According to The College Fix, “While every public higher education institution in New York is required by law to offer abortions, only nine offer prenatal care referrals.” Of these 78, City University of NY, as well as State University of NY, looked into nine that advertise referrals to the providers who offer parental care.

The National Postsecondary Student Aid study even found, according to The Fix, that more than 3,1 million undergrads are parenting, which is a shocking statistic in and of itself.

Despite this, only a few of the campus health centers in NY list support services like lactation rooms or childcare basic services for pregnant students or parents of young children.

One school, York College, offers childcare, and another, SUNY Old Westbury, advertises that they have a baby changing room.

Despite all this, none of these schools mention providing services like on-campus ultrasounds, parental care,as well as other such services. Only 9 even mention referral for these services.

Only one university, Westchester Community College, mentions on its website that it provides abortion resources, but does not provide parental care.

“Westchester Community College does not provide prenatal care on campus. The Health Services website will maintain a list of community agencies and/or providers authorized to prescribe abortion medication. Students will be referred to the Office of Accessibility Services for pregnancy or pregnancy-related accommodations,” the website states, followed by a list of local Planned Parenthood facilities and one independent abortion provider.”

On the other hand, according to The College Fix, The Fashion Institute of Technology, SUNY, which is made up of 82 percent female student body, does not mention parental care on its health services page. On the other hand, it does offer free acupuncture and massage therapy as if that’s essential health care.

As insane as all this is, perhaps even more surprising, or not surprising, being that we are talking about NY in 2023, this state passed a law that requires public colleges to provide abortion pills either at the school itself or through referrals. As crazy and evil as this sounds, it gets worse.

The law passed in NY makes unfounded claims such as abortion pills being safe for the Mother. It also differentiates this pill from the morning-after pill. The Students for Life of America rightfully said that more colleges and Universities should be providing support for pregnant and parenting students.

As to abortion pills, Students For Life is calling on the Surgeon General to include a warning about severe side effects.

Sadly, the pro-life culture has not taken over universities despite a conservative revival among Gen Z. The University remains an epicenter of liberalism and a pro-death culture.

The post 78 NY Colleges Provide Abortions appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Seven-Front Campaign That Redefined Deterrence.

This was a campaign born from the necessity of national survival. In June 2025, as Iran approached nuclear breakout and initiated coordinated proxy attacks, Israel launched a large-scale air campaign designed to neutralize the threat before it could be fully realized.

Pilots received encrypted alerts through secure command systems, ground forces coordinated via protected channels, and unmanned aerial systems operated with precision over high-value targets near Esfahan.

The objective was to prevent the operationalization of Iran’s nuclear capabilities. This action reflected the strategic imperative to eliminate existential threats in accordance with long-standing Israeli defense doctrine.

The Trigger: Enrichment Beyond the Threshold.

IAEA inspectors and Western intelligence confirmed in May 2025 that Iran possessed uranium enriched to sixty percent, approaching weapons-grade levels.

Diplomatic channels had stalled, and cyber sabotage had yielded diminishing returns. Israel executed surgical strikes against three categories of targets: the enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow, the centrifuge manufacturing hub at Esfahan, and newly reinforced bunkers near Kuh-e Kolang Gaz La.

These operations, supported by satellite imagery and electronic warfare assets, inflicted irreversible damage on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

The Collapse of the JCPOA and Strategic Doctrine.

The failure of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), originally built upon the 2013–2015 Joint Plan of Action (JPOA) under President Barack Obama, served as the strategic backdrop to Israel’s 2025 campaign.

Despite international monitoring mechanisms and phased sanctions relief, Iran methodically circumvented restrictions through proxy transfers, covert enrichment sites, and regional destabilization efforts. By 2025, Tehran had stockpiled enriched uranium and reconstructed its missile delivery architecture and hardened its nuclear infrastructure.

For Israel, the collapse of the Obama-era JPOA proved what it had long warned: diplomacy without enforceable red lines enables delay, not denial.

U.S. Caution Versus Israeli Urgency.

Despite public alignment with Israel’s right to defend itself, the Biden administration repeatedly signaled unease with Israeli escalation during 2024. Multiple senior Israeli officials alleged that Washington quietly urged restraint in potential strikes against Hamas, Hezbollah, and most notably Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

Intelligence leaks later confirmed that Iranian operatives had plotted to assassinate both a sitting presidential candidate and former President Donald J. Trump—a fact acknowledged by U.S. law enforcement and counterintelligence agencies by late 2024 (Department of Justice, 2024; ODNI, 2025).

Political Consensus and National Defense.

