A pair of ICE agents walking through an airport has gone viral for their handling of a leftist activist’s whiny tantrum.

The activist, clearly agitated, repeatedly demanded answers about why they chose their jobs while claiming “the majority of Americans hate your guts” and accusing the agents of “terrorizing” people and wasting taxpayer money.

One agent, wearing a black “POLICE ICE” vest, remained composed and addressed the harasser’s tone directly.

“Why is your voice so stressed out?” the agent calmly asked.

The activist shot back, “Why won’t you answer the question?”

The agent replied, “I don’t have to.”

A second agent, in a tan tactical vest clearly marked “POLICE ICE,” stood beside his colleague without engaging the provocateur.

As the activist continued his rant, claiming taxpayers pay their salaries and calling the agents immoral, the officers simply kept walking, occasionally pointing out how nonsensical the questions were.

WATCH:

BREAKING: These patriot ICE agents are being praised for respectfully SLAPPING DOWN a leftist activist in the airport

“Why is your voice so stressed out?”

LIB: Why won’t you answer the question?

ICE: “I don’t have to.” pic.twitter.com/CuvHdARRJE

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 28, 2026

The activist followed the agents even as they moved through the terminal and outside, hurling more accusations about bonuses and “slaughtering innocent Americans” in reference to unrelated past events.

The agents never raised their voices, never touched the man, and never stopped doing their jobs.

On Friday, other ICE agents went viral for laughing at an activist who was harassing them at LaGuardia Airport.

“You guys are the foot soldiers of a fascist regime, right? Is that not what it is?” the man shouts at them, repeating the insult while the agents grin and eventually burst into laughter.

“Is that funny? Is that funny?” he presses as the agents continue walking and trying to hold back their giggles.

WATCH:

ICE agents laugh in the face of liberal at the airport screeching about fascism pic.twitter.com/XCHSmzbGut

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 27, 2026

The activist originally posted the video to Instagram, writing that he was “speaking truth to power,” and complaining that they laughed at him.

The post WATCH: ICE Agents Go Viral for Their Handling of Leftist Activist’s Airport Tantrum, ‘Why is Your Voice So Stressed Out?’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Vice President JD Vance recently revealed that the federal government is moving quickly on prosecuting fraud and that a “significant ramp-up in the number of prosecutions” is expected “in a matter of months” during an interview with investigative reporter Nick Shirley. 

Shirley previously uncovered billions of dollars in federal funds being stolen through Somali fraud schemes involving Minnesota daycare centers, bringing a spotlight on the mass abuse of welfare fraud in blue states across the country.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Trump named Vance the chairman of the White House’s new anti-fraud task force last week, along with Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson, who will serve as Vice Chairman.

WATCH: Trump Signs Executive Order Designating JD Vance Anti-Fraud Task Force Chair, Roasts Border Czar Kamala Harris – “This Will Not be Like a Kamala Where She Was Put in Charge of The Border”

President Trump announced during his State of the Union Speech last month that Vice President Vance would lead his administration’s “war on fraud.”

Vance told Shirley that under his leadership, the task force will coordinate with the Department of Justice and other agencies to bust fraud rings, unlike what has been done in the past. He further explained that the Department of Justice now has, for the first time, a "committed Anti-Fraud Task Force" and a "committed assistant attorney general who's focused on the fraud issue."

Collin McDonald, who was confirmed by the Senate this week to be the Assistant Attorney General (ASG) for fraud enforcement, will be sworn in next week, and "the plan is we got to start doing prosecutions as quickly as possible," said Vance.

"I think in a matter of months, we should be seeing a significant ramp-up in the number of prosecutions that we're seeing," he added.

WATCH:

Shirley: Now that we have the fraud task force here inside the United States, what are we going to be doing different than something that we haven't done before, to tackle fraud here?

Vance: Well, two really big things, Nick. So, first of all is we're going to be coordinating across the government in a way that's really never been done before to focus on anti-fraud. So, let's say, for example, that Scott Bessent or somebody at the Secretary of Treasury's office sees a fraudulent payment made, but it's not, you know, it's not at the Treasury Department, It's at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid. There's going to be coordination now so that when one person in the government sees fraud happening, they're actually telling everybody else, so that we can get to the root of it and hopefully prosecute it.

And that leads me to my second point, and maybe the most important is we've never before within the Department of Justice had a committed Anti-Fraud Task Force, a committed assistant attorney general who's focused on the fraud issue. What our new AAG focused on fraud has told me, that right now, we don't even prosecute fraud that's under $1.5 million, which means there's a lot of fraudsters who never get caught, who never get punished. We're changing that too.

Shirley: There's people who are making $1.5 million, committing fraud, and they used to not be prosecuted. When can we expect to see prosecutions take place, for instance, for example, like the leaders at the leering center?

Vance: So, we just got AAG, our new AG, confirmed. He hasn't even been sworn in yet. I'll swear him in next week, actually. And look, I think the plan is we got to start doing prosecutions as quickly as possible. These cases take a little while to build. You've got to investigate, you've got to gather evidence.

But now that we have that guy set up, now that we have Colin McDonald set up, I think in a matter of months, we should be seeing a significant ramp up in the number of prosecutions that we're seeing.

