Trump Threatens European Officials With Travel Ban for ‘Digital Services Act’, as Well as Tariffs for Other Countries ‘Discriminating’ Against American Tech Companies

Trump Threatens European Officials With Travel Ban for ‘Digital Services Act’, as Well as Tariffs for Other Countries ‘Discriminating’ Against American Tech Companies

Trump Threatens European Officials With Travel Ban for ‘Digital Services Act’, as Well as Tariffs for Other Countries ‘Discriminating’ Against American Tech Companies
August 26, 2025

Trump is working to defend US tech companies, putting all Countries with Digital Taxes, Legislation, Rules, or Regulations on notice.

Trump puts European officials and others on blast.

The Donald J. Trump administration is mulling a US ‘travel ban’ for the European Union officials that are responsible for the bloc’s Digital Services Act, as well as considering ‘additional tariffs’ on countries with similar laws, which Trump says ‘discriminate against American companies’.

The Telegraph reported:

“The State Department is considering placing sanctions which may come in the form of visa restrictions on those behind the legislation as the US government continues to fight against what it sees as an attempt to silence conservative voices.

US officials held a meeting on the issue last week and are yet to make a decision on whether to press ahead with the sanctions.”

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said that Digital Taxes, Digital Services Legislation, and Digital Markets Regulations ‘are all designed to harm, or discriminate against, American Technology’.

“As the President of the United States, I will stand up to Countries that attack our incredible American Tech Companies. Digital Taxes, Digital Services Legislation, and Digital Markets Regulations are all designed to harm, or discriminate against, American Technology. They also, outrageously, give a complete pass to China’s largest Tech Companies.

This must end, and end NOW! With this TRUTH, I put all Countries with Digital Taxes, Legislation, Rules, or Regulations, on notice that unless these discriminatory actions are removed, I, as President of the United States, will impose substantial additional Tariffs on that Country’s Exports to the U.S.A., and institute Export restrictions on our Highly Protected Technology and Chips. America, and American Technology Companies, are neither the “piggy bank” nor the “doormat” of the World any longer. Show respect to America and our amazing Tech Companies or, consider the consequences! Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

The US has reportedly directed its diplomats in Europe to launch a lobbying campaign to oppose the Digital Services Act.

“US Secretary of State Marco Rubio previously threatened visa bans for people who ‘censor’ speech by Americans, including on social media, and suggested the policy could target foreign officials regulating US tech companies.”

The UK Labour Government is also under fire for the ‘Online Safety Act’, seen as ‘Orwellian’.

During his visit to Scotland last month, Trump heard British Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended the bill, and insist that the UK would protect free speech.

“It comes as Nigel Farage prepares to tell [imprisoned for a tweet] Lucy Connolly’s story when he testifies to members of Congress in September about threats to freedom of expression in Britain.”

Read more:

Trump Administration Warns UK’s Censorship-Mad PM Starmer Not to Threaten US Tech Companies With His ‘Online Safety Act’

The post Trump Threatens European Officials With Travel Ban for ‘Digital Services Act’, as Well as Tariffs for Other Countries ‘Discriminating’ Against American Tech Companies appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Paul Serran

ABLECHILD: I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother — The Essay That Packaged Sandy Hook

ABLECHILD: I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother — The Essay That Packaged Sandy Hook

ABLECHILD: I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother — The Essay That Packaged Sandy Hook
August 26, 2025

I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother — The Essay That Packaged Sandy Hook

Republished with permission from AbleChild.

In the 13 years since the tragedy at Sandy Hook, public debate has centered around a familiar argument: was the massacre the result of an underfunded mental-health system, or the product of a failed mental health model that relies on fraudulent diagnosis and drugging? Soon after the shooting, The Huffington Post ran an essay entitled I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother that garnered national attention, but contrary to the essay, the real story is not about a mental health debate but, rather, a murderous record built on contradiction, secrecy, and concealment.

At the center of the Sandy Hook story stands Nancy Lanza, remembered as the mother of a killer, yet, in truth, a parent caught in the fraud of psychiatric diagnosing and drugging, following the industry’s rules until compliance became dangerous and  threatening. Lanza’s story—sealed in court records, rewritten by investigators, and recast by media—speaks not of clarity, but of institutions protecting themselves.

Psychiatrists who prescribed Adam Lanza’s medications were shielded from scrutiny, and whose names were suspiciously withheld for more than a year. Adam Lanza’s psychiatrist, Dr. Paul Fox, who destroyed all records of care for Lanza, fled the country during the investigation and was later arrested on charges of sexual misconduct and returned to the United States. How such a central figure in Lanza’s treatment was allowed to flee the country during this  most critical investigative period remains unanswered. Another, Dr. Robert King at Yale University, was soliciting children for psychiatric research while treating Lanza with mind-altering drugs. Investigators never examined this conflict.

