Residents of the small town of Gardiner in Montana are outraged and saddened after a popular grizzly bear was discovered in the Yellowstone River decapitated and without its paws.

The grizzly’s headless body was discovered by a photographer who took a picture of the bear lying lifeless in the Yellowstone River near Gardiner.

After residents started asking questions, The Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks revealed they euthanized the bear after it broke into a home.

Morgan Jacobsen who works for the FWP stated, “On Thursday the bear had broken into a home. Fish, Wildlife and Park staff responded and was able to dispatch the bear while it was in the river.”

When Jacobsen was asked why the bear was found beheaded without paws, he stated, “Something that we are required to do as an agency by the US Fish, Wildlife and Parks Service is to remove any parts of that bear that had potential monetary value—so that includes the head and the paws.”

“After a grizzly bear is euthanized, where does its body go? Is it thrown away, or returned to the land it came from? Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP) says it depends on the circumstances.” https://t.co/9wG3OvCoMU

— Bear Trust International (@BearTrust) July 23, 2024

Per KBZK:

Early Monday morning, a photo of a headless, pawless grizzly bear was captured by a river guide on the Yellowstone River near Gardiner. The photo upset many who saw it.

I spoke with Morgan Jacobsen with FWP, who says,”Fish, Wildlife and Parks is aware of this grizzly in the Yellowstone River. This is the same bear that was removed after several weeks of conflict in Gardiner.”

Jacobsen says it was a capture effort that lasted several weeks after a food-motivated bear was continually attracted to the area.

“On Thursday the bear had broken into a home. Fish, Wildlife and Park staff responded and was able to dispatch the bear while it was in the river,” he says.

Grizzly shot b/c he was mischievous, decapitated and thrown like garbage into the river. We are among some very evil people. ⁦@YellowstoneNPS⁩ https://t.co/HlUHABLWEL

— 1776WorldWide (@Guns2A) July 28, 2024

The post Grizzly Bear Discovered Decapitated With No Paws at Yellowstone appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Harris campaign has repeatedly tried to falsely tie President Trump and his running mate, J.D. Vance, to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, earning the campaign fact-checks from multiple organizations.

A message for Trump and his Project 2025 pic.twitter.com/AzLhYVtLJY

— Kamala HQ (@KamalaHQ) July 24, 2024

At a rally in Wisconsin on Tuesday, Harris criticized Trump and “his extreme Project 2025 agenda.”

Harris then said, “Can you believe they put that thing in writing? Read it. It’s 900 pages. But here’s the thing. When you read it, you will see Donald Trump intends to cut Social Security and Medicare. He intends to give tax breaks to billionaires and big corporations and make working families foot the bill. They intend to end the Affordable Care Act. And take us back, then, to a time when insurance companies had the power to deny people with pre-existing conditions.”

This is despite the fact that Trump himself has publically distanced himself from it and pointed out that his platform is called Agenda 47.

CNN, of all places, fact-checked the Harris campaign and noted that the Harris campaign has “made a deliberate decision to brand all of Trump’s policies” as “Project 2025.”

From CNN:

Facts First: One of Harris’ claims about Project 2025 is false, while another is at least misleading. The Project 2025 document does not show that Trump intends to cut Social Security; the document barely discusses Social Security at all and does not propose cuts to the program. In addition, contrary to Harris’ suggestion, Project 2025 does not call to “end” the Affordable Care Act or eliminate its protections for people with pre-existing conditions. The document does criticize the Affordable Care Act, especially the law’s expansion of Medicaid, but makes clear it is advocating changes to the law rather than terminating the law entirely.

A Harris campaign official said the campaign has “made a deliberate decision to brand all of Trump’s policies” as “Project 2025,” since they believe “it has stuck with voters.” After the initial publication of this article, a Harris campaign spokesperson, Joseph Costello, added, “Project 2025 is a blueprint for many of the dangerous policies we know that a second Trump term would include, and it is indisputable that in his first term, Donald Trump repeatedly tried to cut Social Security and end the Affordable Care Act.”

Rob Bluey at The Daily Signal points out, “Another fact-check article, published Wednesday by VERIFY, a website devoted to stopping the spread of false information, debunked a myth that Project 2025 called for the elimination of individualized education plans, commonly known as IEPs.”

