As the fake news media and the Democratic Party try to claim that its far-left Democratic Socialist wing does not represent communism, a clip has resurfaced showing a top Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) leader openly admitting “Our goal is Communism”

As The Gateway Pundit reported, CNN’s Kaitlan Collins went on air on Friday and blasted Trump for saying that the Democratic Socialists are “the most serious threat to our country since its existence.” She described his comments as “border apocalyptic,” while insisting that the Democratic Socialists of America are not actually Communists.

“While Democrats themselves have been wrestling with what Tuesday night means for the direction of their party, socialism, much less democratic socialism, is not Communism,” Collins said.

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Already Rushing to Defend DSA Members, Insists Democratic Socialism is Not Communism

However, a clip has resurfaced, showing DSA National Leader David Jenkins debunking her claims by literally admitting that the goal of the DSA is "Communism."

A compilation of Jenkins's previous remarks shows him saying on a Zoom call, "Our goal is liberation. Our goal is Communism." It is unclear when the clip was recorded.

The video goes on to feature Jenkins's greatest hits, including calling to defund the police at a New York City budget hearing, admitting that he aligns with Marxism, admitting he was present at the January 6 protests as a "counterprotester," and spewing violent rhetoric.

But Kaitlan Collins, CNN, and the Democratic Party want you to believe these people are simply "democratic socialists," far from Communists.

WATCH:

The video, which is currently going viral for the part where Jenkins admits, "Our goal is Communism," was originally created and shared in April by citizen journalist Stu Smith.

You may have seen the recent New York Post piece on David Jenkins, the DSA mime leader who also holds national leadership. Since mimes are usually silent, it seemed worth letting people hear Jenkins in his own words.

Consider this supercut a helpful guide for anyone still wondering what “libertarian socialism” looks like in practice.

Though he brands himself a libertarian socialist, Jenkins frames the broader DSA project in explicit terms, “Our goal is liberation. Our goal is communism.”

He calls for disbanding the NYPD’s Strategic Response Group, aligns himself with a political tendency that includes anarchists and left communists, and says he was the “only DSA member” at a January 6 counter-protest in Washington.

Speaking about his campaign against the SRG, Jenkins escalates the rhetoric further, “We’re not going anywhere until your goons finally start killing us, because that’s where this shit is going.”

He also fumes that the NYPD protected those attending a rally in support of Daniel Penny, which he denounces as a “disgusting display” by “outside agitators from Long Island” celebrating a “self-deputized racist murderer.”

DSA National Leader David Jenkins Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: “Our Goal Is Communism”

You may have seen the recent New York Post piece on David Jenkins, the DSA mime leader who also holds national leadership. Since mimes are usually silent, it seemed worth letting people… pic.twitter.com/SxqyferacS

— Stu Smith (@thestustustudio) April 13, 2026

The post While Kaitlan Collins Claims Democratic Socialists Aren’t Communists, Clip Resurfaces of DSA National Leader Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud: “Our Goal is Communism” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Jessica Gorman, mother of Sheridan Gorman, the Loyola student who was murdered by one of Joe Biden’s illegal aliens, went off on Democrats during a House Judiciary hearing on Tuesday.

18-year-old Sheridan Gorman was murdered by one of Joe Biden’s illegal aliens in the sanctuary state of Democrat-run Illinois.

Earlier this year, the Loyola University student was shot and killed near campus in Chicago.

A masked gunman approached a group of students walking in Rogers Park and opened fire.

Gorman was shot in the head and died at the scene.

The DHS confirmed that the masked gunman who killed Gorman is a 25-year-old illegal alien from Venezuela who entered the US under the Biden Regime.

“The story is about my Sheridan. It’s about how failed border policies, sanctuary city laws, and twisted leaders refuse to cooperate with ICE,” Jess Gorman said.

“They sent her to her grave,” she said.

“It’s about a government and politicians that forgot their first priority. And the question before this committee is painfully simple: When did protecting our American citizens stop being your first priority?”

“And even more important, why did protecting our American citizens stop being your first priority? I want an explanation, I need one and I deserve one!” she said.

“Thanks for telling me without telling me that you know you’re here, but you don’t want to be,” she said. “Thanks for telling me you don’t care.”

“This cannot be buried under your slogans, your statistics or excuses, and this just can’t stand.”

WATCH:

The post Angel Mom Jess Gorman Unloads on Democrats After One of Biden’s Illegal Aliens Murders Her Daughter Sheridan Gorman (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is 55, included the TikTok slang phrase “understood the assignment” in her concurring opinion in the Supreme Court’s major birthright citizenship ruling issued Tuesday.

The Court ruled 6-3 in Trump v. Barbara to uphold traditional birthright citizenship and strike down President Donald Trump’s executive order denying automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to parents who are illegally present or here on temporary visas.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion.

Justice Jackson filed a concurring opinion that went further in defending the broad interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.

In her concurrence, Jackson wrote that those who championed the Fourteenth Amendment after the Civil War “understood the assignment.”

The bizarre informal phrase appears on page 33 of the full opinion.

Jackson wrote:

In the aftermath of the Civil War, those who championed the Fourteenth Amendment—both within and beyond Congress—understood the assignment. Their work product used “language that transcended race and region,” and thereby “changed and broadened the meaning of freedom for all Americans.” Instead of the limited salve the principal dissent makes it out to be, the Citizenship Clause reflects this universalist approach.”

The phrase is widely used on TikTok and social media, mostly by Gen Z, to mean someone has fully grasped and executed what was expected of them.

