FBI Arrests Massachusetts Democrat State Rep. on COVID Relief Fraud Charges — Second Lawrence-Area Democrat Busted This Month

FBI Arrests Massachusetts Democrat State Rep. on COVID Relief Fraud Charges — Second Lawrence-Area Democrat Busted This Month

FBI Arrests Massachusetts Democrat State Rep. on COVID Relief Fraud Charges — Second Lawrence-Area Democrat Busted This Month
August 26, 2026

Massachusetts State Rep. Francisco Paulino (Credit: Facebook)

The FBI arrested Massachusetts State Rep. Francisco Paulino (D-Methuen) on Wednesday morning after a federal grand jury indicted the second-term Democrat on 11 counts of wire fraud and money laundering.

Prosecutors say Paulino treated COVID relief programs like an ATM, fraudulently obtaining more than $700,000 in pandemic unemployment benefits and Small Business Administration disaster loans.

Paulino represents the 16th Essex District, which includes Methuen and Lawrence, the same Merrimack Valley corridor that just saw Lawrence Mayor Brian DePeña arrested two weeks ago on separate $1.5 million-plus COVID loan fraud and money-laundering charges.

Both men are Dominican-born Democrats. Both, prosecutors allege, used the pandemic as their “personal cash cows.”

The 24-page indictment alleges Paulino ran the operation from roughly April 2020 through at least December 2021 — the same period he was campaigning for and then winning the state House seat he still holds. He used his Lawrence tax-preparation firm, Madison Tax LLC, as the vehicle.

Highlights from the charging documents:

In April 2020 he filed a pandemic unemployment assistance claim in the name of a 77-year-old relative without her knowledge, falsely claiming she was self-employed.

More than $39,000–$44,000 in benefits went straight into a bank account he controlled. He kept filing false weekly certifications into September 2021 and submitted fabricated documents, including purported IRS paperwork, when the state asked questions.

He obtained or modified Economic Injury Disaster Loans for his own businesses (including a Heav’nly Donuts location) and for at least one client who spoke limited English and trusted Paulino with tax records and online banking access.

In one case he allegedly increased a client’s loan without the client’s knowledge, then later asked that same client for a $200,000 loan.

Funds were funneled through intermediaries into Paulino’s personal and business accounts and used for personal expenses, real estate, loan payments, and transfers into his campaign account.

Prosecutors also say he turned around and lent some of the cheap government money to others at higher interest rates, making a profit off the taxpayers’ dime.

Paulino faces eight counts of aiding and abetting wire fraud and three counts of aiding and abetting money laundering. He was taken into custody outside a Lawrence apartment complex shortly after sunrise and is scheduled for arraignment in Boston federal court.

U.S. Attorney Leah Foley called the conduct “appalling.”

U.S. Attorney Leah Foley: “This morning, we arrested Massachusetts State Representative Francisco Paulino, who represents the 16th Essex District, which includes the cities of Lawrence and Methuen, for pandemic unemployment insurance fraud, pandemic loan fraud, and money laundering.

He is charged in an 11-count indictment that was unsealed today. A grand jury in Boston also returned an 11-count indictment charging the sitting mayor of Lawrence, Brian DePina, with pandemic loan fraud and money laundering.

As many of you know, Mayor DePina was arrested last week on a criminal complaint. He is alleged to have stolen approximately $1.5 million in public taxpayer money—money he used to fund his mayoral campaign, pay his personal tax liabilities, and pay off personal loans. The date for his arraignment on the indicted charges has yet to be set.

According to the Paulino indictment, Mr. Paulino devised a scheme to fraudulently obtain more than $700,000 in federal pandemic-related relief funds. It is alleged that Paulino used some of the money for his own personal use, including real estate expenses, loan payments, and transfers to his campaign account.

Other money he flipped around and lent to other individuals at higher interest rates than the pandemic loan rate, basically making more money for himself at the expense of others.

Prior to being elected to a seat in the Massachusetts House of Representatives in November of 2021, it is alleged that Paulino ran several businesses, including Madison Tax in Lawrence. Madison Tax provided tax preparation and business planning services to small businesses.

Paulino’s alleged fraud began in April of 2020, when he allegedly filed an online application for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance benefits—not for himself, but rather in the name of an unwitting 77-year-old relative. The application falsely claimed that the relative had worked for Madison Tax in 2019.

Once the unemployment claim was approved based on the false information Paulino submitted, funds were deposited into an account that Paulino controlled. From April of 2020 until September of 2021, Paulino filed false weekly certifications with the Massachusetts Department of Unemployment Assistance, all in the relative’s name.

These unemployment benefits that Paulino fraudulently obtained for himself totaled over $44,000.

Paulino also allegedly filed fraudulent paperwork with the Small Business Administration in order to obtain Economic Injury Disaster Loans, commonly referred to as EIDLs. Some of these applications were for businesses Paulino owned, and others were filed in the name of a business owned by a client of Madison Tax.

