Bulgaria’s new government has moved to terminate an arrangement that allows American military aircraft to use Sofia Airport for refueling and logistical operations, linking the decision to the Trump administration’s continued refusal to grant visa-free travel to Bulgarian citizens.

Prime Minister Rumen Radev, elected weeks ago in a landslide election, announced Friday that permission for American aircraft and personnel to remain at Sofia’s Vasil Levski Airport would expire at the end of June, bringing an abrupt end to an agreement approved by the previous government earlier this year.

The decision marks one of the first major foreign-policy disputes between the newly elected Bulgarian government and the Trump administration.

Radev said he personally raised the issue of visa-free travel during a recent conversation with President Donald Trump but failed to secure a positive response.
“I called for the suspension of visas for Bulgarian citizens during my conversation with the American President, but I have not received a positive answer,” Radev said.

While acknowledging the complexity of immigration and regulatory procedures in the United States, the Bulgarian leader suggested that Sofia could not indefinitely continue accommodating American requests without progress on issues important to Bulgaria.

“We also have our priorities and we cannot respond positively to the request for long stays of aircraft and tankers at Sofia airport,” he added.

Under the extension approved by the Bulgarian government, the arrangement will remain in force only until June 30.

The temporary extension is intended to provide time for allied militaries to relocate aircraft and personnel to alternative facilities elsewhere in Europe.
“We’re extending the permission until the end of June so we can give time to our allies to reschedule and find another location,” Radev explained.

The agreement currently covers up to 15 American military aircraft, associated equipment, and as many as 500 personnel.

Aircraft operating from Sofia have included Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker refueling aircraft, Lockheed C-130 Hercules transport planes, and Boeing C-17 Globemaster III heavy-lift cargo aircraft.

Bulgarian officials, for their part, have emphasized repeatedly that the aircraft were not intended for any kind of combat missions.

Former caretaker Defense Minister Atanas Zapryanov previously stated that the deployments were primarily logistical in nature and designed to support allied activities.

Earlier this year, speculation emerged that American military assets in Bulgaria could be connected to growing tensions in the Middle East, particularly surrounding Iran. Bulgarian officials publicly rejected those claims.

“The exercise is in no way related to the situation with Iran or American negotiations,” Zapryanov said during a briefing in March.

According to Bulgarian authorities, the aircraft participated in joint military activities and logistical support missions rather than offensive operations.

The dispute nevertheless underscores how even close NATO allies can find themselves at odds over issues that extend far beyond defense cooperation.

For years now, Bulgarian governments have sought inclusion in the US Visa Waiver Program, arguing that Bulgarian citizens should enjoy the same travel privileges already granted to many other European Union member states.

The issue has become politically sensitive inside Bulgaria, where many voters view continued visa requirements as a sign that the country remains treated differently from its Western European partners.

Radev appears to have calculated that continued military cooperation should be accompanied by tangible benefits for Bulgarian citizens.
The move also reflects the broader political transformation taking place in Sofia.

Radev’s right-wing populist Progressive Bulgaria party won a decisive victory in April elections, ending years of political instability that produced multiple caretaker governments and repeated parliamentary elections.

The former president assumed the premiership in May, becoming the first Bulgarian politician in modern history to serve as both president and prime minister.His unusual political trajectory has attracted attention across Europe and within NATO.

Analysts have observed and noted that Radev has often taken a more cautious approach toward geopolitical disputes than many other leaders in Eastern Europe.

His positions regarding Russia have occasionally generated controversy among critics, who argue that Bulgaria should adopt a harder line toward Moscow.

Supporters, however, counter that Radev’s emphasis on national interests and pragmatic diplomacy resonates with voters exhausted by years of political paralysis.

The airport dispute is likely to intensify debate about Bulgaria’s role within NATO and its broader relationship with Washington.

Some analysts view the decision primarily as a negotiating tactic designed to pressure the United States on the visa issue.

Others see it as a signal that Sofia intends to pursue a more independent foreign-policy course under its new leadership.

