“They Will Not Be Coming Back”: An Iranian in America Describes a Regime’s War on Its People

“They Will Not Be Coming Back”: An Iranian in America Describes a Regime’s War on Its People

“They Will Not Be Coming Back”: An Iranian in America Describes a Regime’s War on Its People
January 19, 2026

Protesters gather in the street holding an Iranian flag during a demonstration in an urban area.
Protesters wave the Iranian flag with the Islamic emblem cut out. By راننده از تهران – own work, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Eager to talk about the anti-regime protests, fifty-three-year-old Reza said, “The government doesn’t care.” He escaped Iran 15 years ago and now drives Uber in Washington, D.C., while closely monitoring the ongoing violence and the protesters’ deaths, which have affected him deeply.

“They don’t care about people’s age. Two years old or 100 years old, anyone who comes out to protest, they kill the people.” He shook his head in distress. “That’s not right, that’s not right,” he repeated.

Reza arrived in the United States in 2014 and, several years later, in 2021, became an American citizen. His family was not so lucky. Four members of his family died under suspicious circumstances during the Covid pandemic, and Reza believes the regime killed them.

He still has one sister and two brothers in Iran, but communication with them has become nearly impossible because the government has shut down not only the internet but even home phones since the protests began on December 28, 2025.

When asked about Iranian sentiment toward the Ayatollah, Reza’s response was immediate. “I’m so sorry about that,” he said, struggling to find words strong enough.

He estimates that the regime has killed approximately 100,000 people during recent crackdowns, a figure he believes with absolute certainty.

Human rights organizations have estimated the death toll to be between 3,500 and 5,000 people. Monitoring has been difficult because of internet and phone blackouts, and the true number is likely higher.

A report by doctors on the ground estimates that at least 16,500 protesters have been killed and more than 330,000 injured, with most victims reportedly under the age of 30.

Hospital records from multiple provinces show extensive use of lethal force, including gunshot and shrapnel wounds to the head, neck, and chest, suggesting civilians were targeted with military-grade weapons.

Eye surgeons have reported an estimated 700 to 1,000 people losing an eye, including roughly 7,000 eye injury cases recorded at a single hospital in Tehran.

Doctors further reported fatalities linked to blood shortages, saying some medical staff donated their own blood, while security forces allegedly blocked blood transfusions in certain hospitals, contributing to additional deaths.

At the same time, Reza’s claim of 100,000 deaths appears to be driven more by emotion than evidence. However, Reza said he had seen previous protests and knew the regime lies.

Regarding the more than 24,000 protesters who had been jailed, “And after, they will not be coming back,” he said. “They do not kill them in protest,” he added, drawing a hand across his throat. “They will kill in jail.” According to Iranian resistance media, between January 5 and 15 the regime executed at least 127 prisoners.

He described scenes of workers picking up bodies with their bare hands and loading them onto trucks to be dumped somewhere out of sight.

Those who are not shot will be tortured. “They gonna take out the nail, they gonna cut in the finger, they gonna cut in the legs, you know. They not gonna do one time kill the people with gun.”

The fundamental difference between America and Iran, Reza explained, is freedom, particularly the freedom to dissent without being killed. “In American, if we don’t want a government, no one gonna kill us,” he said. In America, citizens can protest, can question their government. “But Iran, it’s not like that. They just take out the gun, kill the people, and then people don’t have a gun.”

If Iranians were armed like Americans, Reza believes the regime would fall. “If Iranian people have gun, you believe me, ten Iranian people have a gun, they can kill 2,000 army,” he insisted.

The day before our conversation, Reza had driven to Washington, D.C. to join a protest supporting the Iranian people. He was encouraged by the turnout, not just Iranian expatriates, but many Americans who came to stand in solidarity. “A lot of Iranian people and then American people came to help Iranian people,” he said with gratitude.

Despite 15 years in exile and a decade in America, Reza cannot disconnect from Iran’s suffering. He said that since the protests began he has greatly cut down his working hours, spending much of his time searching for news and worrying about his siblings and his birth nation.

“The protests already stopped because the government doesn’t care,” he said sadly. He explained that once protesters realized they would simply be mowed down with no hope of bringing about regime change, they gave up.

“That’s not right,” Reza repeated throughout our conversation, a simple phrase that encapsulated everything that was wrong with the way the Iranian regime has abused its own population.

The post “They Will Not Be Coming Back”: An Iranian in America Describes a Regime’s War on Its People appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Antonio Graceffo

Psychologist Explains the Left’s ICE DERANGEMENT Syndrome

Psychologist Explains the Left’s ICE DERANGEMENT Syndrome
January 19, 2026

Protesters hold signs demanding the removal of ICE during a rally, with one sign reading "I thought all lives," highlighting immigration reform activism.

