REPORT: Trump Administration to Target Soros Foundation, Far-Left Non-Profits

REPORT: Trump Administration to Target Soros Foundation, Far-Left Non-Profits

REPORT: Trump Administration to Target Soros Foundation, Far-Left Non-Profits
August 28, 2026

George Sorors: Image: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license/ Author Michael Wuertenberg

The Trump administration is preparing a sweeping tax-enforcement campaign that could threaten the privileged nonprofit status of some of the most powerful organizations in America’s left-globalist advocacy network, including George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Treasury officials, according to a report from the New York Post, are drawing up plans to audit organizations suspected of abusing the federal tax code. The reviews could ultimately lead to fines, back taxes and, in the most serious cases, the loss of coveted 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status.

The initiative marks a direct challenge to a nonprofit infrastructure conservatives have spent years accusing of operating as a tax-sheltered political machine. The central question, for the Trump administration, is increasingly simple — why should organizations engaged in aggressive ideological activism receive special treatment from the American taxpayer?

The effort relies in part on President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order targeting nonprofits operating with what the order describes as a “substantial illegal purpose.” The measure gave federal authorities another avenue to scrutinize organizations allegedly connected to unlawful activity, political violence or conduct outside legitimate charitable work.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s inner circle is now developing the enforcement blueprint. People familiar with the process say officials are considering everything from corrective penalties to complete revocation of nonprofit status.

One source cited in The New York Post article described Treasury officials as being “like a dog with a bone” and said some organizations and their donors could be “on borrowed time.” Another said frustration has been growing over the speed of enforcement inside the IRS.

“There’s a lot of internal pressure to get it done, but some people are still moving too slowly at the IRS,” the source said. “That is expected to change very soon.”

For those who aren’t aware, the Open Society Foundation is the multibillion-dollar network created by George Soros and now chaired by his son Alexander. Over decades, the organization has poured money into progressive NGOs, mass immigration activism, diversity programs, climate litigation and other causes that frequently intersect with the political agenda of the American and European left.

Open Society funding has reached organizations involved in Black Lives Matter activism, Palestinian advocacy, and campaigns opposing deportation of illegal immigrants, according to the reporting. Critics have long argued that such funding gives wealthy far-left ideological networks enormous influence over American public policy without requiring them to win a single election.

The financial consequences could be considerable if Treasury determines that organizations have violated tax rules. A Post analysis estimated that Open Society, the SPLC and 17 CAIR chapters together would have faced roughly $165 million in federal corporate income taxes for 2024 if their reported income had been taxed at the ordinary 21 percent corporate rate.

Nearly all of that hypothetical bill would fall on the Soros network — about $163.6 million. The SPLC’s estimated exposure was around $354,000, while the CAIR chapters together would have faced approximately $860,000.

The emerging review extends beyond the three headline organizations. Treasury officials have also examined groups including the Private Equity Stakeholder Project, the anti-Amazon Athena Coalition, MediaJustice and the Strategic Organizing Center, along with its parent union, the SEIU.

The scope suggests that the administration is looking beyond individual organizations toward what conservatives describe as a broader left-wing NGO ecosystem — a network of advocacy groups, foundations, activist organizations and unions that can shape public policy while enjoying tax advantages unavailable to ordinary political organizations.

Bessent has already acknowledged that the administration is compiling organizations for review. He has enlisted Tony Saffier, a former special-operations veteran and technology executive, to help lead the interagency effort examining nonprofit compliance.

The Bessent-Soros history gives the story an unusual twist. Before entering Trump’s orbit, Bessent served as chief investment officer at Soros Fund Management, and Soros later reportedly provided $2 billion in backing when Bessent launched his own investment firm.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, for its part, presents a different set of questions. According to reporting, federal prosecutors have brought criminal charges involving allegations of wire fraud, false statements and money laundering, while a former director of the organization’s Intelligence Project has also been charged.

Prosecutors allege donor money was secretly routed to informants inside extremist organizations, including an individual connected to an online leadership group surrounding the violent 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville. The SPLC denies wrongdoing and says its informant program was intended to infiltrate extremist networks, protect employees, and provide information to law enforcement.

CAIR is being treated differently still, with administration officials reportedly examining it through a national-security lens. The group was named an unindicted co-conspirator by federal prosecutors in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing prosecution, though CAIR strongly denies ties to Hamas, terrorist organizations or illicit foreign financing.

The legal counteroffensive has already begun. Protect Democracy has sued Treasury and the IRS, alleging that the administration may be trying to weaponize federal tax enforcement against political opponents and demanding records concerning the initiative.

Tax-law experts have also warned that the precedent could eventually be turned against conservative organizations under a future Democratic administration. University of Maryland professor Samuel Handwerger said organizations across the political spectrum should pay attention to how much executive power is ultimately established.

“Every administration inherits the precedents of the last one,” Handwerger said. “Organizations across the political spectrum have an interest in the answer, and many of them have not yet noticed that.”

Handwerger said actual revocation may not even be the most immediate danger. “If I were assessing real-world exposure for these organizations, I would rank it: bank de-risking first, donor and grant maker chill second, examination costs third, and actual revocation a distant fourth.”

That may be precisely why the administration’s campaign could have consequences well before the IRS reaches a final decision. Federal scrutiny alone can cause banks, corporations, foundations and major donors to reconsider whether they want their names or money tied to organizations undergoing tax or national-security investigations.

The broader issue, for Trump’s base, is not whether Americans should be allowed to fund progressive causes but whether the federal tax code should subsidize an ideological infrastructure that has spent years advancing open-borders activism, DEI politics, anti-deportation campaigns, and globalist policy priorities often rejected by voters.

The administration’s position amounts to a challenge to one of the left’s most durable centers of institutional power. Elections may change presidents and congressional majorities, but large foundations and nonprofit networks can continue financing activists, litigation, media campaigns and political pressure regardless of who occupies the White House.

Trump’s Treasury is now signaling that nonprofit status will no longer be treated as an untouchable shield. If an organization operates as a political machine, violates federal law or strays beyond the boundaries required of a tax-exempt charity, administration officials appear determined to make it prove why American taxpayers should continue subsidizing it.

The post REPORT: Trump Administration to Target Soros Foundation, Far-Left Non-Profits appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Robert Semonsen

How Endless Injunctions Are Manufacturing Election Chaos

How Endless Injunctions Are Manufacturing Election Chaos

How Endless Injunctions Are Manufacturing Election Chaos
August 28, 2026

How Endless Injunctions Are Manufacturing Election Chaos

The communist left doesn’t want free and fair elections – this is why they fight every common-sense move by the White House to clean up our broken elections.

Here’s what you need to know about the lawfare against the USPS actions put in place to address mail-in ballot concerns in the election process.

The first of two X posts from Unite4Freedom addresses – Exposing the Playbook: How Endless Injunctions Are Manufacturing Election Chaos

SCOTUS dragged its feet on an emergency motion, finally clearing the way on August 24 (Trump v. California) by staying an injunction against EO 14399 on technical standing grounds and ‘ripeness’. Everyone thought the fight was over – now the next battle has unfolded.

While the Supreme Court focused on docket No. 26A124, a separate, standing injunction was sitting in League of Women Voters v. Trump. Here is what actually went down after August 24:

· Aug 24 (Emergency Motion to Reconsider): The federal government rushed to District Judge Indira Talwani, using SCOTUS’s brand-new ruling to vacate the second injunction.

· Aug 25/26 (Injunction Lifted): Judge Talwani agreed with SCOTUS’s logic, vacating the August 11 preliminary injunction because challenging the order before official rules were published was deemed “premature”.

· Aug 26 (The Rule Drops): With the court barriers down, the USPS immediately published its Final Rule in the Federal Register. In response, the League of Women Voters and state AGs instantly filed supplemental complaints and NEW emergency motions for a TRO against the finalized rule.

· Sept 3 (The Next Showdown): Judge Talwani scheduled a hearing for September 3, 2026, to rule on these new TRO motions against the USPS.

SCOTUS didn’t end the fight – it triggered a lightning-fast procedural reset. The administration published the rule, and the plaintiffs filed new emergency filings targeting the finalized regulation.

While the plaintiffs argue that the timing and magnitude of these executive requests will adversely affect election administration, the plaintiffs themselves are directly contributing to the timing issues, confusion, and chaos.

By continually dragging these measures through endless litigation, they keep the entire country in a perpetual state of limbo – leaving voters, election workers, and government agencies trapped in a web of uncertainty over whether rules will stand or if another TRO will drop.

The judicial process was designed for checks and balances, not perpetual obstruction that turns the rule of law into a chaotic mess.

Unite4Freedom has consistently used existing state and federal laws as the bedrock for their arguments and efforts to achieve valid, transparent, and auditable elections.

While the administration is stepping up to implement common-sense measures necessary to bolster election security and verify voter integrity, certain individuals, political parties, and special interest organizations appear to have an extreme aversion to any meaningful improvement in election administration, security, or validity

…we have to ask ourselves why.

