Elon Musk, a key advisor to Donald Trump, has once again spotlighted the openly racist and genocidal rhetoric of some of South Africa’s most influential politicians, along with the government’s blatantly discriminatory policies against white Afrikaners.

In a post to his social media platform X, Musk—responding to a video where Julius Malema, the leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters’s party, is chanting “Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer” in front of a massive crowd—wrote: “Very few people know that there is a major political party in South Africa that is actively promoting white genocide.”

“Kill the Boer/White farmer” earlier Today. So much for Human Rights Day.. https://t.co/BBhKbiwJ9U

— Boer (@twatterbaas) March 21, 2025

Musk, in his post, then criticized the lack of media coverage of virulently anti-white rhetoric in South Africa, highlighting a recent arena chant calling for violence against white people. He also condemned a new law allowing the expropriation of “property from white people” without compensation.

“A whole arena chanting about killing white people,” Musk wrote. “Where is the outrage? Why is there no coverage by the legacy media?”

He then criticized a South African law that prevents his Starlink satellite internet service from operating in the country, alleging it is due to his race, as he is “not Black.”

President Trump has previously condemned the race-based land expropriation law as an “egregious action” that unjustly targets white South Africans. In response, he ordered cuts to U.S. aid to Pretoria to pressure the government to abandon the policy.

Pretoria absurdly claims that its land expropriation without compensation policy is intended to address historical injustices and is not racially discriminatory.

Musk followed up with another post on Monday, where he argued: “The legacy media never mentions white genocide in South Africa, because it doesn’t fit their narrative that whites can be victims.”

The legacy media never mentions white genocide in South Africa, because it doesn’t fit their narrative that whites can be victims https://t.co/K7FS3EtVYR

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 24, 2025

This isn’t the first time Musk has highlighted the deeply troubling situation in South Africa. In February 2024, he drew attention to the issue in a Twitter post featuring Julius Malema refusing to say that he would not call for the slaughter of white South Africans.

“The likely future leader of South Africa calls for genocide of the 4 million whites who live there,” Musk wrote.

The likely future leader of South Africa calls for genocide of the 4 million whites who live there https://t.co/MNEzOUaN1L

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 7, 2024

Malema’s vile rhetoric has real-world consequences. In 2022 alone, white South African farmers suffered over 300 attacks, including 50 brutal murders—many marked by extreme brutality.

Right-wing activist Lauren Southern produced a compelling documentary on South Africa’s farm murders a few years ago, which remains well worth watching.

Earlier this month, Tucker Carlson interviewed Afrikaner Dr. Ernst Roets. The two discussed the ongoing farm murders and the future of Afrikaners in South Africa.

The post Musk Exposes South African Political Leader Pushing for Genocide Against White Farmers appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth has obstructed the Trump administration’s efforts to defund Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), a Cold War relic that continues to disseminate globalist narratives under the guise of independent journalism.

This decision undermines the administration’s mandate to eliminate wasteful spending on organizations that no longer serve America’s interests.​

​On March 15, 2025, Kari Lake, serving as Senior Advisor to the Acting CEO of the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), issued a letter terminating the federal grant for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL).

This action followed an executive order by President Donald Trump aimed at reducing the operations of several agencies, including the USAGM, which oversees RFE/RL and other U.S.-funded broadcasters.

The termination attempt led to an immediate funding freeze, with RFE/RL reporting that a $7.5 million invoice submitted on March 17, 2025, went unpaid.

In response, RFE/RL filed a lawsuit against USAGM, Kari Lake, and Acting CEO Victor Morales on Tuesday, arguing that the termination violated federal laws and the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress exclusive authority over federal spending.

U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, issued a temporary restraining order, effectively blocking Kari Lake, now serving as Senior Advisor at USAGM, from proceeding with the administration’s efforts to shut down RFE/RL’s operations.

The judge ordered the agency to halt all termination and closeout activities, allowing the controversial news outlet to keep the lights on with $7.5 million in federal funds.

RFE/RL, originally funded by the CIA and once a vital tool in the Cold War against communist regimes, now broadcasts into 23 countries across Europe, Central Asia, and the Middle East.

But critics argue its modern-day mission has strayed far from championing freedom. Instead, they say, the network pushes narratives aligned with internationalist agendas, undermining nationalist movements and conservative policies in sovereign nations.

Judge Lamberth asserted that the government had failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the funding cut and accusing the agency of acting “arbitrarily and capriciously.”

The ruling prevents the agency from halting operations or initiating any wind-down procedures—effectively overruling the will of the executive branch and Congress’s shift toward restraint abroad.

According to the ruling reviewed by The Gateway Pundit:

Congress has found that “it is the policy of the United States to promote the right of freedom of opinion and expression” and that “open communication of information and ideas among the peoples of the world contributes to international peace and stability.”

