A bombshell revelation is brewing in Washington. According to a high-level source inside the Trump administration, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is now reviewing a secret dossier on the December 6, 2024 coup d’état in Romania—one that points directly to former Biden regime officials.

The file reportedly names three top Biden operatives: disgraced Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, his assistant James O’Brien, and U.S. Ambassador to Bucharest Kathleen Kavalec. Their fingerprints, according to the source, are all over Romania’s election annulment.

In a scheme that looks eerily familiar, the Biden crew allegedly teamed up with Romanian insiders—including former Foreign Minister Luminita Odobescu, ex-Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu, and former President Klaus Iohannis—to overturn Romania’s presidential vote under the tired pretext of “Russian interference.”

Sound familiar? It certainly ought. to. It’s the same playbook the globalist, anti-American establishment used against President Trump in 2016—copy, paste, repeat.

This week, former Romanian presidential candidate Călin Georgescu dropped a stunner while speaking outside the Bucharest District Police Department, where he’s forced to report weekly under judicial control.

He said, quote:

“As you have seen, the brave DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard has exposed all those who fabricated the file of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, where President Trump won fair and square. I guarantee that the file of the annulment of the elections in Romania is also on the table of the U.S. intelligence services, with clear perpetrators identified, former high-ranking officials from the Biden administration as well as their tools in Bucharest.”

Georgescu went further, blasting French President Emmanuel Macron’s meddling in Romania, promising he’ll be “sent packing with his tail between his legs.” Does he know more than he’s letting on?

The Trump administration has clearly taken notice. In May, the Department of Homeland Security revoked Romania’s entry into the Visa Waiver Program—a move Romania’s own foreign minister later admitted was punishment for the fraudulent annulment of its elections. T

The State Department’s latest Democracy Report also singled out Romania for trampling its voters’ rights.

And here’s the kicker: during President Trump’s historic summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, Romania came up. For 4 minutes and 57 seconds, the source says, the two leaders discussed Brussels’ and Paris’s role in Romania’s December coup.

The story is still unfolding, but one thing’s certain: the Biden network’s dirty tricks weren’t limited to America. They exported the same authoritarian tactics overseas—and now, under President Trump, the truth is starting to surface.

The post Deep State Exposed: Biden Officials Implicated in Globalist Romanian Coup – File Reportedly on DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s Desk appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The British government is at it again, weaponizing its so-called “Online Safety Act” to crack down on speech it doesn’t like.

This time, the target is none other than the online forum 4chan, the notorious online discussion board where anonymous users post unfiltered commentary that sends elites into fits.

On June 10, 2025, Ofcom, the UK’s Orwellian Office of Communications, opened an official investigation into 4chan.

According to Ofcom, the platform failed to hand over information on demand, did not file the “appropriate illegal content risk assessments,” and didn’t bow to London’s censorship mandates. In other words, 4chan refused to bend the knee.

By August 13, Ofcom escalated matters, issuing a provisional notice of contravention under the Act and threatening fines of £20,000 ($27,100) plus daily penalties until the platform complied.

According to the notice:

Provisional Decision: Information Notice duties

In accordance with section 130 of the Online Safety Act 2023, we have today issued 4chan Community Support LLC with a provisional notice of contravention.

Ofcom is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing the provider has contravened its duties under section 102(8) of the Act to comply with two requests for information. We will consider any representations provided in response to this provisional notice before we make a final decision on this matter.

The additional duties under investigation

On 10 June 2025, we opened an investigation into whether the provider of 4chan has failed/is failing to comply with its duties under the Online Safety Act 2023 to:

• adequately respond to a statutory information request;
• complete and keep a record of a suitable and sufficient illegal content risk assessment; and
• comply with the safety duties about illegal content.

Ofcom’s investigation continues to examine concurrently whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that the provider has failed, or is failing, to comply with the other duties under investigation, including duties to protect its users from illegal content. We will provide updates on these matters in due course.

But instead of cowering, 4chan and its legal team fired back with a blistering response that left Ofcom and Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s censors utterly humiliated.

In a blistering legal statement posted by Byrne & Storm, P.C. and Coleman Law, P.C., 4chan’s lawyers dismantled Ofcom’s fantasy that they had authority over an American company.

The statement went further, warning that U.S. federal authorities had already been briefed and that the Trump Administration should be prepared to step in to defend American companies against foreign censorship mandates.

The statement reads:

According to press reports, the U.K. Office of Communications (“Ofcom”) has issued a provisional notice under the Online Safety Act alleging a contravention by 4chan and indicating an intention to impose a penalty of £20,000, plus daily penalties thereafter.