The second post outlines what the Job of a Federal District Judge: What Judicial Review Actually Means:

A U.S. District Judge is a trial-level Article III judge whose authority over an Executive Order is strictly bound by the Constitution and procedural law. Federal trial judges are not policy referees; they cannot review or enjoin executive actions simply because of political disagreement.

For a federal court to intervene in any case – civil or criminal – specific constitutional guardrails apply:

Standing is Mandatory: A plaintiff must demonstrate concrete, imminent harm caused directly by the government action. Speculative fears or hypothetical future harms do not create Article III jurisdiction.

No Advisory Opinions: Federal judges do not rule on hypothetical scenarios or issue guidance on unfinalized administrative proposals.

Strict Legal Frameworks: Review of an Executive Order requires checking for statutory authority granted by Congress, constitutional compliance, or arbitrary enforcement under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

Restricted Remedial Scope: Appellate jurisprudence increasingly restricts single trial judges from issuing sweeping nationwide injunctions, requiring relief to be strictly tailored to the specific injuries of the named parties before the court.

Appellate Hierarchy: A district judge’s ruling is a preliminary step in the federal judiciary, subject to immediate review and oversight by the U.S. Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court’s August 24, 2026 decision in Trump v. California directly reinforces these core jurisdictional boundaries:

Clear Jurisdictional Direction: The Supreme Court stayed the District Court’s injunction precisely because the trial court improperly bypassed threshold Article III requirements. The High Court affirmed that internal executive directives, preliminary rulemaking instructions, and non-binding lists do not inflict concrete harm on state governments.

Rejection of Speculative Standing: By holding that states cannot manufacture standing out of hypothetical enforcement scenarios or self-inflicted administrative costs, the Supreme Court signaled that lower court challenges to Executive Order 14399 lack merit on threshold jurisdictional grounds.

When activist organizations continue to file repetitive lawsuits or temporary restraining order (TRO) requests in lower courts, and trial judges entertain those filings despite established Supreme Court precedent on standing and harm, the resulting legal friction directly creates state-level administrative confusion.

The procedural maneuvers run counter to the Supreme Court’s explicit direction regarding the limited jurisdiction of federal district courts over internal executive policy and legally framed executive orders.

This truth…

THE truth about what is taking place in the US and in US Elections as Activist groups and activist politicians and judges wage war against the current administrations and any efforts to employ policy change for the betterment of the US citizens is being buried under a mountain of disinformation – hoping to leave you confused or frustrated enough to stop caring.

Become a volunteer and Follow Unite4Freedom as we fight for Valid, Transparent and Auditable elections AND as we fight on the side of TRUTH in the information war!

God bless America.

The post How Endless Injunctions Are Manufacturing Election Chaos appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Joe Hoft

American Medinas: Turning US Cities Into ‘Beachheads’ for Islam

American Medinas: Turning US Cities Into ‘Beachheads’ for Islam

American Medinas: Turning US Cities Into ‘Beachheads’ for Islam
August 28, 2026

Alexander Hamilton/National Gallery of Art/John Trumbull, Wikimedia Commons

This story was originally published by Real Clear Wire.

By Paul Sperry

Founded by Alexander Hamilton as the first industrial city in America, Paterson, N.J.,  is now home to America’s largest Palestinian community and largest proportion of Muslim residents. Today, New Jersey’s third-largest city is effectively run by its 30,000 Muslims, some of whom say they don’t need to learn English because it’s like living “back home” in an Arab city.

Paterson holds an annual Palestinian flag-raising ceremony, during which residents chant, “Free Free Palestine!” And in 2022, it renamed a five-block stretch of Main Street “Palestine Way.”

In June 2023, Paterson Mayor Andre Sayegh signed a sister city agreement with the mayor of Ramallah, a city in the West Bank and the seat of power of the Palestinian Authority, which officially celebrates the killing of Israelis. And last year during a ceremony kicking off Ramadan, he declared his city the “capital of Palestine in the United States of America” and the “fourth-holiest city” in Islam. “We are 100% halal!” Sayegh gushed, meaning pure and lawful under Islam. The mayor even agreed to hang a sign at the city entrance that reads: “Welcome to Little Palestine.”

Paterson is just one of several American cities – which also includes Hamtramck and Dearborn in Michigan – now controlled by Muslims; followers of Islam also exert outsized influence in some larger cities such as Minneapolis and New York.

To varying degrees, the actions of Muslims in these communities echo those of immigrant groups who came before them – creating thriving communities that can feel more foreign than American, supporting one another to gain office and influence, renaming streets after their own heroes, giving recognition to their own holidays. But critics warn that communities such as Paterson also reflect the different challenges posed by Islam, which is now the nation’s fastest-growing religion.

As is also the case in Western Europe, assimilation is demonstrably rare in U.S. municipalities with heavy concentrations of Muslim migrants. In these areas, large influxes of Muslims from abroad have changed not only the complexion, culture, values and traditions of cities, but also the demographic makeup of city councils, school boards, police departments and courts. Muslim officials, in turn, have changed laws or how existing laws are enforced to conform to the tenets of Islam – an unwelcome trend for many non-Muslims and particularly Jews threatened by their militantly anti-Israel rhetoric and positions.

“Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community, it is not to assimilate,” asserted Linda Sarsour, a renowned Palestinian activist who lives in the Paterson area and has helped transform the city.

RCI’s reporting on this phenomenon has found that Muslims often break with U.S. norms on a wide range of fundamental issues – from the separation of church and state and attitudes toward people of different faiths to what constitutes women’s rights and terrorism. As Muslims remake communities in their own images, they are dramatically changing the ever-evolving idea of what it means to be an American.

Not Alexander Hamilton’s Paterson

This is perhaps no more evident than in Paterson, where elected American officials annually raise the Palestinian flag. Several years ago, Paterson’s Muslim-majority city council voted to change existing noise regulations to allow the city’s dozen mosques to blast out the Islamic call to prayer five times a day – from before dawn to after dusk. The move has incensed some non-Muslim neighbors, including one who recently entered a nearby mosque to complain about the noise. “Everybody’s not Muslim here,” the man yelled. “I don’t want to hear that s— every day.”

Paterson’s largest mosque – the Islamic Center of Passaic County – is run by a radical cleric whose brother-in-law was a senior Hamas commander in the West Bank, where he orchestrated a number of suicide bombings against Israelis. Before immigrating to the U.S. from Jordan, this leading Paterson imam, Mohammad Qatanani, served time in an Israeli prison for his own confessed ties to Hamas. Yet he was presented the keys to the city by Paterson’s mayor in 2024.

Until last year, U.S. immigration authorities had sought to deport Qatanani because he hid his criminal record on applications for a green card. But last year, judges appointed by President Obama and President Biden ruled he could stay in the United States. They did so despite testimony showing that he’d called  for a “new intifada,” or violent Palestinian uprising, against Israel in a Times Square rally in 2017.  Hundreds of Israelis were killed during the first and second intifadas, and Qatanani has supported the families of intifada suicide bombers. A decade earlier, he gave a sermon condemning Christians to hell, telling Paterson’s Muslim faithful that “the followers of Jesus” as Lord will burn in the “pits of hellfire.”

The 62-year-old Qatanani, who has also admitted ties to the terror-tied Muslim Brotherhood, oversees satellite mosques in neighboring Clifton and Prospect Park, N.J., as well. His mentor and predecessor at the Islamic Center was its founder Mohammad El-Mezain. Qatanani worked alongside El-Mezain until El-Mezain was convicted of funneling millions of dollars to Hamas in 2008.

Qatanani denies supporting or advocating violence. He declined further comment.

Intensely political, the Palestinian community in Paterson shows up in force at council meetings, voter drives, and election events. Much of the political organizing centers around mosques, where the Israeli-Gazan war is debated and where politicians are groomed – or shunned. After Hamas terrorists slaughtered more than 1,200 Israeli Jews on Oct. 7, 2023, New Jersey’s U.S. representatives, senators and the state’s governor all declared their support for Israel. In response, Paterson leaders effectively banned the officials from mosques and public spaces in the Palestinian stronghold, according to published reports.

The state’s new Democratic governor, Mikie Sherrill, recently tried to thaw relations by visiting the Islamic Center and snapping a selfie with controversial imam Qatanani. She even covered her head with a hijab, in what critics said was an overt act of pandering to her Islamic hosts.

Paterson Muslims have turned out the vote to elect several brethren as councilmen, including Democrat Alaa Abdelaziz, who last year went on to become New Jersey’s first Palestinian-American state assemblyman. More than 40 Muslims now hold elected office in the state.

Even the Paterson police department has been Islamized – and politicized. More than 30 Muslims are now on the force, and some have sewn the Palestinian flag on their uniforms. Former Paterson Police Chief Ibrahim Baycora was sworn in on the Quran.

