The mass build-up of data centers across the United States has sparked a massive backlash for mostly understandable reasons. But one anti-data center activist went too far, and a resurfaced video perfectly explains why.

As NPR reported last week, a Maryland woman named Taylor Frazier McCollum successfully helped block a $5 billion data center campus that was supposed to be built on nearly 90 acres of empty land in Landover, Md.

This land used to be Landover Mall.

In 2024, the developer that built the mall won approval from county planners for the data center.

McCollum lived less than a mile away from the proposed project and quickly sprang into action.

“I was like, ‘Oh, hell no,’” she told NPR. “Why would you want to bring water-polluting, diesel-generating data centers right down the street from where people live, work, play? It just didn’t make sense to me.”

McCollum then created a petition in June 2025 that initially failed to take off until the Marxist Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), which is linked to Beijing-based tech mogul and left-wing donor Neville Roy Singham, shared a video of her explaining the petition and accusing the data center developers of “environmental racism.”

With the PSL’s help, the petition garnered 25,000 signatures.

In September 2025, Prince George’s County executive Aisha Braveboy issued a ‘temporary’ moratorium on data center permits, halting the Landover project. This moratorium has been extended several times and is set to expire at the end of this year.

McCollum now wants the area filled with a trampoline park, which would generate far less revenue than the data center would.

Now, a video has emerged via The Daily Wire that explains the worldview of communists like McCollum and the fantasy world they live in.

In the video, McCollum claims that money is just a “made-up concept.” That is news to the billions of people around the world who use some form of currency every day to conduct business and make a living.

“Money, you know, is a made-up concept,” she says in the video. “We buy into it every day and choose to say that this has value, and that doesn’t have value.”

WATCH:

Maryland activist who blocked a $5 billion data center from coming to her cash-strapped county says “money is a made-up concept.” https://t.co/PGFHwqKWYp

— Brecca Stoll (@breccastoll) November 12, 2026

The post Activist Who Stopped $5 Billion Data Center From Being Built on Empty Land Makes a VERY TELLING Statement That Perfectly Explains The Worldview of Marxists Like Her (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Guest post by Terry Newsome

A long-running Rose City ANTIFA Facebook Page and many others remain active on the platform even after being designated as a domestic terrorist organization.

Facebook continues to show a clear double standard. It allows ANTIFA-linked pages and users to remain active—even after the White House’s September 22, 2025 Executive Order that designates ANTIFA a “domestic terrorist organization” and directs agencies to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle illegal operations by ANTIFA or anyone claiming to act on its behalf. Facebook ignores the designation while restricting conservatives who document confrontations, acts of violence, and targeted harassment.

ANTIFA cells weaponized Facebook to organize, track ICE, coordinate global activities, and target their adversaries. Conservative pro-ICE supporters have faced coordinated efforts in which ANTIFA-linked users stalked their accounts, posted threats and derogatory comments, and launched mass-reporting campaigns.

Facebook defines mass reporting as an adversarial tactic—coordinated networks working to get content “incorrectly taken down”—and its Inauthentic Behavior rules explicitly prohibit misusing the reporting system to harass, intimidate, or silence people. Yet when Antifa-linked users have flooded videos and posts that document confrontations, Facebook has repeatedly issued penalizing strikes and account restrictions against the people posting that material.

One clear example is Facebook’s long-running tolerance of Rose City ANTIFA, one of the country’s oldest and most active cells. This group has a documented history of violence and doxxing—including members tied to the June 2019 beating of journalist Andy Ngo in Portland, for which some individuals were later ordered to pay damages in civil court—and has targeted law enforcement.

In August 2026, the State Department and Treasury designated the Italy-based Autistici/Inventati network as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist for supplying encrypted tools, hosting, and other digital infrastructure used by Rose City ANTIFA and other Antifa-linked cells. DHS and the State Department have specifically flagged the group (and closely associated sites such as Rose City Counter-Info) for doxxing ICE officers and issuing threats against them.

Despite these actions and the group’s record, Facebook has allowed Rose City ANTIFA to maintain an active page. Facebook’s stated policy of removing groups that pose significant public-safety risks has not resulted in the page’s removal—even after multiple reports and public criticism—while the platform continues to restrict conservatives who document ANTIFA confrontations and has not applied equivalent scrutiny to the harassment and mass-reporting campaigns directed against them.

One clear case involves videos from the Chicago ICE Center. A lone 71-year-old man holding a “I Support Law Enforcement” sign was surrounded by protesters and ANTIFA members, including Fran Ocequeda and Harrison Quinn Wahl, who verbally assaulted the elderly man. Illinois conservative activist Terry Newsome was driving past, stopped to help, and immediately became the target. Ocequeda got in his face and threatened to kill him while he was surrounded; Newsome responded aggressively after the threat. Facebook removed Newsome’s video of the confrontation and issued a violation strike. His account then faced limits: no monetization, no recommendations to other users, restricted features, and content not recommended to non-followers. The response ignored the video evidence of who initiated the confrontation with the elderly man and the threats that followed.

