BREAKING: Trump Calls on Biden-Appointed Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to Resign After Pulte Sends Criminal Referral to DOJ for Mortgage Fraud
August 20, 2025
President Trump called on Biden-appointed Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to resign on Wednesday after Bill Pulte criminally referred her to the Justice Department for mortgage fraud.
According to Pulte’s criminal referral, Lisa Cook committed mortgage fraud by lying on her mortgage application and falsified bank statements when she designated her out of state Atlanta condo as her “primary residence” – just two weeks after taking a loan on her Michigan home where she also claimed “primary residence.”
By claiming “primary residence” on her out of state condo, Lisa Cook received more favorable loan terms and a lower interest rate.
On June 18, 2021, Ms. Cook acquired a loan on a property in Ann Arbor, Michigan. On the mortgage agreement, Cook represented to “use the Property as Borrower’s principal residence within 60 days after the execution of her agreement.
On July 2, 2021, just two weeks later, Lisa Cook also purchased a condo in Atlanta and entered a 30-year mortgage agreement and affirmed the property would serve as her primary residence within 60 days of the execution of the mortgage and would serve as her primary residence for a full year.
This is textbook occupancy fraud.
U.S. Federal Housing FHFA, alleges in a Criminal Referral to the Department of Justice that Federal Reserve Governor, Lisa D. Cook, committed mortgage fraud by designating her out of state condo as her primary residence, just two weeks after taking a loan on her Michigan home… pic.twitter.com/3hlknQ4yzF
Crackdown on Individual Freedoms Continues in South Korea Under Communist Chinese Pressure
August 20, 2025
South Korean students protest against communist China’s influence in the country in front of the Chinese Embassy in March. N News
Our contact in South Korea sent The Gateway Pundit an update on the suppression of speech and loss of individual rights under the current pro-Chinese regime.
It is hard to believe that South Korea, a country that fought a bloody war against the communists 70 years ago, is now sliding under communist control.
The alarming suppression of freedom of expression currently taking place in South Korea:
In recent months, conservative civic groups and organizations supporting former President Yoon Suk-yeol have been systematically targeted by investigations. What makes this situation particularly serious is that these crackdowns are happening under clear pressure from China, with the current administration’s cooperation.
Key Cases
1. Banners Against Messenger/SNS Censorship (Prosecuted under Election Law)
A civic group hung banners calling for the protection of students’ freedom of expression. Just before the election, police raided the home and office of the group’s leader, claiming this violated the Public Official Election Act.
However, the banners simply said “No censorship” and did not name or support any candidate or party. This represents a dangerous misuse of election law to criminalize basic social criticism.
2. Welcome Event for U.S. Ambassador Mors H. Tan (July 18, 2025)
Citizens gathered at Incheon Airport to welcome U.S. human rights lawyer and former Ambassador-at-Large Mors H. Tan. Police classified this voluntary gathering as an “illegal assembly” and placed about 600 people under investigation.
Such treatment is in sharp contrast to how fan gatherings for celebrities or athletes at airports are tolerated without issue.
3. Protest in Front of the Chinese Embassy (Reported Aug 19, 2025)
During a rally condemning election fraud, members of a student group supporting former President Yoon tore a banner depicting Xi Jinping and the Chinese Ambassador. Police charged them under “insulting foreign envoys,” a criminal offense.
This shows how political protest is being suppressed through criminal prosecution.
4. China’s Direct Interference and Korean Government’s Compliance
Former Chinese Ambassador Xing Haiming openly demanded that the Korean government “crack down on anti-China forces.”
Chinese state media Global Times warned South Korea against cooperating with the U.S. in shipbuilding, even suggesting that Korea “could face risks” if integrated into the U.S. defense system.
President Lee Jae-myung himself stated at a cabinet meeting:
> “얼마 전에 보니까 중국 외교공관 앞에서 표현의 자유를 넘어서는 욕설과 폭력이 난무하는 혐오 시위가 벌어졌다. 다양성과 포용성을 중시하는 민주주의 모범 국가라는 대한민국의 위상에 결코 걸맞지 않은 모습이다. 재발하지 않도록 필요한 조치를 철저히 취하라. 필요하다면 제도적 보완책도 마련해달라.”
