Warpig Lindsey Graham: A Russian Victory in Ukraine Will Be Worse than the Withdrawal of US Troops From Afghanistan (VIDEO)
June 4, 2025
Lindsey Graham shares a tender moment with Volodymyr Zelensky during Ukraine visit.
Warpig Lindsey Graham traveled to Ukraine this past weekend to pump up the hopes of the Ukrainian leader in the country’s ongoing war with Russia.
During his visit to Europe, Graham told reporters that a Russian victory in Ukraine would be worse than the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan.
Lindsey is getting desperate.
The globalist warmongers fear Trump’s work to bring peace to the region. The warmongers are shooting for World War III.
Senator Lindsey Graham: “The American withdrawal from Afghanistan was a terrible decision. It triggered the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It made America look weak in the eyes of the world. I told President Trump this privately, and now I’m telling him publicly: If this war ends as if we abandoned Ukraine, it will be even worse than leaving Afghanistan, and it will be a serious blow to global stability.”
Rep. Luna TORCHES House GOP for Delays in Codifying Trump’s DOGE Agenda Till Next Week
June 4, 2025
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna just scorched the House GOP for failing to act on President Trump’s America First spending cuts while hiding behind weak excuses and procedural delays.
On Tuesday, President Trump officially sent his long-anticipated $9.4 BILLION DOGE rescissions package to Congress. The package—a cornerstone of Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative led by Elon Musk—would eliminate wasteful spending at:
USAID
NPR
PBS
The U.S. Institute of Peace
Other bloated foreign aid boondoggles
#BREAKING: President Trump has OFFICIALLY sent the first $9 BILLION DOGE rescissions package to Congress
It guts funding for: USAID PBS NPR US Institute for Peace Other foreign aid programs
The first of many. House GOP needs to get on this NOW.
But instead of moving swiftly to codify Trump’s executive orders and deliver on the promises made to millions of Americans, the House GOP dragged its feet—and Rep. Luna is having NONE of it.
“Back in DC. Come to find out the Rules Committee and House Leadership STILL haven’t brought Trump’s Executive Orders or ANYTHING to codify DOGE to the floor,” Luna wrote.
“NO CODIFY VOTES? Then guess what: NO VOTES. Half the reason GOP took the majority is because of Trump and Elon and now they are too scared to codify!”
Back in DC.
Come to find out the Rules Committee and House Leadership STILL haven’t brought Trump’s Executive Orders or ANYTHING to codify DOGE to the floor.
NO CODIFY VOTES? Then guess what: NO VOTES.
Half the reason GOP took the majority is because of Trump and Elon and now…
Luna accused her own party of cowardice and betrayal—saying they’ve wasted months of momentum since Trump’s return to power by stalling on key legislation that would gut globalist programs and re-center government spending around the American people.
She continued, “The House GOP will blame everyone else for their inaction. This week they’re hiding behind the White House. We could have started legislation on rescissions and codifying POTUS/DOGE Agenda MONTHS ago. 77.3 million Americans voted for Trump—and they’re DONE with the excuses.”
The @HouseGOP will blame everyone else for their inaction.
This week they’re hiding behind the White House.
We could have started legislation on rescissions and codifying POTUS/DOGE Agenda MONTHS ago.
77.3 million Americans voted for Trump—and they’re DONE with the excuses.
Later, she added an update: “UPDATE: I received a call and am being told we will start codifying DOGE cuts next week. This is still a lame excuse… But so we are CLEAR: if you do not put DOGE or Trump EO’s on the floor next week, I will be a NO on EVERY single rule—and I am positive I will not be alone.”
UPDATE: I received a call and am being told we will start codifying DOGE cuts next week.
This is still a lame excuse. This could have started weeks ago.
But so we are CLEAR: if you do not put DOGE or Trump EO’s on the floor next week, I will be a NO on EVERY single rule, and…
Luna’s declaration comes as Speaker Mike Johnson, along with Leader Steve Scalise, Majority Whip Tom Emmer, and House GOP Conference Chairwoman Lisa McClain, released a tepid joint statement praising Trump’s rescissions but stopping short of committing to aggressive codification.
“Today, the House has officially received the rescissions request from the White House to eliminate $9.4 billion in wasteful foreign aid spending at the State Department and USAID and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS.
