Peter Hotez PANICS After Heavily-Vaxxed Caller Reveals “Worst Experience Ever” Post-Booster
July 26, 2025
This story originally appeared on VigilantFox.com and was republished with permission.
Infamous vaccine pusher Dr. Peter Hotez recently had an uncomfortable moment during what started as a softball radio interview on Hello Houston.
Everything was going his way. The hosts praised Hotez for battling “disinformation” and hung on to his every word as if it were gospel.
But then, things went off the rails when a possibly vaccine-injured woman called into the show.
Carol, who says she keeps up with her boosters, asked Hotez over the phone why she suffered the “worst experience [she] ever had” just two days after her last COVID shot.
The moment felt like watching a train wreck in real time.
She described how she was so exhausted she was sleeping 16 hours a day, and had a “really bad cough with deep phlegm.”
At first, Hotez assumed she’d had a severe case of COVID. But to his shock, Carol told him she had NEVER had COVID.
Hotez scrambled for an explanation:
“So, what possibly could have happened is in between the time you got the booster and the immune response kicks in, you could have gotten some intercurrent viral infection, such as Covid or flu or a gazillion other things. So sometimes it’s hard to know what’s ascribed to a SIDE EFFECT of the vaccine versus some other intercurrent illness.”
Notice that in the last line, Hotez says the quiet part out loud: “side effect.”
He realizes: “Oh, sh*t, this could be a vaccine-injured person.”
But instead of acknowledging that possibility, he spins an explanation to confuse her into thinking the symptoms could have come from something else—just two days after the shot.
Just watch the clip. It’s never the jab with these people.
And 73 exhibited ‘neurological signs incompatible with donation.’
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirms it has launched a “major initiative” to reform America’s organ-transplant system after it stunningly revealed that dozens of organ donors may not have been dead when the process to procure their organs was started, and dozens more exhibited “neurological signs incompatible with donation.”
“Our findings show that hospitals allowed the organ procurement process to begin when patients showed signs of life, and this is horrifying,” explained HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
“The organ procurement organizations that coordinate access to transplants will be held accountable. The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor’s life is treated with the sanctity it deserves,” he said.
A commentary posted at the Washington Stand on the situation highlighted one case:
“According to a partially redacted, eight-page report dated May 28, 2025, HHS received ‘an allegation of potentially preventable harm to a neurologically injured patient.’ This prompted the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the subdepartment of HHS that oversees the organ donation system, to launch an investigation after HRSA Administrator Thomas Engels assumed his post in February. The New York Times identified that victim as Anthony Thomas Hoover II, then 33 years old, who was hospitalized with a drug overdose in 2021. Hours after a doctor had declared him brain-dead, Hoover awakened to find medical staff preparing to remove his organs. ‘Even though the man cried, pulled his legs to his chest and shook his head, officials still tried to move forward.’ Hospital staff ultimately became ‘uncomfortable with the amount of reflexes’ Hoover showed, and a doctor ultimately refused to remove him from life-support. The man ultimately survived.”
HHS orders reform of organ donation system after investigation finds ‘horrifying’ practices ‘when patients showed signs of life.’ pic.twitter.com/7Usp5zwJPK
The US Department of Health and Human Services under RFK Jr. is announcing a major initiative to overhaul the organ transplant system after an HRSA investigation uncovered significant problems:
HRSA examined 351 cases where organ donation was authorized, but ultimately not… pic.twitter.com/lRDpcQGQTi
HRSA reported that it reviewed 351 cases where organ donation was authorized but ultimately not completed. It found 103 cases “showed concerning features, including 73 patients with neurological signs incompatible with organ donation,” “at least 28 patients may not have been deceased at the time organ procurement was initiated – raising serious ethical and legal questions,” and “evidence pointed to poor neurologic assessments, lack of coordination with medical teams, questionable consent practices, and misclassification of causes of death, particularly in overdose cases.”
Under the plan the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network has been told to reopen an investigation into one unidentified case, which had been closed under the Joe Biden administration.
The newest review suggested “clear negligence.”
Now being imposed are new corrective actions and system-level changes that are intended to safeguard potential donors.
