President Trump Sends Warning to Lindsey Graham and Mike Pompeo For Going to Ukraine and Provoking Ukrainians to Keep Fighting Russia (VIDEO)
June 20, 2025
President Trump warned Senator Lindsey Graham and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for going to Ukraine and encouraging them to continue fighting Russia.
“Lindsey Graham and Mike Pompeo were on the ground in Ukraine, trying to provoke Ukrainians to keep fighting. What do you think of that?” a reporter asked President Trump after he touched down in New Jersey.
Trump warned Lindsey Graham and Pompeo to be careful about what they say.
“People have to be very careful with what they say. Their mouth could get them into a lot of trouble.”
WATCH:
Reporter: “Lindsey Graham and Mike Pompeo were on the ground in Ukraine, trying to provoke Ukrainians to keep fighting. What do you think of that?”
President Trump: “People have to be very careful with what they say. Their mouth could get them into a lot of trouble.” pic.twitter.com/GZz1pkQzwG
As TGP recently reported, Volodymyr Zelensky announced that 117 drones were used in the strike inside Russia that wiped out dozens of nuclear “doomsday” bombers and other aircraft.
President Trump WAS NOT NOTIFIED of the attack before it took place – because Trump wants peace and the globalists want World War and the destruction of Russia.
Senator Lindsey Graham, who was in Ukraine just two days before Zelensky’s drone strikes, cheered the news of the attack.
What did Lindsey Graham say to Zelensky during his visit to Ukraine last month?
The ever-resourceful Ukraine used creative drone warfare tactics to successfully attack Russian bombers and military assets used to kill Ukrainian citizens and destroy their country.
Russia indiscriminately kills men, women and children. It’s time for the world to act… https://t.co/F7BleLFody
Mike Pompeo also traveled to Ukraine shortly before its drone attack on Russia.
As President Trump continues to push for peace negotiations in the Ukraine-Russian War, Mike Pompeo flew to Ukraine to push “complete victory” over the Russian people in his talk this weekend at the Black Sea Security Forum.
Steve Bannon previously called for Lindsay Graham to be arrested if he doesn’t stop traveling to Kiev behind Trump’s back and engaging in shadow diplomacy with Zelensky.
To bomb or not to bomb: The Debate Over Attacking Iran
June 20, 2025
Islamic Republic of Iran Army soldiers and pilots marching in front of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (former deputy commander-in-chief of the Army of Iran) and highest ranking commanders of Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran during Islamic Republic of Iran Army Day.
As President Donald Trump weighs whether to deploy American military force against Iran’s nuclear facilities within the next two weeks, the conservative movement finds itself locked in its most consequential foreign policy debate since the Iraq War.
On one side, those in favor of escalation argue this moment represents America’s last realistic chance to prevent a nuclear-armed theocracy from reshaping the Middle East balance of power.
On the other, voices warn that another Middle Eastern intervention could shatter Trump’s “America First” coalition and drag the nation into an endless conflict that serves foreign interests over American ones.
The stakes of this internal debate extend far beyond party politics.
Trump’s decision will either validate the traditional Republican foreign policy establishment’s belief that American global leadership requires decisive military action against existential threats, or cement the ascendance of a new isolationist wing that views overseas entanglements as fundamentally contrary to national interests.
With Iran potentially months away from nuclear weapons capability, the choice Trump makes in the coming days may determine not only the future of the Middle East, but the ideological direction of American conservatism for the next generation.
Conservative foreign policy veterans view the current moment as a strategic gift that may never be repeated. With Israeli forces having already degraded Iran’s air defense systems and exposed nuclear facilities to attack, supporters of military action argue that waiting would be tantamount to accepting an Iranian bomb.
“A nuclear Iran is dangerous for peace and stability, not just in the Middle East, but throughout the world,” argues Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), who backs any presidential decision to strike Iranian nuclear facilities.
Lawler’s position reflects a broader conservative belief that Iranian nuclear weapons would trigger an unstoppable regional arms race, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt rushing to develop their own nuclear arsenals to counter Tehran’s influence.
Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has been even more explicit in his advocacy, telling Trump in a private phone call, “This is a historic moment. Four presidents have promised that they won’t get a nuclear weapon on your watch. You can fulfill that promise.”
Graham’s message to the president was unambiguous: “If diplomacy fails… help Israel finish the job. Give them bombs, fly with them if necessary… If you want to convince international terrorism we mean business, you’ve got to finish the job with Iran.”
The Heritage Foundation has consistently identified Iran’s radical Islamist regime as the greatest long-term Middle Eastern threat to the United States and its allies.