(English translation:
“Not long ago, I saw a hateful protest in front of the Chinese diplomatic mission, where insults and violence beyond freedom of expression were rampant. This is by no means fitting for the dignity of the Republic of Korea, which should be a model democracy that values diversity and inclusiveness. Take thorough measures to prevent recurrence. If necessary, also prepare institutional supplementary measures.”)
Immediately afterward, police summoned groups like “Free University” for investigation and charged them with “insulting foreign envoys.”
Chinese Ambassador Dai Bing praised President Lee’s remarks, saying he “highly appreciates” such actions. This clearly demonstrates a coordinated suppression of expression, aligning Chinese demands with Korean government measures.
—
Conclusion:
These incidents prove that the suppression of freedom of expression in South Korea is not just a domestic political matter. It is the result of Chinese pressure combined with the Korean government’s compliance, creating a direct threat to the foundations of the free world.
I earnestly request that the international community pay close attention to this situation, and help to expose the human rights violations and suppression of freedom now taking place in South Korea.
Fighting Back Against The 65 Project – Time to Give the Lefties Some Serious Pain
August 20, 2025
Melissa Moss and Michael Teter from the radical anti-American 65 Project funded by Law Works.
For a generation it seems, Lefties do whatever they want to conservatives, and everyone just takes it – without repercussions.
That may be the case in the political world, but things are working out a bit differently in the Big Data area.
Big Data guys have really sharp elbows and lawyers do not scare us at all. We, however, scare the living daylights out of some Lefty lawyers.
You will remember the 65 Project is – continues to be – a bare-knuckled attack on attorneys who defended anything to do with Trump in 2020 or the subsequent years.
Read that again – attorneys who did their job – representing people around Trump, were harassed by a Leftist-funded group – The 65 Project, to make sure no lawyer in America would do what they were sworn to do – be an advocate for a client.
It is still happening.
Child molesters have lawyers who are never harassed by Leftist groups. There is probably a reason for that but let’s not go there.
Murderers, serial murderers, creatures causing the greatest harm in our country have lawyers – nobody would think of attacking those lawyers – because everyone has the right to counsel.
Everyone except a conservative.
Omega4America first got sucked into this maelstrom with John Eastman.
We received a call from Eastman, who we never heard of, saying the California bar was going to kick him out for his election integrity work.
He was one of the guys advising Trump around the January 6 timeframe – regarding how to deal with election fraud.
Eastman said Omega research could help – if we could demonstrate there was enough voter fraud in 2020 to change the outcome of the election.
Never passing up a good fight, our response was that there was provably enough 2020 voter fraud in Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona to change those outcomes, and we could demonstrate that data – so sure, we would help.
For free – no $450 an hour expert witness fee like the other guys took.
Then came the “deposition.”
We joined a Zoom call and a young California, yuppie lawyer – the guy trying to kick Eastman out of the profession – started asking questions, under oath.
Here is our recollection of how it went:
Lawyer: So in 2020, was there any voter fraud?
Omega: Sure, tons of it, like in every swing state.
Lawyer: It wasn’t enough to change the election though?
Omega: Sure it was. It was hundreds of thousands of votes in each swing state.
Lawyer: So that’s your opinion, right?
Omega: No, we ran the voter rolls and found that many bogus ballots – and we can show them to you if you want.
Lawyer: What is your algorithm?
Omega: We don’t have an algorithm – we just check voter rolls, compare them with property tax rolls and find people voting from Walmarts and laundromats by the thousands.
Lawyer: How can you be sure? How would ypu know there was fraud?
Omega: We run the voter rolls for the 7 swing states – we can show you today there are hundreds of thousands of bogus ballots in the system from 2020.
We can do it now, want to see it?
Lawyer: Silence
24 hours later the Eastman team told the Omega data guys the California lawyers had us kicked off the case – they did not want us to be an expert witness.
This is the kind of crap going on and nobody is standing up for these guys like Eastman, who we think is a pretty good guy with exemplary credentials. He just got royally screwed.
That stopped this week.
