Kamala Harris Launches Attack on President Trump Outside a Gas Station and It Promptly Blows Up in Her Face (VIDEO)
April 16, 2026
Kamala Harris poses for a photo-op at a gas station in Charlotte, North Carolina to try to dunk on President Trump. Credit: Kamala Harris X screenshot.
Kamala Harris proved once again this week that her political instincts remain as sharp as a spoon when she decided to pose for a cheap photo-op to dunk on President Trump’s foreign and energy policies.
Harris, who is admittedly considering a third run for the presidency, decided to pose for a video on Wednesday outside a gas station in Charlotte, North Carolina, to attack the Trump Administration over higher gas prices.
In the footage, Harris bemoans the rise in gasoline prices thanks to “Trump’s war of choice” and accuses him of acting only in his political and personal interests.
“So, I’m here in Charlotte. Since the start of Trump’s war of choice, it’s 15 more dollars every time you fill up a tank of gas,” Harris says.
“The price of diesel has gone up 80% since the start of the war and you best believe that’s going to carry over to how much you’re paying for all the goods that being transported on those semis,” she continues.
“We’ve got a president who is paying more attention to what he thinks is in his best political interest and personal interest as opposed to what’s in the best interest of working people in America.”
WATCH:
Here in North Carolina and around the country, gas prices are too high. This is a direct result of Donald Trump’s war of choice in Iran, and the American people are paying the price. pic.twitter.com/gsynOMKqC7
Of course, this attack predictably backfired because the sky-high gasoline prices from the Biden regime were still fresh on Americans’ minds.
They did not hesitate to hit her with this devastating reminder:
Please tell me this account got hacked because this is beyond bad, and P.S. Kamala, even half-assing a little research could help you because on June 13, 2022 when you were VP gas was $4.67 per gallon for regular unleaded gas in North Carolina. That number is higher than the…
Oh please, Kamala Over $5/gallon under you and Biden — I remember that ‘relief’ all too well. Blaming Trump for $3.97 now? Maybe sit this one out before the clown car runs out of gas on your watch. pic.twitter.com/S8xKytHCrY
One can only hope the Democrats nominate Harris again to represent them in 2028, should she choose to run. She is truly the gift that keeps on giving for the GOP.
A Difficult Lesson from the Burma War: Loving Your Enemy
April 16, 2026
Rangers administer medical aid to a young Burma Army soldier. Photo courtesy of Free Burma Rangers (FBR).
The arm of Yaza, a Ranger who quickly offered his blood to the Burma Army soldier.
On April 14, 2026, during the Thingyan Water Festival, the Burmese New Year, a Myanmar military jet carried out an airstrike that destroyed a building at Mutraw Junior College. The school has already moved twice because of ongoing attacks.
The strike occurred amid an intensified bombing campaign in and around civilian villages. Junta aircraft, including jets and Y-12 transport planes, began conducting nightly airstrikes, typically during evening hours, with reported bombing windows between 9:00 and 10:30 p.m. In addition to the school being hit, livestock were killed.
Members of a church group not affiliated with the armed forces were killed and injured in one of the airstrikes. A pastor lost his leg, and several church members were wounded, while at least one person remains missing. Similar incidents occur frequently, with attacks targeting civilian areas on a near-daily basis. It is believed that the junta uses its air power against civilian areas in an effort to pressure local populations. However, these tactics have not reduced resistance. Instead, they have reinforced opposition to military rule.
After the American Revolution and the Civil War, there were very limited trials, punishments, and executions of those who supported the losing side. No Confederate leader was executed after the Civil War, and no Loyalists were systematically prosecuted after the Revolution; many simply emigrated. Gandhi, who explicitly rejected armed resistance against the British, understood that violent revolutions almost universally produce cycles of retribution and reprisal that destroy the societies they were meant to liberate.
This is one of the many reasons why the American experiment has worked, while so few bloody revolutions in other countries have resulted in peaceful, orderly societies with the degree of prosperity and opportunity we enjoy in America.
