Alien CAUGHT Voting Illegally in Federal Elections
September 22, 2025
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement began an enhanced enforcement operation in Chicago Jan. 26, 2025. The operation included officers with the Department of Justice, the FBI, the DEA, the ATF and the U.S. Marshals Service.
A 69-year-old Canadian citizen has been indicted in North Carolina on charges of illegally registering and casting ballots in U.S. federal elections, including the 2024 presidential election.
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Denis Bouchard, a longtime resident of the United States who never obtained citizenship, allegedly lied about his status to secure voter registration in New Hanover and Pender Counties.
Federal prosecutors say he voted in both the 2022 congressional elections and the 2024 presidential election.
WATCH: Jimmy Kimmel Got Paid $16 MILLION Yearly for NOTHING
The indictment alleges that Bouchard falsely certified his citizenship on registration forms in multiple election cycles.
Prosecutors further suggested he may have been casting ballots in North Carolina elections for decades, raising concerns about the vulnerability of voter rolls.
“Every single time a noncitizen casts an illegal vote in North Carolina, it steals and nullifies the vote of an actual citizen,” U.S. Attorney Ellis Boyle said.
“If the records are correct, this Canadian citizen appears to have voted in New Hanover and Pender County elections over the past 20 years.”
Federal charges include two counts of fraud and false statements regarding naturalization, and two counts of willfully defrauding residents of North Carolina by interfering with the integrity of elections.
If convicted, Bouchard faces up to five years in prison for each count.
A 69-year-old Canadian citizen has been indicted in North Carolina for illegally registering and voting in U.S. federal elections—including the 2024 presidential race.
Federal prosecutors say Denis Bouchard, a longtime U.S. resident who never became a citizen, lied about his…
The investigation is being led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation with assistance from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, following a referral from the North Carolina State Board of Elections.
FBI Special Agent in Charge James C. Barnacle Jr. emphasized that protecting election integrity is central to maintaining public trust.
“Every American deserves to exercise their right to vote without interference in the democratic process,” Barnacle said.
Sam Hayes, Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, echoed those remarks.
He noted that his office had flagged the case for federal authorities after conducting a preliminary review.
“Nothing is more critical to our democracy than confidence in our electoral process, which is why vigorous enforcement of our election laws must be a priority,” Hayes said.
The indictment underscores ongoing national concerns about election security and the possibility of noncitizens exploiting loopholes in registration systems.
While election fraud cases remain relatively rare compared to the overall number of ballots cast, prosecutors argue that even a single illegal vote undermines faith in democratic institutions.
Bouchard made his initial court appearance this week. Prosecutors stressed that the charges remain allegations, and he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Charlie Kirk Honored by Hundreds of Thousands for His Christian Values and Patriotism
September 22, 2025
President Donald Trump takes the stage with Erika Kirk at the Memorial Service for Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, Sunday, September 21, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)
Since his assassination, people claiming Charlie Kirk was a racist have been unable to produce a single video where he made a racist comment. However, there are countless videos where he said, “This is the greatest country ever to have existed.”
Charlie Kirk loved Christ, loved his nation, and it is fitting that the massive memorial service held for him on September 21, in Arizona, was both Christian and patriotic.
When the announcer introduced President Trump, “Please welcome the 45th and 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump,” Lee Greenwood’s “I’m Proud to Be an American” played as he took the stage, and the crowd roared.
President Trump began: “Today America is a nation in grief, a nation in shock, a nation in mourning. Less than two weeks ago, our nation was robbed of one of the brightest lights of our time, a giant of his generation. Above all, a devoted husband, father, son, Christian, and patriot, Charles James Kirk, was heinously murdered by a radicalized, cold-blooded monster for speaking the truth that was in his heart.”
“He was violently killed because he spoke for freedom and justice, for God and country, for reason and for common sense. He was assassinated because he lived bravely, he lived boldly, and argued brilliantly without apology. He did what was right for our nation. So, on that day, September 10, 2025, our greatest evangelist for American liberty became immortal. He is a martyr now for American freedom.
“I know I speak for everyone here today when I say that none of us will ever forget Charlie Kirk, and neither now will history.” At this point, the crowd went wild, cheering. “Because while Charlie has been reunited with his Creator in Heaven, his voice will echo through the generations, and his name will live forever in the eternal chronicle of America’s greatest patriots. He will live forever.”
