Jasmine Crockett Still Won’t Commit to Campaigning for James Talarico in Texas (VIDEO)
August 29, 2026
Screencap of Twitter/X video.
Jasmine Crockett was recently pressed on CNN about why she is not working hard to help James Talarico, who beat her in the Texas Democrat primary for Senate. She said that she is focusing on down ballot races.
There is no mystery here. Crockett feels like she got burned by her own party in the primary race and she did. Who can blame her for not wanting to help Talarico win?
It’s also fun to watch the media begin to panic about this. Some of them will blame her if Talarico loses.
During an interview with CNN’s Laura Coates, Crockett was asked about whether she plans to help Talarico win more voters.
“I will be campaigning down ballot,” the lawmaker answered. “I think that what matters most—because when we’re looking at a state like Texas, we’ve tried this where we’ve got one amazing candidate that’s running at the top of the ticket, Beto [O’Rourke], is a very good example of this, raising all the money, doing all the things, running around the entire state, but it’s not enough.”
Crockett indicated that her objective is to help Democrat candidates in other races that may not get as much attention because of Talarico’s candidacy.
“So for me, I don’t think that it should be a matter of there’s just one thing that is getting me to the polls,” Crockett continued.
I think that making sure that people that maybe are getting overshadowed because it seems like it’s only about one big race, I think amplifying them, making sure that I can raise their profiles and introducing them to people, that’ll give something more to voters to make them say, you know what, it may be raining outside, but I got to go get there because I got to go get there for this person and this person. Plus, I don’t like Trump.
Satanic Temple Band Films ‘Abortion Ritual’ in Hobby Lobby Bathroom for Music Video Attacking Justice Alito’s Mother
August 29, 2026
A band tied to The Satanic Temple has released a music video that shows a woman carrying out the group’s so-called “religious abortion ritual” inside a Hobby Lobby bathroom, then ends with an explicit attack on Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and his mother.
Satanic Planet, whose members include Satanic Temple co-founder Lucien Greaves, posted the video for the song “Sam Alito’s Mom” this week.
The clip opens by claiming that on Friday, March 13, 2026, a satanic abortion ritual was performed inside a Hobby Lobby restroom.
The disgusting video, which The Gateway Pundit has chosen not to embed, features store displays of Christian décor, including a “Jesus loves me, this I know” sign, before showing the ritual and later showing those same items engulfed in flames.
The band describes abortion as a “destruction ritual” and “protective rite” meant, in their words, to cast off guilt after abortion and to “empower the patient against those with theocratic religious convictions.”
It walks through the group’s scripted steps involving a mirror, the Temple’s tenets, an affirmation, and abortion medication.
“Immediately before taking the medication(s) to terminate your pregnancy, look at your reflection and take deep breaths,” it instructs. “After you have passed the embryo, return to your reflection. The religious abortion ritual is now complete.”
The clip ends with images of Supreme Court justices, vulgar lyrics laid over their faces, and a zoom on Alito.
Greaves has tied the song to The Satanic Temple’s campaign to expand abortion access through clinics it operates and through planned litigation over mailing abortion drugs.
The Satanic Temple is staunchly pro-abortion, taking on legal battles in recent years against states’ abortion laws in the wake of Roe v Wade being overturned. The group operates four telehealth abortion facilities across the country, with its latest opening in Maine on Trump’s birthday. The latest clinic is being called “President’s Yuge Most Beautiful Tremendous Satanic Abortion Clinic.”
Hobby Lobby is a family-owned arts-and-crafts chain run by the Green family, who are evangelical Christians. They provide employee health insurance but objected to part of the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate, and the battle went all the way to the Supreme Court.
The mandate required most employer plans to cover all FDA-approved contraceptives at no cost to the employee.
The Greens objected to covering four methods of contraception that they believed could prevent a fertilized egg from implanting, which is contrary to their faith that life begins at conception. Refusing to comply would have exposed the company to large daily fines.
They sued under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), a federal statute that says the government may not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion unless it is furthering a compelling interest by the least restrictive means.
The legal fight was whether a for-profit corporation could even claim RFRA protection. The government argued corporations do not exercise religion. T
The Supreme Court disagreed for closely held companies, finding that RFRA’s definition of “person” includes corporations, and family owners use those companies to live out their beliefs.