Hawks argue that Israel’s initial strike demonstrated air superiority and inflicted serious damage on nuclear infrastructure that took decades to develop. While Israeli forces can cripple these facilities, only American bunker-busting capabilities can destroy deeply buried targets.
Military analysts warn that delaying further action would give Iran time to rebuild its air defenses, disperse nuclear assets, and potentially cross the nuclear threshold before such an opportunity arises again.
The credibility argument still resonates with traditional conservatives. As one Republican policy expert noted, both allies and adversaries are watching to see whether decades of U.S. promises to stop Iran’s nuclear program were serious commitments or just empty rhetoric.
Hawks argue that failure to act would signal a broader American retreat from global leadership at a time when China and Russia are openly challenging the international order.
But this consensus now faces mounting resistance from Trump’s base. Influential conservative voices who helped elect him are questioning whether Israeli security interests align with America’s.
Tucker Carlson has warned against supporting what he calls the “war-hungry government” of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.
“If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so,” Carlson said. “But not with America’s backing,” adding it could “fuel the next generation of terrorism” and cost American lives “in the name of a foreign agenda.”
Even staunch pro-Israel figures like Charlie Kirk acknowledge the shift: “Our MAGA base does not want a war at all. They do not want U.S. involvement.” On Capitol Hill, skepticism is growing. Senator Rand Paul stated, “It’s not the U.S.’ job to be involved in this war,” and Representative Thomas Massie declared, “This is not our war. We should not engage our military here.”
President Trump now stands between two competing visions of conservatism. While reportedly open to using U.S. military assets to strike Iranian nuclear facilities, he remains cautious about being drawn into another Middle East war, and deeply attuned to the political risks within his own base.
His decision will shape whether the GOP continues to follow the “peace through strength” doctrine championed by Heritage Foundation scholars or adopts a more restrained approach focused on domestic priorities over global commitments.
In a Middle East region increasingly defined by nuclear rivalry and proxy warfare, that philosophical choice may prove as consequential as any military strike.
Wife of Minnesota Assassin ‘Disappeared’ After Being Caught with Guns and Stash of Cash
June 20, 2025
The wife of suspected assassin Vance Boelter has mysteriously disappeared after being caught fleeing with firearms, thousands in cash, and their children, the Daily Mail reported.
Jenny Boelter, 51, president of the couple’s private security company, Praetorian Guard, vanished from public view just hours after her husband, Vance, launched a premeditated rampage that left two prominent Democrat politicians dead and two others fighting for their lives.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Jenny Boelter was detained and questioned during a traffic stop that revealed a cache of alarming items in her possession, including a gun, ammunition, large amounts of cash, and multiple passports.
According to a report by KSTP-TV, the vehicle carrying Jenny Boelter and three other family members was stopped outside a convenience store near Onamia, Minnesota, around 10 a.m. Saturday morning — just hours after authorities launched a manhunt for her husband.
According to the Daily Mail, at 6:18 AM Saturday, Jenny received a haunting text message from her husband: “Dad went to war last night. There’s gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger happy and I don’t want you guys around.”
That same morning, she fled the family’s $520,000 farmhouse in Green Isle, Minnesota—leaving behind the family dogs, several vehicles, and a stunned neighborhood. She placed just one call to friends, claiming she was in a “safe place,” but refused to give any details. She has not been heard from since.
When Daily Mail reporters sought answers from her family, her brother Jason Doskocil had a blunt message: “Piss off.”
New court filings suggest this was no spur-of-the-moment escape. Vance and Jenny Boelter were reportedly “preppers” with detailed contingency plans. In fact, the feds say Vance had given Jenny a “bailout plan” to follow if disaster struck — and it appears she might have tried to carry it out.
The federal complaint reveals that at some point, “Boelter had given his wife ‘a bailout plan’” to flee to a relative’s residence in Wisconsin should a disaster unfold. Part of “prepping” includes “anticipating” and adapting to “impending conditions of calamity,” according to a study cited by the National Library of Medicine.
The court filing was written during Boelter’s 43-hour evasion from law enforcement under the belief he may have fled Minnesota following the pair of shootings that killed Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband and injured state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. He was later taken into custody in a field in Green Isle, Minn.
Police stopped Boelter’s wife, along with her four children, more than 100 miles northwest of the family’s home late Saturday morning, according to the complaint and the Mille Lacs County Sheriff. The stop occurred well over 150 miles northwest of the destination of the “bailout plan.”
In a search of the vehicle, officers found a safe, passports for each of the kids and Boelter, at least $10,000 and a pair of pistols in the glove box and inside a cooler. The filing notes Boelter had recently sent the family a group text proclaiming he had gone to war and people with guns may be showing up to their house.
The complaint, unsealed by a federal judge Wednesday, offers the latest detail into Boelter’s life that was punctuated with a non-linear career jumping from food service to international missionary work, local political appointments and funeral homes. An exact motive for the shootings has yet to be announced.
Sean Diddy ‘Combs’ Trial: Prosecution To Rest Its Case on Monday – Jury Sees Images of FBI Raids, With ‘Guns, Drugs, Baby Oil and Lube’ – Alleged ‘Drug Mule’ Testifies
June 20, 2025
Diddy’s trial is coming to an end.
The high-profile, high-stakes sex-trafficking trial is drawing to a close, as the prosecution is expected to rest their case next Monday, and the defense has stated that it’ll need as little as two days to present their case – a potential sign that they’re confident of his acquittal.
But there may still be some bumps in the road ahead before the jury can sit and deliberate.
One juror has been dismissed due to concerns about his candor, suspected of lying to get in the panel.
And there’s a second juror that the judge flagged potential misconduct, suspected of improperly discussing the case with a former colleague.
No final decision has been made about removing that second juror, but that could come ahead.
Diddy is facing life in prison, but his lawyers appear optimistic of his acquittal.
Diddy has been accused of running a decade-long criminal scheme to control and manipulate – via threats or violence – women into ‘freak-offs’, sex marathons that would last days.
The disgraced rap mogul pleaded not guilty to the charges of sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation to engage in prostitution.
If convicted, Diddy could get life in prison.
Watch: The full unedited video of Diddy beating Cassie in a hotel in Los Angeles as she tried to flee a ‘freak-off’.
The full unedited 15-minute video of Diddy and Cassie’s hotel fight in Los Angeles was released.https://t.co/n25GxFGEbP
“Jaw-dropping evidence photos released from the Diddy trial give a twisted look inside his Los Angeles mansion — which was replete with drugs, guns and a treasure trove of baby oil and lube.”
Also today, Diddy’s alleged ‘drug mule’, his ‘personal assistant’ Brendan Paul finished his testimony.
“The former Syracuse University basketball player told the jury that he would clean up messes from Diddy’s ‘freak-off’ sex marathons, and bought a variety of drugs for the music mogul once a month — but contended he was ‘absolutely not’ Diddy’s ‘drug mule’.”
“Next in the witness stand was Special agent Joseph Cerciello, whose testimony will likely take up the whole day Monday before the prosecution case concludes.”
Defense’s Marc Agnifilo said that their case is expected to be a day or two long, and testimony could be finished as on Tuesday or Wednesday.
“F*ck Americans” – BREAKING: State Department Visa Specialist FIRED After Admitting to Helping Illegals Evade Deportation (VIDEO)
June 20, 2025
A US State Department visa specialist was caught on undercover camera admitting to helping illegal aliens evade deportation.
Arlsan Akhtar told the O’Keefe Media Group undercover reporter that he secretly advises illegal aliens on how to evade deportation, mocked Americans, slammed Jews and other ethnic groups and immigrants.
“I do say it to cab drivers that are from, like, Hispanic descent, I’m like, ‘don’t talk to the police.’ Don’t admit the truth… If you want a loophole, keep your mouth shut,” Arslan Akhtar said.
Akhtar said he hates Yemenis, Bangladeshi people and Jews: “I hate them [Yemenis] with a passion. They’re such awful people in the application process. They are the most conniving group of folks, next to Indians… Oh, Bangladeshi people, they’re awful.”
He also slammed white Americans: “When they talk to you, they talk to you like you’re lower than them… It’s a culture of hatred… a culture of dominance. They feel like they have the right to dominate everybody, to claim Greenland, to claim Canada, to claim Israel.”
Akhtar also expressed his hatred for Elon Musk and said he wants to see him lynched: “I would prefer him to be dragged out of the building with his hair plugs… and lynched on the street. We need a public justice, I think. That’s really what we need. We need a healthy dose of public justice.”
WATCH:
‘F*CK AMERICANS, F*CK ISRAEL’: US State Dept. Visa Specialist Admits to Helping Illegals Evade Deportation: “Don’t Admit the Truth, Don’t Tell Them What You Did”
“I do say it to cab drivers that are from, like, Hispanic descent. I’m like, ‘don’t talk to the police’… If you… pic.twitter.com/RUPSmUwJFv
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