Another local hotbed for political activism is the Palestinian American Community Center, a well-funded anti-Israel operation with close to $2 million in assets, according to tax records. A mainstay of the greater Paterson community, the center helps organize the city’s “Palestine Day on Palestine Way” festival and lobbies for U.S. divestment from Israel, which it claims is carrying out “genocide” against the Palestinian people.

The center website claims that “U.S. support for Israel [is] rooted in perceived colonial bonds and white supremacy … Zionism [is] part of a larger Western imperial project.”

The Palestinian center has invited radical Islamists to speak at events as “honored guests,” including Sarsour, an ethnic-Palestinian who has been blacklisted by the Anti-Defamation League. Sarsour says she is anti-Zionist, not antisemitic. It’s a distinction made by many of Israel’s critics, but one that has been increasingly blurred by pro-Palestinian activists. The Paterson center’s publication, the Falastin Magazine, included in its March 2024 issue a poem arguing for Palestine to be free “from the river to the sea,” echoing a Hamas battle cry for wiping Israel off the map.

Two months after Hamas massacred 1,200 Israeli Jews on Oct. 7, 2023, the center’s president, Diab Mustafa, who grew up on the West Bank, told the New York Times that violent anti-Israel college protests across America “give [him] hope.” His office issues a form for student activists to work alongside Students for Justice in Palestine, a radical pro-Hamas and anti-Israel advocacy group which organizes student protests on college campuses.

While critics warn Paterson functions as an outpost for Hamas, the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ New Jersey chapter counters they’re “conflating Muslim civic participation and Muslim contributions in society with terrorism.” And it warns such criticism could put the Muslim community of Paterson, and specifically its mosques, “in the crosshairs.”

Surrounding New Jersey Towns

As Paterson’s mayor proclaims the city belongs to Islam, the religion’s dominance has spread beyond its borders. In nearby Clifton, N.J., Islamic leaders are proposing to build a new 40,000-square-foot mosque in place of a converted church where Muslims have been congregating. Muslims in Prospect Park, N.J., helped elect Syrian-born Mohamed Khairullah as their mayor. He leads three other Muslim men on the six-member city council.

Prospect’s school board is also packed with Muslim members. Its ethnic-Jordanian vice president, Arwa Bassam Entour, boasts they are “making a change” from the secular ways of the old board, including mandating Islamic holidays and halal school lunches approved by Islamic guidelines banning pork and other foods.

Thanks to chain migration, the area has become a magnet for migrants from Islamic nations. So many Muslims are settling in the Paterson area that apartment buildings have waiting lists. Critics warn more surrounding towns will fall to Islamic influence until, one day, Islam spreads across the entire tri-state region. This seems to be the plan. During a Jordanian flag-raising ceremony in Paterson this April, a county commissioner vowed: “Inshallah (Allah willing), one day we will be able to raise these flags throughout all 16 municipalities in Passaic County.”

At the same April ceremony, Palestinian American Community Center’s Mustafa walked up to the podium and compared the Islamification of Paterson – and one day America as a whole – to the Muslim prophet Muhammad’s mass migration to, and subsequent Islamification of the Arabian city of Medina, which was an important milestone in Islam known as the “hijrah.” Though Muslims made up only 15% of the population in Medina, they nonetheless were able to turn it into an independent Islamic state, going from refugees to conquerors in a relatively short period.

Likewise, according to the late Islamic scholar Patrick Sookhdeo, modern-day Muslims are encouraged to establish their own institutions in Western lands, rather than adapting to those of their hosts, and to transform the demographic and political landscape of cities entirely, as their revered prophet did in Medina. Islamic leaders like Mustafa often refer to U.S. cities with large Muslim populations such as Paterson as “American Medina,” for becoming central hubs of Islamic identity and control.

Located just 15 miles west of Manhattan, Paterson is part of a metropolitan area that includes New York City, where Zohran Mamdani, a Muslim, is now mayor. The Muslim population grew at an astonishing rate in the metro area, rising from 1.6% in 2000 to 5% of the total population in 2020, according to the Association of Religion Data Archives. The nearly 1 million Muslims now rival the estimated 1.3 million Jews residing in the metro area.

The Center for Security Policy maintains that an “electoral jihad” has already begun in the region. The Washington-based think tank notes that “radical” Muslim Adam Hamawy is now the prohibitive favorite to win the New Jersey seat in Congress representing the state’s heavily Democratic 12th Congressional District in November. Hamawy owes his success in large part both to the heavy Muslim turnout there in the recent Democratic primary and a flood of money from a new pro-Palestinian super PAC, American Priorities, which threw $1.6 million behind his candidacy. As RCI has reported, the PAC draws key funding from wealthy Muslims.

A former U.S. Army medical doctor, Hamawy won his June primary despite evidence that he once cozied up to notorious Al-Qaeda terrorist Omar Abdel-Rahman, better known as the “Blind Sheikh,” who masterminded the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. A vocal critic of Israel, Hamawy visited the al-Qaeda terrorist’s home and studied at his feet. He also acted as his translator and chauffeur at pro-jihad conferences, where the sheikh talked about “conquering the land of the infidels.” Hamawy testified as a defense witness for Abdel-Rahman at his trial.

His campaign says he now condemns the late sheikh’s terrorist activities and anti-American rhetoric.

Yet many family members of Americans murdered on 9/11 are upset that such candidates are taking over Democratic Party races and could gain access to U.S. military and counterterror intelligence as members of Homeland Security and other sensitive committees in Congress.

“This guy Hamawy is going to try and forget all about [his earlier association with a known al-Qaeda terrorist],” said Don Arias, a former New York firefighter whose brother worked in the South Tower on 9/11 and died in the al-Qaeda plane attacks on the World Trade Center.  “I’m not going to forget, and I don’t think people should forget.”

New York City

America’s most famous elected Muslim official, Zohran Mamdani, rode into office through strong support from New York’s largely immigrant Muslim community.

“The election of Mamdani is a game changer,” Yasir Qadhi, chairman of the influential Fiqh Council of North America, said in a sermon last year. “That is a victory for the Ummah.”

He also rejoiced in knowing that growing percentages of Muslims in Western cities are “terrifying” non-Muslim leaders. Noting such comments, Robert Spencer, a senior fellow with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, said that with Mamdani’s victory, “Muslim leaders are speaking openly now about the conquest and Islamization of the United States.”

Like members of rising immigrant groups before him, it is not surprising that Mamdani has appointed co-religionists to his team. What’s different, critics say, is that they tend to have connections to controversial policies and groups, including those tied to terrorism. An RCI analysis finds that Islamic activists now hold at least 10 high-ranking positions at Gotham’s city hall – starting with Ramzi Kassem. As the mayor’s top legal adviser, Kassem is in a position to influence the city’s anti-terror policies. It was Kassem who spearheaded the 2013 civil-rights lawsuit that three years later ended the NYPD’s surveillance of mosques and imams believed to be radicalizing young men to carry out violent jihad.

These days, Kassem won’t get as much pushback as he did last decade from the NYPD, which now boasts more than 3,500 active Muslim police officers– which is about 10% of the force, a figure in line with their citywide population. More than 40 Muslims are in NYPD leadership positions.

One of them is Pakistani-born Waheed Akhter, who was recently promoted from captain to the elite rank of deputy inspector of the NYPD. Akhter also acts as president of the NYPD Muslim Officers Society, whose website says it is “dedicated to building trust and improving relations between the Muslim community and the NYPD.”

Thanks to lobbying by this first-of-its-kind Muslim officers union, which also organizes annual pilgrimages to Mecca, NYPD now allows female officers to wear hijabs and male officers to wear turbans and kufi caps, as well as beards; Jewish officers are now allowed to wear yarmulkes. This year, NYPD hosted a Ramadan dinner at its headquarters.

Before joining the mayor’s office, the ethnic-Syrian Kassem was a pro bono attorney who defended al-Qaeda terrorists held at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay. More recently, he represented Mahmoud Khalil, the Syrian-born ringleader of the antisemitic protest encampment at Columbia University who was detained by ICE and slated for deportation.

Instrumental in raising money from fellow Muslims and getting out their vote for Mamdani,  the Hamas-tied Council on American-Islamic Relations now has some of its alumni represented in senior posts inside City Hall. One of them is Faiza Ali, who Mamdani appointed commissioner of his office for immigrant affairs, where she will distribute an additional $32 million a year in funds for housing, childcare and healthcare, as well as legal services – “in a major way,” she says – to immigrants facing deportation.

New York is already a sanctuary city, but Ali has vowed to strengthen protections for illegal immigrants.

“We are in a new era,” declared Ali, who was previously employed by CAIR’s New York office. She has already set up a confidential hotline in Arabic and Urdu for illegal immigrants to call for legal help. In addition, she is partnering with the Muslim Community Network and Arab American Family Support Center to hold “immigrant rights workshops” to help them “navigate interactions with ICE.”