To achieve this miracle of national reconciliation, there must be forgiveness. Christian soldiers in the Burma war regularly pray that God will change the hearts of the enemy. “They have the right to defend themselves and their families,” said David Eubank, the founder of Free Burma Rangers (FBR), a faith-based frontline aid organization. “But in order for victory not to lead to ongoing slaughter, there has to be forgiveness.”
Against this backdrop of a war against the civilian population, including attacks on churches and temples, hundreds of thousands of young people across the nation have joined the resistance to defend their homeland, their families, and their right to exist. Among them are volunteer medics who risk their lives to save others. FBR trains local combat medics and works alongside them in the war, where a motivating Bible verse is John 15:13 (KJV): “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”
Certainly, it is noble, and a fulfillment of Christ’s teachings, for medics to risk or sacrifice their lives to save the innocent, but the truest test of one’s commitment to faith is the willingness to love one’s enemy and to risk your life to save the very soldiers who burned your village or killed your family members.
In December of last year, just days before Christmas, during one of the worst battles of the year, in which 12 civilians had already been killed, Free Burma Rangers discovered a wounded Burma Army soldier among those captured by resistance forces.
Travis White, a volunteer medic with FBR, asked permission to treat the wounded soldier. David Eubank, FBR’s founder, always makes it clear to wounded Burmese soldiers that he and the Rangers have no control over their fate or how long it will be until they are released. The resistance armies have their own rules and policies, and the only thing FBR has control over is its own actions. In the case of wounded enemy soldiers, they see their mission as treating and helping all people made in the image of God.
The commander gave permission for the medics to work on the prisoner. Eubank told him, “I know the feeling is to let him die for all the things he’s done against your people. We’ve all lost friends here, and we’ve all seen children and families killed. But when I pray, I think that God wants us to show mercy. So we will take responsibility for him if you choose to let him live.”
The commander stated emphatically, “I choose to let him live.”
White, who spent more than a decade as a civilian firefighter-paramedic before joining FBR a year earlier, said, “I asked Dave, ‘How much should I do for this guy?’ And Dave said, ‘Do everything you can. Don’t worry about the outcome.’” According to information given by the patient, he had been wounded 24 to 30 hours earlier. He had an open femur fracture and had taken shrapnel through the shoulder, which was also broken. White said he had lost so much blood that “he wasn’t even bleeding anymore from his wounds.” A blood transfusion would be necessary to save the soldier’s life.
David Eubank prays over an injured Burma Army soldier. Photo courtesy of Free Burma Rangers (FBR).
In Burma, even hospitals have little to no electricity and almost no refrigeration; on the battlefield, even less. This means that blood transfusions must come directly from another Ranger or soldier willing to donate their blood.
In a hierarchy of sacrifice, the easiest choice is risking your life to save the innocent. Risking your life to save the enemy is more difficult, but giving your blood to the enemy is a line that many people have trouble crossing. Understandably, especially after witnessing a massacre of the civilian population, a donor may need some convincing, or time to think and pray before agreeing to open their veins for the enemy.
In this instance, however, before White even asked, his translator, an ethnic Ranger named Yaza, said, “If he needs blood, I’ll give him mine.”
The arm of Yaza, a Ranger who quickly offered his blood to the Burma Army soldier. Photo courtesy of Free Burma Rangers (FBR).
White pointed out that one of the issues with donating blood in a combat situation is that it weakens you physically. I have personally witnessed medics stumbling, lightheaded, because they had donated blood earlier in the day. It takes a special type of person to weaken themselves to that degree to save someone who, until hours earlier, was trying to kill you.
The wounded soldier was a Buddhist and had served in the junta’s army, but by treating him with kindness, the Rangers believe they are fulfilling Jesus’ commandment to “love one another, as I have loved you.” (John 13:34, KJV)
Over the next four days, the team returned repeatedly to provide wound care, pain relief, and antibiotics. Travis said they also continued sharing the gospel, explaining that Jesus’ sacrifice was like the blood given to save the soldier’s life. He said they emphasized forgiveness and the command to love one’s enemies.