It’s a quiet evening and the Omega guys get a call from a nice person who just got added to the 65 Project – perhaps it now the 66 Project or maybe since they got Eastman’s scalp, they need another to add up to 65.
No names here – do not ask me.
This person said they were being sued or legally harassed by the 65 Project and would Omega run the Dark Money Tracking System – which tracks every NGO – down to what they had for lunch every day – would we help out?
Now, remember, the 65 Project is just a couple of Lefties with tons of funding from NGOs – and the Omega guys track every NGO – watch our videos.
The Omega data team, who loathes political types, and would rather fight than sleep, immediately said yes.
Follow along, there is a much bigger story brewing here.
First, we reposted our videos from the Omega4America.com site of the 65 Project funders – you can see it here.
Then we called some of the lawyers who the 65 Project already hassled and chatted with them. They said they wanted to band together to take these Lefties down.
That’s a fight and we don’t have to be asked to join – we’re in!
Forgive us for not getting the lawyer stuff down but here is the skinny. This is going to be good and Omega is in the thick of it, where we usually end up.
When you are the 65 Project guys and you publicly go out and say these 65 lawyers – one is a governor, a bunch are Attorneys General or other high office holders – like Ted Cruz, Alan Dershowitz – you say they should have their reputations ruined and their ability to earn a living stopped – you have crossed the line.
It’s not our line, it’s the tortious line.
It’s OK to say that Billy Bob – some elected official is an incompetent fool – there is no legal action from that – first, because the law protects that speech and second because if he or she is a politico it is probably true.
All that stops when you say Billy Bob is an attorney, and we are deliberately going to screw up his life so he cannot make a living – because he represented a client.
That is the “tortious line.”
At the end lies a pot of gold – like the rainbow.
Wise combatants would screw up Billy Bob’s life – they would not publicly say so – which the 65 Project guys did.
They said, on their site and publicly, they were going to destroy people for doing things they found to be not their thing.
They aren’t trying to get these lawyers disbarred for sex with an underage child. They aren’t attacking these lawyers for embezzling client funds.
The Project 65 kids publicly state they are ruining prominent lawyer’s lives, destroying their livelihood – because these lawyers represented a client they found abhorrent – who is the President of the United States – to boot!
In law, my legal guy said this – there is a thing called tortious interference. Tortious means it was done in an evil, deliberate manner.
When you hear the word tortious there is a string attached to it. The string ties to another word = damages.
There is even one more string, it ties to punitive damages.
If you screw up my life, on purpose, because you disagree with me, to hurt me, I can collect damages. In many cases damages get into punitives – which can be 3x or more of the award – not where you want to be as the defendant.
We all know two things about the court system – it is inherently corrupt – judges do what gets them invited to cocktail parties, and it is highly attuned who is the Big Dog.
When Project 65 went after John Eastman, full of bluster, their guys were in power.
Their guys are still in power, but now there is a Department of Justice on a hunting expedition for people and organizations harassing Trumpster lawyers.
Stuff changed. Punitives are now possible.
So what’s the point?
We are now working with a number of these lawyers – hunted by the 65 Project – and we are the hunters.
This part is complicated, but it’s the fun part so hang on.
The 65 Project is just a couple of kids, with no or few assets.
You can sue the heck out of them but you won’t get much. Hang on.
We show there are not just 4 or 5 organizations funding these 2 kids – they are part of a “galaxy view” of 10,000 organizations who fund each other – constant money flows, and our lawyer pals think they could make a claim against over 10,000 organizations.
Omega can show these orgs are intertwined in a vast set of formerly invisible connections – thus each of them was behind the two kids. And these organizations have billions of dollars in assets – like cash, in the U.S.A. which can assuage the feelings of 65 very pissed off lawyers.
Punitive damages – against the entire Lefty financial ecosystem. In one Fractal swoop!
Think billions – so who wants to roll those dice?
You have to watch the videos to get it – it’s too long to type here, but with Fractal analysis we can show NGO A, gave dough to NGO B, who gave dough to NGO C – who gave dough to the 2 kids on the 65 Project – and thus they are all liable because the ties show they all support those nefarious activities.
Uh Oh!