Other Muslim activists serving in Mamdani’s cabinet include: Waleed Shahid, deputy communications director of economic justice; Mir Bashar, chief administrative officer; Ahmed Tijani, buildings commissioner; Zara Rahim, senior adviser; Nadia Shihata, commissioner of investigations; Sherif Soliman, budget director; former CAIR lawyer Bitta Mostofi, special adviser for strategic coordination and operations; Aliya Latif, executive director of the mayor’s office of faith-based partnerships; and Ali Najmi, who chairs the mayor’s advisory committee on the judiciary and will help pick city judges to ensure an “equitable legal system.”

These officials, in turn, are recruiting other Muslims to fill staff positions, ensuring an Islamic agenda will be prioritized over Mamdani’s four-year term in office. (NYC mayors are limited to two terms.)

“We are developing a cadre of political leadership in New York City,” Sarsour, the Islamic activist widely seen as one of Mamdani’s mentors, said in a recent interview. Before his election, she declared, “Our friends on the inside need people on the outside to hold them accountable. Voting for Zohran is not, ‘We’re going to vote for Zohran and just let him do whatever the hell he wants when he gets to City Hall.’”

Along with Sarsour, Ali and Latif, Najmi previously founded the Muslim Democratic Club of New York, an influential incubator for Muslim political candidates that blamed Israeli “oppression” for Hamas’ Oct. 7 slaughter of Jews.

In 2021, the Muslim political club helped elect Shahana Hanif as the first Muslim woman on the New York City Council, where she caucuses with fellow Muslim council member Yusef Salaam. The pair has vowed to work closely with Mamdani to advance the interests of the Muslim community.

The Muslim club is now endorsing a slate of other Democratic candidates for state and federal offices ahead of the November elections, including 9/11 apologist, former CAIR operative and Palestinian activist Aber Kawas. The daughter of illegal aliens (her father was deported after criminal convictions), she is now the Democratic nominee for the New York State Senate District 12 and could become the legislature’s first Muslim woman. Also personally backed by Mamdani, Kawas has suggested the U.S. deserved to be attacked on 9/11 for “colonizing” Muslim lands.

When Muslim members of Mamdani’s administration joined him in observing Ramadan earlier this year, it signaled the start of an Islamic cultural revolution in the city, home to more than half a million Muslims who feel empowered by the ascension of one of their own. For the first time in New York’s history, more than 1,000 Muslim men took over Times Square, bowing prostrate on the ground in a mass pray-in, on the first night of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month.

While this can be seen as an example of pluralism and religious freedom, critics note that Mamdani broke his Ramadan fast with Mahmoud Khalil, whom he hosted for an Islamic dinner inside Gracie Mansion in March – even though the anti-Israel protester had attempted to justify the Oct. 7 massacre of Jews by Hamas. The mayor’s own wife, a Muslim of Syrian origin, has “liked” a variety of social media posts celebrating Oct. 7.

Mamdani is not shy about rubbing shoulders with radical Islamists. Last year, he posted a photo of himself smiling and embracing Brooklyn Imam Siraj Wahhaj, who was investigated in connection with the 1993 World Trade Center bombing case and appeared on a federal list of unindicted co-conspirators of the Blind Sheikh and Osama bin Laden.

A year before the deadly attack, Wahhaj told his flock: “If only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.” He also said in a 1992 sermon: “If we go to war, brothers and sisters – and one day we will, believe me – that’s why you’re commanded [to fight in jihad]. When Allah demands us to fight, we’re not stopping and nobody’s stopping us.”

According to a transcript of the Brooklyn sermon obtained by the authors of “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America,” Wahhaj added: “I will never tell people, ‘Don’t be violent.’ That’s not the Islamic way.” To that end, he suggested recruiting New York street gangs and brandishing “9 millimeters and Uzis” for jihad. “These people have guts and courage that a lot of Muslims don’t have,” Wahhaj argued. “Some of these people are ready to stand in front of anyone and fight.”

The Islamic cleric has also preached that the Quran says Muslims should never take non-Muslims for friends and that homosexuals should be punished by death. Yet Mamdani recently called Wahhaj “one of the nation’s foremost Muslim leaders and a pillar of the community.”

The mayor’s office did not respond to requests for comment. Wahhaj, meanwhile, denies any connection to terrorism.

Hamtramck, Michigan

Situated in the middle of the Detroit metro area, Hamtramck is another microcosm of Muslims coming to power and gradually imposing their strict religious code on the greater community.

Muslim immigrants from mostly Yemen and Bangladesh have flocked to the two-square-mile city and carved out an increasingly Sharia-compliant enclave. Their numbers have made it a Muslim-majority city, and that’s translated into unprecedented political power. With almost 30,000 residents, Hamtramck is the first city in the U.S. to have an all-Muslim elected city council. Also sharing the Islamic faith are its mayor, city manager, attorney, comptroller, clerk and police chief. Like Paterson, one of the first acts by its Islamic leaders was to rename the city’s main street “Palestine Avenue.”

Like the Chinatowns and Little Italies that dot American cities, Hamtramck now reflects the sensibilities of its new majority. Storefronts display signs in Arabic, from hookah bars to halal butchers. Female shoppers dress head-to-toe in black niqabs covering everything but their eyes, and bearded men wear ankle-length white robes typically seen on the Arabian Peninsula. Arabic is spoken in public spaces. Many local businesses fly Yemeni and other Middle Eastern flags outside their shops and paint murals of the “struggles” in the Palestinian territories. Even the official sign outside the meeting hall of the city council is in Arabic.

And mosques are omnipresent. With more than a dozen so-called “masjids” and Islamic centers, 125-year-old Hamtramck now has more mosques per capita than anywhere else in the United States. Several were converted from church buildings.

Muslim leaders have gone further, changing laws to accommodate their religion. Once they gained majority power, Muslims on the city council overturned rules restricting outdoor noise to let mosques broadcast the Arabic call to prayer from minarets. Five times every day, the sounds of the “adhan” can be heard echoing from loudspeakers throughout the city. In a kind of reverse assimilation, non-Muslim residents in recent years stopped complaining about the incessant calls to prayer, according to the city’s largest mosque, Al-Islah Islamic Center, even though they trigger additional noise: the baying and barking of dogs owned by non-Muslims. What once was viewed as a nuisance has been normalized.

In addition, Muslim officials banned traditional bars near mosques, even though Hamtramck was once known for its pubs and music. Islam forbids alcohol, so only hookah bars are allowed around places of worship. Hookah lounges are where Muslim men gather to smoke flavored tobacco from water-filled pipes that look like large, ornate bongs. Ads and signs for alcohol have dwindled along with the number of taverns.

At Hamtramck schools, Easter break has been replaced with vacation at the end of Ramadan. Lunch menus are 100% halal: “The animals have been blessed by a Muslim” before being slaughtered for school meat, according to a school document certifying the practice. In 2023, the city council voted to permit the slaughtering of goats and sheep on residential property as long as it conforms to the Islamic ritual of slitting the live animal’s throat with a knife and draining the blood before further cutting and processing.

Importing Corruption 

Islamic governments, particularly those of Yemen and Bangladesh, are notoriously corrupt, according to global risk indexes (here and here); and this foreign culture of corruption appears to have been imported into Hamtramck, which has been plagued by a series of corruption scandals involving its immigrant Muslim officials.

It’s not uncommon in the American immigrant experience for new cultures to erase the old in heavily migrant communities. Self-dealing and election shenanigans among ethnic groups that come to power in municipal politics often follow as well. Hamtramck is keeping this dubious tradition alive – and then some.

Five of its six Muslim council members have been charged with, or are currently under investigation for, election fraud. These include allegations they conspired to forge the signatures of recently naturalized Muslim immigrants on absentee ballots or buy their votes, according to a state law enforcement document. Last month, a jury convicted councilman Mohammed Hassan, who also serves as Hamtramck’s mayor pro tem, on charges he provided a false statement for an application on an absentee ballot in the 2023 election. Earlier this month, Hassan was sentenced to one year of probation and community service by a county judge who expressed astonishment at the extent of corruption in the city. Despite the conviction, Hassan remains on the city council. Another councilman was charged with several election fraud felonies, but charges were dropped after two witnesses failed to appear to testify against him. Other council members reportedly remain under investigation by a special prosecutor named by the state attorney general, who has been working with the FBI.

The voting fraud scandal bubbled to the surface last year when former city manager Max Barbarino blew the whistle on mail-in ballot malfeasance he witnessed, as well as alleged criminal misconduct involving the city’s Muslim police chief, who was recently forced to resign. After Barbarino initiated a preliminary investigation into the misconduct, the Muslim mayor and council fired Barbarino and replaced him with a fellow Muslim. In turn, Barbarino, who is white and non-Muslim, sued the council, claiming racial discrimination. He complains the “racially biased” Muslim council also pressured him to fire blacks and gays in city hall.

