President Trump on Tuesday told The Gateway Pundit that he “doesn’t take a position” on the investigation into Ilhan Omar or whether she should be deported, while slamming her as a “terrible person” who doesn’t “love our country at all.” 

Omar’s Washington, DC home was raided early on Monday morning in a criminal fraud investigation that is looking at Omar’s immigration paperwork, which was filled out by her late father when she was a teen. Investigators were seen hauling  boxes of evidence out of her home yesterday.

Officials believe that she may have lied on her papers, constituting fraudulent citizenship. Border Czar Tom Homan and DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin have both suggested that she lied and could be deported.

Asked by The Gateway Pundit on Tuesday if he personally wants to see Omar’s deportation, Trump said, “I don’t take a position.”

“I think she’s a terrible person. I think she’s a terrible congresswoman,” he added.

“I don’t think she loves our country at all, but I don’t take a position.”

Likewise, Trump on Monday, following the raid on Omar’s home, distanced himself from the investigation, telling reporters, “I’ve always found her to be totally crooked, personally, but that has nothing to do with me… That’s really up to the DOJ; I have nothing to do with it.”

Still, he savaged Omar and her third-world home country of Somalia.

“I think she’s a terrible person, just a complainer. She comes from a country that is a non-country, and then she comes over here, and she complains about our Constitution,” he said.

WATCH:

The reportedly years-long probe is looking into whether she or her father lied on her citizenship application and obtained citizenship through fraudulent means.

Even the left-wing media was forced to admit that the feds likely have evidence against Omar, given the fact that the court granted a warrant to raid her home.

MORE:

(VIDEO) MS Now Admits Feds Likely Have Evidence Against Ilhan Omar as Investigators Examine Immigration Paperwork in Years-Long Criminal Fraud Probe

The post (VIDEO) Trump Asked by TGP if He Wants to See Ilhan Omar Deported: “I Don’t Think She Loves Our Country at All, but I Don’t Take a Position” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

On Tuesday, President Trump responded to Kimberly Guilfoyle’s resignation while speaking to reporters at the White House. 

“She was almost a member of your family. How surprised were you to hear about these allegations?” a reporter asked, referencing Guilfoyle’s past engagement to Donald Trump Jr.

Trump fired back, distancing his family from her, “She wasn’t a member of my family. She, I guess, dated my son a long time ago.” He continued, “She went to Greece; she was doing a good job, but we didn’t like what we were reading.”

When asked whether he spoke to Guilfoyle, Trump added, “I didn’t speak to her; no, but she will not be there.”

“I didn’t like what I read,” he added.

WATCH:

The new White House Press Secretary, Katie Zacharia, confirmed to reporters this morning that Guilfoyle had been asked to resign as Ambassador to Greece amid a pay-for-play scandal.

“We have asked Ambassador Guilfoyle to resign. She has been a wonderful asset to the team, and we wish her well,” she said.

WATCH:

Less than an hour later, Guilfoyle announced her resignation.

MORE:

BREAKING: Kimberly Guilfoyle Resigns as US Ambassador to Greece

The post WATCH: Trump Responds to Kimberly Guilfoyle’s Resignation – “She Wasn’t a Member of My Family – I Didn’t Like What I Read” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Just when you think the radical open-border lobby and activist judges have pushed the legal system to its absolute limit, the United States Supreme Court is now being forced to step in to answer a question that should take precisely two seconds to answer:

Should a man who cooked thousands of meals to sustain members of an armed terrorist organization be granted legal asylum inside the United States?

The case, Blanche v. Ozurumba, involves Izuchukwu Ozurumba, who entered the United States illegally in July 2023 after spending roughly six months in 2022 as a cook for a group known as the “Unknown Gunmen.”

Court records show he prepared three meals a day for 15 to 17 of the group’s leaders at a remote camp outside Lagos, potentially thousands of meals over the period. U.S. officials determined the Unknown Gunmen qualify as a Tier III terrorist organization, The Center Square reported.

An immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals found that this constituted “material support” for terrorism under the Immigration and Nationality Act, rendering him ineligible for asylum. He was later removed to Nigeria.

Ozurumba claims “he was lured” by a job tip, discovered the true nature of the camp, and was forced to continue working (including unpaid for part of the time) under threat before escaping during a grocery run and eventually fleeing to Venezuela and then the U.S. The Board of Immigration Appeals has held that the statute contains no duress exception for providing support to terrorist groups.

A divided panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in September 2025. Judge Andrew Wynn (an Obama appointee) ruled that Ozurumba’s cooking, using food and supplies provided by the group itself, was not “material” because it did not provide anything the organization could “use or readily divert to plan or carry out its terrorist activities.” The majority described him as a “captive laborer.”

In dissent, Judge Julius Richardson argued that feeding the leaders of a terrorist organization for months is quantitatively and functionally material support, an army marches on its stomach, and the meals freed up resources for the group’s activities.

