The most infamous network in cable news could not handle the truth about what happened in the 2016 election, and quickly tried to hide the truth from their audience.

As The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft reported, DNI Tulsi Gabbard released her second batch of previously undisclosed documents on Wednesday morning. These documents include more proof that Barack Obama directly gave the order to publish the Russia Collusion hoax, knowing there was no proof to back it up.

Page three of this latest document drop shows that then-President Obama ordered the release of documents, knowing there was no evidence to back them up. Obama didn’t just know about the Russia hoax – he directed it. All to delegitimize Trump’s historic win.

Obama also helped cover up the blackmail Vladimir Putin had on Crooked Hillary Clinton, including her numerous health issues.

Today’s document release followed Friday’s document dump by Gabbard of a declassified December 2016 presidential briefing revealing Barack Obama knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a hoax.

Gabbard then made a surprise appearance at White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s weekly press briefing this afternoon.

She WENT OFF on Obama, saying he was criminally implicated. But as she began to lay out the truth of what happened regarding the Russia Collusion hoax and Obama’s involvement, CNN pushed the panic button.

“Multiple intelligence community assessments released in the months leading up to the 2016 election concluded that Russia neither had the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of the US election,” Gabbard started to say before CNN jumped in.

The CNN anchor quickly played down what Gabbard was saying and called her truthful allegation that Obama was guilty of treason “extreme.”

WATCH:

DAMAGE CONTROL? Fake News CNN cuts away just as @DNIGabbard outlines the lengths to which the Obama Administration went to manufacture the Russia collusion hoax pic.twitter.com/qmzx5wQ60d

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 23, 2025

You cannot hate the corporate media enough.

The post Panic: CNN Cuts Away from Tulsi Gabbard Right as Starts Exposing Barack Obama’s Treasonous Actions in Russia Collusion Hoax (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A federal judge on Wednesday denied the Justice Department’s bid to unseal Jeffrey Epstein grand jury transcripts from a Florida investigation.

Florida-based US District Judge Robin Rosenberg, an Obama appointee, said the DOJ failed to justify unsealing the records related to grand juries in West Palm Beach in 2005-2007.

Judge Rosenberg also denied a request to transfer the matter to the Southern District of New York.

Reuters reported:

A U.S. judge on Wednesday denied a U.S. Justice Department bid to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in South Florida, the first ruling in a series of attempts by President Donald Trump’s administration to release more information on the case.

The request stemmed from federal investigations into Epstein in 2005 and 2007, according to court documents. The Justice Department has pending requests to unseal transcripts in Manhattan federal court related to a later indictment brought against Epstein and his former associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg found that the Justice Department’s request in Florida did not fall into any of the exceptions to rules requiring grand jury material be kept secret.

The Justice Department has separately asked New York-based Judge Paul Engelmayer, also an Obama appointee, to unseal grand jury records related to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking cases.

The court documents are related to the 2019 grand jury indictment charging Jeffrey Epstein with sex trafficking offenses and the June 2020 grand jury indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell with numerous offenses related to the trafficking and coercion of minors.

Judge Englemayer made a list of demands in his response to the Justice Department.

Englemayer said he needs more information before he unseals grand jury transcripts.

The post BREAKING: Obama Judge Denies DOJ Bid to Unseal Epstein Docs appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Source: Unleashed.news

What was expected to be the quiet dismissal of Tina Peters’ federal habeas petition — challenging a state court ruling that denied her bond — became one of the most dramatic legal turnarounds in recent memory, as Trump attorney Peter Ticktin and his team delivered a precise, devastating First Amendment argument that stopped the court in its tracks.

The federal court in Colorado — now entertaining jurisdiction under a habeas corpus petition — has formally agreed to receive refined constitutional arguments by this Friday, July 25, focused exclusively on whether Tina Peters is being unlawfully imprisoned for her political speech — a violation of her First Amendment rights that, if confirmed, could result in her immediate release on bond.

Yesterday’s federal hearing was only possible because all remedies in state court had been exhausted, satisfying the procedural requirement for federal jurisdiction. If you weren’t among those listening in to yesterday’s hearing, you missed one of the most strategic and inspiring courtroom performances in recent political history.

Meanwhile, American hero Tina Peters remains in prison after her lawyers asked the state court judge for release while her appeal is pending — a request that was originally denied by Judge Matthew Barrett, who was the trial judge in Colorado state court. Tina Peters’ legal team then appealed that denial to the Colorado Court of Appeals, and they said no as well.