The Organ Procurement Organization must “conduct a full root cause analysis of its failure to follow internal protocols—including noncompliance with the five-minute observation rule after the patient’s death—and develop clear, enforceable policies to define donor eligibility criteria. Additionally, it must adopt a formal procedure allowing any staff member to halt a donation process if patient safety concerns arise,” the government said.
Safeguards and monitoring also are being ratcheted up.
“These findings from HHS confirm what the Trump administration has long warned: entrenched bureaucracies, outdated systems, and reckless disregard for human life have failed to protect our most vulnerable citizens. Under Secretary Kennedy’s leadership, HHS is restoring integrity and transparency to organ procurement and transplant policy by putting patients’ lives first,” the report said.
The commentary from the Stand, by Joshua Arnold, noted Rep. Neal Dunn, R-Fla., worried that the story about the attempt to remove Hoover’s organs, “seems to be a story more fitting for a horror movie than a congressional hearing.”
Barry Mass, chief of Network for Hope, a federally funded OPO which works in Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia, appeared during a hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Oversight & Investigations Subcommittee recently.
He “could only respond with assent” to Dunn’s comments.
The commentary noted, “Such improvement in America’s organ transplant system was not forthcoming before the Trump administration exerted serious pressure. Despite the shocking details of Hoover’s case, the Membership and Professional Standards Committee (MPSC) of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) ‘closed the case without further action,’ even after Network for Hope’s reply ‘did not include the patient-level materials or administrative documents requested by the MPSC,’ according to the HRSA report.”
The federal study found many organ “donors” “had no cardiac time of death noted.”
“Such was the case with Hoover, who left the hospital four years ago and is still alive,” the commentary said.
The horror story details just continued, the commentary said, pointing out “multiple patients” were found to be evincing pain or discomfort while the staff was preparing to take their organs.
It explained, “In other words, like Hoover, overdose patients might seem dead because of the lingering effects of drugs, then gradually recover. If organ harvesters fail to recognize or record the effect of drugs on the patient, they may prematurely harvest organs from a patient set to fully recover.”
The commentary noted, “According to The New York Times, two former employees of Network of Hope said ‘higher-ups’ tried to pressure hospital staff to proceed with harvesting Hoover’s organs. ‘If it had not been for that physician [who refused to end life support], we absolutely, 1,000% would have moved forward,’ said Natasha Miller, an employee in the room. Three more former employees confirmed seeing similar cases.”
Stunningly, when eight members of the OPTN board resigned their positions, complaining about the Trump administration’s oversight plans, several industry groups, like the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, protested.
“These responses constitute angry warnings that the Trump administration will likely encounter serious opposition from the organ procurement and transplant industry. But the Trump administration is right to press such reform through, over the objections of industry participants, who as likely as not are part of the problem. As the HHS noted, an industry that shows ‘systemic disregard for sanctity of life” needs urgent reform,” the commentary said.
NFL Star Says He’s ‘Excited’ to Play for the ‘Washington Redskins’ After Trump Calls Out Team on Name Change
July 26, 2025
NFL veteran Von Miller referred to his new team by their former moniker Thursday, just days after President Donald Trump called on the Washington Commanders to reverse their name change.
Speaking with reporters after training camp, the Super Bowl MVP repeatedly used the term “Redskins” to describe his new team.
The Commanders changed their name in 2021 following pressure from left-wing activists.
But that hasn’t stopped longtime fans, or players, from still calling the team what it was for decades.
“My 15th year in the league, it never gets old,” Miller said, as Outkick reported.
“Especially being out of work for four months, perspective kind of changes a little bit.”
He added, “You know, back when you were young it was like, ‘Man why do we gotta go to OTAs? Man, I wish I was home.’ And then you’re sitting on the couch for four months, and it’s like, ‘Man, I wish I was at OTAs.’”
“The Washington Redskins called me a month and a half ago and started talking, signed and agreed to come here to Washington about a week and a day ago and here I am.” pic.twitter.com/rETgtLPmkR
“The Washington Redskins called me a month and a half ago and started talking,” he remarked. “I agreed to come here to Washington about a week and a day. Yeah, about a week and a day ago.”