4chan is a United States company, incorporated in Delaware, with no establishment, assets, or operations in the United Kingdom. Any attempt to impose or enforce a penalty against 4chan will be resisted in U.S. federal court.

American businesses do not surrender their First Amendment rights because a foreign bureaucrat sends them an e-mail. Under settled principles of U.S. law, American courts will not enforce foreign penal fines or censorship codes.

If necessary, we will seek appropriate relief in U.S. federal court to confirm these principles.

United States federal authorities have been briefed on this matter.

The Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, was reportedly warned by the White House to cease targeting Americans with U.K. censorship codes (according to reporting in the Telegraph on July 30th).

Despite these warnings, Ofcom continues its illegal campaign of harassment against American technology firms. A political solution to this matter is urgently required and that solution must come from the highest levels of American government.

We call on the Trump Administration to invoke all diplomatic and legal levers available to the United States to protect American companies from extraterritorial censorship mandates.

Our client reserves all rights.

Byrne & Storm, P.C. (@ByrneStorm) and Coleman Law, P.C. (@RonColeman) represent 4Chan.

We issue this statement on behalf of our client in response to press reports indicating that the U.K. Office of Communications, aka @Ofcom, intends to fine our client. pic.twitter.com/SVjmzlyuKK

— Preston Byrne (@prestonjbyrne) August 15, 2025

Attorney Preston Byrne then unleashed a series of devastating posts on X, reminding UK regulators just how badly they had overstepped.

“The UK government should now understand that any attempt to touch any American company, however small, will be met with a coordinated U.S. legal response.”

The UK government should now understand that any attempt to touch any American company, however small, will be met with a coordinated U.S. legal response.

We will not let any American be picked on by any foreign power.

— Preston Byrne (@prestonjbyrne) August 15, 2025

“UK law applies on UK soil to UK people. Only Parliament can repeal it. My objective is to remind the UK that the Battle of Yorktown had political consequences, as they seem to have forgotten.”

I mean, UK law applies on UK soil to UK people. Only Parliament can repeal it.

My objective is to remind the UK that the Battle of Yorktown had political consequences, as they seem to have forgotten. https://t.co/NRLT03Spn9

— Preston Byrne (@prestonjbyrne) August 16, 2025

“4chan has done nothing wrong, and it won’t be paying the UK a dime. I have the bravest clients. I am inspired by their courage.”

I have the bravest clients. I am inspired by their courage.https://t.co/bskNeMqbdK

— Preston Byrne (@prestonjbyrne) August 17, 2025

The post UK Government Moves to Investigate 4chan Under Draconian ‘Online Safety Act’ — Platform’s SAVAGE Response Leaves Them Humiliated appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Guest post by Kim Yu-jin, Citizen of South Korea

Can you imagine a former president and first lady jailed at the same time — and the personal data of 5 million citizens seized by the regime?

In 2025, this nightmare has become my reality. This is not justice.

It is a planned political purge that should alarm everyone who values freedom, the rule of law, and the U.S.-Korea alliance.

A First in History — and a Dangerous Precedent

On January 19, 2025, former President Yoon Suk-yeol was arrested on vague “evidence tampering” charges.

Prosecutors alleged he tried to conceal certain records, yet presented no clear evidence or case outline.

He was detained for 52 days until March 8, when a court ruled his detention had “seriously violated his right to legal defense” and ordered his release.

But the authorities ignored this ruling. On July 10, Yoon was arrested again on nearly identical charges. The court rejected his appeal and sent him back to prison — raising serious concerns of double jeopardy and judicial abuse.

Then, on August 12, something never before seen in South Korea’s democracy occurred. Former First Lady Kim Keon-hee was immediately jailed on the order of the Seoul Southern District Court.

The warrant was issued without sufficient investigation or evidence — based solely on a claim of “possible evidence destruction.” Legal experts inside and outside Korea agree this decision fails to meet both domestic and international standards of justice.

The simultaneous jailing of a former president and first lady is no coincidence. It is a political move to eliminate all opposition.

Targeting the Lifeline of the Opposition — 5 Million Party Members

On the same day, prosecutors raided the headquarters of the People Power Party (PPP), the main opposition, and demanded the full membership list of roughly 5 million people — including names, political affiliations, and joining records.

This brazen act directly violates:

• The South Korean Constitution, which guarantees party independence
• The Personal Information Protection Act, which bans processing political affiliation data without consent
• The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which protects freedom of association and privacy

Such data could be exploited for election surveillance, personal intimidation, and targeting of political dissidents. In effect, it lays the foundation for a surveillance and intimidation regime designed to silence citizens.