It is alleged that Paulino used the fraudulently obtained money for his own benefit.

First, Paulino allegedly filed an application for an EIDL in which he falsely represented that the revenues of one of his businesses, Jackson Enterprise, were over $426,000 during the time frame of January of 2019 to January of 2020. The problem is that the business wasn’t in operation until August of 2020.

The SBA approved the loan based on the alleged false information and sent $136,000 to an account controlled by Paulino.

It is further alleged that Paulino obtained an EIDL of over $109,000 for Madison Tax in May of 2020 and later requested an increase to the Madison Tax EIDL.

In July of 2021, the SBA approved an increase of over $290,000 to Madison Tax’s EIDL, and Paulino falsely certified that he would use that $290,000 as working capital for Madison Tax.

Instead, it is alleged that he loaned most of that money to other individuals through another of his businesses, Madison Mortgage, charging interest rates significantly higher than the interest rate he was getting for the Madison Tax loan.

It is further alleged that Paulino took advantage of one of his tax clients by misrepresenting the terms and conditions for obtaining EIDL loans.

As alleged in the indictment, based on applications Paulino filed, the SBA awarded over $345,000 in EIDL loans to his client’s business. Paulino then had that client forward $200,000 of those funds to him, which he used to partially fund a $680,000 mortgage for an individual for the purchase of real property.

The interest rate Paulino charged on the mortgage loan was higher than the interest rate from the EIDL.

In total, it is alleged that Paulino fraudulently obtained over $700,000 in federal benefits that he was not entitled to and used the funds to line his own pockets.

The conduct alleged by the Lawrence mayor and the district state representative is appalling.

Everyone listening today knows how difficult it was for Americans during the pandemic and how challenging it was for businesses. The money these two individuals allegedly scammed was meant for hardworking Americans and struggling business owners, not for two greedy individuals who lied and stole for their own personal benefit.

I think it should be clear now that we are taking fraud seriously in Massachusetts. From SNAP and housing fraud to voter fraud to pandemic relief fraud, we are dialed in and laser-focused on rooting out every bit we find.

We will continue to hold fraudsters accountable until the stealing stops.

It is never a proud moment when we arrest a public official, but we will continue to do it until the message is received.

No one is above the law, and no one gets a pass.

Now, I’m going to turn things over to the FBI.”

WATCH:

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft

BREAKING: Maryland Judge Blocks Democrats’ Attempt to Eliminate State’s Only Republican House Seat

BREAKING: Maryland Judge Blocks Democrats’ Attempt to Eliminate State’s Only Republican House Seat

BREAKING: Maryland Judge Blocks Democrats’ Attempt to Eliminate State’s Only Republican House Seat
August 26, 2026

A Maryland judge on Wednesday blocked the Democrats’ attempt to eliminate the state’s only Republican House seat.

Democrats proposed a constitutional amendment to eliminate the only Republican House seat in Maryland.

Maryland’s Democrat Governor Wes Moore recently called a special legislative session that could have paved the way for the Democrats to add an addition House seat amid the redistricting wars.

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court Judge Robert Thompson ruled that the Democrat lawmakers violate their own July deadlines for ballot measures.

The judge sided with the Oversight Project.

The AP reported:

A Maryland court has ruled against a proposed constitutional amendment that could have paved the way for Democrats to redraw the state’s congressional districts ahead of the 2028 elections.

The ruling Wednesday by a judge in the state’s capital city marks another setback in Democrats’ national attempts to counter a Republican redistricting movement pushed by President Donald Trump ahead of this year’s elections. The judge ruled that the amendment cannot appear on the November ballot, but he paused the effect of that ruling to allow for an appeal to the state Supreme Court.

Democrats already control seven of Maryland’s eight congressional seats. Democratic Gov. Wes Moore called lawmakers into a special session in August with a goal of making it easier to claim that final seat.

An amendment referred to the ballot by lawmakers seeks to sidestep a court ruling that struck down a previous Democratic redistricting plan in 2022. It would declare that a constitutional requirement for districts to be compact and take into account “natural boundaries” applies only to state legislative districts, not congressional ones.

The post BREAKING: Maryland Judge Blocks Democrats’ Attempt to Eliminate State’s Only Republican House Seat appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cristina Laila

“Anything You Say Will Be Used Against You” — British Woman Arrested for Tweet Speaks Out in New Interview (Video)

“Anything You Say Will Be Used Against You” — British Woman Arrested for Tweet Speaks Out in New Interview (Video)

“Anything You Say Will Be Used Against You” — British Woman Arrested for Tweet Speaks Out in New Interview (Video)
August 26, 2026

Bernadette Spofforth/Image: @Artemisfornow/X

Bernadette “Bernie” Spofforth was caught up in Great Britain Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s crackdown on online speech.

