TOO LITTLE TOO LATE: Caitlin Clark Named WNBA Player of the Year After Suffering a Year of Shocking Abuse

TOO LITTLE TOO LATE: Caitlin Clark Named WNBA Player of the Year After Suffering a Year of Shocking Abuse

TOO LITTLE TOO LATE: Caitlin Clark Named WNBA Player of the Year After Suffering a Year of Shocking Abuse
July 17, 2025

Too Little Too Late: Caitlin Clark received the ESPY last night for being the WNBA player of the year.

Last night at the ESPY awards, Caitlin Clark was named the WNBA Player of the Year.

This award is long overdue.

Unfortunately the WNBA is a broken and self-destructive league and it has broken Caitlin Clark.  The players, the coaches, the refs, and league management are the worst in the sports world.  It appears that they want to destroy their golden goose Caitlin Clark at times.  This award is too little too late. 

The jealous and egotistical monsters in women’s basketball (and yes, many are sexist and racist too) hated Caitlin Clark, not because she was mean, or had a big ego, or was racist… they hated her because she was the greatest and they were not going to let her be that in their league.  They were all jealous and hateful.

But no matter what they did, they couldn’t stop her.  Here is Clark scoring 9 points in less than a minute in a game earlier this year.

Clark, the greatest scorer and point producer when adding in points off of assists, was the best women’s basketball player in NCAA history.  She crushed NCAA scoring records and she brought a fan base bigger than any woman’s basketball player in US history with her to the WNBA.

The below chart shows how Clark is in a league of her own when adding points scored and points off of assists together.

Unfortunately, the WNBA didn’t want her or welcome her.  Clark suffers greatly in games in numerous ways.  The below example is how the players and the refs abuse Clark.

In this series, Clark is poked in the eye by the opposing player after grabbing and pulling Clark all game long.  When she wasn’t able to stop Clark, she poked her in the eye.  Then the opposing player assaulted her and pushed her.  Clark tried to get away but another opponent punched Clark in the back and then another player crashed Clark to the floor.  None of Clark’s teammates stood up for her when this happened.

The result of this exchange was a foul on the girl who slammed Clark on the floor, and a foul on Clark!

The greatest shooter in the history of the game is pummeled by opposing players, game, after game, after game.

This week Clark was injured again and may miss the All-Star game.  Clark has never missed a game since high school until this year in the WNBA.

Clark has already dealt with multiple injuries this season, missing 10 games in total — nine in the regular season and then the Commissioner’s Cup championship. She missed five games with a left quad strain and later sat out five more after injuring her left groin. This is uncharted territory for Clark, who did not miss any playing time for injury reasons at Iowa or during her WNBA rookie year.

While Clark was out earlier this year, the WNBA lost half its audience.

WNBA Panics as Attendance Collapses with Caitlin Clark Injury

Last year, the WNBA members on the Olympic Committee and the nasty coach of the WNBA’s Minnesota team (Cheryl Reeve), prevented Clark, the best player in the country from being on the Olympic team.  It was the worst decision in Olympic history in decades.  Clark could have brought so many more viewers to the game.  But they kept her off the team.

Clark, who was the leading voter-getter for the WNBA’s All-Star game, was provided an opportunity to trade All-Star players on her team with the other team.  Instead, she traded away her coach, which was Minnesota’s nasty coach Cheryl Reeve.

Clark is a fighter.  She handles all the challenges with grace.  But her games have gotten too difficult to watch because of the horrible players, refs, coaches and league.

In her last game the refs were again horrible.  They are seriously the worst.  Players can pummel the WNBA’s golden goose and they are never called for a foul.  Clark touches someone and immediately gets called for a foul.

This is all on the worst league in world history.  This happens all the time. It’s gotten to the point where basketball fans and fans of Caitlin Clark have had enough. It is no longer fun to watch. It’s like watching a boxer get pummeled with one hand tied behind his back.

The abuse happens every game.