Many readers have asked us if Project 2025 would cut Individualized Education Plans, which are also known as IEPs. Here’s what we found: https://t.co/67LvfH4bVq

— VERIFY (@VerifyThis) July 24, 2024

USA Today also fact-checked the Harris campaign, saying, “Project 2025 is a political playbook created by the Heritage Foundation and dozens of other conservative groups, not Trump, who said he disagrees with elements of the effort.”

https://t.co/LEek6JP27N pic.twitter.com/3RpGNUuRqN

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) July 24, 2024

Reporter Ben Domenech took to social media to chastise the Harris campaign for trying to falsely tie V.P. nominee J.D. Vance to Project 2025, ” The Harris campaign is falsely representing this interview, which took place before Vance even announced a run for the Senate and years before Project 2025 existed. I know this because I’m the interviewer.”

The Harris campaign is falsely representing this interview, which took place before Vance even announced a run for the Senate and years before Project 2025 existed. I know this because I’m the interviewer. https://t.co/aoiUN1zfhS

— Ben Domenech (@bdomenech) July 27, 2024

The post Fact Check: Harris Campaign Admits It Lied About Trump appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Guest Post by Miriam Judith

Tommy Robinson, a prominent political activist and former leader of the English Defense League, has recently been apprehended following his massive rally in Trafalgar Square.

The arrest, as reported on Robinson’s verified social media accounts, claims that he was detained under the Terrorism Act 2000. However, the Metropolitan Police have denied these claims, stating that they are not involved and that no arrest under such legislation has occurred on their part.

EMERGENCY ADMIN POST – PLEASE SHARE FAR AND WIDE!!!!

We can confirm that Tommy Robinson has been detained by Police using powers afforded to them under the Terrorism Act 2000.

That’s right, you read that correctly, Tommy is being held by Police using counter terrorism… pic.twitter.com/i3nagtBbXY

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) July 28, 2024

The Background of the Rally and Arrest

Robinson’s rally, billed as a historic patriotic event, attracted thousands of supporters and featured speeches from several figures. The event’s highlight was the screening of Robinson’s controversial documentary, Silenced. This film, which deals with an incident involving a Syrian refugee and subsequent libel claims against Robinson, was banned by the High Court due to its content, which was deemed in contempt of court. Despite this injunction, Robinson was willing to defy the court ruling, in order to share important information with the public.

The film’s screening led to complaints which prompted police to investigate the matter. Initially, the authorities claimed ignorance of the specific film content.

The Metropolitan Police have since confirmed they are looking into the issue but have not provided clear details regarding Robinson’s alleged detention under anti-terrorism laws.

Good evening Nick, thanks for your message.

We did not know what films would be shown during the event. Organisers of protests are not required to share those details in advance. There is no power for us to compel them to do so.

Officers on duty for the event couldn’t…

— Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) July 27, 2024

The Use of Anti-Terrorism Legislation

Robinson’s social media posts suggest he was detained under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000. This provision allows police to exercise extensive powers, including searching individuals and seizing property without a warrant, and delaying the right to consult a lawyer. Such powers are typically reserved for cases involving serious threats to national security, such as imminent terrorist threats. The application of this law to Robinson, who is not charged with terrorism, has sparked controversy and claims of legal overreach.

Employing anti-terrorism legislation against Robinson is a misuse of the law, meant for extreme cases involving actual threats to public safety. This situation raises concerns about the proportionality of the response and whether the law is being used to address political and legal disputes rather than genuine security threats.

Historical Context and Legal Challenges

Previously, Robinson faced imprisonment for contempt of court after filming individuals linked to a trial, a move that many viewed as an overreach of judicial power. The Court of Appeal later overturned this decision, but Robinson was subsequently prosecuted again for similar issues. His ongoing legal battles highlight concerns about the consistent application of the law and the perceived targeting of controversial figures.

Public Perception and Double Standards

Robinson’s arrest and the broader context of his legal troubles have sparked significant debate about double standards in policing and the application of laws. Critics argue that far-left demonstrations, which have been associated with contentious issues and sometimes violent clashes, often receive little to no police intervention. In contrast, rallies supporting British values and figures like Robinson face rigorous scrutiny and legal challenges.

The perceived inconsistency in how different demonstrations are treated underscores broader concerns about bias within the legal and political systems. This situation not only raises questions about the fairness of Robinson’s arrest but also about the broader implications for civil liberties and political expression.

