Former CNN host Don Lemon suffered a public meltdown after a calm, articulate churchgoer dismantled Lemon’s gaslighting narrative following a far-left disruption of a Minnesota worship service.

As previously reported, radical anti-ICE agitators stormed Cities Church, interrupting Christians in the middle of worship.

Instead of condemning the mob’s conduct or defending the constitutional right to religious assembly, Lemon inserted himself into the chaos—live-streaming the scene and aggressively confronting congregants who were already shaken by the intrusion.

One churchgoer delivered a sober assessment:

“These people have come into our house, and they’ve interrupted our worship. This is a house of peace, and we try to proclaim that. This stirs division and rancor. In the end, it’s not helpful. Ultimately, I believe they’ve lost.

They’ve emptied a house of worship. Everybody’s gone home. Their point has been proven worthless. In the end, I think they lose. But more importantly, if I were to walk into any of their houses uninvited and cause derision and upset according to their values, I would ultimately be kicked out. It’s not a good way. I feel violated. I feel interrupted. I feel angry.”

The man explained, in plain terms, why the protest crossed a moral and civic line, comparing it to barging uninvited into someone’s private home to cause disruption. He described feeling violated, interrupted, and angry.

Rather than engage respectfully, Lemon attempted to pivot the conversation into a rehearsed talking point about ICE enforcement, claiming warrantless raids, mass detentions of citizens, and a lack of criminality among those apprehended. When the churchgoer contextualized enforcement as a corrective response to years of border chaos, Lemon grew visibly agitated.

The exchange escalated when Lemon repeatedly interrupted, insisted on his own authority, and chased the man as he attempted to disengage.

WATCH:

Transcript:

Don Lemon
Can I ask you something? When you were saying if you had showed up at their house, they’re saying that people are showing up at houses where there are citizens without due process—breaking and entering the house. One that we saw, I’ve been watching from New York, involved a battering ram into someone’s private property, and there’s no recourse. You understand what I’m saying?

Churchgoer
This is all part of a much larger dialogue, in my opinion. On one side are people who watched a previous administration bring 12 million people in over the course of four years—many of them undocumented, many of them criminals, etc. This is another administration’s corrective. Now, whether you agree with the policies or procedures, I think I could actually be sympathetic to some of the concerns where there have been challenges to question and dissent. At the same time, these are what are called targeted interventions by ICE to keep the American people safe.

Don Lemon
If I may respectfully interject here, I’ve been out reporting on a lot of these, and they’re not targeted. There are no warrants signed by a judge. Let me finish. They’re American citizens, many of them. Most of the people they detain don’t have criminal convictions or criminal records.

Churchgoer
I’m not going to get into the weeds.

Don Lemon
You should know that, though. Don’t you think that’s part of it?

Churchgoer
Yes. I could also show you many opposing cases where we’re picking up very real criminals who have put Americans in danger. I’m not saying it’s pretty. I’m not saying it’s not messy. I’m not saying it couldn’t be better. I’m saying this is part of a much larger dialogue in which one administration caused a great deal of chaos, havoc, and danger for American citizens, and another is trying to correct that.

Don Lemon
Do you believe that? Honestly…

Churchgoer
Listen, you’re not a journalist.

Don Lemon
Yes, I am. I want to give you the facts.

Churchgoer
No. No, no, no.

Don Lemon
Did you know that undocumented people and immigrants commit far less crime than American citizens?

Churchgoer
We’re done here.

Don Lemon
Than natural-born American citizens. You won’t listen. I’m giving you the facts.

Churchgoer
You did not have facts.

Don Lemon
He doesn’t want to listen to facts. That’s the interesting thing about this—that they won’t listen to facts.

Churchgoer
No, no, no.

Don Lemon
You shouldn’t hear the facts?

Churchgoer
Of course I should hear the facts. But will you give me the facts on both sides?

Don Lemon
That is the facts on both sides.

The post Don Lemon Loses It After Smarter Man Shuts Down His Gaslighting at Minnesota Church Stormed by Far-Left Agitators appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A full-blown assault on Christian worship unfolded Sunday morning in Minnesota as a radical anti-ICE mob stormed a church service, shut down prayer, and harassed parishioners while disgraced former CNN host Don Lemon live-streamed the chaos.

The mob descended on the sanctuary because the church’s pastor reportedly also serves as a field director with ICE.

Lemon telegraphed his stunt the day before, boasting on Instagram that he was headed to Minnesota to “report on ICE” and urging followers to tune in to his live broadcast.

On Sunday, cameras rolled as agitators shouted down the pastor, disrupted prayer, and scattered congregants.

“This is the beginning of what’s going to happen here,” Lemon said on his stream as the service was derailed. Moments later, he admitted the obvious: “They’ve stopped the service—a lot of people have left.”

This wasn’t reporting. It was participation.

