Fever Coach Steph White Appears Partially to Blame for the Continued Abuse of Caitlin Clark
June 29, 2026
Fever Coach Steph White Appears Partially to Blame for the Continued Abuse of Caitlin Clark
Coach White is partially to blame for the abuse of Caitlin Clark. She allows the abuse to continue and continually turns the other way. This is not surprising, knowing White’s history.
White had a losing record at Vanderbilt every year she coached there. When she was finally fired, she joined the failing WNBA.
BUCKLE UP! THIS IS INSANE!
Nothing says we have a 5 alarm fire than a voice recorded former player sounding off on Stephanie WHITE, during her time at Vandy!
OMG this is CRAZY!
OK.
I want to preface I have not been able to verify this player. I will say that this podcaster (whom I am forgetting but will get his name and pass on for credit) has been doing the leg work (that others won’t do)and I tend to believe this interview is a real player discussing her experience, while at Vandy.
If real this is insane and thee smoking gun. It’s beyond alarming. But it makes complete sense for what we are seeing now unfolding behind the scene on the Fever!
This interview and the players allegations of what happened when she was at Vandy sounds like what could be happening on the Fever. It also sounds exactly like what happened (reported events) at Vanderbilt during Stephanie White’s coaching tenure at a school where 9 players left which (during Steph’s Tenure) including the entire starting 5!
My question for the Fever Front Office is this.
Did anyone do their due diligence on Stephanie White?
Did Amber who brought Steph in from CONN to the Fever look into the allegations and the reason for SW Firing at Vandy besides the 46-83 record?
The Fever seem to be leaving a very incompetent Coach to manage the greatest talent in the history of the league.
Any Board of Directors worth a damn should be alarmed at the lack of due diligence and combining that with all the drama we have seen from the sideline this year and they should be calling for an immediate FIRING of the Coach and the GM!
This isn’t a hard call. If the allegations prove true, and they appear to be true, then this is the greatest mismanagement in the history of Sports.
The jury decided that E. Jean Carroll did not prove Trump raped her.
However, the jury said E. Jean Carroll proved Trump sexually abused her when he ‘inserted fingers into her vagina.’
In a separate defamation case brought by E. Jean Carroll, In January 2024, Trump was ordered to pay $83.3 million in damages to Carroll.
Last month it was reported that the Justice Department has launched an investigation into the funding E. Jean Carroll received by billionaire Reid Hoffman for lawsuits against President Trump.
RINOS NEVER LEARN! Out-of-Touch ‘Never Trumper’ John Kasich Sparking Massive Backlash After Demanding Congress Protect Illegal Haitian Migrants Over Hardworking Ohioans
June 29, 2026
Disgraced former Ohio Governor and serial “Never Trumper” John Kasich is facing a tsunami of well-deserved blowback after taking to social media to cry tears for illegal migrants while completely ignoring the plight of his own former constituents.
In a stunningly tone-deaf post, Kasich attacked a recent Supreme Court decision that would finally allow Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to expire, paving the way for the rule of law to be restored in places like Springfield, Ohio.
Kasich posted the following on social media:
“The Supreme Court has allowed TPS for Haitians to end, putting families in Springfield and communities across the country at risk of being sent back to a country in chaos. Congress can and should extend these protections.”
In an accompanying video, he doubled down:
“The Supreme Court decision has said that Haitians are going to have to be removed from Springfield, Ohio. I guess I understand that, but there is an opportunity for the Congress to extend temporary protection status because things in Haiti are just deteriorating, and sending people back there with their families, to me, is just crazy. I wish the Congress would extend this for the Haitians, but if not, they’ll say that that’s the law. And to quote somebody, a figure from a Charles Dickens — Dickensian novel. If that’s the law, then the law is an ass.”
The audacity.
WATCH:
The Supreme Court has allowed TPS for Haitians to end, putting families in Springfield and communities across the country at risk of being sent back to a country in chaos. Congress can and should extend these protections. pic.twitter.com/cXoeacoIZ9
As The Gateway Pundit has previously reported, Springfield, Ohio was ground zero for the Biden border catastrophe. Over 15,000 Haitian migrants flooded the small city in a short period, overwhelming housing, schools, hospitals, and police resources. Rents exploded. Crime rose. Residents reported pets being stolen and eaten.
The community was pushed to the breaking point while politicians like Kasich stayed mostly quiet or enabled the policies that caused it.
