From Canada to Europe, citizens are pushing back against migration because of concerns over crime, welfare dependency, and the broader fiscal burden. Photo courtesy of CBC.

A Canadian group is being called racist for pushing back against immigration, but they have legitimate grounds to believe the country would benefit from mass deportations.

Statistics Canada’s “immigrant generation” measure shows 44% of Canadians are first- or second-generation, either immigrants themselves or Canadian-born children of at least one immigrant parent. This includes 26.4% first generation and 17.6% second generation, with the combined share projected to reach 49.8% to 54.3% by 2041. Canada was home to 755 mosques as of December 2024; no reliably sourced count exists for 30 years earlier for comparison.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) reports the incidence of social assistance among immigrants is stable at 6%, below the national average of 8%. On crime, no Canadian government or think-tank source, left or right, publishes data broken down by immigrant origin the way Denmark and Sweden do.

That 6% figure comes from Statistics Canada’s “immigrant” category, which does not include non-permanent residents, a separate classification covering work and study permit holders and asylum claimants. Once granted status, Protected Persons claimed social assistance at 39% in their first year in Canada, declining to 20% after ten years. These rates are several times higher than the general immigrant figure but are reported under a separate legal category rather than folded into it.

Labor force data shows similar variation by origin. Most immigrant groups in Canada have female participation rates between 60% and 80%, but Statistics Canada research found that women from Pakistan fall below 50%. A peer-reviewed study using linked Statistics Canada survey data found that women from the Middle East and North Africa have the lowest labor force participation of any immigrant group, an effect the researchers attributed to source-country gender norms rather than religion specifically.

More broadly, racialized immigrant women had a 77% labor force participation rate and a 12% unemployment rate in 2021, the lowest and highest rates, respectively, among all immigrant groups measured.

The Fraser Institute estimated Canada’s net fiscal burden from immigration at over $6,000 per capita in 2005/06, totaling $16.3 to $23.6 billion that year.

This is where the Dominion Society of Canada comes in. The nationalist group is drawing national attention for a plan to deport millions of people. Its rise is part of a wider anti-immigration pattern of mobilization spreading across Western democracies, including a loosely organized protest movement against asylum accommodation in Ireland that has grown steadily since 2022.

The Dominion Society has scheduled a national conference, “DomCon 2026,” for August 29 in the Hamilton, Ontario, area. The group was founded on July 1, 2025, by Daniel Tyrie, a former executive director of the People’s Party of Canada, along with Greg Wycliffe and Ken Jones. It is registered as a non-profit corporation with an office in Ottawa. Members can join for a $25 fee.

The group advocates what it calls “remigration” of an estimated five million to nine million people, a category that includes temporary foreign workers, permanent residents, and people born in Canada to non-Canadian citizen parents.

The Canadian Anti-Hate Network reported that Dominion Society had roughly 1,600 registered members in October 2025, and by summer 2026, Dominion Society itself claimed roughly 3,000 members while raising hundreds of thousands of dollars. Evan Balgord, who directs the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, told CBC that Dominion Society likely has thousands of members, mostly young white men and boys.

On August 4, 2026, the Hamilton Anti-Racism Resource Centre and the Hamilton Centre for Civic Inclusion published an open letter advising local businesses against renting space to Dominion Society and calling on elected officials to denounce the group.

Mayor Andrea Horwath followed on August 12 by sending her own letters to venues, writing that “the Dominion Society’s own website identifies ‘remigration’ as a central objective of its movement, and the Canadian Anti-Hate Network has identified the organization as part of Canada’s broader white-nationalist movement.” Horwath said she was not asking venues to act outside their own policies, only to have “full context” before booking.

The City of Hamilton confirmed it would not rent municipal facilities to Dominion Society, and the venue originally booked for the conference canceled its reservation, though Hamilton police did not disclose the venue’s identity or reason. Dominion Society responded by telling CBC it is keeping DomCon’s exact location secret so its members are not targeted by opponents.