The post WATCH: JD Vance Tells Nick Shirley that Prosecutions for Fraud Schemes Are Imminent After He Takes Lead as Anti-Fraud Task Force Chair appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In January, the FBI executed a search warrant on the Fulton County Elections Hub and Operations Center and seized over 650 boxes of election materials from the 2020 election.  The warrant was approved by a federal magistrate judge and based primarily on evidence from two Georgia State Election Board complaints.  The Gateway Pundit has extensively covered those two complaints over the past four years.

Part 4: Nothing Adds Up in Fulton County… 17k Missing Ballot Images, 10 “Phantom” Tabulators That Account for 20k Votes, and More

The three petitioners, Fulton County, the Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections, and the Board of Commissioners, in their official capacities, have petitioned the court to claw back those documents from the FBI and Department of Justice, claiming they were seized unlawfully and that this seizure violated the First and Fourth Amendment rights of the petitioners.

Initially, the probable cause affidavit was challenged under Rule 41g, a motion to return property obtained through an unlawful search and seizure.  A federal judge ordered mediation between the two parties, which failed last week.  An evidentiary hearing was then ordered.

Yesterday, U.S. District Court Judge J.P. Boulee of the Northern District of Georgia heard from two witnesses offered by the petitioners:  Fulton County Clerk of the Superior Court Che Alexander and the Elections Group's Ryan Macias.

In order for Fulton County to retain the records from the Department of Justice, they are required to meet a four-part substantive test.  According to VoterGA's Garland Favorito on X, those questions are:

1.  Did the government display a "callous disregard"  for the plaintiff's constitutional rights?
2. Did the plaintiff have an individual interest in and need for the material?
3. Will the plaintiff be irreparably injured by denial of the return of the property?
4. Does the plaintiff have an adequate remedy at law for the redress of their grievance?

Pitts v. USA Evidentiary Hearing
Fulton Ballot Seizure Criminal Investigation
Why are We Here?
Its Friday morning and we are attending an unprecedented “evidentiary hearing” for a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal procedure in the Pitts v. USA case challenging the… pic.twitter.com/jv2mpBKXTn

— Garland Favorito (@VoterGa) March 27, 2026

Favorito and his wife Tamara, who are intimately involved in the election investigation and several cases in the State of Georgia, were in attendance for the hours-long hearing yesterday.

According to Favorito, they spent "all day" on question #1, "callous disregard", of the substantive test.  "There's no conceivable way that you could reach a conclusion that there was callous disregard for the plaintiff's right because the [office of the] Clerk has no constitutional rights, number one, and the DOJ adhered to the normal procedures for getting the search warrant," Favorito stated.

"Today, we spent five hours asking the question whether or not the FBI displayed a 'callous disregard'.  They had the affidavit which has five different areas, any one of which would have justified probable cause.  So if four of them were wrong, they would still have probable cause," he continued.

Question #2, "Did the plaintiff have an individual interest and need for the material", was argued that it fails because in June 2024, Elections Director Nadine Williams had previously requested to the court, in a case brought by Favorito, that the ballots be destroyed, thus negating any "interest of need for the material."

A video was played during the hearing where this request was made before a Georgia court.  So is the petition about retaining something with "an individual interest and need for the material" or is it about destroying evidence that could support the claims made in the probable cause affidavit?

Petitioners argued it was because they didn't have room for the election material, however, Favorito pointed out that the request was made three weeks after they purchased a $30 million, 660,000-square-foot warehouse for elections.

The argument regarding question #3, "Will the plaintiff be irreparably injured by denial of the return of the property?", is laughable.

"They actually tried to say that they would [be irreparably injured] for a reason that was just so unbelievable because they said well, now with all of this exposure, there's all these open records requests and we have to have the original records in order to fulfill those open records requests," Tamara Favorito said.  "I just wanted to stand up and scream, 'You've got to be kidding me!...Now they want to fill the open records requests!"

Ryan Macias, who worked for the non-governmental organizations The Elections Group at the time, also testified.  Favorito said that during the hearing, it came up that Macias was paid $400 per hour for 50-plus hours worth of work and was involved in the elections process in Fulton County.  "By default, being conflicted, that should have been enough to boot his testimony right out of there," Favorito stated.

In January, The Gateway Pundit reported that Joseph Rossi, who is party to an amicus brief submitted in this case, testified before the Georgia State Election Board last January that The Elections Group was party to an email in which Fulton County acknowledged that it was aware of a discrepancy in the audit-turned-hand-count in November 2020.

This discrepancy was eventually discovered by Rossi and confirmed by Governor Brian Kemp.  It became the subject of SEB Complaint 2021-181 and part of the probable cause affidavit in the warrant obtained by the FBI.

The Gateway Pundit will follow-up with a more detailed breakdown of the claims, and rebuttals, made in the Petitioners' brief.

Favorito joined the Why We Vote podcast on Badlands Media last evening to discuss the hearing.  For that specific segment, watch here or in the video below:

For the entirety of the Why We Vote podcast episode, including a demonstration on flipping votes, click here or watch below:

The post Fulton County Election Investigation Update: Evidentiary Hearing Yesterday on Motion to Claw Back FBI-Seized Evidence appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.