The White House, for now at least, has not publicly responded to Radev’s announcement, and it remains unclear whether further negotiations will occur before the June deadline.

The post EU & NATO Member State Bulgaria Tells American Military to Leave After Trump Says No To Visa-Free Travel Deal appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Cringe woke Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wore a red patterned hijab while addressing an Eid al-Adha celebration at Macombs Dam Park in the Bronx on May 27, 2026, standing on stage alongside New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Mamdani, New York City’s first Muslim mayor, also wore a kurta styled like Arsenal soccer jersey and told the crowd, “I am honored to be New York City’s first Muslim Mayor and I am determined to lead through solidarity; together, we are working to ensure every New Yorker can afford the groceries, housing, and child care they need.”

Footage and captions from the event describe Ocasio-Cortez as speaking about “solidarity” with Muslim New Yorkers while she delivered brief remarks during the holiday gathering stating followers need to “renew our commitments to one another,” to “bring light into darkness.” In later comments reported by outlets covering the controversy, she defended her decision to wear the headscarf, calling it “the respectful move” toward constituents observing the festival.

Viral clips shared by outlets like show groups of men at the Eid celebration talking among themselves and appearing to ignore the hijab-clad congresswoman as she speaks from the stage. Some commentators highlighted the scene of a largely male audience speaking over her as evidence of a clash between the progressive lawmaker’s feminist branding and gender norms in Muslim doctrine.

On X and Instagram, conservative and anti-woke accounts amplified the video, with one widely shared post quoted in NerdStash reading, “What a fraud! Bought and paid for!” Ynet reported critics mocking Ocasio-Cortez for, in their words, “screaming about patriarchy while cosplaying in a garment mandated by brutal theocracies” as they circulated the clip.

Other viral posts roasted her appearance as “political cosplay” and accused her of “pandering in a hijab” at the event with Mamdani, with one caption declaring, “NY HAS FALLEN” above the footage.

Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!

Follow Drew on X: https://x.com/DrewHLive
Follow Drew on Rumble: https://rumble.com/DrewHernandez

The post CRINGE: AOC Panders to Muslims With Mamdani in New York? | Drew Hernandez appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In modern Britain, if you are attacked in the street while being white, you don’t face just one enemy. You face two: the thug trying to kill you… and your own government, which has already decided whose side it’s on.

Eighteen-year-old Henry Nowak never even got the chance to fight back.

The promising Polish-British accounting and finance student was walking home from a football night in Southampton on December 3, 2025. A Sikh man, Vickrum Digwa, 23, carrying a 21-centimeter “ceremonial” — how about that? — dagger legally protected by “religious exemption,” stabbed the teenager five times — in the chest, legs, and face.

Henry tried to flee, leaving a trail of blood as he begged for his life.

Then the police arrived.

And that’s when the second attack began.

Instead of treating the bleeding, dying boy as the victim, officers — fed years of “white privilege” brainwashing — immediately believed the stabber’s lie: that this white teenager had racially attacked him and knocked off his turban. Henry Nowak was slammed to the ground, handcuffed, and allegedly dragged across gravel while he repeatedly screamed: “I can’t breathe!” “I’m dying!”

According to multiple accounts from the pre-trial, officers reportedly laughed in his face. “I’ve been stabbed!” One allegedly replied, “I don’t think you have, mate.” They left him cuffed and bleeding for minutes before finally realizing he was telling the truth — as he lay dying in his own blood.

Henry Nowak didn’t die just because a violent degenerate plunged a blade into his soul.

He died because the British state had already chosen the side of the “protected minority” over one of its own native sons.

The myth of “White privilege” is a murderous cult

This is not an isolated tragedy. This is the logical, mechanical, and inevitable result of a decade of poison imported from America’s worst universities and European postmodern garbage — Foucault, Marcuse, and the entire “white privilege” death cult.

According to this deranged ideology, simply being white is itself a privilege that must be punished. When the government is confronted with a white victim and a non-white perpetrator, it must always side with the non-white to “correct” the so-called privilege.