RFE/RL has, for decades, operated as one of the organizations that Congress has statutorily designated to carry out this policy. The leadership of USAGM cannot, with one sentence of reasoning offering virtually no explanation, force RFE/RL to shut down—even if the President has told them to do so.

Therefore, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 6] for a Temporary Restraining Order, the defendants’ Opposition thereto, the plaintiff’s Reply, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED.

Read the court ruling below:

The post Federal Judge Forces Kari Lake and Trump Administration to Keep Funding Globalist Propaganda Radio in Europe appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Former Trump co-campaign manager Chris La Civita is suing The Daily Beast for defamation.

In a lawsuit against the left-wing media company, LaCivita accuses the outlet “malicious” and “damag[ing] reporting about him that showed a “with reckless disregard for the truth.”

His case refers to an article written and published by investigative reporter Michael Isikoff alleging that LaCivita made a staggering $22 million off the Trump campaign.

LaCivita maintains these funds were used for to pay for advertising and that he only made a fraction off that in political consultancy fees.

Fuck around and Find Out Trump senior adviser files defamation suit against The Daily Beast https://t.co/j3RcWvO9CC

— Chris LaCivita (@ChrisLaCivita) March 24, 2025

After the story went out, LaCivita’s lawyers sent a letter demanding the retraction of the story, citing publicly available campaign finance reports documenting his personal expenditures.

The Daily Beast amended the article to state that he actually made $19.2 million off the campaign and removed a podcast in which Isikoff discussed his findings.

However, the outlet has kept the story on its website and insisted they stand by their journalist’s reporting.

“Defendant’s false statements created the false impression that Mr. LaCivita was charging exorbitant rates for his services and personally enriching himself at the expense of the campaign, thereby harming his reputation as an honest, reasonable, and ethical political operative,” LaCivita’s lawsuit states.

“As a direct and proximate result of the publication of the defamatory statements, Mr. LaCivita has suffered special damages, including damage to his reputation and loss of business income,” it continues.

The company responded by syaing that it “stands by its reporting on Chris LaCivita.”

“His lawsuit is meritless and a transparent attempt to intimidate the Beast and silence the independent press,” the outlet said in a statement.

“The Beast will defend itself vigorously and looks forward to following the money to confirm where every penny flowed in LaCivita’s LLC.”

LaCivita has not specified what he will be requesting in damages, with this likely to be determined at a later date.

Should he suceed in his lawsuit and receive a substantial amount in damages, it could potentially bankrupt the company altogether.

According to Axios, Trump was initially enraged by the story and demanded an explanation from LaCivita.

When LaCivita broke down the payments, Trump backed down and suggested that he file a lawsuit against the media outlet.

LaCivita will be represented by celebrity lawyer Mark Geragos, who has previously defended the likes of Chris Brown, Winona Ryder, Jussie Smollett and Colin Kaerpernick.

The post Trump Advisor Chris LaCivita Hits Daily Beast With Defamation Lawsuit for Claiming He Pocketed $22 Million From Campaign appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Amid attempts by left-wing globalists—including the Green Party and socialists—to ban the party, alongside relentless smear campaigns from a politicized domestic intelligence agency and its allies in the mainstream press, public support for Alternative for Germany (AfD) continues to grow.

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has reached a record high in public support, climbing to 23.5% in a new INSA poll released on Tuesday, narrowing the gap with the country’s leading ‘conservative’ globalist alliance.

“This is the highest value ever measured for the AfD in the INSA opinion trend,” Hermann Binkert, head of the INSA polling institute, told the German newspaper Bild.

The AfD has gained nearly three percentage points since the election, reducing the gap with the CDU/CSU to just 3.5 points—down from nearly eight points a month ago.

Umfrage-Hammer: AfD erreicht historisches Allzeithoch: 23,5%! Die CDU bricht ein. #AfD #Bundestag pic.twitter.com/YuhYk1zPtG

— Nicole Jordan (@NicoleJordanAfD) March 25, 2025

The Gateway Pundit reported on a separate INSA poll published Sunday revealed “73% of all voters and 44% of CDU/CSU supporters felt deceived” by CDU chief Friedrich Merz’s empty campaign promises to limit migration and deal with Germany’s debt problem.

This surge reflects growing voter frustration with Germany’s legacy globalist parties, fueled by deep, long-standing concerns—ones that have been ignored or ridiculed by the corrupt, self-serving political establishment—over mass migration and the country’s ever-worsening economic situation.

The current situation with Alternative for Germany (AfD) strikingly mirrors the 2024 U.S. presidential election of Donald Trump, where every attempt by the globalist establishment to undermine or eliminate him—both politically and personally—only seemed to strengthen his position and bolster his public support.

Every legacy media outlet in Germany, whether they describe themselves as ‘conservative’ or ‘liberal,’ has spent years relentlessly portraying the AfD as an evil, Nazi-aligned, far-right extremist party—without ever affording the AfD a fair opportunity to respond.

