White House Press Release: ‘President Trump Celebrates U.S. Army’s 250th Birthday with Iconic Grand Parade’

White House Press Release: ‘President Trump Celebrates U.S. Army’s 250th Birthday with Iconic Grand Parade’

White House Press Release: ‘President Trump Celebrates U.S. Army’s 250th Birthday with Iconic Grand Parade’
June 16, 2025

President Trump greets United States Army troops and the American people (Courtesy: The White House)

On Sunday, June 15, The White House Office of Communications issued a statement: “President Trump Celebrates U.S. Army’s 250th Birthday with Iconic Grand Parade.”

The White House official statement read:

Last night, President Donald J. Trump and the First Lady — along with members of his Administration and military leaders — joined veterans, active-duty troops, wounded warriors, Gold Star Families, and patriotic Americans from all over the country in the nation’s capital to celebrate the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army.

An iconic grand parade wrapped up a day of festivities celebrating the legacy of the U.S. Army and the generations of heroes who have protected our country with strength, selflessness, and bravery — and looking boldly forward to the next 250 years of patriotism and military achievement.

As President Trump said in his remarks: “Tonight, we affirm with unwavering certainty that in the years ahead, and in every generation hence, whenever duty calls and whatever danger comes, the American Soldier will be there. No matter the risks, no matter the obstacles, our warriors will charge into battle, they will plunge into the crucible of fire, and they will seize the crown of victory because the United States of America will always have the grace of Almighty God and the iron will of the United States Army.”

Courtesy: The White House

The White House official statement effectively captured the majesty of the US Army celebrating its milestone 250th birthday in unison with the American people, and its elected government, safeguarded at all times by the US Armed Forces.

Tragically, however, leftist Mainstream Media fear-mongers, hacks, and rabid protestors distorted the US Army’s 250th birthday celebration into a supposed dystopian nightmare, culminating in President Trump’s anointment as King.

In reality, the “Army’s 250th Birthday Celebration,” as it was officially named, commemorated the foundation of General George Washington’s Continental Army, liberating the American people from British monarchical rule, before establishing our revolutionary, new government, of the people, by the people, and for the people.

By sheer coincidence, President Trump, a former standout cadet at the New York Military Academy, and the founding leader of America’s first bona fide populist movement in federal power since the 19th Century, celebrates his birthday on the same day as the US Army: June 14.

Aside from several sincere birthday wishes extended to President Trump by US government dignitaries and US Army personnel, the Commander-in-chief’s own birthday celebration served as a secondary focus, compared to the US Army’s birthday celebration.

Evidently, and strikingly, certain opponents of our shared American ideals and values will never be willing to hail the US Army for protecting and defending civilians during every waking moment, across generations.

On the contrary, The Gateway Pundit held the fortune to gain exclusive media access to the US Army’s 250th birthday celebration in Washington, DC, on June 14.

Later today, The Gateway Pundit will publish exclusive footage from the US Army parade capturing the US Army’s 250th birthday celebration.

The post White House Press Release: ‘President Trump Celebrates U.S. Army’s 250th Birthday with Iconic Grand Parade’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: James Rose

6 Reasons the ‘No Kings’ Riots Are Far Worse Than January 6 — But the Media Still Calls Them ‘Mostly Peaceful’

6 Reasons the ‘No Kings’ Riots Are Far Worse Than January 6 — But the Media Still Calls Them ‘Mostly Peaceful’

6 Reasons the ‘No Kings’ Riots Are Far Worse Than January 6 — But the Media Still Calls Them ‘Mostly Peaceful’
June 16, 2025

Late last week, we came across a commentary video by the gamer Asmongold on YouTube. The topic of course was the unrest surrounding the LA ICE raids. The commentary triggered some back-and-forth with users in his chat one of whom tried to dismiss what was going on in LA by comparing it to the protest on January 6, 2021. This prompted another user to comment that the Left “Always brings up Jan 6.”

To which, Asmongold responded, “Because they don’t have any other examples.”

From the very start of the January 6 saga, it’s been a constant struggle to get the truth out over the mountain of lies spread by the media and the Biden administration about what actually happened that day. The frustration is compounded by the fact that even among those on the Right who are distrustful of the media, many continue to believe the lies. As a result, demonstrable untruths about the protests on January 6 remain unchallenged.

I wish I could challenge all of them here and now, but that’s an exercise that must unfold over time because the lies are so many and the propagandized are so recalcitrant.

