Video circulating online reportedly shows Colorado Democrat Christian Schilder restrained in the back of a police transport vehicle following his arrest in Texas, an incident that occurred while he was actively campaigning for the state legislature.

Schilder is the Democratic candidate challenging Republican State Rep. Brandi Bradley in Colorado House District 39. The general election is scheduled for November 3, 2026.

Official Colorado campaign records show Schilder filed his candidate affidavit in November 2025 and continues to maintain an active campaign.

According to a published Brazos County booking record, Schilder was booked on May 8, 2026, on reported charges of:

• Public intoxication, first offense
• Resisting arrest, search, or transport

The record lists bonds of $300 and $6,000, respectively. Brazos County provides an official online jail-record search portal for public records.

Douglas County Campaign Watch published a graphic that it said reproduced an account from arresting Officer Jonathan Wynn.

According to the officer narrative presented by the organization, Schilder allegedly refused to walk to the patrol vehicle and had to be physically carried by three officers.

Once inside the vehicle, Schilder allegedly began kicking the rear door and attempted to kick another arrested person, according to the attributed police account.

Officers reportedly removed Schilder from the vehicle and placed him in a WRAP restraint system to prevent him from injuring himself or others before transporting him to jail.

The narrative stated that Schilder was subsequently charged with resisting transport.

The graphic reads:

“When we attempted to place him in a patrol car he would not walk and had to be physically carried to the patrol car.”

Douglas County Campaign Watch blasted Schilder after circulating footage that it said showed the Democrat restrained inside a police vehicle.

“This is unacceptable,” the organization said in a Facebook post, arguing that candidates for public office should be held to a higher standard.

“This isn’t an old mistake from years ago,” the group continued. “This happened during the campaign he is running right now.”

The organization called on Schilder to withdraw from the HD39 contest, adding: “The campaign photo may be polished. The video tells a very different story.”

WATCH:

This is who Colorado Democrats have running against @bradleyforco ! Just wow!

From Douglas County Campaign Watch:

“This is unacceptable.

“Democrat Christian Schilder is asking voters to elect him to the Colorado House while video from the middle of his campaign shows him… pic.twitter.com/jeSGGC6gf6

— FreeStateColorado (@FreeStateColor1) August 28, 2026

Schilder has publicly addressed the incident. In an August 6 campaign post, he acknowledged being arrested for public intoxication and said he accepted responsibility for that conduct.

His campaign website presents Schilder as a civil engineer and “problem solver” focused on housing affordability, infrastructure, and transportation. It also declares that voters want honest representatives who will “take responsibility.”

The newly circulated police footage is now placing that campaign message under intensified scrutiny.

Schilder will face Bradley, the Republican incumbent, in November. Public election listings identify both candidates as their parties’ nominees for the HD39 general election.

The post JUST WOW: This Is Who Colorado Democrats Are Running Against Conservative Rep. Brandi Bradley — Arrested Mid-Campaign, Hogtied in a Police Van appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A Biden-appointed federal judge in California just handed the campus intifada another gift.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Noël Wise, a Joe Biden leftover, ruled that the Trump administration violated the First Amendment when it used national-security and foreign-policy authority to revoke the legal status of foreign students who spent the last two years turning American campuses into open-air Hamas rallies.

Wise, sitting in the Northern District of California, sided with The Stanford Daily and two unnamed international student journalists. They claimed Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visa revocations “chilled” their speech. The judge agreed.

In a 90-page opinion she declared that the Immigration and Nationality Act provisions Rubio used, the same tools Congress wrote to keep out people whose presence harms U.S. foreign policy, are unconstitutional as applied to protected speech.

The Gateway Pundit has reported for two years on what these “views” actually looked like.

After Hamas butchered 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023, foreign students and their faculty handlers erected encampments, seized buildings, blocked Jewish students from class, and chanted “from the river to the sea.”

At Columbia, protest leaders praised “violent resistance” and the October 7 massacre.

Masked activists stormed an Israeli history class and handed out flyers showing a boot crushing a Star of David and the words “Burn Zionism to the ground.” Jewish students were told they were not welcome. Administrators folded.