The Gateway Pundit reported that British authorities have warned that “keyboard warriors” will be arrested.

Met Police Commissioner Mark Rowley told reporters, “We will throw the full force of the law at people. And whether you’re in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further afield online, we will come after you.”

“You can be guilty of offenses of incitement, of stirring up racial hatred; there are numerous terrorist offenses regarding the publishing of material.”

As an attack on children attending a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport, England, was unfolding, Spofforth weighed in on social media.

Spofforth’s post on X, which she has since taken down, read, “Ali Al-Shakati was the suspect. He was an asylum seeker who came to the UK by boat last year and was on an MI6 watch list.”

“If this is true, then all hell is about to break loose.”

Spofforth came under police investigation and was then accused of sharing misinformation and misidentifying the assailant.

The mother of three was ultimately arrested for her post.

She was accused of allegedly “inciting racial hatred and spreading false news through written means” and detained for 36 hours.

During the investigation, and while she was out on bail, she was unable to respond to messages or questions regarding the incident.

Following the incident of governmental overreach, Spofforth shared her personal story.

Spofforth recently joined The Winston Marshall Show to discuss her experience and share a warning for others.

Marshall began, “Every year, 12,000 people in Britain are arrested for social media posts. You are one of those arrested.”

Spofforth responded, “Actually, what I’d done was seen the news about Southport, picked up my phone and a post came up. And so I copied and pasted it and I put …four days later. They all turned up to come and arrest me. It was horrendous. As that arrest happened, I knew my entire career was over. I have family who would not speak to me, colleagues who sent emails saying, ‘never contact me ever again.’”

Marshall asked, “How is it, do you think, we got to a point where a very normal, free-thinking person like yourself is arrested for a tweet like this?”

Spofforth replied, “This has been a long time coming. In the ’90s, during Blair’s time, we changed the rules and called it parallel lives.”

“The way to keep control is to control information and to control speech. I think the biggest racists are those who believe that people of a culture in the developing world will just drop their culture and their god and take a Western one because we’re better.”

“The clampdown on free speech is to frighten people into shutting up.”

Watch:

Watch the full interview below:

The post “Anything You Say Will Be Used Against You” — British Woman Arrested for Tweet Speaks Out in New Interview (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Margaret Flavin

Surrogacy’s Deadly Return Policy (VIDEO)

Surrogacy’s Deadly Return Policy (VIDEO)

Surrogacy’s Deadly Return Policy (VIDEO)
August 26, 2026

There is a dark side to the surrogacy industry that no one wants to talk about.

When money, contracts, and abortion clauses enter the equation, babies can start being treated less like precious human lives and more like products. And when that “product” doesn’t arrive exactly as ordered, suddenly there’s a conversation about canceling the order.

Baby Gabriel exposes just how disturbing that mindset can become.

Surrogate mother McKenna West was carrying a baby for a California couple when doctors discovered around 20 weeks that he suffered from a rare and serious heart defect. According to West and court filings, the intended parents wanted the pregnancy terminated. West refused. She ultimately fled Alaska for Texas, determined to give this baby a chance at life. Baby Gabriel was born on August 12 and is now receiving critical medical care as a bitter court battle continues.

Think about what we have become. A child develops a medical problem, and abortion becomes an acceptable escape clause in a contract.

A baby is not a defective product. A womb is not a factory. And abortion is not a return policy.

On Stinchfield, we expose the dark side of commercial surrogacy and the culture that has convinced too many people that an unborn child’s value depends on whether that child is healthy, convenient, or wanted.

Life is precious. Especially when it is inconvenient. Especially when it is imperfect.

Baby Gabriel deserved a chance to live. Every baby does.

The post Surrogacy’s Deadly Return Policy (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Grant Stinchfield

BREAKING: Obama Judge Indira Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction Blocking Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Safeguards After Supreme Court Rebuke

BREAKING: Obama Judge Indira Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction Blocking Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Safeguards After Supreme Court Rebuke

BREAKING: Obama Judge Indira Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction Blocking Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Safeguards After Supreme Court Rebuke
August 26, 2026

Indira Talwani speaking at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, with water bottles and audience members visible in the background.
Indira Talwani (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee)

It’s official.

Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, the same Boston activist who spent the last two months trying to kill President Trump’s mail-in ballot security order, has now been forced to lift her nationwide injunction.

The Justice Department asked her to reconsider after the Supreme Court slapped down her other block on Monday.

On Wednesday she folded. In a nine-page order, Talwani conceded that, after Trump v. California, the League of Women Voters plaintiffs are “not likely to prevail as to ripeness” unless they rewrite their complaint now that the Postal Service has issued a final rule.

She didn’t do it happily. Reporting around the order makes clear the Supreme Court’s decision “compelled” her to toss the freeze even as she kept smearing the president’s election-integrity directive as likely to unleash “chaos.”