AbleChild sought Lanza’s medical and autopsy records in court, but the state of Connecticut blocked the release, intimating that people would stop taking medications if the files were released. Those files remain sealed, ensuring the psychopharma industry continues to be spared any accountability for its role in the murderous attack.

The viral essay written in the Huffington Post,  I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother,  received national attention. The sympathetic article portrayed the pain of raising a troubled child and pleaded for compassion. What the article ignored were the contradictions in the official case and the failures of the behavioral health systems surrounding Nancy and Adam.

From the beginning, the investigation revealed inconsistencies an AR-15 was recovered and declared the weapon used in the shooting. Forensic files linking bullets to weapons remain incomplete and questionable. DNA and fingerprint data do not support official events raising many questions about Nancy’s death. Of interest is that the DNA evidence pulled from the death scene at the Lanza home matches a convicted felon DNA profile and yet the Connecticut State Police have never followed up on that lead or made those efforts public. The police never explained how a convicted felon’s DNA got inside the Lanza home and on evidence important to the shooting at Sandy Hook. Why?

And, even more bizarre is that there was another DNA profile at the Lanza home on the .22 caliber Rifle allegedly used by Adam Lanza to kill his mother that the Police could not match. In fact, Nancy and Adam Lanza were eliminated as contributors on the tested .22 caliber Rifle and cartridges.

It should be further noted that the FBI report reflects that none of the recovered bullet evidence collected from the Sandy Hook school crime scene could be matched to the AR-15 allegedly used by Adam Lanza. Literally hundreds of bullets and bullet fragments were taken for testing by the FBI. None could be matched with the alleged weapon. Apparently, no one found this odd. Even the families of the deceased never questioned this. Why? Every. Single. Bullet. Fragment. Does. Not. Match. The. Alleged. Weapon. What are the odds?

Moving along, Nancy’s personal diary was never released. Accounts describe it as a record of her fears, her search for treatment, and what services Adam was receiving. Rather than release the diary, the state fought to keep it sealed. The public was left with only the state’s interpretation of what the diary contained. Nancy’s own words, perhaps the most critical first-hand evidence, remain locked away.

The corruption context made the omissions harder to ignore. A firearm was moved at the crime scene. The Newtown Police Department, at the center of the case, faced its own scandals: officers implicated in importing drugs from China and selling long guns out of the station. Medical oversight failed too. The Medical Examiner’s assistant allowed her husband unauthorized access to Adam’s body, breaking chain of custody. Toxicology offered no credibility. Adam’s urine sample, tested for marijuana, was recorded as so badly compromised upon arrival that no results could be trusted—yet it was still released as official fact.

What we know of Nancy’s conflict with psychiatry comes mainly from the police report. That document says Dr. King labeled her “non-compliant” with Adam’s medications. But Nancy had advised Dr. King that Adam was suffering serious side effects from the drugs prescribed. King never filed an FDA MedWatch report and never informed Lanza that she could file with MedWatch. Instead, Lanza’s judgment was reduced to medical disobedience being “non-compliant.”

The “non-compliant” label misrepresents Lanza’s reality. As a mother, Lanza had never been resistant to getting help for Adam. She had become the poster mom for America’s pharmaceutical model: comply, try one drug, then another, adjust the dosage, or combine them, always trusting the authority of doctors with a prescription pad. Lanza followed faithfully for years, hoping the model would bring relief.

When compliance itself became dangerous, Lanza stopped. Nancy Lanza’s complaints were written off as “non-compliance,” a term used to protect psychiatry from responsibility.

The viral essay I am Adam Lanza’s Mother turned Lanza’s story into evidence for more mental health services and greater compliance. The essay never raised the dangers associated with over-treatment, trial-and-error prescribing, or medical negligence. Lanza’s own experience with Adam embodied those dangers. Lanza was a mother who followed the rules, saw them fail, and was condemned when she resisted further harm.

AbleChild drew the opposite conclusion. The organization’s parents rejected blind adherence to the pharmaceutical model and demanded transparency. After the shootings AbleChild, not the state, pressed for disclosure of Nancy’s records in court. AbleChild was denied the records, but its stand highlighted what Nancy was never given: recognition that the system had failed her and her son.

What emerges from the Sandy Hook record is not clarity but crisis at every level. Psychiatrists shielded. Records sealed. Forensics contradictions. Nancy’s diary suppressed. Evidence mishandled. Police corruption. Autopsy chain of custody broken. Toxicology compromised. Each institution acted not to reveal the truth, but to guard itself.