President Trump then turned to Charlie’s widow, Erika Kirk, and praised her. Despite the grief and pain she was feeling, he thanked her for having “found the strength and the deep faith to be a comfort to millions and millions of people.”
He said that America wraps its arms around her, and he vowed that Charlie Kirk will live on and be revered as a great American hero.
To Charlie Kirk’s parents, President Trump offered condolences. He told them that while nothing could take away their pain or bring back their son, they should be proud to know that “their son brought more good and love into this world in his short 31 years than most people, even very, very successful people, can bring in a lifetime.”
He went on to say, “Charlie Kirk loved America with everything he had, and as we can see here, America loved Charlie Kirk.”
Trump reminded the audience that the memorial was not only attended by about 100,000 people inside the stadium but also watched on livestream by millions around the world.
“This is like an old-time revival,” he said. “For millions of Americans, especially young people, it is agonizing and unthinkable to say goodbye to a patriot who still had so much to give.”
He then introduced Vice President JD Vance and Speaker Mike Johnson, joking about how impossible it would be to introduce every top official present because there were so many.
In addition to those dignitaries, the speakers included White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump Jr., and Tucker Carlson.
The national anthem played as President Trump hugged Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s tearful widow.
Taking the microphone, she described the ordeal: “On the night of September 10, I arrived at a Utah hospital to do the unthinkable, to look at my husband’s murdered body.”
Now unanimously chosen to lead Turning Point USA, she offered forgiveness to the alleged shooter and vowed to continue Charlie’s mission of reaching “the lost boys of the West.”
“That young man… I forgive him because it was what Christ did. And it is what Charlie would do. The answer to hate is not hate; the answer is love,” she said, adding the Gospel words: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”
Some people misinterpret Erika Kirk’s public forgiveness of her husband’s killer. It is our Christian duty to forgive those who sin against us, and this is what she was doing.
However, this act of forgiveness should not be confused with condoning the crime or opposing earthly justice. According to both Catholic teaching and mainstream Christian doctrine, human forgiveness operates independently from divine forgiveness and legal accountability.
While Christians are called to forgive unconditionally to purge hatred and revenge from their hearts, this does not mean the perpetrator escapes consequences. Divine forgiveness still requires the killer to genuinely repent and ask God for forgiveness.
Meanwhile, earthly justice must still be pursued – the person must face legal punishment for their crime. Mrs. Kirk’s forgiveness represents the Christian ideal of releasing personal vengeance while still supporting the necessity of legal justice and societal accountability.
Vice President JD Vance said, “I can’t help but think they tried to kill my friend Charlie Kirk, our dear friend, and tonight we speak with Charlie and for Charlie louder than ever.”
He added that Kirk “brought the truth that young people deserve to have a stake in the future,” and praised his example of Christian fatherhood: “Charlie… did so much more than tell the truth. He lived it.”
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth called Charlie Kirk “a warrior for country, a warrior for Christ… He ran the race. He finished the fight.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared, “He made a difference. He mattered, and he will matter now more than he ever has before.”
DNI Tulsi Gabbard praised Kirk as “a warrior for truth and freedom… His words were his weapons. He slayed ignorance. He cut through lies and he woke people’s minds.”
The event blended worship and political rally production on a scale comparable to a state funeral.
Turning Point teams even conducted voter registration on-site. Speakers such as Stephen Miller, Benny Johnson, and Jack Posobiec cast the moment as both a spiritual and political battle, while commentators noted the unprecedented melding of religion, politics, and media.
Elon Musk said Kirk was targeted “because his words made a difference… he was showing people the light and he was killed by the dark.”
Ben Carson urged revival, citing John 12:24: “‘Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone. But if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.’”
Pastor Rob McCoy, Kirk’s longtime spiritual mentor, said he looked at politics as “an on-ramp to Jesus.” Rabbi Pinchas Taylor added that Kirk “defended Israel with clarity and courage.” Cardinal Timothy Dolan predicted his martyrdom would spark a youth revival, calling him “a modern-day St. Paul.”