On the final visit, the soldier expressed a desire to accept Jesus. The Rangers prayed that God would reveal Himself to the wounded man, who remained in critical condition.
In the end, White may never know what happened to the wounded soldier, but he, the Rangers, and the resistance soldiers who witnessed these acts of kindness will be able to say with full honesty that they did everything possible. When Christians take communion, they receive the body and blood of Christ, as taught in Matthew 26:26–28.
On Easter Sunday, the time when most Christians focus on the sacrifice and resurrection, I asked David Eubank to comment on the lessons learned from the incident back in December. He cited Matthew 28:18–20, saying these “are the words and commands that Jesus gave us, and that we try to live out in our work. This is what He said right after He rose from the dead and before He went up to heaven. His Spirit is still with us to help us in our need and to help others in their need. This is the spiritual mission of the Free Burma Rangers, to serve God and serve people, and to encourage them to follow Jesus and accept His gift of salvation on earth and in heaven.”
The author, Antonio Graceffo, regularly reports from the front lines in Burma.
Is Anyone but AbleChild Willing to Call Out PA Gov. Shapiro’s Proven Lie About a “New” Behavioral Health Commission?
April 16, 2026
Is Anyone but AbleChild Willing to Call Out Shapiro’s Proven Lie About a “New” Behavioral Health Commission? Republished with permission from AbleChild. The PA governor’s announcement to “grow oversight” … Read more
Democrat Rep. Shri Thanedar Gets Absolutely Roasted on X After Pathetic Attempt to Mock Stephen Miller’s Looks — Backfires in Epic Fashion
April 16, 2026
Rep. Shri Thanedar attempted to mock Stephen Miller’s appearance on X but the internet quickly flipped the script
A Democrat congressman thought he had landed a viral punchline, instead, he walked straight into a digital buzzsaw.
Far-left Congressman Shri Thanedar is being mercilessly roasted online after attempting to mock White House official Stephen Miller and getting obliterated in the process.
The online clash erupted after Katie Miller, wife of Stephen Miller, posted a blunt observation on X that clearly struck a nerve with the Left:
“Liberal men aren’t attractive.”
Katie Miller pointed to data suggesting that 60% of extremely liberal men aged 35–45 are childless, compared to just 22% of extremely conservative men.
— Congressman Shri Thanedar (@RepShriThanedar) April 15, 2026
Big, big mistake. The internet, and especially the MAGA warriors on X, absolutely torched the Democrat congressman in the most brutal backfires in recent memory.
Katie Miller herself clapped back instantly, posting a screenshot of Thanedar’s own face with the savage reply: “Prove my point for me.”
Frank Pavone: Perspectives on the Pope and the President
April 16, 2026
Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Guest Post by Pro-life Leader Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life
Here’s something on which the Pope and the President clearly agree.
The Pope said to journalists that he is not a politician. And President Trump said on Truth Social that he doesn’t want the Pope to be a politician.
What’s the source of the problem, then?
Actually, it’s not hard to understand, and it’s a point that Catholic Church documents have made in the past: there’s a difference between asserting moral teaching and applying it.
The former requires doctrinal clarity and is a duty of church leaders.
The latter requires prudential judgments based on changing facts and circumstances, and is a duty of politicians.
So, for instance, on immigration, the Church’s teaching, articulated in the Catechism and elsewhere, is that nations should be generous to the extent that they can and under the limits they set.
So what is that “extent” and what are those limits? That’s for lawmakers and the President to decide, not the Pope, and we elect our President and legislators to evaluate the circumstances and craft public policy accordingly.
Said another way, there is no “church teaching” about how many deportations should occur, or when, or what the judicial process should be leading to an order of deportation.
Now if President Trump and his Administration were to say, “Immigration is wrong and America should no longer under any circumstance ever welcome anyone again, whether we can afford it or not,” that would violate Church teaching.
But he’s not saying that.