Now that this wasteful spending by the federal government has been identified by DOGE, quantified by the Administration, and sent to Congress, House Republicans will fulfill our mandate and continue codifying into law a more efficient federal government. This is exactly what the American people deserve.
Next week, we will put the rescissions bill on the floor of the House and encourage all our Members to support this commonsense measure.”
Major corporations are obviously not immune to this drivel (heck, even when it’s not a month celebrating sin), and shopping conglomerate Walmart is no exception.
While Walmart’s annual LGBT-themed merchandise bonanza is usually met with mild annoyance, this year, it appears to have backfired much worse than usual.
And that’s because it’s not just the non-LGBT crowd rolling their eyes at this nakedly performative nonsense this year.
Walmart appears to have members of the actual LGBT audience rolling their collective eyes, too.
As noted by the Washington Examiner, a viral clip from an otherwise small LGBT content creator on TikTok blew up after she showcased some dreadful Walmart merchandise that has her (jokingly) questioning her own sexual identity.
The clip, which has garnered over five million views and thousands of comments, featured the TikToker shopping at a Walmart, and commenting on some of the merchandise.
The video has since similarly gone viral on social media platform X, where it’s also been seen millions of times after being shared by various accounts.
Trending Politics co-owner Collin Rugg shared the video on X, and that alone has over 5.5 million views, as well as a litany of comments.
You can view Rugg’s post — and the viral TikTok video — below:
Lesbian says she doesn’t want to be gay anymore after Walmart released its new Pride Month shirts including a “Homo Estas?” shirt.
“Walmart really making me not wanna be gay no more… we can just go ahead and skip Pride Month,” the woman said.
“Not even going to lie to y’all, Walmart really making me not even want to be gay no more,” the TikToker said, before cutting to a shirt that said “Homo Estas” (seriously), a play on the Spanish phrase “como estas” or “how are you?”, with “homo” spelled in rainbow font.
Various other shirts showing off similarly gay-centric puns were shown.
“We could just go ahead and skip ‘pride’ month, because …” the TikToker said at the end of the clip, before trailing off with an awkward expression on her face.
The comments under both Rugg’s post and the original TikTok post were inundated with mocking responses, poking fun at Walmart’s creative department.
Look, this is just one (albeit viral) post, so it’s impossible to say anything definitive is happening here.
But it’s undeniable that the election of President Donald Trump brought with it a sweeping sigh of relief across America.
People no longer felt beholden to far-left shackles, which obviously includes the LGBT agenda, and no longer felt the need to tiptoe around these sensitive issues.
Good.
Silence out of fear of persecution from the vocal minority never made sense to begin with, and it’s high time that sanity reclaims its rightful place in society.
Forced LGBT support is one such shackle that much of America is breaking free of. You can see it with the dwindling support and funding for LGBT causes anywhere outside of deep-blue havens like Los Angeles or New York City.
But while much of America is breaking free, it’s clear that these major corporate entities cannot — for whatever reason — learn the same lesson. And it’s backfiring in their faces.
This sort of merchandise will alienate anyone who doesn’t want to celebrate sodomy; that much goes without saying.
But now this hollow, vile merchandise is turning off the very audience it’s aimed at?
It’s poetic, and a perfect microcosm of the left’s atrophying power under Trump.
WATCH: Ted Cruz Causes Cory Booker to Snap with a Simple Question During Hearing on Federal Judges – Then Cruz Finishes Him with a Blunt Reply
June 4, 2025
Credit: C-SPAN Screenshot
An explosive exchange erupted on the Senate floor Tuesday afternoon, which ended with arguably the body’s biggest narcissist getting humiliated by perhaps the smartest one after one simple question and an epic reply.
As Fox News reported, Senators Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Cory Booker (D-NJ) went at it during a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing titled “The Supposedly Least Dangerous Branch: District Judges v. Trump. Cruz, the committee’s subchair, used his time to aptly point out how Democrats on the committee kept silent when threats against federal judges were made during the Biden regime, especially when conservative Justices such as Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas were targeted.
Cruz also slammed Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) for “unleashing” protesters to harass Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh before they ruled in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. This decision overturned Roe v. Wade.
For those who need a reminder, here is what Schumer said.
“I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
Booker quickly took issue with this simple truth and tried to gaslight Cruz in response.