I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother invited sympathy for overwhelmed parents. It offered compassion, but it does not explain what went wrong with the institutions tasked with helping Nancy Lanza. If left as the final word, it distorts her story.

The murders at Sandy Hook school cannot be understood until the sealed psychiatric files, the diary, the autopsy report of Adam Lanza, and the flawed DNA forensic records are completed and released to the public. Until then, one of the most brutal crimes in American history remains one of the least investigated.  Photo Credit: David Goldman/AP

Be the Voice for the Voiceless

AbleChild is a 501(3) C nonprofit organization that has recently co-written landmark legislation in Tennessee, setting a national precedent for transparency and accountability in the intersection of mental health, pharmaceutical practices, and public safety.

What you can do.  Sign the Petition calling for federal hearings!

Donate! Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded. Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive.  As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives.

The post ABLECHILD: I Am Adam Lanza’s Mother — The Essay That Packaged Sandy Hook appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Joe Hoft

President Trump Breaks His Silence on the Ongoing Cracker Barrel Controversy

President Trump Breaks His Silence on the Ongoing Cracker Barrel Controversy

President Trump Breaks His Silence on the Ongoing Cracker Barrel Controversy
August 26, 2025

Credit: Gage Skidmore/Flickr

President Trump added his voice to the ongoing national controversy surrounding the once-great Cracker Barrel.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Cracker Barrel’s woke CEO Julie Felss Masino sparked a social media uproar after making an infuriating change to an iconic part of the restaurant chain.

On Tuesday, the company announced that it was replacing its 47-year-old logo as part of an attempted $700 million rebrand. The old logo shows the restaurant name next to a man sitting on a chair and leaning on a barrel.

Now, the only thing left is the name. No more man and barrel.

Trump believes enough is enough and that Cracker Barrel should return to basics, beginning with the old logo. He wrote that the company has an excellent opportunity to turn its fortunes around, noting his near-assassination a year ago.

“Cracker Barrel should go back to the old logo, admit a mistake based on customer response (the ultimate Poll), and manage the company better than ever before,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “They got a Billion Dollars worth of free publicity if they play their cards right. Very tricky to do, but a great opportunity. Have a major News Conference today.”

“Make Cracker Barrel a WINNER again,” he added. “Remember, in just a short period of time I made the United States of America the “HOTTEST” Country anywhere in the World. One year ago, it was “DEAD.”

“Good luck!”

Trump is correct that returning to the new logo would be a great start, but this step alone may not completely satisfy the public.

Since the uproar started, the restaurant chain has doubled down despite the overwhelming negative reaction from the public. The corporate executives have even changed their classic peg game in an effort to be more politically correct.

Moreover, recent evidence has emerged showing how deep the wokeness rot is at Cracker Barrel. On Friday, conservative activist Robby Starbuck released a video exposing how involved the company has been with far-left LGBTQ and DEI activists for years.

For example, Cracker Barrel is so committed to these causes that the company has received several awards from despicable groups like the Human Rights Campaign, which pushes for pronoun usage and transgenderism in the workplace. The company has also worked with groups that support illegal aliens and hate Trump.

It’s possible that the company may have already permanently damaged its reputation.

The post President Trump Breaks His Silence on the Ongoing Cracker Barrel Controversy appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cullen Linebarger

Outrageous: Circuit Court Rules that Tossing Away Mail-in Ballots with Missing or Incorrect Dates Violates the Constitution

Outrageous: Circuit Court Rules that Tossing Away Mail-in Ballots with Missing or Incorrect Dates Violates the Constitution

Outrageous: Circuit Court Rules that Tossing Away Mail-in Ballots with Missing or Incorrect Dates Violates the Constitution
August 26, 2025

Photo credit: depositphotos.com

Democrat judges have now made it easier to commit mass voter fraud and steal elections.

As Bloomberg Law reported, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday that Pennsylvania’s requirement that mail-in ballots with missing or incorrect dates be tossed violates the United States Constitution.

“Weighing the burden that practice imposes on Pennsylvanians’ constitutional right to vote against the State’s interest in the practice, the balance of the scales leads us to hold that it does not comply with our Constitution,” said Chief Judge D. Brooks Smith in an opinion for the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

“The date requirement seems to hamper rather than facilitate election efficiency,” he added. “By its nature, it fails to add solemnity to the process of voting,” Smith wrote. “And discarding thousands of ballots every election is not a reasonable trade-off in view of the date requirement’s extremely limited and unlikely capacity to detect and deter fraud.”