UK “Don’t R-pe” Booklet for Asylum Seekers Intended to Stop Grooming Gangs and Prevent Crimes Against Women and Children
August 29, 2026
The only reason migrants were committing sex crimes was that they didn’t know it was illegal. This pamphlet will straighten that out. Courtesy of the British Home Office.
They claim that migrants are not disproportionately responsible for sex crimes in Britain, but just in case, the government is publishing a new booklet telling them not to rape anyone or forcibly marry a child.
Unbelievably, some rights groups have called the booklet racist and demanded that it be withdrawn.
Liberals have claimed that the UK’s Pakistani grooming gangs were a myth designed by the right to vilify migrants.
However, the existence of these gangs, as well as incidents of rape and child marriage linked to migrants from Muslim countries, has been well documented.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told Parliament in January 2025 that multiple major grooming-gang investigations “involved Pakistani heritage gangs.”
The subsequent National Audit report, led by Baroness Louise Casey and published in June 2025, found that Pakistanis were disproportionately represented among suspects in local datasets.
The government has since ordered mandatory recording of ethnicity and nationality in child sexual exploitation cases, and a full statutory inquiry chaired by Baroness Anne Longfield began work on April 13, 2026.
However, even when British jurisdictions record perpetrators’ national origins, many use the terms “Asian” or “South Asian,” obscuring the fact that the perpetrators are Pakistani.
Many also record perpetrators by citizenship rather than ethnicity, meaning Pakistanis or other Muslims born in the UK who commit these crimes are counted as British in official statistics.
This is similar to how the U.S. media consistently referred to Kilmar Abrego Garcia as a “Maryland man” who was inexplicably and viciously deported to El Salvador, rather than as an El Salvadoran citizen who was in the United States illegally, had a final order of deportation, and was deported to his country of citizenship.
Recent conviction records in the UK support claims that grooming gangs exist and are linked to migrants.
In Kirklees, West Yorkshire, 20 men, predominantly Pakistani, were sentenced to a combined 277 years after a trial that concluded in September 2024. They were convicted of raping and drugging girls as young as 12.
In the landmark 2012 Rochdale case, eight of the nine convicted gang members were of Pakistani origin.
At least three, Adil Khan, Qari Abdul Rauf, and Abdul Aziz, were Pakistan-born migrants who had acquired British citizenship through naturalization.
All three were later stripped of that citizenship and ordered deported, though prolonged legal appeals have kept them in the UK.
The broader scandal was also marked by reporting restrictions and delayed disclosure.
Ringleader Shabir Ahmed, who was also born in Pakistan, remains in Britain following his release from prison because Pakistan has so far refused to accept him.
This prompted the UK government to introduce legislation in 2026 specifically intended to enable his removal.
In a more recent Rochdale investigation, seven men were sentenced in October 2025 to terms ranging from 12 to 35 years for systematically abusing two 13-year-old girls between 2001 and 2006.
More than 75 men have been charged and 53 convicted in the Rochdale investigation since it began in 2010. A retrial of six additional defendants opened in Manchester in January 2026.
In a separate case, eight men were sentenced across two trials in 2023 and 2024 for a series of rapes. Two defendants were sentenced in absentia and remain at large.
Individual sexual-offense cases involving asylum seekers have also become a recurring feature of UK crime reporting since 2023.
In Epping, Essex, Ethiopian asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu was convicted in 2025 of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl and a woman days after arriving in the UK by small boat; he received the maximum 12-month sentence a magistrates’ court can impose, was then mistakenly released early, and triggered a manhunt that Prime Minister Keir Starmer called “totally unacceptable.”
In London, an Egyptian asylum seeker who entered the UK illegally in 2023 was convicted of raping a woman in Hyde Park, with the sentencing judge noting he showed no belief that he had done anything wrong.
A failed Egyptian asylum seeker, Moustafa Elbohy, was convicted of raping a woman twice near Charing Cross station, and Pakistani national Kamran Khan was charged with raping and sexually assaulting an eight-year-old girl on two occasions between September 2024 and July 2025.
An analysis of Ministry of Justice data drawn from the Police National Computer by the Centre for Migration Control found that convictions of foreign nationals for sexual offences rose by 62 percent between 2021 and 2024, from 687 to 1,114.
