Here is another view of the Bills event for Charlie.
pic.twitter.com/GN255gIrHo BEAUTIFUL: The Buffalo Bills just held a tribute to Charlie Kirk eight days after he was kiIIed There is NO sign of these tributes slowing down!
The evening sky gets lit up by phone lights at the University of Texas San Antonio Campus, as the crowd chants “USA!” during a memorial held for Charlie Kirk. pic.twitter.com/53nwKncOL4
Victor Reacts: Cancel Culture vs. Consequence Culture (VIDEO)
September 19, 2025
There is a very obvious principle distinction between what the left did with cancel culture and what is happening right now to people like Jimmy Kimmel or those who are celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Conservatives were systematically targeted, deplatformed, and fired from their jobs for the thought crimes of understanding that there are only two genders or that it is wrong to mutilate a child’s body. These are beliefs that until recently had been all but universally understood since our nation’s founding as basic reality.
Those who are currently losing their jobs are not the victims of modern cancel culture. They are experiences the consequences for their actions. No employers want to be associated with someone who is openly celebrating or advocating for political violence and the murder of those who disagree with the left.
For Jimmy Kimmel, lying about the details of a high profile assassination and misleading your TV audience has consequences.
Unfortunately, the truth won’t stop hypocrites on the left from complaining.
CNN’s Brian Stelter is a liar and a hypocrite, but you already knew that. Even so, it’s important to document the most pivotal moments of his stupidity and hypocrisy.
Over the last 24 hours, since it was first reported that ABC had indefinitely suspended Jimmy Kimmel, Brain Stelter has been going on the air and hyperventilating over the news, declaring that this is the end of freedom in America, that this is a threat to free speech.
None of that is true, but what is really important to remember at a time like this, is that Brian Stelter has been trying to silence and censor conservative voices for years.
Brain Stelter’s entire business model, for years, has been to take Media Matters talking points and use them to silence people on the right.
But what if conservatives were executing our own form of cancel culture?
The left made their bed and for years we warned them not to do it. Why would we be expected to feel bad if they have to sleep in the mess that they created?
Keith Olbermann Goes on Shocking Rant: Says Charlie Kirk is Burning ‘in Hell’
September 19, 2025
Keith Olbermann / TikTok
Former ESPN host Keith Olbermann went on a shockingly vile rant on social media following news that the Jimmy Kimmel show was being removed.
The Gateway Pundit reported that ABC broadcast affiliate Nexstar removed Jimmy Kimmel from all 32 of their stations on Wednesday after the late-night host lied about Charlie Kirk’s assassin. Disney also pulled Kimmel’s show.
“Disney is pulling “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” “indefinitely,” the company confirmed to Fox News Digital,” Fox reported.
“Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NXST), today announced that the company’s owned and partner television stations affiliated with the ABC Television Network will preempt “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” for the foreseeable future beginning with tonight’s show. Nexstar strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets,” the statement read.
In a delicious twist of poetic justice, ABC affiliates are set to replace Kimmel’s time slot with a heartfelt special tribute to Kirk.
Sinclair Broadcast Group, the largest ABC affiliate group, shared a statement on X saying that Kimmel’s suspension is not enough and called on the FCC and ABC to take additional action. Sinclair’s ABC stations will air a special in remembrance of Kirk during Kimmel’s spot.
“Mr. Kimmel’s remarks were inappropriate and deeply insensitive at a critical moment for our country,” said Vice Chairman Jason Smith. “We believe broadcasters have a responsibility to educate and elevate respectful, constructive dialogue in our communities. We appreciate FCC Chairman Carr’s remarks today, and this incident highlights the critical need for the FCC to take immediate regulatory action to address control held over local broadcasters by the big national networks.”
Sinclair Says Kimmel Suspension is Not Enough, Calls on FCC and ABC to Take Additional Action
Sinclair’s ABC stations to Air Special in Remembrance of Charlie Kirk During Jimmy Kimmel Live! Friday Timeslot
Sinclair, the nation’s largest ABC affiliate group, objects to recent…
X users lambasted Olbermann, with one user noting, “Our Takeaway: You Want Us To Die. At some point, we have to draw a line. We aren’t cancelling you for the same arbitrary reasons you cancelled us in 2020. We are cancelling you because if we don’t, then you actually will kill us, and the country is going into civil war.”
Hello Mr. Olbermann,
This is going to be a different “Hello” than usual.
I cannot bring myself to do a snarky post, not when you have revealed yourself to have so much hatred in your heart.
