Harvard Astrophysicist Fans Alien Speculation After Detecting Odd Energy Signature on Interstellar Object

Harvard Astrophysicist Fans Alien Speculation After Detecting Odd Energy Signature on Interstellar Object
August 23, 2025

Astronomers detected the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS on July 1, 2025, using the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System telescope in Chile.

This marks the third confirmed interstellar visitor to our solar system, following ‘Oumuamua in 2017 and Borisov in 2019. NASA has classified it as a comet, estimating its size at 10 to 24 kilometers in diameter.

Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb has analyzed images showing an unusual glow at the object’s front rather than a trailing tail typical of comets.

He argues this brightness cannot result from reflected sunlight or standard outgassing of volatiles like water or carbon dioxide.

Loeb’s calculations indicate the luminosity reaches gigawatt levels, which he attributes to a possible internal power source.

Loeb has ruled out natural explanations such as a primordial black hole, which would produce negligible energy, or frictional heating from interstellar medium due to insufficient density.

He also dismisses a supernova radioactive fragment as statistically improbable. Instead, he proposes nuclear power as the most feasible compact source for the observed energy output.

In a paper co-authored with Adam Hibberd and Adam Crowl, Loeb suggests 3I/ATLAS could be an artificial spacecraft, potentially accumulating interstellar dust that emits forward under nuclear propulsion.

The object travels at approximately 210,000 kilometers per hour, the fastest recorded for a solar system visitor.

Spectral data show no cometary gases, and some observations lack a clear tail, though image smearing from motion complicates analysis.

The object’s trajectory originates from the Milky Way’s thick disk, possibly making it up to 7 billion years old, older than our solar system.

It follows a retrograde orbit aligned within 5 degrees of the ecliptic plane, passing close to Venus at 0.65 astronomical units, Mars at 0.19 AU, and Jupiter at 0.36 AU. Loeb calculates the probability of such alignments at 0.005 percent for random arrivals.

Loeb notes the perihelion on October 29, 2025, occurs opposite Earth relative to the Sun, at about 130 million miles away, potentially shielding it from detailed Earth-based observation.

He has urged NASA to redirect the Juno spacecraft or use the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter for closer imaging. If artificial, Loeb hypothesizes it might deploy probes toward Earth between November 21 and December 5, 2025.

Other astronomers, including Jason Wright from Penn State, criticize Loeb’s claims as unsubstantiated, pointing to resolved imaging techniques that confirm cometary features.

Loeb maintains his analysis is a pedagogical exercise and stresses the need for more data, proposing a risk scale from 0 for natural objects to 10 for verified technology. He advocates monitoring for anomalies like non-gravitational acceleration or artificial signals.

NASA confirms 3I/ATLAS poses no threat to Earth and will remain distant during its passage. Ground-based telescopes continue tracking its path as it accelerates outward after perihelion. Further spectroscopic studies aim to identify any volatiles or confirm its composition.

The post Harvard Astrophysicist Fans Alien Speculation After Detecting Odd Energy Signature on Interstellar Object appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Robert Semonsen

Cleaning Up Biden’s Mess: Trump Administration Reviewing 55 Million Visas for Violations

Cleaning Up Biden’s Mess: Trump Administration Reviewing 55 Million Visas for Violations

Cleaning Up Biden’s Mess: Trump Administration Reviewing 55 Million Visas for Violations
August 23, 2025

Deportation flights to remove illegal aliens (DHS Photo by ICE/Released)

 

The Biden administration, in addition to allowing at least 10 million illegal aliens into the country according to CBP data, failed to deport at least 3,095,577 who had already been encountered. More than 617,000 of these had criminal convictions or pending charges, and 1,323,264 with final deportation orders were still allowed to remain in the United States.

Since President Trump’s inauguration, the State Department has revoked more than twice as many visas as during the same period last year, including nearly four times as many student visas. Building on this trend, the administration has launched a sweeping review of more than 55 million valid U.S. visas under a system of “continuous vetting.”

The review is intended to determine whether visas that were legally issued should remain valid or be revoked. According to the State Department, all current visa holders are subject to screening for overstays, criminal activity, security threats, terrorist links, and other disqualifying factors. If such evidence is found, visas will be revoked, and those already in the United States may face deportation.