Fran Ocequeda and others surround Newsome at the Chicago ICE Center after he stops to help a 71-year-old veteran after being assaulted. Facebook gave Newsome a violation for posting the confrontation. The Facebook moderator calls ANTIFA “private citizen protesters.” Judge for yourself.  WARNING: ADULT LANGUAGE

Watch here.

The Gateway Pundit obtained an internal communication from Facebook’s moderation team addressing a request to review the targeted harassment of Terry Newsome’s account and reconsider the strikes he received through coordinated mass reporting by ANTIFA. In the response, the moderator said the account had not been disabled but faced limits of no monetization, no recommendations to other users, and some restricted features stemming from a series of strikes for content that broke Community Standards. The reviewer claimed to have looked at every active strike, with extra care on a specific video, and concluded that most strikes were for “repeated content attacking or insulting private individuals, including protesters.” The moderator said these were applied correctly and in line with policies, found no sign that political views played any part, and noted that a second review by the policy team confirmed the decision. Remaining strikes would stay in place until they expire.

Facebook moderator’s description does not match the facts. The claim that Newsome’s strikes were justified for attacking ordinary “private individuals, including protesters” is false.

The people Newsome interacted with—whether through posts documenting confrontations or responses to those harassing and stalking him on his own page—were ANTIFA members or far-left radicals who were the aggressors. Video shows them surrounding and harassing an elderly man, issuing threats, and then using mass community reports to trigger enforcement against the person who recorded it.

If the moderation team had actually looked at the context, the identities of those involved, or the pattern of coordinated reporting instead of accepting surface-level claims, the strikes for exposing ANTIFA activity would not have been upheld. Instead, Facebook protected the aggressors while penalizing Newsome’s visibility, growth, monetization, and account health for pushing back. The moderator’s assertion that political views played no role and that the strikes were correctly applied ignores the evidence and reflects a clear double standard.

Facebook’s moderators repeatedly described the people in Newsome’s videos and interactions as ordinary “private individuals, including protesters.” The following clips show additional confrontations with the same category of individuals at ICE-related events—none of which resulted in strikes against Newsome, but which illustrate the people Facebook has characterized that way.

March 8, 2026, at the Broadview ICE facility (the same location where Emily Cahill was assaulted). Raven Geary, an ANTIFA-associated activist, spits in Newsome’s face. Broadview police charged her with assault.

Watch here.

On January 17, 2026, Emily Cahill—a local conservative ICE supporter and leader of Protest the Protesters, was brutally assaulted at the Chicago/Broadview ICE center while simply holding a “We Love ICE” sign. Anti-ICE organizer Chela Garcia snuck up behind her, ripped her hair, and punched her repeatedly. When Cahill tried to fight back, a pack of male Antifa members grabbed and held her so Garcia could continue her assault.

Watch here.

Emily Cahill’s Facebook post of the Assault by Chela Garcia and ANTIFA at the Broadview ICE Center

The January 17, 2026 Broadview rally was organized by Indivisible collaborator Carlos Álvarez-Aranyos, founder of American Opposition and a key strategist behind anti-Trump and “No Kings” protests. Álvarez-Aranyos previously worked for Protect Democracy, a group funded by George Soros’s Open Society Foundations.

Newsome reposted Cahill’s original January 17^th Facebook post of the assault—Cahills identical post is still up on her page while Facebook removed Newsome’s for a violation.  He appealed. Human moderators reviewed the clear video of ANTIFA and Garcia assaulting Cahill but still upheld the strike. Facebook once again protected ANTIFA attackers while punishing the conservative who documented their violence.  Facebook admits coordinated mass reporting as a problem, yet it still refuses to explain why its human moderators keep showing clear bias against conservative accounts.

Emily Cahill’s post of the January 17^th assault. Cahill’s post remains up while Newsome’s was removed due to mass fake reporting by ANTIFA.

Watch here.

Other strikes followed the same pattern. They covered replies to users who were already targeting and commenting on Newsome’s account, along with posts that exposed ANTIFA activity. Facebook claimed these posts violated its policies on bullying, harassment, hateful conduct, or violence and incitement. The appeal response failed to address the prior stalking, the coordinated mass reporting, or the fact that the people initiating contact were the aggressors.

Recently, another conservative, Tom Kaz—known on Facebook as the Crazy Conservative Roofer—was at the same Broadview ICE Center where Terry Newsome and Emily Cahill were previously assaulted. While reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, he was verbally harassed by ANTIFA members who yelled “F*** You” at him through a bullhorn. He posted the video of the confrontation on Facebook; it was removed for “hateful conduct.” Once again, the conservative who documented the confrontation was punished.

