“Reuters (One of the Worst!) Reporter” – Trump Doubles Down Roasting Reporter Who He Told “Put Yourself in Shape. You Look Like Hell!””
October 31, 2026
Trump savages Reuters reporter questioning his health
President Trump on Saturday roasted Reuters reporter Jacob Bogage again, doubling down on his scathing rebuke of the overweight reporter who questioned Trump’s health during a press gaggle on Thursday.
Trump eviscerated Bogage after he suggested on Thursday that Trump canceled rallies in Iowa and Kansas this weekend because he’s “sick.” Bogage asked Trump if not going to Kansas has anything to do with him “being sick,” and Trump went off.
“Oh, you’re sick to ask that question. You are sick! Who are you with?” Trump fired back.
“Look at this guy. He’s way out of shape… He comes to me, ‘Sir, you’re not going to go to Kansas,’” Trump added.
“You’ve been following me for two weeks. I feel perfect! You are disgusting. Put yourself in shape. You look like hell!”
WATCH:
“Reuters (One of the Worst!) Reporter,” Trump wrote on Saturday, sharing an image of the reporter with the caption “Put yourself in shape. You look like hell!”
Trump trolls supersized Reuters reporter
Previously, the White House’s “Rapid Response 47” page trolled Bogage by posting photos of him eating junk food behind the wheel, writing, “Sloppy!”
Unhinged Knoxville Social Worker Demands City Remove Halloween Decoration Ghosts Because They Look Like ‘White Supremacist Lynching’
October 31, 2026
A Knoxville social worker named Elisabeth Spencer Pitts has publicly called on the city to take down white-sheet ghost decorations hanging from trees in downtown Market Square, arguing that the standard Halloween decor resembles a “white supremacist lynching.”
The ghosts form part of Knoxville’s official “Wicked Cool Halloween” decorations in the popular downtown square.
Independent journalist Andy Ngo highlighted her Facebook posts and images of the displays, noting that the last documented lynching in the United States occurred 45 years ago.
A leftist social worker in Knoxville, Tenn. named Elisabeth Spencer Pitts is pressuring the city council to take down its Halloween ghost decorations because she believes it looks like a white supremacist lynching.
The last documented American lynching was 45 years ago, but leftists continue to spread hoaxes that black s—icides and things that resemble knots and nooses are evidence of lynchings. https://t.co/eruxyD69G9
In a Facebook post complaining about the decorations, Pitts wrote:
Maybe I’m sensitive and possessed of a very flighty and prolific imagination, but this sh-t just ain’t copacetic in my humble opinion. The governance and daily operations of and by the Knoxville City Government are, by the most charitable estimations (I guess), simply tone deaf and incompetent- and in many cases just absolutely brutal in purpose and mechanism- but I feel like this Halloween aesthetic is exceptionally off the mark even for them. JFC can we just NOT hang anthropomorphic figures in trees in a downtown southern city right now?
While some commenters agreed with her, many also pointed out the absurdity of her complaint.
A man named JeMiale McKinney responded to her post, writing, “As a black dude, literally nah fam. Last documented lynching in the country was 1981. Last in Tennessee was 1944. Last documented gun homicide I could find in Knoxville was 2026 on Magnolia. The ghosts are white. The wires aren’t wrapped around their neck. Stuff like this paints Black people as perpetual victims who need shielding from any vague thing.”
@MrAndyNgo I had to go look! The comment section doesn’t disappoint!!
(God bless, JeMaile)
https://t.co/oV0qxKrJ5r https://t.co/IqaQO5iEKG
Pitts, listed in public records as a case manager/care coordinator in Knoxville, has also posted about transgender issues, including a March message wishing “Happy Trans Day of Visibility” and criticizing “transphobes.”
‘Coup’ at Poland’s Top Court: How President Nawrocki Forced His Way In After Tusk Attempted to Seize Control
October 31, 2026
Zack Masternak (public domain) · Number 10 / CC BY 2.0
Polish President Karol Nawrocki aborted a state visit to Senegal mid-flight on Friday and, by 1 a.m. Saturday, had pushed past police and a cordon of judges into Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal. Hours earlier, a judge elected by Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s parliamentary majority, one the president never swore in, had declared herself head of the court, suspended its president and vice president, and brought in riot police to secure the building. The court’s own leadership called it a coup d’état. It happened with Donald Tusk’s justice minister calling in the police and Tusk’s public blessing, and by the plain text of Poland’s Constitution, it was unlawful.
VIDEO: The chief justice’s side cuts through the chains on the Tribunal gate. Watch on X (NEXTA)
Riot police ringing a state institution, an unsworn judge proclaiming herself in charge, the ousted chief justice cutting through the chains on his own court’s gate: it reads like a dispatch from a coup in Africa, not from a NATO ally and EU member state in the heart of Europe.