Now that the Supreme Court has said the law means what it says and the Trump administration can actually enforce removals, Kasich suddenly discovers his voice, to complain that sending people back to Haiti is “crazy.”
Haiti has been a dysfunctional, chaotic failed state for generations. That is precisely why TPS was never intended to become permanent welfare and work authorization for hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals at American taxpayers’ expense. The program has an end date for a reason.
Social media erupted with Americans who are done with this nonsense.
The way these RINOs pour their hearts out for Haitians but not American citizens is disgraceful. https://t.co/jWblRsqOXF
This is the same John Kasich with a $20 million net worth who lives in a gated community outside of Columbus, Ohio where his mansion with its own lake has a giant wall around it and 24/7 armed security.
Man am I glad President Trump ended this version of the Republican Party. https://t.co/UfUOujLAzP
I loathe this kind of Republican even more than the communists. At least the communists are honest about destroying the West. Guys like John would destroy it if they could, all while pretending it’s not happening because they won’t live long enough to deal with the consequences. https://t.co/EkIbcMzpKU
Voted for Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Refused to welcome President Trump in Cleveland at the 2016 RNC convention Voted for US/China normalization act which gutted Ohio manufacturing and built China’s middle class Voted… https://t.co/1vBBIz13ia
American Liberals Silent as Hamas Crushes Anti-Hamas Protests
June 29, 2026
Hamas is determined to suppress Palestinian demonstrations calling for an end to the terrorist organization’s rule in Gaza. Photo courtesy of Flash90.
The “Free Palestine” movement has remained silent on the arrest, torture, and murder of anti-Hamas protesters in Palestine. The violence and repression committed by the Hamas terrorist organization against Palestinian civilians throw a wrinkle into its narrative blaming Israel and President Trump for all of the suffering in Gaza. The protests also dispel claims by the American left that Gazans want to be ruled by Hamas or that Hamas is the legitimate governing authority.
For the second time in little more than a year, Palestinians in Gaza took to the streets demanding an end to Hamas rule. According to the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, Hamas’s approval rating fell from 52 percent in December 2023 to 43 percent by May 2025. The demonstrations, organized as the “June 26 Peaceful Revolution,” reflected growing anger over nearly two decades of Hamas control, the devastation of the war, and allegations of corruption and repression.
The protests were organized across 18 locations throughout the Gaza Strip. Demonstrators called on Hamas to disarm and transfer civil administration to a transitional governing authority.
Hamas responded with a sweeping crackdown. Security forces arrested organizers, kidnapped suspected participants, threatened demonstrators, and used mosques to denounce the protests before many rallies could begin. Armed operatives arrested Gazans in the streets, seized mobile phones, restricted movement around displaced persons camps, and rounded up others at hospitals.
Although the crackdown prevented large-scale demonstrations in many areas, hundreds of Palestinians defied the threats and publicly called for Hamas’s removal.
In the days preceding the protests, Hamas launched what activist Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, a Gaza-born Palestinian now living in exile in the United States, described as an “industrial-scale campaign of terror, intimidation, interrogation, and blackmail” against thousands of Gazans who had planned to participate.
Hamas also provided itself religious cover for the crackdown. The Fatwa Committee of the Association of Palestinian Scholars issued a ruling declaring the demonstrations “a criminal movement,” accusing participants of assisting Israel and advancing objectives Israel had failed to achieve through military force. Participation could therefore be treated as collaboration with Israel, a crime punishable by death under Hamas rule.
On the day of the protests, Hamas police, intelligence units, and al-Qassam Brigade militias deployed throughout the Strip. Armed operatives were positioned near planned gathering points, civilian movement around displaced-person camps was restricted, and cellphones were confiscated from people identified with the protest calls. Observers reported that “The atmosphere on the ground was one of clear pressure.”
“Every attempt at public organization was met immediately by the presence of security forces.” Hamas supporters framed the measures differently, claiming they were intended “to protect public order and prevent chaos during wartime.”
Hamas used Gaza’s hospitals as detention and interrogation centers. Detentions were reported at four facilities: Al-Shifa, Nasser, Al-Ahli Arab, and Al-Aqsa Martyrs hospitals.
Alkhatib identified Al-Ahli Arab Hospital, also known as the Baptist Hospital, as a Hamas intelligence hub. According to him, Hamas security officials summoned people to the hospital, interrogated them, threatened them, and placed them under house arrest inside the facility.