The service underscored Kirk’s dual identity as activist and evangelist. Hillsdale College announced scholarships and honorary degrees for Charlie and Erika. Attendees chanted “USA” as Trump arrived, while outside a small group of protesters carried hostile signs.
Despite the grief, the tone was one of resolve: “If we’ve learned anything,” a young conservative leader said, “you can kill a man, but you cannot kill a movement.”
Companies Now Must Pay $100,000 to Import High-Skilled Foreign Workers Under Trump’s H-1B Overhaul
September 22, 2025
Credit: @WhiteHouse/X
The Trump administration has slapped U.S. companies with a staggering $100,000 “one-time” fee for each new H-1B visa petition, essentially making it far costlier to hire high-skilled foreign talent.
The change is being pitched by the White House as a necessary measure to protect American workers.
Late Friday, the Trump administration declared a sweeping new requirement: companies that sponsor new H-1B visa applicants must pay a $100,000 fee per petition.
President Donald J. Trump signed a Proclamation to restrict the entry into the United States of certain H-1B aliens as nonimmigrant workers, requiring a $100,000 payment to accompany or supplement H-1B petitions for new applications to curb abuses that displace U.S. workers and undermine national security.
The Proclamation restricts entry for aliens as nonimmigrants to perform services in specialty occupations in the H-1B program unless their petition is accompanied by a $100,000 payment.
It directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to restrict approvals for petitions from aliens that are currently outside the United States that are not accompanied by the payment, and allows case-by-case exemptions if in the national interest.
The Proclamation requires employers to retain documentation of payment remittance, with the Secretary of State verifying payment during the petition process and the Departments of State and Homeland Security denying entry for non-payment for the relevant aliens and taking other relevant steps needed to implement the Proclamation.
It requires the Departments of Labor and Homeland Security to issue joint guidance for verification, enforcement, audits, and penalties.
The Proclamation directs the Secretary of Labor to initiative rulemaking to revise the prevailing wage levels for the H-1B program and directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to initiate rulemaking to prioritize high-skilled, high-paid H-1B workers.
Early communications from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggested the fee might be annual, and that it could affect existing visa holders.
Here’s Sec of Commerce Howard Lutnick yesterday saying Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee is annual, five times in a row.
Over the weekend, the White House issued clarifications: the $100,000 fee applies only to new visa petitions, not renewals or existing visa holders. It is a one-time fee, not an ongoing annual charge. And it takes effect for applications starting in 2026, giving some lead time.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X:
To be clear:
1.) This is NOT an annual fee. It’s a one-time fee that applies only to the petition.
2.) Those who already hold H-1B visas and are currently outside of the country right now will NOT be charged $100,000 to re-enter.
H-1B visa holders can leave and re-enter the country to the same extent as they normally would; whatever ability they have to do that is not impacted by yesterday’s proclamation.
3.) This applies only to new visas, not renewals, and not current visa holders.
It will first apply in the next upcoming lottery cycle.
To be clear:
1.) This is NOT an annual fee. It’s a one-time fee that applies only to the petition.
2.) Those who already hold H-1B visas and are currently outside of the country right now will NOT be charged $100,000 to re-enter.
For decades, the H-1B system has been riddled with fraud, lottery manipulation, and corporate favoritism.
According to the press release:
American workers are being replaced with lower-paid foreign labor, creating an economic and national security threat to the nation.
The share of IT workers with H-1B visas has risen from 32% in FY 2003 to over 65% in recent years.
Unemployment among recent computer science graduates has reached 6.1% and 7.5% for computer engineering graduates — more than double the rates for biology or art history majors. The number of foreign STEM workers in the United States has more than doubled between 2000 and 2019, while overall STEM employment only increased 44.5% during that time.
American companies are laying off their American technology workers and seemingly replacing them with H-1B workers:
One company was approved for 5,189 H-1B workers in FY 2025, while laying off roughly 16,000 U.S. employees this year.
Another company was approved for 1,698 H-1B workers in FY 2025, yet announced it was laying off 2,400 U.S. workers in Oregon in July.
A third company has reduced its U.S. workforce by 27,000 since 2022 while receiving 25,075 H-1B approvals.
Yet another company reportedly cut 1,000 American jobs in February despite receiving 1,137 H-1B approvals for FY 2025.
American IT workers have even been reportedly forced to train their foreign replacements under nondisclosure agreements.
