Surrogacy’s Deadly Return Policy (VIDEO)

Surrogacy’s Deadly Return Policy (VIDEO)

Surrogacy’s Deadly Return Policy (VIDEO)
August 26, 2026

There is a dark side to the surrogacy industry that no one wants to talk about.

When money, contracts, and abortion clauses enter the equation, babies can start being treated less like precious human lives and more like products. And when that “product” doesn’t arrive exactly as ordered, suddenly there’s a conversation about canceling the order.

Baby Gabriel exposes just how disturbing that mindset can become.

Surrogate mother McKenna West was carrying a baby for a California couple when doctors discovered around 20 weeks that he suffered from a rare and serious heart defect. According to West and court filings, the intended parents wanted the pregnancy terminated. West refused. She ultimately fled Alaska for Texas, determined to give this baby a chance at life. Baby Gabriel was born on August 12 and is now receiving critical medical care as a bitter court battle continues.

Think about what we have become. A child develops a medical problem, and abortion becomes an acceptable escape clause in a contract.

A baby is not a defective product. A womb is not a factory. And abortion is not a return policy.

On Stinchfield, we expose the dark side of commercial surrogacy and the culture that has convinced too many people that an unborn child’s value depends on whether that child is healthy, convenient, or wanted.

Life is precious. Especially when it is inconvenient. Especially when it is imperfect.

Baby Gabriel deserved a chance to live. Every baby does.

The post Surrogacy’s Deadly Return Policy (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Grant Stinchfield

BREAKING: Obama Judge Indira Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction Blocking Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Safeguards After Supreme Court Rebuke

BREAKING: Obama Judge Indira Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction Blocking Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Safeguards After Supreme Court Rebuke

BREAKING: Obama Judge Indira Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction Blocking Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Safeguards After Supreme Court Rebuke
August 26, 2026

Indira Talwani speaking at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, with water bottles and audience members visible in the background.
Indira Talwani (U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee)

It’s official.

Obama-appointed U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, the same Boston activist who spent the last two months trying to kill President Trump’s mail-in ballot security order, has now been forced to lift her nationwide injunction.

The Justice Department asked her to reconsider after the Supreme Court slapped down her other block on Monday.

On Wednesday she folded. In a nine-page order, Talwani conceded that, after Trump v. California, the League of Women Voters plaintiffs are “not likely to prevail as to ripeness” unless they rewrite their complaint now that the Postal Service has issued a final rule.

She didn’t do it happily. Reporting around the order makes clear the Supreme Court’s decision “compelled” her to toss the freeze even as she kept smearing the president’s election-integrity directive as likely to unleash “chaos.”

That’s the tell. When an Obama judge suddenly discovers the law after the Supreme Court has already spoken, it isn’t a conversion. It’s a retreat.

Just yesterday, we reported that Talwani went completely rogue, accusing the U.S. Postal Service of “violating” her injunction by finishing the very rulemaking the Supreme Court had just allowed to proceed, then imposing no remedy except a lecture.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, she accused the administration of having “feigned complete compliance” even though the final rule itself said USPS would not implement the 2026 changes until the injunctions were lifted.

Today those injunctions are down.

On March 31, President Trump signed Executive Order 14399, Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections. The order did two things Democrats cannot stand:

  • Directed DHS, working with the Social Security Administration, to compile state-by-state lists of confirmed U.S. citizens age 18 and older.
  • Directed the Postal Service to stop treating federal ballot mail like a free-for-all and transmit mail-in and absentee ballots only under uniform security rules, including official Election Mail markings, unique Intelligent Mail barcodes, and state-submitted lists of the voters receiving those ballots.

In plain English: the federal government should not be hauling ballots across the country to names that have never been checked against federal citizenship and identity records.

That is not “voter suppression.” That is the bare minimum in a country that has spent six years watching Democrats mass-mail ballots, harvest them, and then scream “democracy” when anyone asks for a list.

The Supreme Court, 6-3, already stayed Talwani’s companion injunction in the blue-state attorneys general case on Monday, finding those states sued too early and that her freeze was inflicting real harm on the executive branch. DHS can proceed with the citizenship lists.

