Sweden Cracks Down: Parliament Bans Cousin Marriage After Years of Mass Migration Fallout

Sweden Cracks Down: Parliament Bans Cousin Marriage After Years of Mass Migration Fallout

Sweden Cracks Down: Parliament Bans Cousin Marriage After Years of Mass Migration Fallout
May 27, 2026

Sweden’s parliament, presently controlled by center-right, conservative majority, has taken a decisive step in confronting a controversial practice increasingly linked to migration, unanimously voting to ban cousin marriages and other close-relative unions in what many see as a long-overdue correction to decades of failed integration policies.

The new law, according reports from the Swedish press, introduces a blanket prohibition on marriages between cousins, as well as a wider ban on unions between other close relatives. It is scheduled to come into force on July 1, 2026.

Crucially, the legislation goes beyond domestic law. Foreign cousin marriages will also, as a general rule, no longer be recognized in Sweden, closing a major legal loophole.

Lawmakers say the move is aimed at addressing serious social problems. Chief among them are Islamic honor-based oppression, coercion, and the systemic pressure placed on young women in certain communities.

For years, Sweden maintained one of Europe’s most permissive legal frameworks on this issue. While marriage between direct relatives such as parents and children has long been banned, cousin marriages remained legal.

Even more striking, half-siblings could previously marry with special dispensation. These legal gaps were increasingly exploited in parallel societies that developed alongside mass migration.

The government’s own inquiry, launched last year, concluded that change was necessary. Investigators pointed to clear risks associated with such marriages, particularly for girls and women.

The report found that cousin marriages are often tied to systems of control. These include family pressure, limited personal freedom, and the enforcement of traditional social hierarchies.

In many cases, the decision to marry is not fully voluntary. Authorities have warned that coercion and cultural expectations can play a significant role.

The new law seeks to address these concerns directly. It removes the possibility of exemptions and introduces a uniform standard across the country.

It also extends the ban to other close relatives. Marriages between uncles and nieces, for example, will now be prohibited.

In addition, the previous allowance for half-sibling marriages will be abolished. Lawmakers say this reflects a broader effort to align Swedish law with modern standards.

Support for the measure was unusually broad. Parties across the political spectrum backed the legislation, reflecting growing consensus on the issue.

The decision also aligns Sweden with similar moves elsewhere in Europe. Norway, for example, recently adopted its own ban on cousin marriages.

Health concerns played a role in that decision. Studies have linked cousin marriages to increased risks of genetic disorders, infant mortality, and other serious conditions.

Swedish authorities have acknowledged these risks as well. However, the primary focus has remained on social and cultural impacts.

The debate around the law has also highlighted broader questions about integration. An increasing number of Swedes are realizing that the government’s earlier policies failed to address fundamental cultural differences.

Over the past decade, the country has taken in large numbers of migrants, many from Muslim-majority regions. This has reshaped Swedish society in profound ways.

Issues such as parallel legal norms, social segregation, and differing views on family and marriage have become increasingly visible. These tensions have fueled political debate.

Proponents of the new law say it represents a necessary step toward restoring common standards. They argue that one legal system must apply to everyone, regardless of background.

Independent media outlets have played a key role in bringing these issues to light. In many cases, they reported on practices and trends that mainstream outlets were reluctant to address.

The cousin marriage ban is seen by some as a recognition of those concerns. It reflects a shift toward a more assertive approach to cultural integration.

Still, the broader challenges remain. Questions about immigration policy, social cohesion, and national identity continue to dominate the political landscape, and will more than likely continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

The law is not just about marriage, but a part of a larger debate about the future direction of Swedish society.

As the country moves toward implementing the ban, attention will turn to enforcement. Ensuring that the new rules are applied consistently will be a key test.

The July 2026 deadline marks a turning point, but whether it signals a broader policy shift toward civilizational, cultural continuity remains to be seen.

The post Sweden Cracks Down: Parliament Bans Cousin Marriage After Years of Mass Migration Fallout appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Robert Semonsen

Homeland Security ‘Drawing Up Plans’ to Suspend International Flights Into Sanctuary Cities Until They Stop Protecting Illegal Aliens

Homeland Security ‘Drawing Up Plans’ to Suspend International Flights Into Sanctuary Cities Until They Stop Protecting Illegal Aliens

Homeland Security ‘Drawing Up Plans’ to Suspend International Flights Into Sanctuary Cities Until They Stop Protecting Illegal Aliens
May 27, 2026

Crowd of travelers waiting in line at international arrivals immigration with various luggage at an airport.

The Trump administration is considering plans to suspend immigration and customs processing at airports in Democrat-run sanctuary cities.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said the administration is drawing up plans to halt processing at airports in Democratic-run jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.

Mullin confirmed the plans in an interview on Fox News host Sean Hannity.

“We’re currently drawing up plans to say listen, in these sanctuary cities, where the local, radical left Democrats aren’t allowing us to do our job and enforce federal laws, then we shouldn’t be processing international flights into their cities either,” he explained.