President Trump said it plainly after taking office: resident aliens who joined the “pro-jihadist protests” would be found and deported.

Secretary Rubio said the same thing. A visa is a privilege, not a constitutional entitlement to run a political operation against U.S. foreign policy.

Rubio personally signed off on cases including Columbia’s Mahmoud Khalil, a green-card holder who helped lead Columbia University Apartheid Divest, and Tufts doctoral student Rümeysa Öztürk, whose visa was pulled after she co-authored an op-ed.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that ICE arrested Öztürk after she co-authored a pro-Palestinian newspaper op-ed. Öztürk later left the United States for Turkey after a prolonged deportation battle.

The Gateway Pundit also extensively covered the government’s battle to remove Khalil, including an earlier ruling by an Obama-appointed judge that blocked his immediate deportation.

In April, the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a final removal order against Khalil after rejecting his attempt to dismiss the deportation case.

The administration’s position has been consistent: if we had known what you intended to do here, you would never have gotten the visa.

Judge Wise called that a “campaign of speech-chilling retribution.”

Noël Wise is not a neutral umpire. She is a former Alameda County Superior Court judge, appointed to the federal bench by Biden in the lame-duck window.

In a 2020 Atlantic essay she complained that President Trump’s judicial appointees were “overwhelmingly white and male” and “don’t look like America.”

Republicans flagged the article at her confirmation. Democrats rammed her through anyway.

Now she lectures the elected government of the United States that “you can simultaneously hate the content of a person’s speech and love the country that cherishes the freedom to allow it.”

The post Crazed Biden-Appointed California Judge Rules Trump Admin Can’t Yank Visas From Foreign Students Who Cheer Hamas and Terrorize Jewish Classmates appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Two little boys are dead. Their mother will not face prison for killing them.

A Bronx mother who repeatedly stabbed her 3-year-old and 11-month-old sons and submerged their bodies in a bathtub at a taxpayer-funded family shelter has been found not criminally responsible.

Dimone Fleming, now 26, will not go to prison. Judge Audrey Stone accepted the insanity plea Monday in Bronx Criminal Court, according to The New York Times.

Prosecutors and the defense agreed she was in a state of psychosis when she killed the children on November 26, 2022. She could be held in a psychiatric facility for months or years, if doctors still consider her a danger.

This is New York City justice in 2026.

Fleming was originally charged with first-degree murder.

According to court records cited by the Times, Fleming stabbed the boys multiple times, placed them in the bathtub, covered them with clothing and a sheet, left the faucet running, and left a stove burning inside the apartment.

A shelter employee called 911 after water and smoke began pouring from the apartment.

Responding officers reportedly found Fleming partially naked, behaving irrationally, and holding a children’s book upside down. Police took her to a hospital for a psychiatric evaluation but did not initially discover the boys’ bodies after being told that the children were with their father.

Fleming’s then-boyfriend, Columbus Canada, later entered the apartment and discovered both children unresponsive in the bathtub. Neighbors recalled hearing the distraught father screaming for help while carrying the boys into the hallway.

Both children were rushed to a hospital and pronounced dead.

Fleming allegedly made bizarre statements about the devil following the killings, according to ABC7 New York’s reporting at the time.

Dr. Eric Goldsmith, a psychiatrist who evaluated Fleming at the prosecution’s request, concluded that she was “grossly psychotic and out of touch with reality.”

Goldsmith reported that Fleming was hallucinating, believed the world was ending, and thought that a spirit had entered her body.

Doctors hired by the defense reached a similar conclusion, claiming Fleming believed she needed to protect or “cleanse” her children.

Before the killings, Fleming had reportedly received treatment for anxiety and depression at a Queens hospital. She was diagnosed with major depressive disorder and prescribed psychiatric medication but did not take it as directed. She was also reportedly using marijuana daily, which doctors said worsened her symptoms.

Unlike prosecutors in the nationally watched Lindsay Clancy case, Bronx prosecutors did not challenge the insanity defense.

“Prosecuting mothers does not and cannot prevent these crimes from happening, but public discourse might,” Bronx Assistant District Attorney Tiffany Wichman reportedly told the court.