As a start, highlighting key differences between what’s been going on (for days now) in Los Angeles and what happened that day in DC over four years ago illustrates just how malevolently deceitful the stories about January 6 are.

From the perspective of someone who was actually present at the Capitol on January 6th and who suffered under the Biden regime’s boot heel–culminating in 18 months of incarceration–the differences in the media’s reaction to J6 and the LA riots is infuriating.

The images of unrest in Los Angeles playing out as the media tells us that it is completely peaceful behavior to attack officers, burn cars, and be kitted out with glossy signage and tactical gear alone are easily mocked. Attempts to compare the two are laughably nonsensical.

It’s not even close as even a cursory examination of the evidence proves.

Let’s take a look at the key differences.

1. Flags

It’s been the topic of many commentators on social media that there’s something extremely off-putting about the fact that the protesters in LA aren’t waving American flags but flags of Mexico, Palestine, and other countries. Though it may seem trivial to some, the flags tell you everything you need to know about what the protesters in both situations hold as guiding ideals.

For January 6, the flags were a mix of American flags along with Trump flags. This underscores the fact that the intent of the protesters was to protest in the name of our own country.

Yes, the protest was directed at elements of the government, but that’s what every protest is ostensibly — a chance to bring and express your grievances to the government in order that those grievances may be addressed.

The LA protesters, on other hand, are clearly not interested in promoting American values or calling on their fellow citizens to uphold American ideals.

No, these are self-identified foreigners resisting a government to which they hold no allegiance in a country whose culture for all intents and purposes they hold in open disdain. All while flying the flags of the nations they so desperately seek to avoid.

On January 6, the media claimed it was the end of democracy because Americans waving American flags were protesting, while this week we have seen them glorify self-identified illegal immigrants saying the laws of America do not apply to them because they are stealing back what amounts to stolen goods, namely the land we call home.

As the protestors in Dallas proclaimed, “Chinga la migra” (F-ck the immigration authorities) and “No one is illegal on stolen land.”

2. Funding

When I booked my flight and hotel to Washington DC, exactly zero tax payer dollars were spent. Neither the Trump speech at the Ellipse nor the protest at the Capitol building saw any protesters provided with food or protest supplies like signs, protective gear, or flags.

Many people have been shocked to discover that the LA rioters are actually being funded, much of it by we the American taxpayers.

Among the non-governmental organizations connected with the street actions over the past weekend are CHIRLA (Coalition of Humane Immigration Rights – LA), PSL (Party for Socialism and Liberation — a Communist organization), and the Million Voters Project.

These organizations share resources and collaborate in numerous ways. The first has received upwards to $34 million in government grants while the other two have benefited from millions of dollars in funding from pro-China Communism billionaire Neville Singham.

And, as we’ll see below, America isn’t the only country providing financial or moral support to the rioters.

None of the protesters on January 6 benefited from this kind of government support. Nor were we flush with millions of dollars paid by billionaires and think tanks.

Because there were over 1,500 of us, the legal fees alone would have easily exceeded $100 million–an amount that already dwarfs the government money received by CHIRLA.

Any donations we received were from individual supporters, many of them anonymously contributing small sums ranging from a few dollars to maybe a couple hundred.

Additionally, these donations were sent to political prisoners’ commissary accounts after they were imprisoned, not before the protest. J6ers were already behind bars when they received any money.

If this iteration of the Summer of Love is anything like the prior 2020 debacle, we can expect most of the LA rioters to have their charges dropped, if any are brought at all.

3. Media Lies

It’s no mystery that the media played a major role in sensationalizing what happened on January 6th. By the end of the day pundits were seething over the “attempted insurrection” and took their fainting couches wailing that America would never recover unless we protesters were all rounded up and taken out of society and away from public discourse.

To enflame public outrage, there was no end to the lies told about January 6. First they said we murdered cops.

When it turned out that the sole deceased officer, Brian Sicknick, died of a heart attack not on January 6th but the next day, they still insisted against all logic and facts the cause of death was the protest.

Then came a slough of officer suicides/dubious deaths, some as late as six months after the original protest. The press claimed these men too were “killed” by J6ers.

As the push back against the counterfactual media claims became more vociferous, the press stopped calling us murderers and instead referred to January 6 as “the deadly protest.”

Why would they use such vague language? Because it was deadly. For us. Four protesters died as a result of police actions that day.