We are looking at BILLIONS in damages plus punitives – from obscure orgs who fund this crap for decades.
It gets better.
Because we are Fractal, we aren’t limited by the government 990 IRS records – we can get into the people – by name – who fund these NGOs. Thus, their personal assets are up on the Black Jack table for our Project 65 guys to take a swap at.
The Omega Dark Money System turns on the lights – and all these thousands of NGOs are now at risk.
So what are we doing with the person who just got added to the 65 Project?
We are working with them to tie them to the rest of the Project 65 victims – they are evaluating statue of limitations issues – which seem OK, and our data will show 10,000 organizations who may be in line for “tortious” interference stuff.
Big Data and Fractal analysis can expose every person who wrote a check to any of those NGOs.
That is what Big Data guys do to Lefty lawyers who do not let us testify.
Omega4America is a Substack newsletter about the application of advanced, quantum speed technology to government rolls. Portions of our proceeds are given to animal rescue charities.
RECENTLY, I stood in Las Vegas and spoke. Heroes were there—Rudy Giuliani, Captain Chris Kuehne, Lara Logan, others. They told of the government’s oppressive fist on their lives. Giuliani, hit with a 148-million-dollar verdict for speaking of rigged elections. A corrupt judge barred his evidence. Truth stayed locked away.
Captain Kuehne, a Marine, a veteran, carried scars from bombs and shrapnel from his defense of our nation. His door splintered under the biggest SWAT raid of the J6ers. Dozens of FBI marauders invaded his home, bringing his mind back to war-torn regions beset with Islamic terrorists. His wife, pregnant, and his four-year-old son faced gun barrels, red laser dots on their skin. Kuehne was caged by men that swore the same oath he did. His wife lost their unborn child, broken by the government’s boots. Crippling legal bills have followed. Consider helping them get back on their feet here.
Their stories haunt me. I’m no stranger to lawfare and death threats. So, I feel a certain kinship. But to exercise the demons holding a place between my ears, I’ve crossed 49 states in three years, sounding the warning. People ask what to do with the vestiges of a weaponized government clinging like squatters to a building newly repossessed by a landlord that has been away for four years. The landlord is Trump. The building is our temple. America.
I say “treason” and point to the law’s punishment. The press twists my words, call me dangerous, and shame anyone that speaks similar words. Words that pinpoint what they have done. To speak the words treason, invasion, or rebellion, hits them like a spell, cutting through their black magic insurrection. They hate the light of truth that repels their lie-filled projection. They hate when the scalpel is pointed in their direction, cutting open their rot for the world to see. I say those words must burn on every American’s tongue until Giuliani and Kuehne see justice.
Treason. Invasion. Rebellion. Say them with me class.
So, here is the speech I gave, titled “Mr. President, Look to Lincoln and Act: Arrests, Tribunals, and War Powers.”
UNTIL THE CULPRITS behind the rigged election of 2020 are held to account, our nation will continue to bleed, its heart stabbed by betrayal. Electronic poll books twist voter names, erasing the living, conjuring ghosts. Tabulators hum, flipping votes like a crooked gambler. Hackers breach election systems, rewriting truth with lies. Algorithms churn impossible numbers, defying reason, mocking the people’s will. Election night screens flash as a cruel charade. NGOs funnel dark money, stuffing ballots like leaves in a storm.
The Department of Homeland Security and its splinter groups, whether the CIA or FBI, orchestrated treason alongside foreign hands—nation-states plotting to gut our republic. In my humble opinion, at least three-quarters of Congress and judges, their names on fraudulent ballots, stand as hollow shells, their legitimacy dead.
Donald Trump stands at the edge of it all, staring at two futures. A Republic in ruin if he doesn’t see the draining of the swamp through. Or, the culmination of greatest Whitehat operation ever imagined, providing America with the chance to experience its greatest renaissance. What will it take to fix our elections in the next calendar year and imprison those who tried to put a bullet in the President’s head and the nation’s heart?
What are the answers to such rebellion?
Over the past five years, President Abraham Lincoln’s ghost looms large. He was presented with a similar choice. His 1861 suspension of “habeas corpus” was the tool wielded, a very dangerous tool. I can imagine him saying “I will not let our country splinter and fall into a slaver’s hell.”
