’s office had presented as a comprehensive review of the Department’s role during the Capitol riots.
Loudermilk’s Subcommittee on Oversight, tasked with probing security failures on January 6, asserts that the report contains glaring inaccuracies and conveniently ignores testimony that exposes Pentagon misconduct.
The DoD IG’s report reveals a troubling oversight in assessing the actions of senior DoD officials, including Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy, who failed to relay deployment orders to Major General William Walker, the DC National Guard Commander, on January 6.
Given the D.C. National Guard’s history of success supporting both the Federal Government and the City Government in responding to civil unrest, and the significant role the Guard played in ensuring the safety and security of Members of Congress at the Capitol on January 6, it is essential that Report No. 2022-039 accurately reflect objective facts so that we can identify the serious problems, abuses, and deficiencies to recommend corrective actions consistent with the Inspector General Act of 19782.
Throughout the Subcommittee’s extensive investigation into the failures of January 6, 2021, we have discovered numerous flaws and objective inaccuracies in the report that your office has yet to appropriately address.
After a thorough examination of e-mails and documents, including letters, memorandums, agreements, plans, orders, reports, briefings, statements made in congressional hearings, closeddoor testimony to the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol (“Select Committee”), and closed-door testimony made to the DoD IG, the Subcommittee’s investigation has concluded that the Department of Defense intentionally delayed the deployment of the DCNG to the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Furthermore, the Subcommittee also maintains that the DoD IG knowingly concealed the extent of the delay in constructing a narrative that is favorable to DoD and Pentagon leadership.
…
In March of 2021, D.C. National Guard Major General William Walker testified before Congress that the Guard’s response to the Capitol on January 6 was delayed by senior DoD officials.
In April of 2024, Colonel Earl Matthews, Major General Walker’s legal advisor, Command Sergeant Major Michael Brooks, Major General Walker’s Senior Enlisted Officer, Brigadier General Aarond Dean, Major General Walker’s Adjutant General, and Captain Timothy Nick, Major General Walker’s Aide-De-Camp, testified before Congress that the Secretary of the Army, Ryan McCarthy, was not in communication with the Guard and that their response to the Capitol was “most certainly delayed [by the Army].” These key DCNG personnel were intentionally not included as witnesses by the DoD IG.
The Subcommittee is deeply concerned that the DoD IG’s failure to interview witnesses who testify to an account of events on January 6 which are contradictory to the report’s conclusions, erode any suggestion that this report is correct or unbiased.
…
A report that includes biased and incomplete statements to favor the Department of Defense and U.S. Army while disparaging the D.C. National Guard fails to represent the DoD IG’s philosophy and practice of producing unbiased, objective, impartial, and independent reviews as well as recommendations grounded in evidence and free from external influence.
Therefore, we are left with no choice but to reject Report No. 2022-039 and request that you publish a formal correction on behalf of the 10,432 congressional staff members and 535 Members of Congress who donned gas masks and retreated from their Chambers while the DCNG sat on buses waiting, less than 2 miles from the Capitol at the D.C. Armory, for communication from Secretary Ryan McCarthy.
“My Subcommittee worked with the DoD IG in good faith throughout our investigation to provide multiple opportunities for the DOD IG to produce corroborating materials or evidence to support their conclusions,” said Chairman Loudermilk in a statement.
“Unfortunately, the DoD IG continues to promote an inaccurate narrative that protects senior Pentagon officials and attempts to cast fault on the D.C. National Guard, who were ready and waiting less than 2 miles from the Capitol but unable to respond on January 6 due to lack of communication from the Secretary of the Army,” he added.
He continued, “My Subcommittee released transcripts that show that not only were political concerns of ‘optics’ at play, but that DoD officials continued to delay as the riot at the Capitol worsened. The evidence is conclusive: DoD officials misled Congress into believing that help was ‘on the way’ with full knowledge that it wasn’t.”
The letter also reveals a shocking claim that thousands of National Guard personnel were ready and equipped to respond yet were left waiting for orders due to “unnecessary bureaucracy and mismanagement.”
The Subcommittee is demanding a formal correction to the report and insists the Pentagon disclose all evidence related to January 6. It has also sought guidance from the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency to ensure accurate historical records.
