Caitlin Clark Wins MVP as the US Women’s Basketball Team Wins FIBA Event in Puerto Rico
March 18, 2026
Caitlin Clark is back. The US Women’s basketball team went 5-0 and won the FIBA Women’s Basketball Event in Puerto Rico yesterday. Caitlin Clark took home the MVP award. After … Read more
Norway Prosecutor Asks for Over 7 Years in Prison for Crown Princess’ Son, Marius Hoiby, Charged With Raping Four Women
March 18, 2026
Marius Borg Hoiby is on trial for rape, assault and other offenses.
Epstein friend Crown Princess Mette-Marit and her son have caused massive reputational damage to the Norwegian royals.
The trial of the son of Norway’s crown princess is proceeding, and expected to end tomorrow (19), with the prosecution now arguing that he should be sentenced to seven years and seven months in prison.
He is charged with raping four women, as well as with domestic abuse and other crimes.
BREAKING:
The Norwegian Prosecutor’s Office has requested more than 7 years in prison for Marius Borg Høiby.
Norwegian Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s son is on trial for multiple counts of rape, domestic violence, assault and possession of 3.5 kg (7.7 pounds) of marijuana pic.twitter.com/s3grCS8LAQ
“Marius Borg Hoiby, 29, who joined the royal family when his mother Mette-Marit married Crown Prince Haakon in 2001, has pleaded not guilty to the most severe accusations against him, including those of rape, while admitting to some lesser charges.
The seven-week trial, which is due to end on Thursday, has transfixed the Nordic country, detailing Hoiby’s drug addiction, self-made videos of sexual encounters and more than 800 electronic messages entered into evidence.”
Royal trouble: Martius Borg and the Crown Princess Mette-Marit .
While her son faces years in prison, Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s had to apologize for her ‘poor judgment’ in keeping close ties with late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, even after he was convicted for sex crimes in 2008.
These two events badly hurt the overall popularity of the Norwegian monarchy.
Royalty hurting over mother and son scandals.
“Lead prosecutor Sturla Henriksboe on Wednesday set out the sentence he was seeking for the 40 charges against Hoiby, which included several counts of rape which investigators said happened when the alleged victims were sleeping or unconscious.
Hoiby pleaded guilty at the start of the trial to charges that carry lighter sentences, including offensive sexual behavior, driving too fast and driving without a valid license.”
Prosecutors in Norway have called for the son of Crown Princess Mette-Marit, Marius Borg Hoiby, to serve seven years and seven months in prison for offences including the alleged rape of four women. https://t.co/yBVKZsfl2Ypic.twitter.com/LOp6tBXnah
Trump Warns of Permanent Consequences for Every Lawmaker Who Votes Against the SAVE America Act
March 18, 2026
If the Democrat-opposed SAVE America Act crashes and burns, President Donald Trump says he knows who will feel the heat.
“The Save America Act is one of the most IMPORTANT & CONSEQUENTIAL pieces of legislation in the history of Congress, and America itself,” Trump posted on Truth Social.
Trump noted that the bill goes deeper than its provisions that would reform elections to require voter ID.
“NO MORE RIGGED ELECTIONS! Voter I.D., Proof of Citizenship, No Rigged Mail-In Voting (We are the only Country in the World that allows this!), No Men in Women’s Sports, No Transgender MUTILIZATION of our Children. 90% to 99% ISSUES ALL!” he wrote.
“Only sick, demented, or deranged people in the House or Senate could vote against THE SAVE AMERICA ACT. If they do, each one of these points, separately, will be used against the user in his/her political campaign for office – A guaranteed loss!” Trump wrote.
Trump closed with a message to voters.
“Get your Senators, REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT, to VOTE ‘YES’ ON ‘THE SAVE AMERICA ACT.’ I WILL NEVER (EVER!) ENDORSE ANYONE WHO VOTES AGAINST ‘SAVE AMERICA!!!’” he wrote.
As the Senate is poised to open debate on the bill, NBC News noted that the bill is popular across the board, with even 71 percent of Democrats supporting voter ID.
“It kind of feels like the only Americans not to support voter ID requirements are Democrats here in Congress,” GOP Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota said.
But Democrats are playing the race card to rally opposition.
“The SAVE Act is nothing more than Jim Crow 2.0. It could disenfranchise millions of American citizens,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said.
Thune said that likening it to Jim Crow “insults the overwhelming majority of Americans — including minorities — who look at voter ID and see nothing more than common sense.”
Even Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who has issues with some parts of the legislation, said the race-baiting is out of line.
“If they really want to have a real conversation, and if they align it that 83 percent of Americans support showing basic ID — you know, I’m not going to tell 83 percent of Americans that they’re crazy, or they’re trying to suppress votes, or they’re Jim Crow,” Fetterman said. “I’m not going to describe people like that.”
As noted by Fox News, Thune ripped into Democrats, accusing them of a double standard, as the Senate convened on Tuesday.
“I haven’t heard Democrats complaining about the thousand other circumstances in which we require photo ID in this country. Democrats are aware that Americans have to show photo ID to get on a plane, right? And to start a new job, and when they head to the doctor’s office and to rent a car and to stay in a hotel. Heck, if you want to get a library card, you have to show a photo ID,” Thune said.
