TRADE OVER WAR: Turkish Leader Erdogan Tells Ukraine’s Zelensky That Black Sea Attacks Are ‘Inexplicable’
September 24, 2026
Erdogan speaks out against Black Sea vessel strikes
Erdogan does not mince his words.
Whether we like him or not, there’s no denying the fact that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is completely removed from the Western Globalist narratives that shape so many ‘leaders.’
Who else would walk up to the podium in the General Assembly of the United Nations and fire from all cylinders against ‘global gender-neutralization policies’ and say that they had turned into ‘a campaign targeting families and children’?
When it comes to the Russian ‘phobia’ affecting most of European Globalist elites, Erdogan is also not partaking, having maintained good relations with both Moscow and Kiev during these 5 years of war.
In fact, Erdogan very nearly ended the Ukraine conflict back in 2022, when Istanbul negotiations were about to finish the bloodiest war in Europe since WW2 right after it started – before then-UK PM Boris Johnson stepped in to keep Volodymyr Zelensky from signing the deal.
“Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan told Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky that attacks by Russia and Ukraine on commercial vessels in the Black Sea were inexplicable and steps must be taken to stop these, according to a readout from his office on Thursday.
‘During the meeting, President Erdogan stated that Turkey was ready to do all it can for the Ukraine-Russia war to end with lasting peace, that we will continue our efforts to revive direct negotiations’, the Turkish presidency said in a statement.
‘Our President stated that a step must be taken regarding navigational safety in the Black Sea, that attacks on commercial vessels are inexplicable, and that we expect the sides to act responsibly’, it added.”
Texas Attorney Goes Viral After Being Allegedly Called Out by Judge for Wearing This ‘Inappropriate’ Dress to Court
September 24, 2026
Mariah Medina. Credit: @MMedinanews/X
A Texas attorney has gone viral this week after saying that a judge decided she was not dressed appropriately for the job.
As The New York Post reported, former San Antonio-based reporter Mariah Medina wrote on X on Monday that she was wearing a dress she had worn countless times, both at her old job and at other courts, without issue.
But Judge Yolanda Huff, who has been on the bench since 2019, had a different take. She deemed the attire “inappropriate,” which a confused Medina then tried to explain was a “shift dress.”
Medina’s post on the subject so far has garnered nearly 7 million views.
This is what I was wearing today when a judge said that I was inappropriately dressed for court.
It’s a dress I’ve worn on air countless times and a dress that I have worn to other courts without issue.
Medina also said Judge Huff further humiliated her by asking her to come around the bench in front of everyone to inspect her outfit. She then laughed and asked if she really thought the dress was appropriate.
She had me come around the bench so she could see my outfit… in front of defendants and other lawyers.
She laughed and asked if I really believed that my dress was appropriate for a jury trial… then asked me if I had a blazer in my car.
Didn’t they give you lessons on appropriate attire in law school? Most places do. Do you think it would be appropriate for a man to go to court in a tank top to defend his clients?
Retired lawyer. 42 years. Over 100 jury trials in state and federal courts. Dozens of oral arguments in state appellate courts and the 9th Circuit. The dress is fine. The judge was being petty. Publicly shaming you was way out of line.
The judge was out of line. There is nothing wrong with your dress. It covers everything. Next time, wear the tightest dress you own with the tiniest jacket type thing that makes your boots the center of attention. Some women don’t appreciate other women looking like women and…
You are inappropriately dressed for court. Put a jacket on. I’m a woman a year younger than you. And I interned for a judge. You wore it without issue because no one said anything, not because it was appropriate.
Abdul El-Sayed Continues to Refuse to Condemn IRGC’s Brutality as Young Iranian-American Confronts Him With Realities of What His Family Has Endured (Video)
September 24, 2026
Abdul el-Sayed during a recent interview on Fox News.
A young Iranian-American man confronted radical Muslim Communist Michigan US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed at an event at the University of Michigan.
The young man shared the reality of the brutal Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and what they have done to their own people.
He shared how his family has been hunted by the IRGC and the tens of thousands of protesters reportedly killed by the regime.