Tom Kaz (“Crazy Conservative Roofer”) Facebook post of him reciting the Pledge of Allegiance while being verbally assaulted by ANTIFA. Facebook removed the post for “hateful conduct.”

Watch here.

Facebook removed one of the Crazy Conservative Roofer’s posts of him saying the Pledge of Allegiance while being verbally assaulted. It also took down another video showing Christian conservatives protesting. Facebook justified the removals under its community standards, labeling the content as potentially containing “symbols, glorification or support of people and organizations we define as dangerous.”

The irony is hard to miss. A cross, a Bible, and Americans reciting the Pledge of Allegiance were treated as dangerous, while Facebook continues to allow active pages and organizing by ANTIFA. The screenshot on the far right shows Muse, Facebook’s AI, responding to the conservative’s questions about why his account was suddenly targeted after he counter-protested at the Chicago/Broadview ICE Center. The AI’s answer was not surprising: it indicated the account had become the target of mass reporting.

This enforcement contrasts with Facebook’s aggressive removal of Proud Boys content and bans on the group. While ANTIFA—described in the September 22, 2025 Executive Order as a militarist, anarchist enterprise that uses illegal means including organized riots, assaults on ICE and law enforcement, and doxing to suppress lawful political activity—maintains a presence and weaponizes reporting tools, Proud Boys material is routinely removed.

The result is a platform that allows a group designated a domestic terrorist organization by Executive Order to organize, harass, and silence conservatives through mass reporting, while penalizing the people who record the confrontations or push back. Facebook’s claim that political views played no role does not hold up against the pattern of removals, the content of the videos, the internal moderation response that treated ANTIFA aggressors as ordinary “private individuals and protesters,” or the platform’s double standard toward other groups. Those who coordinate false or bad-faith mass reports to trigger enforcement should face consequences under Facebook’s own rules against misusing the reporting system. Conservatives documenting ANTIFA activity should not be the ones restricted while the original aggressors continue operating freely on the platform.

The post EXCLUSIVE: Facebook Labels ANTIFA Aggressors “Private Individuals” and “Protesters” While Striking Conservatives Who Document Them appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A young conservative reporter caused an entire CNN panel to push back Thursday night after blowing up a huge media narrative about last week’s midterm elections.

Following the election, media outlets were quick to blame ICE deportations as a major reason for Hispanics abandoning the Republican Party and costing the GOP valuable Senate seats.

Establishment Republicans such as Nikki Haley were also quick to blame Trump’s deportation policy as a contributing factor in the GOP’s losses.

But The Federalist’s Brianna Lyman had some facts to share with CNN viewers.

Lyman revealed that the real reason Hispanics abandoned Trump was due to the economy, not immigration.

To provide more evidence of the overhyped narrative regarding Hispanics, Lyman noted that Democrats barely talked about ICE during the general election.

Instead, they focused on affordability and cost-of-living measures to win over GOP voters.

Why would Democrats take this approach if the issue of immigration were such a powerful weapon to wield against the GOP?

Upon hearing Lyman’s argument, the entire CNN panel started groaning and tried to shout her down.

WATCH:

Lyman: “Latinos knew what President Trump was promising in 2024 at the RNC convention, they held up signs saying ‘Mass deportations now!’

It was never a mystery about what Trump would do in terms of deportations, and Latinos still swung for him. If you look at exit polls, you will find that Latinos ranked the economy as their top priority this cycle.

It‘s also interesting: Axios came out with a report that found during the primary season, Democrats made ICE the third most popular topic talked about but when they entered the general election, it became the 35th topic talked about. Why? Because even Democrats understand that to win a general election, you couldn’t oppose immigration enforcement.

Americans should not cede their sovereignty because you all have suicidal empathy.”

* ENTIRE PANEL MELTS DOWN *

— Brianna Lyman (@briannalyman2) November 13, 2026

One could say Lyman got a taste of what Scott Jennings regularly deals with as the voice of reason on such panels.

But like him, she maintained her cool throughout while the leftist loons humiliated themselves.

This is the type of spine conservatives will need over the next two years.

The post WATCH: CNN Panel TRIGGERED After Conservative Journalist Blows Up a Major Media Narrative About the 2026 Midterms appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Texas House Rep. Suleman Lalani, a physician originally from Pakistan, didn’t wait long for the blue wave to subside before filing bills in the state to promote Islam.

Democrat Lalani was first elected on November 8, 2022, in the general election for the newly drawn Texas House District 76, which includes parts of Fort Bend County, including Sugar Land, Stafford, and nearby areas. He was sworn in on a Quran.

Hey Texas….