Part of the pressure on venues stemmed from the conference’s announced speaker lineup. DomCon 2026 advertised Austrian activist Martin Sellner as a speaker; Sellner is permanently banned from entering the United Kingdom over his role in far-right and identitarian activism, and Canadian officials did not say publicly whether he would be admitted to Canada. When Sellner responded to a Dominion Society post promoting his appearance by writing “I hope they let me in,” Dominion Society chair Daniel Tyrie said in an emailed response that the group’s legal team could not find a reason he would be barred.

The City of Hamilton also confirmed that bylaw officers have been monitoring Dominion Society promotional posters placed on public property, and Hamilton police said they were preparing a plan to address any risks, disruptions, or criminal activity connected to the event.

Criticism of the group has come from across the political spectrum. Jason Kenney, a former Conservative federal immigration minister and Alberta premier, publicly called Dominion Society founder Daniel Tyrie “racist” after Tyrie gave an interview to the outlet Juno News advocating remigration. Kenney said Tyrie’s group is “not just opposed to ‘mass immigration,’ but to ANY immigration,” pointing to the group’s own website call for a “total moratorium on all immigration for a minimum of 10 years” and “the forcible deportation of every legal permanent resident in Canada.” Kenney separately told CBC’s Front Burner that failing to draw a line against the group risks “mainstreaming or destigmatizing outright racist sentiments.”

Barbara Perry, who directs the Centre on Hate, Bias and Extremism at Ontario Tech University, said the group also promotes the “great replacement” conspiracy theory. The Canadian Anti-Hate Network’s own report on the group notes that Dominion Society’s platform exempts what it calls “heritage Canadians” from deportation — a category the Network says the group has defined, inconsistently, as exclusively white — while applying its deportation plan to legal permanent residents and naturalized citizens who fall outside that category.

Canada’s federal deportation numbers, separate from any activist platform, have also risen. The Canada Border Services Agency removed 23,160 people in 2025, the highest single-year total in the agency’s history, with removals reaching roughly 400 people a week by March 2026. More than half of those removals occurred in Quebec, where the Migrant Justice Clinic in Montreal has described a sharp escalation in enforcement tactics.

In Ireland, anti-immigration organizing has followed a different trajectory but a similar arc of growth. The Garda Síochána recorded 307 anti-migrant protests in 2022 and at least 169 more through August 2023, concentrated in Dublin neighborhoods including East Wall, Ballymun, Finglas and Drimnagh, as well as towns such as Mullingar and Roscrea. Protesters have organized under slogans including “Ireland is Full,” and demonstrations have at times escalated into arson attacks on buildings intended to house asylum seekers, including incidents in Coolock in 2024.

The International Protection Accommodation Service reported roughly 33,250 people in its accommodation system at the end of 2025, a 450 percent increase since 2021, even as new asylum applications declined. Ireland’s government passed the International Protection Bill 2026, intended to speed asylum decisions and extend the residency requirement for citizenship to five years; the law drew criticism from UNHCR Ireland, Nasc and the Irish Refugee Council.

A June 2026 knife attack in Belfast triggered several nights of disorder in Belfast, Portadown, Derry and Newtownabbey, and protesters on both sides of the border adopted the slogan “Irish Lives Matter,” which the Police Service of Northern Ireland recorded as a hate incident after it appeared at the Kennedy Centre on Belfast’s Falls Road.

Security analysts note that the open border under the Common Travel Area allows demonstrations in Belfast and Dublin to draw overlapping supporter bases, and that 90 percent of asylum seekers entering the Republic of Ireland may have first traveled through Northern Ireland.

Global Project Against Hate and Extremism has tracked more than a dozen active nationalist and anti-immigration groups in Ireland, including the Irish Freedom Party and the National Party, and traces the movement’s growth to the period following COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, when anti-lockdown organizing networks pivoted toward opposition to asylum accommodation.

Similar organizations have formed in other countries. In Italy, the Identitarian Movement organized the first Remigration Summit in Milan in May 2025, drawing about 400 attendees. A follow-up gathering in Portugal in May 2026 drew more than 500 activists and influencers, including former U.S. Border Patrol chief Gregory Bovino and American Renaissance editor Jared Taylor.

In Spain, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network has noted parallels between Dominion Society and groups such as Núcleo Nacional, which is under investigation for a hate crime after sharing anti-immigration content online. In Canada itself, Dominion Society shares overlapping membership with Second Sons Canada, a group that conducts firearms training, mixed martial arts, and military-style drills under the supervision of veterans.