He asked El-Sayed to do one simple thing: condemn the IRGC.
El-Sayed refused.
The young man shared, “My cousin was hunted in the streets of Iran by the IRGC because her hijab wasn’t on right.”
“My uncle was sentenced to die, received 50 lashings by Ali Khamenei’s government. And the terror that we’ve experienced is insurmountable.”
“And you can imagine our surprise as Persians, our sadness when we heard you, Abdul, a leaked audio tape of you saying that you didn’t want to comment on Supreme Leader Khamenei’s death and that people in Dearborn were sad when he died.”
“There are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad today… I just don’t want to comment on Khamenei at all.”
He said he would pivot to calling Trump a “pedophile president” who started another war.
The young man continued, “And I just have a simple question, Abdul. That silence was— had a gaping hole in our community, and I want to ask if you regret that silence.”
“I want to ask if you renounce the people that held vigils, that supported this terrorist for all the stuff that he’s done. I wanted to ask if you stand unequivocally against the IRGC, against the Islamic Republic of Iran that has killed 50,000 protesters, Abdul. I haven’t heard anything from you about the protesters, Abdul. Please.”
El-Sayed responded, “I appreciate your question, and thank you. What I will tell you is this. For too long and too often, when we think about our role in the world, we have turned ourselves into the world’s policeman. And I think what we all want, what we all need, is more democracy, more freedom in the world, but also an understanding of what we actually can and should do with respect to that, and here’s my point: one can disagree with the governance of a foreign country. One can stand in solidarity with freedom and democracy movements.”
“But my worry is one when one decides that we are going to go in and take out the leadership of a foreign government because here’s what happens. A lot of times, that frustration gets used to justify corporate interests that have a real stake in the natural resources in a particular country. See what I mean? So when it comes down to it, I will always stand for and with democratic movements, always. But I also don’t believe that we were in the right to go to war to topple the government of Iran. It was not our responsibility to do it.”
“It is the responsibility of the people of Iran to decide what their leadership should look like. And so while I stand with freedom and democratic movements, I also worry that once you start putting our resources toward regime change in foreign countries, more often than not, the regimes that we seek to change are the ones in which there is a natural resource interest, and it becomes a ploy for the interests of our corporations. And that’s what I worry about. See what I mean?”
The young man pressed, “Abdul, you still haven’t said it though. We’re dying. Do you stand with us?”
El-Sayed responded, “And I will always stand. Like I told you, I will always stand with movements for freedom and democracy. But again, I want to be careful because how many times were we taken down a path to war that we could not get ourselves out of? Trillions of dollars in losses, sanctions that ended up hurting the people of those countries more than they ever hurt the leadership of those countries. And so what I’ll tell you is what I think you want to hear from me is to say, well, the US has a responsibility to be involved in regime change. And what I’ll tell you is the US has no— we should not be in the business of regime change. But I will always stand with movements for freedom and democracy.”
“You stand with our movement of freedom and democracy, ours, the Persians?” the young man asked again, attempting to get El-Sayed to come out against the Iranian regime’s brutality.
But El-Sayed simply could not do it.
He finished saying, “Again, I want freedom and democracy for the people of Iran. No question. But I want that to be done by the people of Iran coming together as a community to decide how to create democratic change in their society. So I really appreciate your question. I appreciate your passion. And I’m grateful for the, for the question that you asked.”
Watch:
Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed responds to a visibly upset Iranian-American student at the University of Michigan, telling him that U.S. military interventions, sanctions, and regime-change wars often advance corporate interests and harm civilians, rather than promote… pic.twitter.com/NwUlCJQVsP
Florida AG Demands Firing of History Teacher After She Targeted Conservative 8th Grader, Tried to Get Him ‘Cancelled’
September 24, 2026
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has told Sarasota County Schools to fire Pine View history teacher Liz Ballard and revoke her educator certificate over reports that she harassed an eighth-grade boy over conservative views, used him as the class punching bag after his parents told her to stop, called him a “misogynist,” spread rumors around campus, and disparaged his father.