Al-Qassam Brigades operatives, Hamas police, and internal security officers warned detainees that if they posted anything supporting the protests or assisted demonstrators, they would be “executed under revolutionary conditions” and treated as collaborators with Israel. They were told there would be no trial, no due process, and immediate execution.
Hamas warned journalists not to cover the protests. Its affiliated media outlets published footage of empty intersections and declared the “Failure of the June 26 Revolution.” Streets in Khan Younis, Al Qarara, and Al Nasr were described as eerily quiet.
On social media, Hamas-aligned accounts claimed the protest movement was orchestrated by IDF Arabic-language spokesman Lt. Col. Avichay Adraee. They portrayed the demonstrators as Israeli agents, the same collaboration accusation Hamas used to justify extrajudicial executions. Critics inside Gaza rejected the claim.
“There is a harsh reality on the ground,” one social media user wrote. “The attempt to silence every critical voice only deepens the crisis.”
Despite the crackdown, hundreds took to the streets carrying signs reading, “God willing, Hamas out,” “We are not pawns,” and “We want to live.”
The June 26 action was the second major wave of anti-Hamas unrest in little over a year. Between March and August 2025, protests erupted across Gaza demanding Hamas relinquish power and end the war with Israel. Hamas executed six Gazans and publicly flogged or kidnapped others who participated, with some remaining missing.
The fate of 22-year-old Uday Al Rabbay illustrated the cost of dissent. Kidnapped shortly after taking part in a protest, his body, covered in blood, was returned to his family’s doorstep days later as a warning against further demonstrations. The Committee to Protect Journalists reported that Hamas beat reporters and photographers and threatened their lives and families to suppress coverage.
The suppression is carried out by dedicated internal security units operating outside any legal process. A UN report found that Hamas’s Sahm Unit and Radaa Force killed at least 60 civilians in Gaza during 2024 and 2025.
During the 2017 and 2019 protest waves, Hamas security forces used violence, arrests, and intimidation to suppress demonstrations driven by Gaza’s economic conditions. During the current war, Hamas shifted to less visible methods. It carried out arrests and executions behind the scenes while avoiding open street confrontations, in part to reduce its exposure to Israeli strikes and limit international scrutiny.
Protest organizers appealed to governments, journalists, and human rights organizations to monitor events closely, warning that participants had already become targets of intimidation before the protests began.
“The right to peaceful assembly and political expression is a foundational civil liberty,” they wrote. “The population of Gaza is entitled to exercise this right without fear of violent reprisal.”
American liberals are unlikely to protest in favor of Hamas stepping down because the movement’s narrative is built around Israeli culpability and American support for Israel. Hamas’s removal disrupts that frame. The United States and Israel have both demanded that Hamas disarm and relinquish governance. Any liberal who echoes that demand is, in effect, agreeing with Israel and the Trump administration, a politically untenable position.
This is compounded by the left’s romanticization of Hamas as an anti-colonial resistance movement. Gazans demanding Hamas’s removal force an acknowledgment that Hamas is also an oppressor, undermining years of messaging.
Mainstream and left-leaning media have given minimal coverage to the anti-Hamas protests. As a result, most American liberals are unaware they are taking place. Where the protests have received attention, Hamas’s portrayal of the demonstrators as Israeli agents has been repeated in pro-Palestinian circles in the West, delegitimizing the movement before it could gain traction abroad.
Organizations such as Students for Justice in Palestine are ideologically aligned with Hamas’s political program. They cannot support calls for Hamas’s removal without fracturing their own coalitions. The result is that the people of Gaza demanding freedom from Hamas rule receive almost no solidarity from the Western left that claims to speak on their behalf.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Lawmakers Blast Trans Agenda as Gallup Poll Shows Support COLLAPSING During Pride Month – MLB Players Refuse to Comply
June 29, 2026
Credit: Matt Hrkac / Flickr/ wikimedia commons
While radical leftists wave rainbow flags and corporate America virtue-signals its way through another forced Pride Month, real America is saying ‘ENOUGH.’
A bombshell new Gallup Poll reveals the transgender movement – the most aggressive, reality-denying faction of the LGBTQ+ push – has hit a wall.
Moral acceptance of “changing one’s gender” has plunged to just 38%, down from 46% in 2021. Broader support for the agenda is sliding fast. The American people are waking up.
And nowhere is this backlash more visible than on the baseball diamond, where grown men are finally refusing to be bullied into celebrating biological males invading women’s sport, locker rooms, and – most outrageously – the bodies of confused children.