In September, Rep. Barry Loudermilk released crucial transcripts proving that President Donald Trump did indeed request National Guard deployment to ensure a peaceful protest on January 6th, 2021.
These newly surfaced transcripts, which were previously concealed, reveal the truth that many in the mainstream media have ignored.
According to the documents, General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed that President Trump expressed concern about the potential for unrest and proactively ordered the necessary precautions.
On January 3, 2021, just three days before the protest, General Milley recalled the president saying, “Hey, look at this. There’s going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th. Make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it’s a safe event.”
Trump reportedly added, “I don’t care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it’s safe.”
These damning revelations fly in the face of the narrative propagated by the mainstream media and Democrats who have continuously blamed Trump for the chaos that unfolded on January 6th. The president’s clear directive to deploy the National Guard days before the event highlights his intentions to maintain law and order during the protest.
The transcripts also reveal that other Pentagon officials failed to act on Trump’s requests. Chief Steven Sund of the U.S. Capitol Police made an urgent plea for the National Guard on January 6th.
However, according to Sund, the Secretary of the Army’s representative denied the request, citing concerns about the “optics” of having National Guard troops stationed at the Capitol. This hesitation contributed to the delayed response, exacerbating the situation.
Further complicating matters, Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller acknowledged that Trump had commented on the need for 10,000 troops to ensure security. However, Miller dismissed the president’s request as mere “banter.”
Bombshell Study Censored by The Lancet Finally Released: Confirms ‘High Likelihood of Causal Link Between COVID-19 Vaccines and Death’
November 22, 2024
As previously reported by The Gateway Pundit, a COVID-19 vaccination study is back in the news.
This study was publicly available, but publications such as The Lancet made repeated attempts to censor it. After far too long, it has finally been published.
Coincidentally, as the Trump administration and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. work on a transition plan, these types of stories have entered back into the zeitgeist.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a well-known COVID-19 vaccine combatant, has been active on X recently, speaking of the dangers of the vaccine and advocating for its removal.
Last week, The Gateway Pundit reported on another study -by two of the same authors – citing evidence that the current bird flu strain was leaked from laboratories performing gain of function research.
While there has long been evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine has been harmful because of the spike protein, this study made even broader claims.
“The findings of these researchers present an illustrative case of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s thesis that mass vaccination with nonsterilizing vaccines can result in the emergence of a new, more virulent viral strain.”
As the incoming Trump Administration looms over the swamp of Washington, the timing of such studies appears ominous for an unaccountable health bureaucracy.
The mounting evidence show a poorly constructed vaccine strategy for combating the pandemic. With this study having been previously censored by medical journals such as The Lancet, it begs the question as to why it has suddenly been accepted.
As one of the authors of the study, Nicolas Hulscher, observes, the CDC has remained silent.
The study’s findings are remarkable. The researchers studied autopsies from “…all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination through May 18th, 2023.”
Out of 240 deaths 73.9% can be attributed to the Covid-19 vaccination. The study breaks down the different adverse effects on the immune system and demonstrates why the “Spike Protein” can create unintended consequences as a mechanism for ‘immunological response.’
Curiously, the story of the deaths and the adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccine have stayed out of the mainstream pharmaceutical company-funded outlets.
As of today, according to VAERS, deaths and adverse events related to the Covid-19 Vaccine are sky high. These numbers far exceed not only the vaccines on the current schedule but all other vaccines combined in the history of the system.
Source: VAERS
It should be noted that these events can be reported by anyone and that VAERS should be a signal for safety. It does not, in any way, infer causation.
However, as more studies show threats to safety from the COVID-19 vaccine, the VAERS data can be a point of reference for future analysis.
The vaccines included in the study appear to cover the major platforms available in the marketplace. According to the study, Pfizer-BioNTech, Astrazeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Sinovac-CoronaVac, and Novavax are part of the analysis. This may or may not be relevant.
However, if further investigation continues to uncover similar problems with the vaccine across all platforms, the technology itself may begin to fall under further scrutiny.
As many previous analyses have indicated, the cardiovascular system has been found to be disproportionately affected by the vaccine. This analysis also indicates similar findings.
These studies are possible safety signals that should be flagged. At the very least, further analysis is needed.