The result? British police treat a dying white teenager like a criminal while protecting the man who just butchered him.

The family of the killer even hid the murder weapon. Yet the initial police response was to arrest the victim.

And now? The Hampshire Police are refusing to release the bodycam footage — even though it is perfectly legal for them to do so. They know what the public will see: the final moments of a bright, kind, football-loving young man being mocked and neglected not only by his murderer by the very people sworn to protect him.

The British people are not stupid. The rage is building. Those bodycam videos will surface, one way or another.

This abomination reveals two inescapable conclusions:

First: The toxic, false, murderous ideology of “white privilege” and all its derivatives must be completely eradicated from government, police forces, universities, and every public institution. It is not a theory — it is a death sentence for innocent white people. Perpetuating this theory by inciting action — that is, killing — is incitement to murder.

Second: Those who imported, promoted, and enforced these anti-white ideas must be held accountable. Ideas have consequences. When your ideology leads directly to the handcuffing of a dying teenager, you don’t get to hide behind academic “nuance.” The publicly funded university must stop inciting racial hatred. Those who spread this racist theory, this new Nazism, must be denounced and expelled. In these dark and dangerous times, one question burns: Where is the Senator McCarthy of our time? Where is the man with the courage to name and confront the enemy within our gates?

As Charles de Gaulle refused to commute the death sentence of the Nazi-collaborator Robert Brasillach after World War II, some crimes against the nation and its people cannot be forgiven. They must be confronted. Those who condone murder and incite racial hatred —yesterday against Jews, today against white people— are complicit in the murder. Brasillach hadn’t killed anyone. But he celebrated revolutionary National Socialism, and the massacre of Jews, and his writings were used by the Nazi occupiers. After the war, Brasillach pleaded: clemency! mercy! De Gaulle said: go to hell, pal.

Henry Nowak was everything Britain should celebrate: young, intelligent, hardworking, integrated, full of promise. Instead, he became another statistic in the slow-motion suicide of a once-great nation that now punishes its own children for the crime of existing while white.

Rest in peace, Henry.

Your death will not be in vain if it finally wakes up the British people — and Americans watching this nightmare unfold across the Atlantic.

Release the bodycam.

End the religious knife privileges.

End the two-tier policing.

And end the anti-white insanity before more innocent blood is spilled.

The post Is It Legal to Be White in the United Kingdom? The Tragic Fate of Henry Nowak – Brutally Stabbed by a “Protected Minority”… Then Handcuffed and Mocked by His Own Police appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

President Trump is in continued negotiations with Iran after last week’s Situation Room meeting failed to result in an agreement to end the war. 

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Trump held a meeting with advisors in the Situation Room on Friday, where he said he would “make a final determination” and potentially sign a deal with Iran.

Trump announced a “largely negotiated” framework for a 60-day “memorandum of understanding” (MOU) last weekend. Included in the plan is a 60-day ceasefire, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, concessions from Iran on nuclear enrichment, and an Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire.

Early reports on the deal suggested that it would require Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz for unrestricted passage and abandon its nuclear enrichment program.

Reporting suggested that Iran agreed to extend the ceasefire and continue negotiations on its nuclear program, and the MOU only needed Trump’s buy-in.

However, the President did not sign the deal as administration officials say negotiations are set to continue.

U.S. Military Launches Precision “Self-Defense Strikes” in Southern Iran – Neutralizing IRGC Threats to American Troops After Radical Regime’s Latest Provocations

Axios reported on Saturday that President Trump requested amendments to the deal during the Situation Room meeting, according to sources familiar with the talks. Two US officials say Trump wants to strengthen various points, including the nuclear issue.

Meanwhile, Iranian officials have denied that they ever approved a deal.

"In its current form, the memorandum of understanding includes a commitment from Iran not to pursue a nuclear weapon, but no specific concessions beyond that," the report notes.

"It states that there will be a 60-day window to negotiate on nuclear commitments from Iran and sanctions relief from the U.S., with the first issues on the docket being how to dispose of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile and limit further enrichment."

