The O’Keefe Media on Tuesday released part III of its cash-for-ballots investigation into voter fraud in California.

In part III, undercover journalists discovered that the petition fraudsters are logging into an online database to get real voter names for the forged signatures.

Sigvalid.com was identified as the online database.

Per OMG:

In Part III of the cash-for-ballots investigation, petition fraudsters on Skid Row in Los Angeles were caught on hidden camera logging into an online database accessing registered voter names and addresses. These identities were then given to homeless individuals and used to sign in the name of on election petitions.

Our undercover footage shows these signatures completed under false identities, followed by cash payments.

We tracked the names used in the footage and went door-to-door to verify the individuals whose names appeared in the footage. Residents confirmed the addresses were accurate, but denied ever signing any petitions.

Actual voters are angry and demanding authorities take action.

“That’s my address… but that wasn’t me,” one of the voters said.

WATCH:

California Identity Scam: Petition Fraudsters Logging Into Online Database To Supply Real Voter Names For Forged Signatures & Streamline Ballot Petition Payments

“You’re not gonna use your name… I’m giving you one.”

Residents Are OUTRAGED After Learning Their Identities Were… pic.twitter.com/Jtwfb8g7Hh

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) March 31, 2026

The O’Keefe Media Group last Tuesday released video evidence of more California election fraud crimes.

Undercover journalists revealed that homeless people are being paid by petitioners to forge real voters’ signatures to sign ballot petitions on Skid Row.

“In Part II of Cash for Ballots, series hidden camera footage shows petition circulators paying homeless individuals $2–$3 per form to sign ballot petitions using the names and addresses of real registered voters and forging their signatures,” James O’Keefe said.

“Circulators provided printed lists of voters, assigned identities, and directed the homeless individuals exactly what to write, monitoring them to ensure the information matched so the circulators get paid,” O’Keefe said.

BREAKING: CALIFORNIA MASS IN-PERSON ELECTION FRAUD CRIMES CAUGHT ON CAMERA:

Recordings Show Homeless Are Paid By Petitioners To FORGE Real Voters’ Signatures To Sign Ballot Petitions On Skid Row, Thousands of Times

Disenfranchised Voters Say They Are OUTRAGED After Being Shown… pic.twitter.com/Hu0IHvphE5

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) March 24, 2026

Earlier this month the O’Keefe Media Group released part one of its investigation into a California elections fraud cash for ballots scheme.

James O’Keefe and his team of journalists went undercover on Skid Row in Los Angeles posing as homeless people.

‘Petitioners’ told the undercover journalists that they are paid between $7-$10 per signature. Some of them earn up to $1,000 per day.

“California NGOs Encourage Fake Addresses To Homeless People To Sign Petitions & Register Voters, A State & Federal Felony. Footage Shows 28 Instances Of Cash Changing Hands For Ballot Signatures & Voter Registration Forms,” they said.

WATCH:

CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS FRAUD CASH FOR BALLOTS PART I: Homeless Bribed with Cash & Drugs In Exchange For Registering To Vote & Signing Election Petitions Caught On Tape Undercover On Skid Row In California.

“You can just put Pinocchio Lane.”

California NGOs Encourage Fake… pic.twitter.com/2pkylhgPY9

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) March 17, 2026

The post O’Keefe Media Group: California Identity Scam: Petition Fraudsters Log Into Online Database to Get Real Voter Names for Forged Signatures (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The New York Times was forced to issue a second correction following a complaint by the Trump administration regarding its article about securing the supply chain for energy and technology amid the ongoing war with Iran.

The story was titled, “Trump Sets Up ‘Pax Silica’ Fund to Reduce Global Dependencies,” referring to a fund that could potentially be invested in energy projects, minerals, and semiconductors.

Other countries, including Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Sweden, will also be participating.

Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg announced the news in Washington, D.C. last week.

“The fund will serve as a catalyst, a credible call to action for partners around the world to put serious capital behind shared strategic objectives,” he said at a breakfast for the Hill and Valley Forum.

Helberg, however, posted his full remarks on the social media site X with the following message: “The @NYTimes completely FABRICATED quotes that never happened. We submitted corrections (multiple times). They ignored them. So for posterity, sharing my full remarks.”

The @NYTimes completely FABRICATED quotes that never happened. We submitted corrections (multiple times). They ignored them. So for posterity, sharing my full remarks. https://t.co/IfEWvimG6i pic.twitter.com/TrW0OQG20Q

— Under Secretary of State Jacob S. Helberg (@UnderSecE) March 29, 2026

The first correction came on the same day the article was published.

