LIFE WINS: Scotland Lawmakers Reject ‘Assisted Dying’ Law

LIFE WINS: Scotland Lawmakers Reject ‘Assisted Dying’ Law

LIFE WINS: Scotland Lawmakers Reject ‘Assisted Dying’ Law
March 18, 2026

Citizens protest ‘assisted dying’ law in Britain.

Euthanasia and assisted suicide were defeated, a blow to the culture of death in the British Isles.

Under failing Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Britain has fully embraced Globalist policies that promote death, as you can read in After Late Term Abortions, British MPs Now Approve Assisted Suicide Bill – PM Starmer Votes for It – Campaigners Vow To Resist Legislation in the House of Lords.

But while the England and Wales’ ‘Assisted Dying’ legislation has been stuck in the House of Lords, a much harder pushback is taking place across the Irish Sea, in Scotland.

Yesterday (17), Scottish lawmakers voted against legalizing assisted dying, in a crushing defeat for the campaigners for the ‘culture of death’.

“After much thought and consideration, I have decided to vote ‘No’ on the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill.

Firstly, there is a real fear that vulnerable people, including women who have suffered domestic abuse, could be coerced into taking their own lives.

Secondly, many disabled people fear that their lives will be devalued and could be pushed to take their lives.

Thirdly, the scope of this bill could be widened to include more illnesses and younger ages, as has been the case in other countries.

Instead of creating a pathway for people to end their lives, we should be strengthening the palliative care services that help them live their final days with dignity, comfort and support.

Dr. Pam Gosal

Reuters reported:

“Fifty-seven lawmakers in Scotland, whose parliament has devolved powers in certain areas, backed the bill. But 69 ​voted against and there was one abstention for a law to allow terminally ill, ​mentally competent adults, who have lived in Scotland for at least 12 months, ⁠to end their lives, the Scottish parliament said on X.”

Globalists at Reuters frame the situation as the United Kingdom ‘being behind Australia, Canada and some U.S. states’.

The Telegraph reported:

“MSPs voted by 69 to 57 to throw out the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, with one abstention, after several who previously supported it switched sides.

They were given a free vote on the Bill, meaning they could act in line with their consciences and were not whipped by their parties.”

Opponents to this bill are concerned that ‘vulnerable people could be coerced into ending their own lives,’ something that we already see happening in Canada, as you can read in CULTURE OF DEATH: 5% of Canadian Deaths Are Now Caused by Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide, Killing More Than 13.500 People.

“Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of the Care Not Killing campaign against the legislation, said: ‘We are relieved that MSPs have decided not to back this legislation. We believe the Bill posed serious risks to the most vulnerable in society – including disabled people and those suffering from domestic abuse. It threatened the relationship between doctor and patient that is central to our NHS’.”

Read more:

British Assisted Suicide Bill Expected To Fail in the House of Lords Due to Lack of Time for Parliamentary Debate

The post LIFE WINS: Scotland Lawmakers Reject ‘Assisted Dying’ Law appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Paul Serran

Schumer Is Wrong, The SAVE America Act Does Not Disenfranchise Anyone

Schumer Is Wrong, The SAVE America Act Does Not Disenfranchise Anyone

Schumer Is Wrong, The SAVE America Act Does Not Disenfranchise Anyone
March 18, 2026

U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer delivers a speech at a podium on the steps of a government building, surrounded by colleagues.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said he would fight the SAVE Act “tooth and nail,” claiming it disenfranchises millions of voters. Photo courtesy of Senate Democrats, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is so strongly opposed to secure elections that he called the SAVE America Act bill “a naked attempt to rig our elections” and said Democrats were prepared to remain on the floor “all day, all night, as long as it takes.”

The SAVE America Act would require citizens to show both proof of citizenship and identification when voting. It would also severely restrict mail-in voting to the military and individuals who are medically unable to go to the polls. Everyone else would be required to show up in person, present documentation, and vote. The Act would not only prevent illegal aliens from voting but would also reduce voter fraud, much of which is tied to mail-in voting, and help reduce the casting of multiple votes by the same person.

It seems like common sense that, since voting is a right reserved for citizens, proof of citizenship should be a requirement. The 2020 election was one of the most contested in history, with much of the controversy associated with expanded mail-in voting, which allowed tens of millions of able-bodied people to send votes by post. These ballots could have been lost or otherwise manipulated, and the process effectively turned Election Day into election week, with final results coming days later.