What this would look like in America
Imagine the President is overseas when a judge, one whose appointment the President never finalized, walks into the Supreme Court and declares herself Chief Justice. She suspends the sitting Chief Justice and his deputy, and police called in by her and the Attorney General ring the building. The Chief Justice finds the gate chained shut, cuts his way onto his own court’s grounds, and is turned back by riot police. That same night, the Attorney General moves to strip the Chief Justice and his deputy of their immunity from prosecution, and hands the paperwork to the judge who just ousted them. The President flies home and has to push past her to get into the building.
Americans would call that a constitutional crisis. Tusk calls it “restoring the rule of law.” Poland’s Constitution says otherwise.
The president Poles chose
Nawrocki is no accidental head of state. Polish voters elected him directly in June 2025, defeating Tusk’s own hand-picked candidate, Warsaw mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, with 50.89% of the vote in the runoff. (CNN via Yahoo)
He is now Poland’s most trusted politician. In September’s CBOS poll, 53% of Poles said they trust him; only 37% said the same of Tusk. (Rzeczpospolita)
The head of state the Polish people elected, and still back, flew home to defend the court. The prime minister whom most Poles distrust stood behind the police who locked it down.
Friday night: the court is seized
On Friday evening, seven judges chosen by the current Sejm entered the Tribunal. Judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska announced that, as the longest-serving among them, she was now acting head of the court, and suspended Chief Justice Bogdan Święczkowski and his deputy, Bartłomiej Sochański, for one month. Police removed the court’s own security and deployed riot units, citing letters from Korwin-Piotrowska and from Prosecutor General Waldemar Żurek, who is also Tusk’s justice minister. (Notes from Poland, GB News)
That same evening, Żurek filed motions to strip Święczkowski and Sochański of their immunity from prosecution, and delivered them to the court’s “longest-serving judge”: Korwin-Piotrowska. (Notes from Poland)
Święczkowski arrived to find the gate chained shut behind a police cordon. PiS MP Mariusz Gosek went at the chain with bolt cutters, then a protester who said he was a locksmith cut through the fastening with a power tool, sparks flying, on Święczkowski’s orders. The chief justice walked up to the riot line holding his official ID and demanded to be let into his own court. Refused, he told the crowd they would not fight the police and promised to return with the president. (natemat.pl, Bankier.pl)
Hundreds of protesters gathered through the night, some chanting “Tusk traitor,” as Jarosław Kaczyński called it a coup against the Tribunal. Former Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro called it “a blatant, criminal attack on the constitutional order.” Police detained three people after demonstrators breached the fence. U.S. Ambassador Tom Rose called the events “very serious indeed.” (RTÉ, Yahoo News/AP, Fox News)
The president turns his plane around
Nawrocki was over southern Spain when the news broke. “At such a moment, the President must be in Poland,” he posted on X. Around 1 a.m., with Supreme Court First President Zbigniew Kapiński at his side, he arrived at the Tribunal escorting Sochański. Police barred his way but did not stop the head of state, and video shows him pushing past Korwin-Piotrowska and Judge Krystian Markiewicz at the door. (Anadolu, bne IntelliNews)
Inside, the cameras kept rolling. “We are judges of the Constitutional Tribunal,” Korwin-Piotrowska told him. “You are not judges of the Constitutional Tribunal,” Nawrocki answered.