By percentage increase, the five nationalities with the sharpest rises were Indian, up 257 percent; Nigerian, up 166 percent; Iraqi, up 160 percent; Sudanese, up 117 percent; and Afghan, up 115 percent.
Pakistani and Bangladeshi nationals, the groups most associated with earlier grooming-gang cases, ranked eleventh and sixth, respectively.
A related Telegraph headline, citing data from the same think tank, claimed that foreign nationals accounted for a “quarter” of all UK sex crimes. The headline was the subject of an upheld complaint to the press regulator IPSO.
The regulator found that the underlying data definitively showed only that foreign nationals accounted for 15 percent of convictions between 2021 and 2023.
The nationality of offenders was unknown in an additional 8 percent of cases, which the paper assumed involved foreign nationals to reach the higher figure.
IPSO ruled that the headline was “significantly misleading” and required a correction, after which the paper changed the wording to “up to a quarter.”
On child and forced marriage, the UK raised the legal marriage age to 18 in England and Wales under the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) Act of 2022, closing a loophole that had allowed 16- and 17-year-olds to marry with parental consent.
Despite the change, the government’s own Forced Marriage Unit statistics for 2025 recorded 406 cases requiring tailored assistance, a 69 percent increase from 2024. Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, and Afghanistan were consistently listed as the leading focus countries.
The data also show a rising share of cases with no overseas element, meaning the marriage was arranged entirely within the UK. The number increased from eight cases, or 3 percent, in 2022 to 15 cases, or 6 percent, in 2024.
Now that there’s a pamphlet, migrants can’t claim they didn’t know child abuse was illegal. Courtesy of the British Home Office.
It is against this backdrop of a well-documented pattern of migrant-linked sex crimes that the Home Office published a nine-page booklet for asylum seekers titled “Understanding Behaviours and Expectations in the UK.”
The booklet was released on August 19, 2026, and covers gender equality, domestic abuse, sex and consent, and respect in public.
On consent, it states that both parties must agree to any sexual act, that a sleeping, intoxicated, or unresponsive person cannot consent, and that consent can be withdrawn at any time, including during marriage.
It defines nonconsensual sex plainly as rape, a serious crime that can lead to imprisonment, loss of asylum support and accommodation, and damage to an asylum claim.
The guide also states that anyone under 16 cannot legally consent to sexual activity and identifies child abuse and female genital mutilation as serious crimes.
A section on public conduct warns against making sexual comments, whistling, making kissing sounds, following people, or blocking their path.
Education Secretary Lucy Powell defended the booklet’s distribution, telling LBC that some migrants come from “different cultures” and that new arrivals must understand the expectations and the consequences of breaking the law. Prime Minister Andy Burnham also backed its release.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp countered that the need for such a document shows that the government has lost control of the border.
Separately, a coalition of women’s rights and migrant-support organizations, including the Latin American Women’s Rights Service, the End Violence Against Women Coalition, and Southall Black Sisters, issued a joint statement calling the guide harmful.
The groups argued that it would fuel suspicion and division rather than protect women and urged the Home Office to withdraw and replace it with guidance developed in consultation with specialist services.
This is not the Home Office’s first such publication. For years, asylum seekers arriving in the UK have been issued a Home Office guide to rights and expectations in the UK. It covers British culture, values, and law, along with health, welfare, and safety information. It was distributed with a companion guide to living in initial accommodation, which explains housing and support services.
Based on their published contents, neither earlier guide addressed consent, rape, or sexual harassment in the direct terms used in the 2026 booklet.
Their scope was largely administrative, covering accommodation providers and introducing asylum seekers to British institutions rather than providing explicit instruction on sexual conduct or laws concerning gender-based violence.
Apparently, the UK government believes that publishing this booklet and the accompanying posters will help keep British women and children safe. Finally!
Politicians who care enough about the people to take a stand. Now, they should publish posters and booklets about other forms of crimes and bring the crime rate down to zero.
Stephen Miller Exposes Shocking Cost of Illegal Asylum Fraud — Reveal Shows ONE Fake Claim Costs Same as Cancer Treatment for American Child
August 29, 2026
This should make every single American patriot’s blood boil.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller dropped a truth bomb during on Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle, that lays bare the absolute corruption of the open-borders apparatus.