Not a single cop was killed. But to hear the media talk about it, we left the Capitol strewn with the bodies of officers all of whom died valiantly protecting “democracy” from the deadly scourge of popular dissent.

The insistence on characterizing Jan 6 as a “deadly protest” took a very real toll on J6ers.

Imagine being called a murderous insurrectionist by your family members because the government charged you with trespassing.

This was only a small portion of the media mischaracterization of January 6. In every detail, rhetorical language was amped up to provoke the maximum amount of disgust.

One photo of a Democrat picking up a small collection of items from the floor is described by the AP as “Rep. Andy Kim, D-N.J., cleans up debris and personal belongings strewn across the floor of the Rotunda in the early morning hours of Jan. 7, 2021, after rioters stormed the Capitol in Washington.” Yet the floors and walls in the background are pristine and unblemished. Where is the “debris” mentioned?

In another photo, Kim can be seen picking up discarded bottles of water. The floors are again immaculate.

I mention this because one of the biggest lies about Jan 6 is that protesters smeared blood and feces throughout the Capitol. In my own research and in my interactions with three separate AIs (all which conducted extremely long searches for such a simple question), no photographic or video evidence exists. This is best evidence of “feces smeared on the walls” I’ve been able to find: the-sun.com/news/2105149/trump-supporters-smeared-poo-capitol-building/

The original caption reads: “Remnants of feces was spotted on the floor as brown ‘foot-prints,’ a source said.” Not only are there no brown footprints, but the part of the floor untouched by chemical irritants appears so clean, it could have been newly mopped.

So the feces fantasy comes entirely word of mouth from anonymous staffers who were likely experiencing mud for the first time in their lives (it was wet outside) or deliberately fabricating this story in order to frame protesters in the worst possible light.

They promoted the narrative that J6ers were an animalistic rabble mindlessly desecrating the hallowed halls of our anointed government overlords.

Either that, or we are to believe that these same staffers, festooned with high tech gadgets all equipped with cameras didn’t once think to document their startling discovery.

The media lies in the other extreme when it comes the actual deadly riots fomented by the Left. As Real Clear politics has documented, damages from the BLM riots ran into the billions of dollars.

Yet the media insisted throughout 2020 that the columns of smoke were the product of “mostly peaceful protests” — a claim so ludicrous that the still image of the CNN reporter standing in front of a burning city block with those words emblazoned on the chyron at the bottom of screen became a symbol of media malfeasance. My based attorney Marina Medvin used that very still in one of my filings.

Today, the media continue to insist that the riots happening over the course of days in LA are also peaceful.

ABC7 Jory Rand argued on Sunday that the National Guard wasn’t needed on the scene because it was “just a bunch of people having fun watching cars burn.” The media insisted the problem wasn’t protesters’ violence, but that the presence of law enforcement provoked them.

Most people aren’t so demeaned that they would listen to such lies, but as I keep pointing out, they know people don’t believe them. They know they won’t change hearts or minds.

When Leftists speak, it’s to encourage their fellow Leftists to violence. And that’s exactly what’s happening in LA and now in other cities around the country as well.

But J6ers weren’t only faced with media lies.

4. Government Response

Before the sun set on January 6 2021, the word was out. The day was repeatedly labeled an attempted insurrection and this media furor gave the government the basis it needed to mobilize its full force in a political round-up campaign of “shock and awe” in response to a growing threat of domestic terror.

Even in its first few months, this nationwide police action was already described as the “largest investigation and prosecution” in the recent history of the Department of Justice.

Today, after a weekend-plus of constant street violence and destruction, the LA PD currently claim roughly 39 arrests with most of those being for failure to disperse while the rest are related to blocking highway 101.

Considering that protests have been out of hand for days on end now, that’s a distressingly low number of arrests for relatively minor crimes.

Compare that with the federal government’s treatment of people who walked harmlessly through our Capitol and the lengths through which the Department of Justice went to charge with insurrectiony-sounding crimes (“interference in official proceeding”) which didn’t even apply to their cases legally.

It doesn’t even come close in either scope or scale. When rounding up the small business owners and farmers of J6, the FBI employed wires, facial recognition software, financial tracking, and cell phone geofencing. For the ICE protests, the FBI is simply putting up old fashioned wanted posters with promises of rewards.