The attorney general can prioritize cases against officials who pump federal ballots out to ineligible people. USPS rulemaking is no longer frozen by that order.

The final USPS rule, “Ballot Mail for Federal Elections,” is now published. States that want the Postal Service to carry their federal mail ballots must use approved envelope standards and feed the Federal Ballot Mail Portal:

  • Name of the person receiving the ballot
  • Address
  • Unique barcode on the outbound envelope
  • Unique barcode on the return envelope
  • Originating state

Ballots that don’t meet the standard can be rejected and sent back to election officials for correction. USPS has said the point is tracking, fraud reduction, and getting the right ballot to the right eligible voter.

If a state refuses to play ball, it does not get to use the United States mail as an unaccountable ballot pipeline. That is the part that sent the League of Women Voters, the ACLU, and two dozen Democrat attorneys general into orbit.

The post BREAKING: Obama Judge Indira Talwani Forced to Lift Nationwide Injunction Blocking Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Safeguards After Supreme Court Rebuke appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft

JUST IN: Federal Appeals Court Rejects Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s Immunity Defense After She Assaulted ICE Agents

JUST IN: Federal Appeals Court Rejects Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s Immunity Defense After She Assaulted ICE Agents

JUST IN: Federal Appeals Court Rejects Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s Immunity Defense After She Assaulted ICE Agents
August 26, 2026

A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s immunity defense after she assaulted ICE agents at a Newark ICE detention center last year.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected LaMonica McIver’s argument that she was immune from prosecution because of the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause.

This is the latest legal set back for LaMonica McIver.

Last year, a federal judge declined to toss out the federal charges against Rep. McIver.

Politico reported:

Rep. LaMonica McIver is not immune from prosecution for her contact with ICE officials during a heated scrum at New Jersey’s Delaney Hall detention facility, even though it occurred during a legislative investigation, a federal appeals court panel ruled Wednesday.

“The charged conduct … is unambiguously non-legislative,” 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Cindy Chung, a Biden appointee, wrote in a 2-1 opinion joined by Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee.

McIver is facing three federal charges related to alleged assaults on ICE officials and interference with them during a May 2025 oversight visit to Delaney Hall. McIver and two other Democratic lawmakers were present when federal officials moved into a small crowd to arrest Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who joined them on the oversight visit. The confrontation escalated and became physical, and McIver was ultimately charged with making physical contact with the officials.

The 3rd Circuit ruling sustains the bulk of the criminal case against the Democratic lawmaker despite her protestation that the charges were brought for political purposes. McIver pointed to commentary by Trump, his allies and the former federal prosecutor who brought the case at the time: Alina Habba, a former Trump personal lawyer and current White House aide.

In June 2025, a federal grand jury returned a 3-count indictment charging Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver with forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers at the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark.

McIver is facing a maximum of 17 years in prison for all three counts.

McIver previously pleaded not guilty.

LaMonica McIver verbally abused and physically assaulted federal agents at a detention facility in Newark in May.

ICE bodycam footage revealed Rep. LaMonica McIver was verbally abusing federal agents and threatening to destroy their careers.

“I touch whoever I want motherf*cker!” McIver shouted.

The post JUST IN: Federal Appeals Court Rejects Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver’s Immunity Defense After She Assaulted ICE Agents appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cristina Laila

NEW: Legendary Character Actor Tim Curry, Who Starred in “The Rocky Horror Picture Show” and “It,” Has Died

NEW: Legendary Character Actor Tim Curry, Who Starred in “The Rocky Horror Picture Show” and “It,” Has Died

NEW: Legendary Character Actor Tim Curry, Who Starred in “The Rocky Horror Picture Show” and “It,” Has Died
August 26, 2026

English actor Tim Curry. Credit: Wikimedia Commons

One of Hollywood’s great character actors has tragically passed away.

As TMZ reported, British actor Tim Curry, who first became famous for playing Dr. Frank-N-Furter in the cult classic “The Rocky Horror Picture Show,” died last night at his Los Angeles home. He was 80 years old.

