Minneapolis Fire Department Report Reveals New Details About the ICE-Involved Fatal Shooting of Renee Good

Minneapolis Fire Department Report Reveals New Details About the ICE-Involved Fatal Shooting of Renee Good

Minneapolis Fire Department Report Reveals New Details About the ICE-Involved Fatal Shooting of Renee Good
January 16, 2026

Person in a vehicle wearing a beanie and gray jacket, engaged in conversation while driving, with a visible steering wheel and outdoor background.

A Minneapolis Fire Department report reveals new details about the fatal ICE-involved shooting of Renee Good.

Renee Good, 37, was fatally shot after she used her vehicle as a weapon as ICE agents descended on a neighborhood in Minneapolis last week.

Initial reports claimed Good was shot three times, however, the fire incident report reveals she was shot four times.

Renee Good suffered two gun shot wounds to the chest, one to her forearm and another to the left side of her head.

Fox News reported:

Renee Nicole Good, the woman fatally shot by a U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer last week, was found with four gunshot wounds, the Minnesota Star Tribune reported, citing a fire department incident report.

Good, 37, suffered two gunshot wounds to the right side of her chest, one to her left forearm and one “with protruding tissue on the left side of the patient’s head,” according to the report by the Minneapolis Fire Department. Blood was also flowing from her left ear, the report said.

Initial reports indicated Good had been shot three times during the Jan. 7 incident.

Paramedics found Good unresponsive inside her car at 9:42 a.m., with blood on her face and torso, according to the report. She was not breathing, and her pulse was described as “inconsistent” and “irregular.”

Emergency responders moved Good from her vehicle to a snowbank and then onto a sidewalk to create “separation from an escalating scene involving law enforcement and bystanders,” according to the report.

At that point, Good was “still not breathing and pulseless,” the report said.

POV cellphone footage from the ICE agent involved in the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good was released last Friday.

The POV footage shows Good’s romantic partner talking trash to the ICE agent as he approached her wife’s SUV.

“You wanna come at us?” Good’s partner said taunting the ICE agent. “I say go get yourself some lunch big boy.”

“Get out of the f*cking car!” an ICE agent said as he tried to open Good’s door.

Good accelerates her vehicle as her partner shouted, “Drive, baby! Drive!”

The ICE agent shouted, “Whoa!” as he fatally shot Good.

The ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good as she tried to run him over during a lawful immigration operation in Minneapolis last week suffered internal bleeding to his torso.

The post Minneapolis Fire Department Report Reveals New Details About the ICE-Involved Fatal Shooting of Renee Good appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cristina Laila

DID WE LEARN NOTHING? NIH Funds Wuhan-Style Bat Lab at Colorado State University

DID WE LEARN NOTHING? NIH Funds Wuhan-Style Bat Lab at Colorado State University

DID WE LEARN NOTHING? NIH Funds Wuhan-Style Bat Lab at Colorado State University
January 16, 2026

It has been four years since the world was brought to its knees by a virus that many evidence-based reports now indicate leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. You would think the federal government and the “experts” in the public health establishment would have learned their lesson.

You would be wrong.

Colorado State University (CSU) is moving full steam ahead with a massive, taxpayer-funded “Bat Resource Center.”

This new facility, which is bankrolled by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the very same agency that funded dangerous research in Wuhan, will import and breed exotic bats to experiment on them with deadly pathogens.

The facility is being touted by the university as a “critical resource” to study how bats carry viruses like Ebola, Nipah, and SARS-CoV-2 without getting sick.

According to documents uncovered by the watchdog group White Coat Waste Project, this isn’t just a simple animal shelter. It is a vivarium designed to house huge colonies of bats, the very same animals identified as the reservoir for the COVID-19 virus.

White Coat Project wrote on its website:

We’ve now revealed that the NIH is still eager to move forward with the project minus EHA; and gave CSU an additional $2.3 million to do so just two months ago.

Funding details for the establishment of a bat resource for infectious disease research at Colorado State University, including budget amounts and project dates.

Through a Colorado Open Records Act (CORA) request to CSU, WCobtained photos, videos, and other documents that provide new insight into the virus-hunting and bat experiments CSU has been conducting.

Bats being examined in a laboratory setting, showcasing their distinctive features and surrounding medical tools.
Photos of CSU’s taxpayer-funded bat experiments and virus-hunting obtained by White Coat Waste via state and federal open records investigations.