In the United States, the Federation for American Immigration Reform, founded in 1979, remains the country’s largest and longest-running immigration-restriction organization. The Southern Poverty Law Center classifies it as a hate group with ties to white supremacist figures, a designation FAIR disputes.

Government data from several European countries shows migrant-origin populations overrepresented in violent crime, rape convictions, and welfare receipt. In Denmark, non-Western immigrants and their descendants, 8.9% of the population, account for 25.4% of violent crime convictions, with the highest individual rates recorded among men born in Lebanon, Somalia, Morocco, Syria, and Pakistan, all Muslim-majority countries.

In Sweden, 58% of men convicted of rape or attempted rape over a recent five-year period were born abroad. Brå, Sweden’s national crime-prevention agency, found that individuals of North African origin carry the highest relative risk of criminal suspicion of any origin group, at 4.7 times the rate of native Swedes.

On welfare, 45% of German unemployment-benefit recipients are non-citizens, while a Dutch study using official CBS microdata found that non-Western immigrants have relatively high reliance on non-employment benefit categories, tied mainly to lower average incomes.

The post Anti-Immigration Movements Gain Ground in Canada, Ireland and Beyond appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Former gubernatorial candidate and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is suing the Minnesota secretary of state and local election officials, saying they changed the parameters of a potential recount following his loss in the Republican primary.

Earlier this month, Lindell finished second to state House Speaker Lisa Demuth, falling short by around 45,000 votes, or 11 points, despite an endorsement from President Donald Trump.

Due to the large margin between Lindell and Demuth, state law requires him to pay $825,000 for the recount and submit that payment by Monday, according to Alpha News.

Lindell said his wire transfer was ready to go when “the Minnesota Secretary of State, at the last minute, changed the scope of the recount in violation of Minnesota law.”

Instead of recounting all the votes, Lindell said the process would only examine votes linked to Lindell and Demuth, despite several other candidates being on the ballot.

Lindell’s team is arguing that setting such narrow terms violates Minnesota statutes. They also said this change amounts to a “bait-and-switch” tactic, putting him in an impossible position. Either he pays for a recount that’s narrowed in scope, or he fights it in court and misses the Monday deadline.

“Lindell has asked the state to waive the statutory payment deadline until a court can rule on the parameters of the recount proposed by the Secretary of State,” a news release said. “In order to address this issue, the campaign is now taking immediate legal action.”

The action, reportedly filed on Monday, asks the Minnesota Supreme Court to step in and force the secretary of state to “conduct a full recount of all ballots cast for the office of Governor.”

Following his defeat, Lindell said he would seek a recount due to troubling “anomalies” on election night. He claimed there were “unusual synchronized vote totals across all seven Republican candidates” and that counties were “reporting more votes than cast.”

The lawsuit also includes the State Canvassing Board chaired by Democratic Secretary of State Steve Simon.

Lindell spoke with NBC News on Tuesday, telling the outlet that he refused payment after learning of the changes.

“I paid this to have all of the votes counted, not just two people,” he declared. “I need to have a real recount, and I will fight this in court and get that real recount. I don’t care if it costs triple. I didn’t hold back anything. They did a bait-and-switch on me, and it’s disgusting.”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Mike Lindell Sues Minnesota Election Officials Over Recount ‘Bait and Switch’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A 28-year-old Houston man already free on a $600,000 bond in a murder case is now accused of running a nearly $24 million check-theft ring, by recruiting U.S. Postal Service mail carriers to steal checks off their own routes and selling the loot on Telegram.

Tryston Tremaine Vaughn, 28, is alleged to have recruited USPS mail carriers to steal checks on their delivery routes, the DOJ said in an August 25 statement.

Those checks were then allegedly bought from the postal workers by Vaughn and others, advertised on a Telegram channel called “slipsandchips,” and shipped to buyers across the country via FedEx.

Prosecutors say the haul totaled approximately $23,973,338.15. One stolen check was for $1.5 million.

And the man accused of running the operation was not locked in a cell while this was happening. He was walking around on bond after a fatal shooting.

