Social Media Users LIGHT UP James Talarico After Hearing the Woke Four-Word Term He Uses to Describe Women (VIDEO)

Social Media Users LIGHT UP James Talarico After Hearing the Woke Four-Word Term He Uses to Describe Women (VIDEO)

by | May 30, 2026 | Aggregate

Social Media Users LIGHT UP James Talarico After Hearing the Woke Four-Word Term He Uses to Describe Women (VIDEO)
May 30, 2026

Texas Democrat Senate candidate James Talarico. Credit: PowerfulJRE YouTube screenshot

Texas Democrat U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico managed to go viral for all the wrong reasons on Friday after a SuperPAC uncovered some old clips of him using a weird term to describe women.

Any normal person knows that there are two sexes: male and female. In addition, the terms men and women are used to describe those with male and female body parts.

Talarico, though, is anything but normal. It turns out he has a bizarre four-word term to describe the female race: neighbors with a uterus.

The Lone Star Liberty PAC, which supports Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, released two clips of Talarico saying exactly this.

“Every one of our neighbors with a uterus became the property of the state,” Talarico says to a church audience in the first clip.

“Our neighbors with a uterus need to be able to control their own bodies,” he says in the second clip.

WATCH:

X users quickly lit up Talarico for not being able to use the term woman to describe the female

Just when one thinks Talarico can’t get any woker, he manages to surpass these expectations with flying colors.

The post Social Media Users LIGHT UP James Talarico After Hearing the Woke Four-Word Term He Uses to Describe Women (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cullen Linebarger

Gavin Newsom Plans To Sabotage California Recipients of Trump’s Anti-Gov Weaponization Fund? | Drew Hernandez

Gavin Newsom Plans To Sabotage California Recipients of Trump’s Anti-Gov Weaponization Fund? | Drew Hernandez

by | May 30, 2026 | Aggregate

Gavin Newsom Plans To Sabotage California Recipients of Trump’s Anti-Gov Weaponization Fund? | Drew Hernandez
May 30, 2026

Political tension is depicted with a shouting politician on one side and a group of supporters in MAGA hats pointing in unison on the other side.

Woke California Gov. Gavin Newsom vowed this week to impose a 100% state tax on any California resident who receives money from President Donald Trump’s new “Anti‑Weaponization Fund.” Speaking at a news conference in Sacramento, Newsom said, “Anyone from California that receives any of those funds, we want to tax 100% of those proceeds,” calling it “an action the state of California can take” and one his administration “looks forward to taking.”

Newsom and other critics have branded the program a political “slush fund,” claiming that Trump is creating a taxpayer‑financed pool of money that could reward his allies, including some involved in the events of January 6th. The Anti‑Weaponization Fund, totaling about $1.776 billion, was announced by the Justice Department as part of a settlement of Trump’s multibillion‑dollar lawsuit over the leak of his tax returns from the Internal Revenue Service.

According to DOJ statements, the money—drawn from the federal Judgment Fund—would be used to compensate people who claim they were victims of “lawfare” or a “weaponized” federal government, offering monetary awards or formal apologies instead of paying Trump directly. A five‑member commission appointed by the attorney general is supposed to decide which claims are valid and how much to pay.

Legal challenges have already slowed the rollout: a federal judge in Virginia has temporarily blocked the administration from transferring money into the fund or paying any claims while lawsuits contesting its legality move forward. Newsom has acknowledged that imposing a 100% tax on payouts would require action by California’s Democrat‑controlled Legislature, and observers note that any such measure would likely face court challenges.

Defending his plan, Newsom has added his spin by claiming that “individuals who attack law enforcement and undermine democracy do not merit a taxpayer‑funded windfall,” warning that the fund could send money to people he says helped erode democracy. Supporters of the Anti‑Weaponization Fund contend it offers a lawful process for Americans who believe they were unfairly targeted by federal agencies to seek redress.

Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!