The government is on track to deport 400,000 people in 2025, according to New York Times estimates. This effort accompanies widespread raids on restaurants, construction sites, and farms, as well as courthouse arrests of individuals attending civil appointments meant to help legalize their status.

In short, while these individuals currently appear to have valid visas, the ongoing review aims to identify those who may have violated the terms or become ineligible since the visas were granted.

The review covers a wide range of visa categories, including student visas (F-1 and J-1), temporary work visas (H-1B, H-2B, and others), B-1/B-2 tourist and business visas, multiple-entry tourist visas, exchange visitor programs, and other temporary visa types. Large populations from countries not in the Visa Waiver Program—such as China, India, Indonesia, Russia, and most African nations—are also included, since their citizens must apply for visas to travel to the United States.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, there were 12.8 million green-card holders and 3.6 million people in the U.S. on temporary visas last year. The total figure of 55 million under review suggests that many of those being screened are currently outside the country but hold multiple-entry tourist visas that allow them to travel back and forth.

The administration has expanded scrutiny of visa applicants for “anti-American” activity, requiring them to unlock their social media accounts and disable privacy settings on cellphones and apps during interviews. USCIS emphasized that visas are a “privilege, not a right,” and that applicants promoting anti-American or antisemitic ideologies will be denied entry.

Since January, Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s office has reported 6,000 student visas revoked. Of these, about 4,000 were tied to criminal offenses such as assault and driving under the influence, while 200 to 300 were linked to terrorism-related concerns, including support for extremist groups. Earlier in the year, student visa processing was briefly suspended, and new vetting procedures for international students were introduced.

Officials say these measures are designed to safeguard national security and prevent individuals who oppose American values from benefiting from U.S. residency, study, or work opportunities.

During Trump’s first dministratin The American Immigration Council’s report (May 2021) examines immigration enforcement under Trump and the early Biden administration. Trump implemented 363 policy changes aimed at subjecting all undocumented immigrants to enforcement, expanding expedited removals, boosting detention, targeting sanctuary jurisdictions, and strengthening ICE cooperation with local law enforcement. Despite aggressive policies, annual removals never exceeded 100,000 due to court backlogs, legal challenges, and resistance from states and cities.

The Biden administration, by contrast, let everyone in and let them stay, regardless of convictions or deportation orders. “We found literally zero visa revocations during the Biden administration,” a senior State Department official said, describing what he called a “blind eye attitude toward law enforcement.” Biden revoked Trump’s enforcement priorities, attempted a 100-day deportation moratorium (blocked in court), limited arrests at courthouses and COVID-19 vaccination sites, and signaled a reduced reliance on detention.

Congressional oversight reports reinforced this picture. A House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement interim staff report, released September 27, 2024, titled New Data Reveal Worsening Magnitude of the Biden Border Crisis and Lack of Interior Immigration Enforcement, drew on both public and nonpublic government data. It found that of nearly six million illegal alien encounters between January 20, 2021, and September 30, 2023, at least 3,095,577 individuals had no confirmed departure from the United States.

The same report revealed that, as of September 2023, more than 617,000 aliens on ICE’s non-detained docket had criminal convictions or pending charges, meaning over half a million criminal aliens were free in U.S. communities. By December 10, 2023, there were also 1,323,264 illegal aliens with final removal orders still living in the country.

The post Cleaning Up Biden’s Mess: Trump Administration Reviewing 55 Million Visas for Violations appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Antonio Graceffo

Publishing Network Booted from MSN After Submitting IJR and The Blaze, Prompting Accusations of Anti-Conservative Bias

Publishing Network Booted from MSN After Submitting IJR and The Blaze, Prompting Accusations of Anti-Conservative Bias
August 23, 2025

Normally, The Western Journal reserves reporting pieces such as this for its loyal members. However, due to the importance of this story, our editors have chosen to release it for free to all our readers.

If you would like to help send The Western Journal’s reporters to investigate important stories like this, please consider becoming a member here.

Michael Chace hadn’t seen it coming.

Before July 16, business was good for his publishing network company, Chace Media. In particular, its partnership with the news syndicator Microsoft Network had grown increasingly successful.

“We were doing over 600 million page views a month on MSN, which is substantial,” Chace told The Western Journal in a phone interview.

Then one day, MSN dropped the hammer, terminating its agreement with Chace Media without a legitimate explanation, Chace said.

The sudden termination ultimately brought him to one conclusion: This was about the conservative news content he had tried submitting.