Working with deadly and highly contagious pathogens such as Zika, rabies, Nipah, and various coronavirus strains, CSU white coats have been infecting bats, watching them suffer through the painful infection, and killing any bats that survive the experiments.

Similar to white coats in Wuhan, they have genetically modified the coronavirus; creating three new strains of the virus and infecting 162 bats with the novel pathogen.

Documents obtained via CORA detail starvation protocols; where bats are forced into “nutritional stress” so that white coats can observe if malnourishment damages their immune system (as it does in humans and other species).

Local residents should be terrified. CSU has a history of negligence in its labs.

One of the most alarming incidents occurred when a researcher was transferring a bat from its cage to a biosafety cabinet. Despite double gloves and a leather glove, the bat reportedly caught the glove with its mouth, leaving a visible red spot on the researcher’s finger consistent with a bite.

The bat involved had reportedly been vaccinated against MERS-CoV and later challenged with a human isolate of the virus, according to the incident report.

Another report describes a researcher performing a tail vein injection on a mouse infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (HN878 strain). The animal moved, the vein was missed, pressure built up in the syringe, and the contents sprayed out of the biosafety cabinet and onto the researcher’s face.

Additional incidents include:

  • A mouse infected with Mycobacterium abscessus biting a researcher’s finger during oral dosing.
  • A researcher accidentally puncturing their own thumb with a lancet while collecting blood from a mouse infected with genetically modified Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
  • Reports of researchers handling mice without required PPE, despite signage clearly listing safety requirements.

Image depicting a laboratory incident report detailing safety protocols involving a researcher handling a bat and a mouse infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium abscessus.

The project was greenlit by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). For years, NIAID has funneled American tax dollars into risky animal experiments, and now they are setting up shop in the Rocky Mountains.

Even more disturbing is CSU’s track record. According to The White Coast, the university has previously partnered with the EcoHealth Alliance, the disgraced group led by Peter Daszak that was at the center of the Wuhan gain-of-function controversy.

The proposal requested approximately $13 million. While CSU claims they have “suspended” their subcontract with EcoHealth, the connections remain a massive red flag.

Republican lawmakers have had enough. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) and Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) have both blasted the NIH for continuing to bankroll what they call dangerous, wasteful, and unnecessary research.

In letters to NIH leadership, they’ve demanded an immediate halt to funding and called for greater accountability for the agency’s decisions.

Watch the interview below with Justin Goodman, Senior Vice President of Advocacy and Public Policy at the White Coat Waste Project (WCW):

The post DID WE LEARN NOTHING? NIH Funds Wuhan-Style Bat Lab at Colorado State University appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Jim Hᴏft

Buying Greenland Could Cost the US $700 billion

Buying Greenland Could Cost the US $700 billion
January 16, 2026

Trump usually gets what he wants.

From ‘Trump will never be able to buy Greenland’, to ‘it’s going to be very expensive’.

When US President Donald J. Trump first floated the idea of buying Greenland, he was equally ridiculed by European political leaders and the MSM.

But now, after a full year of pressure, negotiations, and threats, no one is smiling anymore – and they’ve already started calculating the price!

Buying Greenland, a report suggests, could cost as much as $700 billion, officials are estimating.

The Telegraph reported:

“Denmark and Greenland insist the semi-autonomous Danish territory is not for sale, but the US president has insisted he will take it “one way or the other” for national security reasons.

[…] Academics and former US officials were asked to estimate costs as part of planning for a takeover of the island, which has sought-after rare-earth minerals and is strategically positioned in the far north.

The sum of $700bn is equivalent to more than half the US defense department’s annual budget.”

NBC News reported:

“The estimate was generated by scholars and former U.S. officials as part of planning around Trump’s aspiration to acquire the 800,000-square-mile island as a strategic buffer in the Arctic against America’s top adversaries, these people said. It attaches a price tag of more than half the Defense Department’s annual budget to Trump’s national security priority, which has stoked anxiety across Europe and on Capitol Hill amid his rhetoric about seizing Greenland since he ordered a U.S. military raid to capture Venezuela’s president and his wife.