A federal grand jury in the Southern District of Texas returned a nine-count indictment charging five people:

• Tryston Tremaine Vaughn, 28 — alleged recruiter and ringleader
• Alyssa Nadine Bryant, 27 — accused of helping buy, sell, and ship the stolen checks
• Catherine Clauzelle Kilpatrick, 29 — USPS mail carrier (Greens North Station)
• Drakkor Jamar Alexander, 34 — USPS mail carrier (Spring Main Post Office)
• Malcolm Tiree Joubert, 35 — USPS mail carrier (Windmill Station)

All five face conspiracy to commit bank fraud and bank fraud. The three carriers also face theft of mail matter by a postal employee.

If convicted, the fraud counts carry up to 30 years in federal prison and fines of up to $1 million. The mail-theft counts add up to five more years for the carriers.

According to the indictment, Vaughn recruited the carriers to pull checks out of the mail they were paid by taxpayers to deliver. He and Bryant then met the workers, bought the stolen checks, posted them for sale on Telegram, and mailed them to purchasers.

The charged conduct began around October 2022. Specific checks cited in the indictment include:

• A $1,517,875.27 BMO Bank check prosecutors say Joubert stole from the mail in May 2024
• A $79,894.60 Citibank check Vaughn allegedly mailed to a Telegram buyer in April 2024
• A $25,007.25 Stellar Bank check Vaughn and Bryant allegedly mailed in September 2024

Banks named in the case include Chase, Amegy, Citibank, BMO, and Stellar.

As of this week, four of the five defendants were in custody. Alexander remained at large. Kilpatrick appeared in federal court August 24 and pleaded not guilty. Reports indicated she could be released on an unsecured $50,000 bond.

Yes. A postal worker accused of feeding a multimillion-dollar theft ring, and the system is already talking about an unsecured bond.

And the story gets even more disturbing.

Vaughn is also charged in Fort Bend County with murder, according to Click2Houston.

Stafford police say that in March 2025 he went to a motel parking lot off the Southwest Freeway looking for someone he believed had stolen a $92,000 necklace.

Surveillance video, police say, shows him firing on a moving vehicle. The shots missed the intended target and killed 22-year-old Kerry Thomas, described as a bystander. Thomas’s family had moved to the Houston area from New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.

Vaughn was arrested. He posted a $600,000 bond last May and walked free.

Then, according to federal prosecutors, the check pipeline kept moving.

This is Houston. This is Harris County’s culture of catch-and-release dressed up as “pretrial justice.” A man accused of gunning down a bystander over jewelry is given a six-figure ticket back onto the street, and federal prosecutors now say he was in the middle of a $24 million mail-theft conspiracy that used actual U.S. postal employees as the supply chain.

The post Accused Murderer Out on $600K Bond Recruited USPS Carriers to Steal Nearly $24 MILLION in Checks — Then Sold Them on Telegram appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Two of Iowa’s most prominent Democratic candidates have urged former Vice-President Kamala Harris to stay away from their state ahead of the midterms.

Iowa gubernatorial candidate Rob Sand was asked by POLITICO’s Jonathan Martin whether he wanted Harris to come and campaign for him.

“No thanks,” he responded: Let’s move on. We need some new leadership.”

Asked whether Harris should run again in 2028, his answer was similarly emphatic.

”No,” he said.

Watch the clip below:

First high-profile Dem to answer this question directly

You’d think that after saying one thing in public and another in private from ‘21-June ‘24 about Biden and Kamala, more Dems would live their truth ™ ! https://t.co/a3vClHbQON

— Jonathan Martin (@jmart) August 26, 2026

Meanwhile, The Washington Examiner reports that Senatorial candidate Josh Turek has issued a similar warning.

Their report states:

Democratic Senate candidate Josh Turek similarly does not want Harris near his campaign against Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA) to replace retiring Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA)

Turek’s campaign told the Washington Examiner he has no plans to campaign with Harris and is not seeking her support.

In 2024, Turek, an Iowa state representative, outperformed Harris by roughly 13 points in his district, illustrating the dramatically different political coalitions the two Democrats assembled in Iowa.

Over in Alaska, former Rep. Mary Peltola also distanced herself from Harris as she campaigns to unseat Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan in the state’s Senate race.