The Trump administration, through Attorney General Todd Blanche and Solicitor General D. John Sauer, petitioned the Supreme Court.

The government argues the Fourth Circuit’s ruling guts the material-support bar, conflicts with other circuits, and would “substantially increase the burden on the government in excluding aliens with links to terrorism.”

As the Justice Department put it, “Providing meals to a terrorist organization’s members is no less a material form of support than providing gasoline for its vehicles.” The law “does not distinguish between guns and butter.”

The Supreme Court granted certiorari on Tuesday. Arguments are expected later in the term, with a decision by the end of June 2027.

The question presented is whether “material support” under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI) requires that the support advance the organization’s actual commission of terrorism.

The Department of Justice warned the Supreme Court that if the Fourth Circuit’s ridiculous precedent is allowed to stand, it will “substantially increase the burden on the government in excluding aliens with links to terrorism”.

If preparing food for terrorists doesn’t count as material support, what’s next? Washing the blood off their uniforms? Driving the getaway vans? Managing their payroll?

The post You Can’t Make This Up: Supreme Court to Decide If Nigerian Terrorist Group’s Personal Chef Deserves U.S. Asylum and Taxpayer Benefits appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In 2025, The Gateway Pundit reported that during a House Oversight DOGE subcommittee hearing, Republicans on the committee grilled NPR CEO Katherine Maher and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) CEO Paula Kerger over their anti-Trump bias and the extreme, woke programming on the stations.

This includes documentaries about transvestites and transitioning, “Racist Trees,” and exposing young children, including toddlers, to so-called educational programming that featured a cross-dressing freak.

Even more embarrassingly, in 2021, when she was the CEO of Wikimedia, she claimed the First Amendment was a “challenge” when it came to efforts to combat “disinformation,” and ‘reverence for the truth’ a ‘distraction.’

Maher stated, “The number one challenge here that we see is, of course, the First Amendment in the United States. [It] is a fairly robust protection of rights and that is a protection of rights both for platforms, which I actually think is very important that platforms have those rights to be able to regulate what kind of content they want on their sites.”

NPR’s CEO Katherine Maher: “Truth is a distraction from getting things done”

Our tax dollars fund this, @DOGE https://t.co/N60gECG3zO

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 24, 2024

Now, someone who considers the First Amendment a “challenge” is receiving a “First Amendment Award” from Harper’s Magazine.

Per Fox News:

“As president and CEO of NPR, Katherine Maher has guided one of America’s most important public media institutions through a period of extraordinary political, legal, and financial scrutiny, reaffirming journalism’s essential role in a democratic society,” the magazine said in a press release earlier this year about Maher receiving the James C. Goodale First Amendment Award on Oct. 26.

Harper’s Magazine also claimed that Maher led NPR “through a period of heightened scrutiny and challenge” along with “successfully battling” President Donald Trump’s efforts to defund NPR, though Congress still rescinded $1.1 billion in federal funding to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting in 2025.

Maher will be honored at the Foundation’s annual awards ceremony on October 26, 2026, in New York City.

Maher said about receiving the award, “Public media exists to serve the public interest, and I can think of no greater service to the public than the defense of the First Amendment.”

“The freedom, imagination, and initiative of all Americans flourish with its protections, so that we may better understand the world and one another. The compact of citizenship asks that we each step up to defend our constitutional rights if they are threatened. On behalf of NPR and the NPR Network, I am deeply honored to accept this award.”

The post Irony Alert: NPR CEO Who Said First Amendment is a “Challenge” to Receive ‘First Amendment Award’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

President Trump on Tuesday fired a warning to the Houthis after the terrorists fired missiles at Saudi Arabia’s King Khalid International Airport.

Twelve people died and hundreds were injured after the latest Houthi missile attack on Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport.

The airport shut down operations on Saturday as officials assessed the damage.

The US Government warned citizens to avoid Saudi Arabia’s King Khalid International Airport.

One US citizen died in the airport attack, officials said.

Full statement from Trump:

The Houthis are behaving very badly. I thought they learned their lesson a year ago when we bombed the HELL out of them and, at their request, stopped.

They’ve been silent for a long time, but now they’ve emerged again, probably at the behest of Iran, which is a Failing Nation, with No Navy, No Airforce, the World’s Worst Economy, and 301% Inflation, in a very nasty way, hitting Saudi Arabia, and purposefully trying to drive up Oil Prices, probably prior to the U.S. Elections — NOT NICE.

Somebody should explain to them that I’m not running in the Elections, I’ve already won, IN A MASSIVE LANDSLIDE, but I’ll be there after the Elections, and I will never forget! President DONALD J. TRUMP

President Trump was asked about the latest missile attack over the weekend.