Tusk’s camp tells it differently. Maciej Berek, a close Tusk ally also elected to the Tribunal, claimed the president “physically attacked” the judges, and Żurek called for prosecutors to examine his conduct. (Newsy Today, Saudi Gazette)
At dawn, Nawrocki declared that the constitutional order had been violated by “a forcible takeover of a constitutional body of the state.” He demanded that the forces the government had sent leave the Tribunal and summoned party leaders to emergency talks, citing a threat to Poland’s internal security. (Türkiye Today)
A judge the president never swore in
Under Article 4 of Poland’s Act on the Status of Constitutional Tribunal Judges, new judges must take their oath before the President. In March, the Sejm elected six. Nawrocki accepted two and refused four, Korwin-Piotrowska among them. Parliament swore them in at its own ceremony on April 9, which the president’s office says has no legal basis. (Greek City Times, Euronews)
You wouldn’t learn that from the Associated Press. AP reported only that the Tribunal’s website “announced the suspension” of the court’s president, as if the court itself had acted. It never says who issued the order, never names Korwin-Piotrowska, never mentions the refused oath, and leaves out the Tribunal’s statement that its website had been seized. What AP does give readers is the government’s claim that Święczkowski “repeatedly broke the law,” with no specifics and no mention that no court has found him guilty of anything. (Yahoo News/AP)
Why the court matters to the presidency
Whoever controls the Tribunal referees every clash between the president and the government, from vetoes to pardons to appointments. It settles disputes over powers between the state’s constitutional bodies. (Constitution, Article 189)
It also holds a key to the presidency itself. Under Article 131 of the Constitution, if the president cannot notify the Speaker of the Sejm that he is unable to serve, the Tribunal, at the Speaker’s request, decides whether he is impeded, and the Speaker takes over his duties. The Speaker is a member of Tusk’s coalition. (Adam Mickiewicz University)
PiS MEP Dominik Tarczyński argues in a video circulating on X that the coalition also wants a friendly court to clear the way for replacing the złoty with the euro, a change that would require amending the Constitution. (Brussels Signal)
A familiar playbook
Tusk has done this before. He promised on the campaign trail to dismantle state television and said public media in its current form did not deserve taxpayer money. (Financial Times via Today in the Markets) Within days of taking office in December 2023, his Culture Minister, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, fired the leadership of public broadcaster TVP, Polish Radio and the PAP news agency and installed new management the same day. TVP Info went dark minutes later, and Tusk’s Civic Platform celebrated on X: “The end of TVPiS.” (TVN24)
Dozens of reporters were fired, and when President Andrzej Duda vetoed the funding, the government put the broadcasters into liquidation to keep its managers in place. Morawiecki and Kaczyński called that a coup, too. (NPR/GPB, Notes from Poland)
Tusk is breaking Poland’s Constitution
Tusk defended Friday’s move on X, saying that after years of PiS lawlessness, restoring the rule of law requires decisive action. “There is no other way,” he wrote. In August he had promised to restaff the court, admitting his methods might not be to everyone’s liking. (Yahoo News/AP, Washington Times/AP)
That defense collapses the moment you open Poland’s Constitution. Tusk is not restoring the rule of law. He is breaking it, on four counts.
The Tribunal’s leadership is the President’s to appoint. Article 194 gives the President of the Republic the power to appoint the Tribunal’s president and vice president. It gives no single judge the power to depose them, least of all a judge the head of state never swore in. (Constitution, Chapter VIII)
The oath is the law. Statute requires new Tribunal judges to swear their oath before the President, and parliament cannot rewrite that by staging its own ceremony. Even Poland’s human rights commissioner, Marcin Wiącek, no PiS loyalist, has said the law requires the president to swear in Tribunal judges. (Notes from Poland)
The Tribunal’s rulings are binding. Article 190 makes its judgments final and universally binding, and requires them to be published immediately. Tusk’s government has refused to publish them since 2024, including the ruling that the president is under no obligation to swear in parliament’s picks. (Notes from Poland, Parapolitika)
The government must act within the law. Article 7 binds every public authority to act on the basis of and within the limits of the law. A government that disagrees with a court can legislate or wait for terms to expire. It cannot send riot police to install its own leadership.
Tusk’s camp leans heavily on an opinion from the Venice Commission, an advisory body in Strasbourg that says the president’s role in the oath should be ceremonial. (Euronews) Its opinions bind no one in Poland; the Polish Constitution does. By that text, what happened on Friday night was not a restoration of the rule of law. It was a government seizing a court it could not lawfully control, and Donald Tusk owns every step of it: the judges his majority installed without the president’s oath, the police his justice minister summoned, and the takeover he defended within hours.
Nawrocki’s emergency talks with party leaders began Saturday afternoon, and the first through the door came from Tusk’s own coalition: Deputy Prime Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz and Szymon Hołownia, who said the court needed fixing but force was the wrong way to do it. (TVN24, Goniec)
The talks were still underway at the time of publication. For now, Poland has two rival groups each claiming to be its highest court, police holding the building, and a year until the parliamentary elections that will decide who keeps it.
Evil in Our Midst: Twisted Group Proudly Displays Pro-Abortion Artist’s Satanic Statue Outside Southside St. Louis City Office
October 31, 2026
Shahzia Sikander’s sculpture “Witness” is on display in Madison Square Park as part of her multimedia exhibition “Havah…to breathe, air, life” on February 7, 2023, in New York City. – Pakistani-American artist Shahzia Sikander, whose statues “NOW” and “Witness” stand majestically on the ledge of a neoclassical New York Supreme Court building and in the adjoining Madison Park in Manhattan, wants to raise awareness about the low artistic representation of women in public space and the political, social and economic discrimination they face. (Getty Images)
They are evil and don’t even hide it anymore.
And, this is in St. Louis City in red state Missouri. The traveling statue was previously displayed in New York and Houston.
The “Witness” statue in St. Louis is an 18‑foot golden sculpture by Pakistani-American artist Shahzia Sikander.