“Because they don’t want us to enforce immigration, but they want us to process immigration at their facilities? Nothing about that makes sense to me.”

The proposal would impact some of the country’s busiest international gateways, including airports in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, Boston, Denver, Philadelphia, and Newark.

Millions of international visitors are expected to arrive in the United States in June for the FIFA World Cup, with matches taking place across the country.

Sanctuary cities deliberately limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, particularly Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to protect their illegal alien populations.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) previously identified multiple states and cities that it said obstruct federal immigration enforcement.

The proposal would reportedly halt not only international passenger arrivals but also cargo processing at affected airports.

Mullin has previously floated a similar idea of pulling Customs and Border Protection (CBP) operations from major international airports.

DHS Secretary Mullin Threatens to Remove CBP Operation from Sanctuary City International Airports Until They Stop Harboring Illegals and Comply with Federal Law

However, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has expressed his opposition to the idea.

“We have people from around the world and around the country that need to be able to fly into all different kinds of places,” Duffy said.

”We shouldn’t shut down air travel in a state that doesn’t agree with our politics,” he continued.

While plans have been drawn up, a final decision on the proposal has not been made.

The post Homeland Security ‘Drawing Up Plans’ to Suspend International Flights Into Sanctuary Cities Until They Stop Protecting Illegal Aliens appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Ben Kew

Spanish Police Raids Former Socialist PM Zapatero’s Office, Seize Luxury Jewels and Watches in Corruption Probe

Spanish Police Raids Former Socialist PM Zapatero’s Office, Seize Luxury Jewels and Watches in Corruption Probe

Spanish Police Raids Former Socialist PM Zapatero’s Office, Seize Luxury Jewels and Watches in Corruption Probe
May 27, 2026

Former Spanish socialist PM Zapatero – Wiki Commons

Socialism, thy name is graft.

The Spanish Socialist Party (PSOE) is living a major crisis, with electoral defeats, corruption investigations and prosecutions, and widespread allegations of sexual harassment and sexual assault.

Besides the current Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez having his wife, his brother, and multiple key allies under investigation for corruption, now the former PM José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero is under investigation for influence-peddling and other offenses by a judge examining the state bailout of a Venezuela-linked airline.

Besides that, a police raid in his house and offices found and seized luxury jewelry, deepening the scandal engulfing the Sánchez government.

Nelson Piñero on X: “Being a socialist means having very little money! According to the Spanish newspaper ABC, the jewels seized from a hidden safe owned by the Chavista Rodríguez Zapatero are estimated to be worth between 4 and 5 million euros (including diamonds, rubies, and sapphires).”

The Telegraph reported:

“The haul included high-end watches, bracelets, rings and pendants which were found inside José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero’s safe this week.

Mr. Zapatero has been named as a suspect by a Spanish judge investigating a Covid-era bailout for a Venezuela-linked airline suspected of being a front for money laundering.”

Sanchez and his wife Begoña Gómez: mired in corruption scandals

“The socialist politician led Spain between 2004 and 2011 and belongs to the same party as Mr Sánchez whose government is reeling from corruption allegations amid an investigation into a state-backed loan of €53m (£45m) to the failing small airline Plus Ultra in 2021.

They believe the cash, of which only €14m (£12m) has been repaid, was funneled into bank accounts outside Spain belonging to a gang that was laundering Venezuelan money.

During his premiership, Mr. Zapatero developed close ties to the South American country, and with its now-ousted leader Nicolás Maduro and his successor Delcy Rodríguez.”

Two of Sánchez’s party secretaries have been jailed for corruption since he became prime minister, and his brother David Sánchez is set to go on trial this week on corruption charges – while his wife, Begoña Gómez, is facing a judicial investigation over alleged influence peddling.

Read more:

SHOCK VIDEO: Hundreds of African Men Try to Storm the Border Between Morocco and the Spanish Enclave of Ceuta

The post Spanish Police Raids Former Socialist PM Zapatero’s Office, Seize Luxury Jewels and Watches in Corruption Probe appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Paul Serran

(VIDEO) UNHINGED Leftist Screams “Nazi B*tch” at Fox Reporter Covering Newark ICE Riots

(VIDEO) UNHINGED Leftist Screams “Nazi B*tch” at Fox Reporter Covering Newark ICE Riots

(VIDEO) UNHINGED Leftist Screams “Nazi B*tch” at Fox Reporter Covering Newark ICE Riots
May 27, 2026

A depraved anti-ICE rioter was seen screaming profanities at a Fox reporter while she was reporting live on the riots outside Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark, New Jersey, on Tuesday. 

While reporting on the crazed anti-ICE rioters, Fox News correspondent Alexis McAdams approached the woman, saying on camera, “We have people like this. You are a protester who’s been out here, and you have a dirty mouth.”

As McAdams was speaking, the crazed liberal said repeatedly, “You’re a f*cking b*tch.”