Just a quick reminder that YOUR Two Pakistani-born lawmakers, Democrats Suleman Lalani and Salman Bhojani, were sworn in on the Quran. https://t.co/jD8ycOzXHm

— Amy Mek (@AmyMek) January 18, 2026

According to The Daily Signal, although bill filing only opened on Monday, Lalani has already put forth a flurry of bills covering everything from establishing a “Muslim Heritage Day” to ensuring halal food is provided in schools.

From The Daily Signal

Lalani filed House Bill 236, which amends Chapter 662 of the Texas Government Code to recognize Feb. 4 as Muslim Heritage Day in the state. The bill states that the day would recognize the historical, cultural, and social contributions of Muslim Americans to Texas.

In addition to filing HB 236, he also filed House Resolution 16, which would formally recognize the Islamic holy month of Ramadan in 2027.

The ceremonial resolution would honor Muslims who observe Ramadan in the state and would “extend to Muslims across the Lone Star State sincere, best wishes for a joyous and meaningful observance.”

From the resolution:

WHEREAS, The ninth month of the Islamic calendar year, Ramadan is a time when Muslims reinforce their spiritual beliefs by
fasting, worshipping, reading the Quran, practicing self-discipline, and helping the less fortunate; in 2027, Ramadan is beginning on the evening of February 7 with the expected appearance of the crescent moon and lasts for the remainder of the
lunar month; and

WHEREAS, During Ramadan, Muslims abstain from food and drink from sunrise until sunset in an effort to deepen their faith and to better understand the plight of the poor and hungry; Muslims break their daily fasts by sharing meals, known as iftars, with family and friends; and

WHEREAS, Muslims have been a part of the fabric of America since the 1500s, when the first Muslims arrived as slaves with
colonial expeditions; today, Islam is one of the world’s major religions, with many followers across the United States and around
the globe; and

WHEREAS, While focusing on their spiritual growth during Ramadan, Muslims affirm their commitment to working toward the
collective good of society and the well-being of people from all walks of life, and it is indeed fitting to acknowledge the significance of this special occasion to people of the Muslim faith who call Texas home; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives of the 90th Texas Legislature hereby recognize the holy month of Ramadan 2027 and extend to Muslims across the Lone Star State sincere best wishes for a joyous and meaningful observance.

Lalani also wants to force public schools to provide halal food for students.

HB 401 would require public school districts and open-enrollment charter schools in the state to mandate halal meal options when a parent or student requests one.

We were warned.

Read More:

John L. Kachelman, Jr.: EMBRACING THE ISLAMIC INVASION

The post Not Wasting Time: Muslim Texas State Rep Files Bills Promoting Islam, Official Recognition of Ramadan and ‘Religion-Compliant Food’ in Schools appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

On September 4, 20206, following a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, the Mount Sinai Health System agreed to stop providing puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and related surgical procedures to patients under 18.

The network includes the main Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, as well as its affiliated hospitals, medical centers, and clinics across the New York area.

In addition, it also agreed to pay a monetary penalty and set aside $2 million for free medical care for people who experienced harmful effects from such treatments received as minors. Mount Sinai stated it entered the deal to protect patient privacy and avoid releasing sensitive records to a grand jury, and it denied wrongdoing.

During a recent protest outside the main hospital, a woman claims that, rather than answer her questions or engage in civil debate, a prominent LGBTQ+ activist allegedly assaulted her.

Fox News reports that the counter-protester, Christiane Torello, claims she was allegedly elbowed in the chest by Jay Walker, the president of Gays Against Guns, who also served as a 2026 NYC Pride Grand Marshal.

“The hospital is no longer providing any type of gender-affirming care for minors, including surgeries, puberty blockers and hormones,” Torello told Fox News Digital. “There’s always a group of individuals who go to these protests to show their discomfort and displeasure with the hospital stopping these procedures because they want the children to transition. I usually go there in opposition to them. I support the hospital’s decision to stop providing that care. I always go by myself and ask questions.”

In the video she captured of the incident, Torello questioned Walker why he wanted to “have penises in the locker room” as he was yelling and walking away from her on a sidewalk. Walker then stopped, wound his elbow up and allegedly struck her in the chest before repeatedly shouting at her to “get away from me.”

*********

Torello said Walker was shouting slurs at her as he was walking away from the protest and she followed him to question him more about what he was saying.

Watch here.

In January of 2025, President Trump issued an executive order, Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation,  restricting ‘gender-affirming care’ across the country. The order applies to all individuals under 19.

The order impacts all federally run insurance programs, including TRICARE for military families and Medicaid. Moreover, all federal funding for medical schools and hospitals will be revoked if they practice child mutilation.

The executive order reads in part, “It is the policy of the United States that it will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another, and it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures.”

“This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation’s history, and it must end,” the order adds.

The post Woman Questions Transgender Transitions for Minors and is Met with Alleged Physical Assault By Trans Activist appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.