“These past few years have been horrible,” said Barbarino, a former police chief. “Dealing with this corrupt council, always doing what I could to hold the line and protect the city. Frankly, they have put my staff and I through hell.”

In his whistleblower lawsuit, Barbarino said at least one councilman was caught on video stuffing “large batches of absentee ballots” in drop boxes as part of a “ballot-harvesting” scheme in 2023. He also alleges that former Hamtramck Police Chief Jamiel Altaheri leaked sensitive information from the election fraud investigation to council members who were targets of the investigation. He claimed the chief routinely provided “updates” on evidence gathered on the suspects.

In addition, the suit describes a “disturbing pattern of domestic violence from Altaheri.” On two occasions in 2024, Altaheri was said to “hit and punch” the mother of his child. He allegedly ordered responding officers not to write up incident reports, arguing, “You guys here in Michigan don’t handle things the correct way; you guys make everything formal,” suggesting such cases should be handled through mosques following the tenets of Sharia law, which does not proscribe wife-beating as a crime. Altaheri, who did not respond to requests for comment, is also accused in the suit of punching a man “in the head at a hookah lounge in Dearborn [Mich.].”

Altaheri, who is of Yemeni descent, previously served as a New York police officer where he co-founded the NYPD Muslim Officers Society and the Yemeni American Law Enforcement Officers Association. He also headed the NYPD’s Office of Equity and Inclusion, where he led efforts to hire more Muslims on the force.

Barbarino said he got pushback from Yemenis on the council when he suspended Altaheri, pending an investigation by the FBI into his conduct. (Altaheri has resigned but maintains his innocence.) At a May 2025 council meeting, the then-city manager had refused demands to keep the top cop on the job.

Dearborn, Michigan

Just 15 miles from Hamtramck is another city with a dense concentration of Muslims. Almost half the Dearborn police force is now Muslim. Abdullah Hammoud, Dearborn’s Democratic mayor, has called for the annihilation of Israel “from the river to the sea” and said Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack was “inevitable,” adding, “Ending this violence requires ending the occupation.”

Critics worry these Sharia-compliant enclaves are providing a theocratic blueprint for surrounding towns, and they warn the entire Detroit area, like that around Paterson, could come under Islamic control given current demographic trends. In 2020, the share of the Muslim population more than tripled in the Detroit metro area, rising to 5% of the total population from 1.4% in 2000, according to the latest data from the Association of Religion Data Archives.

Dearborn’s influence already has spread to its western neighbor, Dearborn Heights, where its police department introduced an Arabic version of its uniform patch, in the shape of a badge, worn by officers. In Southfield, Mich., another inner-ring suburb of Detroit, a Sharia-compliant bank has sprung up that caters exclusively to Muslims. It’s called the University Islamic Financial Corp., and it provides alternative loans for homes, autos, and businesses that conform to Islamic principles that prohibit the charging or earning of interest. UIF Corp. offers no other products, yet it is now the top Islamic finance institution in the country thanks in large part to demand from the surfeit of Muslims in the Detroit area. UIF has sold more than $1 billion in Islamic mortgages in Michigan and more than 15 other states. As RCI has previously reported, following pressure campaigns by Muslim lobby groups, American financial giants, including Morgan Stanley, AIG, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Merrill Lynch, Citicorp, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan Chase, now offer Sharia-compliant products that strictly adhere to such Islamic criteria.

Cultural changes are one thing. But the influx of Muslim immigrants has triggered a surge in jihadist terrorism in the Dearborn area, including recent plots tied to ISIS, according to Homeland Security data. The terror suspects frequented mosques, some of which preach jihad. According to the 2020 U.S. Mosque Survey, the number of mosques in the state almost doubled from the previous decade to 127. Last year, Ammar Abdulmajid-Mohamed Said allegedly used a drone to surveil an Army base in Warren, Mich., where he planned to use armor-piercing ammo and Molotov cocktails to kill soldiers on behalf of ISIS before his arrest, according to an FBI affidavit. The 19-year-old Muslim said he was “fed up with this country [and] I want to go for jihad.”

Surveys show a sizable share of Michiganders are not happy with the spread of Islam in their state and have soured on Muslim immigration.

Almost two in five (37%) agree there are now “too many” Muslim immigrants in the state, according to a poll taken in May of 1,456 state voters by TechnoMetrica. By a six-to-one margin, more voters say Michigan accepts “too many” Islamic immigrants versus those who say the state accepts “too few.” Even Democrats who voted for Kamala Harris in 2024 tend to agree, with nearly double saying there are “too many” Muslim immigrants in the state compared with those who say there are “too few.”

Islamic leaders say these attitudes reflect pervasive anti-Muslim prejudice that colors their efforts to participate in American life. Even so, Muslim political candidates in the state are gaining traction thanks to the growing number of Muslim voters. And some are highly controversial.

Abdul El-Sayed, for one, is a strong Democratic Senate candidate in Michigan despite calling Israel “just as evil” as the terrorist organization Hamas, and suggesting Washington needs to do a better job of understanding the motivations of terrorists, including a Muslim Arab-American who earlier this year attacked a Michigan synagogue.

“Hurt people hurt people,” El-Sayed said. He claims Israel is committing “genocide” against Gazans, citing debunked death toll figures put out by the Hamas-controlled government there. He bashes the “sins” of America and its “sordid history.” In March, he privately told staffers the previous day’s slaying of Iranian ayatollah Ali Khamenei created problems for campaign messaging, because, “There are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad today.”

Born in Detroit to Egyptian immigrant parents, El-Sayed also has advocated for abolishing ICE, turning Michigan into a sanctuary state, and defunding the police. The Democratic Senate candidate is so orthodox in his Islamic beliefs that he even took out a mortgage from University Islamic Financial to be “Sharia-compliant.” And according to his financial disclosure statement, he and his wife have invested as much as $425,000 in Amana Mutual Funds, an investment firm established by DOJ-identified Muslim Brotherhood front groups whose Sharia-compliant portfolio screens out U.S. defense contractors and companies doing business with Israel. Equally devout, his wife covers her head and neck in a full hijab. At the University of Michigan, where he became a Rhodes Scholar, El-Sayed was vice president of the Muslim Students’ Association, which was founded by the radical Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood.

In 2011, El-Sayed penned columns supporting a Muslim Brotherhood revolution in Egypt, and pledging solidarity with “my 80 million Egyptian brothers.” The next year, he signed a petition exalting the “revolutionary decisions” of Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohamed Morsi, who brought Egypt under Sharia rule as president from 2012 to 2013.

Former FBI agent Lara Burns testified recently that MSA was founded by Muslim Brotherhood leaders as a “covert front organization stealthily designed to seed an Islamist narrative and radicalize others [on American campuses].” MSA members recite the following pledge: “Allah is my Lord, Islam is my life, the Quran is my guide, the Sunna is my practice, Jihad is my spirit, Paradise is my goal, I will die to establish Islam.”

El-Sayed’s campaign is funded primarily through a super PAC – Fighting for Michigan PAC – which has ties to his family. Its top donor is his Michigan Muslim father-in-law, Jukaku Tayeb, who FEC records show gave $300,000 to the PAC in three installments this year, along with a $14,000 direct contribution to El-Sayed from him and his wife. Tayeb is a longtime board member of two Muslim Brotherhood front groups identified by federal prosecutors as unindicted co-conspirators in a scheme to funnel more than $12 million to Hamas – the Islamic Society of North America and CAIR, according to ISNA records. El-Sayed is a regular speaker at CAIR events, according to his financial disclosure report. He and his father-in-law did not respond to requests for comment.

Vying to become the United States Senate’s first Muslim, El-Sayed won the Aug. 4 Democratic primary and will square off against GOP candidate Rep. Mike Rogers in November for what is expected to be a must-win seat in the battle for control of the Senate.

Testifying at a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing the day after the Michigan primary, Center for Security Policy analyst Kyle Shideler warned the Democratic nominee’s win is also a victory for the Egypt-based Brotherhood, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization, which celebrated his election on its official website.

“It shows the success of the Muslim Brotherhood network over multiple decades,” he testified. “It achieved what they said they were going to achieve, which was to normalize support for Hamas and normalize support for terrorism.”

Minnesota

Thanks to the profusion of Muslim immigrants primarily from Somalia, Islam is flourishing in Minneapolis, and the faithful are mainstreaming Sharia practices across the city. Like parts of Detroit, the Minneapolis area has struggled to integrate waves of Muslim migrants. Numbering roughly 80,000, Somalis now make up close to 20% of Minneapolis’ total population. The state’s largest city is now known as “Little Mogadishu,” after the capital of Somalia.