Let me try and explain to you in a way that you can accept this, if there is any…
Chicago Store Writes “LOSER” on Cup After Customer Orders Charlie Kirk’s Favorite Drink — Family Demands Accountability as Store SHUTS DOWN Amid Outrage
September 19, 2025
A Starbucks cup from the Chicago location with “Loser :)” written on it after a customer ordered Charlie Kirk’s favorite drink, alongside a screenshot of a store manager.
A Starbucks in Chicago has been forced to temporarily shut down after staff allegedly mocked a senior citizen customer by scrawling “LOSER” across her order, all because she asked for Charlie Kirk’s favorite drink.
On Tuesday, Jacqueline Garretson took to X to expose what happened to her mother-in-law at the Starbucks on Northwest Highway and Harlem Avenue.
“This morning a family member went to Starbucks and ordered Charlie Kirk’s favorite drink — Mint Majesty with honey. When their cup came back, it was marked with the word ‘loser :)’ scribbled across it,” Garretson wrote.
“No customer should ever be mocked or insulted because of what they order or what they believe. This is blatant bias, unprofessional, and unacceptable.”
This morning a family member went to Starbucks and ordered Charlie Kirk’s favorite drink — Mint Majesty with honey.
When their cup came back, it was marked with the word “loser :)” scribbled across it. pic.twitter.com/NHxZjroqCn
Garretson and her husband quickly demanded answers from management.
WATCH:
Quick update from Chicago: My MIL ordered Charlie Kirk’s favorite Starbucks drink (Mint Majesty + honey) — but the cup came back with “Loser” written on it.
The couple immediately confronted the store’s district manager, demanding swift action against the employee responsible.
Jacqueline Garretson: I called in yesterday after this incident happened. I’m sure you’ve heard about it. My mother-in-law came in and ordered a Mint Majesty Tea in honor of Charlie Kirk, and this was written on her cup. I’m sure your phone lines have been ringing off the hook, and they’re going to continue to ring off the hook until something happens about the situation.
Husband: Accountability for sure.
Jacqueline Garretson: So what are we doing with all this?
District Manager: We’re in the process of the investigation, figuring out what happened. The people who were here yesterday—we’re trying to understand. We’re still looking into the situation. We are taking action.
Husband: How long does that take? Because it’s been over 24 hours, and I’m sure the person is here right now.
District Manager: Well, we didn’t know for 24 hours.
Husband: You did. You knew immediately.
Jacqueline Garretson: I called yesterday morning. The manager on duty said they would call me yesterday afternoon. Same with my mother-in-law. I heard nothing.
District Manager: What’s challenging right now is that everybody is calling, saying that they were the one it happened to. So we didn’t know which one was the actual incident.
Jacqueline Garretson: Yeah, it’s us. This is our family member. We just picked up the cup.
Husband: It’s my senior citizen mother—she’s not even political.
Jacqueline Garretson: Yeah, she could not be a more unpolitical person whatsoever. But she has morality. She knows what happened to this man is wrong and wanted to order this because it’s trending on social media.
Jacqueline Garretson: So the fact that she left with this cup, then to find out it has “loser” written all over it—that is disgusting.
District Manager: I understand. I understand. All I can say right now is that we’re looking into it and following up on it. I can’t tell you at this moment what the outcome is going to be, because I don’t even know. At this point, it’s not on my terms. The investigation is ongoing.
Husband: So did you ask any of the employees that are here today if they were here yesterday morning? You know who was here. We’re looking for—not corporate bureaucracy—but immediate accountability.
District Manager: I appreciate that.
Husband: And if not, I will have this whole intersection lined with patriots today. I’m not even joking.
District Manager: I don’t think that you are.
Husband: I’m not. That’s my mother.
District Manager: Like I said, I can’t divulge what is happening in the middle of an investigation. I’m not fully in charge of the line. That’s all I can say. What I can do today is help you get a refund on everything.
Jacqueline Garretson: Yes, please refund her. It doesn’t matter if you’re left or right—what happened is wrong, right? And this adds fuel, putting salt in a wound. It just does. I knew Charlie personally, so you’re adding to that.
Husband: I’ll tell you what—you guys picked the wrong person this time. We’re looking for immediate accountability and action, not just corporate callbacks and investigations. I’m talking 5:00 PM today. I want some form of action taken against the employee who represents this business and wrote “loser” on my mother’s cup.
WATCH:
PART 2: Quick update from Chicago: My MIL ordered Charlie Kirk’s favorite Starbucks drink (Mint Majesty + honey) — but the cup came back with “Loser” written on it. Accountability is key. Video #3 coming shortly. Stay tuned.@MikeDropNews#CharlieKirkpic.twitter.com/dRBba5EZHx
By Wednesday evening, Starbucks had temporarily shut down the Chicago location.
“We asked Starbucks for accountability by 5pm. When we arrived, the store was temporarily closed. Thank you to everyone who has called and stopped into the store over the past 48 hours. We are all Charlie now,” Garretson wrote.