See the graph of cases affected by organ system below:
Another observation regarded the three physicians who adjudicated the study. Out of the 240 deaths it was determined that 73.9% were caused by the vaccine.
The study also notes, “Among adjudicators, there was complete independent agreement (all three physicians) of COVID-19 vaccination contributing to death in 203 cases (62.5%).”
In the context of numbers, this should be recognized as Americans were bombarded with statistics during the pandemic.
Many of those statistics have since been proven to be inaccurate as counting in real-time can be difficult. However, for three physicians independently assert that 203 cases were directly caused by the vaccine, our government should be paying attention. These are real world medical practitioners observing patient events.
In summary, the study shows the following:
“…325 autopsy cases and 1 organ-restricted autopsy case (heart). The mean age of death was 70.4 years and there were 139 females (42.6%). Most received a Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine (41%), followed by Sinovac (37%), AstraZeneca (13%), Moderna (7%), Johnson & Johnson (1%), and Sinopharm (1%).”
Lastly, it’s important to point out a phrase oft excluded from mainstream attacks on studies such as this.
One key sentence in the conclusion of this study is the following: “Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.”
The frustration of whistleblowers such as Dr. Peter McCullough likely stem from the lack of inquiry by the regulatory bodies. Perhaps a new administration will be more likely to investigate such alarming signals further.
Senate Democrats Cave In and Allow President Trump to Fill FOUR Crucial Federal Judge Vacancies After Late-Night Deal
November 22, 2024
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Minority Leader John Thune
Senate Republicans struck a late-night deal on Wednesday with Democrats that will allow President Trump to fill four critical federal judge vacancies.
The agreement brokered under the leadership of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) comes as Democrats try to stack the courts with Marxist judges before Republicans take control of all three branches of government in January.
The 119th U.S. Congress will convene on January 3, 2025, ushering in a Republican majority after President Trump’s decisive landslide victory. Trump has already signaled his intent to reshape the federal judiciary, calling for an end to the confirmation of Biden’s “radical left” judges.
Earlier this week, Schumer bragged about fast-tracking Biden’s judicial nominees, declaring that steps had been taken to confirm up to 12 district court judges since last week alone.
“The Senate will keep working to confirm Joe Biden’s excellent nominees,” Schumer wrote.
“I’ve taken the next steps to move forward on another 9 nominees to serve as district court judges,” Schumer boasted on Tuesday.
“That means we’ll have taken steps to move forward on 12 district court judges since the end of last week. We’ll continue to move forward on confirming Biden’s judicial nominees,” Schumer added.
On Wednesday, President Trump issued a pointed warning to GOP senators who fail to show up for critical votes.
“The Democrats are trying to stack the Courts with Radical Left Judges on their way out the door. Republican Senators need to Show Up and Hold the Line — No more Judges confirmed before Inauguration Day!”
The Democrats are trying to stack the Courts with Radical Left Judges on their way out the door. Republican Senators need to Show Up and Hold the Line — No more Judges confirmed before Inauguration Day!
Yet, in a dramatic shift, Senate Democrats abandoned their push to confirm four contentious appellate court nominees and agreed to allow Trump to appoint judges to four key vacancies instead.
According to reports from far-left CNN, Senate leaders struck a deal late Wednesday to ‘expedite’ several of President Biden’s district court nominees in exchange for shelving efforts to confirm four appellate court nominees.
“The trade was four circuit nominees — all lacking the votes to get confirmed — for more than triple the number of additional judges moving forward,” a Schumer spokesperson said.
Under the agreement, Democrats will no longer pursue confirmation of the four Biden appellate nominees but will fast-track votes on seven district court nominees after Thanksgiving.
But conservatives are questioning the motives behind the deal. Was it sheer desperation to salvage some of Biden’s judicial legacy, or did Schumer extract a hidden concession from Republicans?
The deal was struck the night before Matt Gaetz withdrew his nomination for Attorney General. However, FOX News reported that Gaetz “made the decision to withdraw his name on his own.”
WATCH:
A member of the Trump transition team tells me that Matt Gaetz made the decision to withdraw his name on his own.
Gaetz said the controversy surrounding his path to nomination was becoming too much of a distraction. pic.twitter.com/gIgVunx8ZA
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