The H-1B program is creating disincentives for future American workers to choose STEM careers, which threatens our national security.
President Trump is imposing higher costs on companies seeking to use the H-1B program in order to address the abuse of the program, stop the undercutting of wages, and protect our national security.
Voters gave President Trump a resounding mandate to put American workers first, and he has worked every day to deliver on that commitment.
President Trump has aggressively and successfully negotiated new trade deals to bring manufacturing jobs back home and attract new investments to the U.S.
President Trump is using tariffs as a strategic tool to rebuild American manufacturing, secure our supply chains, and protect U.S. national security.
President Trump has implemented several Section 232 tariffs to protect manufacturing that has been undermined by unfair trade practices and global excess capacity.
Since President Trump returned to office, all employment gains have gone to American-born workers—unlike last year during the same period under President Biden, when all employment gains went to foreign-born workers.
The Trump Administration issued new guidance to ensure illegal aliens are not allowed access to federal workforce development resources and related grants, protecting job trainings for American workers.
She’s Turning on Everyone: Cackling Kamala Harris to Publish Private Messages Showing Gavin Newsom Snubbed Her Endorsement
September 22, 2025
FCC releases raw ’60 Minutes’ interview with Kamala Harris/Source: FCC screen image
Kamala Harris is now “social distancing” from the Democrat Party—a peculiar strategy Harris will unleash Tuesday, September 23, in the form of her 2024 presidential campaign memoir, 107 Days.
The Gateway Pundit reported that, in excerpts from 107 Days, Harris refers to White House staff as being “hypnotized” during Joe Biden’s ill-fated 2024 presidential run.
“‘It’s Joe and Jill’s decision.’ We all said, like a mantra, as if we’d all been hypnotized. Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness. The stakes were simply too high,” Harris wrote.
Harris further unloaded on Biden for intimidating her during a phone call just before she was defeated by President Trump in a pivotal September 2024 debate. Per Harris, Biden told her:
“My brother called. He’s been talking to a group of real power brokers in Philly.”
Harris continued:
“His brother told him that those guys were not going to support me because I’d been saying bad things about him… [He] made it all about himself, distracting me with worry about hostile power-brokers in the biggest city of the most important state.”
In 107 Days, Harris also confesses that she lied to the American people regarding Biden’s failing health, and she demeans her running mate Tim Walz, along with Pete Buttigieg and Gavin Newsom.
Harris grotesquely implies she only selected Tim Walz as her running mate over Pete Buttigieg because Walz was a “straight white man.”
“[Buttigieg] would have been an ideal partner—if he were a straight white man,” Harris wrote. “But we were already asking a lot of America: to accept a Black woman, married to a Jewish man.”
Inadvertently, Harris’s comment underscores everything rotten about identity politics. By outwardly assuming elections can be swayed by the homophobia of swing state voters, Harris herself commits the truly homophobic act of denying Buttigieg, against her better judgment—only later to insult Buttigieg, Walz, gay Americans, and everyday Americans.
As Harris today implements her shocking scorched-earth political strategy against the Democrat Party, Real Clear Politics finds her polling 16 points below Gavin Newsom for the 2028 Democrat Party presidential nomination.
Hilariously, a new Politico report reveals that, according to 107 Days, Gavin Newsom brushed off Harris’s immediate request for an endorsement with the words: “Hiking. Will call back.”
Letitia James Indictment: Here’s the Prosecution Memorandum for Federal and State Charges
September 22, 2025
A Prosecution Memorandum is an internal legal document prepared by prosecutors that summarizes the facts, law, and reasoning supporting (or recommending against) bringing criminal charges.
It is not filed in court, rather it’s an internal document the prosecutors use to guide decision-making. Below is a mock Prosecution Memorandum that could easily be used to consider charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James.
PROSECUTION MEMORANDUM
Re: United States v. Letitia James
Prepared for: Eastern District of Virginia, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York and Special Prosecutor’s Office
Date: September 21, 2025
I. Introduction
This memorandum addresses potential federal, Commonwealth of Virginia, and New York State charges against Letitia James, Attorney General of New York, arising out of an alleged 43-year pattern of mortgage-related fraud and false filings. The investigative reporting of Joel Gilbert (The Gateway Pundit), as well as Sam Antar (White Collar Fraud), provides documentary evidence and witness analysis suggesting that James repeatedly misrepresented the legal status of her properties, particularly a five-unit apartment building at 296 Lafayette Avenue in Brooklyn, as well as a residential home in Norfolk, Virginia in order to obtain loans and preferential loan terms she was not entitled to. James also is harboring a wanted fugitive in the Virginia home.