The Commission on Federal Election Reform warned that voting by mail is “likely to increase the risks of fraud,” that “absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud,” and that “vote-buying schemes are far more difficult to detect when citizens vote by mail.” The MIT Election Data and Science Lab has also noted that even scholars who argue fraud is generally rare agree that fraud with mail-in voting appears more frequent than with in-person voting.

Democrats claim that the bill would disenfranchise poor people, Black people, other minorities, and women. This claim hinges largely on the belief that people in these groups do not have both identification and proof of citizenship. Research claims that around 21 million Americans do not have documents proving their citizenship readily available, and 2.6 million Americans lack government-issued photo ID of any kind.

However, these numbers need further analysis. It may be that 2.6 million lack a photo ID, but there is no indication that they also lack a birth certificate as proof of citizenship. Many of these individuals may only need to obtain one document in order to vote.

Thirty-six states already require voters to present identification to vote at the polls on Election Day. Twenty-four of those states require photo identification, while twelve accept non-photo identification. The remaining fourteen states do not generally require voters to present identification to vote. Therefore, unless the 2.6 million without ID are living in those 14 states with no ID requirements, they are not currently voting.

The claim regarding the 21 million figure comes from a 2023 survey of 2,386 U.S. citizens conducted by the polling firm SSRS, which reported a margin of error of ±2.6 percent. Extrapolating from 2,386 respondents to a national figure of 21 million, representing roughly 9 percent of the entire voting-age citizen population, is standard survey methodology. However, the margin of error of ±2.6 percent applies to the percentage finding, not the raw population extrapolation.

The actual uncertainty in the 21 million figure is therefore considerably larger than the ±2.6 percent suggests, and the conclusion could be off by millions. In layman’s terms, the fact that the sample size is much smaller than the population it represents is a significant weakness of the survey. As a result, the findings should not be treated as definitively accurate.

Additionally, the Democrats and the mainstream media have intentionally misrepresented the results. They left out this phrase, “readily available.” The survey asked respondents whether they had documents proving citizenship “readily available,” not whether they possessed them at all. The Brennan Center itself acknowledges the documents “might be in the home of another family member or in a safety deposit box.”

Claims that the SAVE America Act is racist are nonsense because people of all races would be required to show identification and proof of citizenship.

Claims that it is misogynistic or disenfranchises women are similarly false, as everyone must show the same documents.

Claims that Republicans want to rig elections by keeping poor people from voting are also wrong, because there are more Republicans than Democrats earning below the median income level.

And as for preventing married women from voting, Republican women are more likely to marry a man and change their name than are Democrat women.

So, in the end, the only people who will be barred from voting will be illegal aliens, fraudsters, and people who value the right to vote so little that they cannot be bothered to obtain proper identification.

The post Schumer Is Wrong, The SAVE America Act Does Not Disenfranchise Anyone appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Antonio Graceffo

Oregon School Principal Suspended for Bashing Charlie Kirk Sentenced to Over Five Years in Prison for Child Sex Abuse Images, Including One of an Infant

Oregon School Principal Suspended for Bashing Charlie Kirk Sentenced to Over Five Years in Prison for Child Sex Abuse Images, Including One of an Infant

Oregon School Principal Suspended for Bashing Charlie Kirk Sentenced to Over Five Years in Prison for Child Sex Abuse Images, Including One of an Infant
March 18, 2026

Portrait of a middle-aged man with a beard wearing a colorful floral shirt, set against a neutral background.

A principal in Oregon’s Rainier School District has been sentenced to more than five years in state prison after pleading guilty to possessing and sharing child sexual abuse material, just months after he was placed on paid administrative leave for trashing Charlie Kirk immediately following his assassination.

Jeremy Peter Williams, 50, of Longview, Washington, served as principal of Rainier Junior/Senior High School since 2022.

Williams was arrested on September 16 by the Cowlitz County Sheriff’s Office on charges of Dealing in Depictions of Minors Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct and Possession of Depictions of Minors Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct, just days after Kirk was killed, and the principal had already been placed on leave.

Rainier School District Superintendent Chad Holloway confirmed the leave in a letter to the community on September 17, according to a report from Oregon Live, writing, “Mr. Williams was placed on administrative leave regarding comments made surrounding the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk.”