Fleming’s attorney praised prosecutors for agreeing to resolve the case without a murder trial.

The case received far less national attention than the Lindsay Clancy trial in Massachusetts, where a jury has been deliberating a similar postpartum-psychosis defense in the strangling deaths of three children.

In the Bronx, it was handled quietly. Fleming is due back in court September 18 for further evaluation. She is not walking free today. She is also not in a prison cell.

The post NO PRISON: New York Mother Found Not Criminally Responsible After Stabbing Her Two Little Boys and Submerging Them in Bathtub — Judge Accepts “Postpartum Psychosis” Defense appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

President Trump Was Right – Antifa Is a Threat to the Security of America.

President Trump pointed out to his opponents, Biden and Wallace, in a 2020 debate, that Antifa was a danger to America.

Flashback to the 2020 Presidential debate, when Biden said that Antifa was “an idea not an organization”.

Why did Biden and the Dems/MSM spend all these years denying the existence of Antifa? Because they are running cover for their “Brownshirts”.

They are all on the same team, and their mission is to conquer the United States from within. The Dems, the MSM, Antifa, foreign Islamic terrorist organizations, the IRGC/Mullahs, etc., all of them are cogs of the same machine, the transnational criminal organization known as the “Deep State”.

I don’t care if you call it an insurrection, color revolution, regime-change operation, coup, treasonous conspiracy, or something else. All I know, is that the US MIL swore to protect the Constitution from all threats, foreign AND DOMESTIC, and this situation must be rectified.

The Military is the only way, and the only way for the US MIL to legally engage/assist in law enforcement on US soil, is via the Insurrection Act.

Flashback to the 2020 Presidential debate, when Biden said that Antifa was “an idea not an organization”.

Why did Biden and the Dems/MSM spend all these years denying the existence of Antifa? Because they are running cover for their “Brownshirts”.

They are all on the same team,… pic.twitter.com/PVx8MHtWzV

— Clandestine (@WarClandestine) August 28, 2026

President Trump was right.  (We all know former FBI Director Chris Wray was a Deep State seditious criminal.)  FOX reported this week.

Websites tied to Portland’s Rose City Antifa and the militant abortion-rights group Jane’s Revenge began going dark in the days after the State Department designated their Italy-based technology provider a global terrorist entity.

Fox News Digital first reported this week that the State Department had designated Autistici/Inventati, known as the A/I Collective, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist over its alleged support for violent far-left networks.

“Today’s news demonstrates the extent to which the A/I Collective was the digital infrastructure of the global Antifa terror network,” a State Department official told Fox News Digital.

“Just one day after the extremist collective was designated as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, an untold number of servers and websites — used by far-left extremists to plot violent attacks, target federal agents, and conceal their crimes from law enforcement — have been shut down,” the official said.

Among them was Rose City Counter-Info, a Portland-based website that the State Department says Rose City Antifa used to publish personal information about Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel and organize violent activity against federal agents.

The State Department said the group used the site to distribute an online flyer urging supporters to use laser pointers against Customs and Border Protection helicopters. Federal records show one man later pleaded guilty to aiming a laser at a CBP helicopter, forcing the aircraft to abort a planned landing.

Of course, President Trump was right.  America is under attack.

The post President Trump Was Right – Antifa Is a Threat to the Security of America. appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The prosecution shrink who told a Massachusetts jury that Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for strangling her three children is now out of a job.

Dr. Avram Mack, the prosecution psychiatrist who became embroiled in a fiery courtroom clash with defense attorney Kevin Reddington, is no longer employed by Nemours Children’s Health in Delaware.

Mack resigned Monday, the same day he completed his explosive testimony in the closely watched case, according to the New York Post.

“Dr. Avram Mack is no longer employed by Nemours Children’s Health,” the hospital system told the news outlet Friday.

Nemours refused to provide any further explanation, claiming that “employment decisions are confidential.”

The timing immediately raised eyebrows, although the hospital has not publicly connected Mack’s departure to his testimony.

Mack was called as a prosecution rebuttal witness after evaluating Clancy twice in April 2026, more than three years after she strangled her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and eight-month-old Callan, with exercise bands inside the basement of the family’s Duxbury, Massachusetts, home.

