(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and working with them through the links below which benefits Gateway Pundit. We appreciate your support!)

It doesn’t take much.

The power goes out.
The roads freeze over.
The pharmacy is technically open — but unreachable.

That’s exactly what happened to Dr. Peter McCullough.

During a recent appearance, he described being stranded for five days during severe weather:

“We haven’t been able to leave the house. We can’t get out of the driveway. The pharmacies may be open, but sometimes you still can’t get there.”

Access doesn’t fail all at once.
It fails when you need it most.

And it’s happening more often.

Winter storms. Coastal surges. Hurricanes. Tornadoes.

This winter alone, historic storms left millions without power across the East Coast. Federal data shows emergency room visits rise during and after major storms — driven by injuries, infections, and delayed treatment.

“When patients get stranded, care becomes delayed,” McCullough said. “And that can turn trivial issues into very serious matters.”

The problem isn’t the storm.

It’s being unprepared when access disappears.

When You Can’t Leave Home

McCullough said he has patients who simply can’t get out during severe weather.

“I’ve had patients who can’t get mobilized — that’s why everybody should have an emergency medical kit at home.”

He shared two recent examples.

One patient developed a viral infection that progressed to sinusitis. She started antibiotics immediately.

“It resolved in about four days. She didn’t miss work. She didn’t have to go to urgent care.”

Crisis avoided — because care was available at home.

Another patient wasn’t as fortunate.

“I had a patient… it was a case of COVID…It went untreated and ended up with a huge blood clot. It nearly took her life.”

One patient had early access.
One patient didn’t.

Access made the difference.

Don’t Wait. Be Prepared.

The Medical Emergency Kit is doctor-prescribed and contains 8 essential medications used to treat more than 30 conditions:

• Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (generic Augmentin) 875/125 mg – 28 tablets

• Azithromycin (generic Z-Pak) 250 mg – 12 tablets

• Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg – 60 capsules

• Metronidazole (generic Flagyl) 500 mg – 30 tablets

• Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (generic Bactrim) 800/160 mg – 28 tablets

• Ivermectin 12mg – 25 compounded capsules

• Fluconazole (generic Diflucan) 150 mg – 2 tablets

• Ondansetron (generic Zofran) 4mg – 6 tablets

• 1 Emergency Medication Guidebook written by the Chief Medical Board for safe use.

What people are saying about the Medical Emergency Kit:

Excellent Kit! This medical emergency kit is great. Having it “just in case” gives me peace of mind. Highly recommend. Thank you! – Melinda C.

Peace of mind. It is an amazing peace of mind to have this kit in case of emergencies and shortages. The Wellness Company did an excellent job of getting this to me in a timely manner and I and thankful to have it. – Phyllis T.

Great medical emergency kit. Kit came as advertised! Neat and orderly. The guide is great. Only plan on using it in an emergency during a difficult time. Confident it is what I was counting on. – Fred D.

Each kit includes a physician-written guide explaining when and how to use each medication, plus virtual visit access and refill options for up to two years.

“The kit has antibiotics. It has antivirals. It has antiparasitics. It has a whole host of other things you can use,” McCullough said.

You can’t predict the next storm — or the next infection.

You can prepare for it – click here to take the first step.

Note: The information provided on this website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications.

The post Dr. McCullough: When Pharmacy Access Fails appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Barack Obama’s National Security Advisor and favorite trusted henchwoman, Susan Rice, made it clear that when Democrats are back in power, MAGA will be punished for daring to step out of line.

In an interview with Preet Bharara on the “Stay Tuned with Preet” podcast in an episode titled ‘Democrats Done Playing Nice,’ Rice made it clear that Dems will weaponize the federal government (again) against Trump supporters.

Rice stated, “But when it comes to the elites, the corporate interests, the law firms, the universities, the media, I agree with you, Preet. It is not going to end well for them. For those that decided that they would act in their perceived very narrow self-interest, which I would underscore is very short-term self-interest. And, you know, take a knee to Trump. I think they’re now starting to realize, wait a minute, this is not popular.”

“Trump is not popular. What he is doing, whether on the economy and affordability or on immigration now, is not popular, and that there is likely to be a swing in the other direction. And they are going to be caught with more than their pants down.”

“They’re going to be held accountable by those who come in opposition to Trump and win at the ballot box,” she warned.

“And I can tell you, Preet, as I talk to leaders in Washington, leaders in our party, leaders in the states, if these corporations think that the Democrats, when they come back in power, are gonna play by the old rules and say, ‘oh, never mind, we’ll forgive you for all the people you’ve fired, all the policies and principles you’ve violated, all the laws you’ve skirted,’ I think they’ve got another thing coming.”

“Because just like when Trump thought, ‘okay, I’ll redistrict, and the Democrats won’t have the guts to play hardball,’ they’re going to be surprised.”

“Democrats have had a belly full and we’re not going to play by the old set of rules when these guys are playing by a very different set of rules. We’re going to play by the rules of the game. Play by the law, but that’s, we’re not going to violate the law the way they do, but we’re not going to be suckers.”

“And so I think, you know, whether you’re a law firm, whether you’re university, whether you’re media entity, whether you’re a big corporation, whether you’re big tech, you need to play a long game, not this short game that has been so detrimental.”

“There will be an accountability agenda. You know, companies already are starting to hear they better preserve their documents. They better be ready for subpoenas if they’ve done something wrong. They’ll be held accountable.

“And if they haven’t broken the law, good for them. If they’ve done the right things, good for them. That also will be noted and remembered.”

“But this is not going to be an instance of forgive and forget..”

“The damage that these people are doing is too severe to the American people and to our national interest.”