But even on the ground, there was a massive difference in response. The disturbance of January 6 lasted a mere few hours spanning from the time Trump’s speech ended around 1pm and the crowds dispersed in time to get back to their hotels by curfew, which was 6pm that day.

And speaking of curfew, that was the only push warning we protesters received on that day.

Despite the fact that the city (and certainly the federal government) had the ability to push out a notice to disperse, no such order was even given. Not by phone, nor by the Giant Voice System that had been operational in DC since 2015.

By the time the protest was called an illegal gathering, we protesters were already departing the West Terrace in an orderly fashion. I should know. I was the last person off the Western Terrace.

The ICE protesters on other hand, have been given numerous warnings to disperse. Not just one night but over the course of several consecutive days including June 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th.

For many of us at the Capitol on Jan 6th, the situation was chaotic and unfamiliar. Although there were conflicts with the police, the bulk of the protesters would have complied with official directions to disperse had any been given. None were. That’s not the case with the LA protesters. They can’t plead ignorance or confusion because the order to disperse and declaration of illegal gathering occurs every night in a ritualistic fashion.

5. Arson and Looting

There’s a very famous photo that the media likes to pull out to defame J6 protesters. It’s quite dramatic, although the truth behind utterly destroys the story it’s meant to push.

The photo shows a great cloud rising from a glowing light. I think most people looking at this would assume that the Capitol building itself had been set afire. It wasn’t. In fact, no fires whatsoever were set by the protesters.

What appears to be smoke in that photo is actually a massive cloud of chemical irritants such as, but not limited to, tear gas. The reason it looks like there’s a fire is because that cloud appears to be rising from a light source.

But the light source is actually a massive concussive blast from flash bang grenades. The photo either has perfect timing, or it’s a still frame taken from a longer video.

Nonetheless, the light coming from below the cloud is actually a bit of stagecraft to make it look like something is on fire when it isn’t.

So what you’re actually seeing is NOT a group of destructive protesters dancing in the flames they set in the nation’s Capitol. In reality it’s a large group of people kettled in on the West Terrace being mercilessly bombarded with munitions by police. The same police who provided no means of egress, no order to disperse, and no warning.

Compare this to the constant lighting of fires in LA — a practice that, again, has continued for many consecutive days now. In fact, many of the more iconic images from those protests feature the columns of black smoke and flaming cars deliberately torched by the LA rioters. It’s almost as if the Left accuses the Right for the very crimes they commit.

Another thing the J6 protesters refrained from doing that the LA rioters are keen on is looting. No stores in DC were touched, torched, broken into, or robbed that day. Like I said, we were in by 6pm. That didn’t leave a lot of time for mischief. Nevermind that the destruction of private property is not something conservatives condone.

Not the case with the invaders in LA. In fact, the looting situation remains so fluid that no dollar amounts have been calculated for the damage inflicted on local businesses. According to Grok on X, there have been approximately 15 LA businesses attacked thus far. These include an Apple Store, a T-Mobile, several shoe stores (Adidas, Nike, and a Shoe Palace), several jewelry stores, two dispensaries, and a sushi place.

Keep in mind, this is a running tally. Unless these riots are stopped, the looting and arson is likely to continue.

This is devastating for the citizens of Los Angeles. We know this because over four years after the George Floyd riots, Minneapolis has yet to recover. Many of the businesses destroyed never reopened. Property values cratered. Homelessness and crime spiked. And even the schools declined.

Looting does more than illegally transfer the goods held by the store into the hands of the looters. It ruins the social compact between local governments and businesses, causing them to flee areas where civic leaders are too incompetent to ensure a functioning social order.

That’s another way of saying that looting inflicts a permanent malaise in cities where it occurs. Those businesses are not going to come back.

And I can’t help but chuckle to myself at the fact that a box of DC jurors hated us much more than any potential box of LA jurors will hate the separatist rioters who caused substantially more damage to local businesses and personal property. We were hated not for what we did but for who we supported politically.

6. Purpose

The last big difference between the LA rioters and the J6 protesters lies in the reasons behind each protest.

J6ers marched to the People’s House that day to exercise our rights as citizens and protest a stolen election. It’s really telling that you can say this in mixed company these days and people generally at least acknowledge that the 2020 election was suspiciously anomalous to say the least.

There’s a trope on the Left that the courts somehow weighed in on the validity of our concerns and issued definitive judgments based on dispassionate and thorough investigations. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The courts then, like now, operated in defense of the Washington Beast. Instead of judging the cases on their merits, complaints were dismissed on standing — a consideration that has nothing to do with validity of the arguments of those who challenged the case.