Next, her legal team turned to federal court in Denver, Colorado, seeking a writ of habeas corpus — Latin for “produce the body” — which allows federal judges to review unlawful detentions. The magistrate judge, clear and impartial, reminded all parties that federal jurisdiction requires the petitioner to first exhaust all state-level remedies. In this regard, Peter Ticktin, Tina’s lead counsel, showed the court that the argument of freedom of speech had been made to the court of appeals.

A Strategic Masterclass by Peters’ Legal Team

Yesterday’s hearing was intended to be procedural — a motion by the State of Colorado to dismiss Tina Peters’ limited habeas corpus petition without ever considering the constitutional questions involved. But Peter Ticktin and his legal team were ready.

In a display of timing, discipline, and legal precision, Ticktin played the role of courtroom Columbo — calm, deliberate, and surgical. He dismantled the state’s premise one logical step at a time, making it impossible for the court to ignore what was truly at stake: the imprisonment of an American citizen not for what she did, but for what she might say.

Backing him at every turn was attorney Bob Cynkar, who acted as a brilliant legal tactician — providing timely, well-researched case law and insightful precedent that powerfully reinforced Ticktin’s constitutional arguments. A true legal wizard in the courtroom, Cynkar’s contributions gave the team the edge it needed in a high-stakes hearing.

Judge Barrett’s Words Now Haunt the State

The foundation of yesterday’s breakthrough lies in the very words used by the Colorado judge who sentenced Tina Peters in October 2024.

Judge Matthew Barrett, the trial judge in the Colorado state court, didn’t simply punish her for her conduct. He explicitly cited her ongoing political speech as justification for denying her bond and keeping her in prison — a rationale now under direct constitutional challenge in federal court.

Barrett stated in open court:

“You betrayed your oath for no one other than you. And this is what makes Ms. Peters such a danger to our community.”

He also called her a “charlatan”, and compared the damage of her continued public statements about election fraud to the damage caused by physical violence.

That kind of reasoning — punishing someone for their ideas, predictions, or potential influence — crosses a constitutional line. It touches on predictive harm tied to public communication, and that’s precisely the kind of government action the First Amendment was designed to prohibit.

A Stunning Reversal

Rather than dismiss the case, the federal magistrate has now invited the Peters legal team to submit refined arguments focused squarely on the First Amendment implications of her incarceration.

The court set a firm deadline: Friday, July 25.

If the evidence and arguments show that Tina Peters is being jailed based on speech — not criminal conduct — the court may have no choice but to order her immediate release on bond pending appeal.

It’s a stunning reversal, and one that wouldn’t have happened without the focus, discipline, and legal mastery of her team.

The Tulsi Gabbard Factor: Election Interference Allegations Reinforce Tina’s Case

Adding urgency to yesterday’s developments are recent statements by Tulsi Gabbard, now serving as the Director of National Intelligence, who has publicly alleged that former President Barack Obama was directly involved in election interference in 2016 — and possibly again in 2020.

These allegations give even more weight to Tina Peters’ actions in Mesa County, where she took steps to preserve Dominion Voting System data before it could be wiped during a state-directed software update.

Her intent, now more than ever, appears clear: to follow federal election law, protect the integrity of the records, and raise public awareness of vulnerabilities in the system.

And for that — she’s in prison.

What Happens Now

The court will review the First Amendment filings due this Friday. If it determines that Tina Peters has been held unconstitutionally — retaliated against for her speech — it could trigger a legal finding that justifies her immediate release.

More importantly, the case would continue, with the full weight of constitutional scrutiny applied — something the State of Colorado worked hard to avoid.

But yesterday, the door was reopened.

Stand With Tina Peters

Tina Peters stood up when it mattered. She preserved the evidence. She told the truth. And she refused to stay silent.

Now, she needs our help.

You can support her ongoing legal fight by donating to the American Rights Alliance (ARA) — a qualified 501(c)(3) nonprofit funding this constitutional defense and fighting to protect political prisoners, whistleblowers, and election truth-tellers.

Visit: www.AmericanRightsAlliance.org Or scan the QR code below to contribute directly.

This is no longer just about Tina Peters. It’s about whether Americans still have the right to speak out — and whether the Constitution still protects those who dare.