But in the year of our Lord, 2025, to speak of suspending habeas corpus, is to watch Republican paper tigers and Conservative Inc. desperately fall over themselves, fleeing the adult’s table. They must get away from the one thing required to end the slaver’s charade. It’s not safe for clicks, follows, and views. They’ve mastered avoiding the third rail. They serve the almighty algorithm. They play at patriot games that have left so many reputations in tatters. And the kids of real patriots, have no future until there is a deep state reckoning.
The Constitution expressly permits suspension of habeas corpus—Article I, Section 9—when rebellion or invasion strikes. So, I ask, do we not have both, even now? It’s easy to breathe a sigh of relief now that Trump is in, and Biden is out. But just eight short months ago, we saw the culmination of millions of invaders let into the country.
Trump knows we also have a digital rebellion contained in our election code, the modern day Fifth column. November 3, 2020, was the coup without blood. January 6th began the hunt for all that had courage to say out loud what their eyes could see, what their ears could hear. They have weathered the storm for four long years, restored to life like Lazarus, upon Trump’s return.
But the invaders at the southern border were not hidden. We saw our screens flash with 10 million, 20 million, who knows how many, clearing a path throughout the heartland, on planes chartered by our own government. A slap to the face of Americans. The tyrant so comfortable, he cares no more about the optics of even pretending he cares. A path that allowed the invaders to obtain a driver’s license with no push back at your local DMV.
And because of the Motor Voter Law signed into existence by Bill Clinton, which automatically adds those doing DMV business to the voter rolls, hundreds of thousands of fake ballots were generated and deposited into drop boxes across our country, destroying the sanctity of our sacred right to vote. The illegals didn’t vote at a polling location. But a ballot assigned to the invader was generated out of thin air. And it scanned as true as anything submitted by an American citizen through the election black boxes.
Yes, the force of nature known as Trump prevailed this last November. But how many down ballot races were lost to this digital and illegal alien invasion? Conservative estimates say “We the People” were cheated out of eight U.S. senate seats, and 30 house seats. Nevada’s Sam Brown and Arizona’s Kari Lake were both casualties of this fraudulent system. So was a super majority in the Senate.
Under these ever-present examples, I submit, Trump can lawfully suspend the writ, jail the offenders—whether at DHS, the CIA, the NGO schemers and election officials turned traitors—until the nation breathes again. The path is narrow. The blade sharp and ready to cut if not carried out with precision.
You see there is one seminal Supreme court case that provides a map of where a Commander-in-Chief’s power starts and stops in a scenario such as ours. The Youngstown Steel decision. Specifically, Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence. President Truman seized the steel mills to keep war’s machines grinding. The Supreme Court, six voices strong, struck back, declaring his act beyond the Constitution’s edge. Jackson, a sharp-minded jurist, former attorney general, and Nuremberg prosecutor, warned of executive overreach while allowing room for crisis-driven action.
I’ll endeavor to simplify what was written.
Trump’s strength peaks if Congress backs him, their powers fused. It wanes in the twilight of congressional silence, where urgency might justify bold moves. It collapses if Congress fights him, leaving only his Article II powers, frail against constitutional checks.
So, I ask you with three-quarters of Congress tainted, with ghouls like Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Jaime Raskin, and Adam Swalwell all having sold out to their Marxist handlers in the rebellion, can Trump operate at the peak of his strength? Can he rely on Congress? Has Senator John Thune helped Trump with recess appointments?
The answer is no.
This means Trump must claim the twilight of Congress’ silence or anticipate defiance. What could Trump do in such twilight? Could he rest on his Article II powers alone?
It’s not a question of whether Trump could act. It’s a matter of whether Trump can see the problem as clearly as Lincoln. It’s a matter of life and death to our Republic. After Trump survived a silent coup, multiple assassination attempts, he must wield evidence—hacked systems, laundered cash, impossible vote spikes—to stand before history. The evidence exists.