In the highly rare and exceptional instances where the arguments were considered, the election skeptics were actually vindicated.

But then came the research by the Caesar Rodney Institute into the enormous web of billionaire-backed organizations dedicated to tipping the election in Biden’s favor. That was followed by the movie 2000 Mules which showed how the steal was pulled off.

But beyond these examples and other research, there was always something extremely off about the Biden administration.

It’s very important to understand that no matter what you think about the Jan 6  protest, Biden was the ultimate winner of that debate when it came to the certification of the election. Biden’s presidency was not derailed.

Though he came into the White House under a cloud of suspicion, a very similar cloud of “Russian collusion” dogged the first Trump administration. Yet the manner in which the two presidents treated their detractors could not be more different.

Trump was continually and publicly harangued, yet he remained magnanimous. He didn’t send police into the countryside to pull apart families for the crime of having a different political opinion.

Biden did. Not only did he constantly hound us and our families and our supporters and anyone who so much as questioned his election online (as well as traditional Catholics and prolifers)—he also labored at various points throughout his administration to stoke extreme hatred and fear against the country for questioning his legitimacy.

Call me crazy, but that seems like a major indictment of the 2020 election. From the start, Biden acted like a man desperate to keep the truth from coming to light and willing to use any government tool to suppress that truth.

Revelations since Biden departed from ofice have only underscored the degree to which his entire presidency seemed a carefully orchestrated and deliberately staged deception. The advent of the autopen scandal has for the first time in the history of American politics left the voting public perplexed as to who was actually running the country for those four dark years.

Contrast this with the LA rioters. Waving flags of the very countries they allegedly fled from, they fight for a right no true American citizen can claim: immunity from federal law.

This despite the fact the reason they’re protesting is because they aren’t even citizens to begin with and the specific law they demand immunity from happen to be the very laws we the people established to control who does and does not become an American.

This is no petition of grievances. They’re protesting for a permanent change in how immigration law is applied. If granted, this proposition nullifies laws essential for how we American citizens control our land, our culture, and our government. If we choose to listen to the rioters’ pleas for sympathy, it would lead to the total annihilation of the American nation state as we know it.

Which, frankly, is their explicit aim. It’s no secret. The protesters are openly saying this is their goal: to wrench our country away from us. The invaders frequently refer to our country as “stolen land” which must be subject to “reconquista” or reconquest. One of the groups supporting the rioters is the Communist organization Centro CSO, which claims the entire American Southwest is actually a separate Chicano nation, called Aztlan.

So if you were wondering why the protesters are waving flags of countries they never want to return to, there’s your most logical answer: they aren’t going back to Mexico because they’re bringing Mexico to us.

It seems we have a name for when you go to a country to establish a territory for your home country: invasion.

As if that’s not damning enough, none other than the president of Mexico, upon discovering the existence of a remittance tax in the upcoming budget bill, warned America that she would “mobilize” against our country in response. Within two weeks LA protesters were pushing to create an autonomous zone where American federal immigration law would not apply. This is naked aggression.

There’s a real poetic justice in the fact that media talking heads like to compare Jan 6 with what’s going on with the ICE riots. As I’ve pointed out, they seemed to have a vested interest in protecting the DC system by convincing our fellow citizens that Jan 6 was an insurrection.

Yet the most unbiased assessment of the facts around the ICE riots, which they relentlessly downplay, reveal that the rioters’ focus and goal are nothing short of insurrection itself.

And this major difference is the most important distinguishing characteristic between the two events: that Jan 6ers were intent on saving our great nation through lawful political dissent, while the ICE rioters want nothing more than to tear the country apart as their continued lawlessness mindlessly refashions LA in the image of the nations they fled.


Matt da Silva once worked at the highest levels of government trust as a Japanese and Mandarin Navy linguist. In addition to working at the tip of the intel spear, he also has the distinction of having served 18 months in federal prison for his involvement in Jan 6. Now he’s pardoned and using his intel analysis and writing skills in defense of the 21st century civil rights movement known as the MAGA movement. You can find more of his writings at his substack (which is free). You may also want to give him a follow on X and TruthSocial or watch his videos on his Rumble channel, J6 Matt Cast. Please subscribe!