Cruel and Inhumane Detention Conditions

The persecution does not end with arrest.

Former President Yoon is confined in a tiny 5.6㎡ (60 sq. ft.) solitary cell with no air conditioning during a brutal heatwave. Lights are kept on 24 hours a day, and ventilation is extremely poor.

His health is deteriorating. His doctor warned of “imminent risk of blindness” from an untreated eye condition, while his diabetes has worsened.
Yet he has been denied timely medical treatment. Care has been restricted and delayed, and even during external hospital visits he was forced to wear electronic shackles and handcuffs.

He has also been denied access to Mors H. Tan, a human rights lawyer and former U.N. ambassador.

Such treatment meets the U.N. definition of “cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.” Under the Mandela Rules, the state is obligated to provide proper medical care, humane living conditions, and access to legal counsel — all of which have been blatantly ignored in Yoon’s case.

The Political Intent Is Clear

This is not an accident, nor an isolated case. Analysts call it nothing less than a “roadmap to authoritarianism.”

The strategy is clear:

1. Remove Yoon from the political stage before the next election.
2. Neutralize Kim Keon-hee as a symbol of resistance.
3. Intimidate the conservative base by seizing the data of 5 million party members.

Every step points to a coordinated plan to eliminate the opposition.

Voices of Warning Inside Korea

This is not only my view. Prominent figures across South Korea are sounding the alarm.

Conservative leaders such as Kim Moon-soo and Na Kyung-won have condemned the detentions as “grave human rights violations” and “political retaliation.”

The People Power Party leadership declared the demand for the full membership list illegal.
Legal scholars are calling for Global Magnitsky sanctions to bring international pressure on the regime.

Why the World Must Act

South Korea is America’s frontline ally in the defense of freedom. Yet its government is now employing the same authoritarian tactics we have seen elsewhere — arbitrary detention, suppression of opposition, and intimidation of political supporters.

This is not just a Korean problem. In Turkey, Erdogan’s regime repeatedly jailed opposition politicians to rig elections. In Hungary, Viktor Orbán has crushed media and party independence to entrench one-party rule. If such a precedent is allowed to stand in South Korea, authoritarian tactics will spread across Asia.

And make no mistake: political prosecutions of opponents is a trend that resonates beyond Asia. Many Americans fear similar abuses of power at home. What happens in Seoul should serve as a warning to Washington.

A Plea to the International Community

I urge governments, the media, and human rights organizations around the world:

Demand the immediate release of former President Yoon Suk-yeol and First Lady Kim Keon-hee.

Bring this case to the U.N. Human Rights Council.

Shine international media attention on these abuses.

Silence will be read as consent. If this becomes normalized in South Korea, it will soon be exported elsewhere.

As a citizen of South Korea, I watch with outrage, shock, and fear for my country’s future. But I also believe that international attention can bring change.

That is why I speak now. And I ask you to raise your voice as well.

Freedom does not survive on its own. It survives only when defended. The time to defend it is now.

The post An Unprecedented Crackdown in South Korea: Former President and First Lady Jailed, 5 Million Party Members Targeted appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Since the Burma coup in 2021, the resistance has been fighting to rid the country of the State Administrative Council (SAC), the military junta that overturned a democratic election and seized power.

Since then, the military has waged a war of repression, torture, and destruction against the people of Burma, particularly against ethnic and religious minorities, including Christians.

In the ethnic states and across the country, resistance armies have had success, recapturing about 80 percent of Burma’s territory. But the junta has the decisive advantage of aircraft, as the resistance has none.

The junta is supplied with weapons, money, and jet fuel from Russia and China, while resistance soldiers fight without pay, arming themselves with whatever weapons and equipment they can scrounge or make themselves.

The resistance fought well when the battlefield was the jungles and mountains, but now that the war is shifting to urban terrain, and with the junta dramatically expanding its drone capabilities, the fight has become far more difficult.

Pasaung is a crucial city in Karenni State. It was previously held by the junta, but in recent months the resistance has captured half of it. Soldiers were eager to push forward and take the rest of the city, which would open vital supply lines to Thailand.

On the morning of the Battle of Pasaung, I woke at 1 a.m., grabbed my body armor and equipment, and went to the Karenni Nationalities Defense Force (KNDF) barracks. From there, they transported me to the front.

Along the way, we passed countless truckloads of soldiers. It was as if the entire country had mobilized.

While the junta forces have state-of-the-art weapons from Russia and China, the resistance makes do with whatever weapons they can scrounge, make, or capture. The heat is intense, and the humidity during the rainy season is oppressive.