But, according to a senior administration official, Trump wants "more specifics about how the U.S. gets the material and the timing."

Trump also wants changes to the wording regarding the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

The back-and-forth discussions could take several days as Iran's leaders are "literally in caves and they're not using email," the senior administration official said.

The post UPDATE: Trump Seeks Amendments to Iran Deal After Situation Room Meeting appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

France’s biggest football triumph of the year once again—for the second year in a row–descended into a night of riots, looting, arson, and street violence, reinforcing growing concerns that public disorder has become a recurring feature of major national celebrations.

By dawn, following Paris Saint-Germain FC’s victory over Arsenal in the Champions League final in Budapest, Hungary, at least 416 people had been arrested across the country, including 283 in Paris. Meanwhile, Budapest remained calm.

Problems in Paris pic.twitter.com/KOU8r5UF4S

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 31, 2026

Seven police officers were injured, businesses were looted, vehicles were torched, and large sections of the capital resembled a security operation rather than a victory celebration.

Massive fire by the Eiffel Tower.

Paris is in flames… again… pic.twitter.com/N0hJFhYkly

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) May 31, 2026

The most remarkable aspect of the violence, for many French citizens, was not its scale but its predictability. Days before PSG even took the field, authorities—and business owners—were already preparing for riots,

The French state deployed more than 22,000 police officers and gendarmes nationwide, including 8,000 in Paris alone. Such numbers would normally be associated with a major security threat, not a soccer match.

People in Paris celebrating PSG winning Champions League

pic.twitter.com/pZ0iRcVBbT

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) May 31, 2026

Yet despite the massive deployment, violence still erupted across Paris and at least 15 other cities. Looters targeted businesses, fires were set in multiple locations, and police were forced into repeated confrontations with aggressive crowds.

The scenes followed a pattern that has become increasingly familiar. What begins as celebration quickly transforms into vandalism, attacks on public property, confrontations with law enforcement, and mass arrests.

Problems in Paris pic.twitter.com/KOU8r5UF4S

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 31, 2026

Marine Le Pen, the defacto leader of France’s most popular party National Rally, responded with a question many French citizens have been asking for years: why does a football victory so often end in urban chaos?

“Only in France does the victory of a football club provoke riots,” Le Pen said, lamenting a situation in which many residents feel compelled to avoid city centers during major public celebrations.

Jordan Bardella, another senior figure in the National Rally, was equally blunt. He condemned what he described as the same recurring cycle of destruction that follows one event after another.

“The modus operandi is always the same: stone, destroy, pillage,” Bardella said.

For critics of the Macron government, of which there’s an ever increasing amount of, the riots represent more than isolated criminal acts. They argue the disturbances expose a deeper crisis of authority, where the state increasingly struggles to impose order despite deploying enormous resources.

The numbers alone are striking. Hundreds arrested. Thousands of officers mobilized. Businesses damaged. Public infrastructure vandalized. Yet none of it came as a surprise.

That predictability is precisely what alarms many. When governments begin planning for riots as a routine consequence of sporting celebrations, something has gone fundamentally wrong.

The disturbances have reignited a broader national debate over mass migration, demographic shifts, public order, law enforcement, and the limits of existing policies. Many voters increasingly question why such scenes continue to repeat themselves year after year.

Business owners and local residents, unfortunately, usually bear the immediate costs. Shops are boarded up, public spaces are damaged, and ordinary citizens are left to navigate the aftermath.

For many French voters, the PSG riots are no longer simply about football. They are viewed as another example of a broader inability to maintain order in public spaces and protect communities from recurring waves of violence.

As courts process hundreds of arrests and investigators assess the damage, France once again faces uncomfortable questions. Not merely about what happened during one chaotic night, but about why these scenes have become so familiar that authorities now prepare for them as a matter of routine.

The post Paris Burns: PSG Champions League Victory Sparks Second Straight Year of Riots, Looting, and Arson appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.