If corroborated, these acts constitute violations of both federal statutes (bank fraud, false statements to financial institutions, wire fraud, RICO) and New York State statutes (residential mortgage fraud, offering false instruments for filing, scheme to defraud, enterprise corruption).
II. Factual Background
A. Early Fraud (1983)
Letitia James and her father, Robert James, obtained a mortgage on a Queens property by falsely identifying themselves as “husband and wife.”
Motivation: to enhance creditworthiness and secure a loan Letitia James could not have qualified for alone at age 24 based on her work and income.
B. Brooklyn Apartment Building (2001–2019) James purchased 296 Lafayette Avenue (legally a five-family dwelling) in 2001.
On at least four separate mortgage and refinance applications (2001, 2004, 2011, 2019), James declared the property had four units, and not five, in order to obtain more favorable terms. This misrepresentation:
– Qualified James for lower residential mortgage rates, closing costs, and taxes.
– Allowed avoidance of higher commercial mortgage rates, closing costs, and taxes.
– Enabled receipt of a 2011 US Government HAMP loan, restricted to 1-4 family dwellings, at 2.7% interest (saving approx. $44,000 annually) over her 10% adjustable rate loan. James also swore a financial hardship to qualify for this loan, despite earnings of around $ 14,000 per month.
C. 2021 Citizens Bank Credit Line Mortgage
James signed a $200,000 credit line mortgage with Citizens Bank.
In mortgage documents, James described this property as “1 family dwelling”, contrary to its legal designation on her 2001 Certificate of Occupancy (five dwelling units).
Result: James avoided $20,000-$30,000 in commercial loan closing costs, appraisal fees, and higher interest rates.
D. Virginia Property Misstatements (2023)
James allegedly designated a Norfolk, Virginia residence as her “primary residence” on mortgage filings.
This misrepresentation materially altered underwriting, insurance rates, and loan terms to lower costs and rates than James was entitled to had she admitted her primary residence was in Brooklyn, NY.
E. Harboring a Fugitive (2025)
In her Virginia home, Letitia James allegedly provides shelter for her niece, a convicted fugitive and Absconder with an active warrant for arrest in North Carolina.
Legal Significance: Harboring a fugitive is illegal. This allegation also bolsters the RICO and enterprise corruption claims by showing an ongoing pattern of unlawful activity. It demonstrates James’s willingness to obstruct justice, further establishing continuity of corrupt intent.
III. Applicable Federal Law
18 U.S.C. § 1014 – False Statements to Financial Institutions – Each false mortgage application (2001–2021) constitutes a violation. – 2021 Citizens Bank filing actionable until June 2026. – Penalty: up to 30 years per count.
18 U.S.C. § 1344 – Bank Fraud – Pattern of obtaining loans by materially false pretenses. – Predicate acts include misrepresentations of unit counts and residency. – Penalty: up to 30 years.
18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 & 1343 – Mail and Wire Fraud – Transmission of false loan applications through mail/electronic systems. – Penalty: up to 20 years per count.
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968 – RICO – “Pattern of racketeering activity” demonstrated by multiple bank/wire fraud acts within 10 years. – Enterprise: ongoing ownership/financing of 296 Lafayette Avenue. – Penalty: up to 20 years (or life if underlying penalties apply).
18 U.S.C. § 1071
“Harboring a Fugitive” is an act of knowingly harboring or concealing a person in order to prevent their discovery or arrest.
– Penalty: up to five years imprisonment.
IV. Applicable Commonwealth of Virginia Law
Penal Law § 18.2-472– Harboring a Fugitive
– Harboring in Virginia makes someone an accessory after the fact, a Class 1 misdemeanor
– Penalty: Up to 12 months jail and a $2,500 fine.
Penal Law 18.2-186. False statements to obtain property or credit
– Making a materially false statement in writing with intent that it be relied on in order to procure a loan or credit is grand larceny, a felony.