“A correction was made on March 23, 2026: An earlier version of this article misstated the amount of funding being sought for a new investment consortium. It is over $1 trillion, not $4 trillion,” a note at the bottom of the story read.

Then, almost one week later, the newspaper updated the piece with a second correction.

“A correction was made on March 29, 2026,” the second note explained. “An earlier version of this article misstated the amount of money that would be invested in projects. The members involved in the consortium have over $1 trillion in assets under management. They have not committed to investing $1 trillion.”

“The article also misquoted Jacob Helberg, the Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs,” it continued. “He called the situation unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz, where shipping traffic has been largely blocked, ‘a lesson,’ not ‘a blessing.’”

This isn’t the first time the White House has had to do battle with The New York Times.

President Donald Trump is still pursuing legal action against them after he initially sued the outlet for $15 billion over defamation claims linked to his financial history and taxes.

His original suit was dismissed, but the president refiled in October, and the case is now making its way through the courts.

Later, federal U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman, who is an appointee of former Democratic President Bill Clinton, sided with The New York Times in March, saying the Pentagon violated the First Amendment when it set new rules for reporters. Reporters walked out in defiance rather than sign on to the new standards, according to The Associated Press.

The new policy included terms that would have allowed the Pentagon to revoke press passes for anyone deemed a security threat. It said that possessing confidential or unauthorized information could be grounds for revocation as well.

Reporters were also asked to pledge that they’d obtain, or solicit, information only from authorized War Department officials, and the new rules also restricted access in certain cases.

Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell wrote on X earlier this month that, “We disagree with the decision and are pursuing an immediate appeal.”

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has expressed frustration with information exposure, especially given the sensitive nature of national security matters. In April 2025, one of his top aides was escorted from the building after reportedly being identified during an investigation focused on leakers.

The saga didn’t end there, however. The New York Times claimed Monday that the Pentagon ignored Friedman’s order by instituting new policies as a workaround to the ruling, yet Pentagon officials maintained they are in full compliance with the judge’s requirements.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post New York Times Issues Correction After Getting Called Out by Trump Admin Over ‘Fabricated Quotes’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced Tuesday evening he is lifting the suspension of the aircrew involved in the flyby of 2 Army AH-64 Apache helicopters near music icon and Trump supporter Kid Rock’s Nashville, Tennessee area home on Saturday. Rock has also done several USO tours to perform for troops overseas in war zones.

NBC News reported earlier Tuesday that the Army had suspended the aircrew pending an investigation.

“Thank you @KidRock. @USArmy pilots suspension LIFTED. No punishment. No investigation. Carry on, patriots”

Thank you @KidRock.@USArmy pilots suspension LIFTED.

No punishment. No investigation.

Carry on, patriots. https://t.co/Zqhv1Zx1iG

— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) March 31, 2026

Hegseth’s announcement came within an hour of President Trump saying he would take a look into it in response to a question by Fox News reporter Peter Doocy spoke about the flyby:

Reporter: There was a viral video this week of army helicopters near Kid Rock’s house.

Trump: I’m sure they had a good time.

Reporter: They said the crews of the helicopters had been suspended. What do you think of that?

Trump: They probably should not have been doing it. I will take a look at it. If they like Kid Rock, I like Kid Rock. Maybe they were trying to defend him.

Reporter: There was a viral video this week of army helicopters near Kid Rock’s house.

Trump: I’m sure they had a good time.

Reporter: They said the crews of the helicopters had been suspended. What do you think of that?

Trump: They probably should not have been doing it. I… pic.twitter.com/0tm5NAK8ws

— Acyn (@Acyn) March 31, 2026

Rock, who also performs under his given name Robert Ritchie, posted videos of the flyby on Saturday at his replica “Southern White House” built high on a hilltop outside Nashville:

pic.twitter.com/PGltex7Dq6

— KidRock (@KidRock) March 28, 2026

Rock spoke to Nashville TV station WKRN-TV Monday, explaining that during a Thanksgiving visit with Vice President JD Vance at nearby Fort Campbell he had invited flight crews to “cruise by” his place after seeing them fly by his home on several occasions. Rock said the Saturday flyby was not planned and that he was taken by surprise.

Rock also said he wasn’t worried the crews would be disciplined, saying, “I think they’re gonna be alright, my buddy is commander-in-chief.”

Turns out he was right.

Video from 2003 USO tour:

The post Pete Hegseth Cancels Suspension of Aircrew in Kid Rock Helicopter Flyby; “No Punishment. No Investigation.” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.