The league’s front office, the coaches, the refs, the other players and her own teammates have been heartless, jealous and abusive to Clark who has carried the league since her first day.

In her last game Clark finally came undone. The refs were terrible then one ref said something totally nasty to the league’s Golden Goose.

Now the WNBA wants to honor Clark – Unfortunately it’s too little too late. Nobody wants to watch this abuse. Nobody.

The post TOO LITTLE TOO LATE: Caitlin Clark Named WNBA Player of the Year After Suffering a Year of Shocking Abuse first appeared on Joe Hoft.

The post TOO LITTLE TOO LATE: Caitlin Clark Named WNBA Player of the Year After Suffering a Year of Shocking Abuse appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Joe Hoft

Foundation for C.H.O.I.C.E. Empowers Students Betrayed by Public Schools and Unions

Foundation for C.H.O.I.C.E. Empowers Students Betrayed by Public Schools and Unions

Foundation for C.H.O.I.C.E. Empowers Students Betrayed by Public Schools and Unions
July 17, 2025

Guest post by Gregory Lyakhov

In states like New York, where education policy is often entangled with politics, school choice has become a polarizing topic. Progressive lawmakers, such as NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, have opposed charter schools, voucher programs, and even co-location policies that allow high-performing charter schools to use available space in public school buildings.

But while these policy debates play out, students in underserved communities remain trapped in underperforming schools with limited paths to success.

Against this backdrop, the work of Jessica Bartnick and her nonprofit, the Foundation for C.H.O.I.C.E. (Consider How One Individual Changes Everything), presents a compelling case for why grassroots mentorship and practical guidance matter more than slogans or ideological purity.

Founded in Dallas, Texas in 2014, Bartnick’s organization has made significant strides in supporting low-income high school students who often fall through the cracks of the education system. The Foundation’s 27-week, one-on-one mentoring program helps students navigate the college admissions process, secure scholarships, explore career paths, and develop critical life skills.

The program focuses on students from working-class families—many of whom are from single-parent homes or households where English is not the primary language. These are the very students who are most affected by the failures of public education and who are often overlooked in mainstream education reform efforts.

What sets Foundation for C.H.O.I.C.E. apart is its direct, practical impact. On average, each student mentored through the program secures over $60,000 in college funding. Beyond that, students are connected with businesses aligned with their interests, gaining real-world exposure to professional environments they might never encounter otherwise.

Whether shadowing medical professionals or participating in mock interviews at corporate offices, these experiences not only demystify the professional world—they also give students a reason to believe they belong in it.

Contrast this with the situation in New York. Despite spending more than $36,000 per student—more than any other state—the city’s public schools remain plagued by low test scores, high absenteeism, and declining student engagement.

Charter schools like Success Academy, which enroll a student population that is 98% minority and largely low-income, have demonstrated that dramatic academic gains are possible. Yet leaders like Mamdani continue to oppose their expansion, citing ideological concerns and claiming that school choice drains public funds.

In truth, charter schools operate with less funding per student than traditional public schools, and their success challenges the notion that more money alone can solve deep-rooted education problems.

Mamdani’s approach includes policies that sound inclusive on paper but do little to address academic performance. His support for the “People’s Budget,” which allocates millions to initiatives like increasing teacher diversity and funding inclusivity conventions, ignores the basic reality: children in failing schools need access to strong instruction, safe environments, and clear paths to higher education—not more bureaucracy.

Jessica Bartnick’s model offers a sharp contrast. As a private school parent and conservative, she fully embraces the core idea of school choice: that families, not the government, should be empowered to choose the best educational path for their children. Her organization doesn’t just criticize the system; instead, it builds an alternative for students to thrive within it.

Her copyrighted curriculum is used to train mentors from all backgrounds—no teaching certificate required—so they can guide students in everything from FAFSA applications to SAT prep to college interviews. The results speak for themselves: since its founding, Foundation for C.H.O.I.C.E. has supported more than 6,000 students and is on track to serve 2,000 more by 2030.