Per the outlet, police responded to a call to his house at roughly 11:23 PM. They do not suspect any foul play.

A cause of death was not immediately available.

Before his star turn in “The Rocky Horror Picture Show,” Curry began his acting career in London theater. He appeared as part of the original West End cast of the musical “Hair” in 1968.

Curry also captured audiences with his performance as the clown Pennywise from the 1990 adaptation of Stephen King’s “It” along with his role as Mr. Hector in “Home Alone 2.”

The latter featured a famous cameo by President Trump.

Curry’s other prominent film roles include “Annie,” “FernGully,” The Hunt for Red October,” “Muppet Treasure Island,” and “Addams Family Reunion.”

He also received a Daytime Emmy Award for his performance in 1991’s “Peter Pan and the Pirates,” and an Artistic Achievement Award in 2015 from the Actors’ Fund of America.

Tragedy struck for Curry when he suffered a major stroke in 2012 while receiving a massage at his home.

Ironically, he felt completely fine at the time, but his therapist noticed some troubling signs and called 911 against his wishes.

This move saved Curry’s life, but he was confined to a wheelchair for the remainder of his life.

As a result of the stroke, Curry pulled back from his acting career then and instead focused on voiceover projects.

Curry never married nor had children, and kept his personal life completely private.

The post NEW: Legendary Character Actor Tim Curry, Who Starred in “The Rocky Horror Picture Show” and “It,” Has Died appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cullen Linebarger

Federal Judge Slams Ghislaine Maxwell’s Petition, Denies Yet Another Attempt by Epstein’s Co-Conspirator To Overturn Her Conviction and 20-Year Prison Sentence

Federal Judge Slams Ghislaine Maxwell’s Petition, Denies Yet Another Attempt by Epstein’s Co-Conspirator To Overturn Her Conviction and 20-Year Prison Sentence

Federal Judge Slams Ghislaine Maxwell’s Petition, Denies Yet Another Attempt by Epstein’s Co-Conspirator To Overturn Her Conviction and 20-Year Prison Sentence
August 26, 2026

Dangerous liaisons: Maxwell’s life destroyed by her long association with Epstein

Another appeal, another defeat.

Ghislaine Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse multiple minor girls with Jeffrey Epstein over the course of a decade.

Following a blockbuster one-month jury trial, Maxwell was found guilty on December 29, 2021, of ‘conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, transporting a minor to participate in illegal sex acts, sex trafficking conspiracy, and sex trafficking of a minor’.

So, that’s the end of her, right? Wrong.

Ever since her conviction, Maxwell is devoted to a seemingly endless series of appeals, trying to overturn both conviction and sentencing.

First, she filed a direct appeal to the Second Circuit that was denied in November 2024.

Then, she had her Supreme Court petition denied in October 2025.

Now, she had a ‘Pro se habeas’ petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 going. But this week, a federal judge struck down yet another attempt by Maxwell to vacate her sex trafficking conviction and 20-year prison sentence.

Politico reported:

“In a 67-page ruling made public Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer slammed Maxwell’s petition to vacate her conviction and sentence as ‘demonstrably meritless, and generally based on speculation, distortions, and/or outright falsehoods’.

Maxwell argued that many documents released by the Department of Justice earlier this year under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed by Congress in November 2025, supported that her due process rights were violated. She made other claims of juror misconduct, inaccurate evidence and selective prosecution by the Justice Department, which she claimed targeted her as a scapegoat.

Engelmayer, a New York-based Obama appointee, called Maxwell’s claims ‘all meritless and all or almost all are frivolous’. ‘On the contrary, to the extent it is relevant, far from exculpating her, it incriminates her or reinforces the correctness of the legal rulings Maxwell challenges’, he said of her claims.”

“Maxwell was transferred to a less restrictive, minimum-security federal prison camp in Texas in 2025, days after sitting down with now-Attorney General Todd Blanche for an interview as the Trump administration faced backlash over its handling of the Epstein files.”

Maxwell has exhausted all avenues of appeal, and could only regain her freedom by presidential executive clemency (pardon or commutation), which at this point is not a realistic outcome.

