Gavin Newsom’s Wife Turns Into a Stuttering Mess When Asked if the Investigation of Her Husband Actually Started Under Biden (VIDEO)
July 17, 2026
Screencap of Twitter/X video.
Gavin Newsom’s wife Jennifer Siebel Newsom recently appeared on MNOW and things got a little tricky for her when the host asked her if the federal investigation of her husband actually began under President Joe Biden, which it did.
Suddenly, there was a lot of uh… uhh… uhh… happening on the screen.
She quickly tried to pivot to Trump, but it just didn’t work. It came off as rather awkward.
Jennifer Siebel Newsom calls DOJ probe ‘fishing expedition’ in awkward interview
Jennifer Siebel Newsom, wife of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, called the investigation targeting the couple a “fishing expedition” in an awkward interview Friday — her first extended comments on the subject since the Democratic governor dropped news in June of a bombshell federal probe.
At one point, the feminist filmmaker seemed flustered when asked directly by MS Now anchor Stephanie Ruhle if the investigation actually started under former Democratic President Joe Biden, as some sources have alleged.
Both the governor, who is considering a run for president in 2028, and wife have stuck to their claims the probe is politically motivated by Republican President Donald Trump.
“I don’t know the details,” Siebel Newsom said after a pause.
She then tried to explain the timeline.
“I do know that Trump was coming after my husband when…back when Biden was president and Biden was running for the presidency.”
Watch the clip below:
Gavin Newsom’s wife stumbles when asked why she is lying about the DOJ investigation:
MSNOW: Didn’t this investigation start under Biden?
The fact that Ms. Siebel Newsom was asked about this on MSNOW is very telling. Maybe the far left is not as excited about the idea of a Newsom presidential run as Newsom is.
In fact, one of the other questions she got was whether or not her husband is planning to run. She couldn’t give a straight answer on that either. Watch:
Jennifer Newsom rambles for 90 seconds when asked if her husband will run for President:
“Um…I believe right now we are focused on California…I’ve been focused on women and children and communities…it’s really exciting to be in California, diversity is our secret sauce.” pic.twitter.com/HNAG7RmXcC
National Public Radio Suggests Banning Trans Surgery for Minors Sets a ‘Dangerous Precedent’
July 17, 2026
National Public Radio (NPR) recently did a story about how the Trump administration is cracking down on the use of Medicaid and Medicare for so-called ‘gender affirming care’ especially with regards to children.
This is another 80/20 issue that the vast majority of the public supports, it might even be 90/10. Most people do not believe that children should be involved in any of this. We don’t allow children to get tattoos, why would we allow them to get irreversible (and unnecessary) surgery that will affect them for the rest of their lives.
Despite public outcry, Democrats and the left in general, have made it clear that they simply will not let go of this issue.
Touted as an exclusive story on National Public Radio from health reporter Selena Simmons-Duffin, “Trump’s HHS abandons threat to withhold Medicare and Medicaid funding over trans care” dutifully repeated the “gender-affirming care for youth” misnomer in the lead while providing only trans-supportive sources.
The Trump administration is abandoning its most aggressive attempt to end gender-affirming care for youth nationally, according to an official document obtained by NPR.
The document shows that the Department of Health and Human Services will not be finalizing a proposed rule that would have blocked all Medicaid and Medicare funding for hospitals that provide pediatric gender-affirming care…
The broadcast version that aired on NPR’s All Things Considered Monday added a “dangerous” adjective to the mix.
Simmons-Duffin: ….The American Medical Association and the Children’s Hospital Association both urged the government to withdraw it. They said it violated several laws and set a dangerous precedent….
This is exactly why for years now, conservatives have been calling for the defunding of NPR.
They present every issue through the lens of the far left and pretend that it’s the rational, reasonable, and normal position.
Protecting children is the reasonable position. There is nothing dangerous about that.
Former CNN Employee Don Lemon Claims People Keep Asking Him if He is Running for President (VIDEO)
July 17, 2026
Screencap of Twitter/X video.
Don Lemon, who couldn’t even hold on to his job at CNN, was recently asked if he has political ambitions and he claimed that lots of people keep asking him if he is running for president.