In Minneapolis’ Cedar-Riverside ward, where bazaars displaying Arabic signage and halal eateries have replaced once-popular bars and clubs, Islamic men have organized posses to patrol the streets and enforce Sharia law, including prohibiting alcohol and the mixing of sexes, and ordering women to wear head-to-toe religious garb, according to local reports. At the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, the mostly Muslim taxi and Uber drivers are known to turn away non-Muslim passengers carrying alcohol or escorted by dogs (which are prohibited as pets in Islam). Muslim cashiers at Target and other stores selling groceries have even balked at scanning bacon, pepperoni pizza, and other pork-based products.

In the previous decade, Minneapolis became a terrorist hotspot, as dozens of young Somali men joined al-Qaeda and ISIS, according to the FBI. Recently, another scandal has unfolded from mass Muslim immigration: massive welfare fraud, which has been linked by federal investigators to the funding of terrorist groups in Somalia. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been stolen from state and federal welfare and childcare programs – and from taxpayers – almost exclusively by Somali immigrants running sham charities and no-show social service agencies, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. DOJ, which is leading the ever-widening investigation, estimates that as much as $9 billion may have been paid out on fraudulent claims. More than 85 Muslim defendants have been charged so far in the Somali fraud ring. Federal authorities believe much of the government money has ended up in the hands of al-Shabaab, al-Qaeda’s offshoot in Somalia.

Evidence suggests that some high-ranking Muslim politicians in Minnesota helped facilitate the Somali crime racket.

Rewind to 2020. That’s when the Minnesota Department of Education suspected one of the shady Somali nonprofits – Feeding Our Future – was defrauding the state by filing false claims for reimbursement for meals allegedly served at child-care centers. Initially, the department suspended processing of the organization’s site applications. But then Keith Ellison, the state’s first Muslim attorney general, stepped in. Instead of prosecuting the fraudsters, he agreed to continue processing the applications.

Two years later, FBI investigators set up surveillance cameras outside a dozen Feeding Our Future sites that were supposedly feeding thousands of children each day. They observed that the kids were nowhere to be found. Agents then raided the sites, leading to the arrests of some of the same Somali scammers Ellison had protected.

Ellison was brought before Congress to answer questions about his failure to back state regulators against Feeding Our Future and other Somali fraud fronts. He denied any wrongdoing, including allegations he obstructed fraud investigations in exchange for campaign contributions.

But a December 2021 audio recording surfaced of him meeting with some members of the Somali community who were later convicted of fraud, including one of the Feeding Our Future ringleaders: Ikram Mohamed. The would-be fraudsters could be heard demanding that Ellison, whom they called “Brother,” fend off regulators and investigators and free up frozen payments on their claims, while pledging “votes” and  dollars” to keep him in office so he would feel “comfortable and safe” enough to protect their interests.

“The only way we can protect what we have is by inserting ourselves into the political arena, putting our votes where it [sic] needs to be, but most importantly, putting our dollars in the right place, and supporting candidates that will fight to protect our interests,” Abshir Omar, a Feeding Our Future consultant and site operator, said on the tape.

“That’s right,” Ellison responded, according to a transcript.

“But if you are secure in your donor base, and if you are secure in your power base, you can act the way you want to act,” Omar added.

“Money is freedom,” Ellison said, chuckling.

“We are jumping into the fight with some serious money, serious organizing, and we need you in this fight with us,” Omar asserted. “We are gonna commit to backing you.”

“I’m here to help,” the attorney general replied. “Let’s fight these people … put a stop to it.”

Ellison vowed to convey their complaints to the Minnesota Department of Education. “I’ll call them in my office and demand some explanations,” he said.

A House Oversight Committee investigation concluded that, “Attorney General Ellison knew about fraud in the Child Care Assistance Program as early as spring 2019.”

Nine days after the recorded 2021 meeting, state records show Ellison received $10,000 in donations from some of the convicted fraudsters for his 2022 reelection, though he later quietly returned the gifts – four years later, after their roles in the fraud scheme were revealed, according to Minnesota Campaign Finance Board filings. In early 2022, Ellison got an additional $2,500 from another conspirator in the fraud, records show, but that gift also was returned a year later.

Whistleblowers from the state agencies reported to congressional investigators that “they were told not to say anything about the fraud because they would be called ‘Islamophobic,’” according to the House report.

Critics say Ellison is a cautionary tale about the potential problems with electing Muslims who could be in a position to prosecute fellow Muslims for alleged crimes. The massive fraud case, which could have been stopped earlier, has resulted in a black eye for the Land of 10,000 Lakes. “A once high-trust society devolved into a culture that tolerates the kinds of systemic, large-scale frauds that Somali migrants now perpetrate upon the citizens of Minnesota,” said Steve Cortes, president of the League of American Workers.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz counters that the fraudsters represent a small minority of the state’s Muslim population. The 2024 Democratic Party vice presidential nominee has accused critics of “demonizing” a community that has been saddled with what he says is an unfairly negative image.

However, prosecutors say the Somalis arrested are just a fraction of the total number from the community who participated in the conspiracy to shake down welfare agencies. They say participants who could be prosecuted, if authorities had the staff and resources to bring them all to trial, number as many as 320 potential defendants – and they even include leaders of local mosques. One of the most prominent members of the community who participated in the meals programs is the wife of a Minneapolis city councilman who has talked about creating a “Muslim caucus” on the council.

Prosecutors say they have focused on going after the biggest players in the case, some of whom billed millions of dollars to the government falsely claiming they prepared and served several thousand meals a day to Somali children from their small apartment units. Prosecutors say the one scheme may have bilked as much as half a billion dollars from taxpayers.

It’s not the first time Ellison, who did not respond to requests for comment, has been accused of protecting Muslim constituents from law enforcement.

A college-age convert to Islam, Ellison began his political career in 2007 as the first Muslim elected to Congress. He was sworn in on the Quran. Two years later, the young Muslim congressman would defend an extremist local mosque in his home district where more than 20 Somali men had been radicalized for jihad, according to published local reports at the time.

Also in 2009, he held a meeting in Minneapolis urging Somalis to organize themselves into a powerful political and economic coalition to help fend off FBI investigations, the reports said. At the time, the local Somali community was the target of federal investigations into terrorist money laundering. Agents suspected Somali refugees were funneling millions of dollars in fraudulent food stamps through Somali grocery stores into overseas bank accounts used by al-Qaeda.

Ellison joined forces with CAIR to defend the Somali store owners against the allegations, even meeting with the head of the civil-rights unit of the USDA to complain about the agency’s food stamp investigations, according to a confidential CAIR memo obtained by the authors of “Muslim Mafia.”

He also worked with CAIR to help recruit Muslim candidates for office, as well as Muslim staffers to work on Homeland Security and other sensitive congressional committees. Ellison set a goal of electing 15 more Muslim lawmakers and even envisioned forming a Congressional Muslim Caucus. “I want to see many more Muslims serving in Congress,” including as U.S. senators, he said.

Like Ellison, top CAIR officials came of age attending college in Minneapolis around the same time period. CAIR Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, who roots for “the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future,” and CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, who said he was “happy to see” Hamas massacre Jews on Oct. 7, 2023, got their start as Islamic activists in Minneapolis, where they protested Israel.

Awad, CAIR’s co-founder and national director, is so connected to Hamas that the FBI several years ago decided to cut off community outreach to him and CAIR pending further investigation. While running CAIR’s campaign to elect hundreds of Muslims to office, Awad has personally backed such candidates, providing more than $50,000 of his own money to them in state and federal races, according to Federal Election Commission and other records reviewed by RCI. His most recent recorded donation was a $500 gift in April to Hamawy, the al-Qaeda-tied Democrat running for Congress in New Jersey.

Another powerful Minneapolis Muslim leader is Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minneapolis.

A Somali immigrant, she introduced the initial legislation – the Meals Program Act of 2021 – that loosened regulations on federal food programs and enticed her Somali constituents to create a raft of new nonprofits and meals sites to exploit the bonanza of new federal dollars coming to states.

“She sponsored the act that facilitated the Feeding Our Future fraud, and her congressional district served as its epicenter,” said Scott Johnson, a former Minneapolis attorney and Claremont Institute fellow.

Johnson notes that Omar was close friends with Salim Said, who last year was convicted in the Feeding Our Future case on 21 felony counts and attended the recorded December 2021 meeting with Ellison. She filmed a promotional video for the fraudulent meals program run by Said at his now-infamous Safari Restaurant in Minneapolis, which received more than $16 million in fraudulent Federal Child Nutrition Program funds and was one of the biggest food fraud sites conspiring with Feeding Our Future.

It was Omar’s own MEALS Act that allowed for-profit restaurants like Safari to participate for the first time in the food program normally meant for schools. Prosecutors say Said used the millions he pocketed from taxpayers to buy a mansion and several luxury cars. “Yet despite these facts, Omar claims to have known nothing about the fraud,” a skeptical Johnson said.