Internally, the Israeli cabinet invoked emergency national defense statutes under near-unanimous political consensus. This decision, endorsed by both coalition and opposition figures, reflected the broadest wartime unity since the 1973 Yom Kippur War (Haaretz, 2025). Despite internal turmoil over judicial reforms and civil-military tensions, the Iranian nuclear threat galvanized national priorities around survival and deterrence.

Decapitation Strategy: Neutralizing Iran’s Military Command.

Within five days, Israel struck more than 140 military sites. The list included IRGC missile depots in Kermanshah, S-300 and S-400 air-defense batteries near Tehran, and airbases at Mehrabad, Shiraz, and Mashhad. The campaign also eliminated Maj. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, Iran’s Chief of General Staff (Associated Press, 2025). These decapitation strikes, guided by Israeli HUMINT and drone surveillance, disrupted command continuity and paralyzed retaliatory planning. Among the dead were senior coordinators of Iran’s underground enrichment strategy and missile logistics network.

Proxy Collapse: The Limits of Iran’s Extended Reach.

Iran’s Axis of Resistance was activated in parallel. Hezbollah fired cross-border rockets from Lebanon, the Houthis targeted shipping in the Gulf of Aden, and Iraqi militias attacked U.S. forces with drones. Israeli and U.S. assets intercepted the majority of threats across all fronts. In the Gulf of Aqaba, U.S. Aegis-equipped destroyers and Israeli Iron Dome batteries jointly neutralized a salvo of cruise missiles launched from Yemen (Reuters, 2025b). In Lebanon, Iron Beam prototypes destroyed incoming UAVs near Kiryat Shmona.

Diplomatic Reverberations and Shifting Alliances.

Gulf States responded with quiet alignment. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain reinforced their own defenses but did not condemn Israel. Jordan and Egypt tightened security without taking sides. In contrast, the European Union and the United Nations condemned Israel for disproportionate force while failing to acknowledge Iran’s ballistic missile fire (EU Parliament, 2025; UN News, 2025; UN Security Council, 2025). Russia expressed symbolic support for Tehran, while China called for de-escalation (Xinhua, 2025).

Netanyahu’s Doctrine: Strategic Clarity Over Consensus.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had warned for decades about Iran’s nuclear ambitions. In 2025, he acted. His leadership coordinated air, land, sea, and cyber operations in a seven-front conflict that crippled Iran’s military and set back its nuclear timeline (Romero, 2025).

Divergent Assessments: Israel’s Urgency Versus U.S. Intelligence.

The 2025 U.S. Annual Threat Assessment judged Iran’s weapons program as dormant and several years from weaponization (ODNI, 2025). This came despite earlier warnings by Gen. Mark Milley and Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2023 and 2024 (Blinken, 2024; Holsey, 2025).

U.S. Military Lessons: Strike Doctrine, ISR, and Integrated Defense

Israel’s 2025 campaign offers six military lessons for U.S. planners: 1) Strike timing and doctrine eclipse warning signs. 2) Air superiority must be paired with internal disruption. 3) Ballistic missile defense must be proactive. 4) Multi-domain command and control must remain functional in isolation. 5) Deterrence is rebuilt by decisive action. 6) Intelligence remains the decisive domain (Fulton, 2024).

Conclusion: Deterrence Redefined and the Price of Delay.

Israel’s 2025 campaign reshaped the strategic landscape. It exposed the limits of diplomacy, reaffirmed the utility of preemption, and demonstrated the decisive role of intelligence-driven airpower. In the absence of a multilateral will, Israel acted alone and ensured its survival. Iran’s nuclear infrastructure has been degraded, but not eliminated. Tehran may pivot toward asymmetric retaliation and regional destabilization. The future balance of power in the Middle East will depend on whether Iran rebuilds, fractures, or adapts.

The post The Seven-Front War: How Israel Rewrote the Rules of Deterrence in 2025. appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio schooled CBS’s “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan over Iran’s nuclear program.

President Trump shocked the world on Saturday night after he announced the US bombed three Iranian nuclear sites.

“We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter,” Trump said on Truth Social on Saturday.

According to reports, the US dropped at least 6 30,000-pound bunker busting bombs on the Fordow nuclear plant. The US claims it totally obliterated the underground plant.

On Sunday morning, Margaret Brennan asked Rubio if the US had intelligence that the Supreme Leader of Iran had ordered weaponization of its nuclear program.

Rubio said that is irrelevant because Iran already had 60% enriched uranium

“Why do they have 60% enriched uranium?” Rubio said. “The only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons because they can quickly make it 90%!”

Margaret Brennan continued to push back on Rubio

WATCH:

MUST WATCH: @SecRubio schools Margaret Brennan on the Iranian regime’s nuclear program.

