Former White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt recently appeared on the Sean Hannity podcast and spent part of the time explaining how the media spreads fake news narratives.

She has spent a lot of time interacting with the media and obviously knows that she’s talking about.

Leavitt described how some outlets will take one negative thing and then construct an entire story around it. She also talked about how news outlets sometimes lie through omission. It’s a very informative discussion.

Partial transcript by Red Wave Press:

Sean Hannity: “How much of what people read or hear or view on television would you describe as being complete, bogus, not true, lies, fake?”

Karoline Leavitt: The vast majority of it… Because it all has an opinion, or all these headlines are driven by the opinion of a source… perfect example… Politico had an article about how the headline was, ‘The vibes around Trump’s convention and the GOP suck.’ And I’m like, ‘Who said that?’ Like, did the president say that to them? You know? And it’s like a source way at the bottom of the page. And they’ve described the source as like a Republican lobbyist.”

“I’m like, so you have one Republican lobbyist and screw him for being a coward and not putting his name on this quote, saying the vibes sucked and that’s the headline in Politico. For those of us who were in the room, you were there. It was exciting. It was fun. The crowd was, you know, loving it. So that’s how things get written. They just seek to get a bad narrative and they’ll find anyone who helps them push that narrative. And the other thing, if I may, the bias of omission is the most dangerous. You can see I get all fired up about this stuff. What you don’t see in the news. I watched CNN when I was in my job. I watched it all day, every day.”

“But what you don’t hear. You know, the president would sign amazing executive orders or give great speeches that they don’t even cover. They don’t even mention that the president of the United States did this or that on any given day.

Watch the clip below:

Former White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt just laid it out plainly: the vast majority of legacy media “reporting” is FAKE NEWS.

Sean Hannity: “How much of what people read or hear or view on television would you describe as being complete, bogus, not true, lies, fake?”… pic.twitter.com/Omz0wEkVmj

— RedWave Press (@RedWavePress) September 23, 2026

Leavitt did such a great job.

It will be difficult to replace her.

The post Karoline Leavitt Explains How the Liberal Media Pushes Fake News Narratives (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Where in the world is Ronald Morales?!

Please help attorney David Wilson find him. Ronald Morales is from Venezuela, and is a critical witness to testify at deposition and trial in the Eric Coomer v. Joe Oltmann case, 20-34319.

Attorneys for Joe Oltmann have looked high and low for Morales, also known as “Ronny Valles” and “Ronald Santiago Morales Valles.”

Dominion and Coomer have asserted for years that there is no remote access to the voting systems, and they have nothing to do with Venezuela.

However, Morales is on emails with Venezuela and Smartmatic/Sequoia in 2007 where the steps for the RAS, Remote Access Server, are shared.

Morales joined Smartmatic around 2004 and worked on Election Management System (EMS) quality assurance in Venezuela. After Smartmatic acquired Sequoia Voting Systems, he worked on integrating Smartmatic equipment with Sequoia’s EMS. He later became a senior systems manager at Dominion.

A set of August 2007 emails circulated on sites such as Election Crime Bureau shows Fernando Hernández of Smartmatic Labs in Venezuela writing to Ronald Morales (then at Sequoia) with the subject “RAS Server.” The message lists hardware and software needed to set up a Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) server. Follow-up emails discuss configuration and mention a RAS server and “HAAT Listener” intended for use in Wisconsin.

• August 2, 2007: A Sequoia employee sought clarification from Fernando Hernández on the final step of his instructions, asking directly: “Thanks for the information. I have a question, how do I complete number 4?”. This indicates a need for more detailed guidance on configuring the RRAS service.
• August 2, 2007: Hernández’s response was brief and deferred to local expertise: “Sorry, I don’t know,” he replied, adding, “For sure, the new IT guy working here in the Denver office will know.”
• August 6, 2007: On this day, the same Sequoia Quality Assurance Analyst was engaged in multiple, parallel conversations that shed light on the project. In an email to a colleague primarily discussing challenges with a separate “reporting tool,” the analyst revealed the server’s intended destination, stating, “…all I know to work on is trying to prepare machines for the HAAT Listener and the RAS Server we need for Wisconsin.” He underscored the significance of the task, noting, “That’s going to be a major project.”
• August 6, 2007: In a separate email sent just over an hour later to another colleague, the same analyst discussed hardware and software requirements. After noting, “It looks like a D610 laptop or comparable will work for both the HAAT Listener and RAS servers,” he inquired about a different operating system than the one specified by Hernández: “Do we have or can we get SUSE Linux 9.3?”  This exploration of an alternative operating system is typical of a project’s early stages but also shows that the initial specifications from Smartmatic were not being treated as immutable directives.