We live to fight another day. And this time — we’re fighting to win.

The post WE LIVE TO FIGHT ANOTHER DAY: Federal Court Reopens Tina Peters Case After First Amendment Bombshell from Trump Attorney Peter Ticktin and His Team appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

ODNI Tulsi Gabbard made a surprise appearance in the White House press briefing room after she released the second batch of previously undisclosed documents on Wednesday morning that include more proof that Barack Obama directly gave the order to publish Russia Collusion hoax knowing there was no proof to back it up.

Wednesday’s document release followed Friday’s document dump by ODNI Tulsi Gabbard of a declassified December 2016 presidential briefing revealing Barack Obama knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a hoax.

Tulsi went off on Barack Obama for covering up the blackmail Putin had on Hillary Clinton.

“This included possible criminal acts, like secret meetings with multiple organizations. In exchange for supporting secretary Clinton’s campaign for the presidency, significant increases in financing from the state department,” Tulsi told White House reporters.

“They also had documents that showed the patronage of the state department, to state department employees who would support Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign,” Tulsi said.

“There were a high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary’s psycho emotional problems, fits of anger, aggression, cheerfulness, and that secretary Clinton was allegedly on a regiment of heavy tranquilizers,” Tulsi added.

WATCH:

BREAKING: Tulsi Gabbard EXPOSES Obama for COVERING UP the blackmail Putin had on Hillary Clinton, which Putin planned on using after her “likely victory”

Putin had evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS by Hillary, and blatant CORRUPTION.

TIME TO LOCK HILLARY UP TOO!

“This included… pic.twitter.com/wVKlS7K7BQ

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 23, 2025

Tulsi also clarified that Barack Obama was criminally referred.

A reporter asked Tulsi if Obama

WATCH:

HOLY. SMOKES. A political nuke just went off in the White House briefing room.

REPORTER: Are you referring former President Obama to the DOJ for criminal implications?

DNI TULSI GABBARD: “Correct.”

“The evidence we’ve found and released directly point to President Obama… pic.twitter.com/byO3tDNPpw

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 23, 2025

BREAKING…

The post POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE: Tulsi GOES OFF on Barack Obama (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A prominent Midwest city’s experiment with government-run grocery stores shows what awaits Big Apple residents should Marxist New York City Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani get his way.

KSHB 41 did a segment this week on Sun Fresh Market in Kansas City, Missouri, a city-owned store, exposing the disgusting reality of what happens when you let bureaucrats run a valuable private business.

The City of Kansas City owns the Linwood Shopping Center, where the market is located. Community Builders KC, a nonprofit, runs the grocery store.

Kansas City residents shared several complaints about the store, which opened in 2018, while being interviewed by KSHB 41. They revealed there was almost no produce, a disgusting smell emanating from the store, and people leaving right after entering.

“The smell, it’s just ridiculous,” one shopper, Janine Owens, told the outlet.

“I watch people walk in and walk out,” said Pat Clarke, a community advocate.

Owens also expressed bewilderment at why there was no food.

“Where’s the money at?” she complained. “Where’s the produce, where’s the salads… where’s everything at?”

WATCH:

There is even more awful news. Several customers also revealed that the store is being plagued by drug dealing, shoplifting, and vagrancy.

“Customers say they are increasingly afraid to shop there — even with visible police patrols — because of drug dealing, theft, and vagrancy both inside and outside the store and the public library across the street,” the Washington Post reported.

Due to these factors, it’s no wonder Sun Fresh Market is now on the verge of closing despite receiving millions in taxpayer funding.

Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas’s office sent a canned statement in response to KSHB 41’s inquiry regarding whether the city should throw more money at the problem (as if that will work):

“Mayor Lucas and Kansas City remain deeply committed to access to healthy food on the Prospect corridor. The City will work closely with store ownership and all neighborhood stakeholders to support the long-term viability of the store based on normal revenues from customers and area consumers.”

A better idea would be to shut the disgusting store down and use tax incentives to lure private grocery stores to east Kansas City. This would ensure the stocks are full, and Kansas City residents can actually look forward to a clean store.

But this will likely require a change in government leadership first. Will residents be willing to give Republicans or more sane Democrats a chance?

The post This is Socialism: Kansas City Residents Expose the Disturbing and Disgusting Conditions at City-Funded Grocery Store (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.