“Will you indulge me for a moment? It’s just that something you said is actually dangerous and should be addressed,” Booker replied. “This implication that there was silence (from us) at a time there were threats on people’s houses is absolutely absurd.”
“I remember the rhetoric and the comments, the concern from (Senator Chris Coons (D-DE)),” Booker added. “I actually distinctly remember you, chairman, more than once condemning those attacks on, on, on Republican-appointed jurists.”
“To say things like that feeds just the partisanship in this institution, and feeds the fiery rhetoric. And it’s just plain not true. And I think you know that.”
“Facts are stubborn things,” Cruz fired back before citing U.S.C. Section 1507 to point out that it’s a crime to protest at a judge’s home. The reason for this, as Cruz noted, is because such a move could influence their decision and obstruct justice.
“Night after night, angry mobs were outside the Supreme Court Justices’ homes, and the Biden Justice Department prosecuted nobody,” Cruz added. “I would challenge my friend (Booker) to find a single Democrat Senator on this committee holding (then-Attorney General Merrick Garland) to account for not enforcing this law.
“I really appreciate that you’ve now shifted the accusation you made earlier. Your accusation was that we were silent in the face of protests at Supreme Court justices’ homes,” Booker retorted. “Again, we joined together in a bipartisan way, not only to condemn that, but to pass legislation to extend round-the-clock security protection, literally days after it was introduced, May 5th, passed the Senate in a bipartisan fashion on May 9th.”
“So if you’re saying that we didn’t criticize Merrick Garland…”
“Did the Biden DOJ go out and arrest a single person under this law?” Cruz interjected.
Upon hearing this, Booker tried to spin his way out, but Cruz wouldn’t let him. He asked the same question, this time providing an answer.
“Did the Biden DOJ arrest even one?” Cruz asked. “Again, the answer is no.”
This simple question drove Booker completely off the wall.
WATCH:
DANG: Senator Cory Booker tries (& fails) to call Senator @tedcruz A LIAR for exposing Democrats’ DESPICABLE hypocrisy.
They said NOTHING about the attacks on the American judiciary — especially when the lives of conservative SCOTUS justices were in danger.
“I did not interrupt you, sir. I would appreciate it if you let me finish!” Booker roared while Cruz laughed at him. “I am sick and tired of hearing the kind of heated partisan rhetoric, which is one of the reasons why we have such divisions in this country!”
“The attacks we see from the President of the United States of America, trolling and dragging judges through, is what we should be talking about that puts people in danger,” he continued. “I’m simply taking issue with the claim that you made at the top, that people on the Democratic side of the aisle do not care about the safety and the security of judges, and said nothing.
You said we were silent after people’s houses were protested. That is a patent lie, sir. We were not silent. We took action.
Cruz quickly noticed that throughout Booker’s tirade, he completely failed to answer the Texas Senator’s question but decided to give him one more chance.
When Booker refused again, Cruz drove in the dagger with a savage reply, which included a reference to Booker’s infamous nickname.
“So let the record reflect that Spartacus did not answer the question, and did not tell us whether the criminal law should be enforced, because he knows the answer is yes,” Cruz stated. “And he knows that the Biden Department of Justice was being wildly political and partisan in refusing to enforce the law because they disagreed with the Supreme Court Justices’ rulings.”
ICE Director Fires Back at Rep. Dan Goldman
June 4, 2025
Dan Goldman, a Democratic representative from New York, has become the subject of controversy after a series of social media posts in which he instructed immigrants on how to interact with ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers. In his messages, he provided legal advice and resources to help immigrants resist possible deportations, arguing that all New Yorkers have rights when interacting with immigration authorities. However, critics have interpreted these actions as an attempt to obstruct the enforcement of federal law, accusing him of facilitating deportation evasion by undocumented immigrants.
In response to these criticisms, Goldman defended his position, stating that his intention was to protect legal immigrants and U.S. citizens who might be mistakenly detained by ICE. His office claimed that the posts were aimed at people who could be victims of abuse by immigration authorities.
The controversy intensified when ICE Director Todd Lyons defended the use of masks by agents during operations, arguing that it was a security measure to protect officers and their families from potential retaliation. However, critics have questioned this justification, suggesting that the use of masks could be a tactic of intimidation and undermines accountability and transparency in ICE operations.