“So, that’s just what we deal with,” McAdams reported.

“Just for people who want to know what it’s like to cover these protests, it’s constant with this. This is what these people do. They want people who are in this country illegally to be released out onto the streets,” she continued as the woman shouted at her on the side.

When McAdams turned her microphone toward the woman, she screamed, “Nazi b*tch! That’s what you are!” before pointing at the camera and yelling “Nazi b*tch” again.

Meanwhile, on the left frame of the screen, an obese woman could be seen nearby screaming in the ICE agents’ faces as bystanders filmed.

WATCH:

As The Gateway Pundit reported, rioters occupied the New Jersey ICE facility this week and were seen setting up barricades to block vehicles leaving the facility.

Instead of spending Memorial Day honoring our fallen troops, Kim joined the rioters attacking law enforcement alongside New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill, Senator Andy Kim, and Reps. Rob Menendez, LaMonica McIver and Nellie Pou.

Senator Kim apparently came into contact with a chemical irritant deployed by ICE to disperse the crowds, and he was seen washing his eyes out during the chaos.

(VIDEO) Democrat Senator Andy Kim Pepper Sprayed by ICE During Memorial Day Riot at ICE Facility

The post (VIDEO) UNHINGED Leftist Screams “Nazi B*tch” at Fox Reporter Covering Newark ICE Riots appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jordan Conradson

Justice Clarence Thomas Blasts Supreme Court For Refusing To Hear Florida’s Lawsuit Against Blue States Issuing  Driver’s Licenses To Illegal Alien Truckers

Justice Clarence Thomas Blasts Supreme Court For Refusing To Hear Florida’s Lawsuit Against Blue States Issuing Driver’s Licenses To Illegal Alien Truckers

Justice Clarence Thomas Blasts Supreme Court For Refusing To Hear Florida’s Lawsuit Against Blue States Issuing Driver’s Licenses To Illegal Alien Truckers
May 27, 2026

A man in a suit speaks at a podium with flags in the background during a formal event.

Justice Clarence Thomas delivered a scathing dissent Tuesday as the Supreme Court refused to let Florida sue California and Washington over their lawless practice of handing out commercial driver’s licenses to illegal aliens who cannot read English road signs.

The Court denied Florida’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint in the original jurisdiction case, leaving the state with “nowhere else to bring” its claims, Thomas wrote. He was joined by Justice Samuel Alito.

Read more:

SCOTUS Sides With Blue States, Rejects Florida Challenge Over Issuing Driver’s Licenses to Illegal Aliens

This decision comes after the horrific August 12, 2025, crash on the Florida Turnpike. Illegal alien Harjinder Singh, an Indian national who entered the U.S. illegally through the Mexican border, obtained CDLs from both California and Washington despite failing English proficiency tests at least ten times in Washington and once in California.

Singh approached a clearly marked “no U-turn” sign for official use only, ignored it, and swung his massive tractor-trailer across both lanes of the highway. The trailer crushed a minivan traveling behind him. All three passengers in the minivan were killed.

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration testing after the crash confirmed Singh could not correctly answer most verbal questions and identified only one out of four highway signs.

Thomas did not mince words:

“An illegal alien who cannot read English road signs cannot drive an 80,000-pound tractor-trailer.”

Federal law and regulations require states to ensure CDL applicants pass a driver’s test, sufficiently understand English, and demonstrate appropriate immigration status. California and Washington defied those rules.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier brought the original jurisdiction suit arguing the blue states’ sanctuary policies and refusal to check immigration status or English proficiency created a public nuisance and violated federal preemption. Iowa and 16 other states backed Florida’s effort.

The Supreme Court turned it down without comment.

Thomas blasted the abdication:

“This Court declines to even hear Florida’s claims, even though it has nowhere else to bring them.”

He reiterated that the Constitution gives the Supreme Court exclusive original jurisdiction over controversies between states — and that the Court has no business inventing discretion to dodge these cases. If states cannot bring these disputes here, they have no judicial forum at all.

Fox News reported:

Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, said the Supreme Court had a constitutional obligation to hear the dispute because lawsuits between states can only be brought before the high court.

"If this Court does not exercise jurisdiction over a controversy between two States, then the complaining State has no judicial forum in which to seek relief," Thomas wrote.

Thomas argued that Florida’s allegations against Washington and California were serious because failing to follow federal commercial licensing laws can create dangerous road conditions and, he said, has contributed to deadly crashes.

Thomas pointed to the fatal Florida highway crash involving truck driver Harjinder Singh, who he said "could not read the road signs," and argued Florida deserved a chance to pursue its claims.

[...]

"We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given," Thomas wrote.

Thomas accused the Supreme Court of failing to abide by the Constitution when it declines to hear disputes between states.

The post Justice Clarence Thomas Blasts Supreme Court For Refusing To Hear Florida’s Lawsuit Against Blue States Issuing Driver’s Licenses To Illegal Alien Truckers appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft