Crackel Barrel’s CEO Steps Down After Disasterous ‘Woke’ Rebrand Sparked Uproar

Crackel Barrel’s CEO Steps Down After Disasterous ‘Woke’ Rebrand Sparked Uproar

Crackel Barrel’s CEO Steps Down After Disasterous ‘Woke’ Rebrand Sparked Uproar
July 27, 2026

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

In August 2025, Cracker Barrel’s CEO, Julie Felss Masino, sparked outrage by changing the restaurant chain’s iconic logo.

The company, as part of an attempted $700 million rebrand, announced it was replacing its 47-year-old logo, which featured the restaurant’s name next to a man sitting in a chair and leaning on a barrel.

The new, woke rebrand removed the man and the barrel, leaving just the name. She also pushed for changing the eclectic interior, opting for something cold and sterile, and then claimed the public just loved the new logo and look.

Her decisions may have ultimately cost Masino her job.

On Monday, the company announced Masino is stepping down after less than three years in the position and will be replaced by David Deno.

The outrage was so widespread,  even President Trump weighed in. He said, “Cracker Barrel should go back to the old logo, admit a mistake based on customer response (the ultimate Poll), and manage the company better than ever before,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “They got a Billion Dollars worth of free publicity if they play their cards right. Very tricky to do, but a great opportunity. Have a major News Conference today.”

Cracker Barrel’s co-founder Tommy Lowe was not impressed with the changes and called the new logo “pitiful.”

Lowe sat down with Newschannel5’s Carrie Sharp and had some harsh words for the woke CEO trying to destroy the business he founded.

“They’re trying to modernize to be like the competition – Cracker Barrel doesn’t have any competition. I heard she [Masino] was at Taco Bell. What’s Taco Bell know about Cracker Barrel and country food? They need to work on the food and service and leave the barrel – the logo alone,” Lowe said.

Although the company initially doubled down, it ultimately caved to public pressure and announced a return to the beloved “Old Timer” logo.

But not before doing damage to the company and, possibly, costing Masino her job.

Per the New York Post: 

Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Felss Masino is stepping down after the failure of her “woke” rebrand last year, which was rolled back following intense backlash from loyal customers, the company announced Monday.

David Deno, a restaurant exec who most recently served as CEO of Bloomin’ Brands, which owns Outback Steakhouse, will replace Masino on August 10, according to a Cracker Barrel press release.

Her departure comes after less than three years at the helm, during which diners revolted against the company’s attempts to modernize the Southern dining chain by axing its beloved mascot Uncle Herschel and revamping restaurants without its telltale tchotchkes.

 

The post Crackel Barrel’s CEO Steps Down After Disasterous ‘Woke’ Rebrand Sparked Uproar appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Margaret Flavin

Xi Jinping’s Bank Purges Could Have a Negative Impact on China’s Economy

Xi Jinping’s Bank Purges Could Have a Negative Impact on China’s Economy

Xi Jinping’s Bank Purges Could Have a Negative Impact on China’s Economy
July 27, 2026

Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption purges have swept through China’s financial sector, removing senior banking officials while increasing uncertainty for investors and exposing systemic weaknesses in state-directed lending. Photo courtesy of the Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the U.N.

China’s Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) announced on July 19 that Ouyang Weimin, former president and deputy party secretary of the China Development Bank (CDB), is under investigation for suspected serious violations of party discipline and the law. Typical of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) purges, no further information was given.

Ouyang joined the Chinese Communist Party in 1986 and spent much of his early career at the People’s Bank of China before serving as vice governor of Guangdong. He was appointed CDB president and deputy party secretary in 2019 and stepped down as president in 2023. CDB, founded in 1994, is a state-funded development finance institution overseen directly by the State Council.

In a separate action, a former CDB vice president was sentenced in 2024 to 12 years in prison and fined for accepting bribes. A second CDB official, Liang Qingkai, former party secretary and president of CDB’s Hunan branch, was placed under investigation the same day. This detail has only a single Chinese-language source and has not been independently confirmed.

Ouyang’s case fits into a broader pattern of purges across the China Development Bank (CDB) and other state-owned financial institutions. The CCP has punished or opened investigations into at least nine CDB executives for graft in a single year, with several accused of accepting bribes in exchange for approving loans.

Former CDB chairman Hu Huaibang helped CEFC China Energy and HNA Group obtain billions of dollars in credit. Both companies later collapsed into insolvency or restructuring. Former CDB vice president He Xingxiang was placed under investigation in September 2021, and former Yunnan branch president Hong Zhenghua was investigated the same year.