While millions of working-class American families struggle to afford basic medical care for their sick children, billions of tax dollars are being funneled into processing and housing illegal aliens filing fraudulent asylum claims.
According to Miller, the financial burden placed on taxpayers to handle just ONE SINGLE FAKE ASYLUM CLAIM equals the total cost of providing life-saving cancer treatment to an American child.
“Did you know, Laura, the cost of adjudicating even one fake asylum claim is the same cost as providing free cancer treatment to one American citizen with pediatric cancer?
“Every single fraud they abet, we could provide free cancer care to one American citizen.”
WATCH:
HOLY CRAP! Stephen Miller just revealed ONE SINGLE FAKE ASYLUM CLAIM costs the SAME amount as a cancer treatment for an American child
This should ENRAGE EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN.@StephenM: “EVERY SINGLE FRAUD [Democrats] abet, we could provide FREE CANCER CARE to one American… pic.twitter.com/X3nfTBbrOX
Miller said the same thing during a recent press conference:
“For the cost of processing one fraudulent asylum claim, you could give any child in America free cancer treatment…What would we rather do, give American children free cancer treatment, or endlessly tolerate abusive and frivolous and meritless asylum claims?”
WATCH:
Stephen Miller: “For the cost of processing one fraudulent asylum claim, you could give any child in America free cancer treatment…What would we rather do, give American children free cancer treatment, or endlessly tolerate abusive and frivolous and meritless asylum claims?” pic.twitter.com/oCigaGRKi3
As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, Miller warned that Democrats had created a system that redirected hundreds of billions—and potentially trillions—of taxpayer dollars toward migrants living in the United States.
“What we found since President Trump came into office is that the Democrats have set up a system to funnel hundreds of billions and ultimately trillions of dollars to migrants that are in our country,” Miller said at the time.
The Gateway Pundit also reported in 2022 on allegations that the Biden administration was operating a “mass asylum fraud rubber-stamp operation” at the southern border.
President Trump’s administration has since moved to streamline the asylum process and eliminate duplicative reviews. Under a rule announced in July, USCIS may send certain asylum applications directly to immigration court instead of conducting a separate agency interview first, according to Fox News.
Democrats spent years insisting that the border crisis had no cost and that Americans had a moral obligation to finance their disastrous immigration experiment.
Lindsay Clancy Cult Feminist LOSES IT On Live TV
August 29, 2026
Democrat strategist and former Obama adviser Laurie Watkins erupted in a heated televised debate over the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, ultimately walking off set after a clash with commentator Thomas Corbett-Dillon that went viral across social media platforms. During the segment, Watkins emotionally claimed that while “nobody’s defending what she did,” people could still “have empathy for what she went through,” framing public support for Clancy as concern for a mother in severe mental crisis.
Corbett-Dillon, a political commentator and former adviser to Boris Johnson, blasted the women rallying outside the courthouse in pink, calling them “man-hating women” who “think the husband did it” and declaring “they’re crazy, they’ve lost their minds.” He went further, saying “they say that Lindsay was in psychosis, I think these women are suffering from psychosis,” and portraying Clancy as “an incredibly privileged woman, incredibly wealthy” who “had a nanny” and “could not have gotten more help from the system than she already received.”
As Corbett-Dillon doubled down, Watkins snapped, telling him “what you just said was absolutely disgusting” and “you should be ashamed of yourself,” before adding “you clearly don’t care, so pipe down” in a moment that commentators later described as a meltdown. The exchange ended when Watkins rose and left the set, declaring “I’ve had it with you!” accusing him of misogyny as the debate abruptly collapsed into on‑air chaos.
Corbett-Dillon then turned to viewers, warning “men watching this, if you have a woman sitting next to you on the sofa who is defending this murderer, you’ve got to think deeply about this,” casting the controversy as a broader cultural battle over gender and justice.
At the center of their dispute is the case of Lindsay Clancy, a 36‑year‑old Massachusetts mother who admits strangling her three children — Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months — with exercise or fitness bands at the family’s Duxbury home on January 24, 2023, before cutting herself and jumping from a second‑story window, leaving her paralyzed.
Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first‑degree murder and is pursuing an insanity defense, with her lawyers arguing she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and extreme mental illness, while prosecutors contend she acted “intentionally, rationally and swiftly,” sending her husband out for errands to create time to kill the children and fully understanding that her actions were wrong.