LISTEN: Interview with Dr. Norman Fried, psychologist & professor, HERE

The American left no longer treats immigration enforcement as a policy question. Instead,  enforcement itself is treated as a moral crime. That shift has produced what can only be described as ICE derangement syndrome—a pattern of hysteria, distortion, and dehumanization aimed at federal agents carrying out the law. 

Dr. Norman Fried, a clinical psychologist who specializes in trauma and behavior, explained how this mindset forms and why it is becoming more dangerous.

ICE exists for a simple reason: to enforce immigration law and remove individuals who have no legal right to remain in the country, particularly criminals. That mission did not suddenly become controversial. What changed was the political incentive structure. 

The left learned that demonizing ICE generates outrage, donations, social media engagement, and ideological loyalty. Facts became optional, and the Left began acting on emotion.

Dr. Fried described how group psychology replaces individual moral reasoning. People stop evaluating claims independently and instead adopt whatever narrative their political environment promotes. 

Within that sphere, exaggeration is rewarded. ICE agents are no longer officers enforcing statutes; they are recast as “terrorists,” “fascists,” or “kidnappers.” Once that framing takes hold, confrontation feels justified and even heroic.

The consequences are real, and tragic. Demonization erodes trust in law enforcement, encourages resistance to lawful orders, and increases the likelihood of violence. 

When activists are told that ICE represents an evil regime rather than a legal authority, they feel morally licensed to obstruct, harass, or attack agents. 

The irony is that the left’s narrative ignores who actually benefits from weakened enforcement. It is not families seeking opportunity. Rather, it is cartels, traffickers, and repeat offenders who exploit chaos. A border without consequences is not compassionate; it is predatory. 

Trump understands that reality. Deterrence works because it disrupts criminal incentives. Enforcement saves lives by restoring order.

Dr. Fried emphasized that movements driven by emotion rather than fact tend to escalate. 

Each claim must be more extreme than the last to maintain attention and cohesion. That is why “ICE is bad” turned into “ICE is evil,” which turned into “ICE must be abolished.” 

There is no limiting principle once reality is replaced by feeling.

ICE derangement syndrome is really about control—control over narrative, over language, and over who is allowed to speak. 

A country that cannot enforce its laws cannot protect its people. Demonizing the agents tasked with enforcement only makes our society more dangerous.

Read more on why the Left demonizes ICE here.

The post Psychologist Explains the Left’s ICE DERANGEMENT Syndrome appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Gregory Lyakhov

Don Lemon Gets Spanked When He Speaks Out and Invents a Disgusting Lie for His Actions During Leftist Riot In a St. Paul Church (VIDEO)

Don Lemon Gets Spanked When He Speaks Out and Invents a Disgusting Lie for His Actions During Leftist Riot In a St. Paul Church (VIDEO)

Don Lemon Gets Spanked When He Speaks Out and Invents a Disgusting Lie for His Actions During Leftist Riot In a St. Paul Church (VIDEO)
January 19, 2026

Don Lemon speaks out after helping lead a leftist riot in a St. Paul church nd allegedly committing multiple crimes in the process. Credit: X/Screenshot

Failed CNN journalist Don Lemon should have just kept his mouth shut after deciding to invent an outrageous lie over his wicked and illegal anti-Christian actions last night in St. Paul, Minnesota.

As previously reported, radical anti-ICE agitators stormed Cities Church, interrupting Christians in the middle of worship.

Instead of condemning the mob’s conduct or defending the constitutional right to religious assembly, Lemon inserted himself into the chaos—live-streaming the scene and aggressively confronting congregants who were already shaken by the intrusion.

This is the beginning of what’s going to happen here,” Lemon said as anti-ICE protestors shouted down the pastor and harassed parishioners.

“They’ve stopped the service — a lot of people, a number of people have left,” Lemon said.

Lemon later rushed to the church altar and tried to lecture a pastor about the First Amendment. This just further incited the wicked mob of demons.

As TGP readers know, the First Amendment DOES NOT protect against unlawful assembly, which is what this riot was.

Harmeet Dhillon, the Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, confirmed the Justice Department is investigating the anti-ICE protestors.

“The Civil Rights division is investigating the potential violations of the federal FACE Act by these people desecrating a house of worship and interfering with Christian worshippers,” Dhillon said in response to the video.

She also confirmed Lemon was under investigation as well.

Lemon spoke out about the incident and the idea that he could face prosecution for his criminal acts.