Chace had worked with Microsoft as a licensor — MSN would license different genres of written content from him and then publish it on its platform.

His strategy was simple. Working as an intermediary, Chace advised media brands on how to adjust their content to fit MSN’s policies. Once adjusted, Chace would submit the brands to MSN, where a team of reviewers either accepted them, rejected them, or returned them for corrections, which were usually minor.

“I don’t care what anyone’s view is, as long as it is brand-safe. It’s not my role to decide left versus right, or dogs versus cats,” Chace told The Western Journal.

It’s a formula that Chace had repeated many times since March 2024, when he started working with MSN.

“Over the last year, my publisher network grew significantly. We had, I think, 54 brands that were approved on MSN through my direct relationship,” Chace says.

During that same period, he said, MSN had also rejected more than 20 brands that Chace had sent over, which was just part of the process.

But everything changed when he submitted content from the Independent Journal Review and The Blaze, two conservative media outlets.

Chace knew something was wrong when he hadn’t received a fast response from MSN, as he usually did.

“There’s no defined timeline, but what they express is that typically it [takes] five business days to get a review. And so there was no feedback,” Chace says.

Eight weeks passed.

Concerned, he emailed his MSN contact on July 15, asking about the status of IJR and The Blaze; he had submitted them in a batch along with five other brands, which weren’t conservative.

The next morning, Microsoft sent him an email saying it was terminating its agreement with Chace Media. Not only that, but it also suspended the 54 brands it had already approved, Chace says.

Left without an explanation, he could only guess what had gone wrong.

“I haven’t been told that it was conservative news that triggered this, but when I look at it, it’s just kind of odd that there had been no change to what we were doing, or how the sites were operating, or who was approved on MSN,” he says.

MSN had rejected IJR and The Blaze once before, in December 2024, Chace said. But in the past, he had resubmitted formerly rejected brands, which MSN later approved. Re-submissions also weren’t prohibited in Microsoft’s publishing guidelines.

On July 16, Chace sent an email to MSN team leader Mark Oda. Eager to fix the situation, Chace even offered to fly out to Japan to meet Oda in person.

But Oda said the termination was final.

“Unfortunately, it has been determined that your brands/content do not fit our current direction and hence the suspension/termination of the account,” Oda wrote in a July 16 email.

The Western Journal reached out by phone and email to MSN about Chace’s allegations.

“We support more than 1,000 news brands that enable MSN to offer a variety of diverse perspectives,” an MSN spokeswoman wrote in an email to The Western Journal.

“In order to provide a trusted and engaging experience to our users, our partners are subject to our core professional publishing standards. When we become aware of instances that violate our policies, we take action to remove them as soon as possible,” the statement reads.

The company added that it doesn’t comment on individual partnerships.

MSN publishes some conservative brands on its platform, including The Western Journal and The Daily Caller.

The National Review and cable giant Fox News also have a presence on the website.

But besides IJR and The Blaze, other popular conservative sites are noticeably missing, such as Breitbart and The Daily Wire. The Western Journal reached out to both outlets regarding their relationship with MSN.

Meanwhile, left-leaning outlets are ubiquitous on the platform: The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Guardian, The Washington Post, The Nation, The Daily Beast, The Hill, CNN, MSNBC, and others.

As for Chace, he’s moving on without MSN.

“I feel that a better content ecosystem has all voices on it, and not just whatever the objective might be of a much larger company,” he told The Western Journal.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Publishing Network Booted from MSN After Submitting IJR and The Blaze, Prompting Accusations of Anti-Conservative Bias appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Ole Braatelien, The Western Journal

Rose Unplugged with Co-Author of Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology and Reality John Leake (AUDIO)

Rose Unplugged with Co-Author of Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology and Reality John Leake (AUDIO)

Rose Unplugged with Co-Author of Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology and Reality John Leake (AUDIO)
August 23, 2025

Co-author of Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality, John Leake joined Rose Unplugged to explore the surprising origins, contested history, and complex legacy of vaccines—from Edward Jenner’s cowpox experiment to today’s public health debates.

This podcast dives into the science, myths, and ideologies surrounding one of the most influential medical technologies ever developed. While acknowledging the role vaccines have played in reducing disease, this episode questions the dominant narratives, examining the roles of propaganda, profit motives, and scientific uncertainty.