He concluded, “I’m excited to be here.”
Miller’s choice of words came just days after Trump blasted the franchise for caving to the mob.
“The Washington ‘Whatever’s’ should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
“There is a big clamoring for this,” he added.
The president also called out MLB’s Cleveland Indians for their similar decision to adopt the name “Guardians.”
“Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,” Trump said of professional teams reverting back to their historic names and mascots.
Donald J. Trump Truth Social 07.20.25 10:17 AM EST
The Washington “Whatever’s” should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a…
— Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@DailyTruthPosts) July 20, 2025
“Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them,” he added.
Federal Immigration Judges Abruptly Fired Over Email Lash Out at President Trump Over Their Terminations (VIDEO)
July 25, 2025
Federal immigration judges fired by the Trump Administration over e-mail this month lashed out at Trump in an interview with CBS Evening News.
More than 100 immigration judges have been fired or resigned since President Trump took office this year.
In July, 20 immigration judges were fired.
Three of the fired judges – George Pappas, Jennifer Peyton and Carla Espinoza – spoke to CBS about their terminations. The disgruntled judges claimed they were politically pressured by the Trump Administration to grant motions to dismiss cases.
“It was arbitrary, unfair,” George Pappas told CBS News of his abrupt firing. “And it’s an attack on the rule of law. It’s an attack on judges.”
“My email was three sentences,” Jennifer Peyton whined. “I had no cause. I had no explanation.”
“We as judges, were in fear, we were concerned,” Carla Espinoza said. “That makes it very difficult to be impartial. We were not succumbing to that pressure but it does feel like pressure.”
Payton whined that once the illegal alien left the courtroom, ICE would handcuff them and whisk them away.
WATCH:
Former immigration judges are speaking out after sudden firings by the Trump administration, alleging political pressure and threats to due process in an already overwhelmed court system. CBS News’ @MauriceDuboisTV sat down with three judges who were terminated in July by email. pic.twitter.com/4JMjZEpNxj
George Pappas, Jennifer Peyton and Carla Espinoza were all federal immigration judges fired this month by email. The three ruled on thousands of immigration cases in Chicago and Boston.
Pappas served as an immigration judge in Boston until this week, overseeing more than 2,000 cases during his two years on the bench. Peyton led Chicago’s immigration court for nearly nine years, hearing thousands of cases until she was abruptly fired over the 4th of July weekend.
Peyton oversaw Espinoza, who was appointed in 2023 and decided more than 1,000 cases in the last fiscal year, double the average for immigration judges.
Peyton told CBS News she received no reason for her firing. Immigration judges are under the authority of the Justice Department’s Executive Office for Immigration Review.
DNC Chair Ken Martin Says His Party Has Hit Rock Bottom: ‘Only One Direction to Go, And That’s Up’
July 25, 2025
Screencap from Twitter/X video.
Ken Martin, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), recently suggested that his party has hit rock bottom, and that this is a good thing because they have nowhere to go but up.
Martin is partially right. Recent polling has found approval for Democrats is at a historic low, but he is wrong about the future. They could still actually go lower. All they have to do is keep acting as if they care more about illegal aliens than they do about the American people.
Democrats have shown absolutely no signs that they plan to stop going down the same road they are currently on, which could easily lead them to worse approval ratings.
Democrats have hit ‘rock bottom,’ party leader says; here’s his unorthodox rebound plan
Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin isn’t pulling any punches.
“There’s no doubt that … we have work to do,” Martin acknowledged in an extended, sit-down interview this week with Fox News Digital.
But the DNC chair sees President Donald Trump’s signature domestic achievement so far in his second term as ammunition that will help the Democrats rebound…
Martin noted that the party has continued to “lose ground with many parts of our coalition.”
But he sees a silver lining.
“When you hit rock bottom, there’s only one direction to go, and that’s up, and that’s what we’re doing,” Martin noted.
The party’s base is increasingly angry — and energized — to push back against Trump’s sweeping and controversial second-term agenda. And its anger is directed not just at the GOP but the Democratic Party lawmakers and officials who many feel haven’t been aggressive enough in combating the president.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.