He falsely claimed he was merely performing journalistic work and denied any affiliation with the organization involved. On top of that, he forgot Dhillon’s name.

“The Administration and the Fake News MAGAS are losing their mind over something that is not even true,” Lemon said. “Let me just make it clear, um, Assistant Attorney General, what’s her name, Gillian, whatever.”

“I have no affiliation to that organization,” he continued. ” I didn’t even know they were going to this church until we followed them there.”

“We were there chronicling protests. Once the protest started, we did an act of journalism.”

What a disgusting lie and an insult to real reporters.

WATCH:

Lemon continued to claim his innocence while proceeding to point the finger at someone else.

“It’s called journalism…First Amendment, all that stuff…So why don’t you talk to the actual person who is in charge of the organization and whose idea it was to have the protests at the church before you start blaming me for which you have no idea.”

X users were not buying his garbage, however. They noted he committed a variety of crimes, including violating the FACE Act, by unlawfully entering a house of worship and seeking to stop their exercise of free expression.

Many also pointed out that he bullied a pastor during church hours.

Moreover, as Grok notes, ‘journalists’ like Lemon can be criminally liable for unlawful entry, even in the pursuit of a story.

The post Don Lemon Gets Spanked When He Speaks Out and Invents a Disgusting Lie for His Actions During Leftist Riot In a St. Paul Church (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cullen Linebarger

NO SHAME: Don Lemon Lectures Pastor on First Amendment After Far-Left Agitators Harass Christians and Shut Down Worship

NO SHAME: Don Lemon Lectures Pastor on First Amendment After Far-Left Agitators Harass Christians and Shut Down Worship

NO SHAME: Don Lemon Lectures Pastor on First Amendment After Far-Left Agitators Harass Christians and Shut Down Worship
January 19, 2026

Two men engaged in conversation inside a church, with musical instruments visible in the background and stained glass windows illuminating the space.

Don Lemon attempted to lecture a Christian pastor on the First Amendment after a mob of far-left agitators stormed a church in Minneapolis, disrupting a worship service and intimidating congregants.

The confrontation unfolded as Lemon confronted Pastor Jonathan Parnell, whose congregation had just endured harassment and interruption while gathered for prayer and worship.

Lemon attempted to lecture the pastor on the First Amendment, bizarrely invoking “freedom of speech” and “freedom of assembly” to justify the mob’s actions inside a church sanctuary.

When asked about the incident, Pastor Parnell did not mince words.

“This is unacceptable. It’s shameful,” he said. “It’s shameful to interrupt a public gathering of Christians in worship.”

As Lemon attempted to interrupt, the pastor made clear where his priorities lay.

“I have to take care of my flock, my family.”

That didn’t stop Lemon from pressing forward with a condescending civics lecture.

“Listen, we live in a… There’s a Constitution,” Lemon said, invoking the First Amendment to justify the agitators’ actions.

“The First Amendment to freedom of speech and freedom to assemble and protect.”

But Parnell calmly and firmly pushed back:

“We’re here to worship. We’re here to worship Jesus because that’s the hope of these cities. That’s the hope of the world is Jesus Christ.”

Rather than respect that boundary, Lemon pressed further, suggesting that Jesus would “understand” the agitators who shut down the service.

Don Lemon:
“Don’t you think Jesus would be understanding and love these folks?”

Pastor Parnell refused to play along with the media spin.

“We’re about spreading the love of Jesus,” he said.
“I have to take care of my church and my family, so I ask that you would also leave this building.”

WATCH:

The post NO SHAME: Don Lemon Lectures Pastor on First Amendment After Far-Left Agitators Harass Christians and Shut Down Worship appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft

Insurrection Act and Possible Dueling Troop Deployments in Minnesota

Insurrection Act and Possible Dueling Troop Deployments in Minnesota

Insurrection Act and Possible Dueling Troop Deployments in Minnesota
January 19, 2026

Military personnel in tactical gear stand in formation with shields and an armored vehicle during a public demonstration.
Minnesota National Guard. Photo by Sgt. Sebastian Nemec, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Governor Tim Walz is mobilizing the Minnesota National Guard, while President Trump has ordered active-duty soldiers to stand by, creating a potential standoff between state and federal forces. President Trump has threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act if Walz fails to stop attacks on ICE agents, while the Justice Department investigates Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for encouraging obstruction of federal law enforcement.

As of January 18, 2026, Governor Walz has mobilized roughly 1,500 soldiers who are staged and ready, though they have not been deployed to city streets. The official framing describes them as ready to support local and state law enforcement in protecting critical infrastructure and maintaining public safety. Walz stated, likely referring to his conflict with President Trump, “Minnesota will not allow our community to be used as a prop in a national political fight.”