Watch:

Susan Rice offers a taste of what’s coming should the left retake power — promises Democrats will punish corporations and other institutions who have “taken a knee to Trump.”

“It’s not going to end well for them.”

“If these corporations think that the Democrats, when they come… pic.twitter.com/Hr4Lk5oica

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) February 20, 2026

Bharara is no stranger to weaponizing the government against political opponents. The former federal prosecutor, who served as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) from 2009 to 2017 under Presidents Obama and Trump, was fired by former AG Sessions for refusing to resign shortly after President Trump’s inauguration in 2016.

Bharara viciously pursued Dinesh D’Souza and charged him with violating federal campaign finance laws after he directed and released the anti-Obama film, “2016: Obama’s America”. He was indicted over illegal campaign contributions.

In January 2018, D’Souza said his FBI file, obtained by the House Intel Committee, shows the FBI red-flagged him as a “critic of Obama” and subsequently allocated $100,000 to investigate a $20,000 case.

The post Susan Rice’s Dark Warning: MAGA Faces Retribution and a Weaponized Deep State Under Future Democrat Rule- ‘They Better Be Ready for Subpoenas’ (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The post Pulling the Sword from the Stone: Why AbleChild Matters appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Last month, the Colorado Court of Appeals heard the appeal of 70-year-old former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters.  Peters is serving over 9 years following her August 2024 conviction at La Vista Correctional Facility in Pueblo, Colorado.  Peters was condemned to this medium-security prison, despite Peters’ being a non-violent, first-time offender.

On Wednesday, Peters was denied bond by the very same court.  In Colorado, a defendant has 49 days to seek review of a decision denying bond from a district court.  Peters’ bond appeal came “more than fifteen months after the district court issued the order,” the ruling states.

The appellate court has not yet ruled on the merits of Peters’ arguments, but rather only on the bond issue thus far.

According to her counsel’s arguments last month, Peters is being held among “murderers, child molesters, and drug dealers” in Colorado prison because Colorado only has four minimum security facilities and all four are exclusively for men.

“You have a 70-year-old woman, non-violent, first offense, probation eligible, never had a traffic ticket before this, given 9 years in the penitentiary.  Under DOC regulations, she ought to be in a minimum security facility with similar defendants,” Peters’ attorney argued during the appeals hearing.

This seems like an Equal Protection violation and/or an Eighth Amendment violation by keeping a non-violent senior citizen and Gold Star mother whose son died in service to this country as an elite Navy SEAL incarcerated with violent offenders while herself being convicted of deceiving a public servant.

You can read the ruling here:

Skip to PDF content

Skip to PDF content

The appellate court also denied Peters’ request to have a new district court judge reassigned in the bond matter after Peters’ counsel argued that Judge Matthew Barrett violated her First Amendment rights.

The convictions were for:

• attempting to influence a public servant
• conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation
• first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty
• failure to comply with the Secretary of State’s requirements

Peters was not charged with any election violations or any charges involving the voting systems in her possession, despite misconceptions among the public.

During the mid-January Colorado Court of Appeals hearing, the three-judge panel scrutinized  the handling of Peters’ case.  Senior Assistant Attorney General Lisa Michaels represented the State of Colorado during the proceeding.

The Gateway Pundit reported extensively on the January appellate hearing and the issues the three-judge panel raised with the State.

WATCH: Colorado Appellate Court Judges Eviscerate Colorado’s Case Against Tina Peters’ in Appeals Hearing

During the hearing, the panel tore apart Senior Assistant AG Lisa Michaels.  Judge Ted C. Tow asked, "Is it your position that a person can still be convicted of a crime with which they were never charged and with which the jury was never instructed, as long as the evidence is sufficient?”

At issue was, among other things, the district court judge improperly instructing the jury on a misdemeanor charge that was misrepresented as a felony.  This resulted in an additional fifteen months being added to Peters' sentence.

Tina Peters Appeals Clip:

One of the charges was COMPLETELY misrepresented to the jury as a FELONY when it was actually the verbiage of a MISDEMEANOR!

This could potentially lead to a mistrial of the whole case! pic.twitter.com/ZxpOMJQFUq

— CannCon (@canncon) January 15, 2026

Additionally, The Gateway Pundit reported that Judge Matthew Barrett restricted Peters from making certain arguments and presenting evidence to refute the charges levied against her.

“When it comes to a defendant’s Constitutional Right to present a complete defense, does a trial court have the ability to curtail that in the interest of not letting the sideshow overcome the circus?  Don’t they have a Constitutional Right to present a complete defense?  And the only restriction on that I think is out there is that means the Court can prevent cumulative or irrelevant evidence, but I cannot curtail the presentation of relevant evidence," Judge Tow inquired.

Tina Peters Appeals Clip:

Judge Matthew Barrett SEVERELY restricted Tina Peters from making any sort of defense against some of the charges levied against her.

You MUST hear the State's ABSURD justification for WHY the judge didn't allow the evidence to be presented!!!

It's… pic.twitter.com/KegANYFJey

— CannCon (@canncon) January 15, 2026

Lastly, the panel of judges took issue with the district court judge's remarks before sentencing.

Tina Peters Appeals Clip:

Judge Matthew Barrett's remarks before sentencing were CRUEL, DISPARAGING, HUMILIATING, and DOWNRIGHT AWFUL.

And he invoked claims and beliefs OF HIS OWN that Tina Peters was NOT allowed to present in her trial!!! pic.twitter.com/kKBj4y4Lcr

— CannCon (@canncon) January 15, 2026

The post Colorado Appeals Court Denies Tina Peters Bond — 70-Year-Old Gold Star Mother to Remain in Prison appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.