If liberal states like New York are serious about equity, they must reconsider their hostility to school choice and organizations like Bartnick’s. Denying families access to high-performing alternatives—whether charters, scholarships, or structured mentorships—doesn’t promote fairness. It entrenches failure.

Public school systems alone cannot meet the complex needs of all students. Grassroots nonprofits that deliver measurable, lasting change deserve greater attention and support. Bartnick’s work proves that when you give students guidance, access, and belief in their potential, they rise to the challenge. New York’s education policy must stop prioritizing ideology over outcomes. It’s time to learn from success stories like Foundation for C.H.O.I.C.E.—and build more of them.

The post Foundation for C.H.O.I.C.E. Empowers Students Betrayed by Public Schools and Unions appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Guest Contributor

Jim Comey’s Daughter Maurene Finally Fired from DOJ – When Will They Fire Comey’s Son-in-Law Who Prosecuted Jan-6ers?

Jim Comey’s Daughter Maurene Finally Fired from DOJ – When Will They Fire Comey’s Son-in-Law Who Prosecuted Jan-6ers?

Jim Comey’s Daughter Maurene Finally Fired from DOJ – When Will They Fire Comey’s Son-in-Law Who Prosecuted Jan-6ers?
July 17, 2025

#image_title

Fired and disgraced Jim Comey had two children working in the DOJ until yesterday when  Maurene Comey was reportedly fired by the DOJ.

Her brother-in-law is reportedly still with the DOJ.  When will he be fired as well?

Corrupt Jim Comey’s daughter Maurene is finally gone.

The Justice Department on Wednesday fired Maurene Comey from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, where she most recently led the prosecution of Sean “Diddy” Combs, multiple sources told ABC News.

This was long over due.  Maurene Comey was not only involved in the P. Diddy case, she also was involved in the Jeffrey Epstein case and the Ghislaine Maxwell cases.  Ultimately, Diddy was not found guilty of any child sex trafficking crimes with Maurene running the case.

We also know that Maurene Comey was blocking the release of documents in the Epstein case.

ROGER STONE Asks President Trump to Release DOJ Court Filings in Epstein Case that the DOJ, Including Jim Comey’s Daughter Maurene, Is Keeping Sealed

Also, Maurene Comey was part of the DOJ’s team that claimed that they lost the video of Epstein’s cell from the night of his death and then discovered the DOJ had the video the next day.  (We recently learned that this video has been altered.)

REMINDER: Jim Comey’s Daughter Maurene Reported that the Video of Epstein’s Cell on Night of His Murder Was Lost and Then Found

Maurene is finally gone.  With her goes her conflict of interest from being James Comey’s daugther.

However, this is not the only Comey family member working for the DOJ on big cases.

Jim Comey’s son-in-law, Troy Edwards, was a prosecutor on the Oath Keepers Jan 6 trial where Biden’s corrupt DOJ claimed based on bogus evidence that the Oath Keepers intended to commit an insurrection on Jan 6.

Edwards was quoted by the BBC in this case:

Federal prosecutor Troy Edwards said that by responding to Rhodes’ call to action following the 2020 election, the defendants accepted an “invitation to sedition”.

But defense lawyer Angela Halim argued that there was no concrete plan to disrupt proceedings and that Oath Keepers were in Washington that day to provide security, not to stop the government from carrying out its duties.

The problem with Edwards prosecuting Jan 6ers was that he had a material conflict of interest.  Troy Edwards is the son-in-law of James Comey who hates President Trump and the Jan 6ers and was involved in the Russia collusion attempted coup.

As of early March Comey’s son-in-law, Troy Edwards, was still at the DOJ and was part of the prosecution in the huge case surrounding Abbey Gate.

The DOJ released this statement in early March this year:

“This evil ISIS-K terrorist orchestrated the brutal murder of 13 heroic service members,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “Under President Trump’s strong leadership on the world stage, this Department of Justice will ensure that terrorists like Mohammad Sharifullah have no safe haven, no second chances, and no worse enemy than the United States of America.”