MLB Players Strike Back; First Amendment vs. Woke Compelled Speech.
This Pride Month, the mask came off. Players across MLB and the minors said “no” to rainbow jerseys and patches. The York Revolution flat-out forfeited a game because not enough players would wear the Pride-themed uniforms. San Francisco Giants pitchers wrote Bible verses on their caps – and MLB responded with warnings, sparking DOJ and EEOC investigations into religious discrimination. Sen Josh Hawley, R-MO, and others called it what it is: an assault on faith and free speech.
What does MLB think it’s doing penalizing players for their Christian faith?
These athletes aren’t “bigots.” They’re standing on biological truth and constitutional rights. The Texas Rangers, to their credit, skipped the nonsense entirely with a Faith and Freedom Night instead. The silent majority of fans cheering.
Rep. Rich McCormick, R-GA, specifically pointed to the trans community as the group that’s losing support. He wasted no time putting the trans community on the spot:
“I think that’s the part that is, that’s lost support because I think people realize it’s perverse to the point where you’re infringing on women when they can’t compete in good faith with other women, when they can’t go to the locker room and be around just women the way it was intended,” McCormick told TGP in an exclusive interview.
McCormick went even further by suggesting that the trans community is infringing on women’s rights to “enforce their own desires.”
“You have two groups of special interests. One of them is women who’ve been around forever and who have demanded their rights. We’ve fought for their rights. And the other is this fringe group that really has gone outside the boundaries of nature to infringe on another group.”
Rep. Tim Burchett, R-TN, went even harder: “They’re protected under the Constitution, and they just rub it in everyone’s face with these trans shows and these mentally ill men that are going, dressing up like women that are going into little girls restrooms and stuff, and competing in sports,” Burchett told TGP in an exclusive interview.
Rep. @timburchett calls transgender women “mentally ill men.”
He goes further to say that the trans community keeps “pushing the envelope” and that even “middle of the road people can’t stand it anymore.”
Burchett also believes that support for the trans community will only continue to decrease over time. “Because they’re gonna keep pushing and pushing to the point of being so obnoxious to even just middle-of-the-road people that they just can’t stand it anymore.”
That’s not hate. That’s common sense. The Real Scandal: Muttilating Kids and Erasing Women. The Transgender ideology’s greatest crime is targeting America’s children. Puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries – what President Trump rightfully called “chemical and surgical mutilation.” His executive orders in early 2025 cut off federal funding for these horrors against minors. Dozens of hospitals have since paused or stopped youth transitions under pressure. The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s ban. Over two dozens states have drawn the line.
Biological males – with XY chromosomes, male muscle mass, and male skeletal structure – continue to dominate women’s sports, stealing scholarships, records, and safety from actual females. Trump’s “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” order and the NCAA’s policy shift were long-overdue corrections to this madness.
Democrats and activists still defend this insanity. Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-NY, told TGP in an exclusive interview that he blamed “Donald Trump” and “far-right tadicalization.” Rep. Marc Veasey, D-TX, cried about money from “two white males that are gay” in an exclusive interview with TGP and even confirmed he stopped rooting for the Texas Rangers over a historical statue.
Sen. @JohnFetterman expresses his supoort for the LGBTQ community, but believes that MLB players should not be forced to wear any LGBTQ themed patches.
Sen. John Fetterman, to his credit, at least admitted players should have the choice – while proudly flying the rainbow flag outside his office. Fetterman then invited the TGP to check out the LGBTQ flag outside his office.
The Tide is turning, but democrats refuse to admit it.
Roger Stone wrote a piece this weekend noting that McCarthy was right.
Here is a segment from his post.
Joseph Raymond McCarthy was a United States Senator from Wisconsin who rose to national prominence in the early 1950s because he dared to confront a reality that much of the American establishment preferred to ignore. He believed communism was not merely a foreign threat but an internal one. McCarthy understood that America’s adversaries did not always arrive in military uniforms or foreign armies. Sometimes they arrived through institutions, ideas, influence networks, and political movements that slowly reshaped public opinion and government policy from within.
His fight took place during one of the most dangerous periods in modern history. Joseph Stalin controlled Eastern Europe behind the Iron Curtain. Mao Zedong had consolidated communist rule over China. The Soviet Union had successfully penetrated American institutions through espionage networks that reached into the highest levels of government. Communist parties, front organizations, propagandists, and fellow travelers operated throughout the Western world.