The South China Morning Post reported that more than 30 regulators and bankers were detained in a single year as part of the broader financial-sector crackdown. Analysts said investigators were targeting officials accused of approving loans in exchange for kickbacks, and more than a dozen senior executives at China’s largest financial institutions were investigated during the same period.

Taken together, the cases involving Hu Huaibang, He Xingxiang, Hong Zhenghua, Ouyang Weimin, and the unconfirmed investigation of Liang Qingkai suggest a recurring pattern in which CDB executives allegedly approved loans in exchange for bribes. In at least one documented case, the CEFC and HNA credit lines, the lending went to companies that later defaulted or entered restructuring.

Bad loans of this kind likely stem from a mix of factors: personal enrichment by officials approving the loans, poor planning, and pressure from the central government to inflate the overall scale of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) so that reported totals remain large.

Xi Jinping treats “financial security” as central to national security, and the financial sector crackdown reflects this view. Combined with broader state paranoia, it could further weaken business confidence among domestic and foreign investors.

The purge also raises the risks associated with senior banking positions in China. Despite that, opportunities for corruption will likely continue to attract some officials. For foreign investors, the crackdown adds another layer of uncertainty: loans may go unrecovered, or the officials who approved them may later be arrested.

China’s net investment position, measured by foreign direct investment into China versus outbound investment, turned negative about a year and a half before this writing. It remains very low. U.S. tariff policy under President Trump has further reduced China’s attractiveness to investors.

2026 growth projections run as low as 4.5% GDP, among the lowest on record outside the COVID period. Beijing is likely to report a figure closer to 5% regardless.

China’s official unemployment rate is about 5%. Youth unemployment is officially 16% to 18%. That figure excludes students, many of whom enrolled in school because they could not find jobs, and people absorbed into training programs for the same reason.

Real youth unemployment may be closer to 20%, consistent with the 21% to 23% peak recorded before Beijing stopped publishing the metric. It is likely higher today, given the tens of millions of university graduates entering the workforce without a matching rise in jobs.

An estimated 200 million to 400 million migrant workers remain registered as employed under the hukou system, some earning under $100 a month. Their work depended on a construction sector that has since slowed sharply. Construction accounts for at least 20% of the Chinese economy and depends directly on available financing.

Reduced investment limits factory construction, while U.S. tariffs restrict market access. The overall trajectory is continued economic slowdown rather than collapse.

CDB is one of China’s two principal financiers of overseas infrastructure and Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects, with estimated lending commitments of roughly $100 billion, the largest of any single Chinese institution.

Chinese banks’ balance sheets are burdened with doubtful loans, leaving little room for BRI-scale lending. New Chinese loan commitments have remained flat at about $7 billion annually since 2023, roughly one-quarter of the volumes seen during the initiative’s peak in the 2010s. It also found that China has shifted from a net provider of financing to developing countries to a net drain, with debt repayments now exceeding new disbursements.

With the United States positioned to gain control over Iran’s oil, that investment is unlikely to benefit China, compounding losses already tied to failed loans and corruption cases. Because no official BRI project list exists, Beijing can characterize any individual completed project as a success regardless of the initiative’s overall performance.

The post Xi Jinping’s Bank Purges Could Have a Negative Impact on China’s Economy appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Antonio Graceffo

Did Elon Musk Just Open America’s Last Retirement Window?

Did Elon Musk Just Open America’s Last Retirement Window?

Did Elon Musk Just Open America’s Last Retirement Window?
July 27, 2026

Note: The information provided here or in any related communications is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. We do not provide personalized investment, financial, or legal advice. Gateway Pundit benefits from purchases made through our sponsors.

 

by Jeff Brown

If you missed Nvidia when I first recommended it back in 2016, before shares jumped as high as 36,000%…

I have good news.

Elon Musk is creating a second and perhaps last chance for you to profit from this AI boom.

You see, I believe by the end of this month…

Elon’s new AI breakthrough (click here to see his patent) will collide…

With a powerful market prophecy that’s been unbroken for generations…

One that has correctly predicted some of the biggest market booms going back to 1950.

And the collision of these two economic forces…

Will give Americans a rare and perhaps last chance to turn a small stake into potentially…

An entire six-figure nest egg in the next 12-18 months.

If that sounds too good to be true…

You should know the last time these two rare economic forces collided…

Investors had a chance to turn a small stake of $10,000 into as much as $366,000 in just 14 months.

But this new retirement window won’t remain open for much longer.