“The lethal attack that killed 13 American service members and Afghan civilians during the U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan was an act of terrorism,” said FBI Director Kash Patel. “ISIS-K brazenly claimed responsibility for the carnage. Now thanks to the assistance of the FBI, Department of Justice, and the CIA, we have secured Sharifullah’s apprehension and transport to the U.S. to face American justice. The FBI will never forget the loss of these American heroes, we will continue to hunt down those who viciously murdered our warriors, we will find all responsible and bring them to justice.”

“The charges announced today carry an unmistakable message: the commitment of the United States to hold accountable all who facilitate and carry out acts of terror against us will never waver,” said U.S. Attorney Erik S Siebert for the Eastern District of Virginia. “Our message to those who have been impacted by these horrific crimes is that you are not forgotten. We will continue to pursue justice no matter how long or how far it takes us.”

On Aug. 26, 2021, American and other Coalition military forces were conducting an evacuation operation at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan. Abbey Gate was the main entry point for the operation. Thousands of civilians were at Abbey Gate for evacuation.

At approximately 5:36 p.m., ISIS-K member Abdul Rahman al-Logari detonated a body-worn suicide bomb at Abbey Gate, killing 13 U.S. military service members and approximately 160 civilians….

…Assistant U.S. Attorneys Michael P. Ben’Ary and Troy A. Edwards, Jr., for the Eastern District of Virginia and Trial Attorneys Alicia Cook, Charles Kovats, and Ryan White for the Department of Justice’s National Security Division are prosecuting the case.

What isn’t shared in this press release is that it was reported that those in charge at Abbey Gate on the day of the terrorist attack ordered the soldiers on hand to stand down and not prevent the suicide bomber from approaching.  Some believe that this would have prevented the death of American soldiers and others on that day.

Will Jim Comey’s son-in-law continue to run cases for the DOJ after Comey’s threats on President Trump’s life?  Will he be allowed to mess up the Abbey Gate trial?

The post Jim Comey’s Daughter Maurene Finally Fired from DOJ – When Will They Fire Comey’s Son-in-Law Who Prosecuted Jan-6ers as Well? first appeared on Joe Hoft.

The post Jim Comey’s Daughter Maurene Finally Fired from DOJ – When Will They Fire Comey’s Son-in-Law Who Prosecuted Jan-6ers? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Joe Hoft

Deputy AG Todd Blanche Signals Investigation into Rep. Salud Carbajal for Doxxing ICE Agent and Participating in Violent Mob – Carbajal Responds, Says Mob “Gathered to Defend Their Neighbors”

Deputy AG Todd Blanche Signals Investigation into Rep. Salud Carbajal for Doxxing ICE Agent and Participating in Violent Mob – Carbajal Responds, Says Mob “Gathered to Defend Their Neighbors”

Deputy AG Todd Blanche Signals Investigation into Rep. Salud Carbajal for Doxxing ICE Agent and Participating in Violent Mob – Carbajal Responds, Says Mob “Gathered to Defend Their Neighbors”
July 17, 2025

This X screen shot shows protesters fleeing a marijuana farm in California.
This X screen shot shows protesters fleeing a marijuana farm in California. (@KTLA / X Screen Shot)

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced on Sunday that the DOJ is reviewing reports that Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-CA) was involved in a violent riot and doxxed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

The alleged incident occurred during a ICE criminal warrant operation at a marijuana farm in Carpinteria, California.

ICE was conducting enforcement operations at two marijuana farms operated by Glass House Brands Inc. in Carpinteria and Camarillo when chaos unfolded. “More than 500 rioters attempted to disrupt operations,” and one even “fired a gun at law enforcement,” the Department of Homeland Security said in a press release.

The Gateway Pundit reported that Carbajal was at the scene and claimed that he was there to fulfill his “congressional oversight responsibilities.” However, ICE announced on Sunday that “Carbajal was part of a violent mob of protestors attempting to obstruct federal law enforcement as they executed a criminal search warrant at a marijuana facility.”