Conservatives flooded social media with disgust at the casual internet being used in a formal decision, a sign of a serious decline in the Court’s seriousness.

Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson used the tik tok slang phrase “understood the assignment” in her concurring opinion for the birthright citizenship case pic.twitter.com/c4tDYq0LMN

— Pericles (@PerryALPHA) June 30, 2026

Many also noted the excessive use of em dashes in the opinion, speculating that it may have been written, at least in part, by AI.

Trump has long argued that birthright citizenship was intended for the children of freed slaves following the Civil War, not as a reward for illegal entry or birth tourism.

The post Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Used Trashy TikTok Slang ‘Understood the Assignment’ in Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Opinion appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship in a 5-4 decision.

Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” Roberts wrote.

Roberts was joined by Amy Coney Barrett, Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson.

Conservative Supreme Court Justices Alito and Clarence Thomas fumed over the birthright citizenship ruling in blistering dissents.

“The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstitutional the President’s Order excluding from citizenship the children of foreign temporary visitors and illegal aliens,” Thomas wrote.

“Both the Civil Rights Act and the Citizenship Clause guaranteed citizenship to persons born and domiciled in the United States regardless of their race. Neither guaranteed citizenship to persons who were not domiciled in the United States,” Thomas said.

“Blacks were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans. They had no other homeland, owed no allegiance to any foreign power, and were subject to no other authority. They “fought and bled in the same battles,” “gained and gloried in the same victories,” and were “liable to be called upon to defend [America] in time of war” alongside every other citizen,” Justice Thomas added.

Justice Thomas rightfully said that the reconstruction amendments after the Civil War – specifically the 14th Amendment — were to ensure that the children of black slaves would be given citizenship.

“In doing so, the Court adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support,” Thomas added.

Justice Alito called the ruling a “serious mistake” in a sole, blistering dissent.

“This is one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court, and in my judgment, the Court has made a serious mistake,” Alito wrote.

“Careful analysis of the text of the Fourteenth Amendment and the process that led to its adoption, shows that it does not degrade the concept of United States citizenship in this way. Instead, the Fourteenth Amendment confers citizenship on only those children who, at birth, owe allegiance solely to this country,” he said.

“United States citizenship is precious. Anyone who has attended a ceremony where citizens are naturalized can see that message on the faces of those who take the citizenship oath. Before saddling the Nation with a medieval rule, we had better be certain the Constitution requires it,” Alito added.

President Trump responded to the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling and called on Congress to immediately act.

The post Thomas and Alito Fume Over Birthright Citizenship Ruling in Blistering Dissents appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Senator Rand Paul expressed his strong disappointment Tuesday after the Supreme Court ruled to uphold birthright citizenship and strike down President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at ending automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to parents who are illegal aliens or temporarily in the country.

Instead of sitting on his hands, the Kentucky senator said that he has already filed an amendment to fully end birthright citizenship for those in the country illegally.

In a post on X, Paul stated, “The Supreme Court’s decision on birthright citizenship is disappointing. That’s why I’ve already filed an amendment to end birthright citizenship for those here illegally. I’ll keep fighting to protect the integrity of American citizenship.”

The Supreme Court’s decision on birthright citizenship is disappointing. That’s why I’ve already filed an amendment to end birthright citizenship for those here illegally. I’ll keep fighting to protect the integrity of American citizenship. https://t.co/XwfqjAVW9d pic.twitter.com/oNDlvisntr

— Senator Rand Paul (@SenRandPaul) June 30, 2026

The ruling addressed Executive Order 14160, which President Trump signed on his first day back in office.

The order directed that beginning 30 days later, children born in the United States to mothers who were either unlawfully present or lawfully present on a temporary basis, and to fathers who were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents at the time of the child’s birth, would not be recognized as U.S. citizens and would not receive federal documentation such as passports or Social Security numbers.

The executive order never took effect because lower courts had blocked it with nationwide injunctions, and the Supreme Court’s decision invalidated it entirely.

Chief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, which was joined in the core holding by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred in the judgment but dissented in part on statutory grounds.

Justices Clarence Thomas, who was joined by Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, and Gorsuch in separate writings, dissented.

The Court held that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and are therefore citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.

Senator Paul has been a longtime advocate for reforming birthright citizenship policies that reward illegal immigration and create anchor babies.

Paul previously cosponsored the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011 alongside Senator David Vitter.

In late April, Paul announced that he was introducing a constitutional amendment to clarify the meaning of the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in the Fourteenth Amendment.

The proposed amendment would limit automatic citizenship at birth to cases where at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or national, a lawful permanent resident residing in the United States, or an alien with lawful immigration status who is performing active service in the U.S. Armed Forces.

Paul stated at the time, “Under current interpretations of American law, anyone born on American soil automatically becomes a U.S. citizen, regardless of whether the parent was here legally or not. This is wrong and not at all the intent of those who wrote the 14th Amendment. We are a country filled with immigrants, and legal immigration is valuable and should be protected.”

The senator noted that he was offering the amendment in case the Supreme Court failed to address the issue correctly, a prediction that proved accurate with Tuesday’s ruling.

The debate over birthright citizenship centers on the text of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War.

Paul argues that the clause was primarily intended to secure citizenship for freed slaves and to overturn the Dred Scott decision, and that the “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” language was understood at the time to exclude children of foreign diplomats, invading armies, and others who did not owe full and complete allegiance to the United States.

The post Sen. Rand Paul Slams Supreme Court’s Ruling Upholding Birthright Citizenship, Introduces Constitutional Amendment to End It for Children of Illegal Aliens appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.