Trump said the Saudi’s are able to defend themselves, but didn’t rule out getting involved.

WATCH:

President Trump on the Houthi attack on Riyadh’s airport:

They’re able to defend. look, the Saudis are good fighters. But I think the attack was a terrible thing. https://t.co/ErSyN0I0eC

— World Source News (@Worldsource24) October 11, 2026

The post President Trump Fires Warning Shot to Houthis After Latest Attacks on Saudi Airport appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Wow. Just wow. I’m stunned. I can’t even. This is horrifying. This cannot stand. #NoToShaneGillis.

Now can I have a gig, Hollywood? Sure, I can’t actually act, but neither can most people you hire these days. Given enough plastic surgery, I think I can be presentable enough for the camera.

And I have the reaction to anything a somewhat non-liberal celebrity does — this time, Shane Gillis — down pat. That seems to be the most important part, from what I can gather.

So, in case you missed it — and I tend to go out of my way to miss the show these days — “Saturday Night Live” had Gillis back on to host.

The comedian, who was hired for the cast of “SNL” and then fired before ever taping an episode due to some unwoke remarks in his comedy, has always made every monologue during his hosting career an event, for better or for worse.

I’d argue this Saturday was for worse, but that’s just because it wasn’t funny. This wasn’t Norm Macdonald-level stuff, to put it bluntly, including a bit on women’s gym wear which seemed to get people furious. (And by people, I mean minor celebs.)

“I haven’t been to the gym in so long, I didn’t know women just dress like w****s now?” he said.

“Look, I’m sorry, there’s no other way to describe– Have you seen it? I’ve seen it. The shorts. You’ve seen the shorts? They’re those neon, like, artificial bait-colored, and the wrinkles go around the cheeks and all combine at the b***hole. And don’t look! You’re not allowed to look.”

There was more about how he was fat, how he looked like a lesbian, how gay guys at the gym would take a pass on him, and so forth. Not incredibly hilarious, but also not offensive:

Shane Gillis’ monologue! https://t.co/ky6fVtWBx9

— Saturday Night Live (@nbcsnl) October 11, 2026

Anyhow, that gym bit got tout Hollywood in full outrage mode posthaste.

Most conspicuous was Dan Levy, a man who’s managed to escape the nepo-baby tag by writing, starring in, and directing “Schitt’s Creek,” although it’s worth noting that his (much more talented) dad Eugene had a large part in the show, too.

Anyhow, his reaction?

“I’m speechless,” delivered in a decidedly speech-like Instagram reel:

WARNING: The following video contains vulgar language that some viewers will find offensive.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Dan Levy (@instadanjlevy)

“I’m speechless that something like that can exist on live national television. And to be perfectly honest, more men need to be standing up in opposition to it because it’s complacency that has created the environment in which women are sexually assaulted and it’s a ‘conversation’ as opposed to a ‘crime,’” he said.

He went on to add that “men need to be defending women more.”

“This is not a women’s issue, this is an everybody issue. Because the more that men objectify women in the media, the more that other men see them as objects and treat them as objects,” he added.

“They are not objects. They are superior human beings to men, okay? And I’m sorry if this gets me in trouble with the internet, but f***.”

How dare you, Dan?

By using that vulgar verb for the sexual act, you’ve indicated that women should be objectified. Men, too, since you’re gay. #YesAllHumans.

I’m speechless. I’m absolutely speechless. I’m now going to make an 11-minute video about how speechless I am.

This sounds absurd, but this was basically the tenor of Hollywood Instagram, either on the comments to Levy’s video or in other corners of the platform. From The New York Times:

In a lengthy profanity-laced post about Gillis’s monologue, the comedian Phoebe Robinson asked, “Aren’t we tired? Aren’t we sick of this misogynistic, lazy ass, hack, mediocre, straight, male [expletive] disdain for women” that’s masked as comedy?… 

In the comments of Levy’s post, Viola Davis, Elizabeth Banks, Jewel, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Hannah Einbinder and Flavor Flav were among the celebrities voicing support. “Nailed it,” Banks wrote.

Is this what you saw? No? Welcome to Woke 2.0, spearheaded by censorious feminists of both genders.

If, to quote Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, “Woke 1 was crazy,” the sequel is going to be more focused, but every bit as stern and unforgiving.

What’s amazing is that all of these people have, in one way or another, done worse on screen. But that’s okay, because it’s woke nonsense.

Gillis’ monologue might not be his best material, but it still beats Dan Levy and Co. whining about this on social media and demanding someone’s head on a pike.

If this is still what happens when you make fun of one of their sacred cows, I suppose the only benefit here is that we all don’t care about Hollywood anymore. Maybe I shouldn’t be asking for a gig in a dying industry after all.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Woke Celebrities Are Crying About Shane Gillis’ ‘Saturday Night Live’ Monologue: ‘I’m Speechless’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.