The statue was installed at Rung for Women in the Fox Park neighborhood of south St. Louis. It depicts a levitating female figure with braided ram‑horn‑like hair, root‑like arms, and a collar referencing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway had this to say about the satanic statue going up in St. Louis between two statues.
Ivan Raiklin Joins Feds For Freedom To Oppose A SHAM Lawsuit Against Him – (VIDEO)
October 31, 2026
The non-profit organization, Feds For Freedom (FFF) hosted a press conference during an important hearing for a frivolous lawsuit against Prominent J6 activist, Ivan Raiklin, who was in attendance.
Five years later we are still demanding accountability.
Back in July, Raiklin submitted a request to the DOJ to investigate the Department of Defense for these mandates that threatened the freedoms and liberties of our servicemen and women. Months later we are still waiting for a
Executive Director of FFF, Stephanie Weidle opened up the press conference and told the viewers some information on FFF.
“Feds For Freedom was founded in September, 2021, when employees, contractors, and military service members faced sweeping vaccination mandates that threatened their careers, their livelihoods, and their bodily autonomy,” Weidle told the viewers.
“Since our founding we’ve supported whistleblowers, pursued administrative and legal remedies, challenged adverse personal actions, and worked to preserve evidence of misconduct.”
Weidle then brought up the case, which is known as Adirim v. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency et al.
Dr. Terry Adirim, a doctor and former director of the CIA’s Center for Global Health Services sued Raiklin and CIA, Director John Ratcliffe for alleged “violations of due process, privacy rights, breach of employment contract, and common law/constitutional violations tied to political targeting.”
Adirim filed this lawsuit shortly after being terminated from her position.
“So what is this lawsuit about? In the Spring of 2025, Dr. Terry Adirim was terminated from her position at the CIA. A position she had been placed in just a few months before. She then filed suit including claims of defamation arising from public statements by retired Lt. Colonel, Ivan Raiklin, regarding her role in the Department of Defense’s COVID-19 vaccination policy,” Weidle continued.
“Most of her claims were dismissed early on. What remains includes a defamation claim against Ivan Raiklin. The case proceeded to discovery in August 2026, including her deposition under oath. This lawsuit is significant for a simple reason, Dr. Adirim, the first Department of Defense official to be questioned under oath regarding her role and the implementation of the military COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Feds for Freedom is supporting the defense in pursuit of accountability.”
This case “opens a door that had previously seemed closed.”
Press Conference: Adirim’s Memo Under the Microscope https://t.co/XMaeCbYUfc
Weidle also took the opportunity to bring up the injustices that service members faced during the military vaccine mandates, including vaccine injuries and fatalities.
“A sharp rise in recorded illness and injury across that period. The Department has explained away those figures as a ‘database error,’ yet nobody outside the Department had been permitted to audit them,” Weidle continued.
“On behalf of React-19, on behalf of his mother Korina, I want to tell you about Jeremiah Kruntorad and his army National Guard platoon. Jeremiah was a calvary scout. He left for basic training in January 2021 and grew close to his platoon of fifty. They received the COVID-19 shots in May of 2021. His friend Lindy was paralyzed for eight months after her second dose and has been fighting for her life since.”
“Two other friends committed suicide within six months. Jeremiah took his own life two years later with no prior mental health history. He and at least one other friend died after receiving the same two pfizer batches. Both are recorded as military deaths in the vaccine adverse event reporting system.
Out of fifty service members in the platoon, three took their lives, which accounts for six percent of the platoon.
Physician and biochemist, Robert W Malone then took the stage:
Thanks for being a fighter for the truth and exposing the Covid Cartel, @RWMaloneMD !
“I am honored to stand here in support of both Ivan and the Feds for Freedom organization. I support a full accounting of the military COVID-19 vaccination mandate and the decisions implemented. Ivan Raiklin has publicly identified Dr. Terry Adirim’s September 14th 2021 memorandum as the instrument that treated the pfizer biotech emergency authorization product as interchangeable with the license comirnaty product and directed it’s use to carry out the mandate,” Malone told the viewers.
Malone highlighted Raiklin’s work in bringing to the public light these corrupt actions of Adirim during her reign in power.
Raiklin publicly identified Adirim’s military vaccine mandate memo as unlawful and in retaliation she initiated the lawsuit against him. Is Raiklin the one being politically targeted here?
Following the press conference, Raiklin took questions from the audience:
Q&A after today’s summary judgment hearing in Terry Adirim v. CIA et al. https://t.co/x02wCapo4M
While Raiklin continues to seek justice for those negatively affected during the COVID-19 era, the Deep State continues to deflect and paint him out to be the villain in this situation in order to avoid accountability for their own actions.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
(@alexbruesewitz) October 29, 2026