Stone Cold Truth with Roger Stone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
McCarthy did not act alone. The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and other congressional investigations emerged because elected officials from both parties viewed communist infiltration as a legitimate national security concern. Their purpose was straightforward. Identify foreign influence operations. Expose espionage networks. Investigate ideological subversion. Determine the extent to which hostile political movements had penetrated American institutions. The mythology that later emerged portrays these investigations as little more than hysteria. History tells a more complicated story.
The release of the Venona decrypts confirmed extensive Soviet espionage inside the United States government. Former communist courier Whittaker Chambers provided firsthand testimony and documentary evidence on his book “Witness”. Bella Dodd, once a prominent Communist Party organizer, later described deliberate efforts to infiltrate labor unions, educational institutions, and even religious organizations. What many dismissed as conspiracy theories often proved to have substantial factual foundations. In fact, she was quoted with stating, “When I was organizing for the Communist Party back in the 1930s, I helped place over a thousand communist men in Catholic seminaries”.
I speak with some personal knowledge of this history because I was fortunate enough to know Roy Cohn, Senator McCarthy’s chief counsel and closest lieutenant. Roy was my mentor and my friend. He was brilliant, fearless, relentless, and utterly unwilling to be intimidated by conventional wisdom. Roy believed subversive movements thrived on ambiguity. He demanded specificity. Who are you? What did you do? Where did you do it? When did you do it? Why should the American people trust you with influence and power? These simple questions often proved devastating because they forced witnesses to confront facts rather than hide behind slogans and abstractions. Roy understood that polite surrender is simply a slower form of defeat. He believed dangerous ideas should be exposed before they become entrenched. Whether one agreed with every tactic he employed is beside the point. He recognized that institutions rarely police themselves and that uncomfortable truths often require uncomfortable questions.
One of the most controversial figures McCarthy targeted was Owen Lattimore. Lattimore was a prominent writer and adviser for the State Department on Far Eastern affairs who exerted significant influence on policy discussions concerning China. McCarthy argued that Lattimore’s influence consistently benefited communist interests while undermining anti-communist allies. The establishment dismissed such concerns as reckless accusations. Yet the broader question remains relevant today. How much influence should unelected intellectuals, academics, and policy experts exercise over decisions that affect the fate of nations? Author M. Stanton Evans’ book “Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies” delves into Lattimore and the State Department quite extensively. It’s a book I recommend every American read and then read it again. If you’re one of those whose opinion of Senator McCarthy is negative, I promise you’ll be persuaded to change your thinking about McCarthy and HUAC upon reading M. Stanton Evans’ book.
The lessons of that era remain relevant because communist strategy has always depended more on influence than force. The objective was never simply military conquest. The objective was cultural and institutional transformation. Capture education. Capture entertainment. Capture journalism. Capture bureaucracy. Capture language itself. Convince citizens that traditional beliefs are outdated and that centralized authority is necessary for progress. This strategy has proven remarkably successful. Universities that once celebrated intellectual diversity increasingly enforce ideological conformity. Corporate America often embraces political agendas that would have been considered radical only a generation ago. Major media organizations frequently function as political actors rather than neutral observers. Hollywood continues to shape cultural narratives that often portray faith, patriotism, and traditional institutions as objects of suspicion rather than sources of strength.
Even religion has not been immune. Liberation Theology emerged in Latin America by blending Christian language with Marxist political theory. Its critics argued that it shifted Christianity’s focus away from salvation and toward political revolution. They contended that it transformed the Gospel into a vehicle for class struggle. Whether one accepts that critique or not, the tension between Christianity and Marxism remains obvious. One places God at the center of human life. The other places political power at the center.
Perhaps nowhere is the cultural battle more visible than in entertainment itself. Consider the two cinematic portrayals of the apparitions at Fatima. The 1952 Warner Brothers film “The Miracle of Our Lady of Fatima” explicitly and accurately referenced the Blessed Virgin Mary’s warning that Russia would spread its errors throughout the world. The film reflected the historical reality that the Fatima message emerged against the backdrop of the Bolshevik Revolution and the rise of international communism. By contrast, the 2020 film “Fatima” removed references to Russia and communism entirely. The historical warning remained, but the specific ideological context largely disappeared. Whether one views that omission as artistic choice or cultural revisionism, the contrast is striking. Remove the villain and the warning loses much of its force. Remove the historical context and future generations lose their understanding of why the warning mattered. This is how cultural memory is often transformed. Not through censorship alone but through omission, revision, and selective emphasis. .
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.