Greenland, the autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, is not for sale. Officials from Denmark and Greenland have rejected Trump’s claims that the U.S. will acquire Greenland ‘one way or the other’. A senior White House official, however, said Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been directed to come up with a proposal in the coming weeks to purchase Greenland, describing such a plan as a ‘high priority’ for Trump.”

Christine Zenino from Chicago, US/Wikimedia Commons

“’I’d love to make a deal with them’, Trump told reporters Sunday when he was asked whether there is a deal Greenland could offer. ‘It’s easier. But one way or the other, we’re going to have Greenland’.”

Read more:

Trump Administration Considering Paying Thousands to Greenlanders To Get Them To Support Joining the United States: REPORT

The post Buying Greenland Could Cost the US $700 billion appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Paul Serran

Sanctity of Life Sunday, Christian Unity, and Marches

Sanctity of Life Sunday, Christian Unity, and Marches

Sanctity of Life Sunday, Christian Unity, and Marches
January 16, 2026

Guest Post by Pro-life Leader Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life

The “Super Bowl” of the pro-life movement is here, and the days in which Churches, media and government all pay a little more attention than usual to the most foundational moral issue of the day, abortion.

I say “foundational,” because it’s not necessarily the issue that is top of mind for most people, but it is the one on which every other issue depends, because the right to life itself is the foundation of all our other rights.

These are the days, then, when the two largest annual events in the pro-life movement occur – the March for Life in Washington (January 23) and the Walk for Life West Coast (January 24 in San Francisco).

Yet it is not simply about those two events. In fact a whole kaleidoscope of pro-life events take place this week, spearheaded by groups large and small. So numerous are the activities that even we who lead this movement fulltime can’t keep track of them all.

My team and I are leading six national events, the details of which you can see at ProLifeMarch.org.

The premiere event is the National Prayer Service on Friday morning January 23rd at Constitution Hall. We’ll be honoring Charlie Kirk, celebrating the 250th Birthday of America (a year-long 2026 celebration), and welcoming Liche Ariza, an actor in the popular series The Chosen. Please join us!

To kick off this week, this Sunday is Sanctity of Life Sunday as well as the start of the annual Week of Prayer for Christian Unity. What a marvelous opportunity for Churches to reflect on the connections between the mission of the Church and the mission of the pro-life movement.

They intersect perfectly, of course. The Christian Gospel is all about God taking human life to his throne. He becomes one of us, he saves us, he conquers death, he promises that where he is, we also will be.

Is it possible, or even conceivable, that the Church can credibly proclaim that God wants human lives with him on his throne, and at the same time turn the other way when those same human lives are being thrown in the garbage by abortion?

No, it’s not possible, logical, or conceivable.

The very truths, in fact, that unite all Christians are the very truths that reject all abortions. God himself became human. He was an embryo, a fetus. He showed his love for human life by dying and rising for us, and making his dwelling among us and within us.

Moreover, Christ came to reconcile sinners with the Father. That’s why, on both coasts next weekend, I will lead gatherings in which those who have had abortions will share their stories about the despair and pain of abortion, and the hope and healing of Jesus Christ. This is the Silent No More Awareness Campaign. When the DC march reaches the Supreme Court, and when the West Coast march first gathers for its rally, these gatherings will occur and the Gospel of mercy and hope will be proclaimed!

So this weekend, let the voice of the Church sound forth for the sanctity of life!

Let the pastors of all denominations proclaim that nobody can be a Christian and “prochoice” at the same time. Let the leaders in the Body of Christ call forth the people to join in the numerous events taking place this coming week across the nation to give voice to the unborn – events filled with prayer, with compassion for those tempted to have abortions, with mercy and welcome for those who have repented of the sin of abortion, and with protest against the ongoing evil of child-killing.

This week, may Christians unite in the clear and practical proclamation of the Gospel of Life!


Prolife Leader Frank Pavone is the National Director of Priests for Life and President of Prolife Vote.

For more information on the political work of Priests for Life, see our c-4, ProLife Vote.

The post Sanctity of Life Sunday, Christian Unity, and Marches appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Guest Contributor

Canada’s Globalist PM Carney Bows to Beijing, Praises Xi, and Hails a “New World Order” While Pushing Away America

Canada’s Globalist PM Carney Bows to Beijing, Praises Xi, and Hails a “New World Order” While Pushing Away America

Canada’s Globalist PM Carney Bows to Beijing, Praises Xi, and Hails a “New World Order” While Pushing Away America
January 16, 2026

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Chinese Communist Party Leader Xi via Carney’s Facebook

Canada’s globalist Prime Minister Mark Carney’s long-anticipated trip to Beijing appears to be marked by a striking pivot away from Canada’s traditional alliances and toward deeper engagement with Communist China.