He then goes on to say that he thinks he would make a good president. He sure has a highly developed sense of self-importance, doesn’t he?
Wouldn’t it be worth it just to see other Democrats demolish him on a debate stage?
Don Lemon reveals he’s ‘totally serious’ about considering a presidential run
Former CNN host Don Lemon revealed he was “totally serious” about considering a presidential run during a podcast on Wednesday and said people kept asking him if he’s going to run.
“Can’t be Censored” hosts Travis Dhanraj and Karman Wong asked Lemon if he had political ambition, to which the ex-CNN host said no, but revealed people had been asking him to and that he was thinking about it.
“I actually think I would be a really good president of the United States,” Lemon said.
“Okay, like you’re being serious?” Dhanraj asked.
Lemon said he was being totally serious and was asked what it would take for him to run.
“For the people to want me. What it would take is if I ran a political campaign, a presidential campaign, I would like to run it, and I don’t know if this is realistic or not, without having to beg for money. I would like it to be a voter-citizen-driven campaign for as much as it can be. Maybe at some point I might have to take a donation. I would rather not do that, but I would rather the people of the United States to say, ‘That’s the guy that we want. I’m gonna give him five dollars or $10’ or something that doesn’t break the bank because I know that the economy is tough,” Lemon said.
Here’s the video:
Don Lemon claims people keep asking him to run for president.
“I think I would be a really good president of the United States.”
DSA Official Shows He Doesn’t Even Understand the Difference Between the Senate and the House of Representatives (VIDEO)
July 17, 2026
Screencap of Twitter/X video.
Gustavo Gordillo is the co-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) in New York City. Today, he appeared on FOX News and showed that he does not even understand the difference between the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives.
Host Martha MacCallum was trying to clarify his position and the DSA’s position on the Senate because their official platform says that they want to abolish the body.
Gordillo says: “The United States Senate is an undemocratic institution. It gives more representation to people in smaller states than to the 30 million people in California.”
First of all, we are not a democracy and that was a choice the founders made on purpose. They did not want America to be a democracy.
More importantly, the Senate doesn’t represent the people, that’s what the House of Representatives is for. That’s why a large state like California has 52 House members and Wyoming has only one.
The Senate represents the states. Each state gets two senators to represent them in the Senate so that all the states have equal representation.
Here’s the video:
New York Democrat Socialists of America Co-Chair Gustavo Gordillo doubles down on the DSA’s attacks on the Senate:
“The United States Senate is an undemocratic institution. It gives more representation to people in smaller states than to the 30 million people in California.” pic.twitter.com/Jp8J5etoSO
Lots of people on the left make this same dumb mistake, not understanding the difference between the two chambers of Congress, but this guy is the co-chair of a movement that’s getting people elected to public office. Shouldn’t we expect him to at least know the difference?
These people are not nearly as smart as they seem to think they are. It’s really scary that they are getting access to power.
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Jackson Abruptly Leaves Event in Alaska Over Family Emergency
July 17, 2026
Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was pulled off stage over a family emergency this week.
At first it was unclear why Justice Jackson’s Fairbanks, Alaska, event was cut short, but on Friday evening an obituary was published for her father.
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s father, Johnny Brown, a prominent Miami attorney, passed away. He was 80 years old.
A staffer approached Justice Jackson at an event at the Charles Davis Concert Hall in Fairbanks and informed her of an urgent matter. She wrapped up her remarks and left the stage.
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson cut short a public appearance at the University of Alaska Fairbanks on Tuesday night after a liaison informed her of a personal emergency, organizers said.
The event at the Charles Davis Concert Hall drew more than 900 people. Jackson had been in the middle of a moderated question-and-answer session when the interruption occurred.
The moment was captured on camera. A staffer approached Jackson on stage and appeared to tell her there was an urgent matter that needed her attention. Jackson acknowledged the message, and the Q&A quickly wrapped up.
Event organizer Michelle Bartlett addressed the crowd after Jackson departed.
“There was an emergency that the justice needed to deal with,” Bartlett said. “I have no idea what it is. And to all of you who came out, stood in line, whatever you did to make it in here tonight, I am ever so grateful and I apologize.”
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