“The Democrats remember their 2024 convention, when attendees had to show a photo ID to get in? The senior Democrat senator from Georgia required photo ID to get into his recent rally,” Thune said. “Do Democrats hear themselves? Are they going to start boycotting libraries and airplanes and hotels for requiring a photo ID?”
“Are they going to explain why they are perfectly justified in their requiring a photo ID for their political rallies, but why it is somehow an intolerable burden to ask people to show a photo ID when they go to vote?” he said. “I expect they won’t. They’ll simply continue their mindless, partisan opposition to common sense ID requirements for federal elections.”
The Pro-Abortion Scripture Twisting of Senate Candidate James Talarico
March 18, 2026
James Talarico/Screencap of Twitter/X video.
Guest Post by Pro-life Leader Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life
James Talarico, a Democrat Senate Candidate in Texas, is a false prophet. He should be ashamed of himself for trying to deceive Christian voters into thinking the Bible justifies abortion… and all kinds of other unbiblical practices.
This is not a new approach among supporters of America’s holocaust. They’ve been doing it from the beginning.
Well before Roe vs. Wade, the “Clergy Consultation Service” started. It was a group of clergy who counseled and referred people to doctors who were willing to perform abortions illegally, or to the few places where it was legal, using the clergy-penitent privilege of confidentiality to avoid prosecution.
By the time abortion was legalized, they had facilitated the killing of almost half a million babies. (Good work, men of God!)
To this day, the organization that fuels the kind of twisted arguments Talarico – who has been studying to become a minister – utilizes is the “Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice” (RCRC.org). They have Bible studies about why abortion is OK, liturgies to bless the practice, and more.
The hijacking of religion to justify baby-killing was actually the key strategy for those who started the abortion industry, and their ringleader who, in his own words, “uncaged the abortion monster in the United States,” Dr. Bernard Nathanson. I knew him personally, and as he told me and a group of clergy, “We would never have gotten away with what we did if you, the clergy, had been united, purposeful and strong.”
Dr. Nathanson wrote about this in his books after becoming pro-life, saying his team caught the Catholic Church asleep on the issue and stole it from them, misrepresenting Catholic teaching and sowing division between Church leaders and the people they teach.
This tactic continued, right up to the present, with prominent “Catholic” public officials who likewise misrepresent Catholic teaching. There’s a long history here, starting with John F. Kennedy’s declarations of absolute separation between the demands of religion and public office, continuing through NY Governor Mario Cuomo and candidate Geraldine Ferraro and their public disputes on abortion with Cardinal John O’Connor, and exemplified in our day with the declarations of Dick Durbin, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden about how everything is just fine as they fervently practice their Catholic faith and serenely join it with even more fervent promotion of abortion without limits paid for with taxpayer dollars.
Talarico is in pretty good (or bad) company. He’d also enjoy meeting Curtis Boyd, retired late-term abortionist who is a former Baptist minister and says he performed abortions not despite his faith, but because of it. The RCRC must be proud!
To get a taste of how disgusting all this is, consider Talarico’s take on the Annunciation (Luke 1:26-38). Gabriel announces to the virgin Mary that she will be the mother of Jesus. Talarico says that because God gave her a choice, it is therefore OK, according to God’s Word, for women today to have the choice to kill their babies in the womb.
Excuse me, but there’s a difference between the choice to bring a child into the world (a perfectly valid freedom) and the choice to throw a child out of the world through killing.
The Annunciation has nothing to do with baby-killing. In fact, the passage shows exactly the opposite. Whereas the prochoice mentality says it is my choice that matters, Mary responds to the angel saying the opposite. “Be it done unto me according to your word.” It is God’s choice that matters.
Both Peter and Paul warn that we must not use freedom as an excuse to do what is wrong (see 1 Peter 2:16 and Galatians 5:13).
And this whole debate, moreover, isn’t about particular words and passages in the Bible. It’s about the overarching themes from the beginning to end of the Bible: God’s dominion over human life, the blessings of fertility, the dignity of human life in God’s image, the curse of child sacrifice, the victory of life over death, and the meaning of love (which says “This is my body, given for you,” not “This is my body, I can kill you).
Yet this makes no impression on James Talarico. But hey, he’s in a political campaign, not just a seminary.
It sure is foolish to try to extract an interpretation of Scripture that somehow the community that wrote, handed on and lived the Bible somehow missed over the millennia that they have spent opposing abortion.
James Talarico should stop trying to hijack the Word of Life to support the culture of death.
If he’s in favor of baby killing, he should just say so and defend it on its own merits, rather than twisting a sacred book which apparently, he respects far less than the rest of us do.
Prolife Leader Frank Pavone (@frfrankpavone) is the National Director of Priests for Life, the President of the National Pro-life Religious Council, and the Pastoral Director of Rachel’s Vineyard and Silent No More. See www.ProLifeCentral.org.
ABLECHILD: Behavioral Health IT Dirty Pipeline Questions Not Asked at Mullin’s Confirmation Hearings, Bipartisan Greenlight
March 18, 2026
Behavioral Health IT Dirty Pipeline Questions Not Asked at Mullin’s Confirmation Hearings, Bipartisan Greenlight Republished with permission from AbleChild. Senator Markwayne Mullin is poised to receive bipartisan greenlights at his … Read more
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.