When asked directly if the National Guard would be deployed against federal agents, Walz did not answer directly. He said, “Whatever it is: if it’s an act of nature, if it’s a global pandemic, or in this case, if it is a rogue federal agent.” He added, “To Minnesotans, on the National Guard, they’re there to protect you and protect your constitutional rights.”

The Pentagon has ordered approximately 1,500 active-duty soldiers from the 11th Airborne Division in Alaska to prepare for possible deployment to Minnesota, though no deployment has occurred yet. President Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act on January 15, 2026, but has not done so.

On Truth Social, Trump stated: “If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT.” If invoked, the Insurrection Act would allow Trump to deploy active-duty military for law enforcement, federalize the National Guard without state consent, and override Posse Comitatus Act restrictions. The act was last invoked in 1992 during the Los Angeles riots.

Walz has made several statements encouraging citizens to monitor and document ICE operations. On December 18, 2025, before the first shooting, he said he would “rely on observers, regular people expressing their First Amendment rights, to keep a watch on ICE.” On January 14, 2026, Walz stated in a video address: “You have an absolute right to peacefully film ICE agents as they conduct these activities. So carry your phone with you at all times. And if you see these ICE agents in your neighborhood, take out that phone and hit record.” He added: “Help us create a database of atrocities against Minnesotans, not just to establish a record for posterity, but to bank evidence for future prosecution.”

The use of the word “atrocities” presupposes war crimes or crimes against humanity, implying systematic and morally heinous acts comparable to genocide, mass murder, or torture. What occurred, however, were ICE agents conducting lawful immigration enforcement operations. The January 7 shooting involved an ICE agent shooting Renee Good in self-defense. The January 14 incident involved a Venezuelan man who violently resisted arrest while others attacked the officer with a snow shovel and broom handle. Neither incident qualifies as an atrocity.

Walz’s language legitimizes violence against ICE by framing their actions as atrocities, against which resistance can be portrayed as morally justified self-defense. By encouraging documentation as a means of building a criminal case, he promotes obstruction and inflames tensions when his stated goal is public safety. The federal government has clear legal authority to enforce immigration law: illegal aliens are unlawfully present, ICE has lawful authority to detain and deport, and states cannot nullify federal immigration law under Arizona v. United States (2012).

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey stated on December 18, 2025, that the city was “coordinating with the American Civil Liberties Union” and working with police to monitor federal activity using body cameras. On January 8, 2026, Frey encouraged protesters but warned them to “stop taking the bait” from ICE officers if confrontations arose, saying, “You are not helping the undocumented immigrants in our city.” Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison created an online portal for protesters to submit videos, stating, “My team and I will use these stories and experiences to assist in our ongoing fight to end the federal surge in Minnesota.”

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem stated on January 16, 2026: “Mayor Frey and Governor Walz have to get their city under control. They are encouraging impeding and assault against our law enforcement, which is a federal crime, a felony.” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said: “When the governor or the mayor threaten our officers, when the mayor suggests that he’s encouraging citizens to call 911 when they see ICE officers, that is very close to a federal crime.”

The Department of Justice is investigating Walz and Frey for alleged conspiracy to impede federal immigration agents based on their public statements. Subpoenas are expected, though legal experts suggest the investigation has a weak legal foundation. The DOJ probe examines potential violations of 18 U.S.C. § 372, which makes it a crime for two or more people to conspire to prevent federal officers from carrying out their duties through force, intimidation, or threats. The legal dispute centers on whether Walz’s and Frey’s encouragement to film and document ICE constitutes legitimate First Amendment activity or encouragement of obstruction of federal law enforcement.

On January 17, 2026, a federal judge prohibited federal agents from arresting, detaining, retaliating against, or using force against protesters engaged in “unobstructive protest activity, including observing the activities of Operation Metro Surge,” affirming the right to monitor ICE. However, officers have not been arresting people for unobstructive activity; arrests have involved individuals who attacked or interfered with ICE agents.

If Trump and Walz both move forward with mobilizing their respective military forces, Trump still prevails. Under the constitutional framework, the president, as commander in chief, has authority over the National Guard under Title 10, while governors exercise authority under Title 32 for state active duty. Federal authority supersedes state authority under the Supremacy Clause, allowing Trump to federalize the Minnesota National Guard if necessary. In any scenario, attempting to use the National Guard to interfere with federal law enforcement would be legally problematic for Walz.

The post Insurrection Act and Possible Dueling Troop Deployments in Minnesota appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Antonio Graceffo