Rep. Omar’s sister has been linked to some of the main culprits in the fraud ring. State incorporation records show Sahra Noor used the same residential address for her $20 million consulting firm Grit Partners – 17626 Hyacinth Way in Lakeville, Minn. – as another firm, Diversity Childcare Center LLC, used to register its own office. In 2022, Diversity Childcare’s co-owner pleaded guilty to defrauding the child meals program out of $7 million. Noor, whose husband previously worked for the Minnesota Department of Human Services, has not been charged with a crime.

Omar has strenuously denied knowing about the scheme run out of her district. As the number of fraud cases has swelled, Omar has strongly condemned the misuse of funds intended for children’s meals, though Republican investigators on the Hill are seeking to question her under oath about her possible role in the scandal.

Omar’s Somalia homeland consistently ranks as one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Critics warn that importing the values from nations like Somalia is creating an underworld of criminality in host cities across the U.S., in addition to the broader problem of Islamic customs and laws clashing with modern Western social norms.

“We have seen beautiful nations crying out for help. Germany, France, Sweden and other Western countries have opened their doors to the Islamic threat,” warned Krista Shields, who worked as an American Airlines flight attendant on 9/11 and now lobbies Texas legislators to ban Sharia in her state. “America must learn from their mistakes. If we do not fight back now, Sharia will eventually dominate this culture, and the America that millions fought and died for will cease to exist.”

This article is the seventh in RCI’s series, Islam’s Rise Across America. The series so far:

This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.

Paul Sperry is an investigative reporter for RealClearInvestigations. He is also a longtime media fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution. Sperry was previously the Washington bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily, and his work has appeared in the New York Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Houston Chronicle, among other major publications.

The post American Medinas: Turning US Cities Into ‘Beachheads’ for Islam appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Guest Contributor

Data-Driven Proof That Europe Is a Hollow Shell of Its Former Self

Data-Driven Proof That Europe Is a Hollow Shell of Its Former Self

Data-Driven Proof That Europe Is a Hollow Shell of Its Former Self
August 28, 2026

Europe is in steady decline, while the U.S. outpaces the EU across a broad range of metrics.

Recent reports claim that Mississippi, the poorest U.S. state, now has a higher GDP per capita than the United Kingdom and all but one European country. But the problem extends far beyond Britain, as Europe as a whole is failing across numerous measures, not just GDP per capita.

Europe once produced world-changing ideas and philosophies while building dominant empires, including Rome and Britain, that controlled much of the known world. The British pound sterling was once the world’s leading currency, while French was the language of international diplomacy.

Today, Europe trails the United States in economic, military, and diplomatic power. It also lags in currency strength, competitiveness, birth rates, GDP growth, labor productivity, post-pandemic economic performance, market capitalization, leading global technology firms, artificial intelligence investment, industrial production, energy, and labor costs.

And good luck trying to use French instead of English as a lingua franca in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, Oceania, or virtually anywhere outside Francophone Africa. You’ll get about as far as you would trying to use euros instead of dollars, and you could starve to death in most of the world if all you had were British pounds.

The data reveals a continent that has become a hollow shell of its former self.

The EU’s population is 452.0 million, while the U.S. population is only 342.3 million, and yet the U.S. produces more. Since 2008, EU GDP has grown by just 13.5% in dollar terms, rising from $16.37 trillion to $18.59 trillion. By comparison, U.S. GDP grew by 87%, from $14.77 trillion to $27.72 trillion. As a result, EU GDP fell from 110% of U.S. GDP in 2008 to 67% in 2023. IMF projections for 2026 place U.S. nominal GDP at $32.38 trillion, compared with $23.04 trillion for the EU, a $9.35 trillion gap.

According to World Bank current-dollar GDP-per-capita figures for 2024, the United States recorded $85,810, compared with $44,109 in Germany, $39,441 in France, $47,265 in the United Kingdom, and $40,226 in Italy. As of 2026, U.S. GDP per capita is about 85% higher than the EU average. Overall, EU GDP per capita fell from 76.5% of the U.S. level in 2008 to 50% in 2023.

Between 2015 and 2024, U.S. real GDP growth averaged 2.5% annually against 1.7% in Europe, and U.S. labor productivity growth of 1.3% per year outpaced Europe’s 0.7%. By 2024, U.S. real GDP stood approximately 24% above its three-decade pre-pandemic trend, while eurozone output remained 20% below trend. The Draghi report on EU competitiveness attributes the gap to productivity, noting that only 4 of the world’s 50 largest technology firms are based in Europe.

Germany’s manufacturing sector shows a similar pattern. Industrial production in Germany sits around 10% below its 2018 peak, with a fourth consecutive year of decline in 2025. Unit labor costs in German industry run 22% above the average of comparable countries, and electricity prices in Europe are roughly two and a half times those in the U.S. or China.

Industrial electricity in Germany costs approximately $0.29 per kilowatt-hour, compared with $0.09 in the United States and $0.12 in China. Volkswagen is closing three plants, citing production costs for electric vehicles in Germany running 40% higher than in China, with 35,000 positions to be cut by 2030. ThyssenKrupp faces insolvency, and BASF has shifted investment toward China. Germany’s GDP fell 0.2% in 2024, following a 0.3% decline in 2023.

Nvidia’s market capitalization surpassed $4 trillion in 2025, exceeding the combined value of every listed company on the UK stock market according to LSEG data. Deutsche Bank data places Nvidia’s market cap above the combined stock market capitalizations of Britain, France, and Germany.

Population-weighted fertility rate data from the UN World Population Prospects 2024 Revision places Europe at 1.4 children per woman, against 1.7 for both Asia and the Americas, 2.1 for Oceania, and 4.0 for Africa. At the continent level, Europe has the lowest fertility rate of any continent.

On competitiveness in AI, chips, rockets, drones, and robotics, Europe lags the U.S. and China in AI company formation, with the U.S. dominating private investment and China leading in open model deployment, according to the State of AI Report 2025. The EU’s own reporting on its 3% R&D target shows spending stagnant at 2.2% of GDP in 2024, against 3.6% in the U.S. ASML, based in the Netherlands, holds a global monopoly in extreme ultraviolet lithography equipment used to manufacture advanced chips.

On rockets, the European Space Agency operates the Ariane 6 launch vehicle through Arianespace, though the rocket is fully expendable and Europe is not expected to have reusable launch capability comparable to SpaceX until the 2030s.

Military power: The United States spent $954 billion on defense in 2025, more than double the $430.4 billion spent by all 27 EU member states combined, according to SIPRI and the European Defence Agency.

Despite years of war on the continent, Europe has relied on U.S. weapons, munitions, and intelligence to sustain Ukraine’s defense against Russia, falling far short of its own pledge to produce one million 155mm artillery shells for Ukraine, delivering roughly half the promised total and reaching only about a third of its claimed annual production capacity. The reliance reflects a European defense-industrial base fragmented across 27 separate national procurement systems, compared to a unified U.S. military that operates 11 aircraft carriers, more than China, the UK, France, India, Spain, and Italy combined, and a nuclear triad, capabilities no European country or combination of countries fields independently.

Currency strength: The U.S. dollar held 56.92% of global central bank reserves in the third quarter of 2025, more than double the euro’s 20.33% share, according to IMF COFER data. The British pound holds under 5% of reserves, and zero independent sovereign nations peg their currency to it today. The last members of the “Sterling Area” abandoned their pound pegs in 1972, and the only territories using sterling at par now are British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies such as Gibraltar and the Falklands, not independent countries.

Six sovereign nations outside the U.S., Ecuador, El Salvador, Panama, Timor-Leste, Zimbabwe, and the Marshall Islands, use the dollar as legal tender, with the dollar serving as official or co-official currency in 17 countries and territories total. No European currency, including the euro, has been adopted as legal tender by any sovereign nation outside Europe.

The U.S. dollar is the dominant exchange rate anchor for 19.2% of IMF member countries, while the euro anchors 12.9%. But the composition differs sharply: 14 of the roughly 25 euro-anchored countries are the CFA franc zone states of West and Central Africa, a currency system created by France in 1945 that requires member states to guarantee convertibility through the French Treasury and, until 2020, required them to hold half their foreign reserves in France. Critics, including the Ivory Coast’s own former finance minister, have called the arrangement a colonial relic that African nations have historically been unable to unilaterally exit without financial disruption.

Dollar-anchored countries, by contrast, include Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar, Gulf states with no colonial or historical tie to the U.S. that adopted the dollar peg by independent economic choice.

Dollar invoicing accounts for at least three-fourths of export invoicing in every world region except Europe, and over 96% in the Americas, according to Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller. Even within Europe, the euro’s own invoicing share is only about 50% once intra-euro-area trade is excluded.

Language dominance: English holds official-language status in 67 sovereign countries, and Ethnologue counts English as spoken in 186 countries total as an established language or by a substantial population, more than any other language on earth. French is an official language in 29 sovereign countries, and 65% of French speakers live in Sub-Saharan Africa.

English is a mandatory subject in national education policy in 142 countries worldwide, with a further 41 countries offering it as an elective, according to the University of Winnipeg’s Global English Education Policy project. No comparable global count exists for French as a compulsory subject.