But the producers of that evidence have been investigated, indicted, prosecuted, disbarred, and some, like Tina Peters, have been imprisoned. The sixth complaint and investigation to strip me of my law license was initiated for merely visiting Tina Peters in prison. That is how petty and evil these demons are. The corrupt courts navigated by Marc Elias and Perkins Couie, will push back. The people, their trust thin as ice after the Epstein files debacle, will turn on Trump if they smell tyranny.
Lincoln’s precedent burns brightest. In 1861, using his commander-in-chief powers, he jailed men like John Merryman, a Maryland militia officer and farmer who burned bridges to aid the Confederacy. Roger Taney, Chief Justice and author of Dred Scott, ruled from a circuit court that Lincoln’s suspension was unconstitutional, insisting only Congress held that power.
Lincoln, undeterred, asked if one law’s fall should doom all the rest. By 1863, Congress passed the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act, retroactively blessing his moves. Under the Youngstown framework, Lincoln went from his lowest ebb of power to his peak as soon as Congress acted. In the current landscape, the money laundering entities known as “ActBlue” and “WinRed” are aiding and abetting a newfound Uniparty confederacy, bankrolling the swamp and legalizing election fraud. They have lined the coffers of the legislature, buying their silence and much more if a favor is called in.
Lincoln did more than arrest John Merryman. As a state bordering Washington, D.C., Maryland held immense strategic importance. The state was deeply divided, with a significant portion of its population sympathetic to the Confederacy due to its slaveholding economy and proximity to Virginia, which had seceded on April 17, 1861. Despite this, Maryland remained in the Union, creating a tense internal conflict. President Lincoln, fearing Maryland’s secession would isolate the nation’s capital, acted decisively.
Ten days after Virginia seceded, Lincoln surgically suspended habeas corpus along the rail line from Washington to Philadelphia, allowing military arrests of suspected secessionists without immediate trial. This move quelled the immediate threat, as Union forces secured key areas, with Maryland’s legislature ultimately voting to stay in the Union on April 29, 1861, though under duress. The crisis underscored Maryland’s precarious balance between Union loyalty and Confederate sympathy, driving Lincoln’s controversial but effective response.
Lincoln’s net caught thousands, including Clement Vallandigham, a lawyer and democrat congressman, who denounced the Civil War as unconstitutional, opposed emancipation, and called for peace with the Confederacy. In other words, he wanted the slaves to continue wearing chains. His 1863 speech in Mount Vernon, Ohio, drew the ire of Ambrose Burnside, a Union general. Burnside, issued General Order No. 38, banning disloyal talk. He arrested Vallandigham, tried him by military tribunal, and convicted him. The Supreme Court avoided review of the use of military tribunals, cementing Lincoln’s wartime power.
I can think of many congressmen that Trump’s generals should be evaluating for a similar tribunal.
History offers more echoes.
In 1871, Ulysses S. Grant, the Union general turned president, targeted the Ku Klux Klan in South Carolina, where terror choked Reconstruction. Congress, through the Ku Klux Klan Act, let him suspend habeas corpus in nine counties. Federal troops arrested hundreds, crushing the Klan’s spine. No court overturned it; the crisis demanded action.
In 1902, the Philippines, under U.S. rule, saw Adna Chaffee, a seasoned general, suspend habeas corpus in rebel provinces to jail guerrillas during the Philippine-American War’s aftermath. The Constitution’s reach blurred in territories, but the act stood, a blunt tool for order. More recently, the Philippines have sued Smartmatic, the election vendor, after learning that the software is a cheater’s dream.
After 9/11, George W. Bush, a deep state prince under the control of his father, never suspended habeas but dodged it for Guantanamo Bay detainees, labeling them enemy combatants beyond U.S. soil. Yaser Hamdi, a U.S. citizen captured in Afghanistan, and Shafiq Rasul, a British citizen detained there, challenged their detentions. I don’t know of their real guilt in the grand scheme of things, as two buildings were hit, but three collapsed in free fall.
What I do know is that we should be cataloging how the CEOs of Dominion, Smartmatic, ES&S, TotalVote, and countless others are designated. Do we count them as digital enemy combatants that have disrupted the elections of a hundred nations? Or fraudsters that should be tried by the DOJ in our civilian courts? I ask because time is of the essence. If we do not clean up elections through Trump’s national emergency power, the swamp will not only grow back, but it will strangle the remaining life of MAGA.