Wanna put a tip in the jar? https://buymeacoffee.com/j6matt_cast

The post 6 Reasons the ‘No Kings’ Riots Are Far Worse Than January 6 — But the Media Still Calls Them ‘Mostly Peaceful’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Guest Contributor

LA Riots Hand Republicans Script for Midterms

LA Riots Hand Republicans Script for Midterms

LA Riots Hand Republicans Script for Midterms
June 16, 2025

This story originally was published by Real Clear Wire

By Philip Wegmann , Susan Crabtree

The masked man on the motorcycle, the one who waved a Mexican flag in front of a torched car as Los Angeles police stood by, will soon be famous. His identity remains unknown, his image iconic – but for all the wrong reasons.

Republicans will replay the clip again and again in campaign ads ahead of the midterms.

“This lawlessness is exactly what Americans rejected in 2024,” said Michael Whatley, chairman of the Republican National Committee. “While Democrats sow chaos, Republicans stand as the party of law and order.” President Trump is delivering on his campaign promise to crack down on illegal immigration, Whatley told RealClearPolitics, and ahead of the midterms, his party “will continue to run on this winning message and finish the job for the American people.”

As National Guard were being deployed to quell violence in California, Republicans were mobilizing to capture and catalog video of looting, rioting, and violence. One RNC official told RCP they were struggling to capture the flood of content coming across cable news.

“It was just non-stop,” they said. “There was so much.”

That content from the LA riots will soon provide fodder for the contrast Republicans hope to paint in November of next year, illustrating the failed immigration policies they allege California Gov. Gavin Newsom now embodies. For his part, Newsom blames Trump for inflaming an already “combustible situation.”

Los Angeles became ground zero for the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown Saturday when ICE agents launched a series of raids across the city. Protests followed. Some of the demonstrations have been peaceful. The ones getting wall-to-wall news coverage, however, were not. Demonstrators hurled rocks, firework shells, and Molotov cocktails at police. Vandalism and looting ensued, prompting Trump to order 2,000 National Guardsmen to the city without the approval of the California governor.

Newsom quickly condemned the move as a “blatant abuse of power” that puts the nation on a path to authoritarianism. “Trump is pulling a military dragnet all across Los Angeles,” Newsom said in a speech delivered from an LA studio Tuesday, as the city remains under a curfew ordered by Mayor Karen Bass. “Well beyond his stated intent to just go after violent and serious criminals, his agents are arresting dishwashers, gardeners, day laborers and seamstresses.”

“California may be first, but it clearly won’t end here,” the governor said. “Other states are next. Democracy is next.”

The White House already saw the riots as an opportunity to paint Democrats as hapless in the face of lawlessness. After the governor’s speech, they were overjoyed to have that fight with Newsom. “Democrats are not even choosing the 20 on 80-20 issues,” a White House official told RCP. “They’re choosing the 10 on 90-10 issues.”

The situation in Los Angeles could be perilous for Democrats. Newsom has tried to differentiate a violent mob from lawful demonstrators, warning on social media that those “who take advantage of Trump’s chaos” will be held accountable, while encouraging those who are “protesting peacefully.”

The White House, meanwhile, sees nothing but anarchy and is considering invoking the Insurrection Act, a law that grants the president authority to deploy the military on U.S. soil. Asked if he was considering it, Trump told RCP Tuesday in the Oval Office, “We will see.”

Republicans are betting that voters have already made up their minds. “AI couldn’t generate better imagery,” said Jesse Hunt, a GOP strategist and former communications director at the National Republican Senatorial Campaign. Trump won the general election, in large part, in reaction to the lax immigration policies of the Biden administration, Hunt told RCP, and the mob violence in LA will capture voter attention ahead of the midterms.

“It paints a real picture of which side voters can choose to be on,” he said, “public servants enforcing U.S. law in an American city or a violent mob waving another country’s flag.”

The National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee has already cut a digital spotthat will serve as a template for the midterms. Posted on social media Tuesday, the video splices together clips of rock-hurling rioters in the smoke-filled streets of LA with soundbites from Democrats defending the demonstrations as “mostly peaceful protests.”

The Congressional Leadership Fund, the super PAC aligned with Speaker Mike Johnson and the largest spender in House campaigns, has already argued this week that the riots roiling Los Angeles will continue to spread to other cities. When confronted with that chaos, the group predicted, “Americans will vote accordingly.”