Harris had attempted to boost Peltola, sending supporters a fundraising email asking them to contribute to both her own political operation and Peltola’s campaign.

“If there’s anyone who can flip Alaska and secure the Senate majority for Democrats — it’s Mary,” the email says.

But Peltola, who won Alaska’s at-large House seat in 2022 before losing it two years later, quickly made clear that she was not seeking Harris’s backing.

“Mary isn’t seeking endorsements from anyone from the Lower 48 — her focus is and always will be Alaska,” a campaign spokeswoman said, according to Anchorage station KTUU.

After losing the 2024 presidential election by a landslide, Harris briefly flirted with the possibility of a campaign for governor of California before eventually abandoning the idea.

According to the latest RealClearPolitics polling average, Harris currently remains the favorite to win the Democratic nomination with 27.6 percent support.

Those trailing her include Gavin Newsom on 16.4 percent, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on 11.6 percent and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on 9.4 percent.

The post Top Iowa Democrats Urge Kamala Harris to Stay Away From Their State Ahead of Midterms appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Do Democrats even bother to vet their candidates for sexual depravity in their past, or do they just wing it?

This has been an open question since the Graham Platner disaster, but at least the man who won the Maine Democratic senatorial nomination and then was forced to give it up after a rape allegation topped off a long, sordid, and documented history of perversion gave it up. Bobby Pulido is still running, and while he’s never been accused of rape, the Texas U.S. House candidate’s past is so deeply troubling that he should have bowed out long ago.

In the latest resurfaced problem for the congressional hopeful and Tejano music star, Pulido defended the artist behind a controversial 2016 music video in which the musician tortures, gropes, and then kills an unfaithful girlfriend.

Pulido called it “the decision of the artist and their team” — which, considering the decisions Pulido has made in the past, is probably not the statement he wanted resurfacing.

According to Fox News, the controversy involved Mexican folk singer Gerardo Ortíz and the video for his song “Fuiste Mía,” or “You Were Mine.”

The video initially shows pictures of a happy couple — the singer and another woman. Then, Ortíz discovers her being romantic with another man.

Ortíz pulls a gun out of a cabinet and shoots the man dead. He then corners the cheating girlfriend, handcuffs her, gropes her, and shoves her into a car trunk while choking her.

He then sets the car on fire by dropping a cigarette as the police close in on his house, smiling as he walks away.

Asked about the video in an interview, the Latin Grammy Award-winning Pulido said it was perfectly fine by him.

“I’ve made videos with suggestive images; some have stayed, others have been edited, and still others were never used,” he said.

“That’s the decision of the artist and their team.”

He said that it was akin to rubbernecking during a highway crash: “What happens when there’s a [car] accident?” Pulido asked rhetorically. “Traffic doesn’t flow because people slow down or even stop to see what happened; something similar happens with the regional Mexican genre when these kinds of incidents occur.”

His campaign is singing a different tune now, using dubious allegations that his opponent “verbally abused” her daughter to deflect from Pulido’s 2016 comments.

“This is emblematic of national Republicans doing anything and everything to distract voters from what are very real — not based on a fictional video — child abuse accusations against Monica De La Cruz and her refusal to release the Epstein files after thousands of girls were trafficked and abused,” the campaign said.

Just to be clear, this is based on allegations by her ex-husband during divorce proceedings, which we all know we can completely trust.

“Monica De La Cruz knows she’s losing, so she’s deploying the RNC to do her dirty work and deliberately mischaracterized a decade-old Spanish-language interview, in which Bobby said he respects artists’ right to make their own music — a right that Republicans used to believe in but apparently don’t when it comes to their opponents,” they added.

It’s unclear that De La Cruz is losing in the race in Texas’ 15th Congressional District, but the Republican’s seat is one that the Democrats have targeted with star power. While Pulido is hardly a household name outside of the Latin music community, he’s considered Tejano royalty.

However, the path to an easy victory has been blocked by Pulido’s Platner-ish past.

At first, his frequent comments about his pornography consumption on social media — including links to sites known to host videos of underage and non-consensual pornographic content — were his biggest issue. Then came a resurfaced video of his own, “Dias de Ayer,” in which he plays a series of bizarre characters, including a self-pleasuring cross-dresser and an exhibitionist. (This had nothing to do with the lyrics, mind you; it was apparently in response to rumors within the Tejano community that Pulido had some perversions of his own, including being a little light in the loafers.)