It turns out that Dominion did keep one of the original Venezuelan’s from Smartmatic/Sequoia, and they may have kept him because he is the key player in understanding remote access.

A virtual machine is certainly handy if you have remote access.

Eric Coomer conceded that a VPN was set up in Chicago for “emergency use” but Coomer did not recall using the VPN access.

This is a stark contrast from Coomer’s 2022 testimony before a grand jury to attempt to indict President Trump. When a grand juror asked Coomer if he “rigged the 2020 election” Coomer said he did not have access to do so.

David Wilson needs clarification from Ronald Morales under oath on these issues. If you know of Morales’ whereabouts, please contact David Wilson at david@dradvocates.com.

The post Where Is Ronald Morales? One Diligent Attorney Wants to Know appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

An innocent Florida father is under attack by left-wing activists and local agitators after stepping in to defend his son from a violent bully at a school bus stop in Indiantown.

Despite law enforcement confirming that the father acted completely within the law to protect himself and his child, outraged activists, including local branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), are demanding that the father be locked up for assault with a deadly weapon.

According to Martin County Sheriff John Budensiek, the dispute began Thursday, September 17, on a Martin County school bus headed toward South Fork High School, WPBF reported.

A 16-year-old boy boarded with a pizza. A 14-year-old got on after him, demanded a piece, threatened him, and then smacked him in the head when the older boy would not hand it over.

The 16-year-old did what parents tell their kids to do. He went home and told his father.

That afternoon, the father went to the bus stop and spoke with the driver. She said she would try to handle it.

Friday morning, the father drove his son to the stop himself. The 14-year-old was already on the bus. As the boy boarded, the father again spoke with the driver, and the 14-year-old got off the bus to confront a grown man.

Other students started calling people to the scene. A 16-year-old who had been suspended from school showed up. Sheriff Budensiek said the two teens “look like grown men” as they walked up on the father, yelling.

The father put his hand up and told them to stay back.

“They got all the way up on him before he pulled out a concealed weapon and told them get back, which he’s legally allowed to do,” Budensiek said. “He’s legally allowed to stand his ground.”

The teens backed off. Not a shot was fired.

The father put the gun away, drove around the corner, flagged down a deputy, and reported the encounter himself. Detectives interviewed students on the bus and the people involved.

The sheriff said they got a consistent story. He also said investigators would have sought warrants on the 14-year-old and the 16-year-old who went after the dad, except the father declined to press charges.

Martin County Sheriff John Budensiek made it clear during a press briefing that the father committed no crime and acted entirely within his constitutional rights under Florida law, according to WPFB.

“To recap it, the individual with the gun was the victim in this case,” Budensiek said. “He just wants to be left alone. He wants his son to be left alone.”

“You are allowed to stand your ground whether the person coming after you is 16 or 24 or 34… He’s legally allowed to stand his ground.”

The boy has since been pulled from the school and is being homeschooled. The father, according to the sheriff, is a security guard who was wearing a badge and was legally carrying.

WPFB reported:

The two students involved, Trevor Ivory and RJ McIntyre, shared their perspective on the incident.

“I feel like under any circumstance, however you felt, no firearms should be displayed at a bus stop where there’s a bunch of kids on a bus looking forward to going to school,” Ivory said. “Instead, they had to see a man with a gun on two teenagers that they know ride the bus in the morning.”

The confrontation was a key topic during an NAACP community meeting held Tuesday night. The two students and their families attended the meeting, where emotions ran high.

“The dad had a thousand options. He chose the wrong option,” said Pam Ivory, Trevor’s aunt.

Jimmy Smith, president of the NAACP Martin County Branch, also addressed the situation.

“We know guns aren’t allowed on school property. They also shouldn’t be allowed in school bus stops,” Smith said.

Smith added that he plans to meet with the school board and the sheriff to discuss the incident further.

“We shouldn’t be pointing a gun at our children,” he said.

WATCH:

The post Florida Dad Legally Pulls Gun and Protects His Son From Two Bullies at Bus Stop — Now NAACP Wants Him ‘Jailed’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The lone holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial is pushing back after Clancy’s defense asked a judge to investigate his conduct and obtain cellphone records from the jury’s deliberations.

Edward Paltzik, attorney for juror Michael Desronvil, blasted the motion as “Looney Tunes” and a “full-frontal attack on the U.S. Constitution.” He warned that investigating jurors for standing by their views could threaten the independence of jury deliberations, CT Insider reported.

Below is the full statement from Paltzik:

“The Looney Tunes motion filed yesterday by Kevin “Shooter McGavin” Reddington to investigate Michael is not just an attack on Michael for being the courageous lone holdout juror. Reddington’s motion is actually a full-frontal attack on the U.S. Constitution. Because if the new normal is that jurors are going to face brutal reprisals for disagreeing with a defense attorney, you can kiss the Sixth Amendment goodbye.