A new survey commissioned by CLF, obtained by RCP, and conducted by Trump pollster Tony Fabrizio, provides the reasoning for their confidence. The polling of key congressional districts found that on illegal immigration and deportations, 57% favor “hiring nearly 40,000 additional ICE and border patrol agents to address illegal immigration as well as drug and human trafficking.” The Republican survey also showed 68% of voters favor funding for the military to support law enforcement “in their fight against drug cartels.”

The Trump administration remains convinced that the public is on their side. “They are incredibly out of touch with what the vast majority of Americans support,” a White House official said of Democrats, telling RCP, “We are going on offense and backing them into the corner of supporting dangerous criminal illegal aliens, violent rioters, and lawless chaos.”

This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics’ national political correspondent.

The post LA Riots Hand Republicans Script for Midterms appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Guest Contributor

Mark Levin: “This is MAGA Foreign Policy”

Mark Levin: “This is MAGA Foreign Policy”

Mark Levin: “This is MAGA Foreign Policy”
June 16, 2025

 

Writing on Jewish News Syndicate, Fox News host Mark Levin praised Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu for “transforming the Middle East” leading to a “world free of a nuclear terror regime” and attacked “isolationists” in the MAGA movement who are “turning on our president.” Levin is said to have been key in Trump’s decision to support Netanyahu’s decision to strike the Islamic Regime terrorizing Tehran.

The Gateway Pundit reprints the entire commentary here and welcomes your comments – but keep it civil, people!

Mark Levin: So tired of the isolationists barking about the old and failed foreign policy of the past and insisting that they’ve uncovered the secret, new way forward: isolationism.

There’s nothing new or good about isolationism, which, in a word, is appeasement. It’s old and promotes war, such as World War II. Even worse, these knuckleheads can’t even coherently explain what they mean. Have you watched them on TV?

They’re too self-righteous in their ignorance to realize how absurd they sound. They don’t agree among themselves what the hell they’re talking about.

In fact, they’re so blind and self-important that they don’t see the new foreign policy taking place in real time, right in front of their eyes! That’s the mindset of ideological fanatics.

We are witnesses to a foreign policy unlike any since Reagan-Thatcher-John Paul II defeated the Soviet Union. It’s nothing like the recent failed policies we’ve seen in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere.

U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are together demonstrating how to deal with a genocidal terrorist regime, how to use diplomacy and military power, how to use Intel and special forces, how to use the media and public statements and more, to defeat the biggest terror-supporting regime on the planet.

It is and has been brilliant, and if all goes well, it will result in a transformed Middle East, an expansion of the Abraham Accords, and a world free of a nuclear terror regime. They are achieving what 47 years of prior policies have not. This is a very big deal!  This is a real peace plan.

Yet the isolationists, such as “Chatsworth Qatarlson” (Tucker Carlson), are now turning on our president, as they’ve spent months demeaning Netanyahu. They prefer the likes of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who apparently is more MAGA (Make America Great Again) than Trump.

They wind up turning themselves into pretzels, actually characterizing the Iranian regime as oppressed and victimized. These reprobates have never been MAGA.

They have sought to hijack a movement they never created, claim to be its leaders and influencers and redefine it to accommodate their own perverse ideological views, to the extent they can rationally explain them. They have clung to a movement they do not support. Hence, their hesitation in supporting our ally Israel, or outright opposition to it, in its righteous war of survival against the Iranian terrorist regime, which benefits the entire West.

It is a regime that has killed and maimed Americans, sought to assassinate the American president, threatens Israel with nuclear annihilation, seeks to slaughter millions of Israelis, has spread death and mayhem in Lebanon, Yemen, Gaza and Iraq, and has aligned itself with Communist China, North Korea and Russia.

The isolationists tell us that to oppose this is to be a warmonger and anti-MAGA. Just close your eyes and cover your ears. They also don’t seem to care that they attract Marxists, Islamists and antisemites.

Some even openly promote and celebrate them. That’s not MAGA either. President Trump is a proud American patriot. He despises bigots. And he has done more than any president ever to fight antisemitism and anti-Americanism in our country. No, they’re not MAGA. But we’ve seen their likes before.