Pine View is the public magnet for gifted students in Osprey.
Uthmeier’s Office of Parental Rights wrote in a letter on Monday that Ballard “routinely discusses political topics” and that the student told her his parents “expressly forbid” him from those debates.
The letter states Ballard “harassed, disparaged and deliberately tried to ‘cancel’ an eighth-grade student for his conservative views.”
I sent a letter to Sarasota Schools after a Pine View teacher allegedly labeled an 8th grader a “misogynist” based on his political affiliation, ignored his parents’ wishes, and disparaged the child’s father.
Despite the parents’ request, Ballard allegedly kept putting him up as “the conservative perspective in the classroom,” the letter says, and “pressured him to defend political positions on demand in front of his classmates.”
Uthmeier says that Ballard called the boy a misogynist, “spread this label around the school, and openly questioned the suitability and influence of the student’s father.”
He called the targeted harassment “the reputational destruction of a child” and said it would violate Florida law, board policy, and at least six principles of professional conduct.
Multiple parents had already opened HR files on her, Uthmeier wrote.
“If true, she should be fired and never teach in Florida again,” he posted.
The district has until Oct. 1 to tell him what it has done or will do.
Jason Means, president of the Sarasota Classified Teachers Association, is defending the leftist teacher in the media but has not confirmed whether the union will formally defend her during the investigation.
“She’s a great teacher at a great school; Pine View’s a great school,” Means told WFLA. “He might have, you know, overstepped his bounds a little bit. I mean, obviously it’s within the laws of the state of Florida, and I can see where he would say that he would have the right to send such a letter. I feel like he might have bigger fish to fry.”
Rep. Brandon Gill Mic-Drops on Anchor Baby Dem Congresswoman With Perfect Response After She Introduces Bill to Abolish ICE and Proclaims ” Latina Power”
September 24, 2026
Reps. Brandon Gill (R-TX) and Delia Ramirez (D-IL). Credit: Official House Portraits/Public Domain
Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) proved once again why he is one of the GOP’s most effective communicators yesterday after burying a self-described anchor baby Democrat congressman who wants to destroy immigration enforcement completely.
As CBS reported, Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) boasted on Wednesday that she is introducing legislation that will abolish U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and dismantle the Department of Homeland Security.
The funds will be redirected to more social services.
Gill, understandably, was not pleased to hear this. But he took the opportunity to promote his commonsense piece of legislation, which would bring an end to birthright citizenship for the children of illegals once and for all.
.@RepDeliaRamirez shows exactly why it’s time to end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens: it can empower those with no loyalty to America to dismantle it from within.
Ramierez, whose parents crossed the border illegally from Guatemala while her mom was pregnant with her, responded by mocking Gill on X, him that his bill was “unconstitutional,” and proclaiming “Latina power.”
Gill refused to let that disgusting remark slide and delivered an absolutely epic reply. He first made clear that the only thing that matters is AMERICAN power, not “Latina Power.”
Gill then RIPPED Ramirez’s parents for breaking immigration law and correctly pointed out how ungrateful she was for not appreciating the fact that she is a U.S. citizen thanks to a legal loophole.
“I believe in American Power— which means being able to control who comes into our country and that the golden ticket of citizenship should belong to Americans first and Americans only,” Gill wrote on X.
“Your parents were illegal aliens who showed no regard for our nation or its laws when they came here,” he wrote. “You should be beyond grateful that a legal loophole allowed you to enjoy the fruits of a first-world nation.”
“Instead, you’re working to end immigration enforcement– telling actual Americans that their birthright doesn’t belong to them and that our nation and its culture have no meaning or value to you,” he continued.
“You have no love or appreciation for America because, at the end of the day, you still proudly consider yourself a Guatemalan before you are a citizen of America.”
I believe in American Power— which means being able to control who comes into our country and that the golden ticket of citizenship should belong to Americans first and Americans only.
Your parents were illegal aliens who showed no regard for our nation or its laws when they… https://t.co/HcGngXR37w
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