The investigation began after the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children issued multiple referrals in August, flagging accounts linked to Williams on platforms including Discord and Kik that were trafficking child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

Detectives executed a search warrant at Williams’ Longview home, seizing phones, computers, and digital devices.

Authorities recovered at least 31 images of CSAM, including one depicting a sexual act involving an infant.

Prosecutors noted the images involved “vulnerable victims” but emphasized there was no evidence that any depicted students from Rainier schools.

“The investigation ultimately led to the discovery of at least 31 images of C-SAM [Child Sexual Assault Material] .. associated with Mr. Williams under the circumstances which would involve vulnerable victims, most egregious of which includes in particular an image with a sexual act on an infant child of concern,” the prosecution said, according to a report from KATU.

Williams pleaded guilty in January to three counts of possession of depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct as part of a plea deal that dropped the remaining original charges.

Cowlitz County Superior Court Judge Thad Scudder has now sentenced him to 61 months (just over five years) in prison, to be followed by 36 months of community custody. He must register as a sex offender for 15 years, pay $3,000 in court fees, and was ordered not to have contact with minors or access the internet except under strict conditions during his earlier release period.

In a pre-sentencing interview, Williams told investigators he began writing erotic short stories involving children to feel “popular and powerful” online, eventually leading to sharing explicit images.

Williams admitted to exchanging material that included a video of a 6-month-old infant and claimed he had won competitions for his writings.

The post Oregon School Principal Suspended for Bashing Charlie Kirk Sentenced to Over Five Years in Prison for Child Sex Abuse Images, Including One of an Infant appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cassandra MacDonald

FIREWORKS! Rand Paul and Markwayne Mullin Tear into Each Other After Paul Brings Up What Mullin Said After Kentucky Senator Was Assaulted By Neighbor (VIDEO)

FIREWORKS! Rand Paul and Markwayne Mullin Tear into Each Other After Paul Brings Up What Mullin Said After Kentucky Senator Was Assaulted By Neighbor (VIDEO)
March 18, 2026

Senators Rand Paul and Markwayne Mullin go after each other during Mullin’s confirmation hearing for DHS. Credit: C-SPAN screenshot

An ugly scene unfolded during Senator Markwayne Mullin’s (R-OK) DHS confirmation hearing today as Senator Rand Paul (RINO-KY) decided to settle a personal score with him.

Paul decided to take his time to address something that Mullins said about him after a long-ago assault. As TGP readers know, Paul was attacked by his neighbor in November 2017 over a property dispute.

He suffered six broken ribs and, later, a damaged lung.

Mullin, who was a congressman at the time, later said that he “completely” understood why Paul was attacked.

An angry Paul slammed Mullin as a coward and a liar. Then demanded that Mullin look him in the eye and tell the world he deserved to be assaulted.

WATCH:

PAUL: You told the media I was a freaking snake, and you understood why I was assaulted.

I was shocked you would justify and celebrate this violent assault that caused me and my family so much pain.

I just wonder if someone who applauds violence against political opponents is the right person to lead an agency is the right person to lead an agency.

You might argue you were mad and upset about being confronted by your constituents. Your constituents are justifiably upset with you.

By now, most of America knows that the Somali welfare fraud in Minnesota is still over $9 billion.

Instead of defending these votes, you chose to lash out at me.

You bragged that you already told me to my face that you completely understood and approved of the assault. Well, that’s a lie.

You have never had the courage to look me in the eye and tell me the assault was justified. Today, I will give you that chance.

Tell it to my face, if that’s what you believe. Tell the world why you believe I deserve to be assaulted from behind, have six ribs broken, and a damaged lung.

Tell me to my face why you think I deserved it.

Mullin declined to apologize and fired back with equal vigor. He also made clear that, regardless of his dislike for Paul, he would represent Kentucky as much as Oklahoma if confirmed as Director of Homeland Security.

He concluded by saying “I can set it aside if you’re willing to set it aside.”

MULLIN: Sir, I think everyone in this room knows I’m pretty blunt. If I have something to say, I’ll say it directly to your face.

You were in a room. I simply addressed that I could understand, because of your behavior, why your neighbor did what he did.

As far as the term “snake in the grass,” I work around this room to try to fix problems…Seems that you fight Republicans more than work with us.