Mark Levin is the host of “Life, Liberty and Levin” on Fox News  and “The Mark Levin Show” on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18Stqkdcr5k

The post Mark Levin: “This is MAGA Foreign Policy” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Collin McMahon

Gen. Mike Flynn: President Trump’s Defining Middle East Legacy

Gen. Mike Flynn: President Trump’s Defining Middle East Legacy

Gen. Mike Flynn: President Trump’s Defining Middle East Legacy
June 16, 2025

Israel’s all-out attack on the nuclear weapons infrastructure and leadership of Iran has created an historic choice: Will Israel be allowed to defeat decisively the existential threat long posed by the tyrannical Iranian regime both to her people and ours and, thereby, usher in an era of potential strategic stability aligned with Western civilization that the Middle East and the free world have rarely known?

Or will the United States interfere, as it has done consistently in the past, to prevent such a clear-cut victory and, thereby, ensure that Israel’s enemies, and ours, live to fight another day?

The answer is essentially up to President Donald Trump. And how he comes down may depend on whether he is being properly informed of the options and opportunities versus their associated risks.

Or is he being disserved by those who profess to speak for the America First movement, but actually seem to be putting Iran First and Qatar First.

Fortunately, Mr. Trump appears to have, as usual, grasped the central issue: In comments on June 14th responding to Tucker Carlson’s criticism of “U.S. support for Israel during its attacks on Iran as…anathema to the ‘America First’ way of doing things,” the President told The Atlantic’s Michael Scherer:

“Well, considering that I’m the one that developed “America First,” and considering that the term wasn’t used until I came along, I think I’m the one that decides that. For those people who say they want peace you can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon.

So, for all of those wonderful people who don’t want to do anything about Iran having a nuclear weapon – that’s not peace.”

Presumably, that clarity will translate into further support for Israel’s comprehensive take- down of the Iranian nuclear weapons program and its destruction of Iran’s capacity to fight on thanks to surviving second- and third-tier regime leadership many of whom are reputed to be even more psychopathic and apocalyptic than those more senior clerics and oficers thankfully neutralized to date.

Whether that is so may turn on the quality of the advice President Trump is receiving. In addition to non-oficial influencers like the increasingly critical Tucker Carlson, he may be getting bad advice from an Obama-Biden holdover-dominated intelligence community that wrongly contends Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program; Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East Michael DiMino; and others who portray themselves as “nationalists,” “realists” and champions of “restraint.”

In fact, they are advocating a formula for a truly “endless war” in the Mideast.

Stopping Israel from finishing the job whether by cutting of the supply of weapons it requires to prosecute the war or by otherwise interfering with its pursuit will mean that some residual nuclear program remains in the hands of Sharia-supremacists who remain and are determined to destroy both Israel and the United States.

The U.S. military will inevitably be required to contend with the calamity that will follow.

In other words, instead of an exemplary application of the Trump Doctrine whereby our allies are strong and able decisively to defend their interests and ours in their dangerous neighborhoods with U.S. support (e.g., defensive support, intelligence, access to munitions and political cover) but not direct, ofensive engagement we would have a true and costly quagmire.

This is a time when President Trump must have access to his best military advice from Joint Chiefs Chairman General Daniel “Raisin” Caine and Central Command’s General Michael “Erik” Kurilla about both the opportunities, as well as the risks, associated with Israel having the time, wherewithal and diplomatic leeway to pursue successfully a decisive victory.

Not least, the President is entitled to hear that the utter destruction of the Chinese Communists’ most important regional ally by ours is arguably the single most important step we can take at the moment to deter their aggression elsewhere.

It may even translate into a decision on the part of members of the BRICS especially Saudi Arabia that it is not in their interest to advance the group’s agenda of taking down the dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

All we are saying is give peace a real chance by making Donald Trump’s legacy in the Middle East the only one worthy of the name: ensuring that Israel and America are decisively victorious over the Sharia-supremacist regime that has for far too long enslaved the Iranian people and threatened and actually killed ours and those of the Jewish state.

Frank J. Gafney acted as Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan. He is currently the President of the Institute for the American Future (USFuture.org).

LTG (RET) Michael T. Flynn, former National Security Advisor to the 45th POTUS, a two-time best-selling author and holder of three master’s degrees. He is considered a subject matter expert on Diplomacy, Statecraft, Foreign Policy, Strategy Formulation, Defense, Intelligence, and other areas of national and international security. He served more than 33 years in the U.S. military with multiple overseas combat tours. Flynn can be found at GeneralFlynn.com.

The post Gen. Mike Flynn: President Trump’s Defining Middle East Legacy appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Guest Contributor