Conclusion

Tommy Robinson’s recent arrest, if confirmed to be under anti-terrorism legislation, represents a significant and troubling development. The use of such extreme measures against a figure with no terrorism charges highlights potential overreach and misuse of legal powers. As investigations continue, it is essential to critically examine the motivations behind such actions and ensure that laws are applied fairly and consistently. Robinson’s case underscores the need for vigilance against the abuse of power and the protection of fundamental civil liberties in a politically charged environment.

The post Tommy Robinson Allegedly Detained for Screening Banned Documentary ‘Silenced’ Under Anti-Terrorism Laws appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, the Paris Olympic organizers allowed a reenactment of The Last Supper with drag queens during the 2024 Olympics ceremony.

In the sickening opening ceremony, the scantily dressed drag queens stood behind a long table while mocking one of the most sacred images in all of Christianity. Worse, a young child was also spotted standing beside the drag queens in the performance.

Now, ESPN reports that the Olympic committee is scrambling to contain the fallout. On Sunday morning, Paris 2024 spokesperson Anne Descamps issued a so-called ‘apology’ if anyone was offended by the sick performance while maintaining they managed to celebrate “community tolerance.”

“Clearly, there was never an intention to show disrespect to any religious group. It (The opening ceremony) tried to celebrate community tolerance,” Descamps claimed during a news conference.

“We believe this ambition was achieved,” she added. “If people have taken any offense, we are really sorry.”

Translation: we have no regrets over the performance, and it’s your fault for misinterpreting our intentions, silly Christians.

Meanwhile, Christians worldwide remain livid that their faith was insulted at an event that is supposed to emphasize unity. The Daily Mail notes that THOUSANDS of Olympic fans have now vowed not to watch the event.

Hashtags #boycottOlympics and #boycottParis2024 trended globally Saturday and have continued into Sunday.

This follows one of the largest telecommunications providers in the United States yanking ads following the blasphemous performance.

From the Daily Mail:

Thousands of social media users have threatened to boycott the nascent Paris Olympics after its opening ceremony was widely panned on Friday.

Enraged viewers took to X where #boycottOlympics and #boycottParis2024 were seen trending over the course of the following day.

In particular, the appearance of a ‘naked blue man’ among a scene likened to the Last Supper angered many watching, especially Christians.

The post NO SHAME: Olympic Organizers Issue Pathetic ‘Apology’ for Cruelly Mocking Christians as Olympic Boycott Movement Grows appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

America’s border czar is missing in action as terrorists invade America.

The New York Post has exclusively reported that three dangerous Palestinian terrorists illegally crossed the southern border earlier this month before finally getting caught.

The outlet revealed that one of the terrorists had “salacious photos” on their phone, including a picture of a masked man holding an AK-47 rifle.

In addition to the Palestinians, federal authorities also captured an illegal from Turkey with suspected ties to terror groups. These illegals were part of a group of dozens who turned themselves into border agents at the San Diego sector of the U.S.-Mexican border, according to the Post.

Authorities have transferred the terrorists to Immigration and Customs Enforcement as the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force “investigates” their cases. It is unknown at this point which terrorist organization the three Palestinian invaders are affiliated with.

Border Patrol agents spoke to the Post Sunday about the impossible challenges they face thanks to Harris’s dereliction of duty. They explained they have no way of thoroughly vetting immigrants from across the globe, especially in San Diego.

This is because they are only able to access US terror watchlists and other American resources to determine terror threats. The Post notes border agents do not have access to terror or criminal databases from other countries.

One border agent told the outlet on the condition of anonymity that he has “probably” let terrorist slip into America due to having his hands tied.

“Knowing who these guys are, we have, like, no access to anything international. Like, we really don’t, and it kind of sucks,” he said.

“I wanted to get into Border Patrol and protect from terrorists,” the border agent added. “And it’s like, well, I probably let terrorists in the country.”

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesperson did not respond immediately to a request for comment from the Post.

Given the Biden regime’s reckless open borders policy, it is a miracle America has not been hit with another terrorist attack resembling 9/11.

But make no mistake, one is inevitable unless Donald Trump returns to the White House and shuts down the border.

The post Where’s Border Czar Kamala Harris? Three Palestinian Terror Suspects Cross the Southern Border Illegally Before Getting Caught appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.