Follow Drew on X: https://x.com/DrewHLive
Follow Drew on Rumble: https://rumble.com/DrewHernandez

The post Gavin Newsom Plans To Sabotage California Recipients of Trump’s Anti-Gov Weaponization Fund? | Drew Hernandez appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Drew Hernandez

John Cornyn Sends Internet into a Frenzy with This Cryptic Tweet Following Landslide Loss to Ken Paxton

John Cornyn Sends Internet into a Frenzy with This Cryptic Tweet Following Landslide Loss to Ken Paxton

by | May 30, 2026 | Aggregate

John Cornyn Sends Internet into a Frenzy with This Cryptic Tweet Following Landslide Loss to Ken Paxton
May 30, 2026

John Cornyn concedes Texas Senate race – May 26, 2026

Senator John Cornyn (RINO-TX) drove the internet crazy on Friday after posting a very cryptic tweet a few days following his massive loss to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the Texas GOP Senate runoff election.

As The Gateway Pundit’s Jordan Conradson reported, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton smoked Cornyn in a landslide victory on Tuesday. The race was called within one hour of the polls closing.

Out of nowhere, Cornyn decided to tweet the famous fable of the scorpion and the frog. As TGP readers know, the frog decides to carry the scorpion across the river after the eight-legged arthropod promises not to sting it.

But the scorpion suddenly betrays the frog, stinging it in the middle of the river, and both die. When the dying frog asked the scorpion why it stung, the arthropod replied: “I couldn’t help myself. It’s my character.”

“An old, but apt fable,” Cornyn began in his tweet. “A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across.”

“The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion promises not to, pointing out that it would drown if it killed the frog in the middle of the river,” he continued. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion.”

“Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: ‘I am sorry, but I couldn’t help myself. It’s my character.’ ”

Social media users immediately began speculating about what Cornyn could have meant by this fable. Many thought he was calling Trump the scorpion and himself the frog.

Others theorized that Cornyn was calling himself the scorpion.

The post John Cornyn Sends Internet into a Frenzy with This Cryptic Tweet Following Landslide Loss to Ken Paxton appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cullen Linebarger

Mexican Chamber of Deputies Passes Reform Allowing Election Annulment for Foreign Interference, Raising Serious Concerns About Morena’s Intentions

Mexican Chamber of Deputies Passes Reform Allowing Election Annulment for Foreign Interference, Raising Serious Concerns About Morena’s Intentions

by | May 30, 2026 | Aggregate

Mexican Chamber of Deputies Passes Reform Allowing Election Annulment for Foreign Interference, Raising Serious Concerns About Morena’s Intentions
May 30, 2026

This Thursday, after a marathon overnight session, Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies—dominated by the ruling Morena party and its allies—approved q constitutional reform that adds “foreign intervention” as a new ground for annulling elections.

The measure passed with 307 votes in favor, 128 against, and one abstention. The Senate has already approved the constitutional amendment but this reforms still requires ratification by a majority of Mexico’s state legislatures before becoming part of the Constitution

Constitutional Changes

The change modifies Article 41, Section VI of the Constitution, enabling the Electoral Tribunal to nullify elections when acts of foreign interference — by governments, organizations, or even individuals — are deemed to have seriously influenced voter preferences or results.

Ricardo Monreal, Morena’s coordinator in the Chamber, introduced last-minute adjustments to the wording amid criticism, but the core mechanism remains broad. Secondary legal reforms were partially deferred.

Why was this change approved now

Morena and President Claudia Sheinbaum defended the reform as a necessary safeguard for national sovereignty against external threats, citing disinformation, media pressure, and diplomatic statements — often pointing implicitly or explicitly toward the United States and international critics. Monreal argued it closes a legal gap and protects the popular will.

However, the rushed process — pushed through an extraordinary session with limited debate and after other controversial reforms — has fueled deep skepticism.

Morena’s supermajority enabled swift passage through party discipline, despite opposition warnings. Critics argue the timing is suspiciously convenient: introduced amid tensions with the U.S., opposition gains in some areas, and broader institutional changes that strengthen Morena’s control.