As we all know, he’s saying immigrants should come in legally and that our laws should be enforced. That is completely consistent with Church teaching.
So if the Pope or the US bishops have an opinion about ICE, for instance (as the DNC-loyal Cardinals on 60 Minutes did), they can express that opinion, but they should make it clear that it’s an opinion, not “church teaching.”
This is where the Pope and bishops fail, and it’s a disservice to Catholics, to Americans, and to the Trump Administration. When the Pope or bishops express an opinion on a prudential judgment made by public officials elected precisely to make those decisions, anyone is free to disagree with that opinion, and such disagreement is fully consistent both with respect for the Church and with being a faithful Catholic.
Let’s consider war.
The first moral principle is that nobody can target innocent people for destruction.
But that’s not what President Trump and his Administration do. If they did, it would clearly be a moral violation. But they don’t, and it’s insulting to imply otherwise.
The other principle is that sometimes force is justified to defend the innocent.
And here again is where prudential judgment enters in. We’ve elected the President to make these decisions and evaluations. We can agree or disagree, but disagreement with a prudential decision should not be characterized as some kind of moral or religious violation.
The Pope says we should not “wage war.”
Can we please get beyond the ambiguity? Tell us if you mean targeting the innocent or using force to defend the innocent!
Of course, the Catholic Democrat-sympathizing radical Left have used the distinction between Church teaching and prudential judgment when it suits them. On the matter of abortion, for instance, you’ll find some Catholic theologians opining that while abortion is wrong, crafting laws prohibiting it are not necessarily the right prudential judgment.
How convenient for them. “Oh yes, we’re prolife. We adhere to the teaching. But we vote for pro-abortion Democrats anyway.”
We have to get beyond magisterium by journalism and magisterium by soundbite. If the Pope wants to make a point, then teach thoroughly and clearly in a talk or document, making the necessary distinctions between Church teaching (which Church members are committed to believe) and prudential judgment (with which Church members – and, of course, everyone else – may disagree).
Moreover, reference the longstanding teaching of the Church expressed in countless documents throughout two millennia. Don’t give the impression that you are some kind of oracle from God, generating new teaching day by day.
And finally, we as believers and as loyal Americans have to keep our eyes on the prize. We are living in an unprecedented era of American leadership and progress.
President Trump has ended multiple wars all over the earth. Under the second Trump Administration the US murder rate has dropped to its lowest in America since 1900. The illegal border crossings are at zero. Real wages for families are significantly higher. Inflation has been tamed. Religious freedom is flourishing, as is freedom of speech. Woke bias in the traditional media, social media, universities and businesses is being reined in. Our nation is leaving harmful international alliances and organizations, and is decimating terrorism.
And that’s just scratching the surface of the long litany of the amazing results of a President who has an ability to solve so many problems that previous Presidents have wanted to solve if they only had the wisdom and courage.
And yet too often we are distracted by outrage at language, at a social media post, at a comment to reporter.
Every moment we spend caught up in rage about the “inappropriateness” of a social media post is a moment we could have gotten caught up instead in gratefulness for the lowest murder rate in over a century. Every statement warning people about foul language could instead have been a statement awakening them to the flourishing of religious freedom.
May all of us – citizens, voters, and religious leaders — keep our eyes on the prize, and let’s not miss the moment to both absorb, defend and build on the amazing progress of what is truly the dawn of America’s Golden Age.
Prolife Leader Frank Pavone (@frfrankpavone) is the National Director of Priests for Life, the President of the National Pro-life Religious Council, and the Pastoral Director of Rachel’s Vineyard and Silent No More. See www.ProLifeCentral.org.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
(@TheYadkinJD) April 16, 2026
Over $5/gallon under you and Biden — I remember that ‘relief’ all too well. Blaming Trump for $3.97 now? Maybe sit this one out before the clown car runs out of gas on your watch. pic.twitter.com/S8xKytHCrY
︎ (@tommyborumjokes) 
(@GuntherEagleman) 