This debate reflects the growing tension around immigration policies and law enforcement in the United States, as well as the defense of criminals by the Democratic Party and far-left groups whose sole objective is to create ungovernability and crisis during the Trump administration, regardless of the well-being of American citizens.
Contrary to What the Media and Democrats Have Reported: No One Is Dying Because of the Big Beautiful Bill
June 4, 2025
Photo courtesy of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Hakeem Jeffries echoed the mainstream media when he said “PEOPLE WILL LITERALLY DIE” because of the One Big Beautiful Bill. This is a complete fabrication and the only people who will die are those able to work who refuse to do so.
The truth is that Medicaid will be strengthened for the very groups it was created to support — pregnant women, children, low-income seniors, people with disabilities, and other vulnerable families. By removing at least 1.4 million illegal immigrants from the program, ending taxpayer-funded gender transition procedures for minors, and cracking down on fraud and waste, the bill ensures that resources are directed where they belong: to American citizens in need.
Additionally, 4.8 million able-bodied adults currently enrolled in Medicaid are not working. The bill introduces simple, reasonable requirements, like those backed during the Clinton era, for work, education, training, or volunteering. These measures aren’t punitive; they’re designed to help people build better lives through the dignity of work. Even Joe Biden has supported work requirements in the past, making this a truly bipartisan solution.
The work requirements for able-bodied adults on Medicaid promotes self-sufficiency and restores dignity, providing people an opportunity to earn their own wages, rather than depending on handouts.
Public opinion strongly supports the implementation of work requirements for Medicaid. A recent KFF Health Tracking Poll found that 62% of adults favor such measures, including 82% of Republicans, 60% of independents, and nearly half of Democrats. The same poll also revealed that a large portion of the public is unaware that most Medicaid recipients are already working or participating in other qualifying activities.
This lack of awareness underscores just how dishonest Democrats and their media allies have been in portraying these commonsense requirements as some kind of new Trump-era tyranny, rather than a continuation of longstanding bipartisan policy.
Work requirements for public assistance programs are policies that condition eligibility on participation in employment-related activities such as job training, job searching, part-time work, or volunteering. These requirements have been applied or proposed for programs like Medicaid, SNAP (food stamps), child care subsidies, and public housing. Legally, work requirements are supported through federalism principles, particularly Section 1115 waivers of the Social Security Act, which allow states to pilot reforms that further the objectives of public assistance programs. Courts and policy experts have recognized states’ role as “laboratories of democracy,” granting them flexibility to experiment with initiatives like these.
Operationally, work requirements improve efficiency by directing aid to those who genuinely need it and helping able-bodied adults without dependents move out of poverty. They also reduce waste and abuse by encouraging employment and discouraging long-term dependency. Historically, these policies have shown success: following the 1996 welfare reforms, national caseloads dropped dramatically while employment among single mothers and low-income families rose significantly.
More recently, advocates have argued that work requirements can help rebuild the post-pandemic labor force by reconnecting millions of able-bodied adults to the workforce amid ongoing job shortages.
In addition to economic and administrative benefits, work requirements offer important social and health advantages. Studies cited by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have shown that employment is positively correlated with improved physical and mental health outcomes, including lower rates of depression, longer life expectancy, and reduced hospitalizations.
By promoting routine, responsibility, and self-sufficiency, work requirements encourage better habits and upward mobility. They also serve as a natural screening mechanism, ensuring that limited resources are directed to individuals truly in need while reducing unnecessary enrollment and making safety-net programs more sustainable in the long term.
Work requirements may also yield long-term benefits for families by promoting better outcomes for both parents and children. Proponents argue that requiring parents to work or participate in job-related activities helps break the cycle of dependency by modeling responsibility and discipline for their children.
A policy paper from the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) noted that “work is the best way to reduce dependency” and emphasized the importance of parents setting a positive example. Research by welfare expert Ron Haskins found that in some work programs—especially those that increased family income through earnings supplements—children showed modest improvements in academic achievement and social development, particularly when they were enrolled in center-based child care.
The evidence supports the idea that work requirements can contribute to both financial stability and improved educational outcomes for children. These findings strengthen the argument that welfare policy should not only address immediate financial need but also promote long-term self-sufficiency and family well-being.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
USAID