After weeks of testimony from dozens of witnesses, closing arguments have concluded and a jury is now deliberating over whether Clancy is criminally responsible — weighing first‑degree murder, lesser charges such as manslaughter, or a verdict that would commit her to a psychiatric hospital.
Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!
New Documents Confirm Fauci’s NIAID Provided Cover for CIA Bioterrorism Research — CIA Helped Obtain the Viruses and Controlled What Data Could Be Shared
August 29, 2026
Dr. Fauci swears in at Senate Committee Hearing on his numerous lies to the American public on his role in the COVID crisis.
As The Gateway Pundit has reported for years, Fauci was never merely a public-health doctor.
After the anthrax attacks, Vice President Dick Cheney and the Bush administration remade NIAID into the civilian hub of U.S. biodefense.
Billions poured in. High-containment labs proliferated. Dual-use research on the most dangerous pathogens exploded, work that Fauci later funneled, through EcoHealth Alliance, to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The new documents fill in how early that partnership with the intelligence community really was.
According to Sen. Rand Paul:
“JUST RELEASED: The official hearing record of Anthony Fauci’s “testimony” before my Committee—which ultimately led the Committee to hold him in contempt. Beginning on page 96: previously unreleased documents I entered into the permanent congressional record, like this one showing CIA funds were transferred to Fauci’s NIAID.”
JUST RELEASED: The official hearing record of Anthony Fauci’s “testimony” before my Committee—which ultimately led the Committee to hold him in contempt.
Beginning on page 96: previously unreleased documents I entered into the permanent congressional record, like this one… pic.twitter.com/zyqwPKY0Uo
An undated interagency agreement obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation confirms that Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases worked directly with the CIA on sensitive research involving viruses and biological threats.
The eight-page agreement shows that the CIA’s Biological Technology Center initiated a collaboration with NIAID involving “forensic microbiology” research for the intelligence community.
Fauci served as director of NIAID from 1984 until 2022.
According to the documents, the CIA planned to leverage existing civilian research programs at NIH to support intelligence-related biological research.
Unclassified NIH virus research would be used to “augment and complement” the CIA’s own research and development.
The CIA would even help Fauci’s agency obtain the pathogens needed for the research.
The arrangement also gave the spy agency control over what could be released publicly.
Although the resulting research was reportedly considered sensitive rather than classified, NIAID could not share the data without first receiving permission from the CIA.
In other words, Fauci’s supposedly civilian public-health institute was working alongside America’s premier spy agency on research involving dangerous biological agents, with the CIA controlling access to the findings.
The project reportedly sought to expand the government’s ability to conduct comparative forensic analyses of complete viruses rather than examining only individual genes.
This is not ancient history. It is the origin story of the same apparatus that later funded bat-coronavirus experiments in Wuhan, steered the intelligence community away from the lab-leak hypothesis, and produced the “Proximal Origin” paper that media and public-health officials treated as gospel.
Documents released this year by Sen. Rand Paul and then-DNI Tulsi Gabbard showed Fauci briefing CIA officials, feeding the IC a hand-picked list of NIAID-funded scientists, and denying under oath that he had discussed viral research with intelligence agencies.
The new CIA–NIAID agreement shows the relationship was baked in from the start.
A November 2003 CIA memo titled “The Darker Bioweapons Future” describes the rationale for virologists becoming spies.
The National Academy told the CIA that in order to detect biological weapons, intel agencies needed more assets in labs.
The Gateway Pundit has documented the pattern: Fauci denied funding gain-of-function work in Wuhan. NIH later conceded EcoHealth violated grant terms. Fauci’s senior adviser David Morens deleted records and coordinated with Peter Daszak.
Biden issued a preemptive pardon covering Fauci back to 2014, the same year the key EcoHealth grant began. Now we see NIAID was already serving as cover and complement for CIA bioterror research two decades earlier.
The Biological Weapons Convention bans development of biological weapons. “Characterization” and “forensic” work on complete viruses, with CIA control of the data and CIA help acquiring the agents, is exactly the gray zone critics warned about when Cheney parked the program at Fauci’s institute.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
HOLY CRAP! Stephen Miller just revealed ONE SINGLE FAKE ASYLUM CLAIM costs the SAME amount as a cancer treatment for an American child