During the riot, rocks were hurled at agents, leaving “at least one ICE employee who was left bloody,” and “the congressman doxed that same ICE employee by sharing his business card with members of the violent mob,” the agency further alleged, citing reports from agents on the ground.

JUST IN: ICE Announces that Rep. Salud Carbajal DOXXED ICE employee who was “Left Bloody” by Left-wing Rioters at California Pot Farm – Carbajal Shared Agent’s Business Card with Violent Mob

It can be recalled that Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) was charged with three counts related to forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers at the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark last month. If convicted on all three charges, she faces a maximum of 17 years in prison!

Video from the incident clearly shows Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver screaming at and physically assaulting federal agents by shoving them and hitting them with her body repeatedly. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was also there, fighting for the release of dangerous criminal aliens.

McIver pleaded not guilty at her arraignment hearing on June 25.

If Carbajal was, in fact, participating in the violent riot, which injured ICE agents, and jeopardizing the lives of agents by doxxing them, he could face similar consequences.

Hopefully, the DOJ will actually take action to deter criminals like Carbajal and other Democrats encouraging violence against law enforcement.

Blanche said on X,

We take all allegations of inciting violence or doxing of federal employees very seriously—no one is above the law, and members of Congress are no exception. We are reviewing reports from the protest. If substantiated, we will pursue every appropriate legal avenue to protect our law enforcement officers and uphold the rule of law.

Carbajal fired back, attacking ICE and claiming that the group was "peaceful" and targeted by ICE:

This is a blatant attempt to distort what occurred in Carpinteria. DHS and ICE conducted their raid using a disturbing and disproportionate level of force, both on the farm workers they were targeting and the peaceful protesters who gathered to defend their neighbors. I witnessed agents, in full military gear, fire smoke canisters and other projectiles into a crowd of peaceful civilians. Just before I arrived at the scene, witnesses told me the agents threw a stun grenade into the crowd. Several civilians were injured, including a child.

This aggressive behavior in a normally quiet part of the Central Coast sparked alarm across our community, prompting a flood of calls and messages to my office from concerned citizens. I went to the scene to seek answers and represent my constituents.

ICE’s claims of “doxxing” and “violent mobs” are familiar deflection tactics designed to distort public perception and to evade accountability for their aggressive actions in our community.

This is a developing story. 

The post Deputy AG Todd Blanche Signals Investigation into Rep. Salud Carbajal for Doxxing ICE Agent and Participating in Violent Mob – Carbajal Responds, Says Mob “Gathered to Defend Their Neighbors” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jordan Conradson

Pentagon Withdraws from Aspen Conference: Exposing the Liberal Mega-Donor Network Behind Globalist Defense Summit

Pentagon Withdraws from Aspen Conference: Exposing the Liberal Mega-Donor Network Behind Globalist Defense Summit

Pentagon Withdraws from Aspen Conference: Exposing the Liberal Mega-Donor Network Behind Globalist Defense Summit
July 17, 2025

Photo courtesy of Donald Trump for President, via Facebook

 

The Pentagon pulled roughly a dozen senior Defense Department officials from the Aspen Security Forum on Monday, July 14, 2025, just hours before the event was set to begin the next day. The decision marked a sharp break from decades of Pentagon participation in what was once considered one of the premier national security conferences in the United States.

The withdrawal signals a deeper realignment of American military priorities, shifting away from globalist ideology and toward America First principles. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s move underscores the administration’s commitment to refocusing the military on its core mission of national defense, rather than supporting globalist, liberal, or ideological agendas.

Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson made the administration’s position unmistakably clear. “The Department of Defense has no interest in legitimizing an organization that has invited former officials who have been the architects of chaos abroad and failure at home,” he said. Wilson described the forum as promoting “the evil of globalism, disdain for our great country, and hatred for the President of the United States,” emphasizing that such values are “antithetical to the America First values of this administration.”

Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell emphasized the military’s renewed focus on combat effectiveness, stating, “The department will remain strong in its focus to increase the lethality of our warfighters, revitalize the warrior ethos, and project peace through strength on the world stage.” This marks a decisive break from what Hegseth has called the prior administration’s “experiments” in left-wing ideology, initiatives that, in his view, distracted the military from its core mission.

At the heart of the dispute is a clash between two visions of American foreign policy. The Pentagon’s America First doctrine prioritizes warfighting capability and national defense. In contrast, the Aspen Institute promotes a liberal globalist worldview centered on multilateral engagement and global governance. A closer examination of the Institute’s major donors reveals a network of foundations committed to advancing globalist policies that often conflict with American sovereignty and conservative principles.

Among these donors, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation stands out as one of the most influential globalist organizations funding liberal causes worldwide. As the second-largest contributor to the World Health Organization, providing $638.2 million, the Foundation has played a pivotal role in shaping international health policy.

Because more than 80% of WHO’s budget comes from voluntary donations, donors like Gates wield disproportionate influence over decisions that many argue should remain under the authority of sovereign governments. Critics have described this model as “global health imperialism,” claiming it imposes ideological agendas under the guise of public health and circumvents democratic accountability.

Gates has consistently opposed national control over healthcare policy. The foundation also promotes supranational digital ID systems, partnering with Mastercard and GAVI to link vaccination records to cashless payment platforms. Through initiatives like ID2020, Gates advances biometric identity programs tied to health and education, building global surveillance infrastructure that sidesteps democratic oversight.

The Carnegie Corporation of New York, another of the Forum’s donors, has long funded the liberal legal framework advancing progressive policy goals under the guise of nonpartisanship. Since 1994, Carnegie has given nearly $7 million to groups like the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) and the National Immigration Forum, both of which support mass immigration, amnesty, and opposition to border enforcement. Carnegie also funded the now-defunct ACORN, a radical community organizing network notorious for voter registration fraud and anti-capitalist activism.

Carnegie’s current $18 million “Political Polarization Research Program” frames conservative perspectives as drivers of division while promoting liberal policy agendas as solutions to national challenges. The foundation has given over $3.65 million to the Brennan Center for Justice, a group that opposes voter ID laws, supports automatic voter registration, and challenges election integrity efforts under the banner of “voting rights.” Through its Press Forward Initiative, Carnegie also leads a $500 million coalition to fund left-leaning journalism, all while claiming to support democracy.

Other Aspen Institute donors share similar ideological goals. The Raikes Foundation, for example, focuses explicitly on “racial equity,” “democracy,” and “building a robust multiracial democracy” through its Resourcing Equity and Democracy portfolio. It funds Planned Parenthood, LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, and organizations that aim to fundamentally transform American institutions. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation promotes government-run healthcare, endorses COVID lockdown policies, and drives DEI initiatives throughout the medical field.

The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, with $13.9 billion in assets, is a major funder of liberal and anti-capitalist causes. It supports climate activism, abortion which it frames as “reproductive rights”, and “democracy” initiatives that advance liberal internationalism. The now-defunct S.D. Bechtel Jr. Foundation directed millions to the Windward Fund, a fiscal sponsor for environmentalist projects linked to the left-leaning Arabella Advisors network, and also supported groups like the Environmental Defense Fund and the National Immigration Law Center.

This network of liberal foundations exemplifies the globalist ideology the Pentagon rejected at Aspen. These organizations leverage private wealth to build supranational governance systems that bypass national sovereignty and democratic oversight while promoting liberal social and economic agendas worldwide.

They elevate global institutions over American security interests, concentrate power in unelected elites, and champion social engineering that undermines traditional American values. The Pentagon’s withdrawal from the Aspen Security Forum marks a decisive rejection of this globalist framework in favor of a defense posture rooted in national sovereignty and America First principles.

The post Pentagon Withdraws from Aspen Conference: Exposing the Liberal Mega-Donor Network Behind Globalist Defense Summit appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Antonio Graceffo