That’s the tell. When an Obama judge suddenly discovers the law after the Supreme Court has already spoken, it isn’t a conversion. It’s a retreat.

Just yesterday, we reported that Talwani went completely rogue, accusing the U.S. Postal Service of “violating” her injunction by finishing the very rulemaking the Supreme Court had just allowed to proceed, then imposing no remedy except a lecture.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, she accused the administration of having “feigned complete compliance” even though the final rule itself said USPS would not implement the 2026 changes until the injunctions were lifted.

Today those injunctions are down.

On March 31, President Trump signed Executive Order 14399, Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections. The order did two things Democrats cannot stand:

  • Directed DHS, working with the Social Security Administration, to compile state-by-state lists of confirmed U.S. citizens age 18 and older.
  • Directed the Postal Service to stop treating federal ballot mail like a free-for-all and transmit mail-in and absentee ballots only under uniform security rules, including official Election Mail markings, unique Intelligent Mail barcodes, and state-submitted lists of the voters receiving those ballots.

In plain English: the federal government should not be hauling ballots across the country to names that have never been checked against federal citizenship and identity records.

That is not “voter suppression.” That is the bare minimum in a country that has spent six years watching Democrats mass-mail ballots, harvest them, and then scream “democracy” when anyone asks for a list.

The Supreme Court, 6-3, already stayed Talwani’s companion injunction in the blue-state attorneys general case on Monday, finding those states sued too early and that her freeze was inflicting real harm on the executive branch. DHS can proceed with the citizenship lists.

The attorney general can prioritize cases against officials who pump federal ballots out to ineligible people. USPS rulemaking is no longer frozen by that order.

The final USPS rule, “Ballot Mail for Federal Elections,” is now published. States that want the Postal Service to carry their federal mail ballots must use approved envelope standards and feed the Federal Ballot Mail Portal:

  • Name of the person receiving the ballot
  • Address
  • Unique barcode on the outbound envelope
  • Unique barcode on the return envelope
  • Originating state

Ballots that don’t meet the standard can be rejected and sent back to election officials for correction. USPS has said the point is tracking, fraud reduction, and getting the right ballot to the right eligible voter.

If a state refuses to play ball, it does not get to use the United States mail as an unaccountable ballot pipeline. That is the part that sent the League of Women Voters, the ACLU, and two dozen Democrat attorneys general into orbit.

The post BREAKING: Obama Judge Indira Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction Blocking Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Safeguards After Supreme Court Rebuke appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft

JUST IN: Federal Appeals Court Rejects Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s Immunity Defense After She Assaulted ICE Agents

JUST IN: Federal Appeals Court Rejects Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s Immunity Defense After She Assaulted ICE Agents

JUST IN: Federal Appeals Court Rejects Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s Immunity Defense After She Assaulted ICE Agents
August 26, 2026

A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s immunity defense after she assaulted ICE agents at a Newark ICE detention center last year.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected LaMonica McIver’s argument that she was immune from prosecution because of the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause.

This is the latest legal set back for LaMonica McIver.

Last year, a federal judge declined to toss out the federal charges against Rep. McIver.

Politico reported:

Rep. LaMonica McIver is not immune from prosecution for her contact with ICE officials during a heated scrum at New Jersey’s Delaney Hall detention facility, even though it occurred during a legislative investigation, a federal appeals court panel ruled Wednesday.

“The charged conduct … is unambiguously non-legislative,” 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Cindy Chung, a Biden appointee, wrote in a 2-1 opinion joined by Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee.

McIver is facing three federal charges related to alleged assaults on ICE officials and interference with them during a May 2025 oversight visit to Delaney Hall. McIver and two other Democratic lawmakers were present when federal officials moved into a small crowd to arrest Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who joined them on the oversight visit. The confrontation escalated and became physical, and McIver was ultimately charged with making physical contact with the officials.

The 3rd Circuit ruling sustains the bulk of the criminal case against the Democratic lawmaker despite her protestation that the charges were brought for political purposes. McIver pointed to commentary by Trump, his allies and the former federal prosecutor who brought the case at the time: Alina Habba, a former Trump personal lawyer and current White House aide.

In June 2025, a federal grand jury returned a 3-count indictment charging Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver with forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers at the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark.

McIver is facing a maximum of 17 years in prison for all three counts.

McIver previously pleaded not guilty.

LaMonica McIver verbally abused and physically assaulted federal agents at a detention facility in Newark in May.

ICE bodycam footage revealed Rep. LaMonica McIver was verbally abusing federal agents and threatening to destroy their careers.

“I touch whoever I want motherf*cker!” McIver shouted.

The post JUST IN: Federal Appeals Court Rejects Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s Immunity Defense After She Assaulted ICE Agents appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cristina Laila