It’s a call for honest, evidence-based discussion that doesn’t shy away from the failures, risks, and ethical questions often left out of the mainstream conversation.

The two also discuss childhood vaccines and the urgency to find out what has injured children in the past.

AUDIO:

Please follow Rose Unplugged on Rumble here.

The post Rose Unplugged with Co-Author of Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology and Reality John Leake (AUDIO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cristina Laila

Flashback: Democrats Strip Texas AG of Election Fraud Authority but GOP Is Fighting Back

Flashback: Democrats Strip Texas AG of Election Fraud Authority but GOP Is Fighting Back

Flashback: Democrats Strip Texas AG of Election Fraud Authority but GOP Is Fighting Back
August 23, 2025

President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump visit the areas impacted by recent deadly flooding, Friday, July 11, 2025, in Kerrville, Texas. (Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks)

 

In 2021, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals stunned voters by stripping the state’s Attorney General Ken Paxton of a power his office had exercised for more than 70 years: the ability to independently prosecute election fraud. 

For Attorney General Ken Paxton, one of the nation’s strongest voices for election integrity, the ruling is a calculated gift to Democrats who depend on weak enforcement to protect their ballot-harvesting machines.

Now, Republicans are fighting back. Recently, Rep. Matt Shaheen of Plano filed House Joint Resolution 1 and House Bill 11, legislation that would restore the Attorney General’s independent authority to prosecute voter fraud. 

 

 

In the Senate, a near-identical measure, Senate Bill 11, already cleared a preliminary vote. Both measures are barreling through the legislature, with support from Gov. Greg Abbott, who has made election integrity one of his top priorities for the special session ending August 19.

The timing couldn’t be more urgent. Under current law, Paxton’s office can only step in if a local district attorney invites him. That safeguard has proven toothless. In case after case, Democrat-aligned prosecutors have shrugged off evidence of fraud. 

Paxton highlighted the problem himself earlier this year, warning that “rogue district and county attorneys” are deliberately declining to prosecute cases that threaten their own political machines. 

Without state-level authority, voter fraud is left to local discretion—an open invitation to abuse.

The 2021 case that neutered the AG’s office stemmed from Paxton’s prosecution of a southeast Texas sheriff for alleged ballot fraud after the 2016 election. The local DA refused to act, and when Paxton’s team moved forward anyway, the sheriff challenged their authority. 

WATCH: Texas GOP candidate Jay Furman EXPOSES the CORRUPT tactics used by DEMOCRATS.

The Court sided with the sheriff, effectively rewriting seven decades of precedent. The ruling meant the state’s top law enforcement officer was now powerless to pursue election fraud without permission from local prosecutors—many of whom owe their positions to the same crooked systems in need of oversight.

Republicans aren’t waiting around for another court to tie their hands. They’re advancing legislation that will slam the door shut on Democrats’ ability to shield corruption. 

Just this year, Texas passed House Bill 5115, which takes effect September 1. That law upgrades penalties for voter fraud from a slap-on-the-wrist misdemeanor to a felony carrying up to 20 years in prison. 

Lying on a voter application, altering ballots, or forging signatures will now carry the same weight as other serious felonies. For comparison, voter fraud in most states still results in fines or probation. 

Texas Republicans are raising the stakes—sending a national message that playing games with the ballot box won’t be tolerated.

Democrats and their media allies argue that voter fraud is “rare.” The numbers tell a different story. Since 2005, there have been more than 1,400 proven cases of election fraud nationwide, according to the Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database. 

In Texas alone, Paxton’s office has prosecuted nearly 100 cases since 2005, even with limited authority. And those are just the cases caught—how many slip through when prosecutors refuse to act?

The effort to restore Paxton’s authority is more than a Texas fight. It’s part of a broader national battle to ensure Democrats can’t hide behind prosecutors who look the other way. 

In Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin—states critical in the 2024 election—local officials have already shown they’re willing to let irregularities slide. Giving state attorneys general the teeth to act independently is the only way to enforce accountability across partisan lines.

President Trump has consistently championed election integrity as the cornerstone of fair democracy. 

Democrats want weak laws, weak prosecutors, and weak enforcement. Republicans want the opposite—because the integrity of American elections demands it.

The post Flashback: Democrats Strip Texas AG of Election Fraud Authority but GOP Is Fighting Back appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Gregory Lyakhov