If you wear body armor, your shirt will be soaked through in seconds. Consequently, many resistance soldiers don’t wear a shirt under their armor. Sadly, many also have no armor at all and go to war shirtless.

The most common footwear are Chinese-made jungle boots, which I have also adopted—worn without socks to avoid jungle rot that destroys your feet. Many resistance soldiers wear flip-flops, slippers, or imitation Crocs, while some choose to go barefoot.

Near the front, I met up with the Free Burma Rangers (FBR), a faith-based frontline aid organization that has been providing combat medical assistance and training in Burma.

FBR has been active in Burma for over 25 years, and their presence underscores just how long this war has been going on. It began in 1948 but spread to engulf the entire country after the coup.

That means the war started before the parents, and probably even the grandparents, of most of the current soldiers were born.

Prior to the coup, there had been a national ceasefire. While fighting continued in some areas, there was relative peace in places like Karenni State. Many soldiers from those regions therefore consider the war to have begun in 2021.

Despite growing up with the chance to attend school and live somewhat normal lives, the four and a half years since the coup now represent more than a quarter of their lives, given how young they are.

Spending time with them on my many missions into the country, it seems they have adjusted to a new norm, where the war touches every aspect of every person’s life, every single day.

While artillery pounded and jets crisscrossed overhead, dropping ordnance, trucks from the various ethnic resistance armies arrived at the Free Burma Rangers casualty collection point, delivering both the wounded and the dead.

The Rangers worked on patients under cover in the jungle, with no electricity, no machines, and no refrigeration, meaning blood had to be taken directly from soldiers to save the lives of their comrades.

Resistance soldiers gathered at the casualty collection point, taking shelter as best they could while waiting to hear whether their comrades had survived.

The wounded soldier’s hand grenade and weapon are stained with blood. The blue tape indicates which unit he belongs to. With multiple ethnic armed organizations teaming up against the junta, it can sometimes be difficult to tell who is a friend and who is an enemy.

The weapons and equipment of the wounded soldiers are tossed to the side, out of the way, so the medics can operate. One very endearing aspect of this culture is that no one ever steals anything, not even food or money.

The trucks are all open with our equipment, even my cameras and the soldiers’ weapons, and yet we can park anywhere and the gear will not disappear.

After spending about half a day with FBR, I hopped onto a truck returning to the front. Story coming soon.

The post THE GATEWAY PUNDIT EXCLUSIVE: The War in Burma — At The Battle Front appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA), best known for his ties to Chinese spy Christine Fang and for humiliating himself on national television, went completely unhinged during an appearance on CNN Newsroom, where he openly fantasized about “burying Republicans below the Capitol.”

During the segment, host Omar Jimenez reminded Swalwell of Michelle Obama’s infamous mantra, “when they go low, we go high.”

But instead of embracing the supposedly lofty ideals Democrats love to preach, Swalwell spat venom.

Omar Jimenez:
Do you have any concern that it seems like ancient history at this point, but obviously, in the earlier Obama years, there was, of course, the old adage that at this point is old: “When they go low, we go high.”

It seems that fighting fire with fire meets them at that low point, I guess, to use that metaphor. Do you have any concern that this could overreach or could backfire?

Eric Swalwell:
No. When they go low, we’re going to bury them below the Capitol. That’s what we’re going to do, because this is about protecting democracy. Right now, as you see, D.C. has been militarized, and we were weak as Democrats, frankly.

WATCH:

BREAKING – Republicans are calling for Eric Swalwell to be censured and expelled after he openly called for violence, saying Republicans should be “buried below the Capitol” live on air on CNN. pic.twitter.com/YvsnasU4J8

— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) August 17, 2025

A sitting member of Congress actually said Republicans should be buried below the Capitol.

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) blasted Swalwell immediately, hammering him for his dangerous rhetoric:

Lauren Boebert: “In today’s edition of ‘Imagine the media reaction if I had been the one to say this…’ we have Eric Swalwell, without his Chinese spy girlfriend, on national TV saying Republicans should be buried below the Capitol.”

She’s exactly right. If a Republican had said anything remotely close to Swalwell’s threat, the media and Democrats would be foaming at the mouth, screaming about “incitement” and “dangerous extremism.”

Instead, Swalwell gets a free pass—because when Democrats call for violence, the press looks the other way.

In today’s edition of “Imagine the media reaction if I had been the one to say this…” we have Eric Swalwell, without his Chinese spy girlfriend, on national TV saying Republicans should be buried below the Capitol. https://t.co/mRF4lwGfy5

— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) August 17, 2025

The post Sleazebag Eric Swalwell Goes Full Unhinged — Says Republicans Should Be “Buried Below the Capitol” (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.