Read more:

Former Top Clinton Aide Doug Band Had an Embarrassing Day as He Was Grilled in Front of Congress Over Jeffrey Epstein Ties, His Flirtations With Ghislaine Maxwell

The post Federal Judge Slams Ghislaine Maxwell’s Petition, Denies Yet Another Attempt by Epstein’s Co-Conspirator To Overturn Her Conviction and 20-Year Prison Sentence appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Paul Serran

Dem Senator Stumbles Into Word Salad After Anderson Cooper Asks Him What’s Wrong with Ensuring Voters Are Eligible

Dem Senator Stumbles Into Word Salad After Anderson Cooper Asks Him What’s Wrong with Ensuring Voters Are Eligible

Dem Senator Stumbles Into Word Salad After Anderson Cooper Asks Him What’s Wrong with Ensuring Voters Are Eligible
August 26, 2026

Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut struggled to give a clear answer on Monday when asked by CNN’s Anderson Cooper about President Donald Trump’s executive order related to mail-in ballots.

Earlier in the day, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump’s order related to ensuring only U.S. citizens vote by mail-in ballot could go forward.

The directive requires states to send a list of the names of those receiving mail-in ballots so their eligibility to vote can be verified, with the Department of Homeland Security working in conjunction with the Social Security Administration.

“The Federal Government has an unavoidable duty under Article II of the Constitution of the United States to enforce Federal law, which includes preventing violations of Federal criminal law and maintaining public confidence in election outcomes,” the order read.

The U.S. Postal Service was instructed not to deliver ballots to those unverified as citizens.

Further, states are required to have “unique ballot envelope identifiers, such as bar codes, [to] enable confirmation that only citizens receive and cast ballots, reducing the risk of fraud and protecting the integrity of Federal elections.”

“In your view, what is the harm in the Department of Homeland Security creating a list of eligible voters?” Cooper asked Murphy.

“Well, ultimately, Trump doesn’t want people to vote, and he’s going to be very selective about who he doesn’t want to vote. He doesn’t want people who are more likely to vote for Democrats to vote,” Murphy said.

“So he’s going to instruct either the Department of Homeland Security or the Postal Service, potentially, to remove people from the voter rolls or to profile people for removal from the voter rolls that are more likely to vote for Democrats, for instance, people who live in cities,” the lawmaker continued, as Cooper remained expressionless.

So his argument apparently is that if non-citizens vote, they are more likely to vote Democrat.

Murphy, who is reportedly considering a 2028 run for president, then went off the topic of voter integrity entirely, saying Trump is using his position as president to enrich himself.

“Trump is going to use whatever power he has available to him to make himself rich. He’s going to use whatever power he has available to him to try to steal the election,” he alleged.

In its Monday 6-3 ruling reversing the injunction, the Supreme Court did not decide whether Trump’s mail-in ballot order is lawful, but determined the 23 states suing to block it did not have standing because they could not prove any “concrete” harms had been suffered by their citizens, concluding their arguments are “conjecture.”

In her dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused the majority of “[t]aking its eye off the ball” and thus “miss[ing] the Government’s actual objective: to secure our imprimatur for its effort to foment chaos ahead of the November elections.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, wrote in a separate dissenting opinion, “Today’s decision does not address whether the President’s attempts to interfere with States’ administration of the November 2026 elections are lawful. Nor does it suggest that the Executive Branch has any constitutional or statutory authority to implement the President’s directives. Instead, today’s decision merely postpones adjudication of those challenges.”

The states challenging Trump’s order wrote in their brief to the Supreme Court that implementing it “would allow the federal government to rush out an unprecedented, legally indefensible voter-verification and ballot-interception program that would, among other things, give the U.S. Postal Service far-reaching new powers and responsibilities.”

But SCOTUSBlog reported that Alabama and 11 other states supporting the order countered in their brief that two recent rulings by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit involving the same executive order concluded it was too early to challenge it without proof of actual harm to the states.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Dem Senator Stumbles Into Word Salad After Anderson Cooper Asks Him What’s Wrong with Ensuring Voters Are Eligible appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Randy DeSoto, The Western Journal