Trump faces a beast unlike any. Lincoln battled rifled muskets; Trump fights a digital plague, a cancer in the nation’s veins. The Department of Homeland security’s hand was in all of it, which brands their actions as treason. Foreign collusion with Serbia and Venezuela—have facilitated this invasion by stealth. Nicholas Maduro is now being hunted with a 50-million-dollar reward. Is this move a sign of his dirty hands steering our elections?
The wholesale subversion of our Republic mirrors the Confederate threat, though no soldiers march. The scale of it all: The vast majority of Congress, judges, nominees, are suspect. The government, the people’s voice, teeters. Yet, Justice Jackson’s framework lights the way.
When the time comes, if Congress, or its untainted remnant, passes a modern-day suspension act to deal with the culprits of our rigged elections, Trump’s power peaks, as Lincoln’s did in 1863. If Congress stays mute, crippled or complicit, he can act in the twilight, claiming necessity. If Congress resists, its legitimacy in doubt, Trump risks the lowest ebb, facing judicial fire. He is no stranger to fire, real or metaphorical, as he is already dealing with a judicial coup where black robed activists have tried to make it illegal to deport terrorists.
Evidence will be Trump’s shield. Cybersecurity reports from DNI’s Tulsi Gabbard—of hacked poll books, modems in tabulators, flaws in Dominion or ES&S systems—prove the breach. Vote spikes defying exit polls, bellwether counties flipping impossibly, scream fraud. Financial trails, NGOs laundering foreign cash, tie the plot to enemies abroad.
Trump must lay it bare, show the people the rot, to keep trust from breaking. And the evidence must come from sources that President Trump now commands. Whether Space Force or the NSA. Secure a FISA warrant and obtain the cyber forensics that mere civilians such as myself could never obtain. Put the questions over our rigged elections to rest.
Release evidence. Every. Single. Day.
I say drown the CIA backed legacy media. Waterboard them with literal truth until their lying lungs collapse.
With these actions, Trump can act. Wisdom suggests he has been acting this whole time. How else did he return against all odds to his post as Commander-in-Chief?
If necessary, history presents the way to lawfully suspend habeas corpus, jail the architects of a rigged election system going back decades. Military tribunals for the architects and hitmen. Lesser criminal acts can be tried by Pam Bondi and the DOJ. To bring hope in just one short year will require a symphony of both military and civilian justice.
There is no need for political vendettas, just those guilty of our nation’s highest crimes, held until trials find truth.
Risks loom large. If judges lack legitimacy, their rulings may falter, and they’ll fight to keep power. The people, divided, could see Trump a tyrant, not a savior. Lincoln’s actions sparked fury; Trump’s enemies could roar louder. Without proof—ironclad, public—he risks collapse. We have the evidence, and Trump has the bully pulpit to shove it down the throats of our nation’s enemies.
History whispers warnings. Andrew Jackson, a fiery general and president, defied courts in the 1830s. Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, interning Japanese Americans, the act later deemed a national shame. Both show the cost of excess. Trump must move with precision, echoing Lincoln’s focus, not Roosevelt’s sweeping power grab.
But the Civil War casts the longest shadow. Lincoln, the rail-splitter who rose to greatness, jailed thousands, yet the republic stood. Grant, the stoic general, crushed the Klan with a targeted suspension. Each time, crisis justified action, but only if power knelt to law in the end.
Trump must choose in the months to come. He risks the tyrant’s label, but if he waits, he risks something more. The Republic’s heart will stop. Justice Jackson’s words urge caution but allow boldness when the nation’s life hangs thin. Evidence, openness, a steady hand—these will carry Trump, as they carried Lincoln.
David K. Clements is a seasoned attorney, former law professor, filmmaker and dedicated advocate for election integrity and constitutional rights. If you think he’s on to something, consider being a monthly sponsor of his independent journalism at:
The DEA Launches Project Portero: Historic Offensive Against Mexican Cartels Responsible for 90,000 American Deaths from Fentanyl Overdoses Each Year
August 20, 2025
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