Claimed by Carney as a necessary adjustment to a “new world order,” the visit instead underscored Ottawa’s growing willingness to accommodate Beijing—and push away the United States—at a moment of geopolitical upheaval.

The prime minister of America’s neighbor to the north gushed over Chinese President Xi Jinping, praising his “leadership” during public remarks—language that raised eyebrows both at home and abroad.

For a North American leader—and the head of state of a 5 eyes country—to laud the head of a one-party authoritarian state was seen as slightly more than mere diplomatic courtesy. It looked like deference.

The visit was the first by a Canadian prime minister to China in eight years and comes amid deeply strained relations with America.

Rather than attempting to mend ties with Canada’s closest ally and largest trading partner, Carney seemed eager to showcase Beijing as a strategic alternative—a move that looks like the application of globalist pressure on the Trump administration.

Speaking alongside Chinese officials in a press conference, Carney celebrated what he called “rapid progress” in Canada-China relations. He pointed to cooperation across energy, agriculture, finance, and so-called people-to-people exchanges, hinting at a broad re-alignment of Canadian economic priorities.

Carney’s invocation of a “new world order” was especially controversial. While offered a neutral language of global transition, critics noted that it echoed Beijing’s preferred framing of a world less anchored in Western norms and democratic accountability.

Make no mistake, the timing of the trip was no accident. Carney has repeatedly described Canada’s relationship with the United States as having suffered a historic rupture, particularly after trade disputes and President Trump’s rhetoric toward Ottawa.

Rather than negotiate from strength, however, Carney arrived in Beijing signaling accommodation. He cast China as a stable, predictable partner—an assertion that holds little—if any—meaning given Beijing’s history of coercive trade practices and political retaliation.

Chinese state media, viewing the meeting as a massive foreign policy win, of course wasted no time exploiting the optics. Commentaries openly portrayed Canada as a country seeking “strategic autonomy” by loosening its alignment with the United States and embracing Chinese markets instead.

Behind the scenes, Carney, a globalist whose private career in finance was marked by extensive dealings with China, met with executives from major Chinese state-linked firms, including energy giants and battery manufacturers. These meetings reinforced perceptions that economic expediency was taking precedence over national security concerns.

Those concerns are not theoretical. Canada’s relationship with China deteriorated sharply after the 2018 arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, followed by Beijing’s detention of Canadian citizens on dubious espionage charges—a stark reminder of how Beijing weaponizes access and leverage.

Carney, however, seems eager to put that history behind him. His government has expressed hope of easing Chinese tariffs on Canadian agricultural exports while reconsidering its own tariffs on Chinese EVs.

What made the visit particularly controversial were renewed questions about Carney’s past business dealings in China. During his private-sector career, Carney cultivated extensive ties to Chinese financial and corporate interests, relationships that critics argue now cast a long shadow over his policy choices.

Throughout his political rise, Carney has of course insisted those ties pose no conflict of interest. Still, his conspicuous warmth toward Beijing has fueled skepticism that Canada’s national interests are being subordinated to globalist economic instincts.

Even members of Carney’s own delegation appeared uneasy. Observers noted visible surprise when the prime minister spoke glowingly of Xi’s leadership, while journalists accompanying the trip were reportedly advised to carry burner phones due to surveillance concerns.

Canada’s industry minister, for his part, attempted to reassure reporters that Ottawa is approaching China with “eyes wide open.” The contrast, however, between those assurances and the tone of Carney’s remarks was difficult to miss.

Meanwhile, Chinese officials remarked that the visit was undeniable proof that Western resistance to Beijing’s influence is eroding. Its state-run media outlets openly warned Canada not to return to a China policy shaped by America’s priorities.

The episode appears to highlight a deeper problem. In the face of pressure from the United States, Canada’s leadership chose not to defend sovereignty or democratic alignment, but to shop for alternatives among authoritarian powers.

The post Canada’s Globalist PM Carney Bows to Beijing, Praises Xi, and Hails a “New World Order” While Pushing Away America appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Robert Semonsen