Update 3: We asked Starbucks for accountability by 5pm. When we arrived, the store was temporarily closed. Thank you to everyone who has called and stopped into the store over the past 48 hours. We are all Charlie now. Stay tuned.#CharlieKirk#Accountability#Starbuckspic.twitter.com/G4bcYUFvGb
Despite promises from management, Garretson revealed on Thursday that neither the district manager nor Starbucks corporate had reached out more than 48 hours later.
“48+ hours into #LoserGate and still no call back from the District Manager (even though he promised). Corporate hasn’t reached out either despite multiple attempts. Store is closed, only the drive-thru is open — so I can’t even follow up in person,” she posted.
Part 4: 48+ hours into #LoserGate and still no call back from the District Manager (even though he promised). Corporate hasn’t reached out either despite multiple attempts. Store is closed, only the drive-thru is open — so I can’t even follow up in person. #Accountabilitypic.twitter.com/lNnij2VGWJ
Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron To Present Photographic and Scientific Evidence to the Court To Prove She Is a Woman, While Candace Owens Doubles Down on Claims
September 19, 2025
Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron are suing US journalist Candace Owens in Delaware.
The Brigitte Macron-Candace Owens controversy appears to be far from over.
Reports arose yesterday (18) saying that French president Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte will ‘present photographic and scientific evidence’ to a Delaware court in an effort to prove that the French first lady is a indeed woman.
“The Macrons will present the evidence in a defamation suit they have brought against Candace Owens, the Right-wing ‘Maga’ influencer who has repeatedly insisted that Brigitte Macron is a transgender woman.”
Their lawyer Tom Clare said that Brigitte Macron found Owens’ allegations ‘incredibly upsetting’, and that these claims were a ‘distraction’ to the French president’s career.
“Mr. Clare said on the BBC’s Fame Under Fire podcast: ‘We’re prepared to demonstrate fully, both generically and specifically, that what she’s saying about Brigitte Macron is false. […] It is incredibly upsetting to think that you have to go and subject yourself, to put this type of proof forward’.
‘It is a process that she will have to subject herself to in a very public way. But she’s willing to do it. She is firmly resolved to do what it takes to set the record straight’.”
Back in May, an out-of-control Brigitte slapped her husband in front of the cameras as they arrived in Vietnam for an official visit.
Clare said the powerful couple would supply to the court pictures of Brigitte pregnant and raising her children.
Owens claims that Brigitte was born male with the name Jean-Michel Trogneux who ‘groomed’ Emmanuel as a teenager, before ‘transitioning’ to live as a woman.
Clare also said that the Macrons will testify.
“Mr. Macron said: ‘This is about defending my honor. Because this is nonsense. This is someone who knew full well that she had false information and did so with the aim of causing harm, in the service of an ideology and with established connections to far-Right leaders’.”
Candace Owens. (Wiki Media)
In the meantime, Candace Owens has launched a blistering attack on Brigitte Macron.
In a legal filing Owens argues that the suit is a ‘politically motivated’ attempt to suppress free speech, and that the Macrons attempt to punish her for commentary protected under the First Amendment.
“’In contravention of a sacred precept of U.S. Constitutional Law, the President and First Lady of France… have filed a baseless defamation suit against an independent American journalist who broadcasts a daily news and culture show from her basement in Nashville, Tennessee,’ Owens’ legal team wrote in their response.”
Owens’ attorneys argue that the Macron’s suit is ‘about optics’.
“’The French president and his wife cynically avoided filing their Francocentric case in their home country,’ the filing states. ‘The reason is clear: this matter is not a legitimate legal action, but rather a transparent ruse orchestrated by Plaintiffs’ high-priced public relations firm’.”
In Jult, Brigitte refuses to hold her husband’s hand as they arrive in England.
Owens seeks to dismiss the suit on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, expiration of France’s statute of limitations, and the fact that the jurisdiction that has little or no connection to the dispute.
“Owens’ team has called the strategy ‘quintessential libel tourism’ and says Delaware’s own laws require the application of France’s much shorter three-month statute of limitations on defamation – meaning the claims would already be time-barred.
[…] Owens’ lawyers also argue that continuing litigation in Delaware would place an ‘overwhelming hardship’ on the commentator, who would be forced to spend considerable resources to defend herself in a jurisdiction with ‘no connection to the claims, parties, or operative facts at issue.’
‘There are no relevant witnesses or evidence located in Delaware, nor would any substantive Delaware law apply to a defamation suit brought by the French President and First Lady against an independent Tennessee journalist,’ the filing argues.”
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
. Thank you @BuffaloBills pic.twitter.com/09RtvMTf6h