Clancy’s attorneys do not dispute that she killed the children. Instead, they argue that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible for her actions.

Mack acknowledged that Clancy was in “a serious psychiatric state” and “was suffering” when she killed the children on January 24, 2023.

He also testified he found no psychotic features in her records and that she retained the capacity to know the killings were wrong.

He diagnosed her as suffering from a major depressive episode rather than postpartum psychosis.

He told jurors she said “Go to God” as she strangled each child. He said that was not proof she was gone. It was proof she understood they were innocent.

Mack concluded that Clancy should be held criminally responsible.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington repeatedly challenged Mack’s qualifications, his experience treating adults, his understanding of postpartum psychiatric disorders, and his conclusions about Clancy’s mental state.

The questioning became especially tense when Mack appeared to smile while discussing psychological testing.

“What are you smiling for?” Reddington snapped.

“This is not funny, sir.”

The exchange became so contentious that Judge William Sullivan repeatedly intervened and instructed Mack to listen carefully and answer the questions being asked.

“Doctor, please,” Sullivan told him. “Listen to the question, and just answer the question, as asked.”

Mack’s testimony directly contradicted defense expert Dr. Phillip Resnick, who concluded that Clancy was experiencing postpartum psychosis, delusions, and command hallucinations when she killed the children.

Mack testified that Clancy told him she heard a loud male voice ordering her to kill the children so that she could then kill herself. According to Mack, Clancy remembered strangling the children and telling them to “go to God.”

Despite that account, Mack maintained that severe mental illness, or even psychosis, does not automatically prevent someone from understanding the difference between right and wrong.

During closing arguments, Plymouth County Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague reminded jurors of the prosecution’s case that Clancy deliberately separated the children and killed them one by one.

“She knew that he might struggle, and so it made sense rationally to remove him and separate him first and kill him first,” Sprague said of three-year-old Dawson.

One female juror was reportedly brought to tears during the prosecution’s closing argument.

The jury ended its second day of deliberations Friday without reaching a verdict and is scheduled to return Monday.

Clancy, 36, faces three counts of first-degree murder and could spend the rest of her life in prison if convicted. If found not guilty by reason of insanity, she could be committed to a psychiatric facility until authorities determine she no longer poses a danger.

The post Prosecution Psychiatrist Who Smirked During Fiery Exchange with Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Resigns from Children’s Hospital appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Democrats are seemingly unwilling or unable to let go of the trans issue, no matter how poorly it polls with the general public. During the 2024 election, Trump successfully tied the issue to Kamala Harris and all analysis following the race showed that this hurt Harris, badly.

So why do Democrats cling to this issue? Why do they even repeatedly show support for the transitioning of kids, a topic that has become absolutely toxic with voters?

According to Democrat pollster Doug Schoen, every time the Democrats try to get away from this, their radical base, particularly the DSA types, drag them back to it.

Schoen writes at FOX News:

The most formidable challenges facing establishment Democrats in November’s midterms are the success of far-left, socialist, or progressive candidates in primary elections and mainstream Democrats’ surrender to that wing of the party.

Alongside advocating for an agenda that is radical in its drive to reshape America – and is broadly unpopular – the DSA’s influence has left Democrats on the wrong side of an issue that the party has been hobbled by in the past: transgender policies.

Simply put, the DSA’s strong opposition to legislation banning biological males from competing in women’s sports has come to define where the national Democratic Party stands, much to its detriment.

And while this problem did not suddenly become an issue – Democrats had been trending this way for years before the 2024 election – it is only getting worse and will continue to do so…

Make no mistake, Democrats are on the wrong side of the transgender debate given public opinion.

According to Gallup’s May 2025 survey, roughly 7 in 10 (69%) Americans – including 72% of independents and a plurality of Democrats – believe transgender athletes should only be allowed to play on sports teams that match their gender at birth.

This issue will continue to dog Democrats for as long as they push it.

Only when they have lost enough races because of it, will they begin to see the light.

Until then, the public must keep reminding them how out of step they are with the majority.

The post Democrat Pollster Doug Schoen Explains Why Democrats Just Can’t Let Go of the Trans Issue appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.