Nearly every metric of national power, economic, military, monetary, linguistic, and demographic, now favors the United States over Europe by a wide and often widening margin. A continent that once ruled empires and set the terms of global commerce and diplomacy has become, by the numbers, a secondary power trailing its former colony.

The post Data-Driven Proof That Europe Is a Hollow Shell of Its Former Self appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Antonio Graceffo

NEVER SURRENDER: Some of the Best Moments from Karoline Leavitt’s Historic Tenure as White House Press Secretary

NEVER SURRENDER: Some of the Best Moments from Karoline Leavitt’s Historic Tenure as White House Press Secretary

NEVER SURRENDER: Some of the Best Moments from Karoline Leavitt’s Historic Tenure as White House Press Secretary
August 28, 2026

NEVER SURRENDER: Karoline Leavitt’s Historic Tenure as White House Press Secretary

The following is from the Trump team.

On Thursday, Karoline Leavitt completed her final day as the 36th White House Press Secretary — the youngest person to ever hold the position and among the best ever to do it. She leaves the James S. Brady Briefing Room after a tenure defined by command, clarity, and an unrelenting defense of President Donald J. Trump and the America First agenda.

President Trump called her “one of the best White House Press Secretaries in the History of the Office” — and that’s the legacy she leaves behind.

Here are only a few of our favorite moments:

    • She refused to let reporters turn the briefing room into a stage for activism: “You’re a left-wing hack. You’re not a reporter. You’re posing in this room as a journalist… You and the people in the media who have such biases but fake like you’re a journalist — you shouldn’t even be sitting in that seat.”

  • She rejected questions that didn’t deserve the dignity of longer replies: “What a stupid question.”
  • She responded with facts: “All of them — because they illegally broke our nation’s laws and therefore, they are criminals.”

  • She declared this Administration would not be lectured by those who failed the country: “We are not going to be lectured about national security and American troops by Democrats and the mainstream media, who turned the other cheek when the Biden Administration, because of their incompetence, left 13 service members dead in Afghanistan and not a single person in the previous Administration was held accountable.”
  • She drew a red line on this Administration’s personnel and purpose: “He identifies pregnant women as ‘pregnant people,’ so that’s not someone who we want in this Administration anyway. If people are not aligned with the President’s vision and the Secretary’s vision to make our country healthy again, then we will gladly show them the door.”
  • She dismissed a low-level French politician’s demand for the Statue of Liberty with history: “It’s only because of the United States of America that the French are not speaking German right now.”

  • She named the playbook when Democrats and their Fake News allies tried to manufacture a crisis: “If this story proves anything, it proves that Democrats and their propagandists in the mainstream media know how to fabricate, orchestrate, and disseminate a misinformation campaign quite well.”
  • She rebuked a foreign leader who attacked the United States and the President: “I saw the South African President running his mouth a little bit against the United States and the President of the United States earlier today, and that language is not appreciated by the President or his team.”
  • She documented the Democrat Crime Crisis with the record, not spin: “There is crime in all states but… if you look at the list of the top 20 high-crime cities in the United States, every single one, with the exception of one, is run by a Democrat.”
  • She exposed the media’s complicity in the Biden cover-up: “I can tell you there was certainly a lack of transparency from the former President, from the entire former Administration, and frankly, a lot of people in this room when it came to the health and the competence of the former President of the United States, Joe Biden. There was one of the greatest coverups and, frankly, political scandals this nation has ever seen.”
  • She spoke directly to Americans abandoned by failed Democrat leadership: “This is our message to Americans in Democrat-run cities nationwide: decline is a choice. You don’t have to live in constant fear of being robbed, raped, or murdered. Your leaders are lying to you — and they have been failing you for decades.”
  • She rejected, without hesitation, suggestions that President Trump stood on weaker moral ground than the Iranian regime: “The President absolutely has the moral high ground over the Iranian terrorist regime — and for you to even suggest otherwise is, frankly, insulting.”
  • She exposed the endless hypocrisy of the Radical Left: “I would just say a strong message to Democrats who are out there pretending to be outraged about the long list of crap that this Administration is cutting — federal waste in funding, like $2 million for sex changes in Guatemala, $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt… Democrats are outraged that the American people want their tax dollars going to good uses, not stuff like this — but then they’re very quiet about the fact that there are still North Carolinians and people in California who have lost everything and in the last four years the federal government did nothing to help them.”
  • She delayed maternity leave after the attempted assassination targeting President Trump: “As I told many of you on Friday afternoon, I thought that would be my last time taking your questions until after my maternity leave — but given the attempted assassination of the President… I felt it was prudent to be here today to answer your questions.”
  • She opened the briefing room to new media — and made clear this White House would take questions from anyone: “It’s essential to our team that we share President Trump’s message everywhere.”
  • She welcomed children into the briefing room on Take Our Sons and Daughters to Work Day — and answered them with the same honesty she brought to the press corps: “I think the most fun part about my job is doing things like this with all of you in the briefing room and answering so many great questions. I think the hardest part of my job is also doing things like this in the briefing room!”
  • And when a question deserved nothing more, she gave it nothing more: “You’re kidding, right?”

Karoline Leavitt truly set a new standard for the White House Press Secretary. She fought for the facts, defended the America First agenda, and never, ever surrendered.

The post NEVER SURRENDER: Some of the Best Moments from Karoline Leavitt’s Historic Tenure as White House Press Secretary appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Joe Hoft

Tina Peters Has an Urgent Message for President Trump

Tina Peters Has an Urgent Message for President Trump

Tina Peters Has an Urgent Message for President Trump
August 28, 2026

Tina Peters Has an Urgent Message for President Trump

 By Martel Maxim

Since June 1, 2026, when Tina Peters was paroled from her sham, Deep State-imposed prison sentence administered by “Judge” Matthew Barrett, she has been working nonstop to bring meaningful changes to our deeply flawed and corrupted election system.  At her own expense, she has made at least 5 trips to Washington, DC, to meet with Trump Administration officials, and on one trip, she personally met with President Trump in the Oval Office.

The stakes couldn’t be higher.  At risk is the existence of America as envisioned by the Founding Fathers 250 years ago.  Over a million military members have died since the Revolutionary War, and about as many received life-threatening wounds in pursuit of defending the Founders’ vision.  Evidently, “Judge” Barrett and all who bore false witness against Tina couldn’t care less about that sticky little fact.  They know who they are.  Tina was not about to have all the pain, agony, and suffering over the last 250 years be for nothing, as all those associated with the Deep State intended it to be.  She personally knows that pain, agony, and suffering all too well, having lost her Navy SEAL son in the line of duty.

The battlefield of war changed dramatically when the computer age arrived in the early 2000s, and accountability for our elections slipped into a black hole of deceit, governed by unaccountable software, administered by unscrupulous electronic election machine companies under the direction of the Deep State.

No longer did military strength matter when it came to seizing control of a country.  This “Country Stealing System” was deployed and perfected without firing a shot.  It was so effective that it operated in complete silence under the cover of darkness until the Spring of 2021, when Tina’s actions as Mesa County, Colorado, Election Clerk uncovered the theft of countless key elections within a “Gold Standard” election system.

However, when Deep State election theft was discovered in the Spring of 2021, the Deep State swung into an unprecedented panic mode, attempting to vilify that one and only Whistleblower Who Saved America, Tina Peters.  Tina’s discovery exposed the key ingredients of how the carefully contrived and manipulated electronic election ecosystem had only one purpose, and that was to “Select, not Elect” our government leadership at will.  When you control who is placed into positions of power, you control a country, and soon the world.  Tina’s comprehensive story can be seen at https://tinapeters.us/.

Tina recently produced a short video for President Trump where she describes the gravity of the situation as the Midterm Elections approach.  That short video can be seen HERE.

In the video, Tina reiterates how important it is that the ability of the current electronically controlled election system to cheat be prevented.  She also describes THIS ROADMAP for rapid implementation in the days that remain until the Midterms.  At the crux of the plan is to Handcount (at a minimum) the key races for the House and Senate, then compare those results to the machine tabulated results.  There are many such handcount systems to choose from, and all that is required is a mandate to implement.

Tina’s dedication to Election Integrity is unmatched, and can be directly measured by the continuing dystopian rhetoric from those in their selected (not elected) positions of power.   Their main mouthpiece, Marc Elias, regularly features his twisted “Democrazy Docket” commentary about her.

To understand this craziness, one needs to understand the havoc Tina caused the Deep State when she divulged their most inner secret weapon for destroying America; that being stolen elections.  The impact is actually of a global nature, as a fall of America would quickly lead to the fall of the world, because America is the shining beacon on a hill.

With little time left until the Midterms, we MUST all immediately listen to Tina.  She knows every detail of what she is talking about and stands behind it.

The post Tina Peters Has an Urgent Message for President Trump appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Joe Hoft