– Penalty: Imprisonment of 1 to 20 years.
V. Applicable New York State Law
Penal Law § 187.20 – Residential Mortgage Fraud, Second Degree – Fraud over $50,000; Class C felony, 15-year max. – Applies to 2011 HAMP loan, 2019 refinance, 2021 Citizens Bank credit line.
Penal Law § 175.35 – Offering a False Instrument for Filing (First Degree) – False mortgages recorded with Kings County Clerk. – Each document a separate Class E felony (up to 4 years).
Penal Law § 190.65 – Scheme to Defraud (First Degree) – Systematic misrepresentations to multiple financial institutions over two decades. – Class E felony (up to 4 years).
Penal Law § 460.20 – Enterprise Corruption – New York’s “mini-RICO.” – 20+ years of fraudulent acts in furtherance of an enterprise (property ownership/financing). – Class B felony, 25-year max.
VI. Pattern and Continuity
Courts require more than isolated misconduct to sustain RICO or enterprise charges. Here, however, Letitia James’s illegal acts span:
– 1983 (father mortgage misrepresentation).
– 2001–2019 (multiple false filings on 296 Lafayette).
– 2011 (fraudulent HAMP application “4-family dwelling”).
– 2021 (Citizens Bank “1-family dwelling” claim).
– 2023 (Virginia primary residence misrepresentation).
This timeline demonstrates continuity and persistence – a defining hallmark of enterprise-based fraud. Older acts, though time-barred, remain admissible as background evidence and to prove intent.
VII. Potential Defenses
Statute of Limitations – Conduct prior to 2015 may be time-barred. However, 2019 and 2021 filings are within federal 10-year and state 5-year limits.
No Financial Harm – Defendant may argue banks were repaid.
Counter: James herself argued in the Trump case that fraud exists regardless of bank losses, and any misstatement is a grave crime.
Clerical Error Defense – Possible claim of “mistaken unit counts.”
Counter: consistency of false statements across decades undermines inadvertence.
No Intent – Possible claim of “Didn’t know the laws”.
Counter: James was an attorney very familiar with real estate law given her many public statements in support of tenants and homeowners, and the legal actions of her office suing real estate companies to enforce New York real estate law over years. She knew the law.
Rarity of Prosecutions – Rarity of prosecution has no legal weight.
Political Retribution – Retaliation claims are nearly impossible to prove without hard evidence of discriminatory targeting.
VIII. Trial Strategy
Documentary Evidence: Public documents, Mortgage applications, Certificates of Occupancy, ACRIS filings (Brooklyn), Insurance documents.
Expert Witnesses: Investigator Joel Gilbert, Forensic Accountant Sam Antar, mortgage underwriters, former bank officers.
Pattern Proof: Demonstrate James’s long-running scheme, contrast with her public statements that “no one is above the law.”
Jury Appeal: Leverage hypocrisy – prosecutor of Trump accused of the same frauds she claimed were per se illegal.
VIII. Conclusion
Based on the evidence, there is a strong basis for prosecution under both federal and New York law. The most compelling charges are:
– Federal: False Statements to Financial Institutions (§ 1014), Bank Fraud (§ 1344), RICO (§ 1962), Harboring a Fugitive
– State: Residential Mortgage Fraud (§ 187.20), Offering a False Instrument (§ 175.35), Enterprise Corruption (§ 460.20).
There exists more than a sufficient basis to proceed with charges, ensuring that the maxim that “no one is above the law”.
The evidence presented in this Prosecution Memorandum demonstrates a consistent pattern of misrepresentation and fraud spanning more than four decades by Letitia James. James’s actions reveal a deliberate scheme to exploit mortgage classifications, interest rates, and government programs, resulting in substantial personal benefit at the expense of both lenders and the integrity of the financial system.
From the early loan obtained under false pretenses in 1983, to the repeated understatement of unit counts at 296 Lafayette Avenue, to the more recent Citizens Bank credit line and Virginia residence misrepresentations, and the harboring of a fugitive, the evidence establishes continuity and intent for illicit financial gain. Such conduct, if proven in court, squarely meets the elements of both federal bank fraud statutes and New York’s parallel enterprise corruption laws.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.