To anyone who thinks that Reddington’s motion is OK, just remember that the tables will inevitably turn. Imagine a similar trial sometime in the not too distant future where it is the reverse scenario: 11-1 in favor of guilty, with one holdout favoring not guilty by reason of insanity. I doubt you folks would be alright if the District Attorney then filed a motion to investigate that lone holdout standing in the way of a conviction.

That’s why this is actually not a partisan issue. Really, this is a “do we still want to have a Sixth Amendment” issue. If you are like me and believe steadfastly in the Constitution, it’s easy to see how, regardless of your party affiliation, this is an absolutely terrible path of ruin Reddington wants to take us down.

If we follow his destructive proposal to its logical conclusion, we’re going to have an endless cycle of prosecutors investigating holdouts who oppose “guilty” and defense attorneys investigating holdouts who oppose “not guilty.” Pretty soon we’ll end up with with a retrograde justice system that will look a lot like the Hatfield-McCoy Feud: a cycle of carnage so malignant that its origins will fade in importance, replaced by the hopeless death spiral of the cycle itself.

Kevin Reddington’s disgusting motion to investigate Michael is worthy of nothing but universal condemnation. This is certainly not the final word from us on this subject, but merely our first words. It’s all going to backfire spectacularly on sore loser Reddington.”

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Kevin Reddington, Clancy’s attorney, asked Plymouth Superior Court Judge William Sullivan to investigate holdout juror Michael P. Desronvil, the same juror Reddington publicly smeared after the mistrial as a man with an “agenda” who “robbed” the other 11 jurors.

The filing, obtained by the New Haven Register, claims Desronvil may have given incomplete or inaccurate answers on jury questionnaires and during selection. It also asks the judge to dig into reported domestic-violence history and alleged cellphone use during deliberations.

Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, asked the court to examine whether Desronvil used his phone during deliberations and whether he answered jury-selection questions truthfully.

The motion also seeks cellphone records and other information about the juror. Phone use during deliberations is prohibited in Massachusetts, but the allegations have not been proven.

The jury deadlocked 11–1, and the judge declared a mistrial on September 4.

Eleven jurors reportedly supported finding Clancy not criminally responsible because of her mental condition; Desronvil maintained that the prosecution’s evidence showed she knew what she was doing.

Clancy admitted killing her three children, but the trial did not produce a verdict on her criminal responsibility.

Desronvil had already disputed other jurors’ accounts of deliberations. In a statement reported by NewsNation, he said he had no doubts and believed the evidence showed Clancy knew what she was doing.

The case is scheduled to return to court on September 29. Prosecutors have not announced whether they will seek a retrial.

The post Holdout Juror Fights Back After Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Seeks His Phone Records — Spokesperson Says OTHER Jurors Were on Phones and Posting During Deliberations appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Guest Post by Attorney Peter Tictin and Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.

We have developed a methodology that can provide indisputable proof, well before Election Day, that in the upcoming November midterm elections, the United States Postal Service (USPS) is in the process of delivering mail-in ballots to hundreds of thousands of illegal locations (i.e., addresses that are not domiciles of registered voters). The result will be enough fraudulent votes will be counted for the Democratic Party to gain a majority in the House and possibly in the Senate as well.

The detection methodology uses an AI computer model that compares time-series snapshots of state voter rolls with USPS “Change of Address” data and county property tax records to flag addresses that cannot legally house a voter. A continuously updated database of every parcel and structure drawn from roughly 3,200 county property rolls, integrated with building permit data, determines the USPS regularly delivers mail-in ballots to addresses not classified as a residential domicile (i.e., the address is a vacant building or an empty lot that has no bedroom facilities).

The computer model also demonstrates that the USPS regularly delivers mail-in ballots illegally to bulk-drop addresses, including local U.S. post office boxes, FedEx locations, UPS offices, and other “virtual mailbox locations.” These locations are anomalous voter registrations because they obviously are not residential addresses if they are receiving mail-in ballots in bunches. Instead, these virtual mailbox locations are ideal for illegal bulk drop-offs of mail-in ballots, designed to be picked up, filled out, and returned by locally operating NGOs.

If President Trump ordered the Department of Justice to prohibit the USPS from delivering ballots to addresses deemed “ineligible” by state law, he would stop the 2026 steal in its tracks. If a court tried to enjoin President Trump or the DOJ from doing so, that court would be complicit in allowing the USPS to deliver ballots illegally to addresses the state government defines as ineligible to receive ballots.