Far-left activist Nekima Levy Armstrong publicly praised the disruption on social media, thanking a roster of agitators and media allies—including Lemon, while declaring “judgment” had come to the “House of God.” The post reads like a victory lap over silencing Christian worship.

The disruption has now triggered a full federal investigation.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced on X:

“President Trump will not tolerate the intimidation and harassment of Christians in their sacred places of worship. The Department of Justice has launched a full investigation into the despicable incident that took place earlier today at a church in Minnesota.”

Attorney Harmeet Dhillon responded immediately:

“ON IT! @AGPamBondi and a team of prosecutors and investigators are hard at work tonight. We will not rest until we are able to deliver justice.”

ON IT! @JesusOseteDOJ @AGPamBondi and a team of prosecutors and investigators are hard at work tonight. We will not rest until we are able to deliver justice. https://t.co/rmueos1N2T

— AAGHarmeetDhillon (@AAGDhillon) January 19, 2026

Dhillon added that the Civil Rights Division is investigating potential violations of the federal FACE Act, which protects access to houses of worship, and noted that the FBI has been activated to assess related offenses.

The FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act) is a 1994 U.S. federal law making it a crime to use force, threats, or physical obstruction to block access to reproductive health clinics or places of worship.

“The @CivilRights division is investigating the potential violations of the federal FACE Act by these people desecrating a house of worship and interfering with Christian worshippers.”

She added:

“Considering and investigating other related crimes as well.
@FBI activated too!”

Considering and investigating other related crimes as well. @FBI activated too! @TheJusticeDept

— AAGHarmeetDhillon (@AAGDhillon) January 18, 2026

In another post, Dhillon made clear that activists and so-called journalists are not shielded by the First Amendment when they disrupt religious services:

“A house of worship is not a public forum for your protest! It is a space protected from exactly such acts by federal criminal and civil laws! Nor does the First Amendment protect your pseudo journalism of disrupting a prayer service. You are on notice!”

A house of worship is not a public forum for your protest! It is a space protected from exactly such acts by federal criminal and civil laws! Nor does the First Amendment protect your pseudo journalism of disrupting a prayer service.

You are on notice! https://t.co/5QASu6N4OE

— AAGHarmeetDhillon (@AAGDhillon) January 19, 2026

Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed she is directing the investigation:

“I have been in constant communication with @AAGDhillon today over these events which @TheJusticeDept is investigating at my direction. Any violation of federal law will be prosecuted.”

I have been in constant communication with @AAGDhillon today over these events which @TheJusticeDept is investigating at my direction. Any violation of federal law will be prosecuted. https://t.co/bqR4dAm6LM

— Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) January 19, 2026

Bondi also stated she spoke directly with the targeted pastor:

“I just spoke to the Pastor in Minnesota whose church was targeted. Attacks against law enforcement and the intimidation of Christians are being met with the full force of federal law. If state leaders refuse to act responsibly to prevent lawlessness, this Department of Justice will remain mobilized to prosecute federal crimes and ensure that the rule of law prevails.”

I just spoke to the Pastor in Minnesota whose church was targeted. Attacks against law enforcement and the intimidation of Christians are being met with the full force of federal law.

If state leaders refuse to act responsibly to prevent lawlessness, this Department of Justice…

— Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) January 19, 2026

The post DOJ Now Investigating Disgraced Don Lemon and Radical Anti-ICE Mob for Potential Criminal Violations Following Minneapolis Church Disruption appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Comedian Jon Stewart has suggested that President Trump is not like Adolf Hitler because “Hitler was popular.”

Stewart made the bizarre claim during Saturday’s episode of The Late Show with Jon Stewart. 

“People keep saying this guy is Hitler. No, he’s not. And I’ll tell you why he’s not. Hitler was popular.”

”This guy is not. It ain’t flying in a lot of places where you think it might be flying.”

Watch the clip below:

Jon Stewart on Donald Trump: “People keep saying this guy is Hitler. No, he’s not. And I’ll tell you why he’s not. Hitler was popular. This guy is not. It ain’t flying in a lot of places where you think it might be flying.” pic.twitter.com/8objwJIlcG

— Marco Foster (@MarcoFoster_) January 18, 2026

While it is true that Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party rose to power democratically, the comparison or “joke” collapses when one remembers that Hitler went on to oversee a brutal and totalitarian regime in which dissent was punishable by death.

Trump, meanwhile, has won three consecutive presidential elections despite overwhelming opposition from the media and the political establishment.

Since coming back on air in 2024 after a long hiatus, Stewart has become notorious for his bizarre rants and outbursts about the current administration.

Just last week, Stewart attempted to defend the actions of Renee Good, an anti-ICE protester who was shot down after trying to run over a federal officer carrying out his duties.

“When I look at that video, I don’t see both sides in a dogmatic stance,” Stewart said at the time.

”I see a woman, maybe naive, sitting in a car thinking she has to do something and she’s going to block something, and a wildly extreme overreaction to that small act of defiance.