Both corporate and state media in Germany have systematically blocked AfD politicians from appearing and presenting their policy positions to the public.

Similarly, the parties often referred to as the “old parties”—the Christian Democrats, Social Democrats, Greens, Free Democrats, and the Left—have established what they call a “Brandmauer” or “firewall” (known as a cordon sanitaire in French), effectively prohibiting any collaboration with the AfD. This action silences the democratic voice of the millions of AfD supporters.

Germany’s far-left extremist activist Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser, who’s previously written for an Antifa publication— the press organ of the Bund der Antifaschistinnen und Antifaschisten (VVN-BdA), an organization classified as left-wing extremist by the Bavarian state intelligence agency—banned the right-wing publication Compact.

Faeser directed the police to raid apartments in four German regions linked to the company, its management, and shareholders. Shortly after, Germany’s top court deemed Faeser’s actions illegal, allowing Compact to resume publication.

But that’s not all. The AfD is also facing unfair attacks from another front. Germany’s domestic security services, which have clear political allegiances to the various “old parties”—including the Christian Democrats and Social Democrats—are working to suppress support for the AfD by labeling its state organizations—and soon the party as a whole—as “right-wing extremist” and a “threat to the constitutional order.”

The intelligence chief for the state of Thuringia previously compared AfD voters to Hitler supporters, calling them “brown filth.”

“We’re at about 20 percent brown filth in the Federal Republic,” Kramer told broadcaster NDR Info after Alternative for Germany’s landmark election victory in the Sonnenberg district, which followed the AfD reaching a polling high of 20 percent nationwide—meaning one in five Germans supported the party.

The “brown” reference is clearly an allusion to the Nazi brownshirts, with many on the left and within the establishment media consistently trying to label the AfD as National Socialists.

Germany: Anti-Democratic Globalist Extremist Green Party Pushes for AfD Ban, ‘Conservative’ CDU May Be On Board

The post Support for Alternative for Germany (AfD) Climbs to All-Time High Amid Globalist Push to Ban the Party appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Rep. Randy Weber (R-Texas) is set to introduce a censure resolution against Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) for her shameless, low-blow comments mocking Gov. Greg Abbott’s disability.

Weber, a fellow Texan who clearly understands the meaning of honor, told Fox News that Crockett’s vile rhetoric has no place in Congress—or anywhere else in the Lone Star State, for that matter.

“The story of our great governor of Texas is one of unwavering resilience and perseverance,” Weber said.

“Meanwhile, the actions of Jasmine Crockett—stooping to vile levels of discrimination and despicable political attacks—are nothing short of reprehensible.”

Abbott, paralyzed at 26 after a freak accident when an oak tree fell on him during a jog, has overcome adversity to lead Texas with strength and conviction. Crockett, on the other hand, seems to think cheap shots and crass insults are a substitute for substantive debate.

Crockett’s disgusting remarks came during a weekend event hosted by the Human Rights Campaign in Los Angeles on Sunday night.

“Y’all know we got Governor Hot Wheels down there—come on now! And the only thing hot about him is that he is a hot a– mess, honey,” said Crockett as the leftist crowd laughed and applauded.

Read more:

Sick: Leftist Audience Applauds After Rep. Jasmine Crockett Calls Paralyzed Texas Governor Abbott “Gov. Hot Wheels”

“The House should censure Crockett for the venomous rhetoric she spews as a representative of the Democratic Party,” Weber told Fox News.

“It’s painfully obvious she was never taught a single thing about Texas class, as her behavior is a disgrace to everything Texas and the United States stands for.”

Preach, Congressman!

According to a draft of Weber’s resolution, Crockett’s comments are “discriminatory in nature” and part of a “continued series of inappropriate comments” from the unhinged Democrat.

Read the draft below:

Whereas on March 22, 2025, the Representative from Texas, Ms. Jasmine Crockett, spoke at a Human Rights Campaign event in a manner unbecoming of a Member of Congress, calling the Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, "Governor Hot Wheels," and a "hot ass mess."

Whereas the remarks from the Representative from Texas are discriminatory in nature and are the latest in a continued series of inappropriate comments expressed by the Representative from Texas, such as on May 16, 2024, during a House Committee on Oversight and Investigations hearing, Representative Crockett espoused inflammatory comments about the appearance of another Member of Congress: Now, therefore be it

Resolved, That—

1. Representative Jasmine Crockett be censured;
2. Representative Jasmine Crockett forthwith present herself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure; and
3. Representative Jasmine Crockett be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the Speaker.

Jasmine…words have meanings & actions have consequences.

I look forward to introducing my resolution to censure you for your words and actions. https://t.co/KKbxPgUUMA

— Randy Weber (@TXRandy14) March 25, 2025

The post Unhinged Leftist Rep. Jasmine Crockett Slammed with Censure Effort After Mocking Texas Governor Abbott’s Disability appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.