“Why do they have 60% enriched uranium? … The only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons because they can quickly make it 90%!” pic.twitter.com/XO8ol5jBIn

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 22, 2025

The post Rubio Schools Margaret Brennan on Iran’s Nuclear Program (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Iran’s parliament voted to approve the closure of the Strait of Hormuz in response to last night’s attacks on the country’s nuclear facilities by U.S. forces.

The Strait is used as a route for roughly 20% of the world’s oil shipping, which is expected to impact oil prices if the move is approved by Iran’s Supreme Council.

India, which reportedly imports about 80% of its oil through the Stair of Hormuz, is expected to be hit hard.

President Trump addressed the nation last night, hours after the attack, which he called a “spectacular military success.” He further threatened Iran that “there are many targets left” and “we will go after those other targets with precision, speed, and skill” if they retaliate.

Closing the Strait of Hormuz could be just one of the retaliatory measures Iran takes in response to the U.S. jumping into Israel’s war.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) responded to the attack, stating, “war starts right now.”

“War Starts Right Now”: Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Vows Retaliation After Trump Orders Bombing of Three Nuclear Sites

Many of the President's biggest and most loyal supporters are fearful that the President, who campaigned on stopping "forever wars," may have just started one.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded to the potential closure in an interview with Fox's Maria Bartiromo, saying the move would be "a massive escalation that would merit a response." He added, "We have responses available that are devastating."

WATCH:

Per the New York Post:

Iran’s parliament has voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, the vital shipping channel through which around 20% of the world’s daily oil flows.

The move, which could block $1 billion in oil shipments per day, is likely to send oil prices soaring.

It will come into effect pending a final decision by Iran’s Supreme Council.

The strait connecting the Gulf of Oman with the Persian Gulf is one of the world’s most critical chokepoints — just 20 miles wide at its narrowest point.

Shipping lanes in the strait  — the area that is deep enough for ships to pass — are even narrower at less than two miles wide in each direction, making them much more vulnerable to attacks and threats of closure.

The post JUST IN: Iran Expected to Close Strait of Hormuz, Blocking Access to Oil Routes for 20% of Global Oil Production – Marco Rubio Says Move Would be “a Massive Escalation that Would Merit a Response” (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

WTVJ-TV reported on May 22 that 45-year-old Matthew Moulton of Walla Walla, Washington, was placed under arrest after he sent Volusia County, Florida, Sheriff Mike Chitwood an email on March 20 in which he allegedly stated, “I’m going to have to threaten you with death. It’s coming. There’s nothing you can do to stop it.”

Police went to Moulton’s home that day where he told them he “believed the threats to be satirical and artistic and designed within the parameters of the First Amendment.”

According to WTVJ’s report, police believed probable cause existed to arrest Moulton for the email, charging him with a felony for written or electronic threats to kill or do bodily injury.

A warrant for his arrest was put out March 31. Florida officials took him into custody on May 21.

Moulton was escorted down the airport escalator upon arriving in Florida. Who was waiting for him at the bottom? Chitwood.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by NBC 6 South Florida (@nbc6)

“Matthew, I’m Sheriff Chitwood. I’m the guy you want to kill, and there’s nothing I can do about it,” Chitwood said to a clearly stunned Moulton.

“Challenge accepted,” he told Moulton. “I sent you a sermon,” Moulton said, trying to explain away his actions.

“But, you do know in Florida, a written threat to kill is a felony,” the sheriff explained. “Just so you know, I’m the one who made sure you came back, and I hope you enjoy your stay,” Chitwood quipped.

“I will also tell you that you will not see Mickey Mouse on this trip, and you have to reimburse us for your flight here and your stay at the county jail,” he told Moulton.

“Why don’t you look me in the eye and tell me why you want me dead?” Chitwood challenged him as Moulton was clearly flustered and did not anticipate having to confront the man he allegedly threatened over the internet.

“I am a Christian,” Moulton told him, as if this somehow justified his alleged crimes. “So am I,” Chitwood responded.

Moulton then told Chitwood this could not be true, citing 1 Corinthians and telling Chitwood, “Because in Corinthians it says bondsmen are not Christian!”

According to an affidavit referenced by WFLA-TV, Moulton sent the email to Chitwood from Washington after the sheriff began a campaign in 2024 to make mugshots and perp walks public for students who falsely called in school shootings.

The entire video is incredibly amusing in seeing a tough guy behind a computer screen get flustered and face the consequences of his actions.

Moulton clearly did not anticipate seeing Chitwood as his welcoming party and had no real answer for why he did what he did.

All that talk on the internet did not amount to much in-person.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Watch: Punk Who Threatened Sheriff’s Life Gets Nasty Surprise When Sheriff Spots Him, Walks Up, and Says ‘Challenge Accepted’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.