As far as me saying I invoke violence? I don’t think anyone should be hit by surprise. But if I have something to say, I will say it straight to you.

And for you to say I’m a liar? That’s not accurate. And I got proof, you spent millions of dollars in my campaigns against me.

However, sir, that doesn’t keep me from doing my job.

I can have differences with anybody in this room, but as Secretary of Homeland Security, I’ll be protecting everybody, including Kentucky, as much as I will my own backyard in Oklahoma.

It’s bigger than the partisan bickering that we have. It’s bigger than the political differences we have.

The truth is, I have a job to do, and I don’t like to fail at anything at all.

I can set it aside if you’re willing to set it aside.

Paul, though, refused to do so.

PAUL: You offered no apology. And you offer no apology today, and no regrets. Haven’t heard the word apologize, haven’t heard the word regret.

Haven’t heard I misspoke, or it was heated, or a mistake.

MULLIN: Sir, actually, it wasn’t heated, and I’m not apologizing for pointing out your character.

PAUL: Good, good. So you’re jolly well fine, and you want the American public, and the people up here to vote, that may or may not vote for you, to know that you supported the felonious, violent attack on me from behind.

MULLIN: I did not say I supported it. I said I understood it. There’s a difference.

PAUL: So that means you really didn’t approve of it, you just said you understood it. What do you think most people would interpret, completely understand to be, support for, or a condemnation of the violence?

MULLIN: Sir, as I said, we can have our differences, it’s not gonna keep me from doing my job as Secretary of Homeland Security. I’m gonna secure Kentucky, and take care of Kentucky as much as I am Oklahoma.

The post FIREWORKS! Rand Paul and Markwayne Mullin Tear into Each Other After Paul Brings Up What Mullin Said After Kentucky Senator Was Assaulted By Neighbor (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cullen Linebarger

WATCH: Benny Johnson Posts Video from White House Showing Obama’s Official Portrait Has Been Banished into Hidden Staircase Corner Like Trash

WATCH: Benny Johnson Posts Video from White House Showing Obama’s Official Portrait Has Been Banished into Hidden Staircase Corner Like Trash

WATCH: Benny Johnson Posts Video from White House Showing Obama’s Official Portrait Has Been Banished into Hidden Staircase Corner Like Trash
March 18, 2026

Man in a suit gestures while showcasing elegant chandeliers in a grand staircase setting, highlighting ornate decor and historical paintings.

Benny Johnson has posted a video from the White House showing that Barack Obama’s official presidential portrait has been banished from its traditional place of honor in the prominent Grand Foyer near the entrance, where visitors on public tours would normally see it, to a high, out-of-the-way spot on the Grand Staircase leading to the president’s private residence.

That landing is strictly off-limits to the general public and is seen only by the First Family, the Secret Service, and a handful of staff.

In other words, Obama’s portrait is now basically in storage, like trash.

Johnson posted the hilarious video on X, captioning it, “Funniest thing what Trump has done with Barack Obama’s portrait, check this out.”

In the clip, Johnson pans the camera up to the now-hidden painting and zooms in to drive home just how far out of sight it is.

WATCH:

President Donald Trump didn’t just move Obama’s portrait; he replaced it in the prime spot with a powerful image of himself raising his fist in defiance right after the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania.

George W. Bush’s portrait was also bumped out of the main display area in the reshuffle.

The Obama portrait, painted by artist Robert McCurdy, had been in the high-visibility location under Biden.

This isn’t the first time Trump has used White House decor to send a message.

In September, President Trump unveiled a new “Presidential Walk of Fame” along the colonnade outside the West Wing. It features gold-framed portraits of every previous U.S. president, except one.

Instead of a portrait of Joe Biden, the spot contains a framed photo of an autopen (the mechanical signature machine presidents use for mass-signing documents) signing Biden’s name.

In December, Trump went further by adding custom bronze plaques beneath every portrait (including the autopen).

Biden’s plaque calls him “Sleepy Joe Biden,” labels him “by far, the worst President in American History,” accuses him of winning via “the most corrupt Election ever seen,” and lists a string of disasters during his term.

Obama’s plaque calls him “one of the most divisive political figures in American History” and criticizes his policies.

The post WATCH: Benny Johnson Posts Video from White House Showing Obama’s Official Portrait Has Been Banished into Hidden Staircase Corner Like Trash appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cassandra MacDonald