Applying the methodology to the Georgia presidential election in 2020 (see: https://rumble.com/v59qdot-who-won-georgia-2020-longer-fractal-video.html), we believe that thousands of mail-in ballots were sent to illegal addresses, including warehouses with no domiciled residents, various business locations, bulk mail addresses, and industrial facilities (e.g., a peanut farm with no residential facilities).

The conclusion is obvious: in detecting voter fraud, addresses are more important than voter ID. The voter ID may tell us that Bill and Sally are registered voters who live at 509 Elmont Street. The critical fault is that we have no information about the address. Addresses don’t move. Addresses don’t change their name. Addresses don’t have lawyers or rights. Addresses contain the most powerful unused data in election analysis.

Every address in America—in often granular detail—is reflected on official property tax rolls that are updated constantly because they are the tax base for the county. Property tax rolls do not reflect residents; they reflect address attributes—like an address with 21 registered voters with one bedroom, one bath, and 1,200 square feet of living space. An ineligible alien can cast one illegal ballot. An ineligible address can collect hundreds of loose ballots, with zero chain of custody—collected by NGOs and voted—and not for Republican candidates.

Posting poll watchers and DOJ attorneys at the voting place completely misses this steal. Once the envelope containing voter information, including address, is removed from the page with the vote, election officials will be unable to collect and disqualify mail-in ballots illegally cast. Because state officials conduct no outreach investigations to verify that mail-in ballots are delivered to, and voted on by, eligible registered voters, the mail-in ballots the USPS delivers to and receives from these anomalous locations are never revealed to be fraudulent.

The solution is simple, clear, inexpensive, and compelling—and the courts cannot intervene, at least not without looking preposterous. Compare the voter roll for each state with the property tax rolls for that state—and focus only on the urban areas. The voter roll tells you five registered voters reside at 330 Bridge Avenue. The property tax roll tells you 330 Bridge Avenue is a coffee shop with no bedrooms or other living accommodations. You just stopped five illegitimate votes from being cast.

Our research has proven that in 2024, the USPS delivered 250,000 mail-in ballots to illegal addresses in each of three states—Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia. In 2004, the USPS delivered mail-in ballots to over 1.25 million illegal addresses in each of two states—Pennsylvania and Texas —plus over 100,000 in Arizona and Nevada. Elections are often won by 17,000 to 25,000 ballots, yet nobody monitors addresses.

The point is that the fraud capable of swinging an election is detected by addresses, not by scrubbing voter registration files. Since it is a crime for the USPS to deliver and receive illegal ballots, the USPS must be stopped from aiding and abetting criminal mail-in ballot harvesting. Policing mail-in voting to prohibit the USPS from delivering mail-in ballots to illegal addresses has a better chance of avoiding politically motivated court challenges since addresses are unlikely to be deemed to have legal status, since addresses are not “persons” under the law. Addresses have no rights, no attorneys, no sob stories in the leftist press about someone not allowed to vote.

If radical leftist insurgents win the battle over the rules under which the 2026 midterm elections are conducted, we risk turning over the Republic to those determined to alter our Constitution beyond recognition. Stimulating turnout to create an election “too big to rig” will not work—not as long as the current mail-in ballot rules remain in place. With close elections decided by one or two percent differences, election fraudsters need only determine how many fraudulent mail-in ballots will be needed to steal the election. With the current mail-in ballot rules, the left is planning to make the 2026 midterm elections into a coup d’état. We will be watching a “Truman Show” psy-op with the population pre-conditioned to support a Democratic Party sweep by rigged polls that show voters willing to elect DSA-supported communis majorities in the House and Senate.

While the time is short, President Trump still has time to issue a National Security Emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA, 1976) to set election rules that will prevent election theft from foreign enemies as well as enemies within. Wayne Allyn Root is right: Every GOP candidate is about to become Spencer Pratt unless Trump acts.

Peter Ticktin, Esq., is a Senior Partner in The Ticktin Law Group in Deerfield Beach, Florida. He is the author of the 2020 book, What Makes Trump Tick: My Years with Donald Trump from New York Military Academy to the Present.  GodsFiveStones.com is a tax-deductible 501(c)3 foundation created by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., and Karladine Graves, M.D., managed by Capstone Legacy Foundation. As reported on GodsFiveStones.com, As reported on GodsFiveStones.com, Andrew Paquette, Ph.D., has discovered cryptographic algorithms in the State Board of Elections voter registration databases in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Florida, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. Dr. Paquette has argued that the algorithms permit the creation of millions of false voter records in the state boards of election that are yet given legitimate state Voter IDs for to facilitate clandestine mail-in voter fraud.

The post President Trump Has Time to Declare a National Security Emergency to Prevent Election Theft from Enemies Foreign and Domestic appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.