“And then, like, I just—when they say, like, she was radicalized, I just think, well, there are masked gunmen in her neighborhood who she’s read about taking 17-year-old kids and pulling them off the street.”

Jon Stewart suggests that trying to run over a federal agent is merely a “small act of defiance”. pic.twitter.com/HOM8GxnIZM

— Timcast News (@TimcastNews) January 13, 2026

During an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, Stewart argued the media should double down on their anti-Trump bias because that is the most effective method of resistance.

Jon Stewart and CNN Hack Christiane Amanpour Admit Anti-Trump Bias: ‘We Have to Just Keep Doing It’ (VIDEO)

The post WTH? Jon Stewart Says Trump is Not Like Hitler Because ‘Hitler Was Popular’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt sternly warned a CBS crew last week that Trump would sue the network if it did not air a recent interview in its entirety, unedited.  

“We’ll sue your ass off,” she told them.

While President Trump was visiting Detroit, Michigan, to tour a Ford plant and deliver remarks to the Detroit Economic Club on Tuesday, he sat for a 13-minute interview with CBS anchor Tony Doukoupil, during which the President trolled Doukoupil, telling him he’d be out of a job if Kamala Harris won in 2024.

“If she got in, you probably wouldn’t have a job right now,” Trump said while explaining that he inherited a dead country and turned it into the “hottest country in the world.” “You wouldn’t have this job, you wouldn’t have this job, certainly whatever the hell they’re paying you,” he continued. “We would be Venezuela on steroids.”

WATCH:

After the interview, Leavitt reportedly approached the CBS team and Doukoupil with a message from the President.

“He said, ‘Make sure you guys don’t cut the tape, make sure the interview is out in full,’” Leavitt told them, to which Doukoupil replied, “Yeah, we’re doing it, yeah,” according to a side conversation caught on tape and obtained by the New York Times.

Leavitt fired back, “He said, ‘If it’s not out in full, we’ll sue your ass off,’” which was apparently not taken too seriously at first, with some members of the team thinking it was a joke.

Executive producer of CBS Evening News, Kim Harvey, responded to the threat, telling Leavitt, “Oh, great, OK!” and Doukoupil chimed in, humorously saying, “He always says that!”

But according to the report, Leavitt did not laugh.

CBS later said in a statement, “The moment we booked this interview, we made the independent decision to air it unedited and in its entirety.”

Leavitt told the New York Times, “The American people deserve to watch President Trump’s full interviews, unedited, no cuts. And guess what? The interview ran in full.”

Trump has sued several media organizations since taking office, including CBS’s former parent company, Paramount, last year, over its edited 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. After the suit was settled, Paramount was sold to David Ellison’s Skydance.

The post “If it’s Not Out in Full, We’ll SUE YOUR ASS OFF” – White House Press Sec Karoline Leavitt Threatened CBS Team that Trump Would Sue if They Edited Interview appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Joe Allen was on War Room with Steve Bannon to discuss the Overwatch Act, which was introduced by Rep Brian Mast, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. The act provides Congressional oversight, and helps prevent hostile regimes from acquiring AI-enabled weapons.

Bannon warned against the CCP and said they are an enemy of the US. He clearly stated that there should be no help in any form when it comes to AI to an adversary of that caliber.

“The Chinese Communist Party is a sworn enemy of the United States,” Bannon said.

“Anything that helps the Chinese Communist Party build an ecosystem with chips, with training, with students, with money, with equity and debt. Anything that helps them with AI at all is bad, and must be stopped,” Bannon warned.

Bannon made a comparison to the Cold War explaining that the US did not help the Soviets during the late 50s into the early 60s.

“We did not help the Soviets during the height of the Cold War in the late 50s and early 60s. Spies gave them the atomic bomb, and spies gave them the hydrogen bomb,” Bannon said.

“We were not in the business of having American industry be in business with them and partners with them, and American capital, venture capital, private equity, anything, to help them finance it,” Bannon explained.

Allen explained what the Overwatch Act would involve, citing the main ideas of what it intends to do.

“Steve, the controversy surrounds the Overwatch Act. The Overwatch Act is put forward by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast of Florida,” Allen said.

“The bill itself basically requires the Commerce Secretary, so that would presently be Howard Lutnick, to produce a national security strategy on chip exports. That would include the AI capabilities of adversaries that would include the indigenous chip production capacity of foreign adversaries,” Allen explained.

“Any US company that wants to export to an adversary would have to submit an application to the Commerce Secretary or the Commerce Department, which would then go to Congress, and Congress would then review the application,” Allen said.

“If it was determined that the chip exports would give an advantage to a foreign adversary, they specifically name China, North Korea, Venezuela, so on and so forth, then Congress would have the power to veto the export, to block the export,” Allen continued.

“The opposition is largely based on the fear that Nvidia won’t be able to expand their market even further into China,” Allen said.

Watch:

The post Joe Allen on War Room Plugs the Overwatch Act for American AI Dominance and National Security (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.