The Wall Street Journal even recently warned Americans that AI advancements like this could be…

“The last chance to amass generational wealth.”

So click here now because if you miss this window…

You’ll probably never see an explosive opportunity like this again in your lifetime.

We have so much to look forward to,

The post Did Elon Musk Just Open America’s Last Retirement Window? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Promoted Post

JUST IN: Trump Calls Out John Thune, Says Dems “Can’t Believe How Lucky They Got With This Senate Leadership”

JUST IN: Trump Calls Out John Thune, Says Dems “Can’t Believe How Lucky They Got With This Senate Leadership”

JUST IN: Trump Calls Out John Thune, Says Dems “Can’t Believe How Lucky They Got With This Senate Leadership”
July 27, 2026

Credit: The White House

President Trump on Monday called out Senate Majority Leader John Thune, demanding that the Senate pass the SAVE America Act and terminate the filibuster, and saying the Democrats got “lucky” for Thune’s failed leadership. 

Trump lit up the Senate and Leader John Thune during a rally in Georgia last week, demanding, “Everybody call John Thune at the Senate. He’s the leader of the Republican Party. And tell him to get this stuff approved!”

“I have to say Mike Johnson and Congress have done a great job, but we’re having a hard time in the Senate. What they are doing, it’s just not right,” Trump said of the SAVE America Act.

“Congress is going to pass it again. They passed it three times. They are going to pass it again. It’s like the senate is a place you send things when you want them to die.”

WATCH:

On Monday, Trump called on the Senate to postpone their August recess “until it passes The Save America Act or, far better still, TERMINATES THE FILIBUSTER, where Republicans can then quickly pass everything they ever dreamed of, including a full and deep throated SAVE AMERICA ACT, the Budget, and the ever looming Debt Ceiling disaster, 1929!”

He added, “The Dumocrats will do it on day one, and can’t believe how lucky they got with this Senate leadership. Remember, stupidity always brings LOSING & DEATH!”

John Thune should not allow the United States Senate to “leave town” until it passes The Save America Act or, far better still, TERMINATES THE FILIBUSTER, where Republicans can then quickly pass everything they ever dreamed of, including a full and deep throated SAVE AMERICA ACT, the Budget, and the ever looming Debt Ceiling disaster, 1929! The Dumocrats will do it on day one, and can’t believe how lucky they got with this Senate leadership. Remember, stupidity always brings LOSING & DEATH! President DJT

Several Republican Senators have come out demanding that Thune cancel the August recess until the SAVE America Act is passed and signed into law.

Whichever Party Terminates the Filibuster FIRST will be the Party that survives and thrives. If the Dumocrats win this race, however, America will rapidly become nothing more than a Third World Nation! President DONALD J. TRUMP

The post JUST IN: Trump Calls Out John Thune, Says Dems “Can’t Believe How Lucky They Got With This Senate Leadership” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jordan Conradson

ABLECHILD: Connecticut’s Solnit Psychiatric Money Pit: The DCF Mental Institution Beast Wants More Money

ABLECHILD: Connecticut’s Solnit Psychiatric Money Pit: The DCF Mental Institution Beast Wants More Money

ABLECHILD: Connecticut’s Solnit Psychiatric Money Pit: The DCF Mental Institution Beast Wants More Money
July 27, 2026

Connecticut’s Solnit Psychiatric Money Pit: The DCF Mental Institution Beast Wants More Money

Republished with permission from AbleChild.

AbleChild Site Visit to CT DCF Mental Institution two year ago VIDEO

On July 21, 2026, Department of Children and Families (DCF) employees stood on the lawn of the Albert J. Solnit Children’s Center in Middletown asking Connecticut lawmakers for at least $20 million in new taxpayer funding, along with another $3 million every year to improve the facility.

As officials pleaded for more money, the condition of the state-owned psychiatric campus told a different story. Looking across the deteriorating property, taxpayers should be asking one simple question: Where has all mental health and behavioral health money gone?

Looking back over the past fourteen years, AbleChild has consistently investigated, testified, submitted recommendations, filed public inquiries, and exposed the psychiatric drugging of children in Connecticut’s state care, including sharing Medicaid psychiatric prescribing data patterns with behavioral health oversight committee members. Throughout that time, AbleChild has repeatedly urged state officials to replace a failed institutional psychiatric model with approaches that emphasize education, life skills, family and community support, and accountability.  Today, despite AbleChild’s warnings and repeated calls for reform, the state has ignored the call for human rights and is once again asking taxpayers for millions more.

A state that routinely inspects private properties should first explain whether one of its own psychiatric facilities has been held to the same standards it expects of everyone else. If millions of taxpayer dollars have already been invested in the Solnit Center, why does the property appear to be in such a state of decline?

Before lawmakers approve another appropriation, they should ask an even more important question: Why should taxpayers invest another $23 million in a system that AbleChild warned was failing fourteen years ago?

AbleChild first raised that warning in 2012 after touring the children’s psychiatric unit at Riverview Hospital. What our nonprofit witnessed was deeply disturbing. Children were confined in locked rooms with curtains covering the windows, hidden from public view. The conditions reflected an institutional model built on isolation, confinement, and psychiatric intervention rather than providing the kind of care Connecticut’s most vulnerable children deserved.

Following that inspection, AbleChild testified before the Connecticut General Assembly, urging lawmakers to shut down the children’s psychiatric program instead of continuing to pour taxpayer dollars into a failing system. AbleChild also provided ABC News’ Diane Sawyer with information concerning the psychiatric drugging of children in Connecticut’s care, helping bring national attention to practices that had received far too little public scrutiny.

Connecticut’s response was to ignore any reform of the program.  Instead, it changed its name.  The children’s psychiatric facility became the Albert J. Solnit Children’s Center, honoring Yale child psychiatrist Dr. Albert J. Solnit. But changing the name on the building did not change the system.

More than a decade later, AbleChild returned to the campus. What AbleChild found was alarming. Instead of a modern therapeutic environment, the property appeared neglected and deteriorated. Years of taxpayer funding had not produced a campus that reflected healing, safety, or responsible stewardship of public resources. AbleChild raised the same questions: why should the taxpayers continue to trust the behavioral health providers?

Connecticut’s own auditors provide part of the answer. The Department of Children and Families (DCF) has repeatedly failed to properly account for taxpayer-funded property. According to the most recent audit, the agency could not account for nearly $262,000 in state-owned assets, failed to complete required inventories, and maintained inaccurate property records. Even more troubling, auditors found that similar deficiencies have been cited for more than twenty years, demonstrating a pattern of recurring management failures rather than isolated mistakes.

DCF is responsible for more than $274 million in state property and equipment. If the agency cannot accurately account for taxpayer-funded assets or correct problems that auditors have identified decade after decade, taxpayers have every reason to question why the answer is always additional funding.

The Solnit Center has become a symbol of a larger problem. Every few years, Connecticut taxpayers hear the same explanation: the buildings are old, staffing is difficult, and more funding is needed. Yet the same complaints continue while facilities deteriorate, audit findings repeat themselves, and meaningful reform never seems to arrive.

At some point, taxpayers deserve accountability. Children in state care deserve excellent schools, vocational education, apprenticeships, mentoring, life-skills training, recreational opportunities, stable family and community support, and programs that prepare them for adulthood. They deserve every opportunity to build independent, productive lives.

The population also deserve protection from unnecessary exposure to powerful psychiatric drugs. Many psychiatric medications prescribed to children—including several antidepressants—carry FDA boxed warnings about an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children, adolescents, and young adults.

Those warnings should compel the state to provide children with exit ramps to these cocktails of psychiatric drugs or at the very least to use these drugs cautiously, with rigorous oversight, informed consent, and continuous evaluation of safer and more effective alternatives.

Connecticut should open its child welfare system to educators, vocational trainers, mentors, nonprofit organizations, faith-based charities, community groups, and other providers outside the traditional behavioral health industry. Public dollars should follow programs that produce measurable results—educational achievement, employment, independent living, family stability, and successful transitions into adulthood.

For too long, the behavioral health system has largely measured success by services delivered and dollars spent, while taxpayers are given little evidence that children leave the system healthier, more independent, or better prepared for life.

The Solnit Center has had decades to prove its value. Before lawmakers approve another $23 million, they should answer one question that every Connecticut taxpayer deserves to hear: What has all that money bought?

If the answer is deteriorating buildings, repeated audit findings, continued dependence on psychiatric drugs, and another request for millions more, then Connecticut should stop investing in a failed institutional model and start investing in the futures of the children it has a duty to protect.

AbleChild is a 501(3) C nonprofit organization that has recently co-written landmark legislation in Tennessee, setting a national precedent for transparency and accountability in the intersection of mental health, pharmaceutical practices, and public safety.

What you can do.  Sign the Petition calling for federal hearings!

Donate! Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded. Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive.  As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives.

The post ABLECHILD: Connecticut’s Solnit Psychiatric Money Pit: The DCF Mental Institution Beast Wants More Money appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Joe Hoft