This was all a bit gross, albeit not disqualifying. Then came el escándalo de Frankie Caballero, in which it was discovered that Pulido toured with the accordionist and sex offender, who was convicted of molesting an 8-year-old girl, long after the conviction. Pulido even performed at a school event with him, as if that weren’t bad enough.

While Pulido denied knowing about the conviction, sources within the Tejano music scene said that Caballero’s sordid past was a well-known fact in the scene.

“This really raises some concerns about Bobby’s judgment. You get to a certain point in music where they vet everybody around you,” said Tejano bass player Ramon Rodriguez.

A former Hidalgo County, Texas, prosecutor also told the New York Post when the story first broke in April that there was “simply no version of this story where Bobby Pulido did not know the man he employed and befriended for decades is a career child predator.”

He added that Caballero would have had a “probation officer” that Pulido’s people would have had to contact and “employer verifications” Caballero would have had to undergo to perform with the star. He also had performed with Pulido long before his conviction on the molestation charges but after other convictions and arrests, including one arrest for aggravated sexual assault.

But sure — this is all because Rep. De La Cruz is really worried that she might have yelled at her daughter a few times and that’s going to sway the voters.

There comes a point at which we have to ask how stupid the Democrats think we are when it comes to how they vet their candidates so long as the candidate involved creates buzz around an important race.

Platner turned out to be an accused rapist, but the red flags were there long before the allegation came out. Precisely how many red flags must the party be shown before Bobby Pulido is consigned to a similar fate?

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Dem Candidate, Music Superstar With Sick Sexual History Defended Fellow Musician’s Video In Which He Gropes and Kills Woman appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Senator Lisa Murkowski on Wednesday responded to James O’Keefe’s latest undercover video exposing Alaska’s voter laws.

The O’Keefe Media Group on Tuesday dropped another video exposing Senator Lisa Murkowski and Alaska’s voting laws.

Senator Murkowski says she opposes the SAVE America Act which would require voter ID.

Murkowski demonstrated that a person living on the small Alaska islands would not be able to vote if the SAVE America Act was passed because they would have to travel all the way to Anchorage to get an ID.

James O’Keefe went to a small Alaskan island called Unalaska and asked DMV workers if he had to travel 800 miles to Anchorage to get an ID.

“We don’t have to go to Anchorage to get an ID?” O’Keefe asked the DMV worker.

The employee responded, “No, you can come here.”

O’Keefe continued: An Unalaska resident confirmed voting takes place at City Hall and said residents “Don’t have to go to Anchorage [to register to vote or obtain ID].”

WATCH:

EXCLUSIVE: O’Keefe Uncovers Unalaska Election Officials Contradicting Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s SAVE Act Claims, Telling O’Keefe That Island Residents Do NOT Have to Travel 800 Miles to Anchorage to Register to Vote or Obtain ID

O’Keefe asked an Unalaska local DMV employee, “We… pic.twitter.com/oDGw1ETrEq

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) August 25, 2026

Murkowski responded to O’Keefe’s latest hidden camera footage of Unalaska and said she stands by her

The Alaska Senator said she stands by her concerns about how the SAVE America Act would impact Alaskan voters.

Official Response from Sen @lisamurkowski‘s Press Team https://t.co/4vsILtwRro pic.twitter.com/feCUQtAkuM

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) August 25, 2026

Last Thursday, James O’Keefe released undercover video of an Anchorage, Alaska, poll worker offering him Senator Lisa Murkowski’s brother’s ballot.

An Anchorage poll worker also offered Lisa Murkowski’s State Director, Karina Waller’s ballot without an ID last Tuesday’s primary.

Last week, Murkowski called for James O’Keefe to be prosecuted.

“Senator Murkowski has consistently supported the requirement of photo ID to vote, and earlier this month, she voted in favor of a separate measure on the Senate floor to do just that,” Murkowski said.

The post RINO Murkowski Responds to James O’Keefe’s Latest Undercover Video on Alaska’s Voting Laws appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.