The decision was 3-0. The judges who issued this insane ruling were Patty Shwartz, appointed by Barack Obama; Arianna J. Freeman, appointed by Joe Biden; and D. Brooks Smith, appointed by President George W. Bush.

As far-left Democracy Docket notes, this lawsuit stems from one in 2022 challenging the state’s orders to county boards of elections not to count a mail-in ballot that was supposedly cast on time but missing a date, or containing the wrong date on the outer return envelopes.

Federal District Court Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, a President Trump appointee, ruled that the guidance was unconstitutional because it placed “constitutionally impermissible burdens on the right to vote.”

This decision will undoubtedly have grave consequences for local Pennsylvania offices and national elections. The Keystone State, after all, is one of seven >critical swing states that decide the Presidency.

Tuesday’s decision came after the court denied the Republican National Committee’s (RNC) request to stay the lower court’s decision until after the 2025 elections. This year, Pennsylvanians will vote in several critical judicial races, including the State Supreme Court, and special elections to fill vacant legislative seats.

In their motion seeking a stay, the RNC pointed out that the mistaken mail-in ballot margin has determined several key races.

The Gateway Pundit has extensively reported on how mail-in voting swings elections toward Democrats. This often happens in the dead of the night.

Trump has vowed to eliminate mail-in voting, saying “If you don’t have mail-in voting, you’re not going to have many Democrats get elected.”

The post Outrageous: Circuit Court Rules that Tossing Away Mail-in Ballots with Missing or Incorrect Dates Violates the Constitution appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cullen Linebarger

BREAKING: Judge Throws Out Trump Lawsuit Against All 15 of Maryland’s Judges Over Their Unlawful Practice of Issuing “Automatic Injunctions” to Stop Deportations of Criminal Aliens

BREAKING: Judge Throws Out Trump Lawsuit Against All 15 of Maryland’s Judges Over Their Unlawful Practice of Issuing “Automatic Injunctions” to Stop Deportations of Criminal Aliens

BREAKING: Judge Throws Out Trump Lawsuit Against All 15 of Maryland’s Judges Over Their Unlawful Practice of Issuing “Automatic Injunctions” to Stop Deportations of Criminal Aliens
August 26, 2025

A federal judge on Tuesday tossed out a lawsuit President Trump filed against the entire Maryland federal bench over their unlawful practice of issuing “automatic injunctions” to stop deportations of criminal aliens.

US District Judge Thomas Cullen, a Trump appointee, tossed out President Trump’s lawsuit after appearing skeptical during a hearing earlier this month.

“Much as the Executive fights the characterization, a lawsuit by the executive branch of government against the judicial branch for the exercise of judicial power is not ordinary. The Executive’s lawsuit will be dismissed, and its motion for preliminary injunction denied as moot. Whatever the merits of its grievance with the judges of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, the Executive must find a proper way to raise those concerns,” Judge Cullen wrote in a 37-page opinion.

In June Trump’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sued the entire federal district court bench in Maryland on Tuesday evening over an order blocking deportations of criminal aliens.

The lawsuit was filed after the US District Court for the District of Maryland issued an order that required the clerk to automatically enter an injunction against removing any illegal alien who challenges their deportation and files a habeas petition.

“This lawsuit involves yet another regrettable example of the unlawful use of equitable powers to restrain the Executive. Specifically, Defendants have instituted an avowedly automatic injunction against the federal government, issued outside the context of any particular case or controversy. They did so by promulgating a standing order (“Standing Order”) and amended standing order (“Amended Standing Order”; together, “Orders”) that require the court clerk to automatically enter an injunction against removing, or changing the legal status of, any alien detained in Maryland who files a habeas petition,” the lawsuit against the judges said.

“Defendants’ automatic injunction issues whether or not the alien needs or seeks emergency relief, whether or not the court has jurisdiction over the alien’s claims, and no matter how frivolous the alien’s claims may be,” the lawsuit said.

“Unbelievably, an injunction automatically issues even if an immigration attorney files a habeas petition in Maryland incorrectly stating that the illegal alien is detained in Maryland, when the illegal alien is actually detained in Texas. (This literally happened.),” Chad Mizelle, Chief of Staff to the Department of Justice said.

“Automatic injunctions flagrantly violate Supreme Court precedent. In the Court’s words, an injunction is never “a matter of right.” But the Maryland federal district court offers immediate injunctions, as “a matter of right,” to any illegal alien who files in its court,” he said.

The post BREAKING: Judge Throws Out Trump Lawsuit Against All 15 of Maryland’s Judges Over Their Unlawful Practice of Issuing “Automatic Injunctions” to Stop Deportations of Criminal Aliens appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cristina Laila