Morena’s True Intentions

While protecting elections from genuine foreign meddling sounds reasonable, many analysts and opposition figures view this reform as a thinly veiled tool for power consolidation rather than a good-faith defense of democracy. The vaguely worded criteria for what constitutes “decisive influence” — potentially including foreign media coverage, social media activity, NGO reports, or diplomatic criticism — grant significant discretion to institutions perceived as aligned with Morena.

Opposition leaders, including from PAN, PRI, and MC, have denounced it as a mechanism to “annul elections a la carte” if results do not favor the ruling party. Ricardo Anaya and others warned that it opens the door for selective application, allowing Morena to challenge unfavorable outcomes under the guise of sovereignty. The reform’s broad scope could chill free speech, international scrutiny, and legitimate journalism — all while Morena has shown less concern for domestic issues like organized crime influence in elections.

This move fits a larger pattern under Morena: judicial reforms, changes to electoral oversight, and institutional tweaks that critics say tilt the playing field in their favor. Rather than strengthening democracy, it risks undermining electoral certainty and public trust, especially with the Electoral Tribunal seen as sympathetic to the ruling coalition.

The haste and lack of broad consensus suggest the primary goal may be insulating Morena from future political losses rather than addressing proven, widespread foreign threats. L

Comparison with the United States

In the U.S., foreign election interference is addressed through prevention, investigation, and sanctions — not post-hoc annulment of results. Laws ban foreign contributions, with enforcement via the DOJ, FEC, and intelligence agencies. High-profile cases (e.g., 2016 Russian activities) led to probes, indictments, and reforms, but completed elections are not overturned on broad interference claims due to decentralized state administration and high legal thresholds. Mexico’s approach creates a more direct — and potentially more subjective — judicial override, which opponents fear could be abused.

What is next for Mexico

The Senate is expected to take up the measure soon. If approved, the reform could apply to future elections, though secondary details were delayed. Its real danger lies in implementation: an ambiguous tool in the hands of a dominant political force inevitably invites accusations of authoritarian overreach.

This reform shows Morena’s willingness to bend institutional rules to its advantage under the banner of patriotism. While cloaked in sovereignty rhetoric, the reform casts doubt on the party’s commitment to fair, transparent democracy — prioritizing control over genuine electoral integrity.

The post Mexican Chamber of Deputies Passes Reform Allowing Election Annulment for Foreign Interference, Raising Serious Concerns About Morena’s Intentions appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Gateway Hispanic

Watch How a Hijab-Wearing AOC Is Treated by a Muslim Male Audience as She Tries Pandering to Them During Eid Celebration in New York City

Watch How a Hijab-Wearing AOC Is Treated by a Muslim Male Audience as She Tries Pandering to Them During Eid Celebration in New York City

by | May 30, 2026 | Aggregate

Watch How a Hijab-Wearing AOC Is Treated by a Muslim Male Audience as She Tries Pandering to Them During Eid Celebration in New York City
May 30, 2026

AOC wearing a hijab while addressing an audience during Eid celebrations in New York City.

A Muslim male crowd gave AOC a rude welcome as she attempted to pander to them at a prominent Muslim holiday celebration in New York City.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, AOC was seen wearing a hijab at an Eid Celebration in New York City, which was attended by Muslim men.

Addressing a crowd on Wednesday, AOC called on people to “renew our commitments to one another” so together they “can bring light into the darkness.”

Despite claiming to be a feminist who wants to dismantle the patriarchy, the hijab is widely seen as a symbol of female repression intended to prevent Islamic women from attracting the attention of men.

Despite AOC’s pandering, the Muslim audience was unmoved.

Instead of listening, the attendees ignored what she was saying and started speaking among themselves.

In addition, the background noise completely muffled her speech.

So much disrespect for AOC.

WATCH:

In contrast, look at how the audience received Mamdani:

Islamists are more than happy to vote for leftist politicians like AOC because she will help usher in demographic changes favorable to them and appeal to their anti-Semitic beliefs.

But make no mistake: they respect women like AOC as much as dirt.

What happened on Wednesday was no accident.

The post Watch How a Hijab-Wearing AOC Is Treated by a Muslim Male Audience as She Tries Pandering to Them During